- freely available
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14(3), 5545-5559; doi:10.3390/ijms14035545
Abstract: The Mustang, Musculoskeletal Temporally Activated Novel-1 Gene (MUSTN1) plays an important role in regulating musculoskeletal development in mammals. We evaluated the developmental and tissue-specific regulation of MUSTN1 mRNA and protein abundance in Erlang Mountainous (EM) chickens. Results indicated that MUSTN1 mRNA/protein was expressed in most tissues with especially high expression in heart and skeletal muscle. The MUSTN1 protein localized to the nucleus in myocardium and skeletal muscle fibers. There were significant differences in mRNA and protein abundance among tissues, ages and between males and females. In conclusion, MUSTN1 was expressed the greatest in skeletal muscle where it localized to the nucleus. Thus, in chickens MUSTN1 may play a vital role in muscle development.
Muscle hypertrophy is preceded by satellite cell activation and differentiation of myoblasts into myotubes, these processes involving a complex interplay between various transcription factors. We recently identified MUSTN1 as a candidate gene for quantitative trait loci affecting muscle growth in Chinese quality chickens .
In mammals, MUSTN1 encodes a small (9.6 kDa) nuclear protein that is predominantly expressed in the musculoskeletal system . Results from numerous studies demonstrated that MUSTN1 can affect musculoskeletal system development [3,4] and muscle hypertrophy in different species [5–7]. Many experiments have focused on MRF gene family members (MyoD, myogenin, myf-5, and MRF4) as regulators of satellite cell activation, maturation, and differentiation [8–13]. Silencing MUSTN1 lead to reduced expression of some of the MRF family myogenic markers [7,14]. Thus, it is tempting to speculate that MUSTN1 function may be linked to the process of myogenesis. Through transcriptional profiling experiments, MUSTN1 was identified as a gene for which expression changes during bone regeneration , and has a probable function in cell differentiation . MUSTN1 was ubiquitously distributed in embryos, but was restricted to skeletal muscle and tendon tissue of adults , with increased expression from embryogenesis that peaks during the third month of life in mice . Kostek et al. found that there were changes at both 6 and 24 h post exercise in MUSTN1 abundance in human skeletal muscle. The function of MUSTN1 in avian species is unclear and because we identified it as a candidate gene affecting muscle growth in Chinese chickens, studies on regulation of its expression may elucidate mechanisms regulating muscle growth in chickens. The objective of this study was to evaluate the developmental, tissue- and sex-specific regulation of MUSTN1 mRNA and protein abundance expression in chickens.
2.1. The Meat Weight Traits of Male and Female Chickens at Different Ages
Results for meat traits in males and females on day 1, 28, 49 and 70 (Table 1) indicated that there were some significant differences at different ages in LW, BMW, LMW, HW, BFDM, BFD, LFDM and LFD. Male chickens had greater LW, BMW, LMW, HW and BFD than female chickens (p < 0.01). LW, BMW, LMW, HW BFDM, and LFDM increased with age (p < 0.01). Interaction of age × sex was significant for LW, LMW, HW (p < 0.01) and BMW (p < 0.05) (Table 2). LW, BMW, LMW and HW of male and female chickens increased with age (p < 0.01). Male chickens had higher LW, LMW (p < 0.01), and BMW (p < 0.05) than female chickens at day 49. Male chickens also had higher LW, LMW, HW (p < 0.01), and BMW (p < 0.05) than female chickens at day 70.
2.2. The mRNA Abundance of Chicken MUSTN1 in Different Tissues
We evaluated the expression pattern of MUSTN1 in different chicken tissues between day 1 and 70 post-hatch. Figure 1 illustrates mRNA abundance at day 1 (top panel) and day 70 (bottom panel) post-hatch in all tissues of males and females. At both ages, MUSTN1 mRNA is predominantly expressed in heart and skeletal muscle, with negligible expression in other tissues (liver, spleen, kidney, brain, jejunum, gonad, bursa of fabricius, proventriculus, gizzard, lungs, subcutaneous fat and abdominal fat). To illustrate the differences between non-muscle tissues that are not apparent when shown in comparison to muscle, non-muscle tissue data are shown separately for day 1 (Figure 1A1) and day 70 (Figure 1A2), in addition to being shown in comparison to muscle tissue at both ages (Figure 1B1,1B2, respectively). At day 1, the average relative abundance of MUSTN1 mRNA for males and females in the different muscle tissues was between 0.5 and 1, whereas for other tissues it was less than 0.1. At day 70, the average relative abundance of MUSTN1 mRNA for males and females in the different muscle tissues was between 0.5 and 4.0, whereas for other tissues it was less than 0.1. At day 1, there were no differences between males and females in mRNA abundance of MUSTN1, however; expression in pectoralis major, thigh muscle and cardiac muscle was greater (p < 0.05) than other tissues. At day 70, mRNA abundance in pectoralis major, and thigh muscle of female chickens and cardiac muscle of male chickens were greater (p < 0.05) than all other tissues. At day 70, the expression of MUSTN1 in cardiac muscle was greater (p < 0.05) in male than female chickens, but lower in males as compared with females in pectoralis and thigh muscle (p < 0.05).
In addition to days 1 and 70, gene expression in muscle tissues of male and female chickens was also evaluated at days 28 and 49 post-hatch (Figure 2; Table 3). In male cardiac muscle, and both male and female pectoralis major muscle, MUSTN1 mRNA increased with age (p < 0.05). There was an age × sex × tissue interaction (p < 0.05) where female expression was greatest at 70 day in pectoralis major, while male expression was greatest at 49 d in pectoralis major muscle. In cardiac muscle, male MUSTN1 expression was greater in males than females at 49 and 70 day. There were no age-specific or gender-specific differences in expression in thigh muscle.
2.3. The Expression of MUSTN1 Protein in Muscle Tissues at Different Ages
We evaluated the abundance expression of MUSTN1 protein as influenced by tissue, age and sex of chickens (Figure 3). According to our western blotting, the estimated size of the MUSTN1 protein is 8.7 kilodaltons. Changes in mRNA abundance were reflected by similar changes in abundance of the protein. The expression of MUSTN1 protein was greater in thigh muscle than in pectoralis major at day 28 (p < 0.05), although cardiac muscle MUSTN1 protein abundance was not different from thigh muscle or pectoralis major muscle at 28 day. The average relative abundance of MUSTN1 protein in the different muscle tissues was between 0.3 and 0.5. In pectoralis major tissue of male chickens, the expression of MUSTN1 protein was greater at day 49 than day 28 (p < 0.05), but did not change between day 49 and day 70. In pectoralis major tissue, the expression of MUSTN1 protein was greater in female chickens than male chickens at day 70 (p < 0.05).
Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that MUSTN1 localizes to nuclei, which are peripherally-located in skeletal myofibers as confirmed by the nuclear counterstain (Figure 4; arrowheads). In the myocardium (Figure 4a1) staining appeared evenly distributed throughout the tissue in localized spots, as compared to the skeletal muscle. In the skeletal muscle (Figure 4a2), staining was localized to the periphery of the muscle fibers. Staining was not observed in negative controls (representative samples shown in Figure 4b1 and 4b2). To determine whether MUSTN1 protein staining co-localized with the nuclei, negative control samples were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Nuclear staining revealed that the distribution of nuclei was similar to staining patterns of MUSTN1, with nuclei distributed throughout the tissue in the cardiac muscle (Figure 4c1) and along the periphery of fibers in skeletal muscle (Figure 4c2).
Several studies revealed that the MUSTN1 gene is expressed exclusively in the musculoskeletal system [3,4,17], while others concluded that MUSTN1 is expressed widely across all tissues with an especially high expression in porcine muscle . Our results indicated that MUSTN1 mRNA was mainly expressed in cardiac muscle and skeletal muscle in chickens, and negligibly expressed in other tissues. This pattern is in agreement with the previous reports, emphasizing the abundance of MUSTN1 in skeletal muscle tissues . Zheng et al. observed a higher expression level of MUSTN1 in broilers than in layers. This is consistent with the theory that MUSTN1 plays an important role in skeletal muscle growth, a process that is accelerated in fast-growing chickens.
In addition to tissue-specific differences in gene expression, we also observed gender-specific differences and age-specific differences in the three muscle tissues that were examined in this study. In thigh muscle, a mixture of slow- and fast-twitch muscle fiber subtypes, expression of MUSTN1 was not influenced by age or sex. In pectoralis major, composed primarily of fast-twitch muscle fibers, expression increased with age in both males and females, with a peak in expression in males at 49 day and in females at 70 day. Changes in mRNA were reflected by similar changes in protein abundance, suggesting that protein translation events paralleled transcriptional regulation. The ontogenetic expression of the MUSTN1 gene in different chicken tissues adds further complexity to understanding the role of MUSTN1 in regulating muscle growth in birds. The expression pattern of MUSTN1 at day 1 and 28 was in agreement with . In our study, we extended the sampling periods to encompass the finishing stage of the EM Mountainous chicken, with additional time-points in muscle tissues. A temporal analysis of expression at different growth points indicated that differences in expression of MUSTN1 in cardiac muscle and skeletal muscle tissues may provide some clues about development of different muscle tissues. Cardiac muscle and skeletal muscle tissues belong to two different systems, the cardiovascular and musculoskeletal, respectively [18,19]. Several research reports suggested that MUSTN1 could regulate muscle hypertrophy [5–7]. Xu et al. also suggested that MUSTN1 may be associated with the rapid development of breast muscle in Pekin ducks. Our previous study also indicated that MUSTN1 may be closely linked with muscle hypertrophy .
There was an age × sex × muscle tissue interaction on MUSTN1 mRNA abundance that may shed some light on its function in different tissues. The pectoralis major showed a peculiar temporal pattern of mRNA expression in males. In females, mRNA abundance increased after day 49, whereas in males, expression peaked at day 49 and decreased to day 70. Because MUSTN1 was not developmentally regulated in thigh muscle, it may be that during the “finisher” stage of production in the EM chicken, differences in expression of MUSTN1 between males and females after the first six weeks post-hatch affect the growth of the breast muscle. According to the meat weight data, there is substantial growth of the breast muscle and leg muscle during the two later time points chosen for this trial. Interestingly, at the protein level, a decrease in MUSTN1 was not observed between day 49 and day 70 in pectoralis major of males. At the protein level, it increased and stayed high in males after day 28. Thus, after day 28 when the breast muscle was growing most rapidly, at the protein level, MUSTN1 increased and plateaued in males.
There were also age × sex interactions on muscle weights in EM chickens, where after day 28, weights of both leg and breast increased more dramatically in males as compared to females. Thus, these data suggest that the role of MUSTN1 in breast muscle growth should be evaluated in more depth in future studies.
The EM chickens belong to the family of Green legged chickens, which were developed on a large-scale farm in southwest China. About 60% (120 millions) of Green legged chickens are used to supply the niche poultry market each year. Thus it is important to evaluate the utility of EM chickens in further breeding for the niche poultry market. The live weights of EM chickens (1273.0 ± 197.7 g) were lower than reported values for White Plymouth Rocks (1959.9 ± 271.6 g) at 49-day . Muscle fiber diameters in 49-day-old EM chickens (32.5 ± 3.8 g) were smaller than 42-day-old Arbor Acres (AA) chickens (42.5 ± 1.2 g) . The EM chickens are Chinese quality chickens, which have been bred as pure lines for four generations by Sichuan Agricultural University. Understanding the factors regulating growth and development of EM chickens, which are regarded for their meat quality, will facilitate a greater understanding of the molecular and cellular signaling mechanisms underlying muscle hypertrophy. In the present study, MUSTN1 was highly expressed in the musculoskeletal tissues as compared to other tissue types, and immunoreactive MUSTN1 was localized to the nuclei of myocardium and skeletal muscle fibers (Figure 4). This finding is in agreement with other researchers, that MUSTN1 was localized to some peripherally-located nuclei in other species [3,14]. These data suggest that MUSTN1 works within the nucleus, possibly as a transcription factor. Further studies to elucidate MUSTN1 function will potentially lead to a better understanding of the regulatory mechanisms governing development of chicken skeletal muscle and heart. The data reported herein are consistent with MUSTN1 as a candidate gene for quantitative trait loci (QTL) controlling muscle growth in EM chickens, and further research is needed to dissect the mechanisms underlying the effect of MUSTN1 on muscle development.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Animal and Tissue
All experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care (National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences). Erlang Mountainous (EM) chickens were raised on the experimental farm for poultry breeding in Sichuan Agricultural University (Ya’an, China) between October and December, 2010. The SD02 line, described earlier , was used for this study. The experiment lasted until 70-days post-hatch, the age at which the chickens reached market weight (about 2000 g). Chickens were raised on floors with ad libitum access to feed and water. A 24 h light was provided throughout the experiment. Vaccination schedules management were the same reported by Zhao et al.. The ingredient and chemical composition of the diet satisfied the nutrient requirement standards for yellow feather chickens (Table 4).
The starter, grower and finisher periods of the chickens were divided into 1–28 days, 29–49 days, and 50–70 days, respectively. At the start and end of each growth phase (1, 28, 49 and 70 days), eight chickens were slaughtered (four females and four males). For mRNA/protein analysis, fourteen tissues including liver, spleen, lungs, kidney, brain, proventriculus, gizzard, gonads, jejunum, bursa of fabricius, pectoralis major, thigh muscle, subcutaneous fat and cardiac muscle were collected on day 1 and 70. Abdominal fat was collected on day 70. The pectoralis major, thigh muscle and cardiac muscle tissues were also collected on day 28 and 49. These samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until total RNA and protein extraction.
Pectoralis major and thigh muscle were collected at all four time points (1, 28, 49 and 70 day) for histology. Tissue specimens were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) for 18–24 h at 4 °C and routinely processed for paraffin embedding and serial sectioning into 5-μm thick sections for subsequent hematoxylin-eosin staining and immunohistochemistry. Sections stained by hematoxylin-eosin were used for evaluation of nuclei location.
4.2. Total RNA Isolation and cDNA Synthesis
Total RNA was isolated from liver, spleen, lung, kidney, brain, proventriculus, gizzard, gonad, jejunum, bursa of fabricius, pectoralis major, thigh muscle, abdominal fat, subcutaneous fat and cardiac muscle samples (about 100 mg from each sample) using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen Corp., Carlsbad, CA, USA) based on manufacturer’s instructions. Total RNA concentration and purity were determined at A260, 280, and 230 nm using NanoVue Plus, and RNA integrity was evaluated by agarose-formaldehyde electrophoresis.
The first strand cDNA was obtained using the ImProm-II Reverse Transcription System (TakaRa Biotechnology Co. Ltd., Dalian, China). The reaction was performed in a volume of 40 μL containing 8 μL of 5× PrimerScript Buffer, 2 μL of PrimerScript RT Enzyme Mix I, 1 μL of 50 μM Oligo dT forward and reverse primer, 2 μL of 100 μM Random 6 mers, 4 μL of total RNA (400 ng), and 22 μL RNase Free dH2O. The reverse transcription (RT) reaction was performed at 37 °C for 15 min with a final step of 85 °C for 15 s, and then stored at −20 °C.
4.3. Real-Time Quantitative PCR Assay for MUSTN1 mRNA Expression
The expression levels of chicken MUSTN1 mRNA (GenBank accession number NM_213580) at different stages of development in different tissues were measured by Real-time Quantitative PCR (qPCR). Expression of the chicken β-actin gene (GenBank accession number NM_205518) was used as internal control. Primers were designed and synthesized by TaKaRa Biotechnology Inc (Dalian, China) (Table 5). Amplicon specificity was confirmed by direct sequencing of the amplified fragments. The qPCR was carried out in a CFX96 (Bio-Rad, Inc., Richmond, CA, USA) qPCR system using IQ SYBR Green SuperMix (Bio-Rad, Inc., Richmond, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cycling conditions consisted of an initial denaturation step for 3 min at 95 °C, followed by 40 cycles of 10 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 60 °C, 30 s at 72 °C, followed by 5 min at 72 °C for final extension. A melting curve analysis was performed at a temperature of 65 °C to 95 °C, increasing at a rate of 0.5 °C/s. The qPCR reaction was performed in a volume of 20 μL, which included 10.0 μL 2× SYBR green SuperMix (Bio-Rad, Inc., Richmond, CA, USA), 2 μL of 10× diluted cDNA, 0.8 μL of forward and reverse primers (350 nM stocks), and 6.4 μL nuclease-free H2O. Each assay was conducted in triplicate in 96-well plates (Bio-Rad, Inc., Richmond, CA, USA). A NTC (no template control) for each primer set were included in each run. The range of amplification efficiencies of MUSTN1 and β-actin were from 95% to 105%.
4.4. Protein Extraction and Western Blotting
The pectoralis major, thigh muscle and cardiac muscle tissues were used for protein isolation with the BSP003 kit (Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China). Protein concentration was measured with Pierce bicinchoninic acid (BCA) Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) and Varioskan Flash instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). Total 30 μg protein was resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes. After blocking with 5% non-fat milk in 1× Tris-Buffered Saline with Tween (TBST) buffer for 1 h at room temperature, membranes were incubated with rabbit anti-Chicken MUSTN1 polyclonal antibody (Uscnlife Science Inc., Wuhan, China, 1:1000) and rabbit anti-Chicken GAPDH polyclonal antibody (Uscnlife Science Inc., Wuhan, China, 1:1000) overnight at 4 °C. The blots were then washed in 1× TBST buffer and probed with goat-anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated IgG secondary antibody (diluted 1:2000 in 1× TBST; Uscnlife Science Inc., Wuhan, China) for 1 h at room temperature. Binding was visualized with enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagent (ZOMANBIO Inc., Beijing, China) using a ChemiDoc XRS instrument (Bio-Rad, Inc., Richmond, CA, USA). Quantity One Software (Bio-Rad, Inc., Richmond, CA, USA) was used for densitometric analysis.
Immunohistochemical staining was performed using a standard avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex kit (Boster Inc., Wuhan, China). Skeletal muscle and heart tissues were fixed in formalin, embedded in paraffin, cut to 5 μm, mounted on slides and then deparaffinized using standard xylene and ethanol treatments. Sections were incubated with 3% hydrogen peroxide for 10 min to quench endogenous peroxidase activity and washed in distilled H2O. Two sequential series of boiling in sodium citrate followed by a wash with Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS; pH 7.4) were performed for antigen retrieval. Slides were blocked with 4% horse serum for 20 min and primary antibody, rabbit anti-chicken MUSTN1 polyclonal antibody (Uscnlife Science Inc., Wuhan, China, 1:100) diluted with PBS (pH 7.4) was applied and slides were incubated overnight at 4 °C. Slides were then incubated at 37 °C for 30 min and washed with PBS (pH 7.4) three times, and sequentially incubated with reagents from the Strept Avidin-Biotin Complex (SABC) Kit including biotin-conjugated affinipure goat anti-rabbit IgG (Boster Inc., Wuhan, China. 1:200) and Strept Actividin-Biotin Complex solution (Boster Inc., Wuhan, China. 1:200) at 37 °C for 20 min, and washed again with PBS (pH 7.4) three times. The staining was visualized with diaminobenzidine (Boster Inc., Wuhan, China), and the sections were dehydrated and mounted. Negative controls were incubated with PBS (pH 7.4) instead of primary antibody. Images were photographed and analyzed using a Nikon 50i microscope with Olympus camera and JD801 image analysis system. The images were captured at 400× magnification.
4.6. Muscle Measurements
Mounted muscle sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for measuring muscle fiber diameter and density. The muscle fiber diameter was measured from the fiber area. The muscle fiber density was calculated on videoprints by a special morphometric instrument, a motic microscope. Live weight, heart weight, breast (left pectoralis major and minor) and leg muscle weight (boneless left drum plus thigh), muscle fiber density and diameter were measured at each time point to evaluate meat traits.
4.7. Statistical Analyses
The 2−ΔΔCt (ΔCt = Ct of MUSTN1 − Ct β-actin, ΔΔCt = Δ Ct target − ΔCt calibrator) method of quantification  was used to calculate gene expression values. Using the GLM procedure of SAS 8.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA), we analyzed the differences in MUSTN1 expression between several tissues and at different time points by ANOVA. We used the Ct value of one chicken’s leg muscle at 70-day-old as the calibrator sample to calculate the relative difference in abundance of MUSTN1 mRNA. The statistical model of MUSTN1 mRNA/protein expression is as follows:
where Yijk: the expression of MUSTN1 measured at the observation value; μ: the mean; Si: the fixed effect of sex i; Aj: the fixed effect of age j; Tk: the fixed effect of tissue k; (SA)ij: the interaction effect of sex i by age j; (ST)ik: the interaction effect of sex i by tissue k; (AT)jk: the interaction effect of age j by tissue k; (SAT)ijk: the interaction effect of sex i by age j by tissue k; eijk: the residual random effect. Pairwise comparisons were carried out using the Tukey-Kramer multiple range test. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05.
Meat traits included live weight (LW), breast muscle weight (BMW), leg muscle weight (LMW), heart weight (HW), breast muscle fibre diameter (BFDM), leg muscle fibre diameter (LFDM), breast muscle density of muscle fiber (BFD) and muscle fiber (LFD). The statistical model for these variables is as follows: Yij = μ + Si + Aj + (SA)ij + eij, where Yij: the performance of chicken in sex i of age j; μ: the mean; Si: the fixed effect of sex i; Aj: the fixed effect of age j; (SA)ij: the interaction effect of sex i by age j; eij: the residual random effect.
In conclusion, these experiments suggest that the mRNA/protein expression of MUSTN1 is most abundant in skeletal muscle and heart and might be differentially regulated during chicken post-hatch muscle growth, suggesting a role in muscle development.
We thank Yao Zhang and Jang-Yuan Li for sample collection, and Ming Zhang for technical support. This work was financially supported by the Modern System of Agricultural Industry Technology (CARS-41), Ministry of Agriculture, China and the Twelfth Five-year Plan of Breeding (2011NZ0073), Department of Science and Technology, Sichuan province, China.
- Li, J.; Wang, C.; Kong, F.L.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, X.L.; Liu, Y.P.; Zhu, Q. Association study between the single nucleotide polymorphisms of MUSTN1 gene and carcass traits in chickens. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv 2012, 7, 1157–1165. [Google Scholar]
- Livne, E.; Laufer, D.; Blumenfeld, L. Differential response of articular cartilage from young growing and mature old mice to IL-1 and TGF-β. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr 1997, 24, 211–221. [Google Scholar]
- Lombardo, F.; Komatsu, D.; Hadjiargyrou, M. Molecular cloning and characterization of Mustang, a novel nuclear protein expressed during skeletal development and regeneration. FASEB J 2004, 18, 52–61. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, C.; Hadjiargyrou, M. Identification and characterization of the Mustang promoter: Regulation by AP-1 during myogenic differentiation. Bone 2006, 39, 815–824. [Google Scholar]
- Han, X.L.; Xu, X.W.; Liu, B. Molecular characteristics of the porcine MUSTN1 gene and its significant association with economic traits. J. Anim. Vet. Adv 2010, 9, 2351–2356. [Google Scholar]
- Zheng, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Yang, N.; Wang, X.J.; Zhu, D. Systematic identification of genes involved in divergent skeletal muscle growth rates of broiler and layer chickens. BMC Genomics 2009, 10, 87. [Google Scholar]
- Gersch, R.P. Characterization of Hox Gene Expression during Fracture Repair and the Functional Characterization of Mustn1 during Development and Chondrocyte Differentiation. Ph.D. Thesis, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Cornelison, D.D.W.; Wold, B.J. Single-cell analysis of regulatory gene expression in quiescent and activated mouse skeletal muscle satellite cells. Dev. Biol 1997, 191, 270–283. [Google Scholar]
- Cooper, R.N.; Tajbakhsh, S.; Mouly, V.; Cossu, G.; Buckingham, M.; Butler-Browne, G.S. In vivo satellite cell activation via Myf5 and MyoD in regenerating mouse skeletal muscle. J. Cell Sci 1999, 112, 2895–2901. [Google Scholar]
- Cornelison, D.D.W.; Olwin, B.B.; Rudnicki, M.A.; Wold, B.J. MyoD−/− satellite cells in single-fiber culture are differentiation defective and MRF4 deficient. Dev. Biol 2000, 224, 122–137. [Google Scholar]
- Asakura, A.; Rudnicki, M.A.; Komaki, M. Muscle satellite cells are multipotential stem cells that exhibit myogenic, osteogenic, and adipogenic differentiation. Differentiation 2001, 68, 245–253. [Google Scholar]
- Megeney, L.A.; Rudnicki, M.A. Determination versus differentiation and the MyoD family of transcription factors. Biochem. Cell. Biol 1995, 73, 723–732. [Google Scholar]
- Rudnicki, M.A.; Jaenisch, R. The MyoD family of transcription factors and skeletal myogenesis. BioEss 1995, 17, 203–209. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, C.; Gersch, R.P.; Hawke, T.J.; Hadjiargyrou, M. Silencing of Mustn1 inhibits myogenic fusion and differentiation. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol 2010, 298, C1100. [Google Scholar]
- Hadjiargyrou, M.; Lombardo, F.; Zhao, S.; Ahrens, W.; Joo, J.; Ahn, H.; Jurman, M.; White, D.W.; Rubin, C.T. Transcriptional profiling of bone regeneration. J. Biol. Chem 2002, 277, 30177–30182. [Google Scholar]
- Kostek, M.C.; Chen, Y.W.; Cuthbertson, D.J.; Shi, R.; Fedele, M.J.; Esser, K.A.; Rennie, M.J. Gene expression responses over 24 h to lengthening and shortening contractions in human muscle: Major changes in CSRP3, MUSTN1, SIX1, and FBXO32. Physiol. Genomics 2007, 31, 42–52. [Google Scholar]
- Gersch, R.P.; Hadjiargyrou, M. Mustn1 is expressed during chondrogenesis and is necessary for chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation in vitro. Bone 2009, 45, 330–338. [Google Scholar]
- Moore, R.L. Cellular adaptations of the heart muscle to exercise training. Ann. Med 1998, 30, 46–53. [Google Scholar]
- Salmons, S.; Henriksson, J. The adaptive response of skeletal muscle to increased use. Muscle Nerve 1981, 4, 94–105. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, T.; Huang, W.; Zhang, X.; Ye, B.; Zhou, H.; Hou, S. Identification and characterization of genes related to the development of breast muscles in Pekin duck. Mol. Biol. Rep 2012, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Zerehdaran, S.; Vereijken, A.L.; van Arendonk, J.A.; van Der Waaijt, E.H. Estimation of genetic parameters for fat deposition and carcass traits in broilers. Poult. Sci 2004, 83, 521–525. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, G.P.; Cui, H.X.; Liu, R.R.; Zheng, M.Q.; Chen, J.L.; Wen, J. Comparison of breast muscle meat quality in 2 broiler breeds. Poult. Sci 2011, 90, 2355–2359. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, X.L.; Siegel, P.B.; Liu, Y.P.; Wang, Y.; Gilbert, E.R.; Zhu, Q.; Zhang, L. Housing system affects broiler characteristics of local Chinese breed reciprocal crosses. Poult. Sci 2012, 91, 2405–2410. [Google Scholar]
- Schmittgen, T.D.; Livak, K.J. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat. Protoc 2008, 3, 1101–1108. [Google Scholar]
|Item||N||Meat weight 2||Meat trait 3|
|1||8||34.26 ± 2.27 d||2.07 ± 0.55 d||2.75 ± 0.63 d||0.20 ± 0.03 d||5.95 ± 1.36 c||6452.15 ± 740.19 a||9.23 ± 1.42 c||4785.79 ± 586.53 a|
|28||8||578.74 ± 109.81 c||23.90 ± 8.22 c||34.40 ± 6.38 c||2.51 ± 0.59 c||24.35 ± 0.46 b||1193.99 ± 153.80 b||25.80 ± 2.72 b||1004.96 ± 208.79 b|
|49||8||1273.01 ± 197.74 b||65.73 ± 13.35 b||83.54 ± 17.11 b||5.95 ± 0.67 b||32.45 ± 3.85 a||738.08 ± 244.90 b||28.84 ± 2.98 b||920.78 ± 90.95 b|
|70||8||2003.25±418.44 a||108.78 ± 9.02 a||143.61 ± 16.40 a||10.47 ± 1.67 a||36.72 ± 2.89 a||459.18 ± 65.97 b||37.37 ± 3.79 a||464.08 ± 81.96 b|
|Male||16||1120.01 ± 914.82 a||54.45 ± 46.58 a||73.10 ± 62.04 a||5.25 ± 4.56 a||24.95 ± 13.10||2319.68 ± 2718.44||25.44 ± 11.21||1884.40 ± 1950.36|
|female||16||824.62 ± 623.81 b||45.79 ± 38.81 b||59.05 ± 48.68 b||4.31 ± 3.52 b||24.85 ± 11.70||2102.02 ± 2412.51||25.18 ± 10.58||1703.41 ± 1679.97|
|Age × Sex||**||*||**||**||NS||NS||NS||NS|
1Values with different letters within a column differ significantly, lowercase denotes p < 0.05; “NS”: p > 0.05, “*”: p < 0.05, “**”: p < 0.01. Data are presented as mean ± SD;2LW = live weight (g); BMW = breast muscle weight (g); LMW = leg muscle weight (g); HW = heart weight (g);3BFDM = breast muscle fiber diameter (μm); BFD = breast muscle density of muscle fiber (fibers/mm2); LFDM = leg muscle fiber diameter (μm); LFD = leg muscle density of muscle fiber (fibers/mm2).
|Item||N||Meat weight 2|
|1||4||33.59 ± 2.17 e||34.94 ± 2.47 e||1.64 ± 0.36 f||2.50 ± 0.32 f||2.31 ± 0.51 f||3.19 ± 0.41 f||0.18 ± 0.03 e||0.21 ± 0.02 e|
|28||4||627.52 ± 35.20 d||529.97 ± 143.36 d||24.45 ± 7.55 e||23.35 ± 10.00 e||35.61 ± 2.82 e||33.19 ± 9.11 e||2.92 ± 0.13 d||2.11 ± 0.59 d|
|49||4||1434.43 ± 87.17 b||1111.59 ± 118.97 c||74.50 ± 9.19 c||56.95 ± 1.21 d||95.53 ± 13.53 c||71.55 ± 10.81 d||5.85 ± 0.72 c||6.04 ± 0.72 c|
|70||4||2384.50 ± 121.44 a||1622.00 ± 78.76 b||117.22 ± 19.26 a||100.35 ± 16.38 b||158.96 ± 21.29 a||128.27 ± 15.23 b||12.90 ± 0.13 a||8.90 ± 1.02 b|
1Values with different letters within a trait differ significantly, lowercase denotes the 0.05 level. Data are presented as mean ± SD;2LW = live weight (g); BMW = breast muscle weight (g); LMW = leg muscle weight (g); HW = heart weight (g).
|Item||Number||mRNA abundance 1|
|1||24||0.78 ± 0.24 b|
|28||24||0.70 ± 0.35 b|
|49||24||1.70 ± 0.38 a|
|70||24||1.90 ± 0.37 a|
|Female||48||1.13 ± 0.49|
|Male||48||1.41 ± 0.40|
|Pectoralis||32||1.48 ± 0.49 a|
|Thigh muscle||32||1.47 ± 0.36 a|
|Cardiac muscle||32||0.86 ± 0.32 b|
|Sex × Tissue||NS|
|Sex × Age||**|
|Tissue × Age||*|
|Sex × Age × Tissue||**|
1Values with different letters within the main effect differ significantly, lowercase indicates p < 0.05; “NS”: p > 0.05, “*”: p < 0.05, “**”: p < 0.01. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
|Starter (day 1 to 28)||Grower (day 29 to 49)||Finisher (day 50 to 70)|
|Distiller’s dried grains with solubles||50.00||50.00||70.00|
|Vitamin trace mineral premix||0.30||0.30||0.30|
|Mineral additive 1||5.00||5.00||5.00|
1Provided mineral additive per kilogram of complete diet in the starter, grower and finisher stages: FeSO4·7H2O 0.43 g, CuSO4·5H2O 0.08 g, MnSO4·H2O 0.26 g, ZnSO4·7H2O 0.47 g, KI 0.01 g, Na2SeO3 0.03 g, Carrier CaCO3 3.72 g.
|Primer name||Primer sequences (5′–3′)||Annealing temperature (°C)||Product length (bp)|
© 2013 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).