Next Article in Journal
Extracts from European Propolises as Potent Tyrosinase Inhibitors
Next Article in Special Issue
Treatment of High-Polyphenol-Content Waters Using Biotechnological Approaches: The Latest Update
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis and Pesticidal Activity of New Niacinamide Derivatives Containing a Flexible, Chiral Chain
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dihydrochalcones in Sweet Tea: Biosynthesis, Distribution and Neuroprotection Function
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 28
Issue 1
10.3390/molecules28010056
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhancement of the Functional Properties of Mead Aged with Oak (Quercus) Chips at Different Toasting Levels

by
Juciane Prois Fortes
1,2,
Fernanda Wouters Franco
1,2,
Julia Baranzelli
1,2,
Gustavo Andrade Ugalde
3,
Cristiano Augusto Ballus
1,
Eliseu Rodrigues
4,
Márcio Antônio Mazutti
5,
Sabrina Somacal
1,2,* and
Claudia Kaehler Sautter
1,2
1
Graduate Program on Food Science and Technology, Center of Rural Sciences, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS 97105-900, Brazil
2
Integrated Centre for Laboratory Analysis Development (NIDAL), Department of Food Technology and Science, Center of Rural Sciences, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS 97105-900, Brazil
3
Graduate Program on Pharmaceutical Sciences, Center of Health Sciences, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS 97105-900, Brazil
4
Department of Food Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS 91501-970, Brazil
5
Department of Chemical Engineering, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS 97105-900, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(1), 56; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28010056
Submission received: 15 November 2022 / Revised: 7 December 2022 / Accepted: 14 December 2022 / Published: 21 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Polyphenols in Human Health)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Consumers increasingly prefer and seek functional beverages, which, given their characteristics, provide important bioactive compounds that help prevent and treat chronic diseases. Mead is a traditional fermented alcoholic beverage made from honey solution. The aging process of mead with oak chips is innovative and bestows functional characteristics to this beverage. Thus, in this study, we sought to develop and characterize a novel functional beverage by combining the health benefits of honey with the traditional aging process of alcoholic beverages in wood. Phenolic compounds, flavonoids, and antioxidant capacity were analyzed in mead using oak chips at different toasting levels and aged for 360 days. LC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS was used to analyze the chemical profile of different meads. Over time, the aging process with oak chips showed a higher total phenolic and flavonoid content and antioxidant capacity. Eighteen compounds belonging to the classes of organic acids, phenolic acids, flavonoids, and tannins were identified in meads after 360 days. Our findings revealed that the addition of oak chips during aging contributed to p-coumaric, ellagic, abscisic, and chlorogenic acids, and naringenin, vanillin, and tiliroside significantly impacted the functional quality of mead.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The increased prevalence of noncommunicable diseases in recent years has made consumers increasingly aware of healthy and natural diets [1]. Consequently, the food and beverages industry faces new challenges in designing functional foods. Among the different types of functional foods, beverages are the most acceptable due to logistic facilities, their distribution, and the ease of incorporating bioactive compounds as functional ingredients [2]. Furthermore, functional beverages have gained more market shares over the last decade [3].
Recently, wine and beer, two of the most popular alcoholic beverages, have been identified as functional beverages, and the benefits of their moderate consumption have been widely supported by the scientific community [4]. The main source of the beneficial potential of consuming these beverages is phenolic compounds. After consuming phenolic-compound-rich foods, such as functional beverages, the colon is the leading site of microbial fermentation. Intestinal microbiota transforms phenolic compounds into phenolic acids or lactone structures, which produce metabolites with biological and antioxidant activity, and evidence suggests that these metabolites have health benefits for humans [3,5,6].
Mead or honey wine is a beverage traditionally produced by diluting honey in water and yeast and may present some variations through the addition of fruit or fruit juice, herbs, or spices [7]. Fermentation and maturation/aging are the two most time-consuming processes in mead production, often lasting a few days to months [8]. The final composition of the mead will depend on the type of honey used, the ingredients added, and the fermentation and storage conditions [9]. Mead has been produced since ancient times, especially in Eastern European countries; however, it is currently not as popular as other alcoholic beverages, highlighting the need for further research on this beverage and its potential functionality [10].
Honey is widely known for its health-promoting biological characteristics such as its anti-inflammatory, antiviral, antifungal, and antitumor properties [11]. Among the bioactive descriptors in honey, phenolic compounds, organic acids, carbohydrates, amino acids, proteins, minerals, vitamins, and lipids stand out [11,12], which directly influence the chemical and sensory characteristics of the mead [8,9,12]. Nevertheless, the composition of honey is quite variable and relies on the floral source and seasonal and environmental conditions, in addition to the processing and storage techniques used [9,11].
The aging process of alcoholic beverages in wood provides various changes in the composition and concentration of compounds in beverages [13,14]. Such modifications may be noticeable by changes in the beverages’ taste, color, and aroma. In addition to sensory changes, many phenolic compounds are acquired or elevated during maturation [13,15]. Martínez et al. (2008) tested different quenching methods on the chemical composition of American (Quercus alba) and French (Quercus petraea) oak, and their findings showed the evolution of ellagitannins, a low molecular weight phenolic compound, and volatile compounds regarding oak species and the tempering method [16]. The natural process in the open air was considered superior to the artificial and mixed drying methods, as it showed greater effectiveness in reducing excess ellagitannins. In addition, the evolution of the aromatic potential of the wood was more positive, reaching higher concentrations of compounds such as volatile phenols, phenolic aldehydes, furanic compounds, and cis- and trans-methyl-γ-octalactones. The wood toasting process takes place after tempering, where the wood is subjected to temperatures in the range of 150–240 °C for a certain period, according to the desired toasting level. In this step, thermal degradation reactions occur, transforming nonvolatile precursors into active aromatic volatile compounds [17].
Due to technological advances in the maturation/aging area of alcoholic beverages, alternative systems using wooden barrels to carry out this process have emerged. Staves, chips, shavings, and other alternative sources of extraction of compounds from oak or other species of forest wood have become common for the maturation and aging process of alcoholic beverages, generating a new use of wood residues in the cooperage [15,18].
Thus, this study aimed to develop a functional mead with multifloral honey and submit it to the aging process with oak chips (Quercus), a wood commonly used for the maturation and aging of alcoholic beverages that can provide bioactive compounds. In addition, we sought to evaluate the phenolic compounds content and antioxidant capacity after fermentation and identify the phytochemical compounds in mead aged with oak chips at two toasting levels.

2. Results and Discussion

Functional beverages can be a valuable component of the human diet given their ability to provide essential hydration and important bioactive compounds for maintaining health and/or contributing to preventing and treating chronic diseases [1,2,5,6]. Mead is a beverage that has been gaining more and more notoriety over time, although there are few studies on it; hence, this study is unprecedented as it presents data from meads aged with oak chips, a process so far only used for other types of alcoholic beverages [13] and which can improve the functionality of this beverage. In this study, the antioxidant capacity, total phenolic and flavonoid content, and characterization of phytochemical compounds of meads subjected to a 360-day aging period with oak chips (Quercus) at different toasting levels were determined.
Honey is a source of numerous biologically active compounds, including phenolic and volatile compounds, peptides, proteins, amino acids, enzymes, and minerals, which can be transferred to the mead during production [12]. Among all the substances, our attention was given to the phenolic compounds, which contribute to the mead functional quality. This phytochemical group includes flavonoids, tannins, and phenolic acids, which are natural antioxidants that play significant roles in the human body due to their capability to inhibit free radicals, which may cause cell damage, leading to chronic diseases [2,3,19]. Beverages are considered good dietary sources of phenolic compounds; moreover, the phenolic compounds in beverages are highly bioaccessible because they pass directly into intestinal fluids [5], making this study highly innovative in carrying out the aging process of mead with oak chips and monitoring it over time.
At time zero, all elaborated meads had a similar content of phenolic compounds, which came from the honey used (Figure 1). In the base mead (BM), these values remained constant for up to 180 days and then decreased with advancing maturation time. Meads with chips addition showed higher total phenolic compound levels until the aging period of 180 days. This increase may be related to the extraction of phenolic compounds from oak into mead throughout the maturation process. Canas et al. (2019) observed higher total phenolic compounds in wine spirits aged for 180 days with oak staves [20]. This increase was due to the combination of the thermal degradation of lignin and increased wood permeability during thermal treatment. Mead is still poorly studied, although due to its characteristics similar to young white wines, aging time may have provided oxidative reactions and/or condensation between the mead compounds with some wood molecules, reducing the phenolic compounds after 270 days of aging.
Furthermore, flavonoids gradually increased in meads with oak chips throughout the aging period, with a maximum content at 270 days (Figure 2). We observed that the concentration of this class of phenolic compounds varied from 10.6 mg to 20.5 mg CAE L−1. Regardless of the toasting degree, the oak chips increased the mead flavonoids concentrations, which may have contributed to increasing the antioxidant capacity throughout the aging process (Figure 3) since these compounds have high free radical scavenging potential, as described elsewhere [8,19].
The antioxidant capacity of meads depends on the raw material’s chemical composition, the environmental factors that directly affect the honey production process, and the technologies used to process it [8,9]. Apart from technological processes such as fermentation and aging, these beverages’ antioxidant properties and chemical composition are determined by the additives used in their manufacturing [8]. In this investigation, the antioxidant capacity was determined with a 2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline) 6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) assay and varied from 1.31 to 5.06 mM of Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity per liter (TEAC L−1), showing a significant increase after 270 days of aging in meads with the addition of the oak chips (Figure 3). In meads, the antioxidant capacity is related to the presence of phenolic compounds, and the diversity of these compounds is directly linked to the honey used [8]. Hence, meads that only use honey and water in their composition tend to have lower compound diversity.
Nevertheless, meads with the addition of fruit juices or herbal extracts have a wider range of these phytochemicals [12]. The profile of the antioxidant capacity is a concomitant event to the behavior of the flavonoid content over time (Figure 2 and Figure 3), especially at 270 days. A similar behavior was observed in unripened meads and other wood-aged beverages [10,21]. However, one cannot rule out the possibility that other bioactive compounds, in addition to flavonoids, contributed to the antioxidant capacity observed in the final aging period of meads with oak chips in this investigation. Phenolic compounds are found in plants as they come from their secondary metabolism. Bees, by collecting pollen, transfer many of these compounds to the honey; consequently, these phytochemicals will be present in the mead, even in smaller amounts [9,11]. The Brazilian flora is vast, generating honeys with various phenolic compounds, with a predominance of many phenolic acids such as 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic, salicylic, caffeic, chlorogenic, p-coumaric, ferulic, gallic, syringic acids, and flavonoids including isorhamnetin, kaempferol, luteolin, naringenin, pinobanksin, quercetin, and rutin [22].
In this study, the phenolic compounds in the meads at the end of 360 days of aging were identified through MS/MS mass spectrometry analysis by combining the chromatographic behavior and collision spectra with compounds already described in the literature. Eighteen compounds belonging to the classes of organic acids, phenolic acids, flavonoids, and tannins were tentatively identified and are listed in Table 1 and in the Supplementary Material (Figure S1).
Among the compounds identified are citric acid, protocatechuic acid, sinapyl alcohol, syringic acid, ethylvanillin, 1-(2-hydroxy-4,6-dimethoxyphenyl)-ethanone, sebacic acid, and quercetin in all samples, which are therefore compounds from the honey used in the beverage’s elaboration. Adding oak chips during aging, regardless of the toasting, contributed to vanillin, p-coumaric acid, ellagic acid, abscisic acid, and naringenin. However, chlorogenic acid and tiliroside were only present in the meads aged with oak chips without toasting (MOWT) and meads aged with oak chips at high toasting (MOHT). Various studies have demonstrated that chlorogenic acids are partially bioavailable and potentially beneficial to human health [6]. The antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of coffee chlorogenic acids are responsible for, at least to a certain extent, the association between coffee consumption and the lower incidence of various degenerative and nondegenerative diseases, in addition to higher longevity [6]. 2,3-Dihydroxy-1-guaiacylpropanone was only found in the BM, and the 3-hydroxy-3-(3-hydroxyphenyl) propionic acid was found in the BM and mead aged with oak chips without toasting (MOWT).
During the aging process, the transformations of lignin, present in woods such as French oak, are among the most important factors that affect the quality of beverages aged in contact with this material. Lignin is a polymer that undergoes thermal degradation during the manufacturing of barrels or by hydrolysis and ethanollysis during the aging of wines and alcoholic beverages [30]. The lignin macromolecule has ramifications of coniferyl alcohols (guaiacyl compounds) and sinapyl (syringyl compounds). Coniferyl alcohol generates coniferylaldehydes, which are converted into vanillin, while sinapyl alcohol gives rise to sinapaldehyde, which is transformed into syringaldehyde and later oxidized to syringic acid. Other compounds, such as hydrolyzable tannins, present in French oak, are more soluble in hydroalcoholic solutions; its transformation into ellagic acid is very common [31], corroborating the identification of this compound only in meads with the addition of oak chips.
In the present investigation, meads aged with oak chips showed a higher phenolic compound content and diversity. It is known that these compounds may be related to physicochemical and sensory characteristics in foods [8,12]. Thus, the sensory evaluation of meads is important to know the impact of compounds on sensory aspects, including color, flavor, and astringency. The absence of a sensory evaluation of different meads is one of the limitations of this study. These analyses were scheduled to be carried out in 2020–2021, and the study had already been approved by the institutional ethics committee (CAAE no. 58889316.3.0000.5346). Unfortunately, given the restrictions imposed by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, it was impossible to carry out the analyses. Until now, the classic wood-aging method employed in numerous alcoholic beverages has not yet been tested in mead. Hence, despite the absence of a sensory evaluation, this study is pioneering and can contribute to essential elucidations in the field of functional beverages.
Mead is a traditional alcoholic beverage obtained by the fermentation of mead wort and popularly produced at home and in small meaderies. Different types of mead can be distinguished based on the honey-to-water ratio, the addition of spices and/or fruits, and the method of wort preparation [8,10,12]. The consumption of mead has gained popularity given the presence of its natural and high-quality bioactive compounds. As a result, mead production and consumption have remarkably increased during the past years [8]. The regular consumption of foods and beverages rich in bioactive compounds has been associated with a series of beneficial health effects [1,2], although, in the case of mead, in addition to these compounds, this beverage also has a considerable alcohol content (8–18%) [8,10,12]. The excessive and prolonged use of alcoholic beverages is significantly linked to mild symptoms such as fatigue, difficulty walking, fainting, and behavioral changes. In addition, long-term consumption is responsible for serious health problems such as depression, anxiety, impaired cognitive performance, and liver diseases (e.g., alcoholic hepatitis and liver cirrhosis), which is considered one of the main causes of death and functional disability in the world [32,33]. Given the above, the moderate consumption of mead and other alcoholic beverages is suggested.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Analytical Reagents

HPLC-grade methanol used for the mobile phase was obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). HPLC-grade acetonitrile and formic acid used for the mobile phase were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). HPLC-grade water was obtained from a Milli-Q system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). ABTS (2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline) 6-sulfonic acid) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

3.2. Experimental Design

The experimental design was completely randomized with four treatments and five sampling units for each treatment (Table 2).

3.3. Samples Acquirement

To produce the mead we used multifloral honey from an apiary located in Santiago city (29.1991393′ S and 54.8644842′ W, 467 m) in the central region of Rio Grande do Sul, Southern Brazil. It has an area of 2,413 km2 of foraging, and the climate is classified as humid subtropical, with an annual average temperature of between 18 and 20 °C and an average annual rainfall of 359 mm. For the aging of mead, we utilized oak chips (Quercus) purchased from WE Consultoria (Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil).
The mead was prepared with multifloral honey and water until it reached 21° Brix; then, it was inoculated with 20 hg L−1 of the Saccharomyces baianus yeast strain and 30 hg L−1 of nutrients (Nutristart). Fermentation was carried out in a glass fermenter with a capacity of 30 L with the system maintained under anaerobic conditions through the water seal at a constant temperature of 20 °C, and it was monitored daily by measuring the total soluble solids content and initial and final density. The end of the fermentation process occurred at 27 days with the cessation of carbon dioxide evolution followed by the stabilization of total soluble solids and the stabilization of density. The mead was then stabilized for 15 days at 16 °C. The time between fermentation and the beginning of aging was 45 days. In the last step, the mead was sulfited at 50 ppm and bottled in 300 mL bottles with the addition of 2 g L−1 of oak chips (Quercus) followed by the aging process. Aliquots were taken every 90 days for up to 360 days to analyze the content of the total phenolic compounds, total flavonoids, and antioxidant capacity. At the end of the 360 days of aging, the phenolic compounds in the different meads were identified.

3.4. Total Phenolic Content

The total phenolic compounds in each mead sample were quantified with spectrophotometry through the redox reaction with the Folin–Ciocalteu reagent [34]. The readings of the samples were performed in triplicate of the absorbances in a UV–visible spectrophotometer (FEMTO 600 plus) at a wavelength of 765 nm after they were left to rest for two hours at room temperature. The phenolic compounds content was calculated by interpolating the absorbance of the samples against the calibration curve constituted with a standard of gallic acid (0–80 mg L−1), and the results are expressed in milligrams of gallic acid equivalent per liter (mg GAE L−1).

3.5. Flavonoids Content

Flavonoid compound determination was performed according to the method of Zhishen, Mengcheng, and Jianming (1999) [35]. The absorbance readings were performed in triplicate with a UV–visible spectrophotometer (FEMTO 600 plus) at 550 nm. The flavonoid concentration in the meads was calculated by interpolating the data with the calibration curve constituted with the catechin standard (0–250 mg L−1), and the results were expressed in milligrams of catechin equivalent per liter (mg CAE L−1).

3.6. Antioxidant Capacity Determination

The antioxidant capacity of meads was determined with the ABTS method using the method described by Re et al. (1999) [36]. The absorbance readings of the samples were taken 6 min after the reaction in a UV–visible spectrophotometer (FEMTO® 600 plus) at 750 nm. The ABTS concentration was calculated from a calibration curve using Trolox as the standard (0–0.2 mM TEAC L−1). Readings were performed in triplicate, and the results are expressed as mM of Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity per liter (mM TEAC L −1).

3.7. Purification Procedure in SPE C18

Samples were purified prior to performing the LC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS analysis. Sample purification was performed according to the method described by Rodriguez-Saona and Wrolstad (2001) with adaptations [37,38]. The mead samples (6 mL) were placed in a rotary evaporator (Büchi, Essen, Germany) at 35 °C for five minutes to remove the alcohol present in the sample. Afterward, the sample was loaded into C-18 solid phase extraction (SPE) cartridges (cartridges SPE-C18, Strata C18-E, Phenomenex), previously activated with methanol and conditioned with acidified water (0.1% v/v formic acid). The polar compounds were washed with two volumes of aqueous formic acid solution (0.1% v/v). Fewer polar phenolic compounds were eluted with two volumes of ethyl acetate (3 mL). The ethyl acetate fraction was dried on a rotary evaporator and made up to a known volume (1 mL) with acidified methanol (0.1% v/v formic acid) and acidified water (0.1% v/v formic acid) (200 + 800 µL). All fractions were analyzed directly as purified fractions in a chromatograph.

3.8. Phenolic Compound Identification by LC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS

The method to identify the phenolic compounds was based on Quatrin et al. (2019) [39]. The liquid chromatography (LC) instrument (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) was connected in series to a DAD detector (SPD-M20A) and a mass spectrometer (MS) with a Quadrupole-Time-of-Flight (QTOF) analyzer and an electrospray ionization source (ESI) (Bruker Daltonics, micrOTOF-Q III, Bremen, Germany). A 20 µL sample was injected into a reversed-phase column (C-18 Hypersil Gold, 5 μm particle size, 150 mm, 4.6 mm; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Mobile phase A for this method consisted of ultrapure water with formic acid acidified methanol (95:5:0.1 v/v); mobile phase B was acetonitrile and formic acid (99.9:0.1 v/v). The ESI conditions were a capillary voltage of −4500 V (negative), nebulizer gas pressure at 30 psi, dry gas at 11 mL min−1, and gas temperature at 310 °C. The MS/MS experiments were performed in a full scan range of 100–1800 m/z of all fragments formed from 3 major parent ions per second. The LC solutions software (Version 3, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) was used to process the data obtained. The tentative identification of compounds was based on the combined information of elution order, ultraviolet–visible (UV–Vis) spectra, and mass spectrometry fragmentation patterns. These data were compared to literature data and public databases (PubChem, KEGG, MassBank of North America (MoNA), ChemSpider, Phenol-Explorer, and FooDB).

3.9. Statistical Analysis

All analytical results were selected for an analysis of variance (ANOVA). The comparison of posthoc mean analysis was performed with a Tukey’s test at 5% error probability using Statistica 9.0 software (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK, USA); the graphs were made using the GraphPad Prism 6.0 software (Dotmatics, San Diego, CA, USA).

4. Conclusions

The highly innovative process of using oak chips to improve mead characteristics has not yet been described in the literature. Oak chips increase phenolic compound variability in mead, their flavonoid content, and their antioxidant capacity over storage time. Our findings revealed that mead aged with oak chips as a beverage has more potential for beneficial biological activity due to the higher phenolic compound content than mead without oak chips. Therefore, the use of oak chips in the mead aging process, regardless of toasting levels, improved the functional quality of the beverage.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules28010056/s1, Figure S1: Representative chromatogram of mead aged with oak chips.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.P.F. and C.K.S.; data curation, J.P.F., S.S. and C.K.S.; formal analysis, J.P.F., F.W.F., J.B. and G.A.U.; funding acquisition, E.R., M.A.M. and C.K.S.; investigation, J.P.F., F.W.F., J.B. and S.S.; methodology, J.P.F., F.W.F., J.B., G.A.U., C.A.B. and M.A.M.; project administration, C.K.S.; supervision, C.A.B., E.R., S.S. and C.K.S.; validation, F.W.F., E.R. and M.A.M.; writing—original draft, J.P.F.; writing—review and editing, S.S. and C.K.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financed in part by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, Brazil) [grant number 475597/2010-9], Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES, Brazil) [finance code 001], and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS, RS, Brazil) [grant number 17/2551-0000949-5].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are openly available in the Harvard Dataverse at doi: 10.7910/DVN/MBWA4J.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

All meads samples are available from the authors.

References

  1. Sethi, G.; Vidyalaya, K.M.; Raina, A.; Vidyalaya, K.M. Consumers’ Awareness about Nutritional Aspects of Healthy Food: A Qualitative Study. Universe Int. J. Interdiscip. Res. 2020, 2020, 438–443. [Google Scholar]
  2. Zaidel, D.N.A.; Muhamad, I.I.; Hashim, Z.; Jusoh, Y.M.M.; Salleh, E. Innovation and Challenges in the Development of Functional and Medicinal Beverages. In Functional Foods and Nutraceuticals for Human Health; Apple Academic Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2021; pp. 137–198. [Google Scholar]
  3. Cong, L.; Bremer, P.; Mirosa, M. Functional Beverages in Selected Countries of Asia Pacific Region: A Review. Beverages 2020, 6, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Radonjić, S.; Maraš, V.; Raičević, J.; Košmerl, T. Wine or Beer? Comparison, Changes and Improvement of Polyphenolic Compounds during Technological Phases. Molecules 2020, 25, 4960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Cantele, C.; Rojo-Poveda, O.; Bertolino, M.; Ghirardello, D.; Cardenia, V.; Barbosa-Pereira, L.; Zeppa, G. In Vitro Bioaccessibility and Functional Properties of Phenolic Compounds from Enriched Beverages Based on Cocoa Bean Shell. Foods 2020, 9, 715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Farah, A.; dePaula Lima, J. Consumption of Chlorogenic Acids through Coffee and Health Implications. Beverages 2019, 5, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Kahoun, D.; Řezková, S.; Královský, J. Effect of Heat Treatment and Storage Conditions on Mead Composition. Food Chem. 2017, 219, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Starowicz, M.; Granvogl, M. Trends in Food Science & Technology an Overview of Mead Production and the Physicochemical, Toxicological, and Sensory Characteristics of Mead with a Special Emphasis on Flavor. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 106, 402–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Akalın, H.; Bayram, M.; Anlı, R.E. Determination of Some Individual Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Capacity of Mead Produced from Different Types of Honey. J. Inst. Brew. 2017, 123, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Bednarek, M.; Szwengiel, A. Distinguishing between Saturated and Unsaturated Meads Based on Their Chemical Characteristics. LWT 2020, 133, 109962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cianciosi, D.; Forbes-Hernández, T.; Afrin, S.; Gasparrini, M.; Reboredo-Rodriguez, P.; Manna, P.; Zhang, J.; Bravo Lamas, L.; Martínez Flórez, S.; Agudo Toyos, P.; et al. Phenolic Compounds in Honey and Their Associated Health Benefits: A Review. Molecules 2018, 23, 2322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Švecová, B.; Bordovská, M.; Kalvachová, D.; Hájek, T. Analysis of Czech Meads: Sugar Content, Organic Acids Content and Selected Phenolic Compounds Content. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2015, 38, 80–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rubio-Bretón, P.; Garde-Cerdán, T.; Martínez, J. Use of Oak Fragments during the Aging of Red Wines. Effect on the Phenolic, Aromatic, and Sensory Composition of Wines as a Function of the Contact Time with the Wood. Beverages 2018, 4, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Martínez-Gil, A.M.; del Alamo-Sanza, M.; del Barrio-Galán, R.; Nevares, I. Alternative Woods in Oenology: Volatile Compounds Characterisation of Woods with Respect to Traditional Oak and Effect on Aroma in Wine, a Review. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 2101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fernández de Simón, B.; Cadahía, E.; del Álamo, M.; Nevares, I. Effect of Size, Seasoning and Toasting in the Volatile Compounds in Toasted Oak Wood and in a Red Wine Treated with Them. Anal. Chim. Acta 2010, 660, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Martínez, J.; Cadahía, E.; Fernández de Simón, B.; Ojeda, S.; Rubio, P. Effect of the Seasoning Method on the Chemical Composition of Oak Heartwood to Cooperage. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 3089–3096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Farrell, R.R.; Wellinger, M.; Gloess, A.N.; Nichols, D.S.; Breadmore, M.C.; Shellie, R.A.; Yeretzian, C. Real-Time Mass Spectrometry Monitoring of Oak Wood Toasting: Elucidating Aroma Development Relevant to Oak-Aged Wine Quality. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 17334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Fernández de Simón, B.; Muiño, I.; Cadahía, E. Characterization of Volatile Constituents in Commercial Oak Wood Chips. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 9587–9596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sharifi-Rad, M.; Anil Kumar, N.V.; Zucca, P.; Varoni, E.M.; Dini, L.; Panzarini, E.; Rajkovic, J.; Tsouh Fokou, P.V.; Azzini, E.; Peluso, I.; et al. Lifestyle, Oxidative Stress, and Antioxidants: Back and Forth in the Pathophysiology of Chronic Diseases. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11, 694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Canas, S.; Caldeira, I.; Anjos, O.; Belchior, A.P. Phenolic Profile and Colour Acquired by the Wine Spirit in the Beginning of Ageing: Alternative Technology Using Micro-Oxygenation vs Traditional Technology. LWT 2019, 111, 260–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Laqui-Estaña, J.; López-Solís, R.; Peña-Neira, Á.; Medel-Marabolí, M.; Obreque-Slier, E. Wines in Contact with Oak Wood: The Impact of the Variety (Carménère and Cabernet Sauvignon), Format (Barrels, Chips and Staves), and Aging Time on the Phenolic Composition. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 436–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Seraglio, S.K.T.; Valese, A.C.; Daguer, H.; Bergamo, G.; Azevedo, M.S.; Gonzaga, L.V.; Fett, R.; Costa, A.C.O. Development and Validation of a LC-ESI-MS/MS Method for the Determination of Phenolic Compounds in Honeydew Honeys with the Diluted-and-Shoot Approach. Food Res. Int. 2016, 87, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ma, C.; Dunshea, F.R.; Suleria, H.A. LC-ESI-QTOF/MS Characterization of Phenolic Compounds in Palm Fruits (Jelly and Fishtail Palm) and Their Potential Antioxidant Activities. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Xu, S.; Zhu, J.; Zhao, Q.; Hardie, J.; Hu, B. Changes in the Profile of Aroma Compounds in Vitis vinifera L. Cv Merlot from Grapes to Wine. Bangladesh J. Bot. 2017, 46, 1089–1098. [Google Scholar]
  25. Simonelt, B.R.T.; Rogge, W.F.; Mazurek, M.A.; Standley, L.J.; Hildemann, L.M.; Cass, G.R. Lignin Pyrolysis Products, Lignans, and Resin Acids as Specific Tracers of Plant Classes in Emissions from Biomass Combustion. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1993, 27, 2533–2541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Abdulsallam, B.; Ohood Hasan, A.; Nael Abu, T.; Ali, A.-R.; Sachil, K. Chemical Composition of Propolis from the Baha Region in Saudi Arabia. Czech J. Food Sci. 2018, 36, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Maia, I.R.D.O.; Trevisan, M.T.S.; Silva, M.G.D.V.; Breuer, A.; Owen, R.W. Characterization and Quantitation of Polyphenolic Compounds in Senna macranthera Var Pudibunda from the Northeast of Brazil. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2019, 14, 1934578X1985170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Isidorov, V.A.; Czyżewska, U.; Jankowska, E.; Bakier, S. Determination of Royal Jelly Acids in Honey. Food Chem. 2011, 124, 387–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lucas, C.I.S.; Ferreira, A.F.; Costa, M.A.P.D.C.; Silva, F.D.L.; Estevinho, L.M.; Carvalho, C.A.L.D. Phytochemical Study and Antioxidant Activity of Dalbergia ecastaphyllum. Rodriguésia 2020, 71, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Le Floch, A.; Jourdes, M.; Teissedre, P.-L. Polysaccharides and Lignin from Oak Wood Used in Cooperage: Composition, Interest, Assays: A Review. Carbohydr. Res. 2015, 417, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mosedale, J.; Puech, J.-L. Wood Maturation of Distilled Beverages. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 1998, 9, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Niemelä, O.; Aalto, M.; Bloigu, A.; Bloigu, R.; Halkola, A.S.; Laatikainen, T. Alcohol Drinking Patterns and Laboratory Indices of Health: Does Type of Alcohol Preferred Make a Difference? Nutrients 2022, 14, 4529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, S.-C.; Chen, Y.-C.; Chen, S.-J.; Lee, C.-H.; Cheng, C.-M. Alcohol Addiction, Gut Microbiota, and Alcoholism Treatment: A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Singleton, V.L.; Rossi, J.A. Colorimetry of Total Phenolics with Phosphomolybdic-Phosphotungstic Acid Reagents. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1965, 16, 144–158. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhishen, J.; Mengcheng, T.; Wu, J. The Determination of Flavonoid Contents in Mulberry and Their Scavenging Effects on Superoxide Radicals. Food Chem. 1999, 64, 555–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Re, R.; Pellegrini, N.; Proteggente, A.; Pannala, A.; Yang, M.; Rice-Evans, C. Antioxidant Activity Applying an Improved ABTS Radical Cation Decolorization Assay. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1999, 26, 1231–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rodriguez-Saona, L.E.; Wrolstad, R.E. Extraction, Isolation, and Purification of Anthocyanins. Curr. Protoc. Food Anal. Chem. 2001, F1.1.1–F1.1.11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bochi, V.C.; Barcia, M.T.; Rodrigues, D.; Speroni, C.S.; Giusti, M.M.; Godoy, H.T. Polyphenol Extraction Optimisation from Ceylon Gooseberry (Dovyalis hebecarpa) Pulp. Food Chem. 2014, 164, 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Quatrin, A.; Pauletto, R.; Maurer, L.; Minuzzi, N.; Nichelle, S.; Carvalho, J.; Maróstica Junior, M.; Rodrigues, E.; Bochi, V.; Emanuelli, T. Characterization and Quantification of Tannins, Flavonols, Anthocyanins and Matrix-Bound Polyphenols from Jaboticaba Fruit Peel: A Comparison between Myrciaria trunciflora and M. jaboticaba. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2019, 78, 59–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 28 00056 g001 550
Figure 1. Composition of total phenolics (mg GAE L−1) of meads aged with oak (Quercus) chips. Data are presented as means ± SEM (n = 5). Lowercase letters indicate significant differences over time within the same experimental group (p ≤ 0.05). Capital letters indicate significant differences between experimental groups within the same time (p ≤ 0.05). GAE: gallic acid equivalent; BM: base mead; MOWT: mead aged with oak chips without toasting; MOMT: mead aged with oak chips at medium toasting; MOHT: mead aged with oak chips at high toasting.
Figure 1. Composition of total phenolics (mg GAE L−1) of meads aged with oak (Quercus) chips. Data are presented as means ± SEM (n = 5). Lowercase letters indicate significant differences over time within the same experimental group (p ≤ 0.05). Capital letters indicate significant differences between experimental groups within the same time (p ≤ 0.05). GAE: gallic acid equivalent; BM: base mead; MOWT: mead aged with oak chips without toasting; MOMT: mead aged with oak chips at medium toasting; MOHT: mead aged with oak chips at high toasting.
Molecules 28 00056 g001
Molecules 28 00056 g002 550
Figure 2. Composition of total flavonoids (mg CAE L−1) of meads aged with oak (Quercus) chips. Data are presented as means ± SEM (n = 5). Lowercase letters indicate significant differences over time within the same experimental group (p ≤ 0.05). Capital letters indicate significant differences between experimental groups within the same time (p ≤ 0.05). CAE: catechin equivalent; BM: base mead; MOWT: mead aged with oak chips without toasting; MOMT: mead aged with oak chips at medium toasting; MOHT: mead aged with oak chips at high toasting.
Figure 2. Composition of total flavonoids (mg CAE L−1) of meads aged with oak (Quercus) chips. Data are presented as means ± SEM (n = 5). Lowercase letters indicate significant differences over time within the same experimental group (p ≤ 0.05). Capital letters indicate significant differences between experimental groups within the same time (p ≤ 0.05). CAE: catechin equivalent; BM: base mead; MOWT: mead aged with oak chips without toasting; MOMT: mead aged with oak chips at medium toasting; MOHT: mead aged with oak chips at high toasting.
Molecules 28 00056 g002
Molecules 28 00056 g003 550
Figure 3. Antioxidant capacity (mM TEAC L−1) of meads aged with oak (Quercus) chips. Data are presented as means ± SEM (n = 5). Lowercase letters indicate significant differences over time within the same experimental group (p ≤ 0.05). Capital letters indicate significant differences between experimental groups within the same time (p ≤ 0.05). TEAC: Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity; BM: base mead; MOWT: mead aged with oak chips without toasting; MOMT: mead aged with oak chips at medium toasting; MOHT: mead aged with oak chips at high toasting.
Figure 3. Antioxidant capacity (mM TEAC L−1) of meads aged with oak (Quercus) chips. Data are presented as means ± SEM (n = 5). Lowercase letters indicate significant differences over time within the same experimental group (p ≤ 0.05). Capital letters indicate significant differences between experimental groups within the same time (p ≤ 0.05). TEAC: Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity; BM: base mead; MOWT: mead aged with oak chips without toasting; MOMT: mead aged with oak chips at medium toasting; MOHT: mead aged with oak chips at high toasting.
Molecules 28 00056 g003
Table
Table 1. Phytochemical compounds detected in mead produced with multifloral honey aged with oak (Quercus) chips.
Table 1. Phytochemical compounds detected in mead produced with multifloral honey aged with oak (Quercus) chips.
Tentative IndentificationRT (min)Molecular FormulaMolecular WeightTheoretical (m/z)Observed (m/z)Fragmentation Ion (m/z)BMMOWTMOMTMOHTReference
Citric acid2.1C6H8O7192.0270191.0197191.0368111.0205XXXX[12]
3-Hydroxy-3-(3-hydroxyphenyl) propionic acid9.0C9H10O4182.0579181.0506181.0533121.0420/122.0480XX [23]
2,3-Dihydroxy-1-guaiacylpropanone9.2C10H12O5212.0685211.0612211.0789134.0499/150.0450X [23]
Chlorogenic acid9.2C16H18O9354.0951353.0878353.0899191.0574 X X[22]
Protocatechuic acid9.3C7H6O4154.0266153.0193153.0335109.0376XXXX[12]
Butanedioic acid10.6C8H14O5190.0841189.0768189.0791129.0680/127.0878/99.0934 XX [24]
Vanillin10.7C8H8O3152.0475151.0403151.0414108.0181 XXX[12]
Sinapyl alcohol10.7C11H14O4210.0892209.0819209.0996137.0266XXXX[25]
Syringic acid10.8C9H10O5198.0528197.0455197.0477111.0182/125.0360/140.0247XXXX[22]
Ethylvanillin11.0C9H10O3166.0630165.0557165.0583119.0514/117.0355XXXX[12]
p-Coumaric11.1C9H8O3164.0473163.0401163.0401119.0518 XXX[10]
1-(2-hydroxy-4,6-dimethoxyphenyl)-ethanone11.4C10H12O4196.0736195.0663195.0690117.0337/134.0387XXXX[26]
Ellagic acid11.6C14H6O8302.0063300.9990301.0017229.0170/301.0018 XXX[27]
Abscísic acid17.1C15H20O4264.1362263.1289263.1313136.0543/203.1091 XXX[22]
Sebacic acid17.5C10H18O4202.1205201.1132201.1302183.1170/139.1259XXXX[28]
Quercetin17.7C15H12O5302.0427301.0354301.0584151.0175/107.0253/116.0828/121.0426XXXX[22]
Naringenin18.5C15H10O7272.0685271.0612271.0632125.0266/197.0639/225.0540/253.0480 XXX[10]
Tiliroside20.7C30H26O13594.1373593.1301593.1326121.0298/209.0480/417.0965 X X[29]
BM: base mead (only honey); MOWT: mead aged with oak chips without toast; MOMT: mead aged in oak chips in medium toast; MOHT: mead aged in oak chips in high toast.
Table
Table 2. Coding and characterization of treatments used in this study.
Table 2. Coding and characterization of treatments used in this study.
CodeTreatment
BMBase mead—not aged with oak chips
MOWTMead aged with oak chips without toasting
MOMTMead aged with oak chips at medium toasting (170 °C for 35 min)
MOHTMead aged with oak chips at high toasting (200 °C for 45 min)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fortes, J.P.; Franco, F.W.; Baranzelli, J.; Ugalde, G.A.; Ballus, C.A.; Rodrigues, E.; Mazutti, M.A.; Somacal, S.; Sautter, C.K. Enhancement of the Functional Properties of Mead Aged with Oak (Quercus) Chips at Different Toasting Levels. Molecules 2023, 28, 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28010056

AMA Style

Fortes JP, Franco FW, Baranzelli J, Ugalde GA, Ballus CA, Rodrigues E, Mazutti MA, Somacal S, Sautter CK. Enhancement of the Functional Properties of Mead Aged with Oak (Quercus) Chips at Different Toasting Levels. Molecules. 2023; 28(1):56. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28010056

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fortes, Juciane Prois, Fernanda Wouters Franco, Julia Baranzelli, Gustavo Andrade Ugalde, Cristiano Augusto Ballus, Eliseu Rodrigues, Márcio Antônio Mazutti, Sabrina Somacal, and Claudia Kaehler Sautter. 2023. "Enhancement of the Functional Properties of Mead Aged with Oak (Quercus) Chips at Different Toasting Levels" Molecules 28, no. 1: 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28010056

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop