Next Article in Journal
Biocompatibility Study of Electrospun Nanocomposite Membranes Based on Chitosan/Polyvinyl Alcohol/Oxidized Carbon Nano-Onions
Next Article in Special Issue
The Influence of Hydroponic Potato Plant Cultivation on Selected Properties of Starch Isolated from Its Tubers
Previous Article in Journal
Pollutant Degrading Enzyme: Catalytic Mechanisms and Their Expanded Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Structural and Biological Properties of Water Soluble Polysaccharides from Lotus Leaves: Effects of Drying Techniques
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Oat β-Glucan on the Rheological Characteristics and Microstructure of Set-Type Yogurt

1
School of Food Science, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang 453003, China
2
Department of Milk and Meat Technology, Sumy National Agrarian University, 40021 Sumy, Ukraine
3
Henan Engineering Research Center of Fruit and Vegetable Processing and Quality Safety Control, Xinxiang 453003, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(16), 4752; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26164752
Submission received: 24 June 2021 / Revised: 23 July 2021 / Accepted: 2 August 2021 / Published: 6 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Food Polysaccharides: Structure, Properties and Application)

Abstract

:
The oat β-glucan (OG) was added into set-type yogurt as a functional ingredient, in order to evaluate effects on the rheological characteristics and microstructure of set-type yogurt. When the OG concentration increased from 0 to 0.3%, the WHC gradually increased. At 0.3% OG, the set-type yogurt had the highest WHC of 94.67%. Additionally, the WHC continuously decreased, reaching the lowest WHC (about 80%) at 0.5% OG. When 0.3% OG was added, the highest score of sensory evaluation was about 85. The rheological result showed that the fermentation process went through the changes as follows: solid → liquid → solid → liquid. The addition of 0.3% OG decreased the fermentation time of set-type yogurt by about 16 min, making yogurt more inclined to be liquid. The acidity of set-type yogurt with OG was slightly higher. The result of microstructure showed that the addition of OG destroyed the three-dimensional network structure of yogurt, and some spherical aggregate particles could be clearly observed at 0.3% OG. Overall, this study provided a theoretical basis for the application of OG in set-type yogurt.

1. Introduction

Because of the high nutritional value and health function, set-type yogurt has received increasing attention from consumers. The viscosity and the microstructure are important indexes to evaluate the quality of this type of product. The addition of thickener can improve the quality of yogurt. Previous research showed that cereal β-glucan can improve the structural characteristics of yogurt under the suitable concentration range, such as affecting the network structure of the protein, reducing the separation of whey, improving the water-holding ability and viscosity [1]. Oat β-glucan (OG) is a functional component that can reduce blood lipid, blood sugar, and enhance immunity [2,3]. Moreover, OG has better emulsifying stability and higher viscosity [4] and can be used as a food colloid and thickener in the food system. Brennan et al. added OG to low-fat yogurt, which significantly improved the viscosity of the product [5].
In addition, cereal β-glucan has been shown to have the property of prebiotic. In the gastrointestinal tract, cereal β-glucan acts as a prebiotic for microbial fermentation, selectively stimulating the growth and activity of some beneficial bacteria [6,7,8]. Shen et al. compared this with the prebiotic role of OG and barley β-glucan, who found that the mice intestines with OG were higher than that of barley β-glucan in the number of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, which better promoted intestinal health [9]. Gee et al. studied the effects of barley β-glucan on the growth of two yogurt starter cultures composed of Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus denderi, subspecies Bulgarian, respectively, and who found that the barley β-glucan had no adverse effect on probiotic growth [10]. Ibrahim et al. studied the effects of OG and/or bifidobacterium producing exopolysaccharide on the physical properties, fermentation time, and sensory evaluation of low-fat yogurt, and the result showed that the OG and bifidobacterium produced exopolysaccharide in low-fat yogurt, improved the physical and sensory properties of yogurt, and enhanced probiotics activity [11]. Valentini et al. found that the cactus pear (L.) Miller), as an alternative substitute feeding, increased the antioxidant capacity of donkey milk [12].
In short, OG has good solubility, high viscosity, thickening, and other processing characteristics, which improve the texture and structure of yogurt, and it also has prebiotic properties. Therefore, OG has a good application prospect in the production of functional yogurt. However, it is necessary to study the effects of OG on the rheological properties, microstructure, and sensory evaluation of set-type yogurt.
Compared with traditional rheology, micro-rheology can analyze the microstructure of soft matter in the static state, and also be used to study the food gel process, without applying an external force to destroy the gel structure, nor affecting the original state of the sample [13,14]. In this work, the quality characteristics of set-type yogurt were evaluated by water-holding capacity (WHC), sensory evaluation, and rheological characteristics, and the suitable concentration of OG was selected. Meanwhile, the acidity of set-type yogurt samples was measured, and the microstructure was observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM). This study will provide a theoretical basis for the application of OG in set-type yogurt.

2. Results

2.1. WHC

As can be seen from Figure 1, when the OG concentration increased from 0 to 0.3%, the WHC gradually increased. At 0.3% OG, the set-type yogurt had the highest WHC of 94.67%. Additionally, the WHC continuously decreased, reaching the lowest WHC (about 80%) at 0.5% OG.

2.2. Sensory Evaluation

The sensory evaluation result of set-type yogurt is shown in Table 1. When the OG concentration increased from 0 to 0.3%, the sensory scores gradually increased. At 0.3% OG concentration, the set-type yogurt had the highest sensory score (about 85). Additionally, then, the sensory scores continuously decreased, reaching the lowest sensory scores (about 82) at 0.5% OG concentration. That was in agreement with the result of WHC.

2.3. Rheological Characteristics

In this section, diffusing wave spectroscopy (DWS) method was used to monitor the macroscopic viscosity index (MVI), elasticity index (EI), and solid–liquid balance (SLB) values of set-type yogurt with and without the OG during the fermentation and post-ripening (Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4).
The results showed that the viscosity change of yogurt with OG was similar to that of yogurt without OG. After the stable system was formed, the viscosity of yogurt with OG was higher than that of yogurt without OG. According to the changes of EI values and SLB values, the addition of 0.3% OG increased the liquid behavior of yogurt and shortened the gel point.
According to WHC, sensory evaluation, and rheological characteristics results, the optimal addition amount of OG is 0.3%.

2.4. Acidity and pH

As can be seen from Figure 5, the acidity of the set-type yogurt samples increased with the fermentation time. When the OG concentration increased from 0 to 0.4%, the acidity of set-type yogurt gradually increased. At OG concentrations of 0.3% and 0.4%, the set-type yogurt had the highest acidity (about 84). However, at 0.5% OG concentration, the acidity decreased to 82, equal to that at OG concentration of 0.2%. An opposite trend was observed for pH values and reached the minimum (about 4.18) at 0.3% and 0.4% OG. All pH values ranged from 4.18 to 4.28, which are within the normal ranges for set-type yogurts.

2.5. SEM

As shown in Figure 6a, a clear three-dimensional network is observed for set-type yogurt without OG. When the OG was added, the structures of yogurt changed significantly, depending on the OG concentration. In the set-type yogurt with 0.1% OG, the three-dimensional network of casein was partly destroyed (Figure 6b), while in the set-type yogurt with 0.3% OG, most of the three-dimensional network of casein was destroyed, and some spherical aggregate particles could be clearly observed (Figure 6c).

3. Discussion

3.1. WHC Analysis

WHC can affect the taste and tissue of set-type yogurt. The better the WHC of yogurt is, the more bound water there is in its gel structure, and the better the taste is [15,16]. The results showed that adding a proper amount of OG could enhance the water stability of set-type yogurt. The reason may be that the OG has a strong water-holding ability, and the interaction between OG and casein can effectively intercept water, prevent the precipitation of whey, and enhance the gel structure of the set-type yogurt system [17]. However, excessive OG might hinder the interactions of OG with casein, destroyed the formation of casein–OG mesh structure, and reduced the WHC of yogurt.

3.2. Sensory Evaluation Analysis

The results of Table 1 indicated that the color and flavor of OG yogurt were significantly different from those without OG (p < 0.05), but the texture of yogurt was not significantly different (p > 0.05) when the amount of OG was less than or equal to 0.4%. The comprehensive score showed that the sensory evaluation of yogurt was acceptable.

3.3. Rheological Characteristics

The preparation process of set-type yogurt included fermentation and post-ripening. During the fermentation stage, the gel structure began to form. In the post-ripening stage, the gel structure was further changed, forming a “mature” yogurt system. Hemar et al. had successfully monitored the processing of fermented milk using the DWS method [18,19].
MVI can directly reflect the viscosity characteristics of the system. It can be seen from Figure 2 that, as a function of fermentation time, the fermentation process of the set-type yogurt is a multistage process. Before fermentation, MVI for the set-type yogurt without OG was 0.4 × 10−5 at 117.6 min (point A), which was called the initial stagnation stage with low viscosity. Additionally, the fermentation of the set-type yogurt started and the fermentation process entered the rapid viscosity change stage. The viscosity was increased rapidly. At 128.3 min (point B), MVI was 0.01, 2500 times, compared to that of the MVI before fermentation. This is because fermentation led to a gradual decrease in the pH and an increase in the acidity. At the same time, casein particles aggregated to form a gel network structure, which led to an increase in the viscosity of yogurt [20]. At 215.4 min (point C), the set-type yogurt enters the high viscosity stage. The fermentation process ended and a stable gel system was formed. At this stage, MVI increased to the maximum (point C; 0.13), which was 3250 times and 1.3 times, compared to that of the initial stagnation stage and the high viscosity stage, separately.
For the set-type yogurt with OG, although the viscosity change was similar to that of the set-type yogurt without OG, the fermentation time was changed significantly. As shown in Figure 2, when the OG concentration increased from 0 to 0.3%, the fermentation time gradually shortened. At 0.3% OG concentration, the fermentation start time and end time were shortened by 15.1 min (point D; 102.5 min) and 12 min (point F; 203.4 min), respectively. In addition, at point F, the MVI is 0.025 higher than that of point C, indicating that the OG increased the viscosity of the set-type yogurt.
As a function of time, EI can directly reflect the elastic characteristics of the set-type yogurt. As can be seen from Figure 3, when the set-type yogurt was in the initial stagnation stage, the EI value remained unchanged. As the fermentation process entered the rapid viscosity change stage, the EI value was increased. When the fermentation time was 145 min (G point), the yogurt system without adding OG had the maximum EI value of 0.0085. When the fermentation time was 129 min (H point), and 0.3% OG was added, the EI value reached the maximum value (0.0117). It is generally believed that the gelation rate of yogurt is mainly affected by the temperature and the lactic acid bacteria type. However, the gel point of the set-type yogurt with 0.3% OG was shortened by 16 min, compared with that of without OG. Thus, as a functional food ingredient, OG enhanced the nutritional and functional properties of set-type yogurt and shortened the fermentation time, thus increasing the production efficiency.
The value of SLB directly reflects the solid or liquid properties of the product [21]. SLB value is between 0 and 0.5, indicating that the system tends to be solid. A range of 0.5 to 1.0 indicates that the system tends to be liquid. As can be seen from Figure 4, as a function of fermentation time, the SLB value of the sample without OG was increased rapidly from 0.4 to 0.86 (118 min) and then decreased rapidly to 0.34 (124 min). At 180 min, the SLB value stabilized around 0.60, indicating that the set-type yogurt was stable. According to the change of SLB value, the yogurt fermentation process went through the change process of solid → liquid → solid → liquid. After the fermentation, the system was more inclined to be liquid. Interestingly, the SLB value of the sample with 0.3% OG yogurt was 0.63, which was 0.03 higher than that of yogurt without OG, indicating that 0.3% OG addition increased the liquid behavior of the set-type yogurt.

3.4. Acidity and pH Analysis

The acidity of set-type yogurt with OG was slightly higher than that of without OG, and the pH was slightly lower. This was because OG, as a prebiotic, can help the Lactobacillus to produce acid during the fermentation process [11,21].

3.5. SEM Analysis

In general, the three-dimensional network structure of yogurt is considered to be formed by the aggregation of casein. As shown in Figure 6a, the casein aggregates were clearly seen in the set-type yogurt without OG. No lactic acid bacteria were observed (Figure 6a). The reason is possible that the lactic acid bacteria were damaged during vacuum freeze-drying, which was used in the sample pretreatment process. However, there were some high-brightness aggregates that adhered to the casein network. We hypothesized that these aggregates were the whey and exopolysaccharides [22].
The addition of 0.1% OG partly destroyed the three-dimensional network of casein in the set-type yogurt, suggesting that OG can affect the structure of yogurt by its interaction with casein. When the OG concentration was 0.3%, the interaction of OG and casein in the set-type yogurt was more obvious, which is supported by the observation of the spherical structures. These structures were similar to the microstructures of the complex formed by OG and lactoferrin, previously reported by Yang et al. [20].
We hypothesize that due to the addition of OG, the interaction between casein particles was disturbed, and therefore, the three-dimensional aggregates cannot form during fermentation. We hypothesize that they are the aggregates formed by casein particles aggregating on the OG molecular chain during the fermentation process of yogurt. OG is an unbranched flexible polysaccharide polymer, consisting of linear chains of β-d-glucopyranosyl units [21]. Some researchers reported that interactions exist between OG and proteins, such as lactoferrin, soy protein isolate, gliadin, and whey protein [20,23,24]. Therefore, there are some protein-binding sites on its sugar chain. When OG is added to yogurt, casein can attach to the corresponding sites of the OG chain and form protein clusters. As yogurt ferments, these casein proteins are able to aggregate further, forming spherical structures.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Materials and Starters

Pure milk was purchased from Yili Industrial Group Co. Ltd. (Baotou city, Neimenggu, China). Oat β-glucan (95% purity) was purchased from Zhongkang Food Co., (Guangzhou, China). Starters: Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus bulgaricus (Lactobacillus dechellii Bulgarian subspecies) (viable bacteria count was about 1 × 109 CFU/g) were purchased from Danisco (China) Co., Ltd., (Shanghai, China). All other chemicals were used of analytical grade.

4.2. Methods

4.2.1. Sample Preparation

The various amounts of OG (0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4% and 0.5%; w/w., %) was added to pure milk, respectively. After stirring, the milk was sterilized at 95 °C for 5 min and then cooled to 43 °C, added the starters (containing Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus denderi Bulgarian subspecies), fermented at 43 °C for 5 h, and stored at 4 °C for 24 h.

4.2.2. Determination of WHC

Weighted the 50 mL blank centrifuge tube and denoted as W0. Then, 30 g of yogurt was put into the centrifuge tube and denoted as W1. After that, the sample was centrifugated at 4000 r/min, for 25 min at 4 °C, discarded the supernatant and weighted, denoted as W2.
The calculation formula is as follows:
WHC   ( % ) = W 2   W 0 W 1 W 0 × 100

4.2.3. Sensory Evaluation

According to Table 2, 10 volunteers (5 male and 5 female), who had experience in sensory evaluation of fermented milk, were selected to conduct a sensory evaluation of set-type yogurt with different amounts of OG.

4.2.4. Effect of OG on the Rheological Characteristics of Set-Type Yogurt

According to the methods of Titapiccolo et al. [25] and He et al. [22], the rheological characteristics of set-type yogurt were measured by optical microrheometer (RHEOLASER, Formulaction company, Toulouse, France). The changes of MVI, EI, and SLB with time during the gel process were observed at 42 °C. The micro-rheological data of the system were analyzed by RHEOLASER software’s master optical micro-rheological analyzer.

4.2.5. Determination of Acidity and pH

Determination of acidity by an acidimeter (PB-10, Seidolis instruments, Gottingen, Germany) was as follows: set-type yogurt samples were taken every 1 h during the fermentation process, and yogurt samples were determined after being stored 24 h. Then, 10 g yogurt samples were put into a 250 mL triangle bottle, and 20 mL distilled water was added to dilute and mixed, 0.5% phenolphthalein was added as an indicator and titrated with 0.1 mol/L NaOH standard solution until it was slightly red. Not fading within 30 s marked the end of experiment. Consuming 0.1 M of NaOH is equal to 1 °T.
All pH values were monitored after adding starter bacterial cultures, using a digital pH meter (Thermol Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA).

4.2.6. Determined the Microstructure

According to the method of Cui bo et al. [26], OG samples stored for 24 h after post-ripening were evenly and thinly coated on the inner wall of the Petri dish. After being frozen in liquid nitrogen, the samples were quickly put into a vacuum freeze dryer for drying treatment, and then the samples were prepared by scanning electron microscope (OXFORD INCA250, Shanghai Oxford Instrument Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). Finally, the images were observed and collected under 10 kV voltage and 500~1000 times magnification.

4.2.7. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were conducted in triplicate, and the results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for all statistical evaluations, and OriginPro 8.6.0 (Originlab, Northampton, MA, USA) was used for the construction of the graphs. The sensory evaluation and yogurt WHC with different amounts of OG were analyzed by independent sample t-test of SPSS 17.0 software. One-way ANOVA was used to analyze the titration acidity of yogurt for different fermentation times, and LSD and Dunnett’s T3 test were applied for multiple comparisons; differences were considered to be statistically significant at p < 0.05.

5. Conclusions

The OG was successfully added into set-type yogurt as a functional ingredient. The fermentation time, WHC, sensory evaluation, and viscoelasticity of the set-type yogurt changed with increasing OG concentration. At 0.3% OG, the set-type yogurt had the highest WHC of 94.67%, the highest score of sensory evaluation, and the shortest fermentation time. The fermentation process of the set-type yogurt went through the changes as follows: solid → liquid → solid → liquid, and the addition of OG made yogurt more inclined to be liquid. The acidity of set-type yogurt with OG was slightly higher. The addition of OG destroyed the three-dimensional network structure of yogurt. In summary, the study provided a detailed characterization of the set-type yogurt with OG.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.L. and Y.N. (Yuliya Nazarenko); Methodology, W.Y.; Software, Y.N. (Yuanyang Nie); Validation, X.Q., W.Y. and Y.N. (Yuanyang Nie); Formal Analysis, X.Q.; Investigation, Y.Z.; Resources, X.Q.; Data Curation, B.L. and Y.N. (Yuliya Nazarenko); Writing—Original Draft Preparation, X.Q.; Writing—Review & Editing, B.L. and W.Y.; Visualization, W.Y.; Supervision, B.L. and Y.N. (Yuanyang Nie); Project Administration, B.L. and W.Y.; Funding Acquisition, B.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The APC was funded by the “2021 Zhongyuan Leading Talents Project of science and technology innovation”.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Lazaridou, A.; Vaikousi, H.; Biliaderis, C.G. Impact of mixed-linkage (1→ 3, 1→ 4) β-glucans on physical properties of acid-set skim milk gels. Int. Dairy J. 2008, 18, 312–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Samuel, P.P.; Ribayamercado, J.D.; Witchger, M.S.; Blumberg, E.J.; Geohas, J.; Galant, R.; Maki, K.C.; Tesser, J.R. Effects of consuming foods containing oat beta-glucan on blood pressure, carbohydrate metabolism and biomarkers of oxidative stress in men and women with elevated blood pressure. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007, 61, 786. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lazaridou, A.; Biliaderis, C.G. Molecular aspects of cereal β-glucan functionality: Physical properties, technological applications and physiological effects. J. Cereal Sci. 2007, 46, 101–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shah, A.; Gani, A.; Masoodi, F.A.; Wani, S.M.; Ashwar, B.A. Structural, rheological and nutraceutical potential of β-glucan from barley and oat. Bioact. Carbohydr. Diet. Fibre 2017, 10, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Brennan, C.S.; Tudorica, C.M. Carbohydrate-based fat replacers in the modification of the rheological, textural and sensory quality of yoghurt: Comparative study of the utilisation of barley beta-glucan, guar gum and inulin. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 43, 824–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gibson, G.R. Fibre and effects on probiotics (the prebiotic concept). Clin. Nutr. Suppl. 2004, 1, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lam, K.L.; Cheung, C.K. Non-digestible long chain beta-glucans as novel prebiotics. Bioact. Carbohydr. Diet. Fibre 2013, 2, 45–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bigliardi, B.; Galati, F. Innovation trends in the food industry: The case of functional foods. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 31, 118–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shen, R.L.; Dang, X.Y.; Dong, J.L.; Hu, X.Z. Effects of oat β-glucan and barley β-glucan on fecal characteristics, intestinal microflora, and intestinal bacterial metabolites in rats. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 11301–11308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Gee, V.L.; Vasanthan, T.; Temelli, F. Viscosity of model yogurt systems enriched with barley β-glucan as influenced by starter cultures. Int. Dairy J. 2007, 17, 1083–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ibrahim, M.; Barakova, N.; Jõudu, I. Enrichment of the low-fat yoghurt with oat β-glucan and EPS-producing Bifidobacterium bifidum improves its quality. Agron. Res. 2009, 18, 1689–1699. [Google Scholar]
  12. Valentini, V.; Allegra, A.; Adduci, F.; Labella, C.; Paolino, R.; Cosentino, C. Effect of cactus pear (Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Miller) on the antioxidant capacity of donkey milk. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 2018, 71, 579–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yang, N.; Lv, R.; Jia, J.; Nishinari, K.; Fang, Y. Application of microrheology in food science. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 8, 493–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhu, Q.; Qiu, S.; Zhang, H.; Cheng, Y.; Yin, L. Physical stability, microstructure and micro-rheological properties of water-in-oil-in-water (w/o/w) emulsions stabilized by porcine gelatin. Food Chem. 2018, 253, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nikoofar, E.; Hojjatoleslamy, M.; Shakerian, A.; Molavi, H.; Shariaty, M.A. Surveying the Effect of Oat Beta Glucan As a Fat Replacer on Rheological and Physicochemical Characteristics of Non Fat Set Yoghurt. Intl. J. Farm. Alli. Sci. 2013, 2, 790–796. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hassan, A.N.; Ipsen, R.; Janzen, T.; Qvist, K.B. Microstructure and rheology of yogurt made with cultures differing only in their ability to produce exopolysaccharides. J. Dairy Sci. 2003, 86, 1632–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kermiche, F.; Boulekbache –Makhlouf, L.; Félix, M.; Harkat-Madouri, L.; Remini, H.; Madani, K. Romero. Effects of the incorporation of cantaloupe pulp in yogurt: Physicochemical, phytochemical and rheological properties. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2018, 7, 585–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hemar, Y.; Singh, H.; Horne, D.S. Determination of early stages of rennet-induced aggregation of casein micelles by diffusing wave spectroscopy and rheological measurements. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2004, 4, 362–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rohart, A.; Michon, C.; Confiac, J.; Bosc, V. Evaluation of ready-to-use smls and dws devices to study acid-induced milk gel changes and syneresis. Dairy Sci. Technol. 2016, 96, 459–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Yang, W.; Deng, C.J.; Xu, L.S.; Jin, W.P.; Zeng, J.; Li, B.; Gao, Y.X. Protein-neutral polysaccharide nano-and micro-biopolymer complexes fabricated by lactoferrin and oat β-glucan: Structural characteristics and molecular interaction mechanisms. Food Res. Int. 2020, 132, 109111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rosburg, V.; Boylston, T.; White, P. Viability of bifidobacteria strains in yogurt with added oat beta-glucan and corn starch during cold storage. J. Food Sci. 2010, 75, C439–C444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. He, J.; Han, Y.; Liu, M.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Yang, X. Effect of 2 types of resistant starches on the quality of yogurt. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 5, 3956–3964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Shen, R.L.; Liu, X.Y.; Dong, J.L.; Si, J.L.; Li, H. The gel properties and microstructure of the mixture of oat β-glucan/soy protein isolates. Food Hydrocoll. 2015, 47, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zielke, C.; Lu, Y.; Poinsot, R.; Nilsson, L. Interaction between cereal β-glucan and proteins in solution and at interfaces. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2018, 162, 256–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Titapiccolo, G.I.; Corredig, M.; Alexander, M. Acid coagulation behavior of homogenized milk: Effect of interacting and non-interacting droplets observed by rheology and diffusing wave spectroscopy. Dairy Sci. Technol. 2011, 91, 185–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Cui, B.; Lu, Y.; Tan, C.; Wang, G.; Li, G.H. Effect of cross-linked acetylated starch content on the structure and stability of set yoghurt–science direct. Food Hydrocoll. 2014, 35, 576–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Comparison of WHC of set-type yogurt with different OG concentrations (0, 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4%, and 0.5%).
Figure 1. Comparison of WHC of set-type yogurt with different OG concentrations (0, 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4%, and 0.5%).
Molecules 26 04752 g001
Figure 2. The MVI value curve of set-type yogurt with different OG concentrations (0%, 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4%, and 0.5%) during fermentation.
Figure 2. The MVI value curve of set-type yogurt with different OG concentrations (0%, 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4%, and 0.5%) during fermentation.
Molecules 26 04752 g002
Figure 3. The EI value curve of set-type yogurt with different OG concentrations (0%, 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4%, and 0.5%) during fermentation.
Figure 3. The EI value curve of set-type yogurt with different OG concentrations (0%, 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4%, and 0.5%) during fermentation.
Molecules 26 04752 g003
Figure 4. The SLB value curve of set-type yogurt with different OG concentrations (0%, 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4%, and 0.5%) during fermentation.
Figure 4. The SLB value curve of set-type yogurt with different OG concentrations (0%, 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4%, and 0.5%) during fermentation.
Molecules 26 04752 g004
Figure 5. Changes of titrated acidity and pH during fermentation of set-type yogurt with and without OG addition.
Figure 5. Changes of titrated acidity and pH during fermentation of set-type yogurt with and without OG addition.
Molecules 26 04752 g005
Figure 6. SEM of set-type yogurt before and after adding OG: (a) SEM of set-type yogurt without OG addition; (b) SEM of set-type yogurt with 0.1% OG; (c) SEM of set-type yogurt with 0.3% OG.
Figure 6. SEM of set-type yogurt before and after adding OG: (a) SEM of set-type yogurt without OG addition; (b) SEM of set-type yogurt with 0.1% OG; (c) SEM of set-type yogurt with 0.3% OG.
Molecules 26 04752 g006
Table 1. Sensory evaluation of set-type yogurt.
Table 1. Sensory evaluation of set-type yogurt.
OG Addition
(%)
Characteristic Index
ColorStructural StateTextureFlavorScore
08.12 ± 0.2426.05 ± 0.4724.28 ± 0.3923.7 ± 0.9082.15 ± 0.81
0.18.6 ± 0.37 **25.6 ± 0.8324.35 ± 0.4524.7 ± 0.64 *83.25 ± 0.90 *
0.28.65 ± 0.45 **25.4 ± 0.92 *24.6 ± 0.6624.6 ± 0.49 *83.25 ± 0.81 *
0.38.71 ± 0.46 *26.78 ± 0.63 *24.97 ± 0.7924.67 ± 0.47 **85.12 ± 0.89 **
0.48.33 ± 0.37 *25.56 ± 0.49 *24.67 ± 0.8024.67 ± 0.46 **83.22 ± 0.84 *
0.58.15 ± 0.3225.2 ± 0.9824.8 ± 0.60 *24.5 ± 0.67 *82.65 ± 0.95
All data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). * and ** indicate significance at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively.
Table 2. Sensory score criteria of set-type yogurt.
Table 2. Sensory score criteria of set-type yogurt.
ItemScoring CriteriaScore
ColorUniform color, milky white or milky yellow (7–10)10
Different colors (4–6)
Structural stateGood coagulation, fine and uniform structure, no whey precipitation (25–30)30
Good coagulation, fine and uniform structure, a small amount of whey precipitation (15–24)
Poor coagulation, different structure, and serious whey precipitation (0–14)
TextureThe taste is smooth and delicate, with thickness and viscosity (25–30)30
The taste is smooth and delicate, with thickness and viscosity (15–24)
The taste is not smooth, delicate, and astringent (0–14)
FlavorThe unique fermented and milk flavor of yogurt, with a strong flavor (25–30%)30
The fermented and milk flavor of yogurt is light, and the flavor is general (15–24)
Loss of flavor of fermented milk and abnormal odor (0–14)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qu, X.; Nazarenko, Y.; Yang, W.; Nie, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, B. Effect of Oat β-Glucan on the Rheological Characteristics and Microstructure of Set-Type Yogurt. Molecules 2021, 26, 4752. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26164752

AMA Style

Qu X, Nazarenko Y, Yang W, Nie Y, Zhang Y, Li B. Effect of Oat β-Glucan on the Rheological Characteristics and Microstructure of Set-Type Yogurt. Molecules. 2021; 26(16):4752. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26164752

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qu, Xiaoqing, Yuliya Nazarenko, Wei Yang, Yuanyang Nie, Yongsheng Zhang, and Bo Li. 2021. "Effect of Oat β-Glucan on the Rheological Characteristics and Microstructure of Set-Type Yogurt" Molecules 26, no. 16: 4752. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26164752

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop