Next Article in Journal
Anti-Neuraminidase Bioactives from Manggis Hutan (Garcinia celebica L.) Leaves: Partial Purification and Molecular Characterization
Next Article in Special Issue
Untargeted HILIC-MS-Based Metabolomics Approach to Evaluate Coffee Roasting Process: Contributing to an Integrated Metabolomics Multiplatform
Previous Article in Journal
Lipid Droplet Composition Varies Based on Medaka Fish Eggs Development as Revealed by NIR-, MIR-, and Raman Imaging
Previous Article in Special Issue
Volatile Compounds in Fruit Peels as Novel Biomarkers for the Identification of Four Citrus Species
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization of the Volatiles and Quality of Hybrid Grouper and Their Relationship to Changes of Microbial Community During Storage at 4 °C

1
College of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
2
Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Aquatic Product Processing and Preservation, Shanghai 201306, China
3
National Experimental Teaching Demonstration Center for Food Science and Engineering (Shanghai Ocean University), Shanghai 201306, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(4), 818; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25040818
Submission received: 17 January 2020 / Revised: 10 February 2020 / Accepted: 10 February 2020 / Published: 13 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Exploring the OMICS Platforms in Food Analysis)

Abstract

:
To investigate the effects of spoilage bacteria on aquatic product quality and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in hybrid grouper (Epinephelus fuscoguttatus ♀×Epinephelus lanceolatus ♂), the physical conditions were evaluated, the chemical changes including color, total volatile base nitrogen (TVB-N), VOCs, and free amino acids (FFAs) were determined, and biological profiles were made through microbial community (total viable counts (TVC), 16S rRNA gene amplification sequencing, and next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology on hybrid grouper, which were stored at 4 °C for 10 days. The results showed that the whiteness and TVB-N of grouper increased throughout the storage period. The contents of glycine, alanine, and total free amino acid decreased with the microbial activity towards the end of the study period. At the end of storage, the TVC reached 9.0 log10 (CFU/g). Seventy eight strains of bacteria were isolated from the hybrid grouper, most of which were shown to be Pseudomonas spp., after 16S rRNA sequencing. The results of the NGS test showed that the diversity of dominant bacteria decreased with time; Pseudomonas azotoformans was the dominant spoilage bacteria at the end of storage. The VOCs of fish and bacteria in the grouper’s spoilage process were presented in headspace solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS). Twenty eight compounds were identified in hybrid grouper, among which alcohol and aldehyde were used to characterize freshness, both of which were not only related to the overall flavor of the grouper, but were also affected by microbial activity. However, due to the complexity of microbial communities in aquatic products, the correlation between community changes and VOCs needs further research. This study provides insights into the correlation between VOCs and specific spoilage organisms (SSOs) through the analysis of the microbial community and VOCs.

1. Introduction

Aquatic products are easily perishable due to biological and chemical changes. Along with the quality deterioration caused by microbial growth, the odor and flavor of fish undergo great shifts that directly influence customers’ purchasing behavior [1]. In fish spoilage, various microorganisms produce compounds with special odors such as nitrogenous compounds, aldehydes, ketones, and esters [2,3,4]. Therefore, they are primarily used to profile the composition of microbiota, and moreover, evaluate changes in quality and their relation with the quality and composition of microbiota during fish storage.
Under particular storage conditions, the cause of off-flavors and organoleptic rejection of seafood are related to a consortium of the metabolites (chemical spoilage indices, CSIs) produced by bacteria called Specific Spoilage Organisms (SSOs) [2]. These metabolites include a range of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The headspace solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS) is a useful analytical method for testing for VOCs, which can be used to identify potential strategies for quality assessments and for estimates of remaining shelf life [5,6,7,8,9]. This technique has been used to analyze changes in volatile compounds in the headspace of yellowfin tuna [6], raw Atlantic salmon [7], mackerel [8], and gilthead sea bream fish [10]. It provides valuable information with which to assess the extent of seafood deterioration.
The potential spoilage microbiota in some seafood has not been investigated [11]. For example, hybrid grouper (Epinephelus fuscoguttatus ♀×Epinephelus lanceolatus ♂) has the advantages of fast growth, high collagen egg content, and good taste. Grouper is a high-quality commercial fish which is rich in amino acids and unsaturated fatty acids. It has become the new darling of grouper fish and has broad market prospects. Its nutrients and delicacies are very popular in many countries.
In this study, the composition and quality changes of hybrid grouper during storage at 4 °C for 10 days were selected as the research objects. VOCs were used to determine the degree of spoilage of hybrid grouper. The purpose of this study is to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the dominant spoilage bacteria in cold-stored groupers, and to provide key ideas for fresh-keeping methods.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Physico-Chemical Analysis

Visible appearance is an important factor determining the perceived freshness and market value of fish fillets [12]. Therefore, color becomes a determinant of consumer acceptance and marketability; it is always considered an important factor, reflecting product quality [13,14]. The formation of color is attributed to the oxidation of proteins and lipids, which are abundant in fish [15]. Table 1 reveals that W* increased from 41.46 ± 1.37 (day 0) to 47.45 ± 0.77 (day 10) over the period, and the value of L* increased as well. This phenomenon was consistent with the discoloration of channel catfish during storage [16]. However, there was a fluctuation on day 6, which may be have been caused by external factors such as the size of the fish, heterogeneity, and the feeding ingredients of the batches of fish [17].
The TVB-N of grouper fillets during cold storage is shown in Table 1. The initial TVB-N of fresh fish (day 0) was 9.60 mg/100 g, followed by a mild increase over 10 days. It has been reported that the production of TVB-N in fish is caused by bacterial proliferation and bacterial decomposition of trimethylamine oxide (TMAO) and amino acid side chains [18,19,20].

2.2. Free Amino Acid Analysis

FAAs are responsible for the formation of aroma, which is one of the main factors in the development of taste, such as sweetness, umami, and bitterness. FFAs are also precursors of harmful biogenic amines. For example, histidine is the precursor of histamine [21]; it is very important from the perspective of toxicity and is used as a quality indicator for various fish [22,23]. Table 2 shows the variations of FAAs in grouper during storage. The most abundant FAAs were threonine, glycine, and lysine. Interestingly, the amount of total FAAs, as well as threonine, glycine, and alanine, increased within 2 days of storage and then decreased until the end of storage, agreeing with the observations of Shi [24] on silver carp and Ruiz-Capillas [25] on hake. Scholars have speculated that the increase during early storage may be due to muscle autolysis, inducing the breakdown of dipeptides caused by proteolytic enzymes [26], whereas the later decrease may be due to the proliferation of microorganisms, with which amino acids can produce biogenic amines such as tyrosine, arginine, and lysine by decarboxylation [25].
Glutamic acid, glycine, and alanine make important contributions to the characteristic flavor and taste of fish [27]. Concentrations of glycine and alanine in grouper increased to 129.94 mg/100 g and 55.06 mg/100 g after 2 days’ storage at 4 °C, and decreased on day 10. Glutamic acid decreased from 17.95 mg/100 g on day 0 to 5.53 mg/100 g on day 2, and then fluctuated between 16.04 and 21.63 mg/100 g. The decrease of glutamic acid may be alanine derived from pyruvate by the transamination of glutamic acid [25].

2.3. Total Viable Count and Bacterial Distribution

The bacteria sampled from grouper fillets were counted and isolated on different media. First, a total number of bacteria was counted on plate count agar (PCA). When aerobic plate count (APC) reaches 7–8 log10 (CFU/g), it is considered to have reached its sell-by date [2,28]. The shelf life of grouper was 6–8 days at 4 °C, and the number of bacteria reached 8.3 log10 (CFU/g) on day 8. As shown in Figure 1, the number of psychrotrophs was 1.5 log10 (CFU/g) on day 0, which was lower than that of mesophiles (2.6 log10 (CFU/g)), but these numbers increased after 8 days to 8.4 and 8.1 log10 (CFU/g), respectively. At the beginning of storage, the catabolism of protein in fish provided rich nutrients for the growth of microorganisms, and the total number of all microorganisms increased rapidly. Afterward, the low temperature made the psychrotrophs more competitive than the mesophiles, and the growth of the latter was suppressed. The difference in bacterial counts between the two at the end of storage was reduced, indicating that the psychrotrophs became the dominant bacteria after a certain period of refrigeration. After 16S rRNA gene amplification and sequencing, about 86.67% of all strains were identified as Pseudomonas on the CFC plates. This is due to the high selectivity of the culture medium and the universal distribution of Pseudomonas on aquatic products. However, on other plates, the Pseudomonas count was still high, accounting for 16.67% on MRS, 40.00% on Iron Ager (IA), and 57.10% on violet red bile dextrose agar (VRBGA), respectively. Except for Pseudomonas, Macrococcus, Staphylococcus, and Psychrobacter were identified on MRS, and Shewanella and Kocuria were identified on VRBGA, respectively. Clearly, it could be seen that Pseudomonas was the main flora of grouper under 4 °C storage conditions. This was not surprising, because Casaburi [9] and Huang [29] concluded that despite the large number of microorganisms that make up the initial microbiota, only a few species were sufficient to cause spoilage. This result is consistent with the next-generation sequencing (NGS) result.
The other biological factor considered to accelerate spoilage is H2S-producing bacteria [2]. In this study, H2S-producing bacteria cultured from IA increased from 2.1 log10 (CFU/g) on day 0 to 6.7 log10 (CFU/g) on day 8 and remained stable. For example, Shewanella putrefaciens was isolated from IA, which is the main H2S-producing bacteria in most seafood [30,31,32].
In our work, H2S-producing bacteria and Pseudomonas were the main microorganisms that caused grouper spoilage during low temperature storage.

2.4. Diversity of Microbial Community

NGS is a useful method for researching microbial communities independent from cultured methods [33]. Sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform showed that the average length of these sequences from samples was 423 bp. The alpha diversity estimation and phylotype coverage of bacterial communities in hybrid grouper fillets indicated sufficient sampling readings (Table 3). The coverage of all samples was above 0.999, indicating that the bacteria in all grouper samples could be identified at the current level of sequencing. From the changes of Shannon and Simpson, the microbial diversity was the highest in fish when they were received, and decreased continuously until the end of the storage. At the same time, the values of ACE and Chao were the smallest on day 10, indicating that the community richness was the lowest at the end of storage.

2.5. Bacterial Community Diversity and Succession in Grouper Fillets at Family and Genus Levels

Under storage conditions, the overall microbial community diversity in hybrid grouper is affected by storage temperature [34]. On day 0, 35 genera were observed in the grouper samples, but the number decreased to 19 on day 10 (Figure 2). During storage, there were 12 and 3 newly-observed genera on days 6 and 10, respectively. This phenomenon may indicate that some of the genera were only able to grow under an oxygen-rich environment, or that some required amino acids degraded by proteins. In this study, huge changes in the microbial community were observed in the grouper fillets stored at 4 °C for 10 days. Although the original indigenous microbiota was diverse, a small proportion of taxa dominated. The dominant taxa underwent tremendous changes over time, indicating that storage conditions had an important effect on fish. The diversity of the dominant taxa decreased with increasing storage time. Similarly, the gradual decrease in the number the genera from high to extremely low indicated the succession of microbial communities.

2.6. Microbiological Analysis and Amplicon Sequencing

This study sought to describe the effect of storage time on the microbial community in groupers to explore the spoilage mechanisms of fish. It was observed that there were huge changes in the microbiota at the phylum, genus, and species levels over the 10 days.
A total of 183 different OTUs were obtained by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. At the beginning of storage, Macrococcus spp. was the main genus in the bacterial communities of grouper (Figure 3a). However, the number dropped rapidly. On the other hand, Pseudomonas spp. grew at an extremely high speed and became the dominant genus over the course of the storage (increasing from 1.91% on day 0 to 74.38% on day 6) The other two genera that underwent obvious increases were Psychrobacter and Vibrio, which increased from 0.03% and 0.77% to 8.21% and 13.85%, respectively. Compared to the initial status, the bacterial communities were less abundant. The main microbiome was Pseudomonas (97.54%) at the end of the testing period. This was consistent with the identification results obtained by 16s RNA gene amplification sequencing. It was found that 33.58% of Pseudomonas were unknown species, which was concordant with the research on meat and Arctic fishes [35]. It can be indicated that Pseudomonas has a high degree of heterogeneity and biodiversity in its species. The other 64.85% were identified to be Pseudomonas azotoformans, which can be considered as the SSO of hybrid grouper under 4 °C storage conditions. Pseudomonas was previously found to be the major-specific spoilage organism in aerobically-stored fish [7], and it has been reported as the most common spoilage bacterium to cause rapid and intense spoilage [7,36].
It was noteworthy that the proportion of Shewanella was relatively low (Figure 3b). Nevertheless, the result of our study was inconsistent with other research. The reason for this phenomenon may be the DNA extraction and PCR amplification that affected the obtained bacterial community profiles; with fewer PCR cycles, less sample information can be captured [35,37].

2.7. Heatmap Analysis

The established hierarchical clustering heatmap at the genus level was based on the top 30 most abundant genera to analyze and compare the composition and dynamic changes of microbial communities in samples at different storage times (Figure 4). The gene tree to the left of the heatmap displays the clustering of genes. The heatmap reflected the changes in some low-abundance microbiota which were not well represented in their histograms (Figure 4) [38].
According to the heatmap, the dominant bacterial community in fresh grouper was Macrococcus (87.42%), including 3.38% Staphylococcus, 2.05% Bacillus, and 2.04% Acinetobacter. However, the number of these three bacteria and some other genera decreased and even dropped to 0, suggesting that they were less competitive than Pseudomonas during cold storage. Pseudomonas has been confirmed as SSO in several refrigerated fish [39,40,41], and it grows rapidly during refrigeration and plays an important role in the microbial community [41], as supported by the results of this study.

2.8. VOCs Analysis on Grouper Fillets

The process of microbial spoilage results in the sensory deterioration of grouper fillets during storage; therefore, it is suggested that the growth of microbial is closely related to sensory evaluation at the end of shelf life. The levels of the 28 VOCs in fish stored at 4 °C are given in Table 4. It was found that volatile compounds, which were extracted and detected by HS-SPME-GC-MS, changed during storage. Most VOCs were metabolites of microbial origin, such as alcohols and aldehydes.
At the beginning of the experiment, 1-penten-3-ol, and 1-octen-3-ol increased from 2.43 (day 0) to 3.91 (day 4) and 18.00 (day 0) to 33.47 (day 4), respectively. The opposite pattern was observed with 2-ethyl-1-hexanol, which decreased from 207.39 (day 0) to 137.07 (day 4). A similar finding has been reported in other studies [10,42]. Some scholars pointed out that the effect of 15-lipoxygenase on eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and 12-lipoxygenase on arachidonic acid can explain the increase in 1-penten-3-ol and 1-octen-3-ol [43,44]. At the middle and later stages of the experiment, the production of alcohol increased significantly. After 10 days of storage, the relative level of 1-octen-3-ol increased significantly to 40.85 (day 10) (p < 0.05). This result was consistent with the findings of Josephson and Lindsay [45] on freshly-harvested fish which had low levels of 1-octen-3-ol (10–100 ppb) at the beginning of the storage. Additionally, 1-octen-3-ol has a low odor detection threshold, and its production is mainly due to the spoilage of fish: therefore, 1-octen-3-ol is a good quality indicator in fish [46].
At the early stage of storage, the relative content of most carbonyls changed significantly [8]. The VOCs of the fresh grouper were mainly comprised of aldehydes such as hexanal, heptanal, octanal, nonanal, and decanal. Among these chemicals, straight-chain aldehydes are characterized as having a green, herbal odor [47]. However, when their concentration exceeds a certain threshold, they become undesirable [48]. For example, when the concentration of hexanal exceeds a certain threshold, it is related to rancid odors in stored meat [45]. As reported by Marsili [49,50], hexanal is the predominant autoxidation byproduct of linoleic and linolenic acid. There are many ketones in fish because of the presence of bacteria [9]; however, in this study, only a small number of ketones were detected. This phenomenon occurred when the temperature exceeded 100 degrees [51]. The ketones were identified as 2-nonanone and acetylacetone over the course of the experiment.
It was reported by Casaburi [9] that Pseudomonas and Carnobacterium are the main bacteria that produce alcohols and aldehydes. The number of Pseudomonas and Carnobacterium increased with storage time in this study. However, the diversity of microorganisms during storage increased the complexity of analyzing volatile substances; further studies are needed on the effects of different microorganisms on odor changes.

2.9. VOCs Analysis of Bacteria

The undesirable odors generated during spoilage are related to bacterial metabolism [52]. A total of 154 VOCs were detected in 20 samples and were classified into 11 categories (Figure 5). The number of aromatic compounds for almost all bacteria strains was identified as 15~25 types.
In the heatmap (Figure 5), 20 groups of bacteria and 11 kinds of aromatic compounds were correlated. As shown in the figure, the group of Pseudomonas rhodesiae, Pseudomonas antarctica, Pseudomonas azotoformans, Pseudomonas koreensis, Pseudomonas moraviensis, and Pseudomonas extremaustralis were highly related to the production of pyrazines and hydrocarbons, while Macrococcus caseolyticus, Moraxella osloensis, Shewanella putrefaciens, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, Pseudomonas putida, and Pseudomonas helmanticensis were less related to these aromatic compounds. but produced higher levels of alcohol and other compounds. It was observed that a high content of alcohol was produced by Citrobacter murliniae, Staphylococcus edaphicus, Bacillus velezensis, and Psychrobacter faecalis. As for hydrocarbons, they were concentrated in the genus of Pseudomonas, especially on Pse. rhodesiae. With respect to ethers, they were the most abundant category, and were not detected in other bacteria apart from the group of Pse. Songnenensis, Pseudomonas psychrophila, Pseudomonas parafulva, and Klebsiella oxytocahigh. In particular, Pseudomonas was considered to be a great contributor to ester production and to play an important role in sensory evaluation [53,54].
Microorganisms utilize different precursor compounds to produce their volatile metabolites that significantly alter the composition of their VOCs [55]. Many researchers [37,54,56] have stated that the existence of 2-ethyl-1-hexanol was associated with Pseudomonas activity. To a certain extent, Pseudomonas also participated in the production of 3-methyl-1-butanol, 2-heptanone, 2-nonanone, and 2-undecanone [5,52,57], which was basically consistent with our findings.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Grouper Fillet Provision and Storage

Ten hybrid groupers (length: 54.60 ± 1.78 cm, weight: 1100 ± 55 g) were purchased from an aquatic product market of Luchaogang, Shanghai, China. The fish were then placed in polyethylene bags with oxygen and water and transported to the laboratory alive at 0.5 h. The hybrid groupers were stunned, headed, gutted, and washed using deionized water. The fish were cut into 8 slices (25 ± 5 g) using sterile cutting boards and knives. All the slices were then mixed, and a random sample of 10 slices was placed in one sterile plastic bag (240 ± 20 g). Eight bags of samples were stored at 4 ± 1 °C until required. One bag was selected for all analyses at each specific storage time. Sampling times were days 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10.

3.2. Physico-Chemical Analysis

The method described by Benjakul [58] was slightly modified. The color changes of hybrid grouper were determined by the colorimeter (Chroma Meter CR-400, Hangzhou Ke Sheng Instrument Co., Ltd. China), and the weight was calculated according to the following formula:
W * ( wight ) = 100 ( 100 L * ) 2 + b * 2 + a * 2
The TVB-N was Determined According to the Method Fan & Luo [59], and Expressed in mg/100 g of Fish. The Data were Analyzed in Triplicate Using Excel 2019.

3.3. FAAs Analysis

A 2 g sample was homogenized in 10 mL 5% trichloroacetic acid solution using an Ultra Turrax T25 (IKA, Staufenim, Germany). After that, the samples were centrifuged at 10,000 g for 10 min at 4 °C. The extraction and centrifugation were repeated twice, and the supernatant after centrifugation was diluted to 25 mL. One milliliter of the extract was filtered using a 0.22 μm membrane filter, and then the filtrate was used for FAA quantification using an automatic amino acid analyzer (Agilent 1100 Series; Palo Alto, CA, USA). The data were analyzed in triplicate.

3.4. Determination of VOCs in Grouper Fillets

The method described by Iglesias [10] has been slightly modified. At every sampling point, 5 g of sample fillets were stored at −40 °C and analyzed within 3 weeks. Each 2.5 g portion was transfered into a 15 mL glass vial with 2.5 mL of saturated NaCl solution, and stirred 5 min. To remove any volatile contaminants, the fiber was exposed to the inlet for 10 min before each analysis. The 65 μm SPME fiber (PDMS/DVB) was then exposed to the headspace under the same conditions for 20 min at 40 °C.
An Agilent 7890A gas chromatograph (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, California, USA) was used with an Agilent 5975C mass spectrometer to analyze VOCs. The constant flow rate of helium was 0.9 mL/min as a carrier gas. The temperature of the oven was held for 5 min at 40 °C, and then raised to 150 °C at a rate of 4 °C/min; subsequently, it was raised to 250 °C at a rate of 30 °C/min and maintained for 5 min. The interface temperature was set at 280 °C. VOCs were identified via the comparison of mass spectra with existing data in the NIST11 library. The content changes of each compound were calculated based on the relative peak areas (peak areas/106). The data were analyzed in triplicate.

3.5. Microbial Diversity Analysis

Microbial DNA was extracted from four groups of samples (day 0, day 6, day 10) using the E.Z.N.A. soil DNA Kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA, U.S.). The DNA quality was checked by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. The diluted-genomic DNA was used as a template, and the V3–V4 hypervariable regions of the bacteria 16S rRNA gene were amplified with primers by the thermocycler PCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). Each sample was subjected to three replicate experiments. The reference point was subjected to preliminary quantification and the PCR product was quantified by QuantiFlour TM-ST Blue Fluorescence System (Promega) and then mixed according to the sequencing amount of each sample. According to the standard procedure of Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China), the combined equimolar purified amplicons were paired-end sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq platform.

3.6. Microbiological Analysis

3.6.1. Enumeration and Purification of Bacteria

Twenty-five grams of samples from each hybrid grouper were aseptically weighed and homogenized in 225 mL sterilized 0.85% sterile NaCl solution. Ten-fold serial dilutions were performed. Five media were selected for the detachment and counting of residential bacteria. Total viable counts (TVC) and psychrotrophs were determined on PCA, respectively, incubated at 35 ± 1 °C for 48 h and incubated at 4 ± 1 °C for 10 days. H2S-producing bacteria were enumerated on IA at 20 ± 1 °C for 4 days. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) were enumerated at 30 ± 1 °C for 48 h using MRS agar. The Enterobacteriaceae were enumerated on VRBDA and incubated at 35 ± 1 °C for 48 h. Pseudomonas sp. were enumerated on Pseudomonas CFC Selective Agar at 20 ± 1 °C for 72 h. All of these media were procured from HaiBo Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (Qingdao, China). Bacterial concentration was expressed as log10 (CFU/g) [60]. Colonies were randomly selected from the incubated plates and streaked on PCA repeatedly to obtain pure colonies [61]. Then, individual strains were preserved in tryptic soy broth (TSB) with 30% glycerol at −80 °C.

3.6.2. Isolation and Identification of Spoilage Bacteria

Colonies with larger decomposition zone were selected from each selective medium and strewed twice on the medium to obtain individual colony. The universal primers 27F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1492R (5′-CGACGGCTACCTTGTTACGA-3′) were used to amplify the 16S rRNA gene sequences for identification. The PCR products were purified and sequenced by Personalbio (Shanghai Personal Gene Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China).

3.6.3. HS-SPME-GC-MS analysis

Minor modifications were made to the method described in Yuxiang, Z. [53]. Twenty-two representative bacteria were selected and incubated in TSB at 4 °C for 10 days, and then centrifuged 5 mL of the bacterial solution. To promote the precipitation of volatiles, the supernatant was placed in a 15 mL glass vial with 1.5 g NaCl.
The volatiles were extracted by equilibrating with a 50/30 μm DVB/CAR/PDMS fiber (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) at 40 °C for 15 min. VOC generation was measured using a GC–MS 7890A-5975C Ultra system (Agilent Technologies Inc., USA). High purity helium was still used as the carrier gas at a column flow of 0.9 mL/min. The temperature of the oven held for 3 min at 40 °C, and then increased to 120 °C at a rate of 4 °C/min; subsequently, it increased to 250 °C at a rate of 6 °C/min and was maintained for 10 min. The interface temperature was set at 230 °C. VOCs were identified via the comparison of mass spectra with existing data in the NIST11 library. The content changes of each compound were calculated based on the relative peak areas (peak areas/106).

3.7. Statistical Analysis

All physico-chemical determinations were done in triplicate. Differences in color, TVB-N, FAAs, and bacterial counts were statistically tested by performing Analysis of Variance. SPSS 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for a one-way analysis of variance. Frequency percentage (FP) was used to analyze the distribution of dominant bacteria in fish samples at different storage times. In GC-MS analysis, the data were first standardized, and then analyzed using the R software to generate the heatmap.

4. Conclusions

Changes in the microbial community and physico-chemical quality of hybrid grouper preserved at 4 °C for 10 days were described in this paper. The values of whiteness and TVB-N increased with storage time. Glutamate, glycine, and alanine, as the main contributors to flavor, changed significantly (p < 0.05) over time. The number of bacteria in grouper reached 6.8 log10 (CFU/g) on day 6, which indicated that the sample was spoiled. The VOCs during the storage of grouper filltes were dissected, and a large number of alcohols, aldehydes, and ketones were generated due to microbial action. Both 1-penten-3-ol and 1-octen-3-ol were identified as potential CSIs candidate for grouper. The detection of VOCs produced by microorganisms in separate cultures showed that the production of 2-ethyl-1-hexanol, 3-methyl-1-butanol, 2-heptanone, 2-nonanone, and 2-undecanone was related to the growth and reproduction of Pseudomonas ssp. to some extent. The results of the study provide valuable information for the quality control of grouper freshness.
In order to confirm and understand the mechanism of production of volatile organic compounds, further studies on VOCs produced by inoculating individual SSOs in sterile fish are needed.

Author Contributions

Experiments designing, data analyzing, figures, and tables making, manuscript preparing, W.H.; Study designing, guaranteeing of the integrity of entire study, manuscript final version approving, J.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 31972142) and the Shanghai Science and Technology Commission Public Service Platform Construction Project (NO. 17DZ2293400).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 31972142) and the Shanghai Science and Technology Commission Public Service Platform Construction Project (NO. 17DZ2293400) for providing funding support for this study. We thank Majorbio (Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China)) for microbial diversity analysis. Thank Personalbio (Shanghai Personal Gene Technology Co., Ltd.) for 16S rRNA sequencing. Thank Miao Luoqi for her syntax support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Oehlenschläger, J. Seafood quality assessment. Seaf. Process. Technol. Qual. Saf. 2014, 359–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gram, L.; Huss, H.H. Microbiological spoilage of fish and fish products. Food Microbiol. 1996, 33, 121–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Parlapani, F.F.; Mallouchos, A.; Haroutounian, S.A.; Boziaris, I.S. Microbiological spoilage and investigation of volatile profile during storage of sea bream fillets under various conditions. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2014, 189, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Olafsdóttir, G.; Martinsdóttir, E.; Oehlenschläger, J.; Dalgaard, P.; Jensen, B.; Undeland, I.; Mackie, I.M.; Henehan, G.; Nielsen, J.; Nilsen, H. Methods to evaluate fish freshness in research and industry. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 1997, 8, 258–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Parlapani, F.F.; Mallouchos, A.; Haroutounian, S.A.; Boziaris, I.S. Volatile organic compounds of microbial and non-microbial origin produced on model fish substrate un-inoculated and inoculated with gilt-head sea bream spoilage bacteria. Lwt - Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 78, 54–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Edirisinghe, R.K.B.; Graffham, A.J.; Taylor, S.J. Characterisation of the volatiles of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) during storage by solid phase microextraction and GC–MS and their relationship to fish quality parameters. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 42, 1139–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Marta, M.-K.; Yoon, Y.-J.; Ukuku, D.O.; Yuk, H.-G. Volatile chemical spoilage indexes of raw Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) stored under aerobic condition in relation to microbiological and sensory shelf lives. Food Microbiol. 2016, 53, 182–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Duflos, G.; Coin, V.M.; Cornu, M.; Antinelli, J.F.; Malle, P. Determination of volatile compounds to characterize fish spoilage using headspace/mass spectrometry and solid-phase microextraction/gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2010, 86, 600–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Casaburi, A.; Piombino, P.; Nychas, G.J.; Villani, F.; Ercolini, D. Bacterial populations and the volatilome associated to meat spoilage. Food Microbiol. 2015, 45, 83–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Iglesias, J.; Medina, I.; Bianchi, F.; Careri, M.; Mangia, A.; Musci, M. Study of the volatile compounds useful for the characterisation of fresh and frozen-thawed cultured gilthead sea bream fish by solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 2009, 115, 1473–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Odeyemi, O.A.; Burke, C.M.; Bolch, C.C.J.; Stanley, R. Seafood spoilage microbiota and associated volatile organic compounds at different storage temperatures and packaging conditions. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2018, 280, S0168160517305603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Liu, D.; Liang, L.; Xia, W.; Regenstein, J.M.; Zhou, P. Biochemical and physical changes of grass carp ( Ctenopharyngodon idella ) fillets stored at −3 and 0 °C. Food Chem. 2013, 140, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cao, J.; Wang, Q.; Ma, T.; Bao, K.; Yu, X.; Duan, Z.; Shen, X.; Li, C. Effect of EGCG-gelatin biofilm on the quality and microbial composition of tilapia fillets during chilled storage. Food Chem. 2020, 305, 125454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chéret, R.; Delbarre-Ladrat, C.; Lamballerie-Anton, M.D.; Verrez-Bagnis, V. Calpain and cathepsin activities in post mortem fish and meat muscles. Food Chem. 2007, 101, 1474–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Feng, X.; Ng, V.K.; Mikš-Krajnik, M.; Yang, H. Effects of Fish Gelatin and Tea Polyphenol Coating on the Spoilage and Degradation of Myofibril in Fish Fillet During Cold Storage. Food Bioprocess. Technol. 2017, 10, 89–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yilin, L.; Shaoyang, L.; David, C.; Shengshun, C.; Yifen, W.; Bell, L.N. Chemical treatments for reducing the yellow discoloration of channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) fillets. J. Food Sci. 2013, 78, S1609–S1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jun-Hu, C.; Da-Wen, S.; Zhong, H.; Xin-An, Z. Texture and Structure Measurements and Analyses for Evaluation of Fish and Fillet Freshness Quality: A Review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2014, 13, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Haaland, H.; Njaa, L.R. Total volatile nitrogen — A quality criterion for fish silage? Aquaculture 1989, 79, 311–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fan, W.; Chi, Y.; Zhang, S. The use of tea polyphenol dip to extend the shelf life of silver carp (Hypophthalmicthys molitrix) during storage in ice. Food Chem. 2008, 108, 148–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sun, L.; Sun, J.; Liu, D.; Fu, M.; Xi, Y.; Guo, Y. The preservative effects of chitosan film incorporated with thinned young apple polyphenols on the quality of grass carp ( Ctenopharyngodon idellus ) fillets during cold storage: Correlation between the preservative effects and the active properties of the film. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2018, 17, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zeng, X.; Xia, W.; Fang, Y.; Jiang, Q. Changes of biogenic amines in Chinese low-salt fermented fish pieces (Suan yu) inoculated with mixed starter cultures. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 48, 685–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sakaguchi, M.; Murata, M.; Kawai, A. Changes in free amino acids and creatine contents in yellowtail (Seriola quinqueradiata) muscle during ice storage. J. Food Sci. 2010, 47, 1662–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ababouch, L.; Afilal, M.E.; Benabdeljelil, H.; Busta, F.F. Quantitative changes in bacteria, amino acids and biogenic amines in sardine (Sardina pilchardus) stored at ambient temperature (25–28 °C) and in ice. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 26, 297–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shi, C.; Cui, J.; Na, Q.; Luo, Y.; Han, L.; Hang, W. Effect of ginger extract and vinegar on ATP metabolites, IMP-related enzyme activity, reducing sugars and phosphorylated sugars in silver carp during postslaughter storage. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 52, 413–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ruiz-Capillas, C.; Moral, A. Changes in free amino acids during chilled storage of hake (Merluccius merluccius L.) in controlled atmospheres and their use as a quality control index. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2001, 212, 302–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Castro-Giráldez, M.; Toldrá, F.; Fito, P. Low frequency dielectric measurements to assess post-mortem ageing of pork meat. Lwt-Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 44, 1465–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Özden, Ö. Changes in amino acid and fatty acid composition during shelf-life of marinated fish. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2010, 85, 2015–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Parlapani, F.F.; Kormas, K.A.; Boziaris, I.S. Microbiological changes, shelf life and identification of initial and spoilage microbiota of sea bream fillets stored under various conditions using 16S rRNA gene analysis. Food Agric. 2015, 95, 2386–2394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Huang, Z.; Liu, X.; Jia, S.; Luo, Y. The effect of essential oils on microbial composition and quality of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus) fillets during chilled storage. Food Control. 2017, 82, 316–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yang, S.P.; Xie, J.; Cheng, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Qian, Y.F. Response of Shewanella putrefaciens to low temperature regulated by membrane fluidity and fatty acid metabolism. Lwt-Food Sci Technol 2020, 117, 108638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yang, Z.Q.; Tao, X.Y.; Zhang, H.; Rao, S.Q.; Gao, L.; Pan, Z.M.; Jiao, X.A. Isolation and characterization of virulent phages infecting Shewanella baltica and Shewanella putrefaciens, and their application for biopreservation of chilled channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus). Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2019, 292, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. El-Barbary, I.M. First recording of Shewanella putrefaciens in cultured Oreochromis niloticus and its identification by 16Sr RNA in Egypt. Egypt. J. Aquat. Res. 2017, 43, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jia, S.; Huang, Z.; Lei, Y.; Zhang, L.; Li, Y.; Luo, Y. Application of Illumina-MiSeq high throughput sequencing and culture-dependent techniques for the identification of microbiota of silver carp ( Hypophthalmichthys molitrix ) treated by tea polyphenols. Food Microbiol. 2018, 76, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Odeyemi, O.A.; Burke, C.M.; Bolch, C.C.J.; Stanley, R. Spoilage microbial community profiling by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing of modified atmosphere packaged live mussels at cold storage temperature. Food Res. Int. 2018, 121, 568–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Jääskeläinen, E.; Jakobsen, L.M.A.; Hultman, J.; Eggers, N.; Bertram, H.C.; Björkroth, J. Metabolomics and bacterial diversity of packaged yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) and salmon (Salmo salar) show fish species-specific spoilage development during chilled storage. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2019, 293, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Emborg, J.; Laursen, B.G.; Rathjen, T.; Dalgaard, P. Microbial spoilage and formation of biogenic amines in fresh and thawed modified atmosphere-packed salmon (Salmo salar) at 2 °C. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2002, 92, 790–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Danilo, E.; Ilario, F.; Antonella, N.; Maurice, N.; Pamela, V.; Antonietta, L.S.; Luca, L.; Gianluigi, M.; M Elisabetta, G.; Francesco, V. Monitoring of microbial metabolites and bacterial diversity in beef stored under different packaging conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 7372–7381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Sun, X.; Hong, H.; Jia, S.; Liu, Y.; Luo, Y. Effects of phytic acid and lysozyme on microbial composition and quality of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus) fillets stored at 4 °C. Food Microbiol. 2020, 86, 103313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Parlapani, F.F.; Verdos, G.I.; Haroutounian, S.A.; Boziaris, I.S. The dynamics of Pseudomonas and volatilome during the spoilage of gutted sea bream stored at 2 °C. Food Control. 2015, 55, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, Q.; Zhang, L.; Luo, Y. Changes in microbial communities and quality attributes of white muscle and dark muscle from common carp ( Cyprinus carpio ) during chilled and freeze-chilled storage. Food Microbiol. 2018, 73, 237–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, H.; Luo, Y.; Huang, H.; Xu, Q. Microbial succession of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus) filets during storage at 4 °C and its contribution to biogenic amines’ formation. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2014, 190, 66–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Alasalvar, C.; Taylor, K.D.A.; Shahidi, F. Comparison of volatiles of cultured and wild sea bream (Sparus aurata) during storage in ice by dynamic headspace analysis/gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 2616–2622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Miller, A.; Scanlan, R.A.; Lee, J.S.; Libbey, L.M. Volatile Compounds Produced in Ground Muscle Tissue of Canary Rockfish. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 1973, 29, 1125–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lerke, P.A.; Huck, R.W. Objective determination of canned tuna quality: Identification of ethanol as a potentially useful index. J. Food Sci. 1977, 42, 755–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Josephson, D.B.; Lindsay, R.C. Enzymic Generation of Volatile Aroma Compounds from Fresh Fish. In Proceedings of the Acs Symposium Series-american Chemical Society, Washington, DC, USA, 25 August 1986; pp. 201–219. [Google Scholar]
  46. Curioni, P.M.G.; Bosset, J.O. Key odorants in various cheese types as determined by gas chromatography-olfactometry. Int. Dairy J. 2002, 12, 0–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Insausti, K.; Beriain, M.J.; Gorraiz, C.; Purroy, A. Volatile Compounds of Raw Beef from 5 Local Spanish Cattle Breeds Stored Under Modified Atmosphere. J. Food Sci. 2006, 67, 1580–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Calkins, C.R.; Hodgen, J.M. A fresh look at meat flavor. Meat Sci. 2007, 77, 63–8053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Marsili, R.T. Comparison of Solid-Phase Microextraction and Dynamic Headspace Methods for the Gas Chromatographic--Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Light-Induced Lipid Oxidation Products in Milk. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 1999, 37, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Marsili, R.T. SPME-MS-MVA as an electronic nose for the study of off-flavors in milk. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 648–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kawai, T.; Sakaguchi, M. Fish flavor. C R C Crit. Rev. Food Technol. 1996, 36, 257–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, G.Y.; Wang, H.H.; Han, Y.W.; Xing, T.; Ye, K.P.; Xu, X.L.; Zhou, G.H. Evaluation of the spoilage potential of bacteria isolated from chilled chicken invitro and in situ. Food Microbiol. 2017, 63, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Yuxiang, Z.; Jianping, W.; Yahong, Y.; Tianli, Y. Diversity and characterization of spoilage-associated psychrotrophs in food in cold chain. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2019, 290, 86–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ercolini, D.; Casaburi, A.; Nasi, A.; Ferrocino, I.; Monaco, R.D.; Ferranti, P.; Mauriello, G.; Villani, F. Different molecular types of Pseudomonas fragi have the same overall behaviour as meat spoilers. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010, 142, 120–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Gudrun, O.; Rosa, J.; Lauzon, H.L.; Joop, L.; Kristberg, K. Characterization of volatile compounds in chilled cod (Gadus morhua) fillets by gas chromatography and detection of quality indicators by an electronic nose. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 10140–10147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ferrocino, I.; La, S.A.; Torrieri, E.; Musso, S.S.; Mauriello, G.; Villani, F.; Ercolini, D. Antimicrobial packaging to retard the growth of spoilage bacteria and to reduce the release of volatile metabolites in meat stored under vacuum at 1 °C. J. Food Prot. 2013, 76, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Argyri, A.A.; Mallouchos, A.; Panagou, E.Z.; Nychas, G.J.E. The dynamics of the HS/SPME–GC/MS as a tool to assess the spoilage of minced beef stored under different packaging and temperature conditions. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2015, 193, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Benjakul, S.; Visessanguan, W.; Tueksuban, J. Changes in physico-chemical properties and gel-forming ability of lizardfish (Saurida tumbil) during post-mortem storage in ice. Food Chem. 2003, 80, 535–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Fan, H.; Luo, Y.; Yin, X.; Bao, Y.; Feng, L. Biogenic amine and quality changes in lightly salt- and sugar-salted black carp ( Mylopharyngodon piceus ) fillets stored at 4 °C. Food Chem. 2014, 159, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chaillou, S.; Chaulottalmon, A.; Caekebeke, H.; Cardinal, M.; Christieans, S.; Denis, C.; Desmonts, M.H.; Dousset, X.; Feurer, C.; Hamon, E. Origin and ecological selection of core and food-specific bacterial communities associated with meat and seafood spoilage. Isme J. 2015, 9, 1105–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Zhang, J.; Yue, T.; Yuan, Y. Alicyclobacillus contamination in the production line of kiwi products in China. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e67704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Sample Availability: Not available.
Figure 1. Total viable count of bacteria on five types of media. PCA = Plate Count agar; CFC = Pseudomonas CFC Selective agar; VRBGA = violet red bile dextrose agar; MRS = de Mann, Rogosa, Sharpe agar; IA = Iron agar, PCA2 = PCA incubated for psychrotrophs.
Figure 1. Total viable count of bacteria on five types of media. PCA = Plate Count agar; CFC = Pseudomonas CFC Selective agar; VRBGA = violet red bile dextrose agar; MRS = de Mann, Rogosa, Sharpe agar; IA = Iron agar, PCA2 = PCA incubated for psychrotrophs.
Molecules 25 00818 g001
Figure 2. Venn diagram showing the distribution (97% similarity) of the genera levels present in the samples of grouper stored at 4 °C for 10 days. Each number represents a shared or unique genus in the samples in each sampling day. Different color indicates different sampling days (day 0 = red, day 6 = blue and day 10 = green).
Figure 2. Venn diagram showing the distribution (97% similarity) of the genera levels present in the samples of grouper stored at 4 °C for 10 days. Each number represents a shared or unique genus in the samples in each sampling day. Different color indicates different sampling days (day 0 = red, day 6 = blue and day 10 = green).
Molecules 25 00818 g002
Figure 3. Community barplot analysis of microbiota at the genus level (a) and species level (b) from grouper fillets during storage.
Figure 3. Community barplot analysis of microbiota at the genus level (a) and species level (b) from grouper fillets during storage.
Molecules 25 00818 g003
Figure 4. Community heatmap at the genus level of microbiota from hybrid grouper during storage at 4 °C. Those with the highest abundance relationships are in red, while those with the lowest abundant relationships are blue.
Figure 4. Community heatmap at the genus level of microbiota from hybrid grouper during storage at 4 °C. Those with the highest abundance relationships are in red, while those with the lowest abundant relationships are blue.
Molecules 25 00818 g004
Figure 5. Heatmap showing the relative content of various aroma categories in isolates. Those with the highest abundant relationships are in red, while those with the lowest abundant relationships are in blue.
Figure 5. Heatmap showing the relative content of various aroma categories in isolates. Those with the highest abundant relationships are in red, while those with the lowest abundant relationships are in blue.
Molecules 25 00818 g005
Table 1. Changes in the color and TVB-N of hybrid grouper fillets during storage at 4 °C.
Table 1. Changes in the color and TVB-N of hybrid grouper fillets during storage at 4 °C.
Time (days)L *a *b *W *TVB-N (mg/100 g)
041.55 ± 1.39 c−0.46 ± 0.14bc−2.78 ± 1.50 bc41.46 ± 1.37 c9.60 ± 0.41 e
243.52 ± 0.34 bc0.53 ± 0.09a−3.63 ± 0.26 c43.40 ± 0.33 bc10.27 ± 0.27 e
444.21 ± 0.91 b−0.28 ± 0.37bc−4.01 ± 0.18 c44.06 ± 0.91 b12.53 ± 0.86 d
643.36 ± 1.20 bc−0.86 ± 0.21c−3.30 ± 1.09 bc43.25 ± 1.26 bc14.26 ± 1.08 c
846.79 ± 1.90 a0.89 ± 0.86a3.86 ± 0.55 a46.63 ± 1.94 a20.21 ± 0.99 b
1047.49 ± 0.76 a0.16 ± 0.36ab−1.87 ± 0.60 b47.45 ± 0.77 a21.36 ± 2.07 a
W * = weight of hybrid grouper. The different superscripts (a ~ e) in the column denote significant differences (p < 0.05). The same as below.
Table 2. Changes in the FAA contents (mg/100g) of hybrid grouper fillets during storage at 4 °C.
Table 2. Changes in the FAA contents (mg/100g) of hybrid grouper fillets during storage at 4 °C.
Amino AcidsDay 0Day 2Day 4Day 6Day 8Day 10
Aspartic acid1.50 ± 0.04 d1.94 ± 0.08 c1.05 ± 0.09 e3.04 ± 0.02 b1.66 ± 0.00 d3.48 ± 0.02 a
Threonine13.31 ± 1.42 d21.89 ± 0.15 a19.95 ± 0.96 ab16.99 ± 1.32 bc17.37 ± 0.72 bc14.39 ± 0.04 cd
Serine6.20 ± 0.64 b16.02 ± 0.03 a16.60 ± 0.87 a4.73 ± 3.68 b8.39 ± 0.36 b6.33 ± 0.01 b
Glutamic acid17.95 ± 1.76a bc5.53 ± 0.03 d20.30 ± 0.60 ab17.61 ± 1.80 bc21.63 ± 0.63 a16.04 ± 0.39 c
Glycine69.69 ± 7.22 cd129.94 ± 1.19 a95.6 ± 2.75 b86.88 ± 6.35 b85.25 ± 4.36 bc58.37 ± 1.01 d
Alanine30.14 ± 3.46 c55.06 ± 0.09 a42.06 ± 1.93 b45.19 ± 3.56 b33.73 ± 1.70 c33.07 ± 0.48 c
Valine4.30 ± 0.40 b2.32 ± 0.02 c3.97 ± 0.20 b4.36 ± 0.28 b4.72 ± 0.25 ab5.43 ± 0.09 a
Methionine2.37 ± 0.20 ab0.74 ± 0.01 d1.66 ± 0.09 c2.05 ± 0.13 bc2.15 ± 0.15 b2.61 ± 0.03 a
Isoleucine2.90 ± 0.20 b1.56 ± 0.01 d2.08 ± 0.09 c2.99 ± 0.17 b3.07 ± 0.18 b3.66 ± 0.05 a
Leucine4.44 ± 0.33 b2.56 ± 0.01 d3.49 ± 0.13 c4.83 ± 0.25 b5.09 ± 0.28 b6.06 ± 0.11 a
Tyrosine1.86 ± 0.09 b1.03 ± 0.01 d1.50 ± 0.07 c1.88 ± 0.08 b1.98 ± 0.16 b2.37 ± 0.06 a
Phenylalanine2.07 ± 0.12 c0.96 ± 0.07 d1.34 ± 0.08 c1.73 ± 0.09 b1.71 ± 0.05 b1.88 ± 0.01 bc
Lysine30.74 ± 2.84 b21.06 ± 0.00 c20.57 ± 0.93 c27.46 ± 1.52 b31.02 ± 1.15 b36.44 ± 0.16 a
Histidine2.86 ± 0.3 b2.65 ± 0.06 b3.88 ± 0.26 a3.88 ± 0.31 a3.95 ± 0.12 a3.19 ± 0.05 ab
Arginine5.91 ± 0.53 bc3.68 ± 0.00 e5.45 ± 0.09 cd6.77 ± 0.40 b4.48 ± 0.20 de8.24 ± 0.02 a
Total196.24 ± 27.66 c266.93 ± 2.11 a239.48 ± 12.88 ab230.4 ± 17.75 bc226.21 ± 14.56 bc201.56 ± 2.72 c
The different superscripts (a ~ e) in the column denote significant differences (p < 0.05).
Table 3. Phylotype coverage and alpha diversity estimation of bacterial communities in hybrid grouper fillets during storage at 4 °C.
Table 3. Phylotype coverage and alpha diversity estimation of bacterial communities in hybrid grouper fillets during storage at 4 °C.
SampleOTUsShannonSimpsonACEChaoCoverage
Day 0531.3590560.388594105.7616138.250.9997
Day 6510.9294290.614348141.1484831460.9996
Day 10390.8453520.62127950.4807546.583330.9999
OTUs: operational taxonomic units; Shannon: the Shannon index of community diversity; Simpson: the Simpson index of community diversity; ACE: the ACE estimator; Chao: the Chao estimator; Coverage: the good′s community coverage.
Table 4. Volatile compounds of hybrid grouper by HS-SPME-GC-MS at 4 °C.
Table 4. Volatile compounds of hybrid grouper by HS-SPME-GC-MS at 4 °C.
VOCsDay 0Day 2Day 4Day 6Day 8Day 10
Alcohols
1-Penten-3-ol2.43 ± 0.01 c2.40 ± 0.05 c3.91 ± 0.16 dND3.12 ± 0.1 b3.84 ± 0.83 a
1-HeptanolNDND13.11 ± 2.67 a8.71 ± 4.33 bNDND
1-HexanolNDNDNDND7.71 ± 4.24 aND
1-Octen-3-ol18.00 ± 2.83 c21.92 ± 14.21 bc33.47 ± 9.47 ab39.19 ± 4.00 a16.59 ± 4.64 c40.85 ± 3.61 a
2-Ethyl-1-hexanol 207.39 ± 17.32 c127.28 ± 2.00 d137.07 ± 8.22 d568 ± 0.01 a227.46 ± 8.87 c421.15 ± 19.95 b
1-PentanolNDNDND5.72 ± 5.00 aNDND
Aldehydes
Hexanal51.97 ± 7.07 d84.76 ± 11.82 bc111.25 ± 7.91 a64.91 ± 4.7 c34.91 ± 3.27 eND
Heptanal15.03 ± 3.99 bc16.43 ± 2.00 bc21.58 ± 2.59 a16.64 ± 2.15 b10.70 ± 3.61 c3.78 ± 1.04 d
Benzaldehyde16.39 ± 2.6 ab13.53 ± 0.95 b21.97 ± 7.10 a13.31 ± 4.03 bNDND
(E)-2-OctenalNDND6.78 ± 0.00 aNDNDND
Nonanal152.70 ± 11.36 a31.20 ± 8.51 cd55.33 ± 1.05 b41.89 ± 5.99 c18.32 ± 3.95 e20.76 ± 1.07 de
Decanal4.60 ± 1.41 aND3.80 ± 0.94 aNDND3.27 ± 0.33 a
Ketones
AcetylacetoneNDNDNDNDND1.11 ± 0.99 a
2-NonanoneNDND3.63 ± 0.58 b2.79 ± 0.10 cND6.15 ± 0.99 a
Others
TrimethylamineNDNDNDND0.40 ± 0.52aND
Hydrocarbon
Nonane6.34 ± 0.98 bcNDNDNDND8.43 ± 0.95 a
DecaneNDNDNDNDND19.26 ± 1.34 a
Undecane9.11 ± 1.78 aND7.61 ± 0.01 bND6.33 ± 0.80 bND
Naphthalene4.90 ± 0.1 aND6.59 ± 0.92 aND4.60 ± 3.61 a5.50 ± 2.52 a
Dodecane28.07 ± 6.04 a8.46 ± 2.18 c17.09 ± 2.65 b6.51 ± 0.87 c7.96 ± 1.00 c4.23 ±0.10 c
Tridecane53.45 ± 0.31 a11.94 ± 0.83 c30.09 ± 7.51 b9.19 ±1.00 c13.08 ± 1.89 c8.61 ± 0.52 c
Tetradecane15.24 ± 5.29 abND11.63 ± 0.00 bc15.27 ± 1.99 ab10.47 ± 1.00 c18.63 ± 1.42 a
Pentadecane328.65 ± 24.97 a37.98 ± 2.04 b312.99 ± 60.00 a338.00 ± 18.22 a103.08 ± 7.92 b365.61 ± 60.00 a
Hexadecane7.95 ± 0.00 aND6.23 ± 0.00 aNDND9.09 ± 0.00 a
Heptadecane54.73 ± 4.58 a36.32 ± 3.82 c45.26 ± 4.30 b42.83 ± 6.99 bc6.61 ± 1.92 d54.25 ± 0.00 a
Pentadecane111.4 ± 2.56 a46.73 ± 1.92 d84.22 ± 0.21 c99.72 ± 7.01 b23.66 ± 0.34 eND
Styrene5.14 ± 0.86 bcNDND3.9 ± 1.20 c5.91 ± 0.57 b11.17 ± 2.02 a
Caryophyllene18.86 ± 0.01 aND13.69 ± 0.24 b17.49 ± 1.06 abND21.97 ± 5.94 a
Values are means of three independent determinations (n = 3); ND, not detected. Values in the same row followed by different superscript letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, W.; Xie, J. Characterization of the Volatiles and Quality of Hybrid Grouper and Their Relationship to Changes of Microbial Community During Storage at 4 °C. Molecules 2020, 25, 818. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25040818

AMA Style

Huang W, Xie J. Characterization of the Volatiles and Quality of Hybrid Grouper and Their Relationship to Changes of Microbial Community During Storage at 4 °C. Molecules. 2020; 25(4):818. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25040818

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Wenbo, and Jing Xie. 2020. "Characterization of the Volatiles and Quality of Hybrid Grouper and Their Relationship to Changes of Microbial Community During Storage at 4 °C" Molecules 25, no. 4: 818. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25040818

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop