Next Article in Journal
Effect of Collagen Peptide, Alone and in Combination with Calcium Citrate, on Bone Loss in Tail-Suspended Rats
Next Article in Special Issue
Spectroscopic Behaviour of Two Novel Azobenzene Fluorescent Dyes and Their Polymeric Blends
Previous Article in Journal
Destabilization of NaBH4 by Transition Metal Fluorides
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ready Access to Molecular Rotors Based on Boron Dipyrromethene Dyes-Coumarin Dyads Featuring Broadband Absorption

by
Ernesto Enríquez-Palacios
1,
Teresa Arbeloa
2,
Jorge Bañuelos
2,*,
Claudia I. Bautista-Hernández
1,
José G. Becerra-González
1,
Iñigo López-Arbeloa
2 and
Eduardo Peña-Cabrera
1,*
1
Departamento de Química, Universidad de Guanajuato. Noria Alta S/N. Guanajuato, Gto. 36050, Mexico
2
Departamento de Química Física. Universidad del País Vasco-EHU, Apartado 644, 48080 Bilbao, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(4), 781; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25040781
Submission received: 15 January 2020 / Revised: 6 February 2020 / Accepted: 8 February 2020 / Published: 12 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Exclusive Feature Papers in Colorants)

Abstract

:
Herein we report on a straightforward access method for boron dipyrromethene dyes (BODIPYs)-coumarin hybrids linked through their respective 8- and 6- positions, with wide functionalization of the coumarin fragment, using salicylaldehyde as a versatile building block. The computationally-assisted photophysical study unveils broadband absorption upon proper functionalization of the coumarin, as well as the key role of the conformational freedom of the coumarin appended at the meso position of the BODIPY. Such free motion almost suppresses the fluorescence signal, but enables us to apply these dyads as molecular rotors to monitor the surrounding microviscosity.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The design of molecules featuring two or more chromophoric units is of great interest [1,2,3,4]. One can envisage new applications of such systems by taking advantage of the interactions that may develop between the chromophoric units, i.e., energy transfer [5,6], or electron transfer pathways [7], enabling the design of light harvesters with broadband absorption and high pseudo-Stokes shifts [8,9,10,11], or photosensitizers for photovoltaic devices [12,13] mimicking the natural photosynthesis [14,15]. It is crucial to the design of multichromophoric systems to have flexible functionalization methods at one’s disposal that are able to tailor the targeted analogues. In this regard, both boron dipyrromethene dyes (BODIPYs) [16] and coumarins [17] are in themselves two of the more widely used fluorophores (Figure 1), and hence have optimal candidates to design multichromophore ongoing energy transfer processes. Indeed, the former luminophores stand out due to their stability, chemical versatility and tunable photophysical signatures [18,19], whereas the latter fluorophores can be also deeply functionalized and display spectral bands at higher energies than the BODIPY core. Thus, both chromophores are complementary from a spectral point of view, and hence are suitable building blocks to be combined in a single molecular structure towards the promotion of intramolecular energy transfer hops.
Despite the fact that coumarin-BODIPY hybrids are known, and some examples of these dyads can be found in the literature applied as chemosensors [20,21], energy transfer cassettes [22,23] or fluorescent probes for bioimaging [24,25], the photonic performance, and hence the practical applicability of these multifunctional molecular assemblies, can be still improved. Indeed, one of the main drawbacks of these multichromophores is the low absorbance of the coumarin core [26], which falls in the ultraviolet (UV) region and it is usually masked (or at least overlapped) under the more energetic transitions of the BODIPY unit. This feature hampers the application of these dyads, for instance as broadband energy transfer cassettes since, while the energy transfer from the coumarin to the BODIPY is effective, the light harvesting is not greatly improved by the presence of coumarin.
From the synthetic point of view, the utilization of salicylaldehyde as a versatile building block is well-documented [27]. Herein, we show that such an attractive starting material can be rendered fluorescent by attaching it to a BODIPY fragment, thereby opening up new possibilities for the synthesis of more complex products. In this first example, we used the BODIPY-containing salicylaldehyde to prepare BODIPY-coumarin hybrids. Thanks to this methodology, we have been able to decorate the chromene π-system of the coumarin with a battery of aromatic moieties (from functionalized aryl groups with electron donors, i.e., methoxy, or acceptors, i.e., cyano, groups, to pyridine, naphthalene, modified stilbenes, triphenylamine, or benzothiophene). The computationally-aided spectroscopic analysis of this set of dyads allows the selection of the best structural modification at the coumarin subunit to enhance the light harvesting ability along the UV-yellow spectral region towards applying these dyads as energy transfer cassettes.
Furthermore, in view of the conformational flexibility of these dyads around the linking bond between the 8-position of the BODIPY and the coumarin, we anticipated that they could behave as molecular rotors [28,29,30]. Thus, we have conducted additional measurements at different temperatures and controlled viscosities (increasing the amount of ethylene glycol in the medium) to test the viability of these hybrids as fluorescent sensors to monitor the viscosity of the surrounding environment.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis

Salicyladehyde was attached to BODIPY via the Liebeskind-Srogl cross-coupling (LSCC) reaction [31] between commercially available 8-methylthioBODIPY 1 and boronic acid 2 (Scheme 1).
Key boronic acid 2 was prepared by treating commercially available bromide 4 with diboronic acid in the presence of Pd (Scheme 2) [32].
Once we prepared 3, we turned our attention to the method reported by Phakhodee et al. for the synthesis of coumarins starting from substituted salicylaldehydes (Scheme 3) [33].
In this fashion, BODIPY 3 was reacted with 3-bromophenylacetic acid 5 (Scheme 4). The reaction was operationally very simple and was performed between 0 °C and room temperature under air. BODIPY-coumarin 6 precipitates and after filtration and crystallization, it was obtained with a 59% yield.
Next, we studied the scope and limitations of the functionalization of 6, under the Suzuki cross-coupling standard conditions (Table 1).
The yields of the reactions ranged from good to excellent. The Suzuki reaction works efficiently regardless of whether electron-donating or electron-withdrawing boronic acids are used. Heteroarylboronic acids cross-coupled efficiently (entries 5, 7, and 10). Reaction with p-chlorophenylboronic acid (entry 11) gave a complex mixture without a major compound. Presumably, once the initial product is formed, the chlorine atom reacts further under the reaction conditions. An attempt to prepare a dimeric analogue using p-phenyldiboronic acid failed as well. No evidence for the formation of the desired product was observed by NMR of the crude material. Tetraphenylethene derivative 7i was prepared in the hope that it would display aggregation-induced emission (AIE) [34,35,36], however, disappointingly, it did not.

2.2. Photophysical Properties

The spectroscopic properties of the BODIPY-coumarin hybrids in the visible spectral region are ruled by the spectral bands owned to the BODIPY subunit. Indeed, sharp absorption and fluorescence bands were registered at around 500 nm and 520 nm, respectively, regardless of the kind of coumarin appended at the meso position (Figure 2). Therefore, the coumarin subunit is electronically decoupled with the dipyrromethene backbone and the profile of the visible spectral bands of the dyads fully remained to those of the BODIPY alone. However, the presence of such moieties at the sterically unconstrained meso position has a deep impact on the fluorescence response. In fact, the fluorescence efficiency and lifetime harshly decreased due to the presence of the coumarin at an 8-position, yielding values lower than 5% and faster than 500 ps for all the tested compounds (Table S1 in Supplementary Materials). Such sudden enhancement of the non-radiative rate constants was attributed at first sight to the deactivation channels afforded by the free rotation of the 8-coumarin fragment directly linked to the BODIPY. Indeed, low fluorescence efficiencies have been reported for BODIPYs bearing unconstrained aryls at the said key meso position [37,38,39], as supported by the theoretically conducted potential energy curves, which highlight the key role on the photophysics of the conformational freedom around the linkage bond between the BODIPY and the 8-aryls [40,41,42,43].
Whereas no change was detected in the visible absorption and fluorescence, the UV absorption remarkably changed depending on the kind of coumarin placed at the meso position, in particular, on the aromatic functionalization added to the chromene core at 3-position (Figure 2 and Figure S1 in Supplementary Materials). The coumarin absorption band was detected at 325 nn, with its long-wavelength tail overlapped with the more energetic transitions of the BODIPY (S0→S2 and S0→S3, energetically close, and giving a broad and weak band placed at around 375 nm, see 3 in Figure 2). Nevertheless, in the dyads where the coumarin is functionalized with electron-rich groups, like triphenylamine (7a), stilbene (7h and 7i) and benzothiophene (7j), a marked increase in the absorption within 275–375 nm was clearly recorded (up to 2-fold regarding to 6, bearing the simplest coumarin unit, and up to 5 fold with respect to the BODIPY in 3). Indeed, in these last dyads, the molar absorption of the band attributed to the modified coumarin became almost equal to the Vis band of the BODIPY. It is likely that these functionalizations of the chromene core with aromatic groups promote a more π-extended system of the coumarin. Strikingly, such spanning of the conjugation was not reflected in the ensuing pronounced bathochromic shift, but led to a marked enhancement of the absorption probability of the coumarin. It is noteworthy that the spectral profiles of all the compounds remained the same after prolonged UV irradiation or long aging times, evidencing their chemical stability and photostability.
The computationally predicted absorption profiles matched the experimentally recorded ones and support the aforementioned assignment of the spectral bands and their trends with the functionalization of the coumarin (Figure 3 and Figure S2 in Supplementary Materials). The theoretical simulation of the energy gap for the band placed at the UV region was much accurate than for that located in the visible region. This is a typical drawback of the Time Dependent (TD-DFT) method; as the spectral band is shifted to lower energies, the method overestimates the energy gap [44,45]. The predicted visible absorption owned exclusively to the molecular orbitals of the BODIPY (HOMO→LUMO), whose position remained invariant with the type of appended 8-coumarin. Additionally, a UV band was predicted in the spectral region where the highest electronic transition of the BODIPY were placed (Figure 3), but with growing intensity when the coumarin is decorated with electron-rich groups (Figure 3 and Figure S2 in Supplementary Materials). The analysis of the molecular orbitals involved in such transition revealed that it was the consequence of many configurations. For instance, in dye 6, the occupied orbitals were located preferentially at the coumarin moiety (HOMO-1 and -2), but with the electronic density shifted to the pendant phenyl (Figure 3), and eventually reaching the appended aromatic functionalization of such a ring in more complex coumarins. The overlapping with the highest transitions of the BODIPY can be clearly visualized in HOMO-3 (Figure 3), which is delocalized through the whole molecule, although the dipyrrin and the coumarin are electronically decoupled in the ground state. It is noticeable that the virtual orbitals involved in this UV transition are preferentially placed at the BODIPY (LUMO).
Strikingly, just in those dyads bearing electron-rich groups (like the aforementioned triphenylamine, stilbene and benzothiophene), the predicted energetic ordering of the molecular orbitals suggests that they are able to switch on a reductive photoinduced electron transfer (PET) [46,47] pathway. In these dyes, the HOMO is located at the coumarin (7a, bearing a strong electron donor like triphenyalmine) rather than in the dipyrrin as expected. In other words, the energy of the highest occupied orbital of the coumarin falls between the energy gap of the frontier orbitals of the BODIPY. In the rest of dyads with less electron rich coumarins (like 6), the frontier orbitals of the coumarin are placed up and down the orbitals responsible of the visible absorption of BODIPY, hence not interfering with them (Figure 4). As a matter of fact, the presence of electron donor triplenylamine 7a at the coumarin raises the energy of the highest occupied orbital placed at the coumarin around 1.6 eV, being the dyad where the PET is more feasible (Figure 4). Thus, in dyads like 7a, 7i or 7j, after selective excitation of the BODIPY (HOMO-1→LUMO in this case), the electron-rich moieties can inject an electron into the BODIPY (a thermodynamically feasible hop), hampering the fluorescence deactivation. Such PET can be also anticipated from the analysis of the molecular orbitals involved in the UV absorption, since excitation implies transfer of electronic density from the coumarin to the dipyrrin core, supporting the electron donor nature of the 8-appended coumarins (Figure 3). This quenching pathway adds another non-radiative channel to the aforementioned internal conversion enhancement prompted by the 8-aryl free motion, explaining the recorded extremely low fluorescence efficiencies for these BODIPY-coumarin hybrids (Table S1 in Supplementary Materials).
Therefore, these dyads bearing π-extended coumarins (mainly 7a, 7h, 7i and 7j) improve the light harvesting efficiency of the BODIPY-coumarin hybrids, guaranteeing a better and broader collection of the incoming light to promote the ulterior energy transfer. Indeed, in all the dyads regardless of the excitation wavelength and the selectively excited subunit, just the visible emission from the BODIPY was recorded, without any sign of the emission from the coumarin (Figure 2). Thus, the intramolecular excitation energy transfer (intra-EET) from the donor coumarin to the acceptor BODIPY is highly efficient, although the fluorescence output is low owing to the said non-radiative pathways (conformational free rotation around the 8-position of the BODIPY and eventually PET).
Non-fluorescent dyes owing to the said conformational freedom (including dyads, such as coumarin-rhodamine) [48,49], are being currently applied as molecular rotors to monitor the microviscosity of the surrounding environment, even in the cellular media [50,51]. Accordingly, we hypothesized that, in the herein reported BODIPY-coumarin dyads, as the viscosity of the media increases, the free rotation of the 8-aryl should be hampered, and consequently the fluorescence quantum yield should increase and the lifetime lengthen, with this last property being very sensitive to such environmental property in view of the reported results in the bibliography. Therefore, we have tested the performance of dyad 6, as a representative compound of the herein reported BODIPY-coumarin dyads not undergoing PET, as a molecular rotor to monitor the viscosity of the surrounding media. To this aim, firstly we have measured its photophysics in a viscous solvent like ethylene glycol. Successfully, the fluorescence quantum yield and lifetime in this viscous solvent were clearly higher and longer, respectively, (up to around 0.15 and 1 ns, in comparison with the rest of solvents in Table S1 in Supplementary Materials, with values lower than 0.05 and 450 ps, respectively). Such improvement of the fluorescence emission is nicely supported by the recorded fluorescence spectra and decay curves in media with controlled viscosity by means of ethanol/ethylene glycol mixtures (Figure 5). As the viscosity of the media progressively increases the emission spectra becomes more intense and the decay curves slower, suggesting that the free motion of the 8-aryl group is hampered and consequently the associated non-radiative relaxation is also hindered.
Such key influence of the viscosity in the fluorescence response can be also visualized following the evolution of the emission intensity with the temperature in ethylene glycol. Indeed, as the temperature increases, there is more energy available to rotate the 8-aryl and to overcome the impediment afforded by the environmental viscosity. Thus, a heating of the solution progressively decreased the emission efficiency owing to the discussed enhancement of the internal conversion processes (Figure 6). In fact, an activation energy of around 5.3 kcal/mol has been calculated from the evolution of the non-radiative rate, constant with the temperature in ethylene glycol (Figure 6).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

Starting 8-methylthioBODIPY, CuTC, tri(2-furyl)phosphine, and boronic acids are commercially available. Solvents were dried and distilled before use.

3.2. General Procedure for the Suzuki Reaction

In a reaction tube under N2, we dissolved 6 (1.0 equiv), the corresponding boronic acid (2.0 equiv), Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol%), S-Phos (15 mol%), Na2CO3 (2.0 equiv) in a mixture toluene/H2O (4:1, 2.5 mL). The reaction was heated at 90 °C until the starting material was consumed as indicated by thin-layer chromatography (TLC), cooled to room temperature, and then water was added. Then it was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 10 mL), washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered and evaporated to dryness. The crude was filtered through a short silica gel column, and eluted with dichloromethane (DCM). The product was crystalized using DCM/petroleum ether.

3.3. Synthesis and Characterization

1.H and 13C Nuclear magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectra (collected in the Supplementary Materials) were recorded on a Bruker (Billerica, MA, US) Avance III HD 400 (1H, 400MHz; 13C 100 MHz) or Bruker Ultrashield 500 (1H, 500 Mhz; 13C 125 MHZ) in deuteriochloroform (CDCl3), with either tetramethylsilane (TMS) (0.00 ppm 1H, 0.00 ppm 13C), chloroform (7.26 ppm 1H, 77.00 ppm 13C). Data are reported in the following order: chemical shift in ppm, multiplicities (br (broadened), s (singlet), d (doublet), t (triplet), q (quartet), m (multiplet), exch (exchangeable), app (apparent)), coupling constants, J (Hz) and integration. Infrared spectra were recorded on a Perkin Elmer (Waltham, MA, US) Spectrum 100 Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectrophotometer. Peaks are reported (cm1) with the following relative intensities: s (strong, 67–100%), m (medium, 40–67%), and w (weak, 20–40%). Melting points are not corrected. TLC was conducted in Silica gel on TLC Al foils. Detection was done by UV light (254 or 365 nm). High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) samples were determined on a MaXis Impact ESI-QTOF-MS (Bruker Daltonics) by electrospray ionization in positive mode (ESI+) and recorded via the time of fly (TOF) method.
The corresponding reaction conditions for each compound as well as their characterization data are detailed in the Supplementary Materials.

3.4. Spectroscopic Measurements

The photophysical properties were registered using quartz cuvettes with optical pathways of 1 cm in diluted solutions (around 2 × 10−6 M), prepared by adding the corresponding solvent to the residue from the adequate amount of a concentrated stock solution in acetone, after vacuum evaporation of this solvent. Ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) absorption and fluorescence spectra were recorded on a Varian model CARY 4E spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, US), and an Edinburgh Instruments (Livingston, England) spectrofluorimeter (model FLSP920), respectively. Fluorescence quantum yields (ϕ) were obtained using PM546 as a reference (Exciton, ϕr = 0.85 in ethanol). Radiative decay curves were registered with the time correlated single-photon counting technique, as implemented in the aforementioned spectrofluorimeter. Fluorescence emission was monitored at the maximum emission wavelength by using a microchannel plate detector (Hamamatsu C4878) of picosecond time-resolution (20 ps), after excitation with a Fianium pulsed laser (time resolution of around 150 picoseconds). The fluorescence lifetime (τ) was obtained after the deconvolution of the instrumental response signal from the recorded decay curves by means of an iterative method. The goodness of the exponential fit was controlled by statistical parameters (chi-square) and the analysis of the residuals. Radiative (kfl) and non-radiative (knr) rate constants were calculated as follows: kfl = ϕ/τ; knr = (1 − ϕ)/τ.

3.5. Computational Simulations

Ground state energy minimizations were performed using a functional range-separated hybrid wb97xd within the Density Functional Theory (DFT), using the triple valence basis set with a polarization and a diffuse function (6-311+g*). The optimized geometries were taken as a true energy minimum using frequency calculations (no negative frequencies). The conformational search around the linkage bond between the coumarin fragment and the BODIPY at 8-positions suggests that the aforementioned geometry corresponds to the most stable conformer. The absorption profile was simulated with the Time Dependent (TD-DFT) method using the same calculation level and basis set. The Polarizable Continuum Model (PCM) was considered to have a solvent effect (cyclohexane) in all the calculations. All the calculations were performed in Gaussian 16, using the “arina” computational resources provided by the UPV-EHU.

4. Conclusions

Salicylaldehyde was efficiently functionalized with a BODIPY unit via a Liebeskind-Srogl cross-coupling reaction. In a first example of the application of 3 as a building block, a meta-bromophenyl BODIPY-coumarin was prepared from which 10 novel analogues were attained using the Suzuki reaction. The addition of coumarins, functionalized with aromatic moieties, to the meso position of BODIPYs is a suitable synthetically accessible strategy to ameliorate the light harvesting ability of BODIPY-coumarin hybrids. The proper selection of the functional aromatic groups to extend the π-system of the chromene core, enables the enhancement of the absorption probability at the UV-blue region, providing a more efficient and broader light collection for the subsequent excitation energy transfer to the BODIPY. The low fluorescence response of the herein reported dyads is attributed to the conformational freedom of the coumarin around the key meso position and the activation of electron transfer processes when electron-rich groups are tethered at the coumarin subunit.
However, the detrimental impact of the conformational flexibility on the fluorescence response of the BODIPY-coumarin hybrids paves the way to apply them as molecular rotors for the monitorization of the environmental microviscosity. In fact, in those dyads not undergoing PET, the fluorescence efficiency and lifetime progressively increases and lengthens, respectively, with the viscosity of the media. Therefore, these BODIPY-coumarin dyads behave as versatile molecular rotors to quantify the viscosity following the changes of the fluorescence signatures upon excitation almost along the whole UV-yellow spectral region, owing to their broadband light harvesting and ensuing energy transfer.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online; synthetic details and characterization data (IR, NMR, HRMS) of each compound, 1H and 13C-NMR spectra, photophysical data (Table S1), absorption spectra (Figure S1) and computed absorption spectra (Figure S2).

Author Contributions

E.E.-P., C.I.B.-H. and J.G.B.-G. synthesized the compounds and carried out their characterization (IR, NMR, HRMS). T.A. conducted the photophysical measurements. I.L.-A. supervised the spectroscopy study. J.B. carried out the theoretical simulation and wrote the original draft. E.P.-C. designed the compounds, supervised the organic synthesis and wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (project MAT2017-83856-C3-3-P), Gobierno Vasco (project IT912-16), CONACyT (grants 253623, 123732) and Dirección de Apoyo a la Investigación (DAIP-UG CIIC318/2019).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank SGIker of UPV/EHU for technical support with the computational calculations, which were carried out in the “arina” informatic cluster. E.E.-P. and J.G.B.-G. thank CONACyT (Mexico) for graduate fellowship.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Terenziani, F.; Parthasarathy, V.; Pla-Quintana, A.; Maishal, T. Cooperative Two-Photon Absorption Enhancement by Through-Space Interactions in Multichromophoric Compounds. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 8691–8694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Schwartz, E.; Le Gac, S.; Cornelissen, J.J.L.M.; Nolte, R.J.M.; Alan, E.; Rowan, A.E. Macromolecular Multi-chromophoric scaffolding. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 1576–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Teo, Y.N.; Kool, E.T. DNA-Multichromophore Systems. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 4221–4245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Mirkovic, T.; Ostroumov, E.E.; Anna, J.M.; Van Grondelle, R.; Govindjee; Scholes, G.D. Light absorption and energy transfer in the antenna complexes of photosynthetic organisms. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 249–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Fan, J.; Hu, M.; Zhang, P.; Peng, X. Energy transfer cassettes based on organic fluorophores: Construction and applications in ratiometric sensing. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 29–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sen, E.; Meral, K.; Atılgan, S. From Dark to Light to Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET): Polarity-Sensitive Aggregation-Induced Emission (AIE)-Active Tetraphenylethene-Fused BODIPY Dyes with a Very Large Pseudo-Stokes Shift. Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 736–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. D’Souza, F.; Smith, P.M.; Zandler, M.E.; McCarty, A.L.; Itou, M.; Araki, Y.; Ito, O. Energy transfer followed by electron transfer in a supramolecular triad composed of boron dipyrrin, zinc porphyrin, and fullerene: A model for the photosynthetic antenna-reaction center complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 7898–7907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Iehl, J.; Nierengarten, J.-F.; Harriman, A.; Bura, T.; Ziessel, R. Artificial light-harvesting arrays: Electronic energy migration and trapping on a sphere and between spheres. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 988–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Qu, X.; Liu, Q.; Ji, X.; Chen, H.; Zhou, Z.; Shen, Z. Enhancing the Stokes’ shift of BODIPY dyes via through-bond energy transfer and its application for Fe3+-detection in live cell imaging. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 4600–4602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Han, J.; Engler, A.; Qi, J.; Tung, C.-H. Ultra pseudo-Stokes shift near infrared dyes based on energy transfer. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013, 54, 502–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. He, L.; Zhu, S.; Liu, Y.; Xie, Y.; Xu, Q.; Wei, H.; Lin, W. Broadband light-harvesting molecular triads with high FRET efficiency on the coumarin-rhodamine-BODIPY platform. Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 12181–12187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bessette, A.; Hanan, G.S. Design, synthesis and photophysical studies of dipyrromethene-based materials: Insights into their applicattions in organic photovoltaic devices. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 3342–3405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. El-Khouly, M.E.; El-Mohsnawy, E.; Fukuzumi, S. Solar energy conversion: From natural to artificial photosynthesis. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C 2017, 31, 36–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Alstrum-Acevedo, J.H.; Brennaman, M.K.; Meyer, T.J. Chemical approaches to artificial photosynthesis. 2. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 6802–6827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Benniston, A.C.; Harriman, A. Artificial photosynthesis. Mater. Today 2008, 11, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bañuelos, J. BODIPY Dye, the Most Versatile Fluorophore Ever? Chem. Rec. 2016, 16, 335–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Patil, P.O.; Bari, S.B.; Firke, S.D.; Deshmukh, P.K.; Donda, S.T.; Patil, D.A. A comprehensive review on synthesis and designing aspects of coumarin derivatives as monoamine oxidase inhibitors for depression and Alzheimer’s disease. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2013, 21, 2434–2450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Loudet, A.; Burgess, K. BODIPY dyes and their derivatives: Syntheses and spectroscopic properties. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 4891–4932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Boens, N.; Verbelen, B.; Ortiz, M.J.; Jiao, L.; Dehaen, W. Synthesis of BODIPY dyes through postfunctionalization of the boron dipyrromethene core. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2019, 399, 213024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cao, X.; Lin, W.; Yu, Q.; Wang, J. Ratiometric Sensing of Fluoride Anions Based on a BODIPY-Coumarin Platform. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 6098–6101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bai, Y.; Shi, X.; Chen, Y.; Zhu, C.; Jiao, Y.; Han, Z.; He, W.; Guo, Z. Coumarin/BODIPY hybridization for ratiometric sensing of intracellular polarity oscillation. Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 7513–7524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Lv, X.; Liu, Y.; Chen, M.; Wang, P.; Liu, J.; Guo, W. Through-bond energy transfer cassettes based on coumarin–Bodipy/distyryl Bodipy dyads with efficient energy efficiences and large pseudo-Stokes’ shifts. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 13168–13171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Esnal, I.; Duran-Sampedro, G.; Agarrabeitia, A.R.; Bañuelos, J.; García-Moreno, I.; Macias, M.A.; Peña-Cabrera, E.; López-Arbeloa, I.; De la Moya, S.; Ortiz, M.J. Coumarin-BODIPY hybrids by heteroatom linkage: Versatile, tunable and photostable dye lasers for UV irradiation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 8239–8247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Lee, H.; Yang, Z.; Wi, Y.; Kim, T.W.; Verwilst, P.; Lee, Y.H.; Han, G.-i.; Kang, C.; Kim, J.S. BODIPY-coumarin conjugate as an endoplamic reticulum membrane fluidity sensor and its application to ER stress models. Bionconjug. Chem. 2015, 26, 2474–2480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhang, Y.; Song, N.; Li, Y.; Yang, Z.; Chen, L.; Sun, T.; Xie, Z. Comparative study of two near-infrared coumarin-BODIPY dyes for bioimaging and phototermal therapy of cancer. J. Mater. Chem. C 2019, 7, 4717–4724. [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang, P.; Guo, S.; Wang, H.-J.; Chen, K.-K.; Zhang, N.; Zhang, Z.-M.; Lu, T.-B. A broadband and strong visible-light-absorbing photosensitizer boosts hydrogen evolution. Nat. Comm. 2019, 10, 3155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Momahed Heravi, M.; Zadsirjan, V.; Mollaiye, M.; Heydari, M.; Taheri Kal Koshvandi, A. Salicylaldehydes as privileged synthons in multicomponent reactions. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2018, 87, 553–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Alamiry, M.A.H.; Benniston, A.C.; Copley, G.; Elliott, K.J.; Harriman, A.; Stewart, B.; Zhi, Y.-Z. A molecular rotor based on an unhindered boron dipyrromethene (Bodipy) dye. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 4024–4032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Aswathy, P.R.; Sharma, S.; Tripathi, N.P.; Sengupta, S. Regioisomeric BODIPY benzodithiophene dyads and triads with tunable red emission as ratiometric temperature and viscosity sensor. Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25, 14870–14880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Miao, W.; Yu, C.; Hao, E.; Jiao, L. Functionalized BODIPYs as fluorescent molecular rotors for viscosity detection. Front. Chem. 2019, 26, 825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Cheng, H.-G.; Chen, H.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, Q. The Liebeskind-Srogl Cross-Coupling Reaction and its Synthetic Applications. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2018, 7, 490–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Gary, A.; Molander, G.A.; Trice, S.L.J.; Kennedy, S.M. Scope of the Two-Step, One-Pot Palladium-Catalyzed Borylation/Suzuki Cross-Coupling Reaction Utilizing Bis-Boronic Acid. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 8678–8688. [Google Scholar]
  33. Phakhodee, W.; Duangkamol, C.; Yamano, D.; Pattarawarapan, M. Ph3P/I2-Mediated Synthesis of 3-Aryl-Substituted and 3,4-Disubstituted Coumarins. Synlett 2017, 28, 825–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Hong, Y.; Lam, J.W.Y.; Tang, B.Z. Aggregation-induced emission: Phenomenon, mechanism and applications. Chem. Commun. 2009, 4332–4353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Mei, J.; Leung, N.L.C.; Kwok, R.T.K.; Lam, J.W.Y.; Tang, B.Z. Aggregation-induced emission: Together we shine, united we soar. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 11718–11940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Liu, Z.; Jiang, Z.; Yan, M.; Wang, X. Recent progress of BODIPY dyes with aggregation-induced emission. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kee, H.L.; Kirmaier, C.; Yu, L.; Thamyongkit, P.; Youngblood, W.J.; Calder, M.E.; Ramos, L.; Noll, B.C.; Bocian, D.F.; Scheidt, W.R.; et al. Structural control of the photodynamics of boron-dipyrrin complexes. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 20433–20443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Zheng, Q.; Xu, G.; Prasad, P.N. Conformationally restricted dipyrromethene boron difluoride (BODIPY) dyes: Highly fluorescent, multicolored probes for cellular imaging. Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 5812–5819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Reddy, G.; Duvva, N.; Seetharaman, S.; D’Souza, F.; Giribabu, L. Photoinduced energy transfer in carbazole-BODIPY based dyads. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, 27418–27428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, F.; Yang, S.I.; Ciringh, Y.; Seth, J.; Martin III, C.H.; Singh, D.L.; Kim, D.; Birge, R.R.; Bocian, D.F.; Holten, D.; et al. Design, synthesis, and photodynamics of light-harvesting arrays comprised of a porphyrin and one, two or eight boron-dipyrrin accessory pigments. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 10001–10017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ramírez-Ornelas, D.E.; Alvarado-Martínez, E.; Bañuelos, J.; López-Arbeloa, I.; Arbeloa, T.; Mora-Montes, H.M.; Pérez-García, L.A.; Peña-Cabrera, E. FormylBODIPYs: Privileged building blocks for multicomponent reactions. The case of Passerini reaction. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 2888–2898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Prlj, A.; Vannay, L.; Corminboeuf, C. Fluorescence quenching in BODIPY dyes: The role of intramolecular interactions and charge transfer. Helv. Chim. Acta 2017, 100, e1700093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ramírez-Ornelas, D.E.; Sola-Llano, R.; Bañuelos, J.; López Arbeloa, I.; Martínez-Álvarez, J.A.; Mora-Montes, H.M.; Franco, B.; Peña-Cabrera, E. Synthesis, photophysical study, and biological application analysis of complex borondipyrromethene dyes. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 7783–7797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Laurent, A.D.; Adamo, C.; Jacquemin, D. Dye chemistry with time-dependent density functional theory. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 14334–14356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Momeni, M.R.; Brown, A. Why do TD-DFT excitation energies of BODIPY/aza-BODIPY families largely deviate from experiment? Answers from electron correlated and multireference methods. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2015, 11, 2619–2632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mao, M.; Song, Q.-H. The structure-property relationships of D-π-A dyes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem. Rec. 2016, 16, 719–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Greene, L.E.; Lincoln, R.; Cosa, G. Tuning photoinduced electron transfer efficiency of fluorogenic BODIPY-α-tocopherol analogues. Photochem. Photobiol. 2019, 95, 192–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Scholz, N.; Jadhav, A.; Screykar, M.; Behnke, T.; Nirmalananthan, N.; Resch-Genger, U.; Sekar, N. Coumarin-rhodamine hybrids–Novel probes for the optical measurement of viscosity and polarity. J. Fluoresc. 2017, 7, 1949–1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dwivedi, B.K.; Singh, V.D.; Kumar, Y.; Pandey, D.S. Photophysical properties of some novel tetraphenylimidazole derived BODIPY based fluorescent molecular rotors. Dalton Trans. 2020, 49, 438–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kuimova, M.K.; Yahioglu, G.; Levitt, J.A.; Suhling, K. Molecular rotor measures viscosity of live cells via fluorescence lifetime imaging. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 6672–6673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Kuimova, M.K.; Botchway, S.W.; Parker, A.W.; Balaz, M.; Collins, H.A.; Anderson, H.L.; Suhling, K.; Ogilby, P.R. Imaging intracellular viscosity of a single cell during photoinduced cell death. Nat. Chem. 2009, 1, 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.
Figure 1. Structure of boron dipyrromethene dyes (BODIPYs) and coumarins.
Figure 1. Structure of boron dipyrromethene dyes (BODIPYs) and coumarins.
Molecules 25 00781 g001
Scheme 1. LSCC reaction conditions.
Scheme 1. LSCC reaction conditions.
Molecules 25 00781 sch001
Scheme 2. Synthetic access to the boronic acid precursor.
Scheme 2. Synthetic access to the boronic acid precursor.
Molecules 25 00781 sch002
Scheme 3. Synthetic route to access aryl-functionalized coumarins.
Scheme 3. Synthetic route to access aryl-functionalized coumarins.
Molecules 25 00781 sch003
Scheme 4. Reaction between BODIPY and 3-bromophenylacetic acid.
Scheme 4. Reaction between BODIPY and 3-bromophenylacetic acid.
Molecules 25 00781 sch004
Figure 2. UV-Vis absorption and fluorescence (dashed line) of representative BODIPY-coumarin hybrids in diluted solution of cyclohexane. The reference BODIPY not bearing 8-coumarin 3 is also included for comparison. Note that the shape and position of the fluorescence spectra does not change nor with the kind of tethered coumarin neither the excitation wavelength (UV or Vis) owing to the ongoing intra-EET. The absorption spectra of the rest of the dyads are collected in Figure S1 in Supplementary Materials.
Figure 2. UV-Vis absorption and fluorescence (dashed line) of representative BODIPY-coumarin hybrids in diluted solution of cyclohexane. The reference BODIPY not bearing 8-coumarin 3 is also included for comparison. Note that the shape and position of the fluorescence spectra does not change nor with the kind of tethered coumarin neither the excitation wavelength (UV or Vis) owing to the ongoing intra-EET. The absorption spectra of the rest of the dyads are collected in Figure S1 in Supplementary Materials.
Molecules 25 00781 g002
Figure 3. Predicted absorption spectrum (td wb97xd/6-311+g*) and main molecular orbitals and energies (in eV) involved in the electronic transitions for dyad 6. The corresponding spectrum for reference compound 3 (dashed line) is added for comparison. The predicted absorption spectra and molecular orbitals for other representative dyads with π-extended coumarins are collected in Figure S2 in Supplementary Materials.
Figure 3. Predicted absorption spectrum (td wb97xd/6-311+g*) and main molecular orbitals and energies (in eV) involved in the electronic transitions for dyad 6. The corresponding spectrum for reference compound 3 (dashed line) is added for comparison. The predicted absorption spectra and molecular orbitals for other representative dyads with π-extended coumarins are collected in Figure S2 in Supplementary Materials.
Molecules 25 00781 g003
Figure 4. Main calculated molecular orbitals from the optimized geometries (wb97xd/6-311+g*) of the dyads with π-extended coumarins 7a, 7i and 7j, compared with those computed for the dyad bearing the simplest coumarin 6, to illustrate the viability of the electron transfer upon selective excitation of the BODIPY in the former dyads.
Figure 4. Main calculated molecular orbitals from the optimized geometries (wb97xd/6-311+g*) of the dyads with π-extended coumarins 7a, 7i and 7j, compared with those computed for the dyad bearing the simplest coumarin 6, to illustrate the viability of the electron transfer upon selective excitation of the BODIPY in the former dyads.
Molecules 25 00781 g004
Figure 5. Evolution of the (a) fluorescence spectra (scaled by the fluorescence quantum yield) and (b) decay curves of dyad 6 with the content of ethylene glycol in diluted ethanolic solutions.
Figure 5. Evolution of the (a) fluorescence spectra (scaled by the fluorescence quantum yield) and (b) decay curves of dyad 6 with the content of ethylene glycol in diluted ethanolic solutions.
Molecules 25 00781 g005
Figure 6. Evolution of the fluorescence spectra of dyad 6 with the temperature in ethylene glycol. The corresponding Arrhenius plot for the non-radiative rate (knr) constant is also enclosed. The knr data at each temperature was calculated after checking that the absorption spectra are the same regardless of the temperature, and assuming that the radiative rate constant (kfl) does not change with the temperature. In other words, the loss of fluorescence signal upon heating is due solely to an increase of the internal conversion related to the 8-aryl motion.
Figure 6. Evolution of the fluorescence spectra of dyad 6 with the temperature in ethylene glycol. The corresponding Arrhenius plot for the non-radiative rate (knr) constant is also enclosed. The knr data at each temperature was calculated after checking that the absorption spectra are the same regardless of the temperature, and assuming that the radiative rate constant (kfl) does not change with the temperature. In other words, the loss of fluorescence signal upon heating is due solely to an increase of the internal conversion related to the 8-aryl motion.
Molecules 25 00781 g006
Table 1. Scope and limitations of the Suzuki cross-coupling reaction of BODIPI-coumarin 6.a.
Table 1. Scope and limitations of the Suzuki cross-coupling reaction of BODIPI-coumarin 6.a.
Molecules 25 00781 i001
EntryAr-Reaction time (h)% yield bcpd
1 Molecules 25 00781 i00221757a
2 Molecules 25 00781 i00316857b
3 Molecules 25 00781 i00419857c
4 Molecules 25 00781 i00520687d
5 Molecules 25 00781 i00620767e
6 Molecules 25 00781 i00717627f
7 Molecules 25 00781 i00818687g
8 Molecules 25 00781 i00916937h
9 Molecules 25 00781 i0106.5827i
10 Molecules 25 00781 i0117777j
11 Molecules 25 00781 i012-- c7k
12 Molecules 25 00781 i013-- d7l
a Conditions: 6 (1 equiv), boronic acid (2.0 equiv), Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol%), S-Phos (15 mol%), Na2CO3 (2.0 equiv.) /H2O (4:1) at 90 °C. b Isolated yield. c Inseparable complex mixture. d The expected product was not detected by NMR.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Enríquez-Palacios, E.; Arbeloa, T.; Bañuelos, J.; Bautista-Hernández, C.I.; Becerra-González, J.G.; López-Arbeloa, I.; Peña-Cabrera, E. Ready Access to Molecular Rotors Based on Boron Dipyrromethene Dyes-Coumarin Dyads Featuring Broadband Absorption. Molecules 2020, 25, 781. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25040781

AMA Style

Enríquez-Palacios E, Arbeloa T, Bañuelos J, Bautista-Hernández CI, Becerra-González JG, López-Arbeloa I, Peña-Cabrera E. Ready Access to Molecular Rotors Based on Boron Dipyrromethene Dyes-Coumarin Dyads Featuring Broadband Absorption. Molecules. 2020; 25(4):781. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25040781

Chicago/Turabian Style

Enríquez-Palacios, Ernesto, Teresa Arbeloa, Jorge Bañuelos, Claudia I. Bautista-Hernández, José G. Becerra-González, Iñigo López-Arbeloa, and Eduardo Peña-Cabrera. 2020. "Ready Access to Molecular Rotors Based on Boron Dipyrromethene Dyes-Coumarin Dyads Featuring Broadband Absorption" Molecules 25, no. 4: 781. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25040781

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop