Next Article in Journal
Green and Sustainable Valorization of Bioactive Phenolic Compounds from Pinus By-Products
Previous Article in Journal
The (+)-Brevipolide H Displays Anticancer Activity against Human Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: The Role of Oxidative Stress and Akt/mTOR/p70S6K-Dependent Pathways in G1 Checkpoint Arrest and Apoptosis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 25
Issue 12
10.3390/molecules25122930
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Purification of Aqueous Media by Biochars: Feedstock Type Effect on Silver Nanoparticles Removal

by
Agnieszka Tomczyk
1,*,
Katarzyna Szewczuk-Karpisz
1,
Zofia Sokołowska
1,
Milena Kercheva
2 and
Emil Dimitrov
2
1
Institute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Doświadczalna 4, 20-290 Lublin, Poland
2
Institute of Soil Science, Agrotechnology and Plant Protection “N. Poushkarov”, Shosse Bankya 7, Sofia 1080, Bulgaria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(12), 2930; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25122930
Submission received: 20 May 2020 / Revised: 22 June 2020 / Accepted: 24 June 2020 / Published: 25 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Green Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Due to the harmful effects of nanoparticles in the environment, their effective removal from aqueous media is of great importance. This paper described the research on the silver nanoparticles (Ag-NPs) sorption on biochars obtained from different feedstock types. The sorbents were produced through pyrolysis (double-barrel method) of the vineyard (BV), paulownia tree (BP), and tobacco (BT). BV exhibited the highest specific surface area, porosity, value of variable surface charge, and content of surface acidic functional groups among the used biochars. The pseudo-second order model best described the obtained adsorption kinetics, whereas the Freundlich model accounted for the registered adsorption data. The Ag-NPs removal was highly efficient in the case of BV, especially in the nanoparticle concentration range 50–500 mg/L. Thus, this biochar can be considered as an ecofriendly, effective, low-cost organic adsorbent, potentially used in the aqueous media purification.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Currently, in the 21st century, the use of silver nanoparticles (Ag-NPs) is becoming more and more common. These compounds are used in agriculture, medicine, textiles, cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, dentistry, cleaning products, etc., [1] owing to their antibacterial activity against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Forecasts predict that the production of Ag-NPs may reach over 58.000 tons annually between 2011 and 2020 [2]. However, it is also pointed out that the excessive use of Ag-NPs and their appearance in the environment may have a harmful impact on the quality of the environment and the health of organisms [3]. Ag-NPs are treated as a new type of environmental pollution excessively released from consumer products [4]. Ag-NPs, present in textiles, cosmetics or medicines, are released into surface waters and groundwater [5]. Then, they can also reach the soil and organisms living in it [6]. Unfortunately, the modern wastewater treatment systems do not completely remove nanoparticles due to their small size [7]. The regulations regarding water quality describe only acceptable concentrations of elementary metals, such as copper, silver, zinc or titanium in surface, ground, and drinking water, and do not include nanoforms of these elements. Ag-NP analogs of these macroscopic toxic metals may have similar toxicity to the ionic form [4] and threaten aquatic and soil organisms as well as people [8]. The small size and reactivity of nanoparticles enable their penetration into tissues and interference with biochemical processes [9]. The behavior of nanoparticles in the environment depends mainly on conditions such as pH, temperature, and the presence of other chemical compounds [10]. Therefore, these problems should be tested to prevent excessive amounts of nanoparticles in the environment.
Many processes have been proposed for the removal of Ag-NPs from water: adsorption, aeration, and coagulation [11]. Unfortunately, many of them are expensive and inefficient. Adsorption can serve as an alternative. Some natural and synthetic adsorbents for Ag-NP removal have been investigated, e.g., activated carbon [12], dolomite limestone [13], activated sludge [14], natural clinoptilolite [15], nanofiber membrane [16], poly(vinyl alcohol) [17], and ZnO [18]. Biochars can be also promising materials in the removal of nano impurities [10,19]. These solids are inexpensive, economical, and eco-friendly adsorbents.
Biochar is a carbon-rich material formed as a result of biomass pyrolysis [20]. It can be used not only as a renewable fuel, but also as an addition improving aqueous media [21]. Biochar exhibits a high carbon content as well as a substantial concentration of micro- and macro-elements (including potassium, sodium, magnesium, and calcium). This material is generally characterized by a high specific surface area and a high content of surface functional groups [19,22,23,24]. Hernandez-Mena et al. [24] showed that biochar has a high porosity, with longitudinal pores with sizes from micro- to macro-pores.
In the literature, there are many articles discussing the negative effects of nanoparticles on natural environments and living organisms. Numerous alarming data were published, and therefore the investigation of a protection method against nanoparticles is of great importance. It must also be emphasized that no comprehensive solution has been proposed yet. Due to the fact that there are no reports in the literature describing Ag-NP separation from aqueous solutions by natural organic adsorbents, this paper was aimed at the efficiency of metallic nanoparticle (Ag-NP) removal by biochars. In this way, the study adopted a comprehensive, innovative approach to the above issue. The performed experiments included the following three steps: (i) study of the impact of various kinds of feedstock on the structure of biochar, (ii) study of the adsorption kinetics and equilibrium isotherm of adsorption Ag-NPs on biochars, (iii) evaluation of the efficiency of biochars in Ag-NP removal from aqueous media.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Characteristic of Ag-NPs

The results presented in Figure 1 show characteristics of Ag-NPs obtained by the chemical reduction method.
The synthesized Ag-NPs (Figure 1) were obtained as a green colloid solution and were characterized by UV–VIS spectrophotometric analysis in Figure 1B, and showed a maximum peak of absorbance at 440 nm. The results of the CPS analysis of the Ag-NP solution are presented in Figure 1A. They showed that the particles of diameters equal to 46 nm were the most numerous in the examined sample. The shape of the Ag-NPs was cube [25]. The Ag-NPs did not form aggregates (also after 70 min corresponding with the adsorption time). The nanoparticle solution was stable for 4 days (after this time silver precipitated).

2.2. Biochar Characteristics

The experiments included three discrete biochars: vineyard (BV), paulownia tree (BP), and tobacco (BT). The results presented in Table 1 as well as in Figure 4 showed clear differences among biochars obtained from different biomasses.
Biochar samples exhibited a relatively high variable surface charge Q. BV was characterized by the highest Q parameter, while BT by the lowest. Q provides information about the presence of surface functional groups: carboxylic, phenolic, and lactonic groups. This was confirmed by Boehm’s method. BV exhibited the highest content of surface acidic functional groups, and BT the lowest. This effect was attributed to the content of lignin or cellulose in the biomass [26].
The obtained results also indicated that the biochars BV and BP had similar textural properties. They are characterized by a high content of pores of an average diameter of about 2 nm and a relatively high specific surface area equal to 98.9 and 83.9 m2/g for BV and BP, respectively. The total pore volume is 0.04 for the BV and 0.03 cm3/g for the BP. On the other hand, the BT has poor porosity parameters. It contains large mesopores of an average diameter of 19.9 nm. Moreover, its SBET parameter equals 1.9 m2/g, whereas its Vt parameter equals only 0.01 cm3/g. This is dictated by different thermal degradations of biomass. During pyrolysis, volatile matter is released to varying degrees, which creates differences in micropore contribution and pore volume, as well as specific surface area [26].
Experimental data obtained from the FTIR analysis are presented in Figure 2.
All spectra contained specific bands corresponding with O–H groups stretching (~3390–3430 cm−1), methyl C–H groups stretching (~2910 cm−1), methylene C–H groups stretching (~2850 cm−1), deformation of C−H bond in aliphatic and alicyclic systems (~1380 and 1420 cm−1), the stretching of C–O–C and –OH groups of esters associated with the degradation of cellulose and hemicelluloses (~1080–1100 cm−1), and the stretching of C–H groups in aromatic structures (~800–880 cm−1). Additionally, the spectra of BV and BP contained the bands that can be attributed to the vibrations of C–O bonds in carboxylic and lactone groups as well as the stretching of C–C groups present in aromatic rings (~1560 and 1740 cm−1). The spectrum of BP was also characterized by the band corresponding with the C–O–C stretching of aryl ethers, as well as phenolic groups associated with the degradation of lignin (~1260 cm−1). The bands occurring around ~620–720 cm−1, visible on every spectrum, may be associated with mineral matter.
Many studies confirmed that the content of surface acidic functional groups, as well as the value of SBET of biochars, influence their adsorption capacity [27]. For example, Tomczyk et al. [28] showed that wood biochar had a large adsorption capacity relative to Cu, which was associated with a high value of SBET. Wang et al. [29] and Sumaraj et al. [30] reported that surface functional groups of biochar: –COOH, –OH, and –COR, had a high impact on the heavy metal adsorption level.

2.3. Kinetics of Ag-NPs Adsorption on Biochar

The experimental Ag-NP adsorption kinetics with the fits obtained from a pseudo-second order equation are presented in Figure 3. The results showed that the time of 70 min was sufficient to reach equilibrium. This time was used in the measurements of Ag-NP adsorption isotherms. The kinetic parameters, presented in Table 2, showed clear differences among experimental biochars.
Experimental kinetic isotherms were fitted to the two following theoretical adsorption models: the pseudo-first order model (Equation (2)) and the pseudo-second order model (Equation (3)). The pseudo-second-order model matched better experimental data (the squared correlation coefficient R2 was higher than 0.98) compared to the pseudo-first-order model (Table 2). Ruíz-Baltazar et al. [15] reported that the experimental data of Ag-NPs adsorbed on the natural clinoptilolite fitted better with the pseudo-second-order model. Furthermore, Dhandayuthapani et al. [17] observed that the pseudo-second-order model has the best fit to a series of Ag-NP adsorption on poly(vinyl) alcohol data.
Ho and McKay [31] reported that the high value of the R2 suggests multiple adsorption kinetic mechanisms, i.e., surface binding interactions that precede chemisorption and precipitation. Based on the obtained rate constants, it was found that the fastest adsorption occurred on BV k2 = 0.44 × 10−2 g/mg·min and the slowest on BT k2 = 0.1 × 10−2 g/mg·min. Similar observations were reported by Banach et al. [13] which proved that Ag-NP adsorption on dolomite limestone was fast (0.15 × 10−2 g/mg·min).
The adsorption capacity of BV (88.9 mg/g) was the highest among all biochars (75.2 mg/g for BP and 72.5 mg/g for BT). It has been noted in previous studies that adsorption capacity depends on the kind of adsorbent. These parameters equaled 8.38 × 10−4 mg/g for natural clinoptilolite [15], 47.56 mg/g for ZnO [18], and 143.40 mg/g for nanofiber membrane [16].

2.4. Equilibrium Adsorption of Ag-NPs on Biochar

Figure 4 presents plots that compare experimental data with the fits obtained from the theoretical Freundlich model.
The parameters calculated from the selected models were summarized in Table 3. The coefficients of R2 were determined using linear regression.
By analyzing the theoretical and experimental points, it was concluded that Freundlich isotherms best describe silver nanoparticle adsorption on all biochars. The Freundlich model yielded the squared correlation coefficient R2 > 0.97, and the Langmuir model produced R2 > 0.69. The values of 1/n were, respectively, equal to 0.41 for BV, 0.72 for BP, and 0.92 for BT. The parameter 1/n was below 1, which proved that the surfaces of the experimental biochars were heterogeneous. The lowest 1/n value indicated that BV possessed the most heterogeneous surface. The calculated Freundlich constant KF was 0.46 [mg/g(L/mg]1/n for BV, 1.69·10−6 for BP, and 6.01·10−9 for BT. Banach et al. [13] observed that the adsorption of Ag-NPs on dolomite limestone also fitted better to the Freundlich model. Similar conclusions were formulated during the study on Ag-NP adsorption on activated carbon. In that case, it was reported that 1/n was below 1 (0.75) and KF was 1.8 [mg/g(L/mg]1/n [12].
It should also be mentioned that the Ag-NP adsorption on BP and BT reached the equilibrium for lower concentrations than on BV. The isotherm curve for BP and BT achieved equilibrium for initial Ag-NP concentrations equal to and greater than 50 mg/L. In turn, in the case of BV the equilibrium state was reached for the initial Ag-NP concentrations equal to and higher than 350 mg/L. This difference was probably dictated by the most heterogeneous surface of BV. Among tested solids, the vineyard biochar was characterized by the highest variable surface charge, the largest specific surface area, and the largest micropore volume. This biochar adsorbs the largest amount of nanoparticles from aqueous solution.
The values of Ag-NP removal efficiency for the initial Ag-NP concentration 500 ppm, calculated from experimental data, were 95.2% for BV, 51.7% for BP, and 34.7% for BT. This indicated that 24.1 mg/L (4.8%) of nanoparticles in the case of BV, 241.6 mg/L (48.3%) in the case of BP, and 326.7 (65.3%) in the case of BT remained in the solution. In turn, the Ag-NPs removal efficiency for the initial Ag-NP concentration 50 ppm, calculated from experimental data, were 57.2% for BV, 50.7% for BP, and 27.5% for BT. In these systems 21.4 mg/L (42.8%, BV), 24.6 mg/L (49.3%, BP), and 36.25 mg/L (72.5%) of nanoparticles remained in the solution. The chemical character of the Ag-NP adsorption process on the biochar surface is dictated by the hydrogen bond formation between oxygen atoms within acidic residues of adsorbent and –OH groups of Ag-NPs [10]. The hydroxyl groups are present in the structure of ascorbic acid stabilizing nanoparticles. These moieties are the most protruding groups of Ag-NPs and act as proton donors. In turn, oxygen atoms of biochar surface groups are proton acceptors. Uchimiya et al. [10] observed that hydrogen bonds are also created between a gold nanoparticle-bound citrate capping agent and surface carboxyl groups present on biochar produced at 300 °C. Furthermore, Banach et al. [13] reported that Ag-NPs were also adsorbed on dolomite limestone by hydrogen bonds.
Based on the results of the performed adsorption study, it can be stated that biochar obtained by vineyard pyrolysis is the best adsorbent of Ag-NPs in their concentration range 50–500 mg/L. This biochar may be considered as a potential, eco-friendly adsorbent used in water purification. BV has the highest content of acidic functional groups (carboxylic and phenolic ones) and well-developed specific surface area. Due to these facts, it has the greatest affinity to create hydrogen bonds with Ag-NP. Its adsorption capacity relative to silver nanoparticles is the highest (among all tested solids). The high adsorption level on the vineyard biochar surface was also confirmed by SEM observations and EDS analysis. The obtained images are presented in Figure 5.
These showed the surface morphology of biochar before and after the Ag-NP adsorption. The SEM image of BV showed that biochar had a heterogeneous surface. The white and pink points were attributed to Ag-NPs adsorbed on BV. The BV surface was partially covered with Ag-NPs. Adsorbed nanoparticles may have formed clusters on the solid. Besides silver nanoparticles, biochar was also used in the removal of other contaminants, e.g., heavy metals [28,32,33], dyes [34,35], gold nanoparticles [10], antibiotics [36,37], and PAH [38,39].

3. Materials and Methods

The biochars were produced during the biomass pyrolysis process, which is called the “double barrel method” [40]. The temperature reached in the kiln was not measured in our study. Deal et al. [40] estimated that the highest temperature reached inside such a double-barrel kiln by slow pyrolysis was between 400 and 600 °C at the top and between 600 and 800 °C at the bottom. At the beginning, biochars were air-dried and sieved through 2 mm meshes.

3.1. Specific Surface Area

Textural properties of the used biochars were determined using low-temperature nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms method (sorptometer ASAP 2420, Micrometrics, Norcross, GA, USA). Before the measurement, the solids were degassed at 200 °C under vacuum. Specific surface area (SBET) and pore size distribution (PSD) of the samples were calculated using BET and BJH methods. The total pore volume (Vt) was established at a relative pressure p/p0 = 0.99.

3.2. Ag-NPs Synthesis

The silver nanoparticles (Ag-NPs) were obtained by the chemical reduction method [25]. Silver nitrate (AgNO3) was used as a silver nanoparticle precursor. Ascorbic acid was used as a reducing agent, whereas polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) was used as a stabilizer. For the preparation of aqueous solutions, deionized water was used. A total of 75 mg of AgNO3 was added into 150 mL of deionized water containing 5 g of PVP and such prepared solution was heated to 100 °C. Then, the aqueous solution of ascorbic acid in the molecular ratio AgNO3/C6H8O6 equal to 1.2 was added dropwise into the silver nitrate solution and stirred for 1 h. The above method allowed the Ag-NP solution with a concentration of 500 mg/L to be obtained. UV-VIS spectra were recorded with a 1 cm path length quartz cell at a resolution of 1 nm from 300–700 using a Jasco V-530 UV/VIS Spectrophotometer (Tokyo, Japan). Deionized water was used as the reference sample to take the blank spectrum for all measurements.

3.3. The Average Size of Ag-NPs

The average size of Ag-NPs was determined using a CPS analyzer (CPS Instruments, Anaheim, CA, USA). In this method, the particle diameter is calculated by the software based on the changes in the light absorption during the measurement. The disc rate was set to the value of 22,000 rpm. The sucrose solutions with the concentrations of 8 and 24% were used in the gradient preparation. The particle diameter was measured in the range of 10–250 nm. The Ag-NP solution used in the study had the concentration of 500 ppm.

3.4. Quantitative Determination of Surface Functional Groups

The determination of surface oxygen groups was carried out using the Boehm titration [41]. This method is based on the assumption that the acidic constants of carboxylic, lactonic, and phenolic groups differ by several orders of magnitude, and therefore it is possible to neutralize these groups with properly selected reagents. The acidity of individual functional groups depends on their location and environment, i.e., on the size of the layers and the type or position of the other substituent.

3.5. Determination of the Distribution of the Surface Negative Charge and Dissociation Constants of Functional Groups

The measurements were made using a Titrino 702 SM (Metrohm, Herisau, Switzerland), an automatic titrator. Based on the potentiometric data obtained in the experiment, variable surface charge Q was calculated [42].

3.6. Qualitative Determination of Surface Functional Groups—FTIR Spectroscopy

The chemical character of the biochar surface was determined using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). The spectra were obtained using Nicolet 8700A FTIR spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Somerset, NJ, USA). The samples were prepared in the form of pellets with KBr.

3.7. SEM Analysis

Scanning electron microscopy (Phenom ProX, Thermo Fisher Instruments, Somerset, NJ, USA) was used to examine surface morphology of biochar before and after the adsorption process. The presence of Ag-NPs on the biochar surface was confirmed by EDS analysis (energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy).

3.8. Batch Adsorption Experiment

A total of 40 mg of biochar was added to 8 mL of the Ag-NP solutions (500 mg/L for kinetics and 0, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 350, 400, and 500 mg/L for equilibrium measurements). The suspensions were permanently mixed (about 5, 15, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, and 80 min for kinetics and about 70 min for equilibrium adsorption) with rotators under constant pH conditions (5.0 ± 0.1), at room temperature (19 ± 2 °C). After completion of Ag-NP adsorption on biochar, the solutions were filtered, and the concentration was measured using a UV/VIS spectrophotometer at λ = 440 nm. The process was repeated three times for all samples, and the graphing points were obtained from the averages.
The Ag-NPs adsorbed amount (mg/g) was calculated as follows:
q e = ( C 0 − C e ) · V m ,
where C0 is the initial concentration of heavy metal (mg/L), Ce is the heavy metal concentration at equilibrium (mg/L), m is the mass of the sample (mg), and V is the volume of the solution (L).
The pseudo-first order [43], used in Equation (2), and the pseudo-second order [31], used in Equation (3), were selected among different models that can be applied to describe the adsorption kinetics. These equations are represented by the following linearized equations:
ln ( q e − q t ) = ln q e − k 1 · t ,
t q t = 1 k 2 · q e 2 + t q e ,
where qt (mg/g) is the Ag-NP removal capacity at time t (min), qe (mg/g) is the Ag-NP removal capacity at equilibrium, and k1 (1/min) and k2 (g/mg·min) are the reaction rate constants.
Two of the most common equations in the literature (Freundlich and Langmuir isotherms) were used to describe adsorption processes. The Freundlich isotherm was one of the simplest, originally introduced in the study of adsorption on animal charcoal [44]. Sips [45] proved that the Freundlich isotherm can describe adsorption on energetically heterogeneous surfaces that are characterized by an exponential distribution of the adsorption sites with energy.
The Freundlich isotherm is expressed as follows:
q e = K F [ C e a m ] n ,
where qe is the amount of adsorbed Ag-NPs at equilibrium (mg/g), Ce is the equilibrium concentration of adsorbate in the solution (mg/L), and KF (in units of qe) and n (0 < n < 1) are the Freundlich constants (mg/g(L/mg)1/n), which represent the adsorption capacity and the “heterogeneity parameter”, respectively. The parameter am is a formal parameter equal to the unity in the units of Ce that was introduced in order to display correct units on both sides of Equation (4).
Langmuir isotherm [46] is expressed as follows:
q e = Q m K L C e 1 + K L C e ,
where Qm is the maximum number of Ag-NPs in the monomolecular layer (mg/g) and KL is the Langmuir constant related to the affinity of the adsorbate for active sites (L/mg). This equation can be used if the adsorption process does not lead to the development of multilayers, or does not occur in pores or with capillary condensation.
The efficiency, E (%), of Ag-NP removal can be expressed as follows:
E % = C A C 0 · 100 % ,
where CA is the concentration of sorbed nanoparticles (mg/L) and C0 is the initial concentration (mg/L).

4. Conclusions

This research investigated the ability of biochars to adsorb Ag-NPs in aqueous media. The feedstock type influence on the textural and surface biochar characteristics, such as the specific surface area, porosity, variable surface charges, and the content of functional surface acidic groups, was also determined. The obtained results showed that BV exhibited the highest specific surface area, porosity, variable surface charge, and content of surface acidic functional groups among all tested biochars. The adsorption kinetics of Ag-NPs on biochars were well-described by the pseudo-second-order model, whereas Ag-NP adsorption isotherms by the Freundlich model. The correlation coefficient was above 0.97. The Ag-NP adsorption capacities were 88.9 mg/g for BV, 75.2 mg/g for BP, and 72.5 mg/g for BT. Ag-NP removal efficiency was the highest for the biochar produced from the vineyard (95.2%). Therefore, the selected biochar is an efficient adsorbent of silver nanoparticles in their concentration range of 50–500 mg/L and may be considered as an eco-friendly material used in water purification. The examined adsorption was probably based on the hydrogen bond creation between oxygen atoms present on the biochar surface and hydroxyl groups of ascorbic acid stabilizing Ag-NPs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.T.; data curation, A.T., K.S.-K. and Z.S.; formal analysis, A.T. and K.S.-K.; investigation, A.T.; methodology, A.T. and K.S.-K.; resources, M.K. and E.D.; software, A.T. and K.S.-K.; supervision, Z.S.; validation, A.T. and K.S.-K.; visualization, Z.S.; writing—original draft, A.T. and K.S.-K.; writing—review and editing, A.T., K.S.-K. and Z.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Research was partially conducted under the project “Water in soil - satellite monitoring and improving the retention using biochar” no. BIOSTRATEG3/345940/7/NCBR/2017 which was financed by the Polish National Centre for Research and Development in the framework of “Environment, agriculture and forestry”—BIOSTRATEG strategic R&D programme.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Stensberg, M.C.; Wei, Q.; McLamore, E.S.; Porterfield, D.M.; Wei, A.; Sepulveda, M.S. Toxicological studies on silver nanoparticles: Challenges, opportunities in assessment, monitoring and imaging. Nanomedicine 2012, 6, 879–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Jo, H.J.; Choi, J.W.; Lee, S.H.; Hong, S.W. Acute toxicity of Ag and CuO nanoparticle suspensions against Daphnia magna: The importance of their dissolved fraction varying with preparation methods. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 227–228, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhu, X.; Zhu, L.; Chen, Y.; Tian, S. Acute toxicities of six manufactured nanomaterial suspensions to Daphnia magna. J. Nanopart. Res. 2009, 11, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Krzyżewska, I.; Kyzioł-Komosińska, J.; Rosik-Dulewska, C.; Czupioł, J.; Antoszczyszyn-Szpicka, P. Inorganic nanomaterials in the aquatic environment: Behavior, toxicity, and interaction with environmental elements. Arch. Environ. Prot. 2016, 42, 87–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Syberg, K.; Hansen, S.F. Environmental risk assessment of chemicals and nanomaterial-The best foundation for regulatory decision-making. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 541, 784–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Samarajeewa, A.D.; Velicogna, J.R.; Princz, J.I.; Subasinghe, R.M.; Scroggins, R.P. Effect of silver Nanoparticles on soil microbial growth, activity and community diversity in a sandy loam soil. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 220, 504–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gottschalk, F.; Ort, C.; Scholz, R.W.; Nowack, B. Engineered nanomaterials in rivers—Exposure scenarios for Switzerland at high spatial and temporal resolution. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159, 3439–3445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bicho, R.C.; Santos, F.C.F.; Scott-Fordsmand, J.J.; Amorim, M.J.B. Effects of copper oxide nanomaterials (CuONMs) are life stage dependent-full life cycle in Enchytraeus crypticus. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 224, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Schlich, K.; Beule, L.; Hund-Rinke, K. Single versus repeated applications of CuO and Ag nanomaterials and their effect on soil microflora. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 215, 322–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Uchimiya, M.; Pignatello, J.J.; White, J.C.; Hu, S.-L.; Ferreira, P.J. Surface interactions between gold nanoparticles and biochar. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 5027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Syafiuddin, A.; Fulazzaky, M.A.; Salmiati, S.; Kueh, A.; Fulazzaky, M.; Salim, M.R. Silver nanoparticles adsorption by the synthetic and natural adsorbent materials: An exclusive review. Nanotechnol. Environ. Eng. 2020, 5, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gicheva, G.; Yordanov, G. Removal of citrate-coated silver nanoparticles from aqueous dispersions by using activated carbon. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2013, 431, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Banach, M.; Bukała, A.; Pulit-Prociak, J.; Staroń, P. Equilibrium and kinetics of nanosilver sorption from aqueous solutions. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2016, 16, 7898–7909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhou, X.X.; Li, Y.J.; Liu, J.F. Highly efficient removal of silver-containing nanoparticles in waters by aged iron oxide magnetic particles. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 5468–5476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ruíz-Baltazar, A.; Reyes-López, S.Y.; Tellez-Vasquez, O.; Esparza, R.; Rosas, G.; Pérez, R. Analysis for the sorption kinetics of Ag nanoparticles on natural clinoptilolite. Adv. Condens. Matter. Phys. 2015, 284518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Padil, V.V.T.; Stuchlík, M.; Černík, M. Plasma modified nanofibres based on gum kondagogu and their use for collection of nanoparticulate silver, gold and platinum. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 121, 468–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Dhandayuthapani, B.; Mallampati, R.; Sriramulu, D.; Dsouza, R.F.; Valiyaveettil, S. PVA/gluten hybrid nanofibers for removal of nanoparticles from water. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2014, 2, 1014–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mallampati, R.; Valiyaveettil, S. Biomimetic metal oxides for the extraction of nanoparticles from water. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 3395–3399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Awual, M.R. Novel ligand functionalized composite material for efficient copper (II) capturing from wastewater sample. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 172, 387–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Malińska, K. Biowęgiel odpowiedzią na aktualne problem ochrony środowiska. Inż. Ochr. Środ. 2012, 15, 387–403. [Google Scholar]
  21. Weber, K.; Quicker, P. Properties of biochar. Fuel 2018, 217, 240–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lehmann, J.; Joseph, S. Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology; Earthscan: London, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  23. Duan, S.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Shao, D.; Hayat, T.; Alsaedi, A.; Li, J. Removal of U (VI) from aqueous solution by amino functionalized flake graphite prepared by plasma treatment. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 4073–4085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hernandez-Mena, L.E.; Pécora, A.A.B.; Beraldo, A.L. Slow pyrolysis of bamboo biomass: Analysis of biochar properties. AIDIC 2014, 37, 115–120. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zielińska, A.; Skwarek, E.; Zaleska, A.; Gazda, M.; Hupka, J. Preparation of silver nanoparticles with controlled particle size. Proc. Chem. 2009, 1, 1560–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Wang, G.; Zhang, S.; Yao, P.; Chen, Y.; Xu, X.; Li, T.; Gong, G. Removal of Pb (II) from aqueous solutions by Phytolacca americana L. biomass as a low cost biosorbent. Arab. J. Chem. 2018, 11, 99–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Raveendran, K.; Ganesh, A. Adsorption characteristic and pore-development of biomass pyrolysis char. Fuel 1998, 77, 769–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tomczyk, A.; Boguta, P.; Sokołowska, Z. Biochar efficiency in Cu removal from Haplic soils. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 16, 4899–4912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Wang, X.; Li, X.; Liu, G.; He, Y.; Chen, C.; Liu, X.; Li, G.; Gu, L.; Zhao, Y. Mixed heavy metal removal from wastewater by using discarded mushroom-stick biochar: Adsorption properties and mechanisms. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 2019, 21, 584–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sumaraj; Xiong, Z.; Sarmah, A.K.; Padhye, L.P. Acidic surface functional groups control chemisorption of ammonium onto carbon materials in aqueous media. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 698, 134193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ho, Y.S.; McKay, G. Pseudo-second-order model for sorption process. Process Biochem. 1999, 34, 451–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Szewczuk-Karpisz, K.; Nowicki, P.; Sokołowska, Z.; Pietrzak, R. Hay-based activated biochars obtained using two different heating methods as effective low-cost sorbents: Solid surface characteristics, adsorptive properties and aggregation in the mixed Cu(II)/PAM system. Chemosphere 2020, 250, 126312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kołodyńska, D.; Wnętrzak, R.; Leahy, J.J.; Kwapiński, W.; Hayes, M.H.B.; Hubicki, Z. Kinetic and adsorptive characterization of biochar in metal ions removal. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 197, 295–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sewu, D.D.; Boakye, P.; Woo, S.H. Highly efficient adsorption of cationic dye by biochar produced with Korean cabbage waste. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 224, 206–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Abd-Elhamid, A.I.; Emran, M.; El-Sadek, M.H.; El-Shanshory, A.A.; Soliman, H.M.A.; Akl, M.A.; Rashad, M. Enhanced removal of cationic dye by eco-friendly activated biochar derived from rice straw. Appl. Water Sci. 2020, 10, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Peng, B.; Chen, L.; Que, C.; Yang, K.; Deng, F.; Deng, X.; Shi, G.; Xu, G.; Wang, M. Adsorption of Antibiotics on Graphene and Biochar in Aqueous Solutions Induced by π-π Interactions. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 31920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Chen, Y.; Shi, J.; Du, Q.; Zhang, H.; Cui, Y. Antibiotic removal by agricultural waste biochars with different forms of iron oxide. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 14143–14153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Anasonye, F.; Tammeorg, P.; Parshintsev, J.; Riekkola, M.J.; Tuomela, M. Role of biochar and fungi on PAH sorption to soil rich in organic matter. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2018, 229, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Ukalska-Jaruga, A.; Debaene, G.; Smreczak, B. Dissipation and sorption processes of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) to organic matter in soils amended by exogenous rich-carbon material. J. Soils Sediments 2020, 20, 836–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Deal, C.; Brewer, C.E.; Brown, R.C.; Okure, M.A.; Amoding, A. Comparison of kiln-derived and gasifier-derived biochars as soil amendments in the humid tropics. Biomass Bioenerg. 2012, 37, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Schönherr, J.; Buchheim, J.R.; Sholz, P.; Adelhelm, P. Boehm titration revisited (Part I): Practical aspects for achieving a high precision in quantifying oxygen-containing surface groups on carbon materials. Carbon 2018, 4, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Józefaciuk, G. Effect of acid and alkali treatments on surface-charge properties of selected minerals. Clay Miner. 2002, 50, 647–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lagergren, S. Zur theorie der sogenannten adsorption geloster stoffe. Kunglinga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens. Handlingar 1898, 24, 1–39. [Google Scholar]
  44. Freundlich, H.M. Over the adsorption in solution. J. Phys. Chem. A 1906, 57, 385–470. [Google Scholar]
  45. Sips, R. On the structure of a Catalyst Surface. J. Chem. Phys. 1950, 18, 1024–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Langmuir, I. The constitution and fundamental properties of solids and liquids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1916, 38, 2221–2295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
Molecules 25 02930 g001 550
Figure 1. Characteristics of Ag-NPs: (A) particle number (in billions) vs. particle diameter and (B) UV–VIS absorption spectrum.
Figure 1. Characteristics of Ag-NPs: (A) particle number (in billions) vs. particle diameter and (B) UV–VIS absorption spectrum.
Molecules 25 02930 g001
Molecules 25 02930 g002 550
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of biochars: (A) vineyard (BV); (B) paulownia tree (BP), and (C) tobacco (BT).
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of biochars: (A) vineyard (BV); (B) paulownia tree (BP), and (C) tobacco (BT).
Molecules 25 02930 g002
Molecules 25 02930 g003 550
Figure 3. Pseudo-second order adsorption kinetics of Ag-NPs on biochars.
Figure 3. Pseudo-second order adsorption kinetics of Ag-NPs on biochars.
Molecules 25 02930 g003
Molecules 25 02930 g004 550
Figure 4. Freundlich adsorption isotherms of Ag-NPs on biochars.
Figure 4. Freundlich adsorption isotherms of Ag-NPs on biochars.
Molecules 25 02930 g004
Molecules 25 02930 g005 550
Figure 5. The SEM images of BV before (A) and after (B) adsorption (white color: Ag-NPs) and the results of EDS analysis (C) of the selected biochar after adsorption (blue color: carbon, green color: oxygen, pink color: silver).
Figure 5. The SEM images of BV before (A) and after (B) adsorption (white color: Ag-NPs) and the results of EDS analysis (C) of the selected biochar after adsorption (blue color: carbon, green color: oxygen, pink color: silver).
Molecules 25 02930 g005
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of biochars obtained from different biomasses (Q: variable surface charge, SBET: specific surface area, Vt: total pore volume, Vm: micropore volume, M: micropore contribution, D: average pore diameter).
Table 1. Characteristics of biochars obtained from different biomasses (Q: variable surface charge, SBET: specific surface area, Vt: total pore volume, Vm: micropore volume, M: micropore contribution, D: average pore diameter).
Type BiocharQ [cmol/kg]Carboxylic Groups [cmol/kg]Lactonic Groups [cmol/kg]Phenolic Groups [cmol/kg]SBET [m2/g]Vt [cm3/g]Vm [cm3/g]M [%]D [nm]
BV99.726.734.9104.198.960.0490.03775.52.02
BP66.713.89.892.383.970.0410.03482.91.96
BT48.66.923.820.71.920.00960.001515.619.94
Table
Table 2. Kinetic parameters of Ag-NP adsorption on biochars (qe-Ag-NP removal capacity at equilibrium; k1, k2-reaction rate constants).
Table 2. Kinetic parameters of Ag-NP adsorption on biochars (qe-Ag-NP removal capacity at equilibrium; k1, k2-reaction rate constants).
Pseudo First-Order (Lagergren)Pseudo Second-Order (Ho and Mckay)
k1·10−2 [1/min]qe [mg/g]R2k2·10−2 [g/mg·min]qe [mg/g]R2
BV2.145.20.690.4488.90.99
BP1.941.20.510.2475.20.99
BT1.530.30.840.1072.50.98
Table
Table 3. Isotherms parameters of Ag-NP adsorption on biochars (KF, KL, 1/n: constants; Qm: maximum amount of adsorbate in the monomolecular layer).
Table 3. Isotherms parameters of Ag-NP adsorption on biochars (KF, KL, 1/n: constants; Qm: maximum amount of adsorbate in the monomolecular layer).
Freundlich IsothermLangmuir Isotherm
KF [mg/g(L/mg]1/n1/nR2KL [L/mg]Qm [mg/g]R2
BV0.460.410.975.98·10−3114.940.90
BP1.69·10−60.720.982.74·10−512.970.69
BT6.01·10−90.920.983.39·10−74.60.95

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tomczyk, A.; Szewczuk-Karpisz, K.; Sokołowska, Z.; Kercheva, M.; Dimitrov, E. Purification of Aqueous Media by Biochars: Feedstock Type Effect on Silver Nanoparticles Removal. Molecules 2020, 25, 2930. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25122930

AMA Style

Tomczyk A, Szewczuk-Karpisz K, Sokołowska Z, Kercheva M, Dimitrov E. Purification of Aqueous Media by Biochars: Feedstock Type Effect on Silver Nanoparticles Removal. Molecules. 2020; 25(12):2930. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25122930

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tomczyk, Agnieszka, Katarzyna Szewczuk-Karpisz, Zofia Sokołowska, Milena Kercheva, and Emil Dimitrov. 2020. "Purification of Aqueous Media by Biochars: Feedstock Type Effect on Silver Nanoparticles Removal" Molecules 25, no. 12: 2930. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25122930

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop