Next Article in Journal
Wavelength Selection for NIR Spectroscopy Based on the Binary Dragonfly Algorithm
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis of New Proteomimetic Quinazolinone Alkaloids and Evaluation of Their Neuroprotective and Antitumor Effects
Previous Article in Journal
Yeast Smell Like What They Eat: Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds of Malassezia furfur in Growth Media Supplemented with Different Lipids
Previous Article in Special Issue
Probing the Structural Determinants of Amino Acid Recognition: X-Ray Studies of Crystalline Ditopic Host-Guest Complexes of the Positively Charged Amino Acids, Arg, Lys, and His with a Cavitand Molecule
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Enantioselective Potentiometric Sensor for 2-Amino-1-Butanol Based on Chiral Porous Organic Cage CC3-R

1
Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemistry for Natural Resource, Ministry of Education, School of Chemical Science and Technology, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China
2
Department of Chemistry, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2019, 24(3), 420; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24030420
Submission received: 23 December 2018 / Revised: 19 January 2019 / Accepted: 23 January 2019 / Published: 24 January 2019

Abstract

:
Porous organic cages (POCs) have attracted extensive attention due to their unique structures and tremendous application potential in numerous areas. In this study, an enantioselective potentiometric sensor composed of a polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane electrode modified with CC3-R POC material was used for the recognition of enantiomers of 2-amino-1-butanol. After optimisation, the developed sensor exhibited enantioselectivity toward S-2-amino-1-butanol ( log K S , R P o t = −0.98) with acceptable sensitivity, and a near-Nernstian response of 25.8 ± 0.3 mV/decade within a pH range of 6.0–9.0.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Chirality is a general phenomenon and an important characteristic in naturally occurring molecules. For instance, most amino acids are levorotatory and sugars are dextrorotatory in biological systems. Consequently, chiral discrimination has attracted tremendous attention on account of its significance in pharmaceutical, biomedicine and chemical fields. Currently, chiral discrimination can be precisely achieved in many ways including gas chromatography (GC), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and high-performance capillary electrophoresis (HPCE). Although these methods have different advantages in terms of sensitivity or applicability, they suffer similar drawbacks including complicated operation and the need for expensive equipment. By contrast, ion-selective electrodes are simple, rapid and affordable, and have been widely applied to the enantioselective recognition and detection of chiral compounds in recent years [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9].
As versatile functional material platforms, porous organic cages (POCs) have attracted much attention [10,11,12,13], and have been widely applied in various areas such as gas-selective adsorption and separation [14,15,16,17], molecular recognition [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27], catalysis [28], water treatment [29] and sensing [30]. As shown in Figure 1, the R-type chiral POC CC3-R has an interlinked chiral pore channel structure with adjacent tetrahedral cages packed together [31,32]. The chiral pore channel structures and cyclohexyl, imino and phenyl groups of cage molecules constitute a chiral microenvironment comprising a variety of enantioselective factors including dispersion forces, dipolar interactions and hydrogen bonds [33]. These properties combine to make CC3-R an excellent chiral selector for use in chiral recognition methods. Recently, a CC3-R-modified GC stationary phase was developed for the separation of racemates, and exhibited excellent enantioselectivity [34].
2-Amino-1-butanol (Figure 2) is generally used as an intermediate in the synthesis of pharmaceuticals such as the bacteriostatic antituberculosis agent (S,S)-ethambutol [35,36,37,38]. In the present work, CC3-R was applied as a chiral selector in PVC membrane electrodes, resulting in impressive enantioselectivity for S-2-amino-1-butanol. Factors influencing the enantioselectivity of the CC3-R-based membrane electrode, such as the content of CC3-R, the category of plasticiser and the pH value of analyte solutions, were systematically investigated.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Characterisation of the Synthesised CC3-R

The synthesised CC3-R crystals were characterised by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR), Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) and elemental analysis. As can be seen in Figure 3, the PXRD pattern of synthesised CC3-R crystals was consistent with the Singlecrystal simulation. Furthermore, CC3-R retained the same crystallinity and structure whether recrystallised from tetrahydrofuran or rinsed with water for 48 h, demonstrating excellent stability as chiral selector in the membrane electrode.
Elemental analysis was performed on CC3-R (C72H85N12); calculated = C 77.31, H 7.66, N 15.03; detected = C 77.08, H 7.76, N 14.88. 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ = 8.18 (s, 12H, -CH=N-), 7.92 (s, 12H, -Ar-H), 3.36 (m, 12H, -CHN-), 1.86–1.54 (m, 48H, -CH2-) ppm. 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ = 159.15, 136.64, 129.53, 74.65, 33.02, 24.39 ppm. All characterisation data confirmed that CC3-R was successfully synthesised.

2.2. Optimisation of Membrane Components

The nature and amount of chiral selector and plasticiser contained in the membrane can strongly influence the selectivity and sensitivity of the membrane electrode. Consequently, the potential response characteristics of multiple electrodes with different quantities of CC3-R and three types of plasticiser (o-NPOE, DOS and DBP) were evaluated.
Figure 4 shows the potential response characteristics of membrane electrodes with different CC3-R mass percentages. The performance of the membrane electrode improved with increasing CC3-R content, and the best enantioselectivity toward S-2-amino-1-butanol was achieved with 3% CC3-R (by weight). However, the enantioselectivity and sensitivity decreased slightly when the amount of CC3-R reached 4%. It is possible that the PVC membrane becomes saturated, hence the number of recognition sites does not increase proportionately with the chiral selector. Moreover, excess CC3-R could affect the ion-exchange capacity of the membrane electrode.
The influence of the type of plasticiser is shown in Figure 5. DOS and DBP were clearly inferior to o-NPOE in terms of detection limit and enantioselectivity coefficient for S-2-amino-1-butanol.

2.3. Effect of pH on the Electrode

In order to investigate the effect of pH on the response performance of the optimised membrane electrode, the potential response value of the 2-amino-1-butanol solution (1.0 × 10−3 mol·L−1) was measured at different pH values (pH 2.0–12.0). As shown in Figure 6, the potential response value was stable within a pH range of 5.0–9.0. Furthermore, a large difference between the two enantiomers was observed at pH 9.0. Therefore, pH 9.0 was adopted for measurements using the optimised membrane electrode.

2.4. Enantioselectivity Coefficient of the Electrode

Figure 4 shows log K S , R P o t values for membrane electrodes of varying composition. The optimised membrane electrode containing 3 wt% CC3-R displayed impressive enantioselectivity toward S-2-amino-1-butanol over R-2-amino-1-butanol ( log K S , R P o t = −0.98). By comparison, the CC3-S (3 wt%) modified membrane electrode showed similar enantioselectivity toward R-2-amino-1-butanol ( log K S , R P o t = −0.94).
Furthermore, the log K S , int P o t value was used to evaluate the enantioselectivity of the optimised electrode in the presence of interfering ions with a similar configuration to 2-amino-1-butanol [39]. Specifically, the potential values of R/S-2-amino-3-phenyl-1-propanol, R/S-2-amino-3-methyl-1-butanol and R/S-3-amino-1,2-propanediol (0.1 mol·L−1) were measured, and log K S , int P o t values are shown in Table 1.
As shown in Table 1, the membrane electrode exhibited comparable responses to other alkamines with similar configurations to 2-amino-1-butanol. Steric hindrance caused by additional organic groups of other alkamines could impair the recognition performance during ion exchange. The electrode displayed slight enantioselective recognition of enantiomers of 2-amino-3-methyl-1-butanol, which have the most similar configuration. However, 2-amino-3-methyl-1-butanol yielded similar potential response values, and caused significant interference.

2.5. Recognition of Mixing Samples

To further explore the enantioselectivity of the developed membrane electrode, a mixing sample test was conducted using different molar ratios of S- and R-enantiomers of 2-amino-1-butanol (Figure 7). The results showed that the potential response values of the mixing solution increased with increasing proportion of S-2-amino-1-butanol, revealing a clear positive linear correlation between the proportion of S-2-amino-1-butanol and potential response values of mixing solutions (0.1 mol·L−1). These results demonstrate the selective recognition of S-2-amino-1-butanol in the presence of R-2-amino-1-butanol.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

Enantiomers of 2-amino-1-butanol, 2-amino-3-phenyl-1-propanol, 2-amino-3-methyl-1-butanol, and 3-amino-1,2-propanediol were obtained from Aladdin (Shanghai, China). (R,R)-1,2-Diaminocyclohexane and 1,3,5-triformylbenzene were purchased from Acros (Geel, Belgium). o-Nitrophenyl Octyl Ether (o-NPOE), dioctyl sebacate (DOS) and dibutyl phthalate (DBP) were obtained from TCI (Tokyo, Japan). Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) powder and trifluoroacetic acid were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). All other reagents were of analytical grade. Deionised water was used to prepare and dilute all buffer and analyte solutions.

3.2. Synthesis of CC3-R

CC3-R was synthesised using a previously reported method [29]. Briefly, 20 mL dichloromethane was added dropwise onto 1.0 g 1,3,5-triformylbenzene in a two-necked flask without stirring at room temperature, and 20 μL trifluoroacetic acid was added as a catalyst. Within minutes, 20 mL dichloromethane containing 1.0 g (R,R)-1,2-diaminocyclohexane was dripped slowly into the mixture. After reaction for 72 h at room temperature, white crystals were present on the wall of the flask, which were filtered and rinsed with ethanol/dichloromethane (95:5 v/v).

3.3. Preparation of Enantioselective Membrane Electrodes

To prepare the PVC membranes, PVC powder, plasticiser (o-NPOE), and CC3-R were added to 3 mL tetrahydrofuran and stirred to form a transparent solution [40]. This was poured onto a glass sheet and volatilised for 24 h to form a semitransparent film ~0.5 mm thick. The obtained film was incised into an appropriately sized disc and assembled using a PVC tube, which was subsequently filled with 0.1 mol·L−1 KCl as an internal reference solution. A silver chloride electrode was applied as an internal reference electrode, and a saturated calomel electrode was utilised as a reference electrode. For comparison, a CC3-S-modified membrane electrode was prepared in the same way. The overall strategy for enantioselective potentiometric sensor fabrication is depicted in Scheme 1.

3.4. Potentiometric Measurement

The direct potentiometric method was applied to measure the potential value of each S/R-2-amino-1-butanol solution at different molar concentrations (1.0 × 10−6 to 1.0 × 10−1 mol·L−1) and mixing solution with different molar ratios (S/R = 1:0, 2:1, 1:1, 1:2, and 0:1). A Model PHS-3C pH meter (Leici, Shanghai, China) was used for potentiometric and pH measurements, and all potentiometric measurements were performed during stirring at room temperature. Before measurement, membrane electrodes were soaked in S-2-amino-1-butanol solution (1.0 × 10−3 mol·L−1) for 24 h.
A revised separate solution method was used to calculate the enantioselectivity coefficient ( log K S , R P o t ) with the following formula:
log K S , R P o t = E R E S D
where ER and ES are the potentials of 0.1 mol·L−1 R- and S-2-amino-1-butanol solutions, respectively, and D is the slope of the response curve of S-2-amino-1-butanol.

4. Conclusions

The chiral porous organic cage CC3-R proved to be a useful chiral selector for the modification of PVC membrane electrodes to generate enantioselective potentiometric sensors. The optimised membrane electrode containing 3 wt% CC3-R exhibited enantiomeric recognition toward S-2-amino-1-butanol over R-2-amino-1-butanol ( log K S , R P o t = −0.98) with acceptable sensitivity, and a near-Nernst response of 25.8 ± 0.3 mV/decade toward S-2-amino-1-butanol at pH 9.0.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.-E.C. and L.-M.Y.; Methodology, A.-H.D.; Writing—Original draft preparation, B.-J.W.; Writing—Review and editing, J.-H.Z. and S.-M.X.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 21665028, No. 21265026, and No. 21465025).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Duan, A.H.; Wang, B.J.; Xie, S.M.; Zhang, J.H.; Yuan, L.M. A chiral, porous, organic cage-based, enantioselective potentiometric sensor for 2-aminobutanol. Chirality 2017, 29, 172–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Xu, L.; Yang, Y.Y.; Wang, Y.Q.; Gao, J.Z. Chiral salen Mn(III) complex-based enantioselective potentiometric sensor for L-mandelic acid. Anal. Chim. Acta 2009, 653, 217–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chen, Y.; Chen, L.; Bi, R.L.; Xu, L.; Liu, Y. A potentiometric chiral sensor for l-Phenylalanine based on crosslinked polymethylacrylic acid–polycarbazole hybrid molecularly imprinted polymer. Anal. Chim. Acta 2012, 754, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Stefan-van, S.R.I.; Nhlapo, N.S.; Staden-van, J.F.; Aboul-Enein, H.Y. Enantioanalysis of (-)butaclamol using vancomycin and teicoplanin as chiral Selectors. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 2010, 13, 690–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhou, Y.X.; Nagaoka, T.; Yu, B.; Levon, K. Chiral ligand exchange potentiometric aspartic acid sensors with polysiloxane films containing a chiral ligand N-carbobenzoxy-aspartic acid. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 1888–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Stefan-van, S.R.I.; Staden-van, J.F.; Aboul-Enein, H.Y. Macrocyclic antibiotics as chiral selectors in the design of enantioselective, potentiometric membrane electrodes for the determination of S-flurbiprofen. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2009, 394, 821–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yin, X.L.; Ding, J.J.; Zhang, S.; Kong, J.L. Enantioselective sensing of chiral amino acids by potentiometric sensors based on optical active polyaniline films. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2006, 21, 2184–2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ozoemena, K.I.; Stefan, R.I. Enantioselective potentiometric membrane electrodes based on α-, β- and γ-cyclodextrins as chiral selectors for the assay of l-proline. Talanta 2005, 66, 501–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rat’ko, A.A.; Stefan, R.I.; Staden-van, J.F.; Aboul-Enein, H.Y. Macrocyclic antibiotics as chiral selectors in the design of enantioselective, potentiometric membrane electrodes for the determination of L- and D-enantiomers of methotrexate. Talanta 2004, 64, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hui, M.D.; Yang, Y.H.; Li, B.J.; Pan, F.; Zhu, G.Z.; Zeller, M.; Yuan, D.Q.; Wang, C. Targeted synthesis of a large tria zine-based [4+6] organic molecular cage: Structure, porosity and gas separation. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 1976–1979. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang, G.; Presly, O.; White, F.; Oppel, I.M.; Mastalerz, M. A permanent mesoporous organic cage with an exceptionally high surface area. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1516–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhang, G.; Mastalerz, M. Organic cage compounds—From shape-persistency to function. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 1934–1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Liu, M.; Little, M.A.; Jelfs, K.E.; Jones, J.T.A.; Schmidtmann, M.; Chong, S.Y.; Hasell, T.; Cooper, A.I. Acid- and base-stable porous organic cages: Shape persistence and pH stability via post-synthetic “tying” of a flexible amine cage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 7583–7586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hasell, T.; Miklitz, M.; Stephenson, A.; Little, M.A.; Chong, S.Y.; Clowes, R.; Chen, L.J.; Holden, D.; Tribello, G.A.; Jelfs, K.E.; et al. Porous organic cages for sulfur hexafluoride separation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 1653–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Mastalerz, M.; Schneider, M.W.; Oppel, I.M.; Presly, O. A salicylbisimine cage compound with high surface area and selective CO2/CH4 adsorption. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 1046–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Jin, Y.H.; Voss, B.A.; Jin, A.; Long, H.; Noble, R.D.; Zhang, W. Highly CO2-selective organic molecular cages: What determines the CO2 selectivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 6650–6658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mitra, T.; Wu, X.F.; Clowes, R.; Jones, J.T.A.; Jelfs, K.E.; Adams, D.J.; Trewin, A.; Bacsa, J.; Steiner, A.; Cooper, A.I. A soft porous organic cage crystal with complex gas sorption behavior. Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 10235–10240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zhang, J.H.; Xie, S.M.; Wang, B.J.; He, P.G.; Yuan, L.M. A homochiral porous organic cage with large cavity and pore windows for the efficient gas chromatography separation of enantiomers and positional isomers. J. Sep. Sci. 2018, 41, 1385–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, J.H.; Zhu, P.J.; Xie, S.M.; Zi, M.; Yuan, L.M. Homochiral porous organic cage used as stationary phase for open tubular capillary electrochromatography. Anal. Chim. Acta 2018, 999, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Song, Q.L.; Jiang, S.; Hasell, T.; Liu, M.; Sun, S.J.; Cheetham, A.K.; Sivaniah, E.; Cooper, A.I. Porous organic cage thin films and molecular-sieving membranes. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 2629–2637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xie, S.M.; Zhang, J.H.; Fu, N.; Wang, B.J.; Hu, C.; Yuan, L.M. Application of homochiral alkylated organic cages as chiral stationary phases for molecular separations by capillary gas chromatography. Molecules 2016, 21, 1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Xie, S.M.; Zhang, J.H.; Fu, N.; Wang, B.J.; Chen, L.; Yuan, L.M. A chiral porous organic cage for molecular recognition using gas chromatography. Anal. Chim. Acta 2016, 903, 156–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhang, J.H.; Xie, S.M.; Wang, B.J.; He, P.G.; Yuan, L.M. Highly selective separation of enantiomers using a chiral porous organic cage. J. Chromatogr. A 2015, 1426, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kewley, A.; Stephenson, A.; Chen, L.J.; Briggs, M.E.; Hasell, T.; Cooper, A.I. Porous organic cages for gas chromatography separations. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 3207–3210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mitra, T.; Jelfs, K.E.; Schmidtmann, M.; Ahmed, A.; Chong, S.Y.; Adams, D.J.; Cooper, A.I. Molecular shape sorting using molecular organic cages. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5, 276–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Chen, L.J.; Reiss, P.S.; Chong, S.Y.; Holden, D.; Jelfs, K.E.; Hasell, T.; Little, M.A.; Kewley, A.; Briggs, M.E.; Stephenson, A.; et al. Separation of rare gases and chiral molecules by selective binding in porous organic cages. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13, 954–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Xie, S.M.; Yuan, L.M. Recent progress of chiral stationary phases for separation of enantiomers in gas chromatography. J. Sep. Sci. 2017, 40, 124–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, Y.; Xiong, Y.; Ge, J.; Lin, R.; Chen, C.; Peng, Q.; Wang, D.S.; Li, Y.D. Porous organic cage stabilised palladium nanoparticles: Efficient heterogeneous catalysts for carbonylation reaction of aryl halides. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 2796–2799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kong, X.; Jiang, J.W. Amorphous porous organic cage membranes for water desalination. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 1732–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Brutschy, M.; Schneider, M.W.; Mastalerz, M.; Waldvogel, S.R. Porous organic cage compounds as highly potent affinity materials for sensing by quartz crystal microbalances. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 6049–6052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bojdys, M.J.; Briggs, M.; Jones, J.T.A.; Adams, D.J.; Chong, S.Y.; Schmidtmann, M.; Cooper, A.I. Supramolecular engineering of intrinsic and extrinsic porosity in covalent organic cages. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 16566–16571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Tozawa, T.; Jones, J.T.A.; Swamy, S.I.; Jiang, S.; Adams, D.J.; Shakespeare, S.; Clowes, R.; Bradshaw, D.; Hasell, T.; Chong, S.Y.; et al. Porous organic cages. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 973–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yamamoto, C.; Yashima, E.; Okamoto, Y. Structural analysis of amylose tris(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) by NMR relevant to its chiral recognition mechanism in HPLC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 12583–12589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhang, J.H.; Xie, S.M.; Chen, L.; Wang, B.J.; He, P.G.; Yuan, L.M. Homochiral porous organic cage with high selectivity for the separation of racemates in gas chromatography. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 7817–7824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Goncalves, R.S.B.; Da-Silva, E.T.; De-Souza, M.V.N. An environmentally friendly, scalable and highly efficient synthesis of (S,S)-Ethambutol, a first line drug against tuberculosis. Lett. Org. Chem. 2015, 12, 478–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dobrikov, G.M.; Valcheva, V.; Stoilova-Disheva, M.; Momekov, G.; Tzvetkova, P.; Chimov, A.; Dimitrov, V. Synthesis and in vitro antimycobacterial activity of compounds derived from (R)- and (S)-2-amino-1-butanol—The crucial role of the configuration. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 48, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Dobrikov, G.M.; Valcheva, V.; Nikolova, Y.; Ugrinova, I.; Pasheva, E.; Dimitrov, V. Efficient synthesis of new (R)-2-amino-1-butanol derived ureas, thioureas and acylthioureas and in vitro evaluation of their antimycobacterial activity. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 63, 468–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dobrikov, G.M.; Valcheva, V.; Nikolova, Y.; Ugrinova, I.; Pasheva, E.; Dimitrov, V. Enantiopure antituberculosis candidates synthesized from (-)-fenchone. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 77, 243–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Horváth, V.; Takécs, T.; Horvai, G.; Huszthy, P.; Bradshaw, J.S.; Izatt, R.M. Enantiomer-Selectivity of ion-selective electrodes based on a chiral crown-ether ionophore. Anal. Lett. 1997, 9, 1591–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Moody, G.J.; Oke, R.B.; Thomas, J.D.R. A calcium-sensitive electrode based on a liquid ion exchanger in a poly(vinyl chloride) matrix. Analyst 1970, 95, 910–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Not available.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the structure of CC3-R.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the structure of CC3-R.
Molecules 24 00420 g001
Figure 2. Molecular structure of 2-amino-1-butanol.
Figure 2. Molecular structure of 2-amino-1-butanol.
Molecules 24 00420 g002
Figure 3. PXRD patterns of CC3-R: (a) Singlecrystal simulation, (b) synthesised, (c) rinsed with water for 48 h, (d) recrystallised from tetrahydrofuran.
Figure 3. PXRD patterns of CC3-R: (a) Singlecrystal simulation, (b) synthesised, (c) rinsed with water for 48 h, (d) recrystallised from tetrahydrofuran.
Molecules 24 00420 g003
Figure 4. Potential response characteristics of membrane electrodes with different CC3-R contents.
Figure 4. Potential response characteristics of membrane electrodes with different CC3-R contents.
Molecules 24 00420 g004
Figure 5. Potential response characteristics of membrane electrodes with different types of plasticiser.
Figure 5. Potential response characteristics of membrane electrodes with different types of plasticiser.
Molecules 24 00420 g005
Figure 6. The influence of pH on the response performance of the membrane electrode to S/R-2-amino-1-butanol.
Figure 6. The influence of pH on the response performance of the membrane electrode to S/R-2-amino-1-butanol.
Molecules 24 00420 g006
Figure 7. (a) Potential responses of S- and R-enantiomers of 2-amino-1-butanol mixing solutions. (b) Positive linear correlation between the proportion of S-2-amino-1-butanol and potential response values of mixing solutions (0.1 mol·L−1).
Figure 7. (a) Potential responses of S- and R-enantiomers of 2-amino-1-butanol mixing solutions. (b) Positive linear correlation between the proportion of S-2-amino-1-butanol and potential response values of mixing solutions (0.1 mol·L−1).
Molecules 24 00420 g007
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of enantioselective potentiometric sensor fabrication.
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of enantioselective potentiometric sensor fabrication.
Molecules 24 00420 sch001
Table 1. Log K S , int P o t values of ions potentially interfering with S-2-amino-1-butanol.
Table 1. Log K S , int P o t values of ions potentially interfering with S-2-amino-1-butanol.
Interference Ion Log K S , int P o t
R-2-Amino-1-butanol−0.98
S-2-Amino-3-phenyl-1-propanol−0.59
R-2-Amino-3-phenyl-1-propanol−0.59
S-2-Amino-3-methyl-1-butanol0.31
R-2-Amino-3-methyl-1-butanol0.26
S-3-Amino-1,2-propanediol−0.41
R-3-Amino-1,2-propanediol−0.41

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, B.-J.; Duan, A.-H.; Zhang, J.-H.; Xie, S.-M.; Cao, Q.-E.; Yuan, L.-M. An Enantioselective Potentiometric Sensor for 2-Amino-1-Butanol Based on Chiral Porous Organic Cage CC3-R. Molecules 2019, 24, 420. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24030420

AMA Style

Wang B-J, Duan A-H, Zhang J-H, Xie S-M, Cao Q-E, Yuan L-M. An Enantioselective Potentiometric Sensor for 2-Amino-1-Butanol Based on Chiral Porous Organic Cage CC3-R. Molecules. 2019; 24(3):420. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24030420

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Bang-Jin, Ai-Hong Duan, Jun-Hui Zhang, Sheng-Ming Xie, Qiu-E Cao, and Li-Ming Yuan. 2019. "An Enantioselective Potentiometric Sensor for 2-Amino-1-Butanol Based on Chiral Porous Organic Cage CC3-R" Molecules 24, no. 3: 420. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24030420

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop