Next Article in Journal
Composition Analysis by UPLC-PDA-ESI (−)-HRMS and Antioxidant Activity Using Saccharomyces cerevisiae Model of Herbal Teas and Green Teas from Hainan
Previous Article in Journal
In Vitro and in Vivo Imaging of Nitroxyl with Copper Fluorescent Probe in Living Cells and Zebrafish
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 23
Issue 10
10.3390/molecules23102552
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Novel Non-Enzymatic Electrochemical Hydrogen Peroxide Sensor Based on a Metal-Organic Framework/Carbon Nanofiber Composite

by
Yijun Fu
1,2,
Jiamu Dai
1,2,
Yan Ge
1,2,
Yu Zhang
1,2,
Huizhen Ke
3,* and
Wei Zhang
1,2,*
1
College of Textile and Clothing, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China
2
National & Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Technical Fiber Composites for Safety and Protection, Nantong 226019, China
3
Fujian Key Laboratory of Novel Functional Textile Fibers and Materials, Minjiang University, Fuzhou 350108, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2018, 23(10), 2552; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23102552
Submission received: 31 August 2018 / Revised: 22 September 2018 / Accepted: 2 October 2018 / Published: 6 October 2018
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A co-based porous metal-organic framework (MOF) of zeolitic imidazolate framework-67 (ZIF-67) and carbon nanofibers (CNFs) was utilized to prepare a ZIF-67/CNFs composite via a one-pot synthesis method. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) were employed to investigate the morphology, structure, and composition of the resulting composite. A novel high-performance non-enzymatic electrochemical sensor was constructed based on the ZIF-67/CNFs composite. The ZIF-67/CNFs based sensor exhibited enhanced electrocatalytic activity towards H2O2 compared to a pure ZIF-67-based sensor, due to the synergistic effects of ZIF-67 and CNFs. Meanwhile, chronoamperometry was utilized to explore the detection performance of the sensor. Results showed the sensor displayed high-efficiency electrocatalysis towards H2O2 with a detection limit of 0.62 μM (S/N = 3), a sensitivity of 323 µA mM−1 cm−2, a linear range from 0.0025 to 0.19 mM, as well as satisfactory selectivity and long-term stability. Furthermore, the sensor demonstrated its application potential in the detection of H2O2 in food.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), as an important industrial chemical, has been widely applied in various fields, including food production, medicine manufacture, clinic treatment, etc [1,2,3]. The detection of H2O2 in food is of great importance because it participates in various cellular metabolism pathways of the human body and an abnormal level of H2O2 may lead to severe diseases such as cardiovascular disorders, Alzheimer’s disease and even cancer [4,5,6]. Therefore, the development of fast and accurate methods for H2O2 detection has become a research hotspot. There are various kinds of methods for monitoring H2O2, such as chemiluminescence, titrimetry, electrochemistry, spectrometry and high performance liquid chromatography [7,8,9,10,11]. Among these methods, the electrochemical technique using natural enzymes is becoming increasingly popular due to its intrinsic advantages including simple operation, low cost, good selectivity, and high sensitivity [12,13]. Nevertheless, the performance of enzyme-based electrochemical sensors is mainly dependent on the enzyme activity, which is highly vulnerable to environmental factors like pH, temperature, etc [14]. Thus, novel non-biological materials have been exploited instead of enzymes in electrochemical sensors for H2O2 detection [10,12,13,15].
Metal organic frameworks (MOFs), which are novel three dimensional organic-inorganic hybrids self-assembled by metal ions and organic ligands, have seen explosive growth in a variety of application fields during the past decades [16]. Generally, MOFs possess various topologies, and their morphology or constitution can be adjusted through the appropriate selection of metal ions, ligands, or synthesis methods [17]. These characteristics enable MOFs to be applied in gas storage, drug delivery, separation, catalysis, sensing, etc [18,19,20,21,22]. In this work, a Co-based porous MOF [Co(mIM)2]n (denoted as ZIF-67, mIM = 2-methylimidazole) was selected as the modification material of an electrochemical sensor due to the favorable electrocatalytic property of Co2+ inside ZIF-67 towards H2O2 [23]. The crystal structure of ZIF-67 is shown in Scheme 1. The largest cage is shown with CoN4 in pink polyhedra, and the links in ball-and-stick presentation. The yellow ball indicates space in the cage. H atoms are omitted for clarity (C, gray; N, blue) [24].
Though the ZIF-67 exhibits favorable electrocatalytic ability towards H2O2, its poor conductivity restricts its application in electrochemical H2O2 sensors. To solve this problem, some researchers synthesized MOFs/carbon nanomaterials composites, e.g., MOF/reduced graphene oxide (MOF/rGO) composite, to improve the conductivity of MOF, and it was successfully applied in the high-efficiency monitoring of H2O2 [16,17,25]. Among all carbon materials, carbon nanofibers (CNFs) have attracted a lot of attention because they are easily synthesized and possess many more edge sites compared with carbon nanotubes (CNTs). It is widely accepted that CNFs exhibit outstanding conductivity, high porosity, huge specific surface, as well as excellent mechanical strength. Therefore, CNFs are good candidate for the development of electrochemical sensors or biosensors [26].
In this work, ZIF-67 and CNFs were jointly selected to synthesize a MOF/CNFs composite, namely ZIF-67/CNFs, which was further employed to construct a novel non-enzymatic electrochemical sensor. Afterwards, a series of electrochemical characterizations were carried out to investigate the electrochemical properties of ZIF-67/CNFs composite. In addition, the selectivity, stability, and practical application of ZIF-67/CNFs based electrochemical sensor were also studied to evaluate its potential application in H2O2 detection.

2. Results and Discussions

2.1. Morphology, Chemical Component, and EIS Analysis

Figure 1 shows the SEM images of CNFs, ZIF-67 nanocrystals, and ZIF-67/CNFs composite. Since CNFs were ground before the synthesis procedure, numerous short fibers are randomly distributed in Figure 1a. It can be observed that the surfaces of fibers were smooth, with no impurities on them. The diameter of the CNFs ranged from 213 nm to 524 nm, with an average diameter of 286 nm. It can be seen from Figure 1b that the ZIF-67 exhibited a dispersed rhombic dodecahedral nanocrystal morphology, which was in accordance with another report [27]. Moreover, the rhombic facet of ZIF-67 was well-defined and its edge was clearly visible, indicating the perfect crystalline structure of the synthesized ZIF-67 nanocrystals. The size of ZIF-67 nanocrystals was from 317 nm to 1.2 μm, with a mean particle size of 706 nm. Figure 1c presents the morphology of the ZIF-67/CNFs composite. It can be clearly seen that the ZIF-67 nanocrystals and CNFs were evenly mixed together, with some ZIF-67 nanocrystals attached on the surfaces of CNFs. This may be ascribed to the attractive forces between CNFs and ZIF-67 nanocrystals. Herein, the CNFs play the role of a “molecular wire” which could accelerate the electron transfer rate between ZIF-67 and electrode surface, leading to an improved electrocatalytic activity of ZIF-67/CNFs composite.
Energy-dispersive spectroscopic (EDS) mapping was conducted to investigate the distribution of ZIF-67 nanocrystals in the ZIF-67/CNFs composite. As illustrated in Figure 2, it was apparent that the elements of C, O, N and Co were uniformly and densely dispersed in the ZIF-67/CNFs composite. Meanwhile, the existence of N and Co elements demonstrated that the ZIF-67 nanocrystals were successfully synthesized and introduced in the composite. In addition, considering the N and Co elements did not exist in CNFs, and these two elements were evenly dispersed in the EDS mapping picture, this suggested that the ZIF-67 nanocrystals were equally distributed in the ZIF-67/CNFs composite rather than aggregated.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) characterization was further employed to study the chemical components of ZIF-67/CNFs. Figure 3 shows the XRD patterns of CNFs, synthesized ZIF-67, and ZIF-67/CNFs composite. It can be clearly seen from Figure 3 that the CNFs displayed an apparent and wide diffraction peak at around 25.6°, which corresponded to the (002) crystalline plane of carbon material [28]. For the synthesized pure ZIF-67, it showed a pattern coincident with the simulated ZIF-67 one. Sharp peaks were clearly observed at the diffraction peaks of 7.3°, 12.4°, and 17.7°, which were assigned to the (110), (211), and (222) planes of ZIF-67 crystals, respectively [29]. Notably, the XRD pattern of ZIF-67/CNFs composite displayed the diffraction peaks of both CNFs and ZIF-67, indicating the successful synthesis of ZIF-67/CNFs composite.
Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is an efficient method to explore the interface resistance of a modified electrode. In order to evaluate the potential application of ZIF-67/CNFs as an efficient electrocatalyst, it is essential to investigate the electron transfer resistance (Ret) of the ZIF-67/CNFs modified electrode. Figure 4 compares the Nyquist plots of different modified electrodes. It is well known that the semicircle diameter of the Nyquist plots corresponds to the value of Ret, and the Ret controls the electron transfer kinetics of the redox electrochemical probe at the electrode interface. As shown in Figure 4, the Ret value of bare GCE was 149 Ω, while the Ret value of ZIF-67/GCE was as high as 1206 Ω. However, the Ret value of ZIF-67/CNFs/GCE decreased to 876 Ω after the addition of CNFs. This indicates that the involvement of CNFs could significantly reduce the interface resistance of the modified electrode, leading to an improved conductivity.

2.2. Electrocatalytic Activity for H2O2 Reduction

Figure 5a shows the cyclic voltammograms (CVs) of bare GCE, CNFs/GCE, ZIF-67/GCE, and ZIF-67/CNFs/GCE in 0.1 M NaOH solution containing 25 μM H2O2. The peaks at −0.6 V were ascribed to the reduction reaction of H2O2. Apparently, CNFs/GCE displayed higher reduction peak current (44.8 μA) than bare GCE (24.3 μA), indicating the good electrocatalytic activity of CNFs. As for ZIF-67/GCE, it showed a much larger reduction peak current (81.5 μA) than that of CNFs/GCE, demonstrating the better electrocatalytic activity of ZIF-67 than CNFs. Interestingly, the reduction peak current of ZIF-67/CNFs/GCE was increased again by 9.1 μA in contrast with that of ZIF-67/GCE. The reason of this phenomenon can be ascribed as following: on one hand, the conductivity of the ZIF-67/CNFs composite was enhanced by CNFs; on the other hand, ZIF-67 and CNFs performed a synergistic catalysis role in the whole electrochemical reaction.
Figure 5b displays CVs of the ZIF-67/CNFs/GCE in 0.1 M NaOH solution at different scan rates. As can be seen from the insert of Figure 5b, the anodic and cathodic peak currents increased linearly as the scan rate increased from 100 to 350 mV s−1, suggesting a surface controlled electrochemical redox process, which indicated that the ZIF-67/CNFs composites were well immobilized on the electrode surface.
Figure 5c shows CVs of the ZIF-67/CNFs/GCE in 0.1 M NaOH solution with the presence of 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 μM of H2O2. As observed, the cathodic peak current values increased linearly with the concentration of added H2O2. Moreover, the calibration curve (shown in Figure 5d) also demonstrated the favorable linear relation between cathodic peak current value and H2O2 concentration. This result revealed that the ZIF-67/CNFs/GCE could find potential application as an electrochemical sensor.
The possible reaction mechanism is illustrated in Scheme 2 and the reaction path for ZIF-67 catalyst towards H2O2 could be expressed as following equations:
ZIF-67-Co2+ + H2O2 → ZIF-67-Co3+ + H2O + O2
ZIF-67-Co3+ + e− → ZIF-67-Co2+
At the beginning of electrochemical reaction, H2O2 was adsorbed in the pores of ZIF-67-Co2+. As the reaction continued, the absorbed H2O2 was reduced into H2O and O2, along with the oxidization of ZIF-67-Co2+ into ZIF-67-Co3+. Last, ZIF-67-Co3+ achieved an electron from electrode to regenerate ZIF-67-Co2+. The CNFs existing in the composite membrane on electrode surface not only accelerated the electron transfer rate, but also worked together with ZIF-67 to achieve the synergistic catalysis, resulting in an amplified electrochemical signal.

2.3. Amperometric Response to H2O2

The electroanalytical properties of ZIF-67/CNFs/GCE toward H2O2 were evaluated under −0.2 V. Figure 6a displays the chronoamperometric responses of ZIF-67/CNFs/GCE on successive addition of different volume of H2O2 solutions into 0.1 M NaOH solution. It can be seen from Figure 6a, with the successive addition of H2O2, the steady-state current values gradually increased. As shown in Figure 6b, the response current of the ZIF-67/CNFs/GCE showed a linear dependence on H2O2 concentration in the range from 2.5 µM to 190 µM with the linearity regression equation of Δi(µA) = 9.244 + 0.217c (µM) (r2 = 0.986), a sensitivity of 323 µA mM−1 cm−2, and a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.62 µM (S/N = 3). Besides, non-linear fitting was also applied to show that when the concentration of H2O2 was higher than 190 µM, the response current tended to be stable, suggesting a detection limit of the sensor.
The sensing performance of the ZIF-67/CNFs/GCE was next compared with other reported non-enzymatic H2O2 sensors, and the results are summarized in Table 1. The prepared H2O2 sensor showed low detection limit, wide linear range, and high sensitivity, which are mainly attributed to excellent electrocatalytic activity of the ZIF-67/CNFs composite.

2.4. Reproducibility, Repeatability and Stability of the ZIF-67/CNFs/GCE

The ZIF-67/CNFs/GCE showed satisfactory reproducibility, repeatability, and stability. Five electrochemical sensors were independently prepared under the same conditions, and the relative standard deviation (RSD) of the five modified electrodes was 2.7%, indicating the electrochemical had good reproducibility.
The RSD of response currents of 10 successive measurements of the electrochemical sensor towards H2O2 was within 2.0%, indicating satisfactory repeatability of the electrochemical sensor. Figure 7a shows the storage stability of the ZIF-67/CNFs/GCE in 0.1 M NaOH solution. After a week of storage in 0.1 M NaOH solution, the current response of the electrochemical sensor almost kept stable. The current response still retained 92.6% of the initial value through 30 days of storage, demonstrating that the electrochemical sensor based on ZIF-67/CNFs/GCE exhibited good stability.

2.5. Anti-Interference and Real Sample Analysis

In addition, the ZIF-67/CNFs/GCE sensor also displayed good anti-interference performance. As shown in Figure 7b, when adding 1 mM H2O2, the response current apparently changed, while it was barely affected by adding 0.1 mM DA, 0.1 mM AA, and 1.0 mM UA. The favourable anti-interference performance can be attributed to the negative operating potential (−0.2 V) and the protection role of Nafion layer. Thus, the ZIF-67/CNFs/GCE sensor showed a good selectivity to H2O2. To demonstrate the practical application of the sensor, recovery experiments of H2O2 detection was carried out in milk samples, which were bought from a local supermarket, and the results are shown in Table 2. Five parallel experiments were conducted to study the recovery property of H2O2 in milk samples. It can be clearly observed that the recovery were all approach to 100%, and the relative standard deviation (RSD) was only 1.5%. All these data suggested that the H2O2 sensor based on ZIF-67/CNFs/GCE could be applied in analysis of H2O2 existing in beverage and food.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemicals and Reagents

Polyacrylonitrile (PAN, average molecular weight = 82,000) powder, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), methanol, 2-methylimidazole (C4H6N2, mIM), cobalt nitrate hexahydrate (Co(NO3)2·6H2O), potassium ferricyanide (K3[Fe(CN)6]), potassium hexacyanoferrate (K4[Fe(CN)6]·3H2O), NaOH, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), dopamine (DA), ascorbic acid (AA), and urea (UA) were all purchased from the Sinopharm Group Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). All chemicals were of analytical grade and used without further purification. Nafion (5% w/w) was obtained from E. I. Du Pont Company (Wilmington, NC, USA). Besides, 0.1 M NaOH solution was used as a supporting electrolyte. All aqueous solutions were prepared with deionized water (DIW).

3.2. Apparatus

The morphology, elemental analysis, and chemical components of ZIF-67, CNFs, and ZIF-67/CNFs composite were respectively characterized by a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, S4800, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), an energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX, NORAN SYSTEM 7, Thermo Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and a Powder D8 Advance X-ray diffraction (XRD, AXS D8, Bruker, Coventry, UK). Electrochemical experiments were carried out using a CHI 660E electrochemical workstation (CH Instruments, Shanghai, China) at room temperature. The electrochemical measurements were implemented by a three-electrode cell with a GCE (4.0 mm in diameter, 12 mm2 in area, purchased from Gaoss Union Technology Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China), a platinum wire auxiliary electrode and an Ag/AgCl reference electrode (saturated KCl).

3.3. Preparation of Carbon Nanofibers

The carbon nanofibers (CNFs) were prepared by the following method. Firstly, 12 wt % PAN powder, as precursor, was dissolved in DMF solution with 8 h of magnetic stirring to prepare the electrospinning solution. After that, the obtained solution was poured in a syringe for electrospinning with a flow rate of 1 mL/h, a voltage of 16 kV, and a working distance of 20 cm, and respectively. Lastly, the final CNFs were prepared by carbonizing the PAN nanofibers through a high temperature furnace. The whole procedure was carried out in Ar atmosphere and can be summarized as follows: (1) heating up to 280 ℃ with a heating rate of 2 ℃ min−1, maintaining this temperature for 1 h to complete the pre oxidation treatment of nanofibers; (2) heating up to 900 ℃ at the rate of 5 ℃ min−1, keeping this temperature for 2 h to carbonize the nanofibers. The obtained carbon nanofibrous membrane was further ground to powder (short carbon nanofibers) for the following experiments.

3.4. Synthesis of ZIF-67/CNFs Composite

In this study, Co(NO3)2·6H2O and mIM were used as precursors to produce ZIF-67 nanocrystals. First of all, the CNFs and Co(NO3)2·6H2O (with the mass ratio of 1:1) were dispersed in 40 mL of methanol with slight stirring for 1 h at 45 ℃. After that, above solution was added into 40 mL of 2 mol L−1 mIM methanol solution. The solution gradually became purple and was incubated for 24 h at room temperature. The obtained products were gathered, washed for several times with ethanol and collected by centrifugation. For comparison, pure ZIF-67 nanocrystals were prepared by similar procedure except from the addition of CNFs.

3.5. Preparation of Electrochemical Sensors

Considering the optimal response and stability of modified electrode, among control-experiments, the concentration and mass ratio of Nafion and ZIF-67/CNFs were optimized. Ultimately, the electrochemical sensor was prepared by the mixture containing 1 wt % Nafion, and 1 mg mL−1 ZIF-67/CNFs.
The preparation process of the ZIF-67/CNFs modified GCE (ZIF-67/CNFs/GCE) is as follows: Firstly, 1 mg ZIF-67/CNFs composites were added into 1 mL DIW to prepare ZIF-67/CNFs suspension under continuous stirring. Afterward, a mixture containing ZIF-67/CNFs suspension and a certain volume of Nafion (5 wt %) were stirred for 1 h. Lastly, the ZIF-67/CNFs/GCE was prepared by dropping 10 µL of the mixture on the surface of processed GCE, which was polished by alumina followed by rinsing and ultrasonicating with DIW.
For comparison experiments, CNFs-modified GCE (CNFs/GCE) and ZIF-67 modified GCE (ZIF-67/GCE) were respectively prepared through the same methods by keeping the same amount of CNFs, ZIF-67, and ZIF-67/CNFs composite. All the electrodes were immersed in 0.1 M NaOH solution for 20 min to remove the impurities before experiment. For the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) characterization, the CNFs modified GCE, ZIF-67 modified GCE, and ZIF-67/CNFs modified GCE were fabricated by dropping 10 µL 1 mg mL−1 of CNFs, ZIF-67, and ZIF-67/CNFs suspension in DIW without Nafion on the GCE surface, followed by drying in Ar atmosphere.

4. Conclusions

In summary, a ZIF-67/CNFs composite was synthesized by a “one pot” method, and a novel non-enzymatic H2O2 sensor made of ZIF-67/CNFs has been successfully fabricated. The ZIF-67/CNFs/GCE exhibited enhanced electrocatalytic performance towards H2O2 in comparison with ZIF-67/GCE due to the accelerated electron transfer rate by CNFs. Besides, the sensor displayed low detection limit, high sensitivity, as well as satisfactory selectivity and long-term stability. Moreover, the sensor was successfully applied in the detection of H2O2 in milk. This study not only demonstrates the application potential of the ZIF-67/CNFs composite in constructing high-performance non-enzymatic H2O2 sensor, but also provides an idea for improving the electrocatalytic activity of MOF materials.

Author Contributions

Y.F. and Y.Z. conceived the experiments; J.D. and Y.G. carried out the samples preparation and performance tests; Y.F. and J.D. wrote the original draft; H.K. and W.Z. revised the paper.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51803094, 51803095), the Natural Science Research Project of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (17KJB540002), the Nantong Science and Technology Project (MS12016020), the Nantong University Scientific Research Fund (17R19), the Open Project Program of Fujian Key Laboratory of Novel Functional Textile Fibers and Materials, Minjiang University (FKLTFM1702), and the Student Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Project of Jiangsu Province (201710304109X).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liu, W.F.; Zhou, Z.H.; Yin, L.; Zhu, Y.M.; Zhao, J.; Zhu, B.; Zheng, L.B.; Jin, Q.; Wang, L. A novel self-powered bioelectrochemical sensor based on CoMn2O4 nanoparticle modified cathode for sensitive and rapid detection of hydrogen peroxide. Sensor Actuat. B-Chem. 2018, 271, 247–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Singh, S.; Singh, M.; Mitra, K.; Singh, R.; Sen Gupta, S.K.; Tiwari, I.; Ray, B. Electrochemical sensing of hydrogen peroxide using brominated graphene as mimetic catalase. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 258, 1435–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Peng, C.; Zhou, S.Y.; Zhang, X.M.; Zeng, T.Q.; Zhang, W.; Li, H.M.; Liu, X.Y.; Zhao, P. One pot synthesis of nitrogen-doped hollow carbon spheres with improved electrocatalytic properties for sensitive H2O2 sensing in human serum. Sensor Actuat. B-Chem. 2018, 270, 530–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fu, Y.M.; Huang, D.; Li, C.M.; Zou, L.N.; Ye, B.X. Graphene blended with SnO2 and Pd-Pt nanocages for sensitive nonenzymatic electrochemical detection of H2O2 released from living cells. Anal. Chim. Acta 2018, 1014, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Jiang, X.Y.; Wang, H.J.; Yuan, R.; Chai, Y.Q. Functional Three-Dimensional Porous Conductive Polymer Hydrogels for Sensitive Electrochemiluminescence in Situ Detection of H2O2 Released from Live Cells. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 8462–8469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zhou, J.X.; Tang, L.N.; Yang, F.; Liang, F.X.; Wang, H.; Li, Y.T.; Zhang, G.J. MoS2/Pt nanocomposite-functionalized micro-needle for real-time monitoring of hydrogen peroxide release from living cells. Analyst 2017, 142, 4322–4329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zhang, L.S.; Wong, G.T. Optimal conditions and sample storage for the determination of H2O2 in marine waters by the scopoletin-horseradish peroxidase fluorometric method. Talanta 1999, 48, 1031–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gimeno, P.; Bousquet, C.; Lassu, N.; Maggio, A.F.; Civade, C.; Brenier, C.; Lempereur, L. High-performance liquid chromatography method for the determination of hydrogen peroxide present or released in teeth bleaching kits and hair cosmetic products. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2015, 107, 386–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Klassen, N.V.; Marchington, D.; Mcgowan, H.C.E. H2O2 Determination by the I3-Method and by KMnO4 Titration. Anal. Chem. 1994, 66, 2921–2925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, D.; Luo, L.; Pang, Z.; Chen, X.; Cai, Y.; Wei, Q. Amperometric detection of hydrogen peroxide using a nanofibrous membrane sputtered with silver. RSC Adv. 2013, 4, 3857–3863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Treadaway, V.; Heikes, B.G.; McNeill, A.S.; Silwal, I.K.C.; O’Sullivan, D.W. Measurement of formic acid, acetic acid and hydroxyacetaldehyde, hydrogen peroxide, and methyl peroxide in air by chemical ionization mass spectrometry: airborne method development. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2018, 11, 1901–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Zhang, B.; Zhang, X.; Huang, D.; Li, S.; Yuan, H.; Wang, M.; Shen, Y. Co9S8 hollow spheres for enhanced electrochemical detection of hydrogen peroxide. Talanta 2015, 141, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, Z.; Xie, F.; Liu, Z.; Du, G.; Asiri, A.M.; Sun, X. High-Performance Non-Enzyme Hydrogen Peroxide Detection in Neutral Solution: Using a Nickel Borate Nanoarray as a 3D Electrochemical Sensor. Chemistry 2017, 23, 16179–16183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sun, X.; Guo, S.; Liu, Y.; Sun, S. Dumbbell-like PtPd-Fe3O4 nanoparticles for enhanced electrochemical detection of H2O2. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 4859–4863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Huang, J.; Zhu, Y.; Zhong, H.; Yang, X.; Li, C. Dispersed CuO nanoparticles on a silicon nanowire for improved performance of nonenzymatic H2O2 detection. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 7055–7062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wang, Y.; Cao, W.; Wang, L.; Zhuang, Q.; Ni, Y. Electrochemical determination of 2,4,6-trinitrophenol using a hybrid film composed of a copper-based metal organic framework and electroreduced graphene oxide. Microchim. Acta 2018, 185, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zhou, Y.; Li, C.; Hao, Y.; Ye, B.; Xu, M. Oriented growth of cross-linked metal-organic framework film on graphene surface for non-enzymatic electrochemical sensor of hydrogen peroxide in disinfectant. Talanta 2018, 188, 282–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Gao, C.Y.; Tian, H.R.; Ai, J.; Li, L.J.; Dang, S.; Lan, Y.Q.; Sun, Z.M. A microporous Cu-MOF with optimized open metal sites and pore spaces for high gas storage and active chemical fixation of CO2. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 7093–7094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Lian, X.Z.; Huang, Y.Y.; Zhu, Y.Y.; Fang, Y.; Zhao, R.; Joseph, E.; Li, J.L.; Pellois, J.P.; Zhou, H.C. Enzyme-MOF Nanoreactor Activates Nontoxic Paracetamol for Cancer Therapy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 5725–5730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Liang, X.-X.; Wang, N.; Qu, Y.-L.; Yang, L.-Y.; Wang, Y.-G.; Ouyang, X.-K. Facile Preparation of Metal-Organic Framework (MIL-125)/Chitosan Beads for Adsorption of Pb(II) from Aqueous Solutions. Molecules 2018, 23, 1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Wan, M.M.; Zhang, X.L.; Li, M.Y.; Chen, B.; Yin, J.; Jin, H.C.; Lin, L.; Chen, C.; Zhang, N. Hollow Pd/MOF Nanosphere with Double Shells as Multifunctional Catalyst for Hydrogenation Reaction. Small 2017, 13, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Jiang, X.X.; Zhao, C.J.; Zhong, C.J.; Li, J.P. The Electrochemical Sensors Based on MOF and Their Applications. Prog. Chem. 2017, 29, 1206–1214. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ni, Y.; Liao, Y.; Zheng, M.B.; Shao, S.J. In-situ growth of Co3O4 nanoparticles on mesoporous carbon nanofibers: a new nanocomposite for nonenzymatic amperometric sensing of H2O2. Microchim. Acta 2017, 184, 3689–3695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Phan, A.; Doonan, C.J.; Uriberomo, F.J.; Knobler, C.B.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O.M. Synthesis, structure, and carbon dioxide capture properties of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. Acc. Chem. Res. 2010, 43, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Li, C.; Wu, R.; Zou, J.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, Z.; Hu, X.; Yan, Y.; Ling, X. MNPs@anionic MOFs/ERGO with the size selectivity for the electrochemical determination of H2O2 released from living cells. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 116, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Vamvakaki, V.; Tsagaraki, K.; Chaniotakis, N. Carbon nanofiber-based glucose biosensor. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 5538–5542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Hou, X.B.; Zhou, H.M.; Zhang, J.; Cai, Y.B.; Huang, F.L.; Wei, Q.F. High Adsorption Pearl-Necklace-Like Composite Membrane Based on Metal-Organic Framework for Heavy Metal Ion Removal. Part. Part. Syst. Char. 2018, 35, 1700438–1700445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, D.; Yang, J.; Zhou, J.; Wei, Q.; Huang, F. Direct electrochemistry of laccase and a hydroquinone biosensing application employing ZnO loaded carbon nanofibers. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 61831–61840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lin, K.Y.; Chang, H.A. Ultra-high adsorption capacity of zeolitic imidazole framework-67 (ZIF-67) for removal of malachite green from water. Chemosphere 2015, 139, 624–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Gu, A.; Wang, G.; Jing, G.; Zhang, X.; Fang, B. An unusual H2O2 electrochemical sensor based on Ni(OH)2 nanoplates grown on Cu substrate. Electrochim. Acta 2010, 55, 7182–7187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xu, C.; Wang, J.; Zhou, J. Nanoporous PtNi alloy as an electrochemical sensor for ethanol and H2O2. Sens. Actuat. B-Chem. 2013, 182, 408–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, M.; He, S.; Chen, W. Co3O4 nanowires supported on 3D N-doped carbon foam as an electrochemical sensing platform for efficient H2O2 detection. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 11769–11776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wan, J.; Wang, W.; Yin, G.; Ma, X. Nonenzymatic H2O2 Sensor Based on Pt Nanoflower Electrode. J. Clust. Sci. 2012, 23, 1061–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lu, H.; Yu, S.; Fan, Y.; Yang, C.; Xu, D. Nonenzymatic hydrogen peroxide electrochemical sensor based on carbon-coated SnO2 supported Pt nanoparticles. Colloid Surface B 2013, 101, 106–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
Molecules 23 02552 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Crystal structure of ZIF-67.
Scheme 1. Crystal structure of ZIF-67.
Molecules 23 02552 sch001
Molecules 23 02552 g001 550
Figure 1. SEM images of (a) CNFs; (b) ZIF-67 nanocrystals; and (c) ZIF-67/CNFs composite.
Figure 1. SEM images of (a) CNFs; (b) ZIF-67 nanocrystals; and (c) ZIF-67/CNFs composite.
Molecules 23 02552 g001
Molecules 23 02552 g002 550
Figure 2. Element mapping images of the ZIF-67/CNFs composite.
Figure 2. Element mapping images of the ZIF-67/CNFs composite.
Molecules 23 02552 g002
Molecules 23 02552 g003 550
Figure 3. XRD patterns of simulated ZIF-67, CNFs, synthesized ZIF-67, and ZIF-67/CNFs composite.
Figure 3. XRD patterns of simulated ZIF-67, CNFs, synthesized ZIF-67, and ZIF-67/CNFs composite.
Molecules 23 02552 g003
Molecules 23 02552 g004 550
Figure 4. Nyquist plots for bare GCE, CNFs/GCE, ZIF-67/GCE and ZIF-67/CNFs/GCE in a solution of 0.1 M KCl containing 5 mM Fe(CN)63−/4− with the potential of 0.2 V, the frequency range from 0.01 Hz to 100,000 Hz and signal amplitude of 5 mV.
Figure 4. Nyquist plots for bare GCE, CNFs/GCE, ZIF-67/GCE and ZIF-67/CNFs/GCE in a solution of 0.1 M KCl containing 5 mM Fe(CN)63−/4− with the potential of 0.2 V, the frequency range from 0.01 Hz to 100,000 Hz and signal amplitude of 5 mV.
Molecules 23 02552 g004
Molecules 23 02552 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) CVs of different electrodes in 0.1 M NaOH solution containing 25 μM H2O2; (b) CVs of the ZIF-67/CNFs/GCE in 0.1 M NaOH solution at scan rates of 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350 mV s−1 (from inner to outer), respectively, inset: plots of the corresponding anodic and cathodic peak currents vs. scan rate; (c) CVs of the ZIF-67/CNFs/GCE in 0.1 M NaOH solution with the presence of varied H2O2 concentrations: 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 μM (scan rate: 100 mV s−1); (d) the corresponding calibration curve.
Figure 5. (a) CVs of different electrodes in 0.1 M NaOH solution containing 25 μM H2O2; (b) CVs of the ZIF-67/CNFs/GCE in 0.1 M NaOH solution at scan rates of 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350 mV s−1 (from inner to outer), respectively, inset: plots of the corresponding anodic and cathodic peak currents vs. scan rate; (c) CVs of the ZIF-67/CNFs/GCE in 0.1 M NaOH solution with the presence of varied H2O2 concentrations: 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 μM (scan rate: 100 mV s−1); (d) the corresponding calibration curve.
Molecules 23 02552 g005
Molecules 23 02552 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Schematic illustration of the reduction of H2O2 by ZIF-67/CNFs/GCE in NaOH solution.
Scheme 2. Schematic illustration of the reduction of H2O2 by ZIF-67/CNFs/GCE in NaOH solution.
Molecules 23 02552 sch002
Molecules 23 02552 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) Chronoamperometric responses of ZIF-67/CNFs/GCE on successive addition of different volume of H2O2 solutions into 0.1 M NaOH solution, applied potential: −0.2 V; (b) The calibration curves with nonlinear fitting.
Figure 6. (a) Chronoamperometric responses of ZIF-67/CNFs/GCE on successive addition of different volume of H2O2 solutions into 0.1 M NaOH solution, applied potential: −0.2 V; (b) The calibration curves with nonlinear fitting.
Molecules 23 02552 g006
Molecules 23 02552 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) Storage stability of the ZIF-67/CNFs/GCE in 0.1 M NaOH solution; (b) Chronoamperometric responses of ZIF-67/CNFs/GCE in 0.1 M NaOH solution at an applied potential of −0.2 V with 1mM H2O2 + 0.1 mM DA + 0.1 mM AA + 0.1 mM UA.
Figure 7. (a) Storage stability of the ZIF-67/CNFs/GCE in 0.1 M NaOH solution; (b) Chronoamperometric responses of ZIF-67/CNFs/GCE in 0.1 M NaOH solution at an applied potential of −0.2 V with 1mM H2O2 + 0.1 mM DA + 0.1 mM AA + 0.1 mM UA.
Molecules 23 02552 g007
Table
Table 1. Sensing performance comparison of different non-enzymatic sensor toward H2O2 1.
Table 1. Sensing performance comparison of different non-enzymatic sensor toward H2O2 1.
Electrode DescriptionDetection Limit (µM)Linear Range
(mM)		Sensitivity
(µA mM−1 cm−2)		Reference
Cu–Ni(OH)2/GCE1.50.005–0.14408[30]
NP-PtNi1.00.01–0.18-[31]
Co3O4-NWs/carbon foam1.40.01–1.4-[32]
Pt nanoflower600.1–0.9104[33]
Pt-SnO2@C0.10.001–0.17241.1[34]
ZIF-67/CNFs/GCE0.620.0025–0.19323This work
1 The dashes in the table represent values that were not reported in the respective references.
Table
Table 2. Recovery experiment of detection of H2O2 in milk samples.
Table 2. Recovery experiment of detection of H2O2 in milk samples.
SampleCadded (µM)Cfound (µM)Recovery (%)RSD (%)
Milk10099.599.51.5
102.3102.3
99.299.2
101.6101.6
98.998.9

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fu, Y.; Dai, J.; Ge, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ke, H.; Zhang, W. A Novel Non-Enzymatic Electrochemical Hydrogen Peroxide Sensor Based on a Metal-Organic Framework/Carbon Nanofiber Composite. Molecules 2018, 23, 2552. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23102552

AMA Style

Fu Y, Dai J, Ge Y, Zhang Y, Ke H, Zhang W. A Novel Non-Enzymatic Electrochemical Hydrogen Peroxide Sensor Based on a Metal-Organic Framework/Carbon Nanofiber Composite. Molecules. 2018; 23(10):2552. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23102552

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fu, Yijun, Jiamu Dai, Yan Ge, Yu Zhang, Huizhen Ke, and Wei Zhang. 2018. "A Novel Non-Enzymatic Electrochemical Hydrogen Peroxide Sensor Based on a Metal-Organic Framework/Carbon Nanofiber Composite" Molecules 23, no. 10: 2552. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23102552

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop