Next Article in Journal
Synthesis of New Indole Derivatives Structurally Related to Donepezil and Their Biological Evaluation as Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors
Next Article in Special Issue
QSAR Modeling on Benzo[c]phenanthridine Analogues as Topoisomerase I Inhibitors and Anti-cancer Agents
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation of SRN1-Type Coupling Adducts from Aliphatic gem-Dinitro Compounds in Ionic Liquids
Previous Article in Special Issue
Modeling Chemical Interaction Profiles: II. Molecular Docking, Spectral Data-Activity Relationship, and Structure-Activity Relationship Models for Potent and Weak Inhibitors of Cytochrome P450 CYP3A4 Isozyme
Molecules 2012, 17(5), 4791-4810; doi:10.3390/molecules17054791
Article

Comparison of Different Approaches to Define the Applicability Domain of QSAR Models

,
,
,
,
 and *
Received: 14 March 2012; in revised form: 13 April 2012 / Accepted: 16 April 2012 / Published: 25 April 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue QSAR and Its Applications)
Download PDF [317 KB, uploaded 18 June 2014]
Abstract: One of the OECD principles for model validation requires defining the Applicability Domain (AD) for the QSAR models. This is important since the reliable predictions are generally limited to query chemicals structurally similar to the training compounds used to build the model. Therefore, characterization of interpolation space is significant in defining the AD and in this study some existing descriptor-based approaches performing this task are discussed and compared by implementing them on existing validated datasets from the literature. Algorithms adopted by different approaches allow defining the interpolation space in several ways, while defined thresholds contribute significantly to the extrapolations. For each dataset and approach implemented for this study, the comparison analysis was carried out by considering the model statistics and relative position of test set with respect to the training space.
Keywords: QSAR; model validation; Applicability Domain; interpolation space QSAR; model validation; Applicability Domain; interpolation space
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Sahigara, F.; Mansouri, K.; Ballabio, D.; Mauri, A.; Consonni, V.; Todeschini, R. Comparison of Different Approaches to Define the Applicability Domain of QSAR Models. Molecules 2012, 17, 4791-4810.

AMA Style

Sahigara F, Mansouri K, Ballabio D, Mauri A, Consonni V, Todeschini R. Comparison of Different Approaches to Define the Applicability Domain of QSAR Models. Molecules. 2012; 17(5):4791-4810.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sahigara, Faizan; Mansouri, Kamel; Ballabio, Davide; Mauri, Andrea; Consonni, Viviana; Todeschini, Roberto. 2012. "Comparison of Different Approaches to Define the Applicability Domain of QSAR Models." Molecules 17, no. 5: 4791-4810.


Molecules EISSN 1420-3049 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert