Complex Intelligent Systems: Juxtaposition of Foundational Notions and a Research Agenda
AbstractThe cardinality of the class, C , of complex intelligent systems, i.e., systems of intelligent systems and their resources, is steadily increasing. Such an increase, whether designed, sometimes changes significantly and fundamentally, the structure of C . Recently,the study of members of C and its structure comes under a variety of multidisciplinary headings the most prominent of which include General Systems Theory, Complexity Science, Artificial Life, and Cybernetics. Their common characteristic is the quest for a unified theory of a certain class of systems like a living system or an organisation. So far, the only candidate for a general theory of intelligent systems is Newell's Soar. To my knowledge there is presently no candidate theory of C except Newell's claimed extensibility of Soar. This paper juxtaposes the elements of Newell's conceptual basis with those of an alternative conceptual framework based on the thesis that communication and understanding are the primary processes shaping the structure of C and its members. It is patently obvious that a research agenda for the study of C can be extremely varied and long. The third section of this paper presents a highly selective research agenda that aims to provoke discussion among complexity theory scientists. View Full-Text
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Gelepithis, P.A. Complex Intelligent Systems: Juxtaposition of Foundational Notions and a Research Agenda. Entropy 2001, 3, 247-258.
Gelepithis PA. Complex Intelligent Systems: Juxtaposition of Foundational Notions and a Research Agenda. Entropy. 2001; 3(4):247-258.Chicago/Turabian Style
Gelepithis, Petros A. 2001. "Complex Intelligent Systems: Juxtaposition of Foundational Notions and a Research Agenda." Entropy 3, no. 4: 247-258.