Next Article in Journal
Recent Advances in Conservation–Dissipation Formalism for Irreversible Processes
Next Article in Special Issue
Entropy Analysis of Protein Sequences Reveals a Hierarchical Organization
Previous Article in Journal
Measurement of the Temperature Using the Tomographic Representation of Thermal States for Quadratic Hamiltonians
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Environmental Parameters on the Stability of the DNA Molecule

1
Department of Radiophysics and Nanothechnology, Kuban State University, 350040 Krasnodar, Russia
2
Federal Research Center the Southern Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 344006 Rostov-on-Don, Russia
3
Department of Fundamental and Clinical Biochemistry, Kuban State Medical University, 350063 Krasnodar, Russia
4
Department of Technology of Fats, Cosmetics, Commodity Science, Processes and Devices Kuban State Technological University, 350072 Krasnodar, Russia
5
Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Entropy 2021, 23(11), 1446; https://doi.org/10.3390/e23111446
Submission received: 25 September 2021 / Revised: 27 October 2021 / Accepted: 29 October 2021 / Published: 31 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Entropy Transformations in Nonequilibrium and Other Complex Systems)

Abstract

:
Fluctuations in viscosity within the cell nucleus have wide limits. When a DNA molecule passes from the region of high viscosity values to the region of low values, open states, denaturation bubbles, and unweaving of DNA strands can occur. Stabilization of the molecule is provided by energy dissipation—dissipation due to interaction with the environment. Separate sections of a DNA molecule in a twisted state can experience supercoiling stress, which, among other things, is due to complex entropic effects caused by interaction with a solvent. In this work, based on the numerical solution of a mechanical mathematical model for the interferon alpha 17 gene and a fragment of the Drosophila gene, an analysis of the external environment viscosity influence on the dynamics of the DNA molecule and its stability was carried out. It has been shown that an increase in viscosity leads to a rapid stabilization of the angular vibrations of nitrogenous bases, while a decrease in viscosity changes the dynamics of DNA: the rate of change in the angular deviations of nitrogenous bases increases and the angular deformations of the DNA strands increase at each moment of time. These processes lead to DNA instability, which increases with time. Thus, the paper considers the influence of the external environment viscosity on the dissipation of the DNA nitrogenous bases’ vibrational motion energy. Additionally, the study on the basis of the described model of the molecular dynamics of physiological processes at different indicators of the rheological behavior of nucleoplasm will allow a deeper understanding of the processes of nonequilibrium physics of an active substance in a living cell to be obtained.

1. Introduction

Water is a universal solvent and medium in which most biochemical and biophysical reactions take place in the body. Depending on the chemical, biochemical, and even isotopic composition of the medium, the rate and nature of the biological processes occurring in it can change [1,2,3,4].
Thus, the reorganization of water molecules makes a significant contribution to changes in the enthalpy and entropy of DNA and proteins [5,6,7,8].
The free energy of the DNA nitrogenous bases pairs interactions [9,10,11,12] as well as the energy localization in it [13] depend on the parameters of the solvent. In addition, the dependence of the free energies of the nitrogenous bases stacking on the aqueous environment was noted [14].
It was found that the structure and dynamics of DNA can be influenced by water-miscible ethers of ethylene glycol through the implementation of mechanisms associated with hydrophobic catalysis. Experimental data show that this is accompanied by an increase in the energy of hydrogen bonds between pairs of nitrogenous bases and a decrease in the stacking energy [15].
Thus, it is obvious that it is necessary to consider biopolymers, taking into account the entropy and their interaction with the aqueous environment [16,17,18].
The study of the behavior of nucleic acids under the action of an external force at various indices of entropy in biological molecules is an actual topic [19,20]. It should be noted that almost all interactions of nucleoproteins and manipulations with DNA are associated with its mechanical deformations. Variations in the mechanical properties of DNA play a fundamental role in the regulation of various processes involved in the organization of chromatin on the scale of the entire genome [20], and DNA mechanics is an important component of its functional features [21,22]. Today, mechanical models are a powerful research method [23,24] that do not require a supercomputer to perform calculations. It should be noted that full atomic modeling is a separate complex task, for the solution of which it is necessary to take into account a huge number of parameters.
In our work, we investigated the mechanical properties of DNA using a mechanical mathematical model. The influence of the viscosity of the external environment on the internal dynamics and stability of the DNA molecule was investigated by the method of mathematical modeling.

2. Mathematical Model

To simulate the dynamics of a DNA molecule, we used a mathematical model that describes the rotational motion of nitrogenous bases around the sugar-phosphate chain. To build such a model, an analogy is used between a DNA molecule and a mechanical system consisting of two chains of interconnected pendulums.
In this case, the rotating pendulums corresponded to nitrogenous bases, and the elastic thread to which these pendulums are attached corresponded to the sugar-phosphate chains of the DNA molecule; the hydrogen bond of a pair of complementary nitrogenous bases corresponded to an elastic bond of the corresponding pair of pendulums [25].
This mathematical model includes the following Newton equations [26]:
I 1 i d 2 φ 1 i ( t ) d t 2 = K 1 i [ φ 1 i 1 ( t ) 2 φ 1 i ( t ) + φ 1 i + 1 ( t ) ] k 12 i R 1 i ( R 1 i + R 2 i ) sin φ 1 i k 12 i R 1 i R 2 i sin ( φ 1 i φ 2 i ) + + F 1 i ( t ) ,   i = 2 , n 1 ¯ , ( 1 )
I 1 1 d 2 φ 1 1 ( t ) d t 2 = K 1 1 [ φ 1 2 ( t ) φ 1 1 ( t ) ] k 12 1 R 1 1 ( R 1 1 + R 2 1 ) sin φ 1 1 k 12 1 R 1 1 R 2 1 sin ( φ 1 1 φ 2 1 ) + + F 1 1 ( t ) , ( 2 )
I 1 n d 2 φ 1 n ( t ) d t 2 = K 1 n [ φ 1 n 1 ( t ) φ 1 n ( t ) ] k 12 n R 1 n ( R 1 n + R 2 n ) sin φ 1 n k 12 n R 1 n R 2 n sin ( φ 1 n φ 2 n ) + + F 1 n ( t ) , ( 3 )
I 2 i d 2 φ 2 i ( t ) d t 2 = K 2 i [ φ 2 i 1 ( t ) 2 φ 2 i ( t ) + φ 2 i + 1 ( t ) ] + + k 12 i R 2 i ( R 1 i + R 2 i ) sin φ 2 i k 12 i R 1 i R 2 i sin ( φ 2 i φ 1 i ) + + F 2 i ( t ) ,   i = 2 , n 1 ¯ , ( 4 )
I 2 1 d 2 φ 2 1 ( t ) d t 2 = K 2 1 [ φ 2 2 ( t ) φ 2 1 ( t ) ] + + k 12 1 R 2 1 ( R 1 1 + R 2 1 ) sin φ 2 1 1 k 12 1 R 1 1 R 2 1 sin ( φ 2 1 φ 1 1 ) + + F 2 1 ( t ) , ( 5 )
I 2 n d 2 φ 2 n ( t ) d t 2 = K 2 n [ φ 2 n 1 ( t ) φ 2 n ( t ) ] + + k 12 n R 2 n ( R 1 n + R 2 n ) sin φ 2 n k 12 n R 1 n R 2 n sin ( φ 2 n φ 1 n ) + + F 2 n ( t ) . ( 6 )
Here,
φ j i ( t ) —angular deviation of the i-pendulum of the j-chain, counted counterclockwise, at time t;
I j i —moment of inertia of the i-pendulum of the j-chain;
R j i —distance from the center of mass of the i-pendulum of the j-chain to the thread;
K j i —constant characterizing the torque of the i-section of the j-thread;
k 12 i —constant characterizing the elastic properties of the connection of the i-pair of pendulums (describes the elastic properties of hydrogen bonds between pairs of nitrogenous bases);
F j i ( t ) —external influence on the i-pendulum of the j-chain at time t; and
n —the number of pairs of pendulums in the system under consideration.
In Equations (1)–(6), the first term to the right of the equal sign describes the force action from the elastic thread on the i-pendulum; the second term is from the side of the paired pendulum; and the third term is the external force action. The magnitude of the external influence is taken equal to F j i ( t ) = β j i d φ j i d t ( t ) + M ( t ) , where the term β j i d φ j i d t ( t ) models the effects of energy dissipation caused by the interaction with the liquid surrounding the DNA molecule, and the term M ( t ) models the external influence (the value of M(t) used by us coincides with the experimental [27]).
Note that the proposed model does not provide for the emergence of open states due to the breaking of hydrogen bonds.
We will add the initial conditions to Equations (1)–(6):
φ 1 i ( 0 ) = φ 1 , 0 i ,   d φ 1 i d t ( 0 ) = φ 1 , 1 i ,
φ 2 i ( 0 ) = φ 2 , 0 i ,   d φ 2 i d t ( 0 ) = φ 2 , 1 i ,   i = 1 , n ¯ .
For definiteness, we will assume that at t = 0, the system is in equilibrium, that is, in the initial conditions (7,8).
Problems (1)–(8) are the Cauchy problems for a system of 2n ordinary differential equations.

3. The Influence of the Viscosity of the External Environment on the DNA Dynamics

The influence of the external environment viscosity on DNA dynamics was investigated using the interferon alpha 17 gene (n = 980) and a fragment of the Drosophila gene (n = 5000) [28]. The values of the coefficients of Equations (1)–(6) were taken as presented in Table 1 (data are taken from [29]). At M ( t ) = 10−22 N·m, with this value of M(t), the pendulums’ angular deviation dynamics in the DNA molecule does not practically differ from the case of periodic external influences of the form cos(ωt)·10−22 N⋅m at ω ≤ 109 s−1 [30]. The values of the coefficients β j i in the right-hand side of Equations (1)–(6), characterizing the viscosity of the external medium, were equal to the corresponding values of β from Table 1, multiplied by the parameter λ. Thus, a change in the parameter λ corresponded to changes in the viscosity of the external medium (the λ parameter characterizing the viscosity of the surrounding liquid can depend on various factors: pressure, temperature, chemical composition). The parameter λ was taken from 0.1 to 4, since the viscosity of the environment can vary over a wide range [31].
The study of DNA dynamics was carried out on the basis of a numerical solution of problems (1)–(8), and the calculation results are presented in graphical form.
The dependence of the problem (1)–(8) solution from the viscosity was determined using the angular deviations and average angular deviations of the first chain of the DNA molecule:
φ ( t ) = n 1 i = 1 n φ 1 i ( t )
Figure 1 shows a graph of the angular deviations of the first chain of the interferon gene in the interval [0; 2 × 10−9 s] at λ = 1.0.
From Figure 1, we see that after removing the system from equilibrium, a gradual stabilization of the amplitude of angular oscillations occurs.
Figure 2 shows the graphs of the average angular deviations of the first chain of the interferon gene in the interval [0; 2 × 10−9 s] for different values of parameter λ.
From Figure 2, we can see that a decrease in the viscosity of the external environment leads to an increase in the amplitude of the average angular deviations of nitrogenous bases, which can lead to the emergence of open states and unweaving of the DNA molecule.
Figure 3 and Figure 4 show graphs of the first chain angular deviations of the interferon gene in the interval [1.9 × 10−9 s; 2 × 10−9 s] at λ = 1.0 and λ = 0.1, respectively. It can be seen that at λ = 0.1, the graphs of the angular deviations change in time more significantly than at λ = 1.0 (which explains the increase in the amplitude of the mean angular deviations). In addition, at each moment of time at λ = 0.1, the DNA strand undergoes significantly larger angular deformations than at λ = 1.0, which leads to a decrease in the stability of the DNA molecule.
For λ = 0.1, the time interval was increased to [0; 6 × 10−9s], and the results are shown in Figure 5 (graph of the average angular deviations of the first chain of the interferon gene presented); Figure 6 and Figure 7 show the graphs of the angular deviations of the first chain of the interferon gene in the interval [5.9 × 10−9 c; 6 × 10−9 s] at λ = 1 and λ = 0.1, respectively.
Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7 show that over a long time interval at a low viscosity of the solvent (λ = 0.1), no attenuation of the amplitude of the angular deviations of nitrogenous bases was observed (a violation of the DNA molecule stability due to absence of vibration energy dissipation).
Figure 8 shows the graphs of the first chain average angular deviations of the Drosophila gene fragment (5000 bases) in the interval [0; 2 × 10−9 s] for different values of λ.
Figure 8 also shows that the dissipation of vibration energy due to the influence of the viscosity of the external environment on the dynamics of angular vibrations of the DNA molecule has the same characteristics as for the interferon gene.
Figure 9 shows the graph of the average angular deviations of the first chain of the Drosophila gene fragment in the interval [0; 6 × 10−9 s] at λ = 0.1.

4. Discussion

It is known that the dynamics of a number of intracellular processes, primarily the transport of biomolecules and organelles within the nucleus as well as the peculiarities of the development of certain diseases, for example, Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s, aging of the body, and various forms of cancer are accompanied by disturbances in the functioning of the genetic apparatus including the nucleolus, which was also characterized by pronounced changes in the rheological behavior of the nucleoplasm, one of the key mechanisms in the development of this pathology [32,33,34]. Using microrheological approaches, it has been shown in a number of works that the viscosity of the nucleoplasm, which refers to the content of the inner part of the nucleus outside the nucleolus, and represents the dissolved chromatin, ranges from 25 to 1000 Pa·s [35,36], significantly exceeding the viscosity of the nucleolus. Taking into account such wide fluctuations of viscosity inside the nucleus, the study of its influence on the appearance of open states is of particular interest, since when a DNA molecule passes from the region of high viscosity values to the region of its low values, it can lead to the emergence of open states [37], denaturation bubbles [38], and unweaving of DNA strands. Moreover, a large variability of angular deviations amplitude is typical for genes with a smaller nucleotide sequence (which can lead to an increase in DNA unweaving risk), and, consequently, failures in reading the genetic information, for example, due to destabilization of DNA supercoiling or violations of the torque of eukaryotic RNA polymerase. The described processes can be realized, for example, due to the influence of the viscosity of the DNA environment on the cooperative effects that are observed during the binding of low molecular weight ligands and regulatory proteins to DNA [39,40] and allosteric regulation of expression genes [41,42].
Molecule stabilization is provided by energy dissipation—dissipation due to interaction with the environment [43]. It should be noted that the hydration shell of the DNA molecule is inhomogeneous (both at the DNA–water interface and in the minor groove, where fluctuations in the groove width occur on the same time scale as the rearrangements of water hydrogen bonds) [44]. Separate sections of a DNA molecule in a twisted state can be under superhelical stress [45], which, among other things, is due to complex entropic effects caused by interaction with a solvent [9]. However, at this stage of the development of our model, we did not separate the phases of the aqueous environment, but considered all the water around the DNA molecule to be the same, which creates a general viscosity. The model takes into account the torsion of the sugar-phosphate strand, but the influence of the global conformation on the DNA dynamics is not taken into account. At the same time, the model makes it possible to take into account the effect of viscosity on any part of the DNA molecule.
Thus, the calculation results indicate the adequacy of the mechanical model used and the values of the coefficients. As noted earlier, mechanical models of DNA are a powerful tool for studying its properties [46]. At the same time, the mechanical model we used takes into account the heterogeneity of the sequence of nucleotide pairs, the energy of hydrogen bonds between pairs of nitrogenous bases, interaction with the environment, the appearance of open states [47], and makes it possible to replace a hydrogen atom with deuterium in hydrogen bonds between base pairs, etc. The model makes it possible to calculate the following parameters: the probability of occurrence of open states depending on the critical energy of hydrogen bonds; the likelihood of the appearance of bubbles of denaturation of various lengths throughout the gene [47]; to determine the most probable places of occurrence of open states in the gene [48]; and calculate the frequency of oscillations of a gene depending on external influences [30], etc.

5. Conclusions

In this work, on the basis of a numerical solution of a mechanical mathematical model for the interferon alpha 17 gene and a fragment of the Drosophila gene, an analysis of the influence of the viscosity of the external environment on the dynamics of the DNA molecule and its stability was carried out. It has been shown that an increase in viscosity leads to the rapid stabilization of angular vibrations, while a decrease in viscosity changes the dynamics of the DNA molecule: the rate of change in the angular deviations of nitrogenous bases increases and the angular deformations of the chains of the DNA molecule increase at each moment of time. These processes lead to instability of the DNA molecule, which increases with time. It is important to emphasize that the viscoelastic reorganization of the nucleoplasm, apparently, determines the rapid component of DNA relaxation inside the nucleus, supporting, for example, its supercoiling and preventing the occurrence of abnormal angular deviations that stimulate the emergence of open states. At the same time, genes with a smaller nucleotide sequence are characterized by a large amplitude of angular oscillations, which increases the risk of errors in reading information during transcription. Modeling the dynamics of a DNA molecule using the mathematical model presented in this work, is of interest to determine the risks of failures in reading genetic information in diseases accompanied by violations of microrheological parameters in the nucleus, which can be observed in various pathologies (neurodegenerative diseases of aging, oncology, and others). Additionally, the study on the basis of the described model of the molecular dynamics of physiological processes at different indicators of the rheological behavior of nucleoplasm will allow obtaining a deeper understanding of the processes of nonequilibrium physics of an active substance in a living cell.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.D. and S.D.; Methodology, A.B.; Software, A.S.; Formal analysis, Y.N.; Data curation, M.B.; Writing—original draft preparation, S.D. and M.D.; Writing—review and editing, A.B.; Visualization, A.E.; Supervision, E.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research and Administration of the Krasnodar Region (project no. 19-44-230026), state assignment of the SSC RAS (no. AAAA-A19-119040390083-6), and the Kuban Scientific Foundation (project no. MFI-20.1-36/20), and Program of Fundamental Research for State Academies for the years 2013–2020 (project no. 01201363818).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Saha, D.; Mukherjee, A. Effect of water and ionic liquids on biomolecules. Biophys. Rev. 2018, 10, 795–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Basov, A.; Fedulova, L.; Vasilevskaya, E.; Dzhimak, S. Possible mechanisms of biological effects observed in living systems during 2H/1H isotope fractionation and deuterium interactions with other biogenic isotopes. Molecules 2019, 24, 4101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Di Rocco, G.; Battistuzzi, G.; Borsari, M.; Bortolotti, C.A.; Ranieri, A.; Sola, M. The enthalpic and entropic terms of the reduction potential of metalloproteins: Determinants and interplay. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 445, 214071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shukla, S.K.; Mikkola, J.-P. Use of Ionic Liquids in Protein and DNA Chemistry. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 598662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Liu, L.; Yang, C.; Guo, Q.-X. A study on the enthalpy-entropy compensation in protein unfolding. Biophys. Chem. 2000, 84, 239–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dragan, A.I.; Read, C.M.; Crane-Robinson, C. Enthalpy–entropy compensation: The role of solvation. Europ. Biophys. J. 2017, 46, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Aristov, V.V. Biological systems as nonequilibrium structures described by kinetic methods. Res. Phys. 2019, 13, 102232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Michieletto, D. Non-Equilibrium Living Polymers. Entropy 2020, 22, 1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, R.; Mak, C.H. A Deep Dive into DNA Base Pairing Interactions under Water. J. Phys. Chem. B 2020, 124, 5559–5570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kannan, S.; Zacharias, M. Folding of a DNA hairpin loop structure in explicit solvent using replica-exchange molecular dynamics simulations. Biophys. J. 2007, 93, 3218–3228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Smrek, J.; Garamella, J.; Robertson-Anderson, R.; Michieletto, D. Topological tuning of DNA mobility in entangled solutions of supercoiled plasmids. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabf9260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Petruska, J.; Sowers, L.C.; Goodman, M.F. Comparison of nucleotide interactions in water, proteins, and vacuum: Model for DNA polymerase fidelity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1986, 83, 1559–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Tabi, C.B.; Bineli, G.; Mohamadou, A. Energy patterns in twist-opening models of DNA with solvent interactions. J. Biol. Phys. 2015, 41(4), 391–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Hase, F.; Zacharias, M. Free energy analysis and mechanism of base pair stacking in nicked DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 7100–7108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Feng, B.; Sosa, R.P.; Martensson, A.K.F.; Jiang, K.; Tong, A.; Dorfman, K.D.; Takahashi, M.; Lincoln, P.; Bustamante, C.J.; Westerlund, F.; et al. Hydrophobic catalysis and a potential biological role of DNA unstacking induced by environment effects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 17169–17174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Kinoshita, M. Importance of translational entropy of water in biological self-assembly processes like protein folding. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10, 1064–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ostermeir, K.; Zacharias, M. Rapid alchemical free energy calculation employing a generalized born implicit solvent model. J. Phys. Chem. B 2015, 119, 968–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Frank-Kamenetskii, M.D.; Prakash, S. Fluctuations in the DNA double helix: A critical review. Phys. Life Rev. 2014, 11, 153–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Einert, T.R.; Orland, H.; Netz, R.R. Secondary structure formation of homopolymeric single-stranded nucleic acids including force and loop entropy: Implications for DNA hybridization. Eur. Phys. J. E 2011, 34, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Kinoshita, M. Roles of translational motion of water molecules in sustaining life. Front. Biosci. 2009, 14, 3419–3454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Basu, A.; Bobrovnikov, D.G.; Ha, T. DNA mechanics and its biological impact. J. Mol. Biol. 2021, 433, 166861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Basu, A.; Bobrovnikov, D.G.; Qureshi, Z.; Kayikcioglu, T.; Ngo, T.T.M.; Ranjan, A.; Eustermann, S.; Cieza, B.; Morgan, M.T.; Hejna, M.; et al. Measuring DNA mechanics on the genome scale. Nature 2021, 589, 462–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Manghi, M.; Destainville, N. Physics of base-pairing dynamics in DNA. Phys. Rep. 2016, 631, 1–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Yakushevich, L.V.; Krasnobaeva, L.A. Ideas and methods of nonlinear mathematics and theoretical physics in DNA science: The McLaughlin-Scott equation and its application to study the DNA open state dynamics. Biophys. Rev. 2021, 13, 315–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dzhimak, S.S.; Drobotenko, M.I.; Basov, A.A.; Svidlov, A.A.; Fedulova, L.V.; Lyasota, O.M.; Baryshev, M.G. Mathematical modeling of open state in DNA molecule depending on the deuterium concentration in the surrounding liquid media at different values of hydrogen bond disruption energy. Dokl. Biochem. Biophys. 2018, 483, 359–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Yakushevich, L.V. Nonlinear Physics of DNA; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2007; 252p. [Google Scholar]
  27. Bryant, Z.; Stone, M.D.; Gore, J.; Smith, S.B.; Cozzarelli, N.R.; Bustamante, C. Structural transitions and elasticity from torque measurements on DNA. Nature. 2003, 424, 338–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. A First Look at D. ananassae Fosmid 1049B07. Available online: http://www.discoveryandinnovation.com/bioinformatics/results/Szauter/1049B07.html (accessed on 24 September 2021).
  29. Yakushevich, L.V.; Krasnobaeva, L.A. Forced oscillations of DNA bases. Biophysics 2016, 61, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Svidlov, A.; Drobotenko, M.; Basov, A.; Gerasimenko, E.; Malyshko, V.; Elkina, A.; Baryshev, M.; Dzhimak, S. DNA dynamics under periodic force effects. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Ferreira, L.A.; Uversky, V.N.; Zaslavsky, B.Y. Effects of amino acids on solvent properties of water. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 277, 123–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Núñez Villacís, L.; Wong, M.S.; Ferguson, L.L.; Hein, N.; George, A.J.; Hannan, K.M. New roles for the nucleolus in health and disease. BioEssays 2018, 40, 1700233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Tiku, V.; Antebi, A. Nucleolar function in lifespan regulation. Trends Cell Biol. 2018, 28, 662–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Caragine, C.M.; Haley, S.C.; Zidovska, A. Surface fluctuations and coalescence of nucleolar droplets in the human cell nucleus. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 121, 148101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. de Vries, A.H.; Krenn, B.E.; van Driel, R.; Subramaniam, V.; Kanger, J.S. Direct observation of nanomechanical properties of chromatin in living cells. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 1424–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Celedon, A.; Hale, C.M.; Wirtz, D. Magnetic manipulation of nanorods in the nucleus of living cells. Biophys. J. 2011, 101, 1880–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Palmeri, J.; Manghi, M.; Destainville, N. Thermal denaturation of fluctuating DNA driven by bending entropy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 99, 088103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Sicard, F.; Destainville, N.; Rousseau, P.; Tardin, C.; Manghi, M. Dynamical control of denaturation bubble nucleation in supercoiled DNA minicircles. Phys. Rev. E 2020, 101, 012403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hogan, M.; Dattagupta, N.; Crothers, D.M. Transmission of allosteric effects in DNA. Nature 1979, 278, 521–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Nechipurenko, Y.D.; Gursky, G.V. Cooperative effects on binding of proteins to DNA. Biophys. Chem. 1986, 24, 195–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lefstin, J.A.; Yamamoto, K.R. Allosteric effects of DNA on transcriptional regulators. Nature 1998, 392, 885–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kim, S.; Broströmer, E.; Xing, D.; Jin, J.; Chong, S.; Ge, H.; Wang, S.; Gu, C.; Yang, L.; Gao, Y.Q.; et al. Probing allostery through DNA. Science 2013, 339, 816–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Petruska, J.; Goodman, M.F. Enthalpy-entropy compensation in DNA melting thermodynamics. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 746–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Duboué-Dijon, E.; Fogarty, A.C.; Hynes, J.T.; Laage, D. Dynamical Disorder in the DNA Hydration Shell. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 7610–7620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pyne, A.L.B.; Noy, A.; Main, K.H.S.; Velasco-Berrelleza, V.; Piperakis, M.M.; Mitchenall, L.A.; Cugliandolo, F.M.; Beton, J.G.; Stevenson, C.E.M.; Hoogenboom, B.W.; et al. Base-pair resolution analysis of the effect of supercoiling on DNA flexibility and major groove recognition by triplex-forming oligonucleotides. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Shigaev, A.S.; Ponomarev, O.A.; Lakhno, V.D. Theoretical and experimental investigations of DNA open states. Math. Biol. Bioinform. 2013, 8, 553–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Svidlov, A.A.; Drobotenko, M.I.; Basov, A.A.; Elkina, A.A.; Gerasimenko, E.O.; Malyshko, V.V.; Baryshev, M.G.; Dzhimak, S.S. Influence of the 2H/1H isotope composition of the water environment on the probability of denaturation bubble formation in a DNA molecule. Phys. Wave Phenom. 2021, 29, 180–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Basov, A.; Drobotenko, M.; Svidlov, A.; Gerasimenko, E.; Malyshko, V.; Elkina, A.; Baryshev, M.; Dzhimak, S. Inequality in the frequency of the open states occurrence depends on single 2H/1H replacement in DNA. Molecules 2020, 25, 3753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Graph of angular deviations of the first chain of the interferon gene in the interval [0; 2 × 10−9 s] at λ = 1.0.
Figure 1. Graph of angular deviations of the first chain of the interferon gene in the interval [0; 2 × 10−9 s] at λ = 1.0.
Entropy 23 01446 g001
Figure 2. The average angular deviations (with vertical shift) of the first chain of the interferon gene in the interval [0; 2 × 10−9 s]: 1—at λ = 0.1; 2—at λ = 0.5; 3—at λ = 1.0; 4—at λ = 2.0; 5—at λ = 4.0.
Figure 2. The average angular deviations (with vertical shift) of the first chain of the interferon gene in the interval [0; 2 × 10−9 s]: 1—at λ = 0.1; 2—at λ = 0.5; 3—at λ = 1.0; 4—at λ = 2.0; 5—at λ = 4.0.
Entropy 23 01446 g002
Figure 3. Graph of angular deviations of the first chain of the interferon gene in the interval [1.9 × 10−9 s; 2 × 10−9 s] at λ = 1.0.
Figure 3. Graph of angular deviations of the first chain of the interferon gene in the interval [1.9 × 10−9 s; 2 × 10−9 s] at λ = 1.0.
Entropy 23 01446 g003
Figure 4. Graph of angular deviations of the first chain of the interferon gene in the interval [1.9 × 10−9 s; 2 × 10−9 s] at λ = 0.1.
Figure 4. Graph of angular deviations of the first chain of the interferon gene in the interval [1.9 × 10−9 s; 2 × 10−9 s] at λ = 0.1.
Entropy 23 01446 g004
Figure 5. Graph of the average angular deviations of the first chain of the interferon gene in the interval [0; 6 × 10−9 s] at λ = 0.1.
Figure 5. Graph of the average angular deviations of the first chain of the interferon gene in the interval [0; 6 × 10−9 s] at λ = 0.1.
Entropy 23 01446 g005
Figure 6. Graph of angular deviations of the first chain of the interferon gene in the interval [5.9 × 10−9 s; 6 × 10−9 s] at λ = 1.0.
Figure 6. Graph of angular deviations of the first chain of the interferon gene in the interval [5.9 × 10−9 s; 6 × 10−9 s] at λ = 1.0.
Entropy 23 01446 g006
Figure 7. Graph of angular deviations of the first chain of the interferon gene in the interval [5.9 × 10−9 s; 6 × 10−9 s] at λ = 0.1.
Figure 7. Graph of angular deviations of the first chain of the interferon gene in the interval [5.9 × 10−9 s; 6 × 10−9 s] at λ = 0.1.
Entropy 23 01446 g007
Figure 8. The average angular deviations (with vertical shift) of the first chain of the Drosophila gene fragment in the interval [0; 2 × 10−9 s]: 1—at λ = 0.1; 2—at λ = 0.5; 3—at λ = 1.0; 4—at λ = 2.0; 5—at λ = 4.0.
Figure 8. The average angular deviations (with vertical shift) of the first chain of the Drosophila gene fragment in the interval [0; 2 × 10−9 s]: 1—at λ = 0.1; 2—at λ = 0.5; 3—at λ = 1.0; 4—at λ = 2.0; 5—at λ = 4.0.
Entropy 23 01446 g008
Figure 9. Graph of the average angular deviations of the first chain of the Drosophila gene fragment in the interval [0; 6 × 10−9 s] at λ = 0.1.
Figure 9. Graph of the average angular deviations of the first chain of the Drosophila gene fragment in the interval [0; 6 × 10−9 s] at λ = 0.1.
Entropy 23 01446 g009
Table 1. Equation coefficients (1)–(6).
Table 1. Equation coefficients (1)–(6).
Type of Base A T G C
I 10 44 ,   kg m 2 7.614.868.224.11
R , Å5.804.805.704.70
K 10 18 ,     J 2.351.612.271.54
k 12 H 10 2 ,   N / m 6.206.209.609.60
β 10 34 ,   J s 4.252.914.102.79
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Svidlov, A.; Drobotenko, M.; Basov, A.; Gerasimenko, E.; Elkina, A.; Baryshev, M.; Nechipurenko, Y.; Dzhimak, S. Influence of Environmental Parameters on the Stability of the DNA Molecule. Entropy 2021, 23, 1446. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23111446

AMA Style

Svidlov A, Drobotenko M, Basov A, Gerasimenko E, Elkina A, Baryshev M, Nechipurenko Y, Dzhimak S. Influence of Environmental Parameters on the Stability of the DNA Molecule. Entropy. 2021; 23(11):1446. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23111446

Chicago/Turabian Style

Svidlov, Alexander, Mikhail Drobotenko, Alexander Basov, Eugeny Gerasimenko, Anna Elkina, Mikhail Baryshev, Yury Nechipurenko, and Stepan Dzhimak. 2021. "Influence of Environmental Parameters on the Stability of the DNA Molecule" Entropy 23, no. 11: 1446. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23111446

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop