Next Article in Journal
Axiomatic Characterization of the Quantum Relative Entropy and Free Energy
Previous Article in Journal
On Linear Coding over Finite Rings and Applications to Computing
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Two-Time Interpretation and Macroscopic Time-Reversibility
Article Menu
Issue 6 (June) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessReview
Entropy 2017, 19(6), 240; doi:10.3390/e19060240

Maxwell’s Demon—A Historical Review

Department of Physics, University of Puget Sound, 1500 N Warner St, Tacoma, WA 98416, USA
Academic Editor: Kevin H. Knuth
Received: 20 April 2017 / Revised: 12 May 2017 / Accepted: 19 May 2017 / Published: 23 May 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Limits to the Second Law of Thermodynamics: Experiment and Theory)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1018 KB, uploaded 23 May 2017]   |  

Abstract

For more than 140 years Maxwell’s demon has intrigued, enlightened, mystified, frustrated, and challenged physicists in unique and interesting ways. Maxwell’s original conception was brilliant and insightful, but over the years numerous different versions of Maxwell’s demon have been presented. Most versions have been answered with reasonable physical arguments, with each of these answers (apparently) keeping the second law of thermodynamics intact. Though the laws of physics did not change in this process of questioning and answering, we have learned a lot along the way about statistical mechanics and thermodynamics. This paper will review a selected history and discuss some of the interesting historical characters who have participated. View Full-Text
Keywords: Maxwell’s demon; entropy; Maxwell; second law of thermodynamics; Szilard; information; erasure; Landauer Maxwell’s demon; entropy; Maxwell; second law of thermodynamics; Szilard; information; erasure; Landauer
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Rex, A. Maxwell’s Demon—A Historical Review. Entropy 2017, 19, 240.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Entropy EISSN 1099-4300 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top