Comparing Relational and Ontological Triple Stores in Healthcare Domain
AbstractToday’s technological improvements have made ubiquitous healthcare systems that converge into smart healthcare applications in order to solve patients’ problems, to communicate effectively with patients, and to improve healthcare service quality. The first step of building a smart healthcare information system is representing the healthcare data as connected, reachable, and sharable. In order to achieve this representation, ontologies are used to describe the healthcare data. Combining ontological healthcare data with the used and obtained data can be maintained by storing the entire health domain data inside big data stores that support both relational and graph-based ontological data. There are several big data stores and different types of big data sets in the healthcare domain. The goal of this paper is to determine the most applicable ontology data store for storing the big healthcare data. For this purpose, AllegroGraph and Oracle 12c data stores are compared based on their infrastructural capacity, loading time, and query response times. Hence, healthcare ontologies (GENE Ontology, Gene Expression Ontology (GEXO), Regulation of Transcription Ontology (RETO), Regulation of Gene Expression Ontology (REXO)) are used to measure the ontology loading time. Thereafter, various queries are constructed and executed for GENE ontology in order to measure the capacity and query response times for the performance comparison between AllegroGraph and Oracle 12c triple stores. View Full-Text
Share & Cite This Article
Can, O.; Sezer, E.; Bursa, O.; Unalir, M.O. Comparing Relational and Ontological Triple Stores in Healthcare Domain. Entropy 2017, 19, 30.
Can O, Sezer E, Bursa O, Unalir MO. Comparing Relational and Ontological Triple Stores in Healthcare Domain. Entropy. 2017; 19(1):30.Chicago/Turabian Style
Can, Ozgu; Sezer, Emine; Bursa, Okan; Unalir, Murat O. 2017. "Comparing Relational and Ontological Triple Stores in Healthcare Domain." Entropy 19, no. 1: 30.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.