Next Article in Journal
Concurrence Measurement for the Two-Qubit Optical and Atomic States
Next Article in Special Issue
Modeling Soil Moisture Profiles in Irrigated Fields by the Principle of Maximum Entropy
Previous Article in Journal
New Hyperbolic Function Solutions for Some Nonlinear Partial Differential Equation Arising in Mathematical Physics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Kolmogorov Complexity Based Information Measures Applied to the Analysis of Different River Flow Regimes
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Entropy 2015, 17(6), 4271-4292;

A Hybrid Physical and Maximum-Entropy Landslide Susceptibility Model

Department of Geography & Environment, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Ave., San Francisco, CA 94132, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Nathaniel A. Brunsell
Received: 28 February 2015 / Revised: 28 May 2015 / Accepted: 12 June 2015 / Published: 19 June 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Entropy in Hydrology)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [8771 KB, uploaded 23 June 2015]


The clear need for accurate landslide susceptibility mapping has led to multiple approaches. Physical models are easily interpreted and have high predictive capabilities but rely on spatially explicit and accurate parameterization, which is commonly not possible. Statistical methods can include other factors influencing slope stability such as distance to roads, but rely on good landslide inventories. The maximum entropy (MaxEnt) model has been widely and successfully used in species distribution mapping, because data on absence are often uncertain. Similarly, knowledge about the absence of landslides is often limited due to mapping scale or methodology. In this paper a hybrid approach is described that combines the physically-based landslide susceptibility model “Stability INdex MAPping” (SINMAP) with MaxEnt. This method is tested in a coastal watershed in Pacifica, CA, USA, with a well-documented landslide history including 3 inventories of 154 scars on 1941 imagery, 142 in 1975, and 253 in 1983. Results indicate that SINMAP alone overestimated susceptibility due to insufficient data on root cohesion. Models were compared using SINMAP stability index (SI) or slope alone, and SI or slope in combination with other environmental factors: curvature, a 50-m trail buffer, vegetation, and geology. For 1941 and 1975, using slope alone was similar to using SI alone; however in 1983 SI alone creates an Areas Under the receiver operator Curve (AUC) of 0.785, compared with 0.749 for slope alone. In maximum-entropy models created using all environmental factors, the stability index (SI) from SINMAP represented the greatest contributions in all three years (1941: 48.1%; 1975: 35.3; and 1983: 48%), with AUC of 0.795, 0822, and 0.859, respectively; however; using slope instead of SI created similar overall AUC values, likely due to the combined effect with plan curvature indicating focused hydrologic inputs and vegetation identifying the effect of root cohesion. The combined approach––using either stability index or slope––highlights the importance of additional environmental variables in modeling landslide initiation. View Full-Text
Keywords: landslide susceptibility; maximum entropy model; physical model; hybrid model; cohesion landslide susceptibility; maximum entropy model; physical model; hybrid model; cohesion
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Davis, J.; Blesius, L. A Hybrid Physical and Maximum-Entropy Landslide Susceptibility Model. Entropy 2015, 17, 4271-4292.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Entropy EISSN 1099-4300 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top