Entropy 2010, 12(8), 1936-1945; doi:10.3390/e12081936
Article

In Defense of Gibbs and the Traditional Definition of the Entropy of Distinguishable Particles

email
Received: 21 December 2009; in revised form: 2 August 2010 / Accepted: 20 August 2010 / Published: 24 August 2010
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gibbs Paradox and Its Resolutions)
Download PDF [198 KB, uploaded 24 August 2010]
Abstract: The traditional Gibbs’ calculation of the entropy of distinguishable classical particles that leads to Gibbs Paradox has been criticized recently. This criticism, if valid, would require a substantially different definition of entropy in general. However, the traditional definition of entropy works quite well in situations where the distinguishability of classical particles is taken seriously while a suggested replacement definition fails.
Keywords: Gibbs; entropy; distinguishable particles; information
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Nagle, J.F. In Defense of Gibbs and the Traditional Definition of the Entropy of Distinguishable Particles. Entropy 2010, 12, 1936-1945.

AMA Style

Nagle JF. In Defense of Gibbs and the Traditional Definition of the Entropy of Distinguishable Particles. Entropy. 2010; 12(8):1936-1945.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nagle, John F. 2010. "In Defense of Gibbs and the Traditional Definition of the Entropy of Distinguishable Particles." Entropy 12, no. 8: 1936-1945.


Entropy EISSN 1099-4300 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert