Entropy 2010, 12(8), 1936-1945; doi:10.3390/e12081936
Article

In Defense of Gibbs and the Traditional Definition of the Entropy of Distinguishable Particles

Department of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
Received: 21 December 2009; in revised form: 2 August 2010 / Accepted: 20 August 2010 / Published: 24 August 2010
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gibbs Paradox and Its Resolutions)
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [198 KB, uploaded 24 August 2010 13:45 CEST]
Abstract: The traditional Gibbs’ calculation of the entropy of distinguishable classical particles that leads to Gibbs Paradox has been criticized recently. This criticism, if valid, would require a substantially different definition of entropy in general. However, the traditional definition of entropy works quite well in situations where the distinguishability of classical particles is taken seriously while a suggested replacement definition fails.
Keywords: Gibbs; entropy; distinguishable particles; information

Article Statistics

Load and display the download statistics.

Citations to this Article

Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Nagle, J.F. In Defense of Gibbs and the Traditional Definition of the Entropy of Distinguishable Particles. Entropy 2010, 12, 1936-1945.

AMA Style

Nagle JF. In Defense of Gibbs and the Traditional Definition of the Entropy of Distinguishable Particles. Entropy. 2010; 12(8):1936-1945.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nagle, John F. 2010. "In Defense of Gibbs and the Traditional Definition of the Entropy of Distinguishable Particles." Entropy 12, no. 8: 1936-1945.

Entropy EISSN 1099-4300 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert