Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (39)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 577 KiB  
Review
Co-Occurring Genomic Alterations in NSCLC: Making Order into a Crowded List
by Ilaria Attili, Federico Pio Fabrizio and Filippo de Marinis
Cancers 2025, 17(14), 2388; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17142388 - 18 Jul 2025
Viewed by 639
Abstract
Worldwide, lung cancer is one of the most common cancers, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) including up to 80–85% of all lung cancer diagnoses. The landscape of NSCLC is characterized by a heterogeneous spectrum of gene alterations, with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) [...] Read more.
Worldwide, lung cancer is one of the most common cancers, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) including up to 80–85% of all lung cancer diagnoses. The landscape of NSCLC is characterized by a heterogeneous spectrum of gene alterations, with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and targeted treatments that significantly improve survival outcomes for patients with oncogene-addicted NSCLC, offering superior efficacy, and often favorable safety and tolerability profiles compared to chemotherapy-based treatments. However, the complexity of NSCLC extends to co-occurring genomic alterations or amplifications in tumor suppressors and other oncogenes, such as TP53, STK11, KEAP1, PIK3CA, RB1, and others, that significantly influence disease progression, therapeutic resistance, and clinical outcomes. These co-mutations often contribute to the development of primary and acquired resistance to targeted therapies, complicating decision-making strategies. This review provides a timely and comprehensive synthesis of current insights into co-mutations in NSCLC, with a particular focus on their clinical implications, and offers a novel perspective by integrating recent molecular insights with therapeutic challenges, addressing existing knowledge gaps through a more integrative and clinically oriented analysis of co-mutations. Advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) and molecular profiling have enabled the identification of these co-alterations, paving the way for more personalized therapeutic approaches. However, challenges remain in interpreting the functional interplay of co-mutations and translating these insights into effective clinical interventions. This review also highlights the significance of co-mutations in shaping NSCLC biology, and discusses their impact on current therapeutic paradigms, emphasizing the need for integrative biomarker-driven approaches to improve outcomes in NSCLC. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 748 KiB  
Review
Management of MET-Driven Resistance to Osimertinib in EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
by Panagiotis Agisilaos Angelopoulos, Antonio Passaro, Ilaria Attili, Pamela Trillo Aliaga, Carla Corvaja, Gianluca Spitaleri, Elena Battaiotto, Ester Del Signore, Giuseppe Curigliano and Filippo de Marinis
Genes 2025, 16(7), 772; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16070772 - 30 Jun 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 849
Abstract
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations occur in approximately 10–20% of Caucasian and up to 50% of Asian patients with oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Most frequently, alterations include exon 19 deletions and exon 21 L858R mutations, which confer sensitivity [...] Read more.
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations occur in approximately 10–20% of Caucasian and up to 50% of Asian patients with oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Most frequently, alterations include exon 19 deletions and exon 21 L858R mutations, which confer sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). In the last decade, the third-generation EGFR-TKI osimertinib has represented the first-line standard of care for EGFR-mutant NSCLC. However, the development of acquired mechanisms of resistance significantly impacts long-term outcomes and represents a major therapeutic challenge. The mesenchymal–epithelial transition (MET) gene amplification and MET protein overexpression have emerged as prominent EGFR-independent (off-target) resistance mechanisms, detected in approximately 25% of osimertinib-resistant NSCLC. Noteworthy, variability in diagnostic thresholds, which differ between fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms, complicates its interpretation and clinical applicability. To address MET-driven resistance, several therapeutic strategies have been explored, including MET-TKIs, antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs), and bispecific monoclonal antibodies, and dual EGFR/MET inhibition has emerged as the most promising strategy. In this context, the bispecific EGFR/MET antibody amivantamab has demonstrated encouraging efficacy, regardless of MET alterations. Furthermore, the combination of the ADC telisotuzumab vedotin and osimertinib has been associated with activity in EGFR-mutant, c-MET protein-overexpressing, osimertinib-resistant NSCLC. Of note, several novel agents and combinations are currently under clinical development. The success of these targeted approaches relies on tissue re-biopsy at progression and accurate molecular profiling. Yet, tumor heterogeneity and procedural limitations may challenge the feasibility of re-biopsy, making biomarker-agnostic strategies viable alternatives. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Human Genomics and Genetic Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 934 KiB  
Review
The Role of Eosinophils, Eosinophil-Related Cytokines and AI in Predicting Immunotherapy Efficacy in NSCLC
by Fausto Omero, Desirèe Speranza, Giuseppe Murdaca, Mariacarmela Cavaleri, Mariapia Marafioti, Vincenzo Cianci, Massimiliano Berretta, Marco Casciaro, Sebastiano Gangemi and Mariacarmela Santarpia
Biomolecules 2025, 15(4), 491; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15040491 - 27 Mar 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1747
Abstract
Immunotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy are standard treatments for non-oncogene-addicted advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently, a limited number of biomarkers, including programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, microsatellite instability (MSI), and tumor mutational burden (TMB), are used in clinical practice to predict benefits from [...] Read more.
Immunotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy are standard treatments for non-oncogene-addicted advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently, a limited number of biomarkers, including programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, microsatellite instability (MSI), and tumor mutational burden (TMB), are used in clinical practice to predict benefits from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). It is therefore necessary to search for novel biomarkers that could be helpful to identify patients who respond to immunotherapy. In this context, research efforts are focusing on different cells and mechanisms involved in anti-tumor immune response. Herein, we provide un updated literature review on the role of eosinophils in cancer development and immune response, and the functions of some cytokines, including IL-31 and IL-33, in eosinophil activation. We discuss available data demonstrating a correlation between eosinophils and clinical outcomes of ICIs in lung cancer. In this context, we underscore the role of absolute eosinophil count (AEC) and tumor-associated tissue eosinophilia (TATE) as promising biomarkers able to predict the efficacy and toxicities from immunotherapy. The role of eosinophils and cytokines in NSCLC, treated with ICIs, is not yet fully understood, and further research may be crucial to determine their role as biomarkers of response. Artificial intelligence, through the analysis of big data, could be exploited in the future to elucidate the role of eosinophils and cytokines in lung cancer. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in Molecular Biomarkers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 2845 KiB  
Article
Immunological Network Signature of Naïve Non-Oncogene-Addicted Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Anti-PD1 Therapy: A Pilot Study
by Pasquale Sibilio, Ilaria Grazia Zizzari, Alain Gelibter, Marco Siringo, Lucrezia Tuosto, Angelica Pace, Angela Asquino, Flavio Valentino, Arianna Sabatini, Manuela Petti, Filippo Bellati, Daniele Santini, Marianna Nuti, Lorenzo Farina, Aurelia Rughetti and Chiara Napoletano
Cancers 2025, 17(6), 922; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17060922 - 8 Mar 2025
Viewed by 1304
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients without gene driver mutations receive anti-PD1 treatments either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy based on PD-L1 expression in tumor tissue. Anti-PD1 antibodies target various immune system components, perturbing the balance between immune cells and [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients without gene driver mutations receive anti-PD1 treatments either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy based on PD-L1 expression in tumor tissue. Anti-PD1 antibodies target various immune system components, perturbing the balance between immune cells and soluble factors. In this study, we identified the immune signatures of NSCLC patients associated with different clinical outcomes through network analysis. Methods: Twenty-seven metastatic NSCLC patients were assessed at baseline for the levels of circulating CD137+ T cells (total, CD4+, and CD8+) via cytofluorimetry, along with 14 soluble checkpoints and 20 cytokines through Luminex analysis. Hierarchical clustering and connectivity heatmaps were executed, analyzing the response to therapy (R vs. NR), performance status (PS = 0 vs. PS > 0), and overall survival (OS < 3 months vs. OS > 3 months). Results: The clustering of immune checkpoints revealed three groups with a significant differential proportion of six checkpoints between patients with PS = 0 and PS > 0 (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, significant pairwise correlations among immune factors evaluated in R were compared to the lack of significant correlations among the same immune factors in NR patients and vice versa. These comparisons were conducted for patients with PS = 0 vs. PS > 0 and OS < 3 months vs. OS > 3 months. The results indicated that NR with PS > 0 and OS ≤ 3 months exhibited an inflammatory-specific signature compared to the contrasting clinical conditions characterized by a checkpoint molecule-based network (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Identifying various connectivity immune profiles linked to response to therapy, PS, and survival in NSCLC patients represents significant findings that can optimize therapeutic choices. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Biomarkers in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC))
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1095 KiB  
Review
Perioperative Chemo-Immunotherapy in Non-Oncogene-Addicted Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Italian Expert Panel Meeting
by Filippo de Marinis, Andrea Ardizzoni, Ilaria Attili, Laura Bonanno, Emilio Bria, Diego Luigi Cortinovis, Stefano Margaritora, Francesca Mazzoni, Edoardo Mercadante, Alessandro Morabito, Francesco Petrella, Federico Rea, Rosario Salvi, Piergiorgio Solli, Lorenzo Spaggiari, Luca Voltolini and Cesare Gridelli
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(2), 110; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32020110 - 14 Feb 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2516
Abstract
Background: Immunotherapy (IO)-based strategies have been demonstrated to significantly prolong survival in the perioperative setting of non-oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The adoption of such strategies in clinical practice depends on heterogeneous regulatory approvals and on the agreement between medical oncologists and [...] Read more.
Background: Immunotherapy (IO)-based strategies have been demonstrated to significantly prolong survival in the perioperative setting of non-oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The adoption of such strategies in clinical practice depends on heterogeneous regulatory approvals and on the agreement between medical oncologists and thoracic surgeons on patients’ selection. Methods: An Expert Panel Meeting of medical oncologists and thoracic surgeons was held virtually by the Italian Association of Thoracic Oncology (AIOT) to discuss results of pivotal clinical trials with perioperative chemo-immunotherapy and reach agreement on open issues for the topic, formulating specific statements based on initially proposed discussion questions. Results: Overall, panelists found agreement on seven statements. With regard to tissue and biomarker analysis, the role of increasing PD-L1 expression in predicting IO efficacy was recognized, whereas ctDNA and pCR were mainly attributed a prognostic role, in the absence of dedicated studies. The panelists acknowledged direct relationship between the benefit of neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy approaches and the local burden of disease/mediastinal node involvement, supporting the inclusion of these factors, together with PD-L1, in selecting upfront surgery or induction treatment. The panelists agreed that the current literature data do not answer the issue of assessing the role of the adjuvant phase within a perioperative treatment strategy. Surgical considerations on the role of pneumonectomy and other approaches were also discussed. Conclusions: This experience highlights the importance of a synergistic approach between oncologists and surgeons to leverage the unmet needs in translating results of IO-perioperative clinical trials into clinical practice in patients with resectable NSCLC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Thoracic Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 781 KiB  
Review
Oligometastatic NSCLC: Current Perspectives and Future Challenges
by Sara Torresan, Jacopo Costa, Carol Zanchetta, Lorenzo De Marchi, Simona Rizzato and Francesco Cortiula
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(2), 75; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32020075 - 29 Jan 2025
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3028
Abstract
Oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a separate entity with a different biology and prognosis compared to stage IV NSCLC. Challenges range from the very definition of oligometastatic disease to the timing and techniques of local treatments, and their benefit in prolonging [...] Read more.
Oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a separate entity with a different biology and prognosis compared to stage IV NSCLC. Challenges range from the very definition of oligometastatic disease to the timing and techniques of local treatments, and their benefit in prolonging patient survival. Most of the international consensus and guidelines agree on the need for shared criteria, such as appropriate stadiation and even tissue biopsy if needed, in order to select patients that could really benefit from personalised strategies. Multidisciplinary evaluation is crucial in order to define if every lesion is amenable to radical local treatment, which appears to be the most important criterion across different guidelines. A distinction must be made depending on the time of oligo-disease detection, separating de novo oligometastatic disease from oligorecurrence, oligoprogression and oligoresidual disease. These separate entities imply a different biology and prognosis, and treatment strategies consequently must be tailored. Locoregional approaches are therefore often contemplated in order to ensure the best outcome for the patient. In non-oncogene-addicted disease, the advent of immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) allows physicians to take into consideration consolidative treatments, but timing, technique and subsequent systemic treatment remain open issues. In oncogene-addicted NSCLC, local treatments are nowadays preferably reserved to cases of oligoprogression, but the advent of new, more potent drugs might challenge that. In this review, we summarised the current knowledge, consensuses and data from retrospective and prospective trials, with the aim of shedding some light on the topic and emphasising the unmet clinical need. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 928 KiB  
Article
Soluble PD-L1 and Serum Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-B May Independently Predict Prognosis in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Pembrolizumab
by Eleni Kokkotou, Dimitra Grapsa, Anna Papadopoulou, Stylianos Gaitanakis, Petros Bakakos, Garyfallia Poulakou, Paraskevi Moutsatsou and Konstantinos Syrigos
Cancers 2025, 17(3), 421; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17030421 - 27 Jan 2025
Viewed by 1421
Abstract
Background: Previous preclinical data have shown that the dynamic cross-talk between abnormal tumor vasculature and immune cell factors in the tumor microenvironment may exert a critical role in the progression and treatment resistance of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the clinical setting, [...] Read more.
Background: Previous preclinical data have shown that the dynamic cross-talk between abnormal tumor vasculature and immune cell factors in the tumor microenvironment may exert a critical role in the progression and treatment resistance of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the clinical setting, a variety of blood-based angiogenesis- and immune-related factors are being increasingly investigated as potential biomarkers of prognosis or treatment response in immunotherapy-treated NSCLC. We herein aimed to evaluate the clinical relevance of the peripheral blood levels of vascular endothelial growth factor-A and -B (VEGF-A and VEGF-B, respectively), soluble programmed cell death-1 (sPD-1), and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (sPD-L1) in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Methods: Consecutive patients with advanced-stage, non-oncogene-addicted NSCLC, eligible to receive ICIs at the Oncology Unit of Sotiria Athens General Hospital, were prospectively recruited. A group of sex- and age-matched healthy controls was also enrolled for the evaluation of the potential diagnostic significance of the examined biomarkers. Serum levels of all biomarkers were measured using ELISA, both before and after treatment, and were correlated with standard clinicopathological features of patients, treatment response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 55 patients and 16 healthy controls were included in the final analysis. The mean age of patients and controls was 66.5 years (SD = 8.0 years) and 65.4 years (SD = 9.1 years), respectively. The majority of patients (65.5%) received pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy, while the remaining patients received pembrolizumab monotherapy. ROC curve analysis showed that VEGFB and sPD-1 were the only markers with a significant diagnostic value. Higher pre-treatment values of sPD-L1 (HR = 1.68; p = 0.040) and sPD-1 (HR = 10.96; p = 0.037) as well as higher post-treatment values of VEGF-B (HR = 2.99; p = 0.049) were all significantly associated with a reduced OS in univariate Cox regression analysis. The adverse prognostic significance of higher pre-treatment values of sPD-L1 (HR = 2.10; p = 0.014) and higher post-treatment values of VEGFB (HR = 3.37; p = 0.032) was further confirmed in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Our study results suggest that serum levels of sPD-L1 and VEGF-B may independently predict prognosis in ICI-treated advanced-stage NSCLC. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 989 KiB  
Systematic Review
Treatment Options for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer After Failure of Previous Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Chemotherapy: Meta-Analysis of Five Randomized Controlled Trials
by Andrea Messori, Andrea Ossato, Lorenzo Gasperoni, Luna Del Bono, Alessandro Inno and Vera Damuzzo
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(1), 46; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32010046 - 17 Jan 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1904
Abstract
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), either alone or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy, are effective in the first-line treatment of metastatic, non-oncogene-addicted, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, when NSCLC patients progress, the efficacy of available treatment options is limited. Methods: We undertook [...] Read more.
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), either alone or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy, are effective in the first-line treatment of metastatic, non-oncogene-addicted, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, when NSCLC patients progress, the efficacy of available treatment options is limited. Methods: We undertook a meta-analysis that compared combination regimens with the current standard of care. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included (endpoint, overall survival [OS]). Our analysis used an artificial intelligence software program that reconstructs individual patient data from Kaplan–Meier curves. Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was the main parameter. Heterogeneity was based on Wald’s test and likelihood ratio test. Results: Five RCTs were included, whose experimental arms included five different combinations. In our analysis, these combination regimes showed no OS benefit compared to chemotherapy (HR = 1.066, 95%CI, 0.9311 to 1.221; p = 0.35). Among the five control arms, cross-trial heterogeneity was remarkably low (likelihood ratio test = 3.76 on 4 df, p = 0.40; Wald test = 3.83 on 4 df, p = 0.40. Discussion: In conclusion, five new second-line combination treatments for patients with NSCLC were not found to determine any benefit in terms of OS in comparison with the current standard of care. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Thoracic Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 796 KiB  
Review
Immunotherapy in Oncogene-Addicted NSCLC: Evidence and Therapeutic Approaches
by Lorenzo Foffano, Elisa Bertoli, Martina Bortolot, Sara Torresan, Elisa De Carlo, Brigida Stanzione, Alessandro Del Conte, Fabio Puglisi, Michele Spina and Alessandra Bearz
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(2), 583; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26020583 - 11 Jan 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1967
Abstract
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. The discovery of specific driver mutations has revolutionized the treatment landscape of oncogene-addicted NSCLC through targeted therapies, significantly improving patient outcomes. However, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated limited effectiveness [...] Read more.
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. The discovery of specific driver mutations has revolutionized the treatment landscape of oncogene-addicted NSCLC through targeted therapies, significantly improving patient outcomes. However, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated limited effectiveness in this context. Emerging evidence, though, reveals significant heterogeneity among different driver mutation subgroups, suggesting that certain patient subsets may benefit from ICIs, particularly when combined with other therapeutic modalities. In this review, we comprehensively examine the current evidence on the efficacy of immunotherapy in oncogene-addicted NSCLC. By analyzing recent clinical trials and preclinical studies, along with an overview of mechanisms that may reduce immunotherapy efficacy, we explored potential strategies to address these challenges, to provide insights that could optimize immunotherapy approaches and integrate them effectively into the treatment algorithm for oncogene-addicted NSCLC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 406 KiB  
Review
Matters of the Heart: Cardiotoxicity Related to Target Therapy in Oncogene-Addicted Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
by Sara Torresan, Martina Bortolot, Elisa De Carlo, Elisa Bertoli, Brigida Stanzione, Alessandro Del Conte, Michele Spina and Alessandra Bearz
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(2), 554; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26020554 - 10 Jan 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2336
Abstract
The treatment of Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) has been revolutionised by the introduction of targeted therapies. With the improvement of response and frequently of overall survival, however, a whole new set of adverse events emerged. In fact, due to the peculiar [...] Read more.
The treatment of Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) has been revolutionised by the introduction of targeted therapies. With the improvement of response and frequently of overall survival, however, a whole new set of adverse events emerged. In fact, due to the peculiar mechanism of action of each one of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors and other targeted therapies, every drug has its own specific safety profile. In addition, this safety profile could not fully emerge from clinical trials data, as patients in clinical practice usually have more comorbidities and frailties. Cardiotoxicity is a well-known and established adverse event of anti-cancer therapies. However, only recently it has become a central topic for targeted therapies in NSCLC, due to the unknown real range and frequency. Management of this toxicity begins with prevention, and must balance the need of continuing an effective anticancer treatment versus low risk of even fatal events and the preservation of long-term quality of life. The aim of this review is to summarise the current knowledge focusing on currently used targeted therapies in NSCLC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Oncology)
15 pages, 2498 KiB  
Article
Exploring Genomic Biomarkers for Pembrolizumab Response: A Real-World Approach and Patient Similarity Network Analysis Reveal DNA Response and Repair Gene Mutations as a Signature
by Marco Filetti, Mario Occhipinti, Alessio Cirillo, Fabio Scirocchi, Alessio Ugolini, Raffaele Giusti, Pasquale Lombardi, Gennaro Daniele, Andrea Botticelli, Giuseppe Lo Russo, Filippo De Braud, Paolo Marchetti, Marianna Nuti, Elisabetta Ferretti, Lorenzo Farina, Aurelia Rughetti and Manuela Petti
Cancers 2024, 16(23), 3955; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16233955 - 26 Nov 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1285
Abstract
Purpose: Single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitor (IO) therapy is the standard for non-oncogene-addicted advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) with PD-L1 tumor proportion score ≥ 50%. Smoking-induced harm generates high tumor mutation burden (H-TMB) in smoking patients (S-pts), while never-smoking patients (NS-pts) typically [...] Read more.
Purpose: Single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitor (IO) therapy is the standard for non-oncogene-addicted advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) with PD-L1 tumor proportion score ≥ 50%. Smoking-induced harm generates high tumor mutation burden (H-TMB) in smoking patients (S-pts), while never-smoking patients (NS-pts) typically have low TMB (L-TMB) and are unresponsive to IO. However, the molecular characterization of NS-pts with H-TMB remains unclear. Experimental design: Clinical data of 142 aNSCLC patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50% treated with first line pembrolizumab were retrospectively collected. Next-generation sequencing was performed using the FoundationOne®CDx assay to correlate genomic alterations with clinical characteristics and response outcomes. Detected mutations were classified into eleven main pathways and enrichment analysis identified patient subgroups based on mutated pathways. Additionally, a patient similarity network was constructed to analyze molecular characterization. Results were validated using data from 853 aNSCLC patients in POPLAR and OAK trials. Results: Among the patients, S-pts had higher TMB than NS-pts. Interestingly, 11 (8%) NS-pts exhibited H-TMB and were enriched in β-catenin/Wnt and DDR pathway mutations. DDR pathway mutations were confirmed to be enriched in NS-pts with H-TMB using data from POPLAR and OAK trials. In the real-world cohort, the NS/H-TMB subgroup with DDR pathway mutations demonstrated improved IO outcome. Patient similarity network analysis confirmed the clustering of NS/H-TMB patients with DDR mutations and their association with improved overall survival in both the real-world cohort and the trials. Conclusions: The DDR signature has a potential role as an additional generator of H-TMB in NS-pts. This subgroup of IO-responsive NS-pts may have better prognosis. Our findings suggest that DDR-based mutational profiling may help identify NS-pts who could benefit from IO therapy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 8111 KiB  
Article
Combined Therapeutic Strategies Based on the Inhibition of Non-Oncogene Addiction to Improve Tumor Response in EGFR- and KRAS-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
by Luisa Amato, Daniela Omodei, Caterina De Rosa, Annalisa Ariano, Sara Capaldo, Camilla Carmela Tufano, Rossella Buono, Cristina Terlizzi, Anna Nardelli, Vitale Del Vecchio, Rosanna Palumbo, Concetta Tuccillo, Floriana Morgillo, Federica Papaccio, Virginia Tirino, Francesca Iommelli, Carminia Maria Della Corte and Viviana De Rosa
Cancers 2024, 16(23), 3941; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16233941 - 25 Nov 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1711
Abstract
Background: Oncogene-driven NSCLC is usually treated with targeted therapies using tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) to inhibit oncogene downstream signaling pathways, affecting tumor survival and proliferation. EGFR- and KRAS-mutant NSCLCs are the most represented subtypes, and they are treated in clinical practice with oncogene-targeting [...] Read more.
Background: Oncogene-driven NSCLC is usually treated with targeted therapies using tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) to inhibit oncogene downstream signaling pathways, affecting tumor survival and proliferation. EGFR- and KRAS-mutant NSCLCs are the most represented subtypes, and they are treated in clinical practice with oncogene-targeting drugs in the first and second line, respectively. Unfortunately, the development of oncogene-independent resistant clones limits TKI efficacy. Here, we used non-oncogene addiction (NOA) as an innovative therapeutic strategy to target other essential proteins that support changes in tumor phenotype. Specifically, we tested, for the first time, a combination of inhibitors, namely ATR, involved in DNA damage response, and pyruvate dehydrogenase kinases (PDKs), involved in energy metabolism. Methods: Sensitive PC9 and the corresponding EGFR-TKI-resistant PC9/OR, EGFR-mutant H1975, and KRAS-mutant A549 NSCLC cells, were treated with TKIs (osimertinib and selumetinib, respectively). In parallel, cells were exposed to two combination regimens: one using the TKI with an ATR inhibitor and the other one combining the two selected NOA inhibitors (ATR inhibitor, M4344; and PDK inhibitor, DCA). Results: The effect of these two combined approaches, compared to TKI alone, produced similar results in terms of cell proliferation, cell death, and migration. Thus, depending on tumor biology, selecting between the proposed therapeutic strategies will be different, to maximize tumor response. Conclusions: The major translational relevance of this study is to exploit new targets for the development of innovative and improved therapeutic strategies with NOA drugs, over combinations including target genes within the oncogene pathway, to overcome resistance to TKI therapies in patients with NSCLC who are oncogene-addicted. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 742 KiB  
Review
Proteolysis Targeting Chimera Agents (PROTACs): New Hope for Overcoming the Resistance Mechanisms in Oncogene-Addicted Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
by Nicoletta Cordani, Daniele Nova, Luca Sala, Maria Ida Abbate, Francesca Colonese, Diego Luigi Cortinovis and Stefania Canova
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(20), 11214; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252011214 - 18 Oct 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3339
Abstract
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a disease with a poor prognosis despite the advances in therapies. NSCLC with actionable oncogenic alterations represent a subgroup of diseases for which tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have shown relevant and robust impact on prognosis, both in [...] Read more.
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a disease with a poor prognosis despite the advances in therapies. NSCLC with actionable oncogenic alterations represent a subgroup of diseases for which tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have shown relevant and robust impact on prognosis, both in early and advanced stages. While the introduction of powerful TKIs increases the ratio of potentially curable patients, the disease does develop resistance over time through either secondary mutations or bypass activating tracks. Therefore, new treatment strategies are being developed to either overcome this inevitable resistance or to prevent it, and proteolysis targeting chimera agents (PROTACs) are among them. They consist of two linked molecules that bind to a target protein and an E3 ubiquitin ligase that causes ubiquitination and degradation of proteins of interest. In this paper, we review the rationale for PROTAC therapy and the current development of PROTACs for oncogene-addicted lung cancer. Moreover, we critically analyze the strengths and limitations of this promising technique that may help pave the way for future perspectives. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 520 KiB  
Article
The Association of Immune-Related Adverse Events with the Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Previously Treated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Single-Center Experience
by Filip Marković, Mihailo Stjepanović, Natalija Samardžić and Milica Kontić
Cancers 2024, 16(17), 2995; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16172995 - 28 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1427
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are pivotal in managing metastatic non-oncogene addicted non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). They have unique toxicities known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Previous studies have linked irAEs during atezolizumab-based first-line treatments in advanced NSCLC with improved outcomes. This study explored [...] Read more.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are pivotal in managing metastatic non-oncogene addicted non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). They have unique toxicities known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Previous studies have linked irAEs during atezolizumab-based first-line treatments in advanced NSCLC with improved outcomes. This study explored the association between irAEs and the efficacy of atezolizumab in advanced NSCLC patients who had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy. The study involved 105 advanced NSCLC patients who received atezolizumab monotherapy after progressing on at least one line of platinum-based chemotherapy from a single academic institution in Serbia. Data were obtained from a hospital lung cancer registry. Among the participants, 63.8% were male, with the majority being current (53.3%) or former smokers (37.1%). About half had a good performance status (ECOG PS 0–1) at the start of atezolizumab treatment. irAEs occurred in 23 patients (21.9%). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was significantly longer for patients with irAEs (13.03 months) compared to those without (3.4 months) (HR 0.365 [95% CI, 0.195–0.681], p = 0.002). irAEs and ECOG PS 0–1 were predictors of longer mPFS, with irAEs being more common in patients with good performance status (p = 0.01). irAEs were linked to improved mPFS in NSCLC patients treated with atezolizumab after multiple lines of platinum-based chemotherapy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 3016 KiB  
Article
Adiponectin Receptor Agonist AdipoRon Inhibits Proliferation and Drives Glycolytic Dependence in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Cells
by Sanober Kafeel, Angela Ragone, Alessia Salzillo, Giuseppina Palmiero, Silvio Naviglio and Luigi Sapio
Cancers 2024, 16(15), 2633; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16152633 - 24 Jul 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1915
Abstract
Despite the countless therapeutic advances achieved over the years, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. To this primacy contribute both non-oncogene addicted and advanced NSCLCs, in which conventional therapies are only partially effective. The adiponectin receptor agonist [...] Read more.
Despite the countless therapeutic advances achieved over the years, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. To this primacy contribute both non-oncogene addicted and advanced NSCLCs, in which conventional therapies are only partially effective. The adiponectin receptor agonist AdipoRon has revealed antiproliferative action in different cancers, including osteosarcoma and pancreatic cancer. Herein, we investigated its potential anticancer role in NSCLC for the first time. We proved that AdipoRon strongly inhibits viability, growth and colony formation in H1299 and A549 NSCLC cells, mainly through a slowdown in cell cycle progression. Along with the biological behaviors, a metabolic switching was observed after AdipoRon administration in NSCLC cells, consisting of higher glucose consumption and lactate accumulation. Remarkably, both 2-Deoxy Glucose and Oxamate glycolytic-interfering agents greatly enhanced AdipoRon’s antiproliferative features. As a master regulator of cell metabolism, AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) was activated by AdipoRon. Notably, the ablation of AdipoRon-induced AMPK phosphorylation by Compound-C significantly counteracted its effectiveness. However, the engagement of other pathways should be investigated afterwards. With a focus on NSCLC, our findings further support the ability of AdipoRon in acting as an anticancer molecule, driving its endorsement as a future candidate in NSCLC therapy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop