Next Article in Journal
Proteasome- and Calpain-Mediated Proteolysis, but Not Autophagy, Is Required for Leucine-Induced Protein Synthesis in C2C12 Myotubes
Previous Article in Journal
Publisher’s Note: Physiologia—A New Open Access Journal
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Physiologia
Volume 1
Issue 1
10.3390/physiologia1010004
physiologia-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Acute CrossFit® Workout Session Impacts Blood Redox Marker Modulation

by
Manoel Rios
1,*,
Tamires Macan
2,3,
Jelena Stevanović-Silva
1,
Kamonrat Nhusawi
4,
Ricardo J. Fernandes
5,
Jorge Beleza
1,
António Ascensão
1 and
José Magalhães
1
1
Laboratory of Metabolism and Exercise, Faculty of Sport, Research Centre in Physical Activity, Health and Leisure, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
2
Translational Biomedicine Laboratory, Graduate Program of Health Sciences, University of Southern Santa Catarina, Criciúma 88806-000, Brazil
3
Department of Environmental Health, National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge, 4000-053 Porto, Portugal
4
Sport Science Program, Department of Fundamental Education, Faculty of Education, Silpakorn University, Nakhon Pathom 73000, Thailand
5
Center of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport and Porto Biomechanics Laboratory, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Physiologia 2021, 1(1), 13-21; https://doi.org/10.3390/physiologia1010004
Submission received: 15 September 2021 / Revised: 26 October 2021 / Accepted: 27 October 2021 / Published: 1 November 2021
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
We aimed to analyze the impact of a single CrossFit® session “workout of the day” (WOD) on plasma redox. Ten CrossFit®-experienced subjects volunteered to participate. Oxygen uptake (VO2) during WOD and treadmill running (TR), performed at the same VO2 and time as WOD, were continuously monitored. Venous blood samples were collected before (baseline—BL) and after both exercises, for lactate concentration, total antioxidant capacity, thiol content, and DNA damage measurements. Total antioxidant capacity decreased after both exercises (WOD and TR) vs. BL, with no differences between exercises. Thiol content increased after WOD; however, no differences between exercises were observed. DNA damage increased after both WOD and TR, although more exuberantly after WOD than TR. Much higher lactate levels were detected in WOD compared to TR. Our findings suggest that WOD induces an increased condition of oxidative injury and affects total antioxidant capacity in experienced CrossFit® performers.

1. Introduction

Extreme physical fitness programs have increased in popularity, especially CrossFit® training [1]. CrossFit® workouts comprise functional movements, performed at high-intensity (the so-called “workout of the day”—WOD [2]) and are typically composed of gymnastic-type exercises (involving body weight), “metabolic”-related conditioning, and weightlifting [2]. These exercise routines are performed in a circuit format, with short or no resting periods [2]. The goal is to finish the WOD in the “best possible time” (rounds for time) or to achieve the highest possible number of repetitions/rounds over periods of 10–20 min (as many rounds as possible) [3].
Although similar to circuit training, CrossFit® workouts do not typically provide structured resting periods, which entails participants to significantly elevate physical and physiological stress levels [4]. In fact, CrossFit® training programs could jeopardize the concept of wellness [5], eventually triggering significant elevation of several stress mediators in the plasma, including those related to redox state [6]. Like many other exercise-induced stress conditions, it is expectable that when facing increased oxidative stress, practitioners adapt to these homeostatic alterations by enhancing the expression of antioxidants, therefore creating a redox balance that aims at mitigating possible transient increased oxidative stress induced by exercise in some cellular compartments [7,8,9].
Nevertheless, depending on the specific features of the used exercise programs, namely its mechanical and/or metabolic exuberant prevalence [10,11,12,13] and/or the established relationship between exercise and recovery routines, an exacerbated oxidative stress condition may result. In fact, the augmented levels of produced oxidized molecules may overwhelm the ability of the antioxidant system and oxidative injury might occur at different levels of cellular organization, including damage to DNA, proteins and lipids [14,15,16]. Among the different methods to evaluate the impact of oxidant production under exercise conditions, the ability of the endogenous thiol-related glutathione and thioredoxin systems to counterbalance the potential enhanced oxidative stress [17], as well as the DNA damage [9,18] have been extensively used.
As previously reported by our group [10,11,12,19,20] and others [21,22,23], the prevalence of distinct metabolic and mechanical demands of a certain sport modality naturally triggers different main contributor sources of reactive oxygen species (ROS) during and after exercise. Actually, both expected high cardiovascular and metabolic load inferred, for example, by relatively long periods performing at elevated percentages of maximal heart rate (HRmax) and the simultaneous elevated neuromuscular demands in CrossFit® training sessions could potentially target several distinct sources and mechanisms associated with the possible increased oxidative stress condition. In addition, given the known regulatory role of the reactive oxygen and ROS in the cellular physiology through its signaling action, it is of utmost importance to ascertain whether a typical WOD induces alterations in redox-related mediators, a subject so far uncovered by the literature and the main goal of the present study.
Furthermore, is not yet known whether intense neuromuscular stimuli-induced ischemia/reperfusion-like events characterizing CrossFit® are decisive contributors to the possible increased redox changes associated with this modality. Considering that oxygen uptake (VO2) at mitochondrial level is known to be associated with electron leak from electron transport chain complexes, thus resulting in ROS generation, and that WOD comprises both intermittent high neuromuscular demanding actions possibly implicating xanthine dehydrogenase/oxidase (XDH/XO) derived mechanisms in ROS production.
Here, we analyzed the impact of both WOD and treadmill running (TR) sessions matched for mean WOD VO2 and duration on plasma redox markers. Considering the different mechanical and metabolic involvement of both exercise modalities, we hypothesized that intensive CrossFit® exercises led to higher levels of oxidative stress when compared to running at similar VO2-related intensity and duration.

2. Results

Anthropometric and physiological characteristics of CrossFit® participants are presented in Table 1. The intensity of WOD and TR sessions measured as percentage of VO2 is presented in Figure 1. As can be depicted, during large part of the WOD and TR sessions VO2 was maintained elevated ranging values correspondent to vigorous intensity. The levels of total antioxidant capacity (AOC) significantly decreased from baseline (BL) to the end of the WOD and TR sessions (BL: 256.5 ± 28.7 vs. WOD: 211.7 ± 29.1 and TR: 223.9 ± 41 μM, respectively; p < 0.05) (Figure 2, left panel), with no differences between exercises. Regarding the levels of total thiols, a significant increase from BL was observed only after the WOD (0.41 ± 0.04 and 0.38 ± 0.03 nmol TNB/mg protein; p < 0.05), while no differences were found between the two protocols (Figure 2, center panel). When compared to baseline values, DNA damage increased both after the WOD and TR sessions (2.5 ± 0.6 vs. 6.9 ± 2.5 and 4.3 ± 1.4%, respectively; p < 0.01); however, the CrossFit@ session induced higher levels of damage than those observed after the TR protocol (p < 0.05) (Figure 2, right panel). Furthermore, the CrossFit® session elicited higher mean heart rate (HR) (WOD:155 ± 6 vs. TR:129 ± 16 b min−1, p < 0.001), HRmax (WOD: 182 ± 5 vs. TR: 151 ± 12 b min−1, p < 0.001) and lactate concentration ([La-]) (WOD: 16.5 ± 3.6 vs. TR: 2.4 ± 3.4 mM, p < 0.001) values than those obtained in the TR session, although both protocols had the same duration and were performed at similar average VO2 (WOD: 25.9 ± 3.0 vs. TR: 26.8 ± 3.3 mL·kg1·min−1, respectively).

3. Discussion

The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of a single CrossFit® WOD session on plasma redox biomarkers. Additionally, a treadmill running session matched for the same duration and VO2 obtained during the WOD was considered in the experimental setup.
The results of our study suggest that the WOD session with the aforementioned characteristics promotes a more significant alteration on oxidative damage biomarkers and antioxidant capacity in the plasma and blood of CrossFit® performers, when compared to the correspondent 40 min running session.
The HR values observed during WOD vs. TR (155 ± 6 vs. 129 ± 16 b min−1) as well as the characteristics of many typical CrossFit® movements performed during the WOD, particularly those involving intense muscular actions and of short duration interspersed with resting or less intense periods are typically associated, for instance, with decreased content of skeletal muscle adenine nucleotides, disruption of muscular calcium homeostasis, periods of ischemia followed by reperfusion. These are known as established conditions favoring the activation of the endothelial and muscular XDH/XO, resulting in additional ROS generation [10,24].
As an estimated 1–5% of the total VO2 results in the formation of the oxygen radical superoxide (O2−) [15,25] and given the high level of VO2 accompanying CrossFit® session (Table 2), it is not surprising that the biomarkers of oxidative stress and damage had increased [12,26] and circulating neutrophil-induced oxidative burst [27] can contribute to the observed blood oxidative stress and damage. The influence of eccentric exercise-mediating muscular damage-like events on the formation of ROS has also been reported [19,28].
Recently, it has been proposed that at least in some models of exercise, mitochondria are not as important source of ROS production during exercise as NADPH oxidases (NOX), being these last considered to be a major source of contraction-related ROS production and relevant mediators in redox-signaling and metabolism. It was suggested that lower intracellular pH that occurs during some muscle contraction turns mitochondria towards antioxidant rather than pro-oxidant state [29], as mitochondrial H2O2 consumption is pH sensitive, and it is higher in lower pH [30]. Both in vitro studies using NOX2 inhibitors [31,32] and in vivo exercise studies using NOX2 activity-deficient mice [33] support the relevance of NOX2 in ROS generation. Moreover, it was reported that skeletal muscle NOX2 activity increased after high-intensity interval training (HIIT) exercise, which might be interpreted as a required mechanism associated with HIIT adaptation related to antioxidant defense, glucose metabolism, and mitochondrial function [34].
Considering the specific physiological demands imposed by a WOD session, none of these potential sources should be ruled out in the current study. However, it is important to note that under the technical constrains of the present study, we cannot conclusively demonstrate a causal link between any of those potential sources and the increased plasma oxidative stress and damage found.
The results showed a decrease in plasma antioxidant capacity after performing both types of exercise (p < 0.05), despite no significant differences were observed between the two exercise protocols. Although studies reporting the acute and chronic effects of CrossFit® on antioxidant capacity are lacking, some have shown that single metabolic-based conditioning sessions based on CrossFit® can increase oxidative stress in a similar way to high-intensity exercise performed on a treadmill [35]. CrossFit® training, seen as a chronic stimulus, is part of a demanding fitness program as much as HIIT [1]. For example, an HIIT protocol, carried out for three weeks, resulted in a decrease in oxidative stress markers and a significant increase in antioxidant status, being these adaptations achieved after nine exercise sessions [36].
The authors suggested that these responses of the pro-oxidant and antioxidant balance with HIIT could be considered to be an additional beneficial response for this type of training program. Therefore, our aforementioned results suggest that the WOD performed by the participants in our study might had a more severe impact on the analyzed markers if they were untrained subjects, as well-trained individuals may develop favorable redox adaptations in a short period of time to cope with WOD-induced increased oxidative stress and damage [15,17]. In fact, Shing et al. [37] demonstrated that only three consecutive sessions of anaerobic training resulted in a significant decrease of oxidative stress markers and an increase in antioxidant status.
Such oxidative and redox adaptations in several tissues, which occur in a short period of time compared to traditional endurance training programs, boost organ and body defense capacities to deal with stressful conditions, and make this type of exercise attractive, not only for increasing physical performance levels, but also to mitigate disease risk factors or develop health-related biomarkers within the populations [9,38]. One should notice the important physiological role of ROS, as biomolecules that are very important in the activation of numerous signaling pathways involved in the increased cellular and sub-cellular defense capacity, including the antioxidant, thus justifying the systematic physical exercise practice [15,17,22], i.e., the moderate and systematic increase in the production of these species results in the activation of cascades of cell and sub-cellular signaling and transcription factors that are decisive in the biosynthesis of enzymes and other molecules with antioxidant potential [9,15].
Another important marker of oxidative stress, more specifically the oxidation of proteins and compounds containing sulfhydryl group (-SH), is the content of total thiols. The levels of this marker increased after the WOD protocol (p < 0.05) with no significant differences between the exercises. The -SH groups of proteins can be oxidized by free radicals, thus compromising the functioning of these proteins [16,39]. A possible explanation for our results would be the increase in stress proteins induced by exercise, as these proteins have the function of controlling cellular homeostasis, protecting against excessive oxidation. Additionally, as -SH content was measured in plasma and under acute exercise-induced oxidative stress and damage liver export reduced glutathione (GSH), an important tripeptide with antioxidant properties containing an -SH group, to the blood to cope with tissue (mainly delivered to skeletal muscles) redox challenges [15,24]. Therefore, we should not exclude that the observed (possibly transient) increased thiol content could have resulted from the possible increased GSH export from the liver after the intense WOD.
Intense exercise-induced oxidative stress leads to DNA damage [9,40]. The present results demonstrated a significant increase in the levels of DNA damage after both WOD and treadmill running sessions (p < 0.05). However, when compared to WOD, the levels of DNA damage observed after treadmill running were significantly lower. Although scarce, biomonitoring data of HIIT practitioners demonstrated greater DNA damage after a typical training session [41]. Other studies also reported that intense physical exercise training increase DNA strand breaks with resulting compromised stability [42,43].

4. Materials and Methods

The experimental protocol was approved by the host University ethical committee (CEFADE 21—2019) and followed the Declaration of Helsinki of the World Medical Association for research with humans. Before participation, subjects signed an informed consent and were familiarized with the WOD training session and corresponding experimental protocol. Subjects were instructed not to change their normal nutritional habits, to refrain from additional vitamin or antioxidant dietary supplementation and to abstain from exhaustive exercise for three weeks before data collection and during the experimental protocol period.
Ten subjects (6 men and 4 women), with more than two years of CrossFit® training experience, volunteered to take part in the current study (Table 1).
One week before the experiments, body composition was evaluated using Dual Energy X-Ray absorptiometry (Hologic, Model Discovery WI, Hamburg, Germany). Thereafter, the participants performed an incremental treadmill (Quasar-Med, Nussdorf, Germany) test until voluntary exhaustion to determine maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) and HRmax. Expired respiratory gas fractions were measured using an open circuit breath-by-breath (K4b2, Cosmed, Rome, Italy).
Immediately before and after the CrossFit® session, 5 mL venous blood samples were collected from the antecubital vein in anticoagulant tubes (EDTA-K3 GV0414, Iberlab, Porto, Portugal). For medium-throughput alkaline Comet assay [18], an aliquot of blood samples was cryopreserved an equal amount of 1:4 (v/v) mixture of DMSO and RPMI 1640, then stored in aliquots (200 μL each) at −80 °C until the day of analyze. Plasma was separated by centrifugation (CENCE L500, Hunan, China) at 3000× g for 10 min at 4 °C, aliquoted and frozen at −80 °C for later biochemical analysis.
Plasma AOC was spectrophotometrically measured using a commercial kit (BioQuoChem, KF-01-003, Madrid, Spain) and plasma content of total thiol groups were spectrophotometrically assessed at 412 nm [44]. Capillary blood samples were also collected (at the earlobe) before and immediately after the CrossFit® workout, and at 3, 5, and 7 min of the recovery period, for [La−] analysis (Lactate Pro2 analyzer, Arkay, Inc, Kyoto, Japan).
The CrossFit® WOD lasted 40 min and was divided into four blocks, each one including typical exercises performed in CrossFit® competitions (Table 2). Respiratory and pulmonary gas exchange data were measured breath-by-breath during the WOD session using a telemetric portable gas analyzer (K4b2, Cosmed, Rome, Italy) that was previously calibrated following the manufacturer instructions with gases of known concentrations (16% O2 and 5% CO2). HR was also continuously monitored during the entire WOD (Polar, Model FT1, Kempele, Finland).
One week after the WOD, the same participants went to the laboratory to perform a TR session. In this protocol, each subject was instructed to run for the time (40 min) and at a velocity equivalent to the mean oxygen consumption obtained during the CrossFit® WOD session. To authenticate running intensity, oxygen consumption was also continuously monitored during the running protocol, using the same metabolic equipment described above. We use the %VO2max range (e.g., 91~100% VO2max: Maximal, 64~90% VO2max: Vigorous, 46~63% VO2max: Moderate, 37~45% VO2max: Light) to categorize exercise intensity. Moreover, HR was continuously recorded, and maximal blood lactate concentration was assessed in the end of the running period, as described above. In accordance with the methodology used in the WOD protocol, blood samples were collected immediately before and after the treadmill running session.
The studied variables are presented as mean ± SD, with data normality evaluated by the Shapiro–Wilk test. As all the variables presented a normal distribution, an unpaired t-test was used comparing male and female characteristics. Repeated-measures ANOVA was used to establish whether total AOC, total thiols, and DNA damage data obtained after both sessions were significantly different from baseline results. Differences between WOD and TR regarding the mean VO2, HR, HRmax and [La−] values were assessed using a Student’s paired t-test. All tests were performed using GraphPad Prism 6 and the significance level was set at 5%.

5. Conclusions

In summary, our results suggest that a WOD session induces an increased condition of oxidative injury and affects the antioxidant capacity in experienced CrossFit® performers. We can also speculate that mitochondrial electron transport chain and the overall oxidative metabolism could not be considered the preferred source of ROS production during a CrossFit® WOD, being other mechanisms/sources, which may include XDH/XO, more plausible as relevant contributors to the observed redox alterations.

Practical Applications

Knowing the altered redox homeostasis in experimented CrossFit® performers after each WOD and given the central physiological role of ROS as signaling molecules essential for cellular adaptation to stress stimuli, including exercise training, caution should be recommended when complementary strategies, such as antioxidant supplementation, possibly masking training-induced adaptive redox-related alterations that ultimately lead to enhanced CrossFit® practitioners’ physical condition, are considered.

Author Contributions

M.R.: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing, Visualization. T.M.: Investigation, Writing—review and editing. J.S.-S.: Investigation, Writing—review and editing. K.N.: Investigation, Writing—review and editing. R.J.F.: Investigation, Writing—review and editing. J.B.: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing, Visualization. A.A.: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing—review and editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition. J.M.: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the EU’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (No.722619, FOIE GRAS; No.734719, mtFOIE GRAS) and by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) (UIDB/00617/2020-base; POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016690-PTDC/DTP-DES/7087/2014; POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016657-PTDC/DTP-DES/1082/2014), to JB PhD scholarship (SFRH/BD/129645/2017).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of CEFADE 21—2019.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Thompson, W.R. Worldwide survey of fitness trends for 2019. ACSMs Heal. Fit. J. 2018, 22, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Claudino, J.G.; Gabbett, T.J.; Bourgeois, F.; de Sá Souza, H.; Miranda, R.C.; Mezêncio, B.; Soncin, R.; Filho, C.A.C.; Bottaro, M.; Hernandez, A.J.; et al. CrossFit Overview: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Sports Med. Open 2018, 4, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Fernández, J.F.; Solana, R.S.; Moya, D.; Marin, J.M.S.; Ramón, M.M. Acute physiological responses during Crossfit® workouts. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 2015, 35, 114–124. [Google Scholar]
  4. Schlegel, P. CrossFit® Training Strategies from the Perspective of Concurrent Training: A Systematic Review. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2020, 19, 670. [Google Scholar]
  5. Murawska-Cialowicz, E.; Wojna, J.; Zuwala-Jagiello, J. Crossfit training changes brain-derived neurotrophic factor and irisin levels at rest, after wingate and progressive tests, and improves aerobic capacity and body composition of young physically active men and women. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2015, 66, 811–821. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Kliszczewicz, B.; Quindry, C.J.; Blessing, L.D.; Oliver, D.G.; Esco, R.M.; Taylor, J.K. Acute exercise and oxidative stress: CrossFit™ vs. treadmill bout. J. Hum. Kinet. 2015, 47, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Powers, S.K.; Jackson, M.J. Exercise-induced oxidative stress: Cellular mechanisms and impact on muscle force production. Physiol. Rev. 2008, 88, 1243–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Radak, Z.; Ishihara, K.; Tekus, E.; Varga, C.; Posa, A.; Balogh, L.; Boldogh, I.; Koltai, E. Exercise, oxidants, and antioxidants change the shape of the bell-shaped hormesis curve. Redox Biol. 2017, 12, 285–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Tryfidou, D.V.; McClean, C.; Nikolaidis, M.G. DNA damage following acute aerobic exercise: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2020, 50, 103–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Magalhães, J.; Ferreira, R.; Marques, F.; Olivera, E.; Soares, J.; Ascensao, A. Indoor climbing elicits plasma oxidative stress. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2007, 39, 955–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ascensão, A.; Ferreira, R.; Marques, F.; Oliveira, E.; Azevedo, V.; Soares, J.; Magalhães, J. Effect of off-road competitive motocross race on plasma oxidative stress and damage markers. Br. J. Sports Med. 2007, 41, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Ascensão, A.; Rebelo, A.; Oliveira, E.; Marques, F.; Pereira, L.; Magalhães, J. Biochemical impact of a soccer match—analysis of oxidative stress and muscle damage markers throughout recovery. Clin. Biochem. 2008, 41, 841–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cheng, A.J.; Jude, B.; Lanner, J.T. Intramuscular mechanisms of overtraining. Redox Biol. 2020, 35, 101480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kurutas, E.B. The importance of antioxidants which play the role in cellular response against oxidative/nitrosative stress: Current state. J. Nutr. 2015, 15, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Powers, S.K.; Deminice, R.; Ozdemir, M.; Yoshihara, T.; Bomkamp, M.P.; Hyatt, H. Exercise-induced oxidative stress: Friend or foe? J. Sport Health Sci. 2020, 9, 415–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Quan, H.; Koltai, E.; Suzuki, K.; Aguiar-Júnior, A.S.; Pinho, R.; Boldogh, I.; Berkes, I.; Radak, Z. Exercise, redox system and neurodegenerative diseases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2020, 1866, 165778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Radak, Z.; Zhao, Z.; Koltai, E.; Ohno, H.; Atalay, M. Oxygen consumption and usage during physical exercise: The balance between oxidative stress and ROS-dependent adaptive signaling. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2013, 18, 1208–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Singh, N.P.; McCoy, M.T.; Tice, R.R.; Schneider, E.L. A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp. Cell Res. 1988, 175, 184–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Magalhães, J.; Rebelo, A.; Oliveira, E.; Silva, J.R.; Marques, F.; Ascensão, A. Impact of Loughborough Intermittent Shuttle Test versus soccer match on physiological, biochemical and neuromuscular parameters. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2010, 108, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Silva, J.R.; Ascensão, A.; Marques, F.; Seabra, A.; Rebelo, A.; Magalhães, J. Neuromuscular function, hormonal and redox status and muscle damage of professional soccer players after a high-level competitive match. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2013, 113, 2193–2201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Pingitore, A.; Lima, G.P.P.; Mastorci, F.; Quinones, A.; Iervasi, G.; Vassalle, C. Exercise and oxidative stress: Potential effects of antioxidant dietary strategies in sports. Nutrition 2015, 31, 916–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Powers, S.K.; Radak, Z.; Ji, L.L. Exercise-induced oxidative stress: Past, present and future. J. Physiol. 2016, 594, 5081–5092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Sohail, M.U.; Al-Mansoori, L.; Al-Jaber, H. Assessment of Serum Cytokines and Oxidative Stress Markers in Elite Athletes Reveals Unique Profiles Associated With Different Sport Disciplines. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11, 600888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Halliwell, B.; Gutteridge, J.M.C. Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine, 5th ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  25. Fridovich, I. Superoxide radicals, superoxide dismutases and the aerobic lifestyle. J. Photochem. Photobiol. 1978, 28, 33–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pizzino, G.; Irrera, N.; Cucinotta, M. Oxidative stress: Harms and benefits for human health. Oxidative Med. Cell Longev. 2017, 2017, 8416763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Quindry, J.C.; Stone, W.L.; King, J.; Broeder, C.E. The effects of acute exercise on neutrophils and plasma oxidative stress. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2003, 35, 1139–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. He, F.; Chuang, C.C.; Zhou, T.; Sedlock, D.A.; Zuo, L. Redox correlation in muscle lengthening and immune response in eccentric exercise. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0208799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Henríquez-Olguín, C.; Boronat, S.; Cabello-Verrugio, C.; Jaimovich, E.; Hidalgo, E.; Jensen, T.E. The emerging roles of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase 2 in skeletal muscle redox signaling and metabolism. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2019, 31, 1371–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Banh, S.; Treberg, J.R. The pH sensitivity of H2O2 metabolism in skeletal muscle mitochondria. FEBS Lett. 2013, 587, 1799–1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Patwell, D.M.; McArdle, A.; Morgan, J.E.; Patridge, T.A.; Jackson, M.J. Release of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species from contracting skeletal muscle cells. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2004, 37, 1064–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Espinosa, A.; Leiva, A.; Peña, M.; Müller, M.; Debandi, A.; Hidalgo, C.; Carrasco, M.A.; Jaimovich, E. Myotube depolarization generates reactive oxygen species through NAD (P) H oxidase; ROS-elicited Ca2+ stimulates ERK, CREB, early genes. J. Cell. Physiol. 2006, 209, 379–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Henríquez-Olguin, C.; Knudsen, J.R.; Raun, S.H.; Li, Z.; Dalbram, E.; Treebak, J.T.; Sylow, L.; Holmdahl, R.; Richter, E.A.; Jaimovich, E.; et al. Cytosolic ROS production by NADPH oxidase 2 regulates muscle glucose uptake during exercise. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Henríquez-Olguín, C.; Renani, L.B.; Arab-Ceschia, L.; Raun, S.H.; Bhatia, A.; Li, Z.; Knudsen, J.R.; Holmdahl, R.; Jensen, T.E. Adaptations to high-intensity interval training in skeletal muscle require NADPH oxidase 2. Redox Biol. 2019, 24, 101188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kliszczewicz, B.M.; Esco, M.R.; Quindry, J.C.; Blessing, D.L.; Oliver, G.D.; Taylor, K.J.; Price, B.M. Autonomic responses to an acute bout of high-intensity body weight resistance exercise vs. treadmill running. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2016, 30, 1050–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bogdanis, G.C.; Stavrinou, P.; Fatouros, I.G.; Philippou, A.; Chatzinikolaou, A.; Draganidis, D.; Ermidis, G.; Maridaki, M. Short-term high-intensity interval exercise training attenuates oxidative stress responses and improves antioxidant status in healthy humans. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 61, 171–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Shing, C.M.; Peake, J.M.; Ahern, S.M.; Strobel, N.A.; Wilson, G.; Jenkins, D.G.; Coombes, J.S. The effect of consecutive days of exercise on markers of oxidative stress. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 2007, 32, 677–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nocella, C.; Cammisotto, V.; Pigozzi, F.; Borrione, P.; Fossati, C.; D’Amico, A.; Cangemi, R.; Peruzzi, M.; Gobbi, G.; Ettorre, E. Impairment between oxidant and antioxidant systems: Short-and long-term implications for athletes’ health. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Kolagal, V.; Karanam, S.A.; Dharmavarapu, P.K.; D’Souza, R.; Upadhya, S.; Kumar, V.; Kedage, V.; Muttigi, M.S.; Shetty, J.K.; Prakash, M. Determination of oxidative stress markers and their importance in early diagnosis of uremia-related complications. Indian J. Nephrol. 2009, 19, 8. [Google Scholar]
  40. Shigenaga, M.K.; Hagen, T.M.; Ames, B.N. Oxidative damage and mitochondrial decay in aging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 10771–10778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Ortiz-Franco, M.; Planells, E.; Quintero, B.; Acuña-Castroviejo, D.; Rusanova, I.; Escames, G.; Molina-López, J. Effect of melatonin supplementation on antioxidant status and DNA damage in high intensity trained athletes. Int. J. Sports Med. 2017, 38, 1117–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Palazzetti, S.; Richard, M.J.; Favier, A.; Margaritis, I. Overloaded training increases exercise-induced oxidative stress and damage. Can. J. Appl. Physiol. 2003, 28, 588–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Wagner, K.H.; Reichhold, S.; Neubauer, O. Impact of endurance and ultraendurance exercise on DNA damage. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2011, 1229, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Aksenov, M.Y.; Markesbery, W.R. Changes in thiol content and expression of glutathione redox system genes in the hippocampus and cerebellum in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci. Lett. 2001, 302, 141–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Physiologia 01 00004 g001 550
Figure 1. Mean values of the times sustained at relative intensity of VO2 (rounded to the nearest unit,%) obtained during WOD workouts and treadmill running.
Figure 1. Mean values of the times sustained at relative intensity of VO2 (rounded to the nearest unit,%) obtained during WOD workouts and treadmill running.
Physiologia 01 00004 g001
Physiologia 01 00004 g002 550
Figure 2. Effect of CrossFit® and treadmill running sessions on total antioxidant capacity, total thiol levels and DNA damage (left, center, and right panels). *,# different from baseline and WOD, respectively (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Effect of CrossFit® and treadmill running sessions on total antioxidant capacity, total thiol levels and DNA damage (left, center, and right panels). *,# different from baseline and WOD, respectively (p < 0.05).
Physiologia 01 00004 g002
Table
Table 1. Physical characteristics of the CrossFit® performers.
Table 1. Physical characteristics of the CrossFit® performers.
(n = 10)
Age (years)30.8 ± 5.6
Training experience (years)3.6 ± 0.2
Height (cm)169.5 ± 10.3
Weight (kg)73.5 ± 13
Body mass index (kg/m2)26 ± 2
Fat mass (%)19.9 ± 3.9
Lean Mass (kg)55 ± 12
Maximal oxygen uptake (mL·kg 1·min−1)44.9 ± 7.2
Maximal respiratory quotient1.1 ± 0.9
Maximal heart rate (b·min−1)181 ± 11
Data are mean standard deviation (SD)
Table
Table 2. Schematic representation of the CrossFit® WOD workouts.
Table 2. Schematic representation of the CrossFit® WOD workouts.
WorkoutsDurationRepetitionsRecoveryLoad (Men and Women)
Rowing ergometer4 minMaximum4 min----
Air bike4 minMaximum8 min----
Randy6 minMaximum8 min35 and 25 kg
Deadlift, toes to bar,
dumbbell thruster and
dumbbell walking lunges		6 min
circuit		10 each
exercise		----Deadlift (80 and 55 kg), dumbbell
thruster (30 and 20 kg) and dumbbell
walking lunges (30 and 20 kg)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rios, M.; Macan, T.; Stevanović-Silva, J.; Nhusawi, K.; Fernandes, R.J.; Beleza, J.; Ascensão, A.; Magalhães, J. Acute CrossFit® Workout Session Impacts Blood Redox Marker Modulation. Physiologia 2021, 1, 13-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/physiologia1010004

AMA Style

Rios M, Macan T, Stevanović-Silva J, Nhusawi K, Fernandes RJ, Beleza J, Ascensão A, Magalhães J. Acute CrossFit® Workout Session Impacts Blood Redox Marker Modulation. Physiologia. 2021; 1(1):13-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/physiologia1010004

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rios, Manoel, Tamires Macan, Jelena Stevanović-Silva, Kamonrat Nhusawi, Ricardo J. Fernandes, Jorge Beleza, António Ascensão, and José Magalhães. 2021. "Acute CrossFit® Workout Session Impacts Blood Redox Marker Modulation" Physiologia 1, no. 1: 13-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/physiologia1010004

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop