Next Article in Journal
High Thermal Stability of Enzyme-MOF Composites at 180 °C
Next Article in Special Issue
Biogenic Silver and Copper Nanoparticles: Potential Antifungal Agents in Rice and Wheat Crops
Previous Article in Journal
Expanding Heteroaromatic and 2-Aminosugar Chemical Space Accessible from the Biopolymer Chitin
Previous Article in Special Issue
Silver Ions Incorporation into Nanofibers for Enhanced hMSC Viability
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Antimicrobial and Mosquitocidal Activity of Green Magnesium Oxide Nanoparticles Synthesized by an Aqueous Peel Extract of Punica granatum

Chemistry 2023, 5(3), 2009-2024; https://doi.org/10.3390/chemistry5030136
by Amr Fouda 1,*, Khalid S. Alshallash 2,*, Mohammed I. Alghonaim 3, Ahmed M. Eid 1, Ahmed M. Alemam 1, Mohamed A. Awad 4 and Mohammed F. Hamza 5,6
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Chemistry 2023, 5(3), 2009-2024; https://doi.org/10.3390/chemistry5030136
Submission received: 25 July 2023 / Revised: 28 August 2023 / Accepted: 6 September 2023 / Published: 12 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Antimicrobial Materials)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Manuscript number chemistry-2551193 entitled “The Antimicrobial and Mosquitocidal Activity of Green Synthesized Magnesium Oxide Nanoparticles by An Aqueous Peel Extract of Punica granatum”

In this work, authors prepared nanoparticles of MgO using extract of Punica granatum. They evaluated the antimicrobial activity against both gram negative and gram positive bacteria as well some fungi. Also, evaluated the mortality percentages of different pathogenic microbes at different concentration of MgO nanoparticles. However, one of the main drawbacks of this work is the lack of discussion of results. Also, there are some issues that must be addressed before publication.

Therefore, this manuscript cannot be accepted for publication in Chemistry in its actual form. Please, see below my comments.

Comments:

a)      Authors must highlight the novelty of this work, since the preparation of MgO nanoparticles using natural extract has been widely reported.

b)      Conclusions must be rewritten. First part seems an abstract.

c)      In FTIR results, authors mention many groups but they do not describe where they from. Also, image of FTIR must be improved, spectra are overlapped.

d)     Figure 4 and Table 1 are not necessary.

e)      It would has been interesting if authors have varied parameters during the synthesis of MgO nanoparticles as extract concentration, amount of Mg salt, temperature, etc. in order to see how these parameters affect the morphology, size etc of nanoparticles as usually is done.

Language is O.K.

Author Response

Dear reviewer, thank you very much for your valuable comments. We revised the manuscript based on the recommended comments which were answered point-by-point as shown in the author's response file. 

"Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear reviewer, thank you very much for your valuable comments. We revised the manuscript based on the recommended comments which were answered point-by-point as shown in the author's response file. 

"Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Manuscript number chemistry-2551193 entitled “The Antimicrobial and Mosquitocidal Activity of Green Synthesized Magnesium Oxide Nanoparticles by An Aqueous Peel Extract of Punica granatum”

Authors have addressed all my comments. Therefore, this manuscript can be accepted for publication in Chemistry in its actual form.

No comments

Back to TopTop