Robotic Arts: Current Practices, Potentials, and Implications
AbstractGiven that the origin of the “robot” comes from efforts to create a worker to help people, there has been relatively little research on making a robot for non-work purposes. However, some researchers have explored robotic arts since Leonardo da Vinci. Many questions can be posed regarding the potentials of robotic arts: (1) Is there anything we can call machine-creativity? (2) Can robots improvise artworks on the fly? and (3) Can art robots pass the Turing test? To ponder these questions and see the current status quo of robotic arts, the present paper surveys the contributions of robotics in diverse forms of arts, including drawing, theater, music, and dance. The present paper describes selective projects in each genre, core procedure, possibilities and limitations within the aesthetic computing framework. Then, the paper discusses implications of these robotic arts in terms of both robot research and art research, followed by conclusions including answers to the questions posed at the outset. View Full-Text
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Jeon, M. Robotic Arts: Current Practices, Potentials, and Implications. Multimodal Technologies Interact. 2017, 1, 5.
Jeon M. Robotic Arts: Current Practices, Potentials, and Implications. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction. 2017; 1(2):5.Chicago/Turabian Style
Jeon, Myounghoon. 2017. "Robotic Arts: Current Practices, Potentials, and Implications." Multimodal Technologies Interact. 1, no. 2: 5.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.