Reply of
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2018, 4(2), 13.
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2018, 4(2), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns4020014
A Reply to Comment on Kluckow M. Barriers to the Implementation of Newborn Pulse Oximetry Screening: A Different Perspective. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2018, 4(1), 4
Department of Neonatal Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia
Received: 12 April 2018 / Revised: 13 April 2018 / Accepted: 13 April 2018 / Published: 17 April 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neonatal Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Defects)
View Full-Text
|
Download PDF [152 KB, uploaded 3 May 2018]
Note: In lieu of an abstract, this is an excerpt from the first page.
Excerpt
The commentary provided by Gentles et al. argues for the implementation of a universal pulse oximetry screening program, and I agree that, if it is possible, this is the optimum way to introduce this important health care measure for all of the reasons set out by the authors.[...] View Full-Text
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
Share & Cite This Article
MDPI and ACS Style
Kluckow, M. A Reply to Comment on Kluckow M. Barriers to the Implementation of Newborn Pulse Oximetry Screening: A Different Perspective. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2018, 4(1), 4. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2018, 4, 14.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
Related Articles
Article Metrics
Comments
[Return to top]
Int. J. Neonatal Screen.
EISSN 2409-515X
Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland
RSS
E-Mail Table of Contents Alert