Next Article in Journal
Biomaterials Based on Chitosan and Polyvinyl Alcohol as a Drug Delivery System with Wound-Healing Effects
Previous Article in Journal
The Application of Hyaluronic Acid Injections in Functional and Aesthetic Andrology: A Narrative Review
 
 
Correction published on 15 January 2024, see Gels 2024, 10(1), 64.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The State of the Art of Natural Polymer Functionalized Fe3O4 Magnetic Nanoparticle Composites for Drug Delivery Applications: A Review

by
Abu Hassan Nordin
1,2,
Zuliahani Ahmad
2,
Siti Muhamad Nur Husna
2,
Rushdan Ahmad Ilyas
1,3,*,
Ahmad Khusairi Azemi
4,
Noraznawati Ismail
4,*,
Muhammad Luqman Nordin
5,6,
Norzita Ngadi
1,
Nordin Hawa Siti
7,
Walid Nabgan
8,
Abd Samad Norfarhana
1,9 and
Mohammad Saifulddin Mohd Azami
2
1
Faculty of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai 81310, Johor, Malaysia
2
Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Arau 02600, Perlis, Malaysia
3
Centre for Advanced Composite Materials (CACM), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Skudai 81310, Johor, Malaysia
4
Institute of Marine Biotechnology, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Terengganu 21030, Terengganu, Malaysia
5
Department of Clinical Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Pengkalan Chepa, Kota Bharu 16100, Kelantan, Malaysia
6
Centre for Nanotechnology in Veterinary Medicine (NanoVet), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Pengkalan Chepa, Kota Bharu 16100, Kelantan, Malaysia
7
Pharmacology Unit, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Kuala Terengganu 20400, Terengganu, Malaysia
8
Departament d’Enginyeria Química, Universitat Rovira I Virgili, Av. Països Catalans 26, 43007 Tarragona, Spain
9
Department of Petrochemical Engineering, Politeknik Tun Syed Nasir Syed Ismail, Pagoh Education Hub, Pagoh Muar 84600, Johor, Malaysia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Gels 2023, 9(2), 121; https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9020121
Submission received: 13 December 2022 / Revised: 25 January 2023 / Accepted: 26 January 2023 / Published: 1 February 2023 / Corrected: 15 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Gel Processing and Engineering)

Abstract

:
Natural polymers have received a great deal of interest for their potential use in the encapsulation and transportation of pharmaceuticals and other bioactive compounds for disease treatment. In this perspective, the drug delivery systems (DDS) constructed by representative natural polymers from animals (gelatin and hyaluronic acid), plants (pectin and starch), and microbes (Xanthan gum and Dextran) are provided. In order to enhance the efficiency of polymers in DDS by delivering the medicine to the right location, reducing the medication’s adverse effects on neighboring organs or tissues, and controlling the medication’s release to stop the cycle of over- and under-dosing, the incorporation of Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles with the polymers has engaged the most consideration due to their rare characteristics, such as easy separation, superparamagnetism, and high surface area. This review is designed to report the recent progress of natural polymeric Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles in drug delivery applications, based on different polymers’ origins.

1. Introduction

Drug delivery refers to methods, formulations, technologies, and systems for delivering drugs to the body as required to effectively and safely produce their intended therapeutic effects [1]. Active medication molecules should concentrate precisely and specifically in the illness region over an extended time with great controllability to increase their therapeutic effectiveness and decrease unwanted adverse effects. Despite significant advancements in drug delivery formulation over the last two decades, regulating drug entry into the body remains challenging. This is because some drugs need excellent distribution in order to provide the quickest reaction [2].
Therefore, therapeutics have been integrated into polymers to safely transport medications across hostile physiological areas. The incorporated polymers must be biodegradable to enhance release kinetics and avoid carrier accumulation [3]. Biodegradable polymers are often divided into two categories, which are synthetic and natural. Natural polymers have been used to deliver drugs because they have minimal immunogenicity and antibacterial activity while delivering bioactive substances to specific tissues, cells, and cell compartments [4,5,6]. They are readily available and can be extracted mainly from plants [7], animals [8], and microbes [9]. It is worth mentioning that, despite several pre-clinical experiments with a variety of biodegradable polymers showing efficacy, only a small number of these materials have been approved for use in humans and have progressed to post-clinical testing. Then, much work has gone into creating new functional polymers, which offer various benefits over nonfunctionalized polymers in drug delivery systems [10]. Some specific functionalized polymers, called smart polymers, have gained popularity for their ability to react deftly to environmental cues, including temperature [11], pH [12], light [13], electrical fields [14], and magnetic fields [15].
Polymeric magnetic composites have emerged as one of these materials with the highest promise because of their particular characteristics, such as rapid response and remote control capabilities [16]. The incorporation of Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) and polymers will result in polymers with magnetic sensitivity, which can address the constraints of conventional polymers in targeted drug administration and remotely controlled release. This paper aims to give readers an overview of the recent development of natural polymeric magnetic composites in drug delivery applications. The first part comprises a special focus on the most commonly used natural polymers derived from animals, plants, and microbes in drug delivery applications. In particular, we emphasized and addressed the latest research and uses of gelatin, hyaluronic acid, pectin, starch, xanthan gum, and dextran polymers in drug delivery systems. Then, this work discusses the potential advantages of using Fe3O4 MNPs conjugated with natural polymers by the formation of composites and loaded with different drugs for various disease treatments. The magnetic properties of the polymeric Fe3O4 MNPs composites are useful because they can be directed to the target site via an external magnetic field (EMF). Finally, the future prospects of the research have also been proposed for the advancement of biomedical fields.

2. Applications of Natural Polymers in DDS

Initially, natural polymers were created for use in a variety of biomaterials applications. In this section, the main focus is to review the development of natural polymers, specifically gelatin, hyaluronic acid, pectin, starch, xanthan gum, and dextran polymers for drug delivery applications. Figure 1 shows a brief history of the development of these natural polymer applications in drug delivery systems (DDS). The illustration of the mechanism of delivering drugs to the targeted cell by natural polymers is presented in Figure 2. Generally, blood flow and the extravasation effect (named passive targeting) are the main mechanisms used by most polymer carriers for cell targeting, which depends on blood circulation [17]. On the other hand, active targeting by polymeric systems is accomplished by coupling ligands that are recognized by certain receptors overexpressed on the cell [18]. Besides that, the polymeric systems may target the cell via the use of stimuli-responsive carriers, intracellular drug targeting, intratumoral drug targeting, and cell vasculature drug targeting [19].

2.1. Gelatin

Gelatin is hydrophilic in nature and derived from the controlled denaturation of protein or collagen hydrolysis obtained from animal tissues (e.g., cartilage, skin, and bone) of animals such as porcine, bovine, or fish [20]. The different types and ages of animals, as well as the collagen type such as type I or type II, will affect the physical and chemical characteristics of the extracted collagen [21]. A number of functional side groups in gelatin allow an appropriate mechanical property via chemical crosslinking [22]. Cell–biomaterial interactions of gelatin have shown effectiveness through the exposure of various ligands, such as peptide motifs of Arg-Gly-Asp peptides (RGD) that promote the binding of cells and carriers [21,23].
Gelatin-based hydrogel involvement in transdermal drug delivery through microneedle (MN) patches allows the delivery of drugs directly into subcutaneous tissue with fewer side effects and is painless. Figure 3 shows a preparation of gelatin-based hydrogel by a recent study on keloid scarring using a gelatin hydrogel-based MN of amphiphilic gelatin nanoparticles loaded with gallic acid and quercetin known as QAGN [22]. The results showed that the MN patches could adhere to the stratum corneum, producing a controlled release of QAGN drugs and downregulated Col I and Col III gene expression of fibroblasts in the combination drug system.
Curcumin, an anticancer drug, is known as an unstable and less soluble drug [24]. A few attempts have been made to enhance its stability and solubility using gelatin polymer in various forms. A hydrogel-based MN fabricated from gelatin methacryloyl and β-cyclodextrin (GelMA-β-CD) loaded with curcumin is introduced to overcome the limitations [25]. MN arrays on 3D B16F10 melanoma spheroids were assessed for in vitro anticancer efficacy, and higher therapeutic efficacy compared to non-transdermal patches. In vivo analysis was conducted to verify the degradability and compatibility of the MN arrays patch of GelMA-β-CD. Another application was presented by formulating curcumin into the gelatin hydrophilic network and hydroxyapatite nanoparticles [26]. This formulation showed a sustained release of curcumin, demonstrating higher internalization into the cell and toxicity towards A549 cells (lung cells) than free curcumin. Both studies on curcumin showed the same results through improvement in the stability and solubility of the curcumin and gelatin polymer, a good biomaterial to be included in the formulation. Another application of natural polymer gelatin is as a drug delivery carrier of carvedilol (CAR) (i.e., a drug used to treat respiratory disorders that possess limitations in terms of solubility and bioavailability) [27]. To overcome these weaknesses, CAR was packed into halloysite nanotubes (HNTs) and was capsulated in a gelatin-based microsphere that was responsive to internal stimuli pHs (HNTs/CAR@GM) [27]. The results showed HNTs/CAR@GM having fast drug release under acidic conditions (pH = 1.2) and non-toxicity against Caco-2 cells. In summary, this study showed that HNTs/CAR@GM showed potential to be exploited in oral DDSs.
Transdermal drug delivery can be achieved by incorporating drugs of interest into a hydrogel (i.e., crosslinked polymeric networks that are capable to sustain high water amounts). The above studies represent good approaches to gelatin usage in making hydrogel benefiting from its high solubility and amphoteric behavior. MN hydrogels serve as a novel method for transdermal drug delivery with less pain than percutaneous administration, and gelatin serves as a promising natural polymeric material for this system. The summary of studies on gelatin-based DDSs is presented in Table 1.

2.2. Hyaluronic Acid (HA)

HA is an anionic polymer of naturally occurring mucopolysaccharide, non-sulfated glycosaminoglycan commonly found in various body parts (e.g., vitreous humor, joints, connective tissue, umbilical cord, and skin) [28,29]. HA comprises N-acetyl-D-glucosamine and D-glucuronic acid that are linked together by glycosidic bonds of β-(1,4) and β-(1,3) [30]. CD44 is a protein surrounded by a membrane that is often highly expressed in various cancer cells [31] and a major receptor for HA. Therefore, HA can target CD44 targeted signaling [32] and is a promising candidate for polymer in delivering anti-cancer drugs to target specific tumor sites.
Extensive research was conducted on HA in targeting CD44 in various cancer cells. Conjugation of HA-tetraphenyl ethylene (HA-SS-TPE) with glutathione-responsiveness, a novel DDS was designed. This system was developed by self-assembling HA-SS-TPE and loaded with doxorubicin (DOX) to create DOX-loaded polymeric micelles [33]. Interestingly, this novel DDS showed great efficacy in unloading DOX through fast glutathione-triggered dissociation. CD44-positive cells (ES2 and Hela) exhibited a greater intercellular release ratio of DOX compared to CD44-negative cells. The above results showed the great system capability to be incorporated in overexpressed CD44 cancer cells. In addition, an avant-garde halloysite nanotube-based DDS was designed with an HA-modified halloysite (HNTs-NH-HA) compound loaded with DOX [34]. HNTs-NH-HA/DOX increased the DOX therapeutic efficacy and showed high antitumor efficiency in CD44-positive Hela cells compared to HNTs/DOX or free DOX. This concluded that added HA in the system effectively improved DOX targeting, and this serves as a new possibility in cancer treatment.
DOX-loaded micelle-like nanoparticles for targeted DDS were created by self-assembling conjugate HA–human serum albumin (HAssHSA) attained by covalent attachment of HSA to a cystamine-modified HA [35]. The efficacy of this system is demonstrated by higher cytotoxicity of MDA-MB231 cells conducted by the system compared to free DOX. CD44-mediated internalization of nanoparticles was also confirmed; thus, this system serves as a safety strategy for DOX delivery. HA has been constructed by MN loaded with the drug minoxidil (MXD) for alopecia therapy [36]. In vivo trial was conducted on alopecia mice, and the results showed enhancement of hair dermal papilla (HDP) cells facilitated by a cluster of distinction CD44 and serine-threonine kinase (Akt) phosphorylation. Thus, reduced hair loss in alopecia indicated the effectiveness of delivering MXD using MXD-HA-MNs with minimized side effects of MXD. This study was the first to report the explicit anti-alopecia effects of using MXD-HA-MNs. Next, the HA hydrogel interpenetrating network (IPN) of HA/Poloxamer 407-co-poly (methacrylic acid) was designed to target 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in colorectal cancer [37]. pH-dependent swelling and release (hydrogen swelled at pH 7.4 and released more drug at pH 1.2) were maintained in a controlled manner for a more extended period of 5-FU. The toxicity assessment on rabbits also showed the compatibility of this hydrogel with biological systems. Thus, this hydrogel formulation is promising to be used in drug delivery to the colon.
In addition, multi-stimuli responsive HA-hydrogels were effectively formulated with cross-linker diselenide bonds for precise release of DOX as shown in Figure 4 [38]. DOX-loaded hydrogel resulted in an antitumor impact in breast cancer cells (BT-29). Incorporating indocyanine green (ICG) into the DOX-loaded hydrogel further improved the antitumor efficacy of DOX. Drug contents in DOX/ICG-loaded hydrogel were higher compared to DOX-loaded hydrogel, 94% and 4.54%, respectively. Thus, this study summarized that multi-responsive HA-hydrogel can be achieved by incorporating multiple cleavable bonds using diselenide bonds and the result showed a great efficacy of DOX-loaded hydrogel compared to free DOX and the addition of ICG has further improved the system.
Chemotherapeutic drugs such as DOX have inevitable drawbacks with poor targeting as well as poor clinical efficacy. Although CD44 is usually overexpressed in cancer cells, HA, known as CD44 receptor-mediated targeting, is a good choice of polymer to carry the anticancer drug more efficiently. In vitro studies showed a great efficacy of using HA as biomaterials, thus in vivo studies are demanding for future studies. A summary of studies on HA-based DDS is presented in Table 2.

2.3. Pectin

Pectin, a naturally occurring negatively charged polysaccharide is commonly found in plant cell walls of peaches, apples, and citruses. This anionic polysaccharide resembles HA and alginate, but it holds unique characteristics owing to its stiffening and solidifying abilities. These capabilities are vital in creating an excellent DDS for the gastrointestinal (GI) system. Notably, the excellent mucoadhesion and superior stability in the GI are due to its high resistance towards enzyme degradation (e.g., proteases and amylases) [39,40]. Pectin’s benefits to its gelling property make it a superior choice for oral insulin delivery compared to other anionic polysaccharides. However, pectin faces two major problems in the GI environment: the limited capacity of enterocytes to target the polymer and untimely drug release [39].
Therefore, Figure 5 shows a preparation of insulin DDS using folic acid (FA)-modified pectin nanoparticles (INS/DFAN). This system was prepared by a dual-crosslinking process using calcium ions and adipic dihydrazide (ADH) as crosslinkers to overcome the limitations [39]. Initially, pectin in this study was isolated from head residues of sunflower to produce low-methoxyl pectin (AHP). Findings from in vitro experiments showed the insulin dispersion behaviors of INS/DFAN influenced by the COOH/ADH molar ratio in the dual-crosslinking procedure. INS/DFAN can efficiently prevent the untimely release of insulin compared to ionic-crosslinked nanoparticles (INS/FAN). INS/DFAN also exhibited high encapsulation efficiency, excellent stability, and enhanced insulin delivery, whereas in vivo experiments on type 1 diabetic rats demonstrated improved hypoglycaemic effects and improved insulin bioavailability over INS/FAN. Overall, the combination of dual crosslinking and FA modification on pectin nano-vehicles was found to serve as a good strategy to enhance oral insulin delivery.
Next, a study by Bostanudin et al. proposed nanoformulations of amphipathically modified pectin-containing fusidic acid [41]. The amphipathic properties of a nanocarrier are important to surmount cell membrane impenetrability to boost drug permeation through the skin and to allow the delivery of both hydrophilic and hydrophobic particles or macromolecules into cells [41,42]. Amphipathically modified pectin (GBE-PEC) fabrication material is then converted into spherical nanostructures (NSs) [41]. Encapsulated fusidic acid was released in a more controlled manner (loading degree 14.9%), and in vitro interaction with HaCaT cells showed a non-cytotoxicity profile and demonstrated a greater (two-fold) penetration rate through the Strat-M® membrane compared to the native pectin NSs. The improvement in the amphipathic properties drove the efficiency of poorly penetrating actives such as fusidic acid through percutaneous delivery.
Pectin has been shown as a good polymer to carry drugs through the oral delivery system, influenced by its ability in gelling to produce high stability and high resistance towards the harsh environment in the GI. Integrating pectin polymer for oral drugs such as diabetic drugs represents a therapeutic window for diabetes treatments. The summary of studies on pectin-based DDS is presented in Table 3.

2.4. Starch

Starch is the amplest biopolymer obtained from plant sources; it is disposed of two macromolecules and linear- and branched-chain polymers. Its sensitivity to physical and chemical alterations and its capability to form thermoplastics are among its unique properties [43]. Starch is a major excipient in the pharmaceutical industry, especially in oral drug delivery. However, there are several major drawbacks of starch; 1. weak mechanical properties, 2. fast degradation in the body, 3. extreme viscosity after heating, 4. not soluble in cold water, and 5. capable of decomposing again [44]. Therefore, to overcome the limitations of this high-potential biomaterial, much current research was conducted with a new formulation strategy.
Nanoparticles can serve as co-distributers of anti-inflammatory medicines and reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavengers for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapy. Curcumin can be conjugated with hydroxyethyl starch (HES) and loaded with dexamethasone (DEX) to create DEX-loaded HES-CUR nanoparticles (DHC NPs) [45]. α-amylase is present in inflamed colon-degraded HES and allows the drugs to be released in an α-amylase-responsive way. DHC NPs also showed effective internalization and cytocompatibility with macrophages. DHC NPs are significantly greater in efficacy compared to free DEX in treated ulcerative colitis in the in vivo study. Thus, the results from this study stated that DHC NPs are having a therapeutic window for the emergence of novel oral formulations for IBD rehabilitation. Carvacrol is a phenolic compound that is prone to degrade in harsh conditions, especially in the GI. This drug requires a good carrier to protect them and ensure the optimal release of the drug in a controlled pattern. Thus, incorporating carvacrol in starch nanofiber by electrospinning a starch solution serves a great deal [46]. Carvacrol was delivered successfully by resisting in vitro digestion and produced a 50% decline in tumoral cells in glioma cells of C6 rats. Carvacrol-loaded starch nanofibers are safe and non-toxic to the cell. This suggests a good formulation for cancer treatment.
Targeting colon cancer therapy concurrently uses co-loaded DOX and 5-Fu on as-created layered double hydroxides LDH(Mg-Al) (LDH(MgAl)@DOX,5-Fu) [44]. The system was then encapsulated into carboxymethyl starch, forming CMS@LDH(MgAl)@DOX,5-Fu microspheres. It presented a reassuring constant drug release pattern and precise release profile of DOX and 5-Fu of ~22% and ~29%, respectively. The findings suggested the potential of the proposed microsphere for oral co-drug delivery. Figure 6 below illustrates the research of CMS@LDH(MgAl)@DOX,5-Fu microspheres.
In summary, colonic drug delivery requires a targeted system accounting for the harsh physiological state of the GI that has an acidic environment and a high concentration of hydrolytic enzyme. Therefore, proposing a good DDS is crucial for curing digestive system disorders: Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, and colorectal cancer. Starch has proven itself as a promising natural polymer for DDSs in the GI through several successful studies on starch formulations. The summary of studies on pectin-based DDSs is presented in Table 4.

2.5. Xanthan Gum (XG)

XG is a natural polymer originating from the fermentation process of the microorganism Xanthomonas campestris [47]. Its high molecular weight is owed to its unique chemical properties; i.e., it is composed mainly of a β-1,4-D-glucopyranose glucan backbone with a pendant trisaccharide side chain, disposed of mannose (β-1,4) and glucuronic acid (β-1,2), as well as terminal mannose residues. This chemical structure makes XG polysaccharides with polyanionic characters. A more detailed chemical structure of XG was discussed [48]. XG stimulated the thickening behavior or assisted suspension in aqueous solutions by influencing the temperature and pH that affect the viscosity of XG. XG confers weak gel-like properties as an outcome of its 3D association with XG chains [49]; thus, hydrogel serves as a better medium for XG through crosslinked 3D networks of hydrophilic polymers through physical–chemical methods. Although XG hydrogel’s biocompatibility is well established [50], some disadvantages such as poor mechanical strength, harsh gelation conditions, and lack of cell attachment moieties are still something appealing to be explored for further improvement. Thus, subsequent studies discuss recent research on XG modification.
XG has been widely used in incorporating diabetes medication, and the following studies are discussed. The repaglinide drug to treat type 2 diabetes was loaded into hydrogel particles of XG derivatives, carboxyethyl XG and carboxymethyl XG, in a ratio of 1:2 (i.e., maximum drug entrapment efficiency of 92%) [51]. The system released 97% of the drug in 4 h stimulated by GI pH and prolonged drug release for 8 h. The repaglinide’s amorphous dispersion was observed after the entrapment. The clinical benefit shown by this system was a reduction in blood glucose levels (maximum 52.8%), indicating that this system is beneficial in future diabetes treatment. Another diabetes drug is glibenclamide (i.e., an oral agent) loaded into mouth-dissolving films (MDFs), named GMDFs [52]. XG was added into the composition of GMDF as a film matrix through the solvent casting method, and the GMDF3 formulation composed of 200 mg presented the highest drug entrapment (96.1 ± 5.89). This GMDF also showed an instant release of the drug, rapid dissolution, and optimum mechanical strength. The GMDF1-3 showed a 96–98% discharge of the drug, and a 94% and 90% discharge of the drug in GMDF4 and GMDF5, respectively. These results suggested an XG film matrix can produce a stable DDS for glibenclamide in diabetes treatment using MDF.
Another MDFs was created using XG by loading amlodipine (i.e., hypertensive drug) aiming to rapidly release the drug for the faster relief of hypertension [53]. This formulation shows exceptionally rapid results (i.e., complete drug release within 10 min) and drug release dispersion with optimum mechanical strength. Accelerated drug release in this formulation represented a therapeutic window in hypertension treatment. Hesperidin (HSP) (i.e., drug against P. vulgaris) was characterized as having low solubility. Therefore, Alam and colleagues produced HSP-enabled gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) stabilized with xanthan gum (XA), indicated as HSP@XA@AuNPs. HSP@XA@AuNPs gel was also prepared by integrating the formulation into a Carbopol gel base [54]. The results showed greater effectiveness in drug release by HSP@XA@AuNPs gel compared to HSP@XA@AuNPs, 86.26% and 73.08%, respectively. In addition, the gel demonstrated antimicrobial activity as opposed to P. vulgaris (i.e., minimum inhibitory concentration of 1.78 µg/mL). In conclusion, the HSP@XA@AuNPs gel may represent a new strategy to inhibit P. vulgaris infection.
In summary, XG’s limitation on its mechanical strength has been successfully defeated by XG derivative modification on its backbone through carboxymethylation and acetylation as shown by Patel et al. [51]. The steady hydrogel networks developed the subsequent formation of polymeric ionic bridges or synchronized ties among carboxylate ions of XG derivatives and aluminum ions. In addition, adding XG in formulations improved the DDSs of MDFs to a higher par [52,53]. Moreover, XG has been utilized in the oral and transdermal DDSs of various drugs. Figure 7 illustrates the summary of applications of XG in oral and transdermal DDSs, whereas the summary of studies on XG-based DDSs is presented in Table 5.

2.6. Dextran

Dextran is a naturally biodegradable polymer obtained from microbe sources. It is feasibly isolated from numerous Gram-positive, facultatively anaerobe cocci (e.g., leuconostoc and streptococcus strains) [55]. Dextran is highly soluble in water, DMSO glycerol, and ethylene glycol because of its neutral complex amylopectin-chain glucan composed of α-1, six glycosidic linkages in the middle of glucose monomers [56]. Dextran-based nanocarriers have great aqueous solubility, which can accelerate drug suspension. Dextran is also a non-toxic biopolymer as it does not accumulate toxicity in the GI compared to synthetic polymers due to its ability to metabolize with digestive enzymes, making dextran a favorable polymer in oral drug delivery [55]. However, natural dextran still retains shortcomings regarding its physiochemical properties such as surface-immobilized dextran limiting cell adhesion and spreading [57], which limits its utility for tissue engineering [58]. Thus, it requires the modification of its backbone through conjugation with drugs, amidation, carboxymethylation, acetylation, cross-linking, and grafting with other natural, synthetic, or semisynthetic polymers [59]. Dextran is supported by modification as shown in the following studies.
Dextran is an example of an ultrasound-responsive polymeric material (i.e., combination of imaging techniques plus therapeutic) in DDSs that represents cost effectiveness and is non-invasive and more targeted compared to other internal or external stimuli-responsive (e.g., UV-, thermal, and pH-responsive) materials [60,61]. Dextran has been integrated into the novel nanotechnology of nanodroplets for ultrasound-induced cancer treatment [62]. Dextran stabilized perfluorohexane nanodroplets comprising the DOX drug. The outcomes are reported as follows: its particle size and encapsulation effectiveness were significantly amplified by elevating polymer concentrations, and in vitro analysis showed a biphasic drug release system of 82.95% of the DOX from the optimal formulation (0.1% w/v dextran, 24,000 rpm homogenization speed and 500 µg DOX content) after 10 min of exposure to ultrasound. Thus, this formulation showed a therapeutic window in ultrasound-induced cancer treatment.
NIR light has intelligently worked with DDSs by having robust trigger levels, deeper dissemination through concerned sites, and a small number of side effects compared to UV light [63]. Topical photothermal hydrogel for NIR-controlled DDSs was prepared by the polymerization of vinyl-functionalized dextran (DexIEM), vinyl-modified graphene oxide (GM), and Laponite; the hydrogel was then inserted with ciprofloxacin (i.e., an antibacterial drug) [64]. Ciprofloxacin in the DexIEM-GM-Laponite hydrogel dispersion remained in a NIR-controlled manner in an ex vivo trial. Interestingly, this hydrogel system exhibited excellent performance in terms of antibacterial effects and good compatibility with blood. This study suggested a novel system for a NIR-responsive DDS. Celastrol (Cel), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) drug, was loaded into nanoparticles made up of modified dextran (dextran-sulfate-PVGLIG), named DPC [65]. It resulted in a high entrapment of DPC@Cel micelles (around 44.04%) and a zeta potential of −11.91 mV. The nanoparticles effectively delivered the drug to the inflammatory joint and metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) at the accelerated Cel released through in vitro observation. An in vivo trial confirmed that DPC@Cel improved anti-RA effects and decreased systemic toxicity in comparison to free Cel. This indicated an effective system of Cel delivery to the target site.
Lastly, a pH-sensitive dextran-based micelle scheme was fabricated using an ester click reaction of copper-free azide-propiolate, self-constructed from amphiphilic dextran-graft-poly(2-(diisopropylamino) ethyl methacrylate-co-2-(2′,3′,5′-triiodobenzoyl) ethyl methacrylate), or dextran-g-P(DPA-co-TIBMA) [66]. DOX-loaded dextran-g-P(DPA-co-TIBMA) micelles showed a reduced speed release of DOX at pH 7.4 but were significantly sped up under an acidic state (pH 6 and 5). Micelles of dextran-g-P(DPA-co-TIBMA) optimally released DOX into MCF-7 cells. DOX-loaded dextran-g-P(DPA-co-TIBMA) was found to have excellent anticancer efficacy and effectively reduced the growth of tumors with little body weight reduction in in vitro and in vivo studies, respectively. Both in vitro and in vivo studies demonstrated a promising strategy using this system in tumor suppression.
To conclude, the recent applications of dextran polymeric materials have been directed towards multi-stimuli responsive DDSs such as pH, NIR light, and ultrasound. Stimuli-responsive materials are of vast importance because of their capacity to undergo adjustment of their properties in response to their environment. For example, the pH-responsive polymer is characterized by its features of moieties that can donate or accept cations upon an environmental change in pH [67]. However, light-reactive polymers use light as a versatile stimulus through their subsequent light-responsive moieties which can be related to photoinduced isomerization and/or photochromism [68]. This smart polymer produces more refined applications, due to the variability that is introduced to the responsiveness. Figure 8 presents the multi-responsive dextran-based drug (DOX) vehicle for cancer treatments. The summary of studies on dextran-based DDSs is presented in Table 6.

3. Applications of Natural Polymeric Fe3O4 MNPs Composites in DDSs

The three main goals of drug delivery are to deliver medicine to the right location, reduce the medication’s adverse effects on neighboring organs or tissues, and control the medication’s release to stop the cycle of over- and under-dosing [69,70]. These objectives may be accomplished by utilizing Fe3O4 MNPs because of their distinctive characteristics, magnetism, and simplicity of manipulation using an EMF, which sends drug-carrying Fe3O4 MNPs to the targeted location directly (as shown in Figure 9).
Interestingly, Fe3O4 MNPs can be used to control the release of drugs or other active agents in drug delivery applications. The use of Fe3O4 MNPs in controlled release systems is based on the ability of magnetic fields to exert forces on the MNPs and the associated drugs. When exposed to an EMF, Fe3O4 MNPs align themselves along the field lines, creating a magnetic gradient force. The drugs can be adsorbed or encapsulated onto or within the MNPs, and the combined system can be used to control the release of the drugs. The effect of Fe3O4 MNPs on controlled releases can be influenced by several factors such as the size and morphology or anisotropy of the Fe3O4 MNPs, and the strength and duration of the applied magnetic field. By tailoring these factors, it is possible to achieve a wide range of release profiles.

3.1. Effect of Fe3O4 MNPs Size in DDSs

The size of Fe3O4 MNPs can have a significant influence on their ability to assist in DDS. The fine size of Fe3O4 MNPs contributes to the large surface-to-volume ratio, which allows for the greater loading of drugs [72]. Then, the loaded drug molecules on Fe3O4 MNPs can be delivered into the body and concentrated in a local area (avoiding damage to other tissues) via the effect of EMF. Shapiro [73] demonstrated that a series of EMFs may force a magnetic carrier through a central area, creating a focus at a deep target. The Fe3O4 MNPs may also be heated in a magnetic field (MF) to cause the release of a drug. This can result in a higher drug payload and improved efficacy of the drug delivery system [74,75]. Moreover, the size of MNPs may affect their magnetic properties. Smaller Fe3O4 MNPs have a higher magnetic moment per unit volume, which makes them more responsive to EMFs. This can be used to control the release of drugs in a targeted way. Despite that, the tiny size of Fe3O4 MNPs is a constraint as it causes magnetic agglomeration when the EMF is withdrawn. Once the EMF is withdrawn, it is challenging to maintain the Fe3O4 MNPs in the targeted organ, which causes them to agglomerate. Additionally, it is challenging to aim particles, maintain them near the target, and endure the drag of blood flow when the size is tiny as it suggests a magnetic response of diminished strength [76]. Targeting is presumably more effective in regions with slower blood flow, particularly when the EMF is close.
On the other hand, larger MNPs can be more stable and less prone to aggregation, which can increase the circulation time in the body and improve the targeting of the MNPs to specific regions of the body. However, larger MNPs have a lower surface area-to-volume ratio, subsequently limiting the amount of drugs that can be loaded onto them. Therefore, it is necessary to regulate nanoparticle sizes throughout the preparation phase in order to efficiently use them as medication carriers.
Therefore, these problems might be addressed by combining Fe3O4 MNPs with the appropriate polymers. It provides the particles with long-term stability by adding a layer of protection that encourages repulsive forces to counterbalance the magnetic and van der Waals forces on the magnetic particles [77]. Moreover, Schneider-Futschik and Reyes-Ortega [78] stated that the safest Fe3O4 MNPs and the coating are formed by a natural polymer.

3.2. Effect of Morphology or Anisotropy of Fe3O4 MNPs in DDSs

The morphology or anisotropy of Fe3O4 MNPs significantly influence their magnetic response. Anisotropy refers to the directional dependence of the magnetic properties of a material. MNPs can have either isotropic or anisotropic properties, depending on the method of synthesis and the shape of the particles. Anisotropic Fe3O4 MNPs have a preferred direction of magnetization, which can be influenced by the shape of the particles. For example, rod-shaped Fe3O4 MNPs have a higher magnetic anisotropy than spherical MNPs and tend to align along the long axis of the particle when exposed to an EMF. In addition, compared to spherical micelles, filomicelles have shown a larger potential for encapsulating anticancer drugs and more apoptotic efficacy. Chen et al. [79] investigated in vivo the anticancer effects of different micelle shapes and revealed that filamentous micelles had the best DOX loading and encapsulation capabilities. Other investigated shapes of nanoparticles reported were rod, worm, and bead. According to the literature, rod-shaped and non-spherical nanoparticles have a longer blood circulation duration than spherical nanoparticles [80,81]. This may be due to macrophages that are less active in phagocytic activity when exposed to rod-shaped particles than when exposed to spherical ones [82]. On the other hand, spherical nanoparticles may provide an even surface coating and conjugation of ligands in surface modification; thus, more drugs can be conjugated on the surface of nanoparticles for improved drug release at the targeted spot and therefore display larger cellular toxicity [83].
In addition, the morphology of Fe3O4 MNPs can influence their magnetic properties. For example, Fe3O4 MNPs that have a core–shell structure have different magnetic properties than solid Fe3O4 NPs. The shell material can also have a significant impact on the magnetic properties, as it can provide a protective barrier for the core and prevent oxidation or degradation. In a recent study of a micelle system by chitosan-based Fe3O4 MNPs undergoing surface modification by a shell of mesoporous silica and γ-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane using a silane coupling method to study the drug release behavior of DOX, the observation resulted in faster drug release at pH 6.0 than at pH 7.4 [84]. Other studies of pH-responsive Fe3O4 MNPs implemented surface functionalization alteration by incorporating UiO-66-NH2 (i.e., zirconium-based functional organic metal framework) [85]. Moreover, double core–shell MNPs of Fe3O4@SiO2@Tann showed the co-delivery of DOX and methotrexate (i.e., anticancer drugs) was significantly higher in pH 5 than pH 7.4 [86].
Overall, the magnetic response of the Fe3O4 MNPs is highly dependent on their morphology and anisotropy. The ability to control these parameters is important for their application in drug delivery applications.

4. Applications of Polymeric Fe3O4 MNP Composites in DDSs

MNPs offer a great interest in a wide range of research including DDSs. Each MNP performs in a single magnetic domain and possesses superparamagnetic behavior, as shown by Fe3O4 MNPs. Superparamagnetic NPs have a low risk of forming agglomerates at room temperature through two special behaviors: 1. huge constant magnetic moment, 2. enormous paramagnetic atom with a rapid response to applied magnetic fields with negligible remanence and coercivity, which make them favorable MNPs in DDSs [87]. However, naked metallic NPs are highly active chemical components which can also easily oxidize in air and cause magnetism loss and dispersibility. Thus, various studies have been conducted to coat MNPs with natural polymers as discussed in this section. Of note, protection shells based on natural polymers not only stabilize the MNPs but can undergo further functionalization of their surfaces depending on the desired application. Fe3O4 MNPs can be guided to deliver drugs to the target site by localized EMFs. The magnetic particles should render high-saturation magnetization to control the movement of particles in the blood by moderate EMFs and to accumulate the particles close to target sites [88]. For example, high saturation magnetization has also been proposed to deliver drugs for breast cancer therapy in a more efficient way [89] and to enhance the biocompatibility of MNPs [90]. Table 7 shows the recent development of natural polymeric Fe3O4 MNP composites in DDSs.
Sirivat and Paradee [91] prepared gelatin-coated Fe3O4 (GFe3O4) composites, as illustrated in Figure 10, with superparamagnetic characteristics that are significant in preventing particle agglomeration and facilitating the rapid dispersion of the particles upon the removal of the EMF [92]. Moreover, although the use of HA-drug conjugates in DDSs has received a lot of attention in recent years [93,94], they do not effectively bind to targeted cancer cells. Fang et al. [95] overcame this issue by developing a more efficient drug delivery system, as displayed in Figure 11 through the modification of mesoporous silica-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles (MSNs) with HA, then loading with DOX. The DOX-HA-MSNs showed remarkable targeting ability as well as efficient anticancer activity both in vitro and in vivo.
Viratchaiboott et al. [96] suggested that the mechanism of Fe3O4 coated with pectin was through electrostatic attraction (as illustrated in Figure 12). Then, the 5-FU was loaded onto the Fe3O4/Pectin through hydrogen bonding. The results found that the duration of the drug release was shortened while the drug diffusion coefficient increased under MFs, which resulted from the magnetic attraction between the magnets and the MNPs. In addition, Figure 13 shows that Guilherme et al. [97] investigated the albumin release mechanism from the starch polymer with and without Fe3O4. According to the authors, the albumin release mechanism of the starch without Fe3O4 was controlled via macromolecular relaxation. The albumin release for starch with Fe3O4 was more reliant on anomalous transportation when an EMF was applied, which amplified the tortuosity effect. As they offered a greater sustention of the drug than the in vitro release experiment, the starch/Fe3O4 is more suitable for application as an oral drug delivery system.
Similarly, Bueno et al. [98] also reported novel antimicrobial materials based on XG, Fe3O4 MNPs, and bovine serum albumin (BSA) that were designed to promote the release of amoxicillin to the medium. The authors highlighted that the release of amoxicillin from the patches was successfully stimulated by applying an EMF. Another example from microbe sources is Dextran, coated with Fe3O4 MNPs and loaded with CUR for the treatment of lung cancer [99]. The observation showed that owing to curcumin’s poor solubility, the drug release is greater in CUR-Dextran-Fe3O4 nanoparticles and slower in curcumin solutions. Overall, the use of EMFs to direct polymeric Fe3O4 MNPs composites to a particular location demonstrates the interesting possibilities of DDSs.
Based on the abovementioned studies on DDSs using Fe3O4 MNPs, there are two suggested routes of administration discussed, which are the oral and transdermal routes of administration for drugs loaded with MNPs. Oral route administration is considered common in delivering drugs using nanotechnologies. This is due to high patient acceptance, convenience, lack of pain, and easy monitoring. The unstable environment of the GI with its acidic pH and various enzymatic activities leads to the degradation of proteins, thereby reducing the therapeutic values of the drugs. Reconsidering this limitation on oral route administration, recently, there have been several studies incorporating the benefits of natural polymers and Fe3O4 MNPs such as oral drug delivery for colon cancer treatment [100,101]. The pH-sensitive nanocomposites for oral drug delivery stabilize the release of drugs to a specific area, such as the colorectal area monitored by an external magnetic source. Thus, this prevents the release of drugs in the stomach, which may cause serious side effects on the digestive system.
Next, the transdermal administration of drugs by delivering them into the bloodstream through the skin using a patch has been recently proposed in Fe3O4 MNPs [96]. The transdermal administration of drugs prevents the first-pass metabolism effects of drugs, which are able to lower the dose of drugs administered and reduce toxicity [102]. Harnessing the advantages of MNPs under the combined influence of magnetic and electric fields increases the efficacy of transdermal drug delivery and allows for a more controlled release of the drug at the target site. The mechanism of action of Fe3O4 MNPs in delivering drugs using oral and transdermal routes of administration is illustrated in Figure 14.
Nevertheless, the consideration of the interaction between an MF and living cells is crucial in the applications of Fe3O4 MNPs. This is because biomagnetic effects have been widely shown to disrupt normal physiology at the cellular or organism levels [103,104,105]. Controlling the levels of EMFs exerted during delivering drugs in MNPs must be carefully monitored, and alternating MFs with a frequency between 100 and 500 kHz is considered a safe frequency for humans [106]. High and ultrahigh MFs exert biological effects such as the long-term impairment of the vestibular system in mice [107], and MFs change the orientation and morphology of mitotic spindles in human cells [108]. Thus, stable Fe3O4 MNPs by incorporating natural polymers have been widely produced to minimize the levels of EMFs required in magnetic drug targeting (MDT) and simultaneously hinder the negative effects of MFs on living cells.
Table 7. Recent studies on natural polymeric MNP composites in DDSs.
Table 7. Recent studies on natural polymeric MNP composites in DDSs.
Gelatin-Based Fe3O4 Composites
FormulationDrug Delivery VehiclePlatformTreatmentLoaded DrugObservationRef.
DG/FA NPsNanoparticlesIn vitroBreast cancerDOXDecreased 48% cell viability.[109]
Gel-MNPsNanocompositeN/ALung and breast cancerCURLoaded drugs are released in a pH-dependent manner, with a greater release rate in a moderately acidic environment.[110]
Fe3O4/GQDs@GMMicrospheresIn vitroBreast cancerCURExhibited high CUR loading capacity.[111]
Alg-Gel/Fe3O4HydrogelIn vitro and
In vivo
HelaDOXExhibited higher drug release value in acidic conditions.[112]
HA-based Fe3O4 composites
CDHA–MGONanocompositeIn vitroTumorDOXTargeting CD44 to accumulate inside tumor cells via HA conjugation.[113]
Fe3O4-HANanoparticlesIn vitro and
In vivo
TumorDOXEnhanced antitumor and anti-metastasis effect.[114]
Fe3O4@HA NPsNanoparticlesIn vitroBreast cancerDOXEnhanced DOX cancer-targeting capabilities.[115]
MGO@CD-CA-HANanocompositeIn vitro and
In vivo
Liver cancerCPTSignificantly reduced tumor growth (more than 90%).[116]
PC/HA@DOX-Fe3O4NanoparticlesIn vivoXenograft tumorDOXEnhanced tumor growth suppression efficacy and significant DOX tumor-targeting capabilities.[117]
Pectin-based Fe3O4 composites
Pectin/Fe3O4NanoparticlesIn vitroSkin5-FUHigher diffusion coefficients and shorter duration periods increased 5-FU release.[96]
Fe3O4/PectinNanoparticlesIn vitroColorectalBHTBest antioxidant activities against DPPH.[118]
AP-MA/PNIPAAm/Fe3O4MicrogelsSGF and SIFColon cancerCURUnder the impact of EMF, a gradual and sustainable CUR release was made.[100]
PEC-GO-Fe3O4NanocompositeIn vitroAedes aegypti larvaePermethrinEnhanced drug loading and release performance up to 16 h.[119]
Pec-gPolyDMAEMA@Fe3O4NanoparticlesIn vitroTumor5-FUA 50 mT magnetic field dramatically (100%) boosted the 5-FU.[120]
Starch-based Fe3O4 composites
CMC/PAA/St-Fe3O4NanocompositeIn vitroColon cancer5-FU5-FU delivery to the intestinal fluid using an external magnetic source.[101]
Fe3O4@CS-Starch/CuNanocompositen.a.Ovarian cancerBHTOvarian cell viability decreased in a dose-dependent manner.[121]
Fe3O4@Gr-IA/St-AlgHydrogelIn vitroWound healingGFNHigh efficiently loaded GFN and drug released in a controlled manner.[122]
Dextran-based Fe3O4 composites
Dextran@Fe3O4NanoparticlesIn vitroProstate cancerAURAUR release was considerably increased in an acidic medium.[123]
Dextran-coated Fe3O4NanoparticlesIn vitroLung cancerDOXEnhanced the drug concentration in the tumor cell by applying EMF.[124]
Dextran/Fe3O4NanoparticlesIn vitro and in vivoTumorPBSThe dextran/Fe3O4 injection-induced tumors entirely vanished after 28 days.[125]
Magnetic dextranMicrogelIn vitroTumorDOXDOX release profile that is both magnetic field and pH sensitive.[126]
CUR: curcumin; N/A: not available; CPT: camptothecin; PTX- paclitaxel; BHT: butylated hydroxytoluene; GFN: guaifenesin; AUR: auraptene; PBS: phosphate-buffered saline; Ref: references.

Biomedical Applications of Fe3O4 MNPs

Apart from Fe3O4 MNPs involvement as a drug delivery carrier, Fe3O4 MNPs have been widely used and commercialized in other biomedical applications. Firstly, MDT, as proposed by the above-mentioned novel studies, shows clinical efficacy and safety, thus warranting further studies and clinical trial enforcement. To date, there are currently no approved Fe3O4 MNPs for MDT. Several clinical trials were conducted on Fe3O4 MNPs for MDT. In 1996, the first phase I clinical trial was conducted in cancer patients to assess the efficacy of Fe3O4/anhydroglucose (ferrofluids)-loaded epirubicin [127] followed by phase I/II to assess the efficacy of DOX loaded in metallic iron-activated carbon [128] and metallic iron-activated carbon [129] in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. However, none of them presented with clear clinical success.
Moreover, Fe3O4 MNPs have been widely used as contrast agents in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to produce high-quality MRI. There are several FDA-approved Fe3O4 MNP contrast agents such as dextran-coated Fe3O4 MNPs (ferumoxide). The clinical trial result on ferumoxide (Resovist) showed enhanced MRI by significantly increasing the tumor/liver contrast [130] to 95% sensitivity in the detection of metastatic tumors [131] and to 27% high MRI quality using ferumoxides compared to non-enhanced images [132]. Moreover, ferumoxtran, with dextran-coated Fe3O4 MNPs, has also been approved through significant changes in the MR signal intensity of the blood pool and well-perfused organs (liver and spleen) that were noted on both nuclear magnetization T1- and T2-weighted images in a clinical trial [133]. Next, carboxydextran-coated Fe3O4 MNPs with ferucarbotran (VivoTrax) has recently shown efficacy in a multicenter clinical trial on sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) biopsy involving 220 breast cancer patients where ferucarbotran exceeded the threshold identification of SLN of 94.8% [134]. An exploratory clinical study has been conducted to lower the dose of ferucarbotran, and the results showed that a 0.5 ml dose was sufficient for SLN identification [135].
Harnessing the capability of Fe3O4 MNPs in immunomagnetic separation (IMS) techniques has led to the discovery of various biomarkers in biomedical research. One of the FDA-approved Fe3O4 MNPs for IMS techniques is the CELLSEARCH system from Janssen Diagnostics Inc. for metastatic breast cancer, metastatic colorectal cancer, and prostate cancer [136]. Another FDA-approved IMS system is the CliniMACS CD34 Reagent System by Miltenyi Biotec utilizing the anti-CD34 for clinical allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia [137]. Lastly, magnetic fluid hyperthermia (MHF) using Fe3O4 MNPs is a promising approach to cancer therapy [138] by producing sufficient heat to kill cancer cells. In 2018, the FDA approval of MHF NanoTherm therapy built by MagForce was accelerated after a clinical trial with prostate cancer patients [137].

5. Conclusions

Numerous studies have shown that Fe3O4 MNPs have strong magnetic characteristics that make them ideal for targeted medication delivery systems. However, Fe3O4 MNPs have the propensity to aggregate and cause toxicity in living organisms. Therefore, applying a polymer to their surfaces to increase biocompatibility and blood half-lives appears to have potential. It can be summarized that using natural polymers on Fe3O4 has gradually reduced their propensity to aggregate while simultaneously improving their biocompatibility and reducing their potential toxicity. On the other hand, these advantageous characteristics can be compromised by larger particle sizes and diminished magnetic properties.
Despite the fact that natural polymeric Fe3O4 MNPs composites have several benefits for drug delivery applications, there are still significant difficulties with clinical applications. The efficacy of naturally polymeric Fe3O4 MNPs in vivo is currently unsatisfactory due to the fact that the majority of drug-delivery systems are examined in vitro. Therefore, in vivo testing should be progressively included in future studies. Additionally, in vivo conditions will be very difficult for natural polymeric Fe3O4 MNPs with weak physicochemical qualities. For example, natural polymeric Fe3O4 MNPs with poor magnetism characteristics in vivo find it hard to respond to EMFs. However, inappropriately boosting the amount of Fe3O4 MNPs in the polymer matrix might be hazardous to human health and compromise other qualities of intelligent responses, such as pH sensitivity. To enhance their applicability in the challenging physiological environment in vivo, more natural polymeric Fe3O4 MNPs should be designed with a sensible structure and chemical composition. More critically, additional research is needed to generate natural polymeric Fe3O4 MNPs with improved safety.
Moreover, we anticipate that the dual- and triple-response Fe3O4 MNPs based on natural polymers for drug delivery will play a more important role in the field of material application in the future. Additionally, biomimetic nanotechnology has recently attracted attention with its notion of wrapping polymeric nanoparticles (NPs) with cell membranes; for example, they were extracted from the cancer cell membranes. This has resulted in multi-immune responses to different tumor antigens attributable to receptor–ligand interactions in surface cells, thereby enhancing biological adhesion and immune clearance. The building of innovative structures that have the capability of mimicking the functionalities of biological components in order to maximize biointerfacing and biological cue manipulation. This biomimetic concept can be adopted and further improved by using cancer cell membrane-based wrapped Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles with the polymers for cancer vaccine design and therapy development.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.H.N., Z.A. and S.M.N.H.; validation, A.H.N. and Z.A.; investigation, A.H.N. and S.M.N.H.; writing—original draft preparation, A.H.N., Z.A., S.M.N.H., R.A.I., A.K.A., N.I., M.L.N., N.N. and N.H.S.; writing—review and editing, A.H.N., Z.A., S.M.N.H., W.N., A.S.N., M.S.M.A., A.K.A. and N.I.; funding acquisition, N.I. and A.K.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors would like to express gratitude for the financial support received from the Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, project “The impact of Malaysian bamboos’ chemical and fiber characteristics on their pulp and paper properties, grant number PY/2022/02318-Q.J130000.3851.21H99”. The research has been conducted under the program Research Excellence Consortium (JPT(BPKI)1000/016/018/25(57)) provided by the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (MOHE).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The first author, Abu Hassan Nordin (A.H.N.), wishes to express his heartfelt gratitude to Universiti Teknologi Malaysia for their financial assistance provided under the Zamalah scholarship scheme.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hrubý, M.; Filippov, S.K.; Štěpánek, P. Smart polymers in drug delivery systems on crossroads: Which way deserves following? Eur. Polym. J. 2015, 65, 82–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jain, K.K. Drug Delivery Systems—An Overview; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2008; pp. 1–50. [Google Scholar]
  3. Luten, J.; van Nostrum, C.F.; De Smedt, S.C.; Hennink, W.E. Biodegradable polymers as non-viral carriers for plasmid DNA delivery. J. Control. Release 2008, 126, 97–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gopi, S.; Amalraj, A.; Thomas, S. Effective drug delivery system of biopolymers based on nanomaterials and hydrogels—A review. Drug Des. 2016, 5, 2169-0138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yang, Y.-Y.; Wang, Y.; Powell, R.; Chan, P. Polymeric core-shell nanoparticles for therapeutics. Res. J. Pharm. Dos. Forms Technol. 2006, 33, 557–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Tong, X.; Pan, W.; Su, T.; Zhang, M.; Dong, W.; Qi, X. Recent advances in natural polymer-based drug delivery systems. React. Funct. Polym. 2020, 148, 104501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gaspar-Pintiliescu, A.; Stanciuc, A.-M.; Craciunescu, O. Natural composite dressings based on collagen, gelatin and plant bioactive compounds for wound healing: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 138, 854–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bangar, B.; Shinde, N.; Deshmukh, S.; Kale, B. Natural polymers in drug delivery development. Res. J. Pharm. Dos. Forms Technol. 2014, 6, 54–57. [Google Scholar]
  9. Eslahi, N.; Mahmoodi, A.; Mahmoudi, N.; Zandi, N.; Simchi, A. Processing and properties of nanofibrous bacterial cellulose-containing polymer composites: A review of recent advances for biomedical applications. Polym. Rev. 2020, 60, 144–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bajpai, A.K.; Shukla, S.K.; Bhanu, S.; Kankane, S. Responsive polymers in controlled drug delivery. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2008, 33, 1088–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liao, J.; Huang, H. Temperature/pH dual sensitive Hericium erinaceus residue carboxymethyl chitin/poly (N-isopropyl acrylamide) sequential IPN hydrogels. Cellulose 2020, 27, 825–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Omidi, S.; Pirhayati, M.; Kakanejadifard, A. Co-delivery of doxorubicin and curcumin by a pH-sensitive, injectable, and In Situ hydrogel composed of chitosan, graphene, and cellulose nanowhisker. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 231, 115745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhao, J.; Liang, X.; Cao, H.; Tan, T. Preparation of injectable hydrogel with near-infrared light response and photo-controlled drug release. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2020, 7, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Oktay, S.; Alemdar, N. Electrically controlled release of 5-fluorouracil from conductive gelatin methacryloyl-based hydrogels. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136, 46914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lin, F.; Zheng, J.; Guo, W.; Zhu, Z.; Wang, Z.; Dong, B.; Lin, C.; Huang, B.; Lu, B. Smart cellulose-derived magnetic hydrogel with rapid swelling and deswelling properties for remotely controlled drug release. Cellulose 2019, 26, 6861–6877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hu, X.; Nian, G.; Liang, X.; Wu, L.; Yin, T.; Lu, H.; Qu, S.; Yang, W. Adhesive tough magnetic hydrogels with high Fe3O4 content. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 10292–10300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Patel, J.K.; Patel, A.P. Passive targeting of nanoparticles to cancer. In Surface Modification of Nanoparticles for Targeted Drug Delivery; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 125–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jain, A.K.; Das, M.; Swarnakar, N.K.; Jain, S. Engineered PLGA nanoparticles: An emerging delivery tool in cancer therapeutics. Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carr. Syst. 2011, 28, 1–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jain, K. Nanotechnology-based drug delivery for cancer. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2005, 4, 407–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Su, K.; Wang, C. Recent advances in the use of gelatin in biomedical research. Biotechnol. Lett. 2015, 37, 2139–2145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Campiglio, C.E.; Contessi Negrini, N.; Farè, S.; Draghi, L. Cross-linking strategies for electrospun gelatin scaffolds. Materials 2019, 12, 2476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, Y.-J.; Cheng, H.-W.; Yen, W.-Y.; Tsai, J.-H.; Yeh, C.-Y.; Chen, C.-J.; Liu, J.T.; Chen, S.-Y.; Chang, S.-J. The Treatment of Keloid Scars via Modulating Heterogeneous Gelatin-Structured Composite Microneedles to Control Transdermal Dual-Drug Release. Polymers 2022, 14, 4436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yang, S.-W.; Chen, Y.-J.; Chen, C.-J.; Liu, J.-T.; Yang, C.-Y.; Tsai, J.-H.; Lu, H.-E.; Chen, S.-Y.; Chang, S.-J. High-Density Horizontal Stacking of Chondrocytes via the Synergy of Biocompatible Magnetic Gelatin Nanocarriers and Internal Magnetic Navigation for Enhancing Cartilage Repair. Polymers 2022, 14, 809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Rachmawati, H.; Al Shaal, L.; Müller, R.H.; Keck, C.M. Development of curcumin nanocrystal: Physical aspects. J. Pharm. Sci. 2013, 102, 204–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhou, X.; Luo, Z.; Baidya, A.; Kim, H.J.; Wang, C.; Jiang, X.; Qu, M.; Zhu, J.; Ren, L.; Vajhadin, F.; et al. Biodegradable β-Cyclodextrin Conjugated Gelatin Methacryloyl Microneedle for Delivery of Water-Insoluble Drug. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2020, 9, e2000527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Verma, G.; Gajipara, A.; Shelar, S.B.; Priyadarsini, K.I.; Hassan, P.A. Development of water-dispersible gelatin stabilized hydroxyapatite nanoformulation for curcumin delivery. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2021, 66, 102769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jaberifard, F.; Arsalani, N.; Ghorbani, M.; Mostafavi, H. Incorporating halloysite nanotube/carvedilol nanohybrids into gelatin microsphere as a novel oral pH-sensitive drug delivery system. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2022, 637, 128122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pasomboon, P.; Chumnanpuen, P.; E-Kobon, T. Modified Genome-Scale Metabolic Model of Escherichia coli by Adding Hyaluronic Acid Biosynthesis-Related Enzymes (GLMU2 and HYAD) from Pasteurella multocida. Int. J. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2021, 15, 54–58. [Google Scholar]
  29. Buckley, C.; Murphy, E.J.; Montgomery, T.R.; Major, I. Hyaluronic acid: A review of the drug delivery capabilities of this naturally occurring polysaccharide. Polymers 2022, 14, 3442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Marinho, A.; Nunes, C.; Reis, S. Hyaluronic Acid: A Key Ingredient in the Therapy of Inflammation. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yaghobi, Z.; Movassaghpour, A.; Talebi, M.; Shadbad, M.A.; Hajiasgharzadeh, K.; Pourvahdani, S.; Baradaran, B. The role of CD44 in cancer chemoresistance: A concise review. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2021, 903, 174147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hu, X.; Hou, B.; Xu, Z.; Saeed, M.; Sun, F.; Gao, Z.; Lai, Y.; Zhu, T.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, W. Supramolecular prodrug nanovectors for active tumor targeting and combination immunotherapy of colorectal cancer. Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 1903332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yan, K.; Feng, Y.; Gao, K.; Shi, X.; Zhao, X. Fabrication of hyaluronic acid-based micelles with glutathione-responsiveness for targeted anticancer drug delivery. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 606, 1586–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mo, X.; Wu, F.; Li, Y.; Cai, X. Hyaluronic acid-functionalized halloysite nanotubes for targeted drug delivery to CD44-overexpressing cancer cells. Mater. Today Commun. 2021, 28, 102682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Curcio, M.; Diaz-Gomez, L.; Cirillo, G.; Nicoletta, F.P.; Leggio, A.; Iemma, F. Dual-targeted hyaluronic acid/albumin micelle-like nanoparticles for the vectorization of doxorubicin. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kim, M.J.; Seong, K.-Y.; Kim, D.S.; Jeong, J.S.; Kim, S.Y.; Lee, S.; Yang, S.Y.; An, B.-S. Minoxidil-loaded hyaluronic acid dissolving microneedles to alleviate hair loss in an alopecia animal model. Act. Biomater. 2022, 143, 189–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Noreen, S.; Pervaiz, F.; Ijaz, M.; Shoukat, H. Synthesis and characterization of pH-sensitive chemically crosslinked block copolymer [Hyaluronic acid/Poloxamer 407-co-poly (Methacrylic acid)] hydrogels for colon targeting. Polym. Plast. Technol. Mater. 2022, 61, 1071–1087. [Google Scholar]
  38. Jo, Y.-J.; Gulfam, M.; Jo, S.-H.; Gal, Y.-S.; Oh, C.-W.; Park, S.-H.; Lim, K.T. Multi-stimuli responsive hydrogels derived from hyaluronic acid for cancer therapy application. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 286, 119303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, F.; Pei, X.; Peng, X.; Gou, D.; Fan, X.; Zheng, X.; Song, C.; Zhou, Y.; Cui, S. Dual crosslinking of folic acid-modified pectin nanoparticles for enhanced oral insulin delivery. Biomater. Adv. 2022, 135, 212746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shi, X.; Cui, S.; Song, X.; Rickel, A.P.; Sanyour, H.J.; Zheng, J.; Hu, J.; Hong, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, Y. Gelatin-crosslinked pectin nanofiber mats allowing cell infiltration. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2020, 112, 110941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bostanudin, M.F.; Arafat, M.; Tan, S.F.; Sarker, M.Z.I. Investigations of pectin nanostructures for enhanced percutaneous delivery of fusidic acid. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2022, 139, e52760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Aroui, S.; Kenani, A. Cell-penetrating peptides: A challenge for drug delivery. In Cheminformatics and Its Applications; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  43. Falcão, L.d.S.; Coelho, D.B.; Veggi, P.C.; Campelo, P.H.; Albuquerque, P.M.; de Moraes, M.A. Starch as a Matrix for Incorporation and Release of Bioactive Compounds: Fundamentals and Applications. Polymers 2022, 14, 2361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ranjbar, E.; Namazi, H.; Pooresmaeil, M. Carboxymethyl starch encapsulated 5-FU and DOX co-loaded layered double hydroxide for evaluation of its In Vitro performance as a drug delivery agent. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 201, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Xu, C.; Chen, S.; Chen, C.; Ming, Y.; Du, J.; Mu, J.; Luo, F.; Huang, D.; Wang, N.; Lin, Z.; et al. Colon-targeted oral nanoparticles based on ROS-scavenging hydroxyethyl starch-curcumin conjugates for efficient inflammatory bowel disease therapy. Int. J. Pharm. 2022, 623, 121884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Fonseca, L.M.; Bona, N.P.; Crizel, R.L.; Pedra, N.S.; Stefanello, F.M.; Lim, L.T.; Carreño, N.L.V.; Dias, A.R.G.; Zavareze, E.d.R. Electrospun Starch Nanofibers as a Delivery Carrier for Carvacrol as Anti-Glioma Agent. Starch Stärke 2022, 74, 2100115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Dumitriu, S. Polysaccharides: Structural Diversity and Functional Versatility; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  48. Patel, J.; Maji, B.; Moorthy, N.S.H.N.; Maiti, S. Xanthan gum derivatives: Review of synthesis, properties and diverse applications. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 27103–27136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Liu, Z.; Yao, P. Injectable shear-thinning xanthan gum hydrogel reinforced by mussel-inspired secondary crosslinking. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 103292–103301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kumar, A.; Rao, K.M.; Han, S.S. Application of xanthan gum as polysaccharide in tissue engineering: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 180, 128–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Patel, J.; Maiti, S.; Moorthy, N.S.H.N. Repaglinide-laden hydrogel particles of xanthan gum derivatives for the management of diabetes. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 287, 119354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Shukla, A.; Bhatt, N. Formulation and evaluation of glibenclamide loaded mouth dissolving films with xanthan gum as film forming polymer. Eur. J. Mol. Clin. Med. 2021, 8, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  53. Kumar, P.; Gupta, R.K. Formulation and Characterization of Mouth Dissolving Films of Amlodipine using Natural Polymer. Res. J. Pharm. Technol. 2022, 15, 3651–3655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Alam, A.; Jawaid, T.; Alsanad, S.M.; Kamal, M.; Rawat, P.; Singh, V.; Alam, P.; Alam, P. Solubility Enhancement, Formulation Development, and Antibacterial Activity of Xanthan-Gum-Stabilized Colloidal Gold Nanogel of Hesperidin against Proteus vulgaris. Gels 2022, 8, 655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Hu, Q.; Lu, Y.; Luo, Y. Recent advances in dextran-based drug delivery systems: From fabrication strategies to applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 264, 117999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Heinze, T.; Liebert, T.; Heublein, B.; Hornig, S. Functional polymers based on dextran. In Polysaccharides II; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; pp. 199–291. [Google Scholar]
  57. Massia, S.P.; Stark, J.; Letbetter, D.S. Surface-immobilized dextran limits cell adhesion and spreading. Biomaterials 2000, 21, 2253–2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Lévesque, S.G.; Shoichet, M.S. Synthesis of cell-adhesive dextran hydrogels and macroporous scaffolds. Biomaterials 2006, 27, 5277–5285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Maity, S.; Saha, S.; Sarkar, S.; Kumar, P.; Gautam, A.K.; Sonkar, A.B. Chapter 12—Dextran-based nanomaterials in drug delivery applications. In Biopolymer-Based Nanomaterials in Drug Delivery and Biomedical Applications; Bera, H., Hossain, C.M., Saha, S., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; pp. 293–312. [Google Scholar]
  60. Entzian, K.; Aigner, A. Drug delivery by ultrasound-responsive nanocarriers for cancer treatment. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Wei, P.; Cornel, E.J.; Du, J. Ultrasound-responsive polymer-based drug delivery systems. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2021, 11, 1323–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zamani, R.; Bizari, D.; Heiat, M. Synthesis and characterization of phase shift dextran stabilized nanodroplets for ultrasound-induced cancer therapy: A novel nanobiotechnology approach. J. Biotechnol. 2022, 350, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhu, Q.; Xiao, S.; Hua, Z.; Yang, D.; Hu, M.; Zhu, Y.-T.; Zhong, H. Near infrared (NIR) light therapy of eye diseases: A review. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2021, 18, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Luo, J.; Ma, Z.; Yang, F.; Wu, T.; Wen, S.; Zhang, J.; Huang, L.; Deng, S.; Tan, S. Fabrication of Laponite-Reinforced Dextran-Based Hydrogels for NIR-Responsive Controlled Drug Release. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2022, 8, 1554–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Yu, C.; Liu, H.; Guo, C.; Chen, Q.; Su, Y.; Guo, H.; Hou, X.; Zhao, F.; Fan, H.; Xu, H.; et al. Dextran sulfate-based MMP-2 enzyme-sensitive SR-A receptor targeting nanomicelles for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Drug Deliv. 2022, 29, 454–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Liu, P.; Huang, P.; Kang, E.-T. pH-Sensitive Dextran-Based Micelles from Copper-Free Click Reaction for Antitumor Drug Delivery. Langmuir 2021, 37, 12990–12999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Liu, F.; Urban, M.W. Recent advances and challenges in designing stimuli-responsive polymers. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2010, 35, 3–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Shiraishi, Y.; Miyamoto, R.; Hirai, T.J.O.L. Spiropyran-conjugated thermoresponsive copolymer as a colorimetric thermometer with linear and reversible color change. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 1571–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Mandal, D.; Maran, A.; Yaszemski, M.J.; Bolander, M.E.; Sarkar, G. Cellular uptake of gold nanoparticles directly cross-linked with carrier peptides by osteosarcoma cells. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2009, 20, 347–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Chandrakala, V.; Aruna, V.; Angajala, G. Review on metal nanoparticles as nanocarriers: Current challenges and perspectives in drug delivery systems. Emergent Mater. 2022, 5, 1593–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Park, J.H.; Saravanakumar, G.; Kim, K.; Kwon, I.C. Targeted delivery of low molecular drugs using chitosan and its derivatives. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2010, 62, 28–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ito, A.; Shinkai, M.; Honda, H.; Kobayashi, T. Medical application of functionalized magnetic nanoparticles. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2005, 100, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Shapiro, B. Towards dynamic control of magnetic fields to focus magnetic carriers to targets deep inside the body. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2009, 321, 1594–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wang, M.; Thanou, M. Targeting nanoparticles to cancer. Pharmacol. Res. 2010, 62, 90–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Xu, C.; Sun, S. New forms of superparamagnetic nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2013, 65, 732–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Pankhurst, Q.A.; Connolly, J.; Jones, S.K.; Dobson, J. Applications of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedicine. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2003, 36, R167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Namdeo, M.; Saxena, S.; Tankhiwale, R.; Bajpai, M.; Mohan, Y.á.; Bajpai, S. Magnetic nanoparticles for drug delivery applications. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2008, 8, 3247–3271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Schneider-Futschik, E.K.; Reyes-Ortega, F. Advantages and disadvantages of using magnetic nanoparticles for the treatment of complicated ocular disorders. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Chen, T.; Guo, X.; Liu, X.; Shi, S.; Wang, J.; Shi, C.; Qian, Z.; Zhou, S. A strategy in the design of micellar shape for cancer therapy. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2012, 1, 214–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Barua, S.; Mitragotri, S. Synergistic targeting of cell membrane, cytoplasm, and nucleus of cancer cells using rod-shaped nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 9558–9570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Chen, J.; Clay, N.E.; Park, N.-h.; Kong, H. Non-spherical particles for targeted drug delivery. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2015, 125, 20–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wahajuddin; Arora, S. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: Magnetic nanoplatforms as drug carriers. Int. J. Nanomed. 2012, 7, 3445–3471. [Google Scholar]
  83. Yew, Y.P.; Shameli, K.; Miyake, M.; Khairudin, N.B.B.A.; Mohamad, S.E.B.; Naiki, T.; Lee, K.X. Green biosynthesis of superparamagnetic magnetite Fe3O4 nanoparticles and biomedical applications in targeted anticancer drug delivery system: A review. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 13, 2287–2308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zhang, N.; Jia, C.; Ma, X.; Li, J.; Wang, S.; Yue, B.; Huang, M. Hierarchical Core–Shell Fe3O4@ mSiO2@ Chitosan Nanoparticles for pH-Responsive Drug Delivery. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2021, 21, 3020–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Shahin, R.; Yousefi, M.; Ziyadi, H.; Bikhof, M.; Hekmati, M. pH-Responsive and magnetic Fe3O4@UiO-66-NH2@PEI nanocomposite as drug nanocarrier: Loading and release study of Imatinib. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2023, 147, 110186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Javanbakht, S.; Shadi, M.; Mohammadian, R.; Shaabani, A.; Ghorbani, M.; Rabiee, G.; Amini, M.M. Preparation of Fe3O4@SiO2@Tannic acid double core-shell magnetic nanoparticles via the Ugi multicomponent reaction strategy as a pH-responsive co-delivery of doxorubicin and methotrexate. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 247, 122857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Lu, A.H.; Salabas, E.e.L.; Schüth, F. Magnetic nanoparticles: Synthesis, protection, functionalization, and application. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 1222–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Issa, B.; Obaidat, I.M.; Albiss, B.A.; Haik, Y. Magnetic nanoparticles: Surface effects and properties related to biomedicine applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 21266–21305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Panda, J.; Satapathy, B.S.; Majumder, S.; Sarkar, R.; Mukherjee, B.; Tudu, B. Engineered polymeric iron oxide nanoparticles as potential drug carrier for targeted delivery of docetaxel to breast cancer cells. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2019, 485, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Khan, S.; Shah, Z.H.; Riaz, S.; Ahmad, N.; Islam, S.; Raza, M.A.; Naseem, S. Antimicrobial activity of citric acid functionalized iron oxide nanoparticles –Superparamagnetic effect. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 10942–10951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Sirivat, A.; Paradee, N. Facile synthesis of gelatin-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticle: Effect of pH in single-step co-precipitation for cancer drug loading. Mater. Des. 2019, 181, 107942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Dorniani, D.; Hussein, M.Z.B.; Kura, A.U.; Fakurazi, S.; Shaari, A.H.; Ahmad, Z. Preparation of Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles coated with gallic acid for drug delivery. Int. J. Nanomed. 2012, 7, 5745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Vangara, K.K.; Liu, J.L.; Palakurthi, S. Hyaluronic acid-decorated PLGA-PEG nanoparticles for targeted delivery of SN-38 to ovarian cancer. Anticancer Res. 2013, 33, 2425–2434. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  94. Mattheolabakis, G.; Milane, L.; Singh, A.; Amiji, M.M. Hyaluronic acid targeting of CD44 for cancer therapy: From receptor biology to nanomedicine. J. Drug Target. 2015, 23, 605–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Fang, Z.; Li, X.; Xu, Z.; Du, F.; Wang, W.; Shi, R.; Gao, D. Hyaluronic acid-modified mesoporous silica-coated superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019, 14, 5785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Viratchaiboott, N.; Sakunpongpitiporn, P.; Niamlang, S.; Sirivat, A. Release of 5-FU loaded pectin/Fe3O4 from porous PBSA matrix under magnetic and electric fields. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 906, 164239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Guilherme, M.R.; Oliveira, R.S.; Mauricio, M.R.; Cellet, T.S.; Pereira, G.M.; Kunita, M.H.; Muniz, E.C.; Rubira, A.F. Albumin release from a brain-resembling superabsorbent magnetic hydrogel based on starch. Soft Matter 2012, 8, 6629–6637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Bueno, P.V.; Hilamatu, K.C.; Carmona-Ribeiro, A.M.; Petri, D.F. Magnetically triggered release of amoxicillin from xanthan/Fe3O4/albumin patches. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 115, 792–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Sugumaran, A.; Sadhasivam, J.; Gawas, P.; Nutalapati, V.; Pandian, R.; Perumal, S.K. Curcumin conjugated dextran coated Fe3O4 Nanoparticles: Cytotoxic effect on lung cancer cell line A549. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2022, 286, 116047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Almeida, E.A.; Bellettini, I.C.; Garcia, F.P.; Farinácio, M.T.; Nakamura, C.V.; Rubira, A.F.; Martins, A.F.; Muniz, E.C. Curcumin-loaded dual pH-and thermo-responsive magnetic microcarriers based on pectin maleate for drug delivery. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 171, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Mohammadi, R.; Saboury, A.; Javanbakht, S.; Foroutan, R.; Shaabani, A. Carboxymethylcellulose/polyacrylic acid/starch-modified Fe3O4 interpenetrating magnetic nanocomposite hydrogel beads as pH-sensitive carrier for oral anticancer drug delivery system. Eur. Polym. J. 2021, 153, 110500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Chenthamara, D.; Subramaniam, S.; Ramakrishnan, S.G.; Krishnaswamy, S.; Essa, M.M.; Lin, F.-H.; Qoronfleh, M.W. Therapeutic efficacy of nanoparticles and routes of administration. Biomater. Res. 2019, 23, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Tian, X.; Wang, D.; Feng, S.; Zhang, L.; Ji, X.; Wang, Z.; Lu, Q.; Xi, C.; Pi, L.; Zhang, X. Effects of 3.5–23.0 T static magnetic fields on mice: A safety study. Neuroimage 2019, 199, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Zablotskii, V.; Lunov, O.; Novotna, B.; Churpita, O.; Trošan, P.; Holáň, V.; Sykova, E.; Dejneka, A.; Kubinová, Š. Down-regulation of adipogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells by oscillating high-gradient magnetic fields and mechanical vibration. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 105, 103702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Oliveira, F.T.P.; Diedrichsen, J.; Verstynen, T.; Duque, J.; Ivry, R.B. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of posterior parietal cortex affects decisions of hand choice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 17751–17756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Bhardwaj, A.; Parekh, K.; Jain, N. In Vitro hyperthermic effect of magnetic fluid on cervical and breast cancer cells. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 15249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Tkáč, I.; Benneyworth, M.A.; Nichols-Meade, T.; Steuer, E.L.; Larson, S.N.; Metzger, G.J.; Uğurbil, K. Long-term behavioral effects observed in mice chronically exposed to static ultra-high magnetic fields. Magn. Reson. Med. 2021, 86, 1544–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Zhang, L.; Hou, Y.; Li, Z.; Ji, X.; Wang, Z.; Wang, H.; Tian, X.; Yu, F.; Yang, Z.; Pi, L. 27 T ultra-high static magnetic field changes orientation and morphology of mitotic spindles in human cells. eLife 2017, 6, e22911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Huang, C.-H.; Chuang, T.-J.; Ke, C.-J.; Yao, C.-H. Doxorubicin–gelatin/Fe3O4–alginate dual-layer magnetic nanoparticles as targeted anticancer drug delivery vehicles. Polymers 2020, 12, 1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Dutta, B.; Shelar, S.B.; Rajan, V.; Checker, S.; Barick, K.; Pandey, B.; Kumar, S.; Hassan, P. Gelatin grafted Fe3O4 based curcumin nanoformulation for cancer therapy. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2022, 67, 102974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Pooresmaeil, M.; Namazi, H. pH-sensitive ternary Fe3O4/GQDs@ G hybrid microspheres; Synthesis, characterization and drug delivery application. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 846, 156419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Jahanban-Esfahlan, R.; Derakhshankhah, H.; Haghshenas, B.; Massoumi, B.; Abbasian, M.; Jaymand, M. A bio-inspired magnetic natural hydrogel containing gelatin and alginate as a drug delivery system for cancer chemotherapy. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 156, 438–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Liang, W.; Huang, Y.; Lu, D.; Ma, X.; Gong, T.; Cui, X.; Yu, B.; Yang, C.; Dong, C.; Shuang, S. β-cyclodextrin–hyaluronic acid polymer functionalized magnetic graphene oxide nanocomposites for targeted photo-chemotherapy of tumor cells. Polymers 2019, 11, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Gong, T.; Dong, Z.; Fu, Y.; Gong, T.; Deng, L.; Zhang, Z. Hyaluronic acid modified doxorubicin loaded Fe3O4 nanoparticles effectively inhibit breast cancer metastasis. J. Mater. Chem. B 2019, 7, 5861–5872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Soleymani, M.; Velashjerdi, M.; Shaterabadi, Z.; Barati, A. One-pot preparation of hyaluronic acid-coated iron oxide nanoparticles for magnetic hyperthermia therapy and targeting CD44-overexpressing cancer cells. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 237, 116130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Wen, C.; Cheng, R.; Gong, T.; Huang, Y.; Li, D.; Zhao, X.; Yu, B.; Su, D.; Song, Z.; Liang, W. β-Cyclodextrin-cholic acid-hyaluronic acid polymer coated Fe3O4-graphene oxide nanohybrids as local chemo-photothermal synergistic agents for enhanced liver tumor therapy. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2021, 199, 111510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Liang, J.; Yang, X.; Liu, D.; Cong, M.; Song, Y.; Bai, S. Lipid/hyaluronic acid–Coated Doxorubicin-Fe3O4 as a dual-targeting nanoparticle for enhanced cancer therapy. AAPS Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2020, 21, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Wang, C.; Li, G.; Karmakar, B.; AlSalem, H.S.; Shati, A.A.; El-kott, A.F.; Elsaid, F.G.; Bani-Fwaz, M.Z.; Alsayegh, A.A.; Alkhayyat, S.S. Pectin mediated green synthesis of Fe3O4/Pectin nanoparticles under ultrasound condition as an anti-human colorectal carcinoma bionanocomposite. Arab. J. Chem. 2022, 15, 103867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Wong, S.T.S.; Kamari, A.; Yusoff, S.N.M.; Hussein, M.Z.; Othman, H.; Ali, N.M.; Phillip, E. Gellan gum and pectin-functionalised magnetic graphene oxide nanocomposites as nanocarriers for permethrin to control mosquito larvae. Polym. Bull. 2022, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Işıklan, N.; Polat, S. Synthesis and characterization of thermo/pH-sensitive pectin-graft-poly (dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate) coated magnetic nanoparticles. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 4499–4515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Ji, N.; Dong, C.; Jiang, J. Evaluation of antioxidant, cytotoxicity, and anti-ovarian cancer properties of the Fe3O4@ CS-Starch/Cu bio-nanocomposite. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2022, 140, 109452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Forouzandehdel, S.; Forouzandehdel, S.; Rami, M.R. Synthesis of a novel magnetic starch-alginic acid-based biomaterial for drug delivery. Carbohydr. Res. 2020, 487, 107889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Naseri, N.; Iranshahi, M.; Rakhshani, S.; Mohtashami, L. Enhanced cytotoxicity of auraptene to prostate cancer cells by dextran-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Nanomed. J. 2022, 9, 77–86. [Google Scholar]
  124. Zhang, Q.; Liu, Q.; Du, M.; Vermorken, A.; Cui, Y.; Zhang, L.; Guo, L.; Ma, L.; Chen, M. Cetuximab and Doxorubicin loaded dextran-coated Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles as novel targeted nanocarriers for non-small cell lung cancer. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2019, 481, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Wang, F.; Li, X.; Li, W.; Bai, H.; Gao, Y.; Ma, J.; Liu, W.; Xi, G. Dextran coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles as a near-infrared laser-driven photothermal agent for efficient ablation of cancer cells In Vitro and In Vivo. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2018, 90, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. He, L.; Zheng, R.; Min, J.; Lu, F.; Wu, C.; Zhi, Y.; Shan, S.; Su, H. Preparation of magnetic microgels based on dextran for stimuli-responsive release of doxorubicin. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2021, 517, 167394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Lübbe, A.S.; Bergemann, C.; Riess, H.; Schriever, F.; Reichardt, P.; Possinger, K.; Matthias, M.; Dörken, B.; Herrmann, F.; Gürtler, R. Clinical experiences with magnetic drug targeting: A phase I study with 4′-epidoxorubicin in 14 patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Res. 1996, 56, 4686–4693. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  128. Koda, J.; Venook, A.; Walser, E.; Goodwin, S. A multicenter, phase I/II trial of hepatic intra-arterial delivery of doxorubicin hydrochloride adsorbed to magnetic targeted carriers in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur. J. Cancer 2002, 38, S18. [Google Scholar]
  129. Wilson, M.W.; Kerlan Jr, R.K.; Fidelman, N.A.; Venook, A.P.; LaBerge, J.M.; Koda, J.; Gordon, R.L. Hepatocellular carcinoma: Regional therapy with a magnetic targeted carrier bound to doxorubicin in a dual MR imaging/conventional angiography suite—Initial experience with four patients. Radiology 2004, 230, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Bartolozzi, C.; Lencioni, R.; Donati, F.; Cioni, D. Abdominal MR: Liver and pancreas. Eur. Radiol. 1999, 9, 1496–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Senéterre, E.; Taourel, P.; Bouvier, Y.; Pradel, J.; Van Beers, B.; Daures, J.-P.; Pringot, J.; Mathieu, D.; Bruel, J.-M. Detection of hepatic metastases: Ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging versus unenhanced MR imaging and CT during arterial portography. Radiology 1996, 200, 785–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Ros, P.R.; Freeny, P.C.; Harms, S.E.; Seltzer, S.E.; Davis, P.L.; Chan, T.W.; Stillman, A.E.; Muroff, L.R.; Runge, V.M.; Nissenbaum, M.A. Hepatic MR imaging with ferumoxides: A multicenter clinical trial of the safety and efficacy in the detection of focal hepatic lesions. Radiology 1995, 196, 481–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. McLachlan, S.J.; Morris, M.R.; Lucas, M.A.; Fisco, R.A.; Eakins, M.N.; Fowler, D.R.; Scheetz, R.B.; Olukotun, A.Y. Phase I clinical evaluation of a new iron oxide MR contrast agent. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging JMRI 1994, 4, 301–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Taruno, K.; Kurita, T.; Kuwahata, A.; Yanagihara, K.; Enokido, K.; Katayose, Y.; Nakamura, S.; Takei, H.; Sekino, M.; Kusakabe, M. Multicenter clinical trial on sentinel lymph node biopsy using superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles and a novel handheld magnetic probe. J. Surg. Oncol. 2019, 120, 1391–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Taruno, K.; Kuwahata, A.; Sekino, M.; Nakagawa, T.; Kurita, T.; Enokido, K.; Nakamura, S.; Takei, H.; Kusakabe, M. Exploratory Study of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Dose Optimization in Breast Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node Identification Using a Handheld Magnetic Probe and Iron Quantitation. Cancers 2022, 14, 1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Wang, L.; Balasubramanian, P.; Chen, A.P.; Kummar, S.; Evrard, Y.A.; Kinders, R.J. Promise and limits of the CellSearch platform for evaluating pharmacodynamics in circulating tumor cells. Semin. Oncol. 2016, 43, 464–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Etemadi, H.; Buchanan, J.K.; Kandile, N.G.; Plieger, P.G. Iron Oxide Nanoparticles: Physicochemical Characteristics and Historical Developments to Commercialization for Potential Technological Applications. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 7, 5432–5450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Kaushik, S.; Thomas, J.; Panwar, V.; Ali, H.; Chopra, V.; Sharma, A.; Tomar, R.; Ghosh, D. In Situ biosynthesized superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONS) induce efficient hyperthermia in cancer cells. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2020, 3, 779–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. A brief history of the development of natural polymer applications in drug delivery systems. 5-FU: 5-fluorouracil; DTT: dithiothreitol; FDA: food drug administration; NIR: near infrared radiation; NPs: nanoparticles.
Figure 1. A brief history of the development of natural polymer applications in drug delivery systems. 5-FU: 5-fluorouracil; DTT: dithiothreitol; FDA: food drug administration; NIR: near infrared radiation; NPs: nanoparticles.
Gels 09 00121 g001
Figure 2. General mechanism of delivering drugs to the targeted cell by natural polymer.
Figure 2. General mechanism of delivering drugs to the targeted cell by natural polymer.
Gels 09 00121 g002
Figure 3. Schematic representation of the amphiphilic gelatin nanocarrier loaded with quercetin preparation and the mechanism of drug release. Keloid scarring can be treated by the transdermal delivery of drug combinations (Qu and gallic acids) via actions of gelatin-based MN composite heterogeneously. Adapted from Chen et al. [22].
Figure 3. Schematic representation of the amphiphilic gelatin nanocarrier loaded with quercetin preparation and the mechanism of drug release. Keloid scarring can be treated by the transdermal delivery of drug combinations (Qu and gallic acids) via actions of gelatin-based MN composite heterogeneously. Adapted from Chen et al. [22].
Gels 09 00121 g003
Figure 4. Illustrative synthesis of multi-responsive HA-derived hydrogel diselenide bonds cleavage mechanism under different triggers and the actions of drug release. Adapted from Jo et al. [38]. DTT: 1,4-dithiothreitol; NIR: Near-infrared.
Figure 4. Illustrative synthesis of multi-responsive HA-derived hydrogel diselenide bonds cleavage mechanism under different triggers and the actions of drug release. Adapted from Jo et al. [38]. DTT: 1,4-dithiothreitol; NIR: Near-infrared.
Gels 09 00121 g004
Figure 5. Synthesis structure of INS/DFAN dual-crosslinked. Adapted from Zhang et al. [39].
Figure 5. Synthesis structure of INS/DFAN dual-crosslinked. Adapted from Zhang et al. [39].
Gels 09 00121 g005
Figure 6. Graphic representation of the LDH(Mg–Al) production, co-drug payload, LDH(Mg-Al)@DOX,5-Fu coating with CMS, and the suggested method for the drug molecule releases from CMS@LDH(Mg–Al)@DOX,5-Fu microspheres. Adapted from Ranjbar et al. [44].
Figure 6. Graphic representation of the LDH(Mg–Al) production, co-drug payload, LDH(Mg-Al)@DOX,5-Fu coating with CMS, and the suggested method for the drug molecule releases from CMS@LDH(Mg–Al)@DOX,5-Fu microspheres. Adapted from Ranjbar et al. [44].
Gels 09 00121 g006
Figure 7. Summary of applications of xanthan gum (XG) in oral and transdermal drug delivery systems (DDS). Oral DDSs can be achieved by incorporating XG-based hydrogel particles loaded with repaglinide to treat type 2 diabetes and XG-based mouth-dissolving films (MDFs) loaded with glibenclamide to treat type 2 diabetes or amlodipine to treat hypertension. Transdermal DDSs can be achieved by incorporating XG-based gel with hesperidin-loaded gold nanoparticles to treat P. vulgaris infection.
Figure 7. Summary of applications of xanthan gum (XG) in oral and transdermal drug delivery systems (DDS). Oral DDSs can be achieved by incorporating XG-based hydrogel particles loaded with repaglinide to treat type 2 diabetes and XG-based mouth-dissolving films (MDFs) loaded with glibenclamide to treat type 2 diabetes or amlodipine to treat hypertension. Transdermal DDSs can be achieved by incorporating XG-based gel with hesperidin-loaded gold nanoparticles to treat P. vulgaris infection.
Gels 09 00121 g007
Figure 8. Multi-responsive dextran-based drug delivery vehicle to deliver doxorubicin (DOX) drug for cancer treatments. DOX is loaded into dextran-based micelles that are responsive to internal stimuli (i.e., changes in the pH tumor environment). DOX also can be loaded into a dextran-based nanodroplet that is responsive to external stimuli such as ultrasound. This multi-responsive DDS allows drugs to be delivered in a more targeted manner such as in tumor cells. The micelles and nanodroplets enter the tumor environment through leaky vasculature. DOX will only be released into the tumor cells upon response to pH changes or ultrasound stimuli.
Figure 8. Multi-responsive dextran-based drug delivery vehicle to deliver doxorubicin (DOX) drug for cancer treatments. DOX is loaded into dextran-based micelles that are responsive to internal stimuli (i.e., changes in the pH tumor environment). DOX also can be loaded into a dextran-based nanodroplet that is responsive to external stimuli such as ultrasound. This multi-responsive DDS allows drugs to be delivered in a more targeted manner such as in tumor cells. The micelles and nanodroplets enter the tumor environment through leaky vasculature. DOX will only be released into the tumor cells upon response to pH changes or ultrasound stimuli.
Gels 09 00121 g008
Figure 9. Schematic of an EMF-influenced magnetic drug delivery system. Adapted from Park et al. [71].
Figure 9. Schematic of an EMF-influenced magnetic drug delivery system. Adapted from Park et al. [71].
Gels 09 00121 g009
Figure 10. Proposed mechanism interaction between Fe3O4, gelatin, and loaded drug. Adapted from Sirivat et al. [91].
Figure 10. Proposed mechanism interaction between Fe3O4, gelatin, and loaded drug. Adapted from Sirivat et al. [91].
Gels 09 00121 g010
Figure 11. A proposed creation of HA-MSNs for targeted cancer treatment in vivo and pH-responsive drug release following specific binding with cancer cells. Adapted from Fang et al. [95].
Figure 11. A proposed creation of HA-MSNs for targeted cancer treatment in vivo and pH-responsive drug release following specific binding with cancer cells. Adapted from Fang et al. [95].
Gels 09 00121 g011
Figure 12. Illustration of (A) 5-fluorouracil-loaded pectin-coated Fe3O4 MNPs; (B) porous poly(butylene succinate co adipate). Adapted from Viratchaiboott et al. [96].
Figure 12. Illustration of (A) 5-fluorouracil-loaded pectin-coated Fe3O4 MNPs; (B) porous poly(butylene succinate co adipate). Adapted from Viratchaiboott et al. [96].
Gels 09 00121 g012
Figure 13. Albumin release from a hydrogel without and with an applied magnetic field: a proposed mechanism. Adapted from Guilherme et al. [97].
Figure 13. Albumin release from a hydrogel without and with an applied magnetic field: a proposed mechanism. Adapted from Guilherme et al. [97].
Gels 09 00121 g013
Figure 14. Mechanism of actions of oral drug and transdermal drug delivery by Fe3O4 MNPs. Oral drug delivery: Oral route administration is achieved by ingesting an oral tablet containing a drug loaded in the natural polymer coated with Fe3O4 MNPs. Stable Fe3O4 MNPs only produce a slow drug release in the stomach but high drug release in the targeted site such as in the colorectal region upon exposure to an external magnetic field (EMF). Transdermal drug delivery: a transdermal patch with the drug loaded in natural polymers coated with Fe3O4 MNPs is placed on the skin, and an EMF is applied to trigger drug release from the Fe3O4 MNPs directly into the bloodstream.
Figure 14. Mechanism of actions of oral drug and transdermal drug delivery by Fe3O4 MNPs. Oral drug delivery: Oral route administration is achieved by ingesting an oral tablet containing a drug loaded in the natural polymer coated with Fe3O4 MNPs. Stable Fe3O4 MNPs only produce a slow drug release in the stomach but high drug release in the targeted site such as in the colorectal region upon exposure to an external magnetic field (EMF). Transdermal drug delivery: a transdermal patch with the drug loaded in natural polymers coated with Fe3O4 MNPs is placed on the skin, and an EMF is applied to trigger drug release from the Fe3O4 MNPs directly into the bloodstream.
Gels 09 00121 g014
Table 1. Summary of studies on gelatin-based DDS.
Table 1. Summary of studies on gelatin-based DDS.
Gelatin-Based DDS
FormulationDrug Delivery VehiclePlatformDiseaseLoaded DrugObserved EffectsRef.
GelatinHydrogel-based MNIn vitroKeloid scarringGallic acid
QAGN
Produced a controlled drug release of QAGN.
Downregulated the gene expression of fibroblasts.
[22]
Gelatin methacryloyl and β-cyclodextrinHydrogel-based MNIn vitro and in vivoMelanoma cancerCurcuminHigher therapeutic efficacy compared to non-transdermal patches.
Verified biocompatibility and degradability.
[25]
Gelatin and hydroxyapatiteNPsIn vitroLung cancerCurcuminSustained release of curcumin.
Higher increase in cellular internalization and toxicity towards A549 cells than free curcumin.
[26]
pH-sensitive gelatinMicrosphereIn vitroRespiratory diseaseCarvedilolRapid drug release under acidic state (pH = 1.2) and non-toxicity against Caco-2 cells[27]
DDS: drug delivery system; MN: microneedle; NPs: nanoparticles; QAGN: quercetin-loaded amphiphilic gelatin nanoparticles; Ref: References.
Table 2. Summary of studies on HA-based DDS.
Table 2. Summary of studies on HA-based DDS.
Hyaluronic Acid (HA)-Based DDS
FormulationDrug Delivery VehiclePlatformDiseaseLoaded DrugObserved EffectsRef.
HA-tetraphenyl ethyleneMicellesIn vitroCancerDOXGreat efficacy in unloading DOX through fast glutathione-triggered dissociation.[33]
HA-modifiedHalloysite nanotubeIn vitroCancerDOXEnhanced the therapeutic efficacy of DOX.
High antitumor efficacy in CD44-positive Hela cells.
[34]
HA–human serum albuminMicelle-like NPsIn vitro and in vivoBreast cancerDOXGreater cytotoxicity of MDA-MB231 cells.
CD44-mediated internalization of nanoparticles.
[35]
HAMNIn vivoAlopeciaMDXEnhancement of HDP cells.
Reduced hair loss in alopecia.
[36]
HAHydrogelIn vitro and in vivoColorectal cancer5-Fu5-FU is retained in a coordinated manner for a more extended period.
Toxicity assessment on rabbits also showed compatibility.
[37]
HAMulti-stimuli responsive hydrogelIn vitroCancerDOXAntitumor effect in breast cancer cells (BT-29)[38]
5-Fu: 5-fluorouracil; DDS: drug delivery system; DOX: doxorubicin; HA: hyaluronic acid; MN: microneedle; NPs: nanoparticles; Ref: references.
Table 3. Summary of studies on pectin-based DDS.
Table 3. Summary of studies on pectin-based DDS.
Pectin-Based DDS
FormulationDrug Delivery VehiclePlatformDiseaseLoaded DrugObserved EffectsRef.
Folic acid-modified pectinNPsIn vitro and in vivoType 1 diabetesInsulinPrevent the premature release of insulin.
High encapsulation efficiency.
Excellent stability.
Enhanced insulin delivery.
Improved hypoglycaemic effects on type 1 diabetes rats.
[39]
Amphipathically modified pectinSpherical nano-structuresIn vitroSkin-related diseaseFusidic acidFusidic acid was released in a more controlled manner.
HaCaT cells showed a non-cytotoxicity profile.
Two-fold greater penetration rate.
[41]
DDS: drug delivery system; NPs: nanoparticles; Ref: references.
Table 4. Summary of studies on starch-based DDSs.
Table 4. Summary of studies on starch-based DDSs.
Starch-Based DDS
FormulationDrug Delivery VehiclePlatformDiseaseLoaded DrugObserved EffectsRef.
Hydroxyethyl starch NPsIn vitro and in vivoUlcerative colitisCurcumin and DEXDrugs released in an α-amylase-responsive manner.
Effective internalization and cytocompatibility with macrophages.
Greater in efficacy compared to free DEX.
[45]
StarchNanofiberIn vitro and in vivoCancerCarvacrolThe system is resisting in vitro digestion.
50% reduction in cancer cells of rat C6 glioma cells.
[46]
Carboxymethyl starch -CMS@LDH(MgAl)@DOX,5-FuMicrospheresIn vitroColon cancer5-Fu and DOXSustained drug release pattern and controlled release profile of DOX and 5-Fu.[44]
5-Fu: 5-fluorouracil; DDS: drug delivery system; DEX: dexamethasone; DOX: Doxorubicin; NPs: nanoparticles; Ref: references.
Table 5. Summary of studies on XG-based DDSs.
Table 5. Summary of studies on XG-based DDSs.
Xanthan Gum (XG)-Based DDSs
FormulationDrug Delivery VehiclePlatformDiseaseLoaded DrugObserved EffectsRef.
Carboxyethyl XG-carboxymethyl XGHydrogel particleIn vitro and in vivoType 2 diabetesRepaglinideThe system released 97% drug in 4 h.
Prolonged drug release for 8 h.
Reduction in blood glucose levels in diabetic rats.
[51]
XGMDFsIn vitroType 2 diabetesGlibenclamideInstant release of drug.
Drug rapid dissolution.Optimum mechanical strength.
[52]
XGMDFsIn vitroHypertensionAmlodipineComplete drug release within 10 min.
[53]
XGGel-AuNPsIn vitroP. vulgaris infectionHesperidinGel showed antimicrobial activity against P. vulgaris.[54]
AuNPs: gold nanoparticles; MDFs: mouth-dissolving films; Ref: references.
Table 6. Summary of studies on dextran-based DDSs.
Table 6. Summary of studies on dextran-based DDSs.
Dextran-Based DDSs
FormulationDrug Delivery VehiclePlatformDiseaseLoaded DrugObserved EffectRef.
Dextran-stabilized perfluorohexaneUltrasound-responsive nanodropletsIn vitroCancerDOXParticle size and encapsulation efficiency.
Biphasic drug release system of DOX.
[62]
Vinyl-functionalized dextran, vinyl-modified graphene oxide-LaponiteNIR light-responsive hydrogelEx vivoMicrobial infectionCiproflo-xacinDrug dispersion in NIR-controllable.
Antibacterial effect.
Good compatibility with blood.
[64]
Modified dextran (dextran-sulfate-PVGLIG)NanomicellesIn vitro and in vivoRheumatoid arthritisCelHigh entrapment of drug in nanomicelles.
Effectively delivered the drug to the inflammatory joint.
Greater anti-RA effects.
Lower systemic toxicity in comparison to free Cel.
[65]
Dextran-graft-poly(2-(diisopropylamino) ethyl methacrylate-co-2-(2′,3′,5′-triiodobenzoyl) ethyl methacrylate)pH-sensitive micelleIn vitro and in vivoBreast cancerDOXOptimally release DOX into MCF-7 cells.
Excellent anticancer efficacy.
Effectively reduce the growth of the tumor.
[66]
AuNPs: gold nanoparticles; Cel: celastrol; DOX: doxorubicin; Ref: references.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nordin, A.H.; Ahmad, Z.; Husna, S.M.N.; Ilyas, R.A.; Azemi, A.K.; Ismail, N.; Nordin, M.L.; Ngadi, N.; Siti, N.H.; Nabgan, W.; et al. The State of the Art of Natural Polymer Functionalized Fe3O4 Magnetic Nanoparticle Composites for Drug Delivery Applications: A Review. Gels 2023, 9, 121. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9020121

AMA Style

Nordin AH, Ahmad Z, Husna SMN, Ilyas RA, Azemi AK, Ismail N, Nordin ML, Ngadi N, Siti NH, Nabgan W, et al. The State of the Art of Natural Polymer Functionalized Fe3O4 Magnetic Nanoparticle Composites for Drug Delivery Applications: A Review. Gels. 2023; 9(2):121. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9020121

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nordin, Abu Hassan, Zuliahani Ahmad, Siti Muhamad Nur Husna, Rushdan Ahmad Ilyas, Ahmad Khusairi Azemi, Noraznawati Ismail, Muhammad Luqman Nordin, Norzita Ngadi, Nordin Hawa Siti, Walid Nabgan, and et al. 2023. "The State of the Art of Natural Polymer Functionalized Fe3O4 Magnetic Nanoparticle Composites for Drug Delivery Applications: A Review" Gels 9, no. 2: 121. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9020121

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop