Next Article in Journal
Functional Characterization of the M36 Metalloprotease FgFly1 in Fusarium graminearum
Next Article in Special Issue
Identification of Three Epichloë Endophytes from Hordeum bogdanii Wilensky in China
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Physiological and Transcriptome Analysis Provide Insights into the Response of Cenococcum geophilum, an Ectomycorrhizal Fungus to Cadmium Stress
Previous Article in Special Issue
Telomere-to-Telomere Genome Sequences across a Single Genus Reveal Highly Variable Chromosome Rearrangement Rates but Absolute Stasis of Chromosome Number
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cuticular Wax Modification by Epichloë Endophyte in Achnatherum inebrians under Different Soil Moisture Availability

1
State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-Ecosystems, Key Laboratory of Grassland Livestock Industry Innovation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730020, China
2
Huaiyin Institute of Agricultural Sciences of Xuhuai Region in Jiangsu, Huai’an 223001, China
3
Institute of Horticulture, Ningxia Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Yinchuan 750002, China
4
Grasslands Research Centre, Private Bag 11-008, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2022, 8(7), 725; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8070725
Submission received: 5 May 2022 / Revised: 6 July 2022 / Accepted: 9 July 2022 / Published: 12 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fungal Endophytes of Grasses)

Abstract

:
The cuticular wax serves as the outermost hydrophobic barrier of plants against nonstomatal water loss and various environmental stresses. An objective of this study was to investigate the contribution of the mutualistic fungal endophyte Epichloë gansuensis to leaf cuticular wax of Achnatherum inebrians under different soil moisture availability. Through a pot experiment and gas chromatography−mass spectrometry (GC−MS) analysis, our results indicated that the hydrocarbons were the dominant components of leaf cuticular wax, and the proportion of alcohols, aldehydes, amines, and ethers varied with the presence or absence of E. gansuensis and different soil moisture availability. Amines and ethers are unique in endophyte-free (EF) A. inebrians plants and endophyte-infected (EI) A. inebrians plants, respectively. By transcriptome analysis, we found a total of 13 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) related to cuticular biosynthesis, including FabG, desB, SSI2, fadD, BiP, KCS, KAR, FAR, and ABCB1. A model is proposed which provides insights for understanding cuticular wax biosynthesis in the association of A. inebrians plants with E. gansuensis. These results may help guide the functional analyses of candidate genes important for improving the protective layer of cuticular wax of endophyte-symbiotic plants.

1. Introduction

Plants, unlike animals, inevitably withstand various biotic and abiotic stresses at the sites of growth, such as diseases, pests, drought, salinity, extreme temperatures, and heavy metals. As a major factor affecting plant growth and production, drought alone causes more annual losses in crop yields than all pathogens combined [1]. Droughts of the future are likely to be more frequent, severe, and longer-lasting than in recent decades [2]. To increase tolerance in harsh situations, plants create beneficial symbioses with a range of organisms, including mycorrhizal fungi, nitrogen-fixing bacteria, and endophytic fungi [3,4,5].
Endophytic fungi of the genus Epichloë have been found to form mutualistic associations with many cool season grasses which can enhance survival of host plants through protection against abiotic and biotic stresses [6,7,8]. Nearly 100% of A. inebrians plants, a perennial bunchgrass in the arid and semi-arid grasslands of northwest China, are symbiotic with either E. gansuensis [9] or E. inebrians [10]. According to the previous studies, the association of A. inebrians plants with E. gansuensis can improve the tolerance to diseases [11], pests [12], low temperature [13], heavy metals [14], and drought [15].
Cuticular wax deposition and composition is closely related to drought resistance and yield in plants, since cuticular wax serves as the outermost hydrophobic barrier against nonstomatal water loss and various environmental stresses [16]. Cuticular waxes, complex mixtures, predominantly contain very-long-chain fatty acids (VLCFAs), hydrocarbons, alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, esters, triterpenes, sterols, and flavonoids [17]. The biosynthesis of cuticular wax is accomplished in two steps: C16 and C18 fatty acids are extended to the VLCFAs by fatty acid elongase complexes through an iterative cycle of four reactions: two-carbon elongation of fatty acyl-Coenzyme A (CoA) by 3-ketoacyl-CoA synthase (KCS), reduction of 3-ketoacyl-CoA by 3-ketoacyl-CoA reductase (KCR), dehydration of 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA by 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydratase (HCD), and reduction of trans 2,3-enoyl-CoA by trans 2,3-enoyl-CoA reductase (ECR), and then each VLCFA is converted into wax components by decarbonylation and acyl reduction pathways in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The decarbonylation process mediates the formation of aldehydes, secondary alcohols, alkanes, and ketones, whereas the acyl reduction pathway is responsible for the formation of primary alcohols and wax esters [18]. Finally, various wax compounds are transported from the ER to the plasma membrane (PM), moved through the PM, and translocated across the cell wall to the cuticle by lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-binding cassette (ABC) transporters [19]. The composition and proportion of cuticular wax varies greatly among plant species, including the Poaceae grasses [17]. For example, primary alcohols are the most abundant components in cuticle wax of the leaves of wheat (Triticum aestivum) [20], maize (Zea mays) [21], barley (Hordeum vulgare) [22], Aegilops tauschiic [23], Brachypodium distachyum [24], and Poa pratensis [25], whereas in rice (Oryza sativa) leaves, wax mixtures are dominated by fatty acids [26]. Furthermore, cuticular wax deposition enhances drought resistance among many plant species, including tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) [27], Sorghum bicolor [28], rice [29], barley [30], and maize [31]. Although regulatory mechanisms of cuticular wax biosynthesis are relatively less well-understood in grasses compared to Arabidopsis thaliana, several transcription factors involved in cuticular wax biosynthesis have been characterized. For instance, in maize leaves, there are at least 18 Glossy genes that can affect the synthesis and composition of cuticular wax [32]. The OsWR1, OSWSL1, and DWA1 can activate cuticular wax biosynthesis to improve drought tolerance in rice [29,33,34]. However, studies on how endophytes influence the deposition, composition, and synthesis of cuticular wax under drought stress have not been reported. Our previous study suggested that the presence of an Epichloë endophyte decreased the fatty acid content of leaf epidermal wax of A. inebrians plants under different developmental stages at 1, 2, and 3 months [35].
In this study, we hypothesize that the association of A. inebrians plants with the endophyte (E. gansuensis) may result in changes in the composition of the cuticular wax under different soil moisture levels through influencing the expression of genes associated with key biosynthesis pathways. In order to test this hypothesis, we established endophyte-infected (EI) and endophyte-free (EF) A. inebrians plants in the greenhouse, and then set a challenge of three soil moisture availabilities, including drought stress. In addition, we measured the leaf cuticular wax composition and proportion by gas chromatography−mass spectrometry (GC−MS), as well as the expression levels of genes associated with the cuticular wax biosynthesis pathway by transcriptome analysis. In summary, an important foundation will be provided for future molecular studies and the regulatory mechanisms of Epichloë endophyte and drought stress on cuticular wax in A. inebrians plants based on these data.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Experimental Treatments

Seeds were collected from a single EI and an EF A. inebrians plant grown in the experimental field of the College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Yuzhong Campus of Lanzhou University (104°39′ E, 35°89′ N, Altitude 1653 m) in 2013. Seeds were stained with aniline blue and examined under light microscope at 40×power to look for fungal hyphae characteristic of Epichloë species to ensure that the infection rates of EI and EF plant seeds were 100% and 0%. Seed samples were maintained at 4°C and used for further study. A two-month pot experiment was carried out in a constant-temperature greenhouse (temperature: 26 ± 2 °C, moisture: 42 ± 2%) of the College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Yuzhong Campus of Lanzhou University. At first, healthy-looking and well-filled seeds were sown in 120 pots (60 pots of EI plants and 60 pots of EF plants), with 3 seeds in each pot (diameter: 24 cm; height: 15 cm), filled with vermiculite (200 g) that had been sterilized in an oven at 180 °C for 2 h. These pots were watered appropriately and assigned at random to different positions regularly every day. After the second fully unfolded leaf appeared, Hoagland’s solution was applied to the pots every 7 days.
Twenty-five days after pot establishment, watering was ceased to reduce the soil moisture content of each pot to 15% relative saturated moisture content (RSMC), a ratio of actual soil moisture content to potential maximum soil water saturation. Five days after ceasing watering, that is, 30 days after planting, the 96 pots (48 with EI and 48 with EF) were thinned to a single plant. Three different soil moisture treatments were set up: 15% (drought, D), 30% (normal, N), and 60% (well-watered, W), with 16 pots of both EI and EF plants of each soil moisture content. During the trial, at 6 o’clock every evening, each pot was weighed and watered to maintain soil moisture content at 15%, 30%, or 60% RSMC, respectively. One month after the establishment of the soil moisture treatments, leaf samples from six random pots of each treatment were separately harvested, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and maintained in a freezer at −80 °C for subsequent extraction of cuticular wax and transcriptome analysis.

2.2. Extraction of Cuticular Wax

Three replicate entire second leaf blades of each treatment were dipped in 10 mL of chloroform (Tianjin Guangfu Fine Chemical Research Institute, Tianjin, China) for 45 s to extract the total wax. As an internal standard, 20 μL n-tetracosane (1 μg μL−1, Aladdin, Shanghai, China) was added. The solution was concentrated to 1 mL under nitrogen. Then, 20 μL of N, O-Bis(trimethylsilyl)-trifluoroacetamide (GC Derivatization Reagent, ≥98.0%, Aladdin, Shanghai, China), and 20 μL pyridine (Standard for GC, >99.9%, Aladdin, Shanghai, China) were added, and the samples were maintained at 70 °C in a water bath for 1 h for derivatization. The solution was transferred to GC sample vials (1.5 mL) through organic filtration (0.45 μm) and blown dry under nitrogen. Finally, the samples were redissolved with 0.5 mL of chloroform for GC−MS analysis.

2.3. Chemical Analysis

Chemical analysis was performed by GC−MS (GCMS-QP2020, Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan), coupled with a DB−1 MS capillary column (30 m length, 0.25 μm inner diameter, 0.25 μm film thickness, Agilent Technologies Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA). Helium was used as a carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.2 mL min−1. The following other parameters were employed: inlet temperature, 280 °C; MS quadrupole temperature, 150 °C; transfer line temperature, 250 °C; ion source temperature, 230 °C; m z−1 range, 50−850. GC was carried out at the following temperature settings: 2 min at 50 °C, 40 °C min−1 to 200 °C, 2 min at 200 °C, 3 °C min−1 to 320 °C, and 30 min at 320 °C. Individual wax components were identified via the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 2017 library or comparing their mass spectra with the literature data. Single wax compounds were quantified against the internal standard by integrating the peak areas.

2.4. RNA Preparation and Transcriptome Sequencing

Total RNA was obtained from the six treatments, each with three biological replicates. The concentration and integrity of RNA was assessed using a Qubit® RNA Assay Kit in Qubit®2.0 Flurometer (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and an RNA Nano 6000 Assay Kit of the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
Transcriptome sequencing was carried out by the Biomarker Technologies Company (Beijing, China). Libraries were generated using NEBNext®UltraTM RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina® (NEB, San Diego, CA, USA), and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform. The library fragments were purified with an AMPure XP system (Beckman Coulter, Beverly, CA, USA).

2.5. Differentially Expressed Gene (DEG) Analysis

Fragments per kilobase per million mapped fragments (FPKM) values were calculated to evaluate the expression level of each gene. Differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis was performed using DEseq2_EBseq, with a false discovery rate (FDR) ≤ 0.05 and fold change (FC) ≥ 2. Gene function was annotated based on the following databases: NR (NCBI non-redundant protein sequences); Pfam (protein family); KOG/COG/eggNOG (clusters of orthologous groups of proteins); Swiss-Prot (a manually annotated and reviewed protein sequence database); KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes); and GO (gene ontology). GO enrichment analysis of the DEGs was performed by the GOseq R package based on a Kolmogorov–Smirnov test [36], and the statistical enrichment of DEGs in the KEGG pathway was determined by KOBAS software [37]. All raw sequences utilized in this study were deposited in Sequence Read Achieve (SRA) of the NCBI database under the accession number PRJNA748183.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Differences in the proportion of cuticular wax under different endophyte status and soil moisture levels were tested using two-way analysis of variance (two-way ANOVA) by SPSS 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Significant differences in the proportion of cuticular wax between EI and EF A. inebrians plants with the corresponding soil moisture content were examined by an independent-sample t-test. Fisher’s least significant differences (LSD) test was used to determine whether differences between means were statistically significant. In all tests, p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data are the mean + standard error.

3. Results

3.1. Composition and Proportion of Leaf Cuticular Wax

The total leaf cuticular wax of A. inebrians plants under six treatments (DEI, DEF, NEI, NEF, WEI, and WEF) was collected individually via chloroform extraction. The composition of each wax extraction preparation was analyzed by GC–MS. A total of 59 different wax compounds were detected, which contained 44, 20, 31, 23, 34, and 39 compounds, respectively (Supplementary Tables S1–S6). In addition, the main wax components also varied among the six treatments, including alcohols (from minimum to maximum of 0–4.69%), aldehydes (from minimum to maximum of 0–1.61%), amines (from minimum to maximum of 0–2.28%), esters (from minimum to maximum of 8.88–35.47%), ethers (from minimum to maximum of 0–0.29%), fatty acids (from minimum to maximum of 13.12–19.89%), hydrocarbons (from minimum to maximum of 44.58–69.36%), and phenols (from minimum to maximum of 0–1.80%; Figure 1). Two-way ANOVA analysis showed that soil moisture content, the presence or absence of the Epichloë endophyte, and the interaction between the two factors had significant (p < 0.05) effects on the proportion of alcohols and ethers (Table 1). The proportion of alcohols of EI A. inebrians was significantly (p < 0.05) higher than that of EF A. inebrians under 15% soil moisture content. Under 30% soil moisture content, the status of Epichloë endophyte had no significant (p > 0.05) effects on the proportion of alcohols. Under 60% soil moisture content, the proportion of alcohols of EI A. inebrians was significantly (p < 0.05) lower than that of EF A. inebrians. With EI plants, the alcohol proportion at 15% soil moisture content was significantly (p < 0.05) higher than that at 60% soil moisture content. With EF plants, the alcohol proportion at 15% soil moisture content was significantly (p < 0.05) lower than that at 60% soil moisture content. At 15% and 30% soil moisture content, the ethers were found only in EI A. inebrians, and the proportion of ethers of EI A. inebrians was significantly (p < 0.05) higher than that of EF plants (Figure 1). Soil moisture content had significant effects on the proportion of aldehydes (Table 1). The aldehydes proportion of A. inebrians wax at 60% soil moisture content was significantly (p < 0.05) higher than that at 15% and 30% soil moisture content. However, soil moisture content, the presence or absence of the Epichloë endophyte, and the interaction between the two factors had no significant (p < 0.05) effects on the proportion of amines, esters, fatty acids, hydrocarbons, and phenols. Amines were found only in EF plants at 15% and 30% soil moisture content.

3.2. Carbon Chain Length of Wax Components

The chain length distributions revealed a shift in chain length for several substance classes under the six treatments, including alcohols (C11–C31), aldehydes (C11), amines (C8), esters (C19–C27), ethers (C11 and C21), fatty acids (C19 and C21), hydrocarbons (C8–C54), and phenols (C42; Figure 2). C31 was the dominant alcohol. For esters, C25 and C27 were most abundant. C20 and C54 accounted for the most prominent hydrocarbon components. Furthermore, C11, C8, and C42 were the only aldehyde, amine, and phenol detected, respectively. C11 and C21 were the only two ethers detected in the six treatments, whereas C19 and C21 were the only two fatty acids (Supplementary Figure S1).

3.3. Differentially Expressed Gene (DEG) Analysis

Upon comparison with the 30% soil moisture content treatment and the EF treatment at each soil moisture content, the unigenes with gene expression fold changes greater than or equal to 2 and with an FDR value below 0.05 were defined as DEGs. Based on these strict criteria, there were five (two upregulated and three downregulated) DEGs between DEF versus DEI, four (three upregulated and one downregulated) DEGs between NEF versus NEI, 11 (four upregulated and seven downregulated) DEGs between WEF versus WEI, one (one upregulated and zero downregulated) DEG between NEF versus DEF, three (three upregulated and zero downregulated) DEGs between NEF versus WEF, zero DEGs between NEI versus DEI, and three (one upregulated and two downregulated) DEGs between NEI versus WEI. At each treatment, we detected both unique and overlapping sets of DEGs (panels a–d of Figure 2).

3.4. KEGG Pathway Enrichment Analysis of the DEGs

To characterize the complex biological behavior of the transcriptome, 13 DEGs were subjected to a KEGG pathway enrichment analysis (Figure 2e). The “Biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids (ko01040)”, “Fatty acid metabolism (ko01212)”, “Fatty acid biosynthesis (ko00061)”, and “Fatty acid elongation (ko00062)” categories were significantly enriched.

3.5. GO Functional-Enrichment Analysis of the DEGs

To investigate the functions of the detected 13 DEGs, GO annotation was performed. A total of 19 GO categories were assigned to the 13 DEGs (Figure 2f). GO term enrichment analysis categorized the annotated sequences into three main categories: biological process, cellular component, and molecular function. In the biological process category, “metabolic process” was the most dominant group, followed by “single-organism process” and “cellular process”. Regarding the cellular component category, “cell” and “cell part” were the dominant categories, followed by “organelle” and “membrane”. In the molecular function category, “catalytic activity” was the most dominant group, followed by “binding” and “transporter activity”.

3.6. Biosynthesis Pathway of Cuticular Wax

A model was proposed that consists of four parts: fatty acid biosynthesis, fatty acid elongation, wax biosynthesis, and transporters (Figure 3). FAR (c44116.graph_c0), KCS (c40460.graph_c0), and SSI2 (c53997.graph_c0) expression levels were significantly (p < 0.05) downregulated, whereas BiP (c48041.graph_c2) and fadD (c47791.graph_c0) expression levels were significantly (p < 0.05) upregulated at 15% soil moisture content in EI A. inebrians compared with those in EF A. inebrians. SSI2 (c53997.graph_c0) expression level was significantly (p < 0.05) downregulated, whereas KCR (c43252.graph_c0), BiP (c48041.graph_c2), and fadD (c47791.graph_c0) expression levels were significantly (p < 0.05) upregulated at 30% soil moisture content in EI A. inebrians compared with those in EF A. inebrians. FAR (c44116.graph_c0), KCS (c40460.graph_c0, c53961.graph_c0), SSI2 (c56761.graph_c1, c62503.graph_c0, c53997.graph_c0), and ABCB1 (c58346.graph_c0) were significantly (p < 0.05) downregulated at 60% soil moisture content in EI A. inebrians compared with those in EF A. inebrians. KCS (c48314.graph_c0), desB (c50293.graph_c0), BiP (c48041.graph_c2), and fadD (c47791.graph_c0) were significantly (p < 0.05) upregulated at 60% soil moisture content in EI A. inebrians compared with those in EF A. inebrians. KCS (c40460.graph_c0) expression level was significantly (p < 0.05) upregulated in EF A. inebrians at 15% soil moisture content compared with those at 30% soil moisture content. KCS (c40460.graph_c0, c53961.graph_c0) and KCR (c43252.graph_c0) expression levels were significantly (p < 0.05) upregulated in EF A. inebrians at 60% soil moisture content compared with those at 30% soil moisture content. KCS (c53961.graph_c0) and ABCB1 (c58346.graph_c0) expression levels were significantly (p < 0.05) downregulated, whereas FabG (c59354.graph_c0) expression level was significantly (p < 0.05) upregulated in EI A. inebrians at 60% soil moisture content compared with those at 30% soil moisture content.

4. Discussion

In the present study, we predicted that in response to different soil moisture availability, the composition of leaf cuticular wax and the expression of genes related with the cuticular wax biosynthesis pathway would change in A. inebrians plants host to E. gansuensis. Our results showed that the composition of leaf cuticular wax, especially alcohols, aldehydes, amines, and ethers, did change with different soil moisture availability, and the way these changes occurred differed with the presence or absence of E. gansuensis. The proportion of alcohols decreased with the increase of soil moisture in EI plants, but increased with the increase of soil moisture in EF plants. The aldehydes proportion of A. inebrians wax at 60% soil moisture content was significantly (p < 0.05) higher than that at 15% and 30% soil moisture content. Amines and ethers were only detected in the leaf cuticular wax of EF A. inebrians plants and EI A. inebrians plants, respectively. In agreement with our hypothesis, the Epichloë endophyte and soil moisture content changed the expression levels of 13 genes connected to cuticular wax biosynthesis and transport, such as FabG, desB, SSI2, fadD, BiP, KCS, KAR, FAR, and ABCB1.
Cuticular wax consistently serves a critical role in restricting nonstomatal water loss to protect the plant against environmental stresses such as drought [38]. In the present study, hydrocarbons were the major components of the cuticular wax in A. inebrians plants under six treatments. This was not the case in most studies. In leaves of barley and maize, the major cuticular wax components were shown to be primary alcohols, whereas alkanes comprise less than 15% of the total wax amount [39]. However, some studies also support this result. Water deficiency resulted in a four-fold rise in total wax on Ar. thaliana leaves, which was attributed to an overall increase of alkanes [40]. Our previous study showed that the leaf epidermal wax of EI and EF A. inebrians plants under different developmental stages is composed of hydrocarbons, esters, alcohols, fatty acids, phenols, and ketones, and the main group is hydrocarbon [35]. Our present study followed on from that previous study by including the interaction between drought and the Epichloë endophyte. Unlike the findings from Ar. thaliana leaves exposed to water deficiency [41,42], we did not find any DEGs associated to the hydrocarbon biosynthesis pathway. Epichloë endophyte greatly increased the proportion of alcohols under drought conditions, which may be closely connected to the improvement in drought resistance of EI A. inebrians plants.
A large number of genes encoding enzymes involved in cuticular wax biosynthesis and transporters have been identified in Ar. thaliana [38]. In grasses, especially maize and rice, significant progress has also been made in this area in recent years [26,31]. As nearly all A. inebrians plants growing in the arid, semi-arid grasslands in northwest China are host to an Epichloë endophyte, it is obvious that the presence of the endophyte does provide a competitive advantage under drought stress. In the present study, we used transcriptome analysis to explore the cuticular wax biosynthesis mechanism of the association of A. inebrians plants with E. gansuensis in order to clarify a potential biosynthesis model. In plastids, free fatty acids can be esterified to Coenzyme A (CoA) by long-chain-acyl-CoA synthetases (LACS), before translocation to the ER [38]. In our study, the expression level of the fadD gene encoding LACS was upregulated, which likely indicates that the Epichloë endophyte promotes fatty acid metabolism. As the first step of the acyl chain extension, the condensation of malonyl-CoA with an acyl-CoA primer is carried out by a condensing enzyme (β-ketoacyl-CoA synthase, KCS), which defines the substrate specificity of each elongation cycle [19]. Three KCS genes were differentially expressed in the present study. A previous study showed that OSWSL1, a rice homolog of Arabidopsis KCS, enhanced sensitivity to drought and wax-deficiency [33]. The proteins of fatty acyl-CoA reductase (FAR) that generate primary alcohols are ubiquitous in plants [18]. Our results showed that Epichloë endophyte downregulated the FAR gene expression. Once wax components reach the PM, transport across the PM into the extracellular matrix is facilitated by ABC transporters [19]. In Ar. thaliana, the proteins of WBC/ABCG subfamily are required for wax export to the cuticle [43]. However, we found the ABCB1 gene of ABCB subfamily was downregulated under the well-watered condition in this study. The ABCB subfamily of genes may have a role in the drought stress response of A. inebrians plants with E. gansuensis, and be responsible for wax transport, similar to WBC/ABCG, but this remains to be further verified. Moreover, as one of the major ER chaperone proteins, binding protein (BiP) overexpression may lead to the increased tolerance to various environmental stresses of the plants by causing an ER stress response [44,45]. In the present study, Epichloë endophyte promoted the expression of the BiP gene, which may lead to a greater tolerance to stress of EI A. inebrians plants compared with EF A. inebrians plants.
In conclusion, the present study highlights that the presence of Epichloë endophytes can contribute significantly to the composition of cuticular wax of endophyte-symbiotic plants under different soil moisture availability. The enhanced resistance to drought of A. inebrians plants host to an Epichloë endophyte may, in part, be explained by changes in the expression levels of genes associated with the cuticular wax biosynthesis pathway. Therefore, further studies are required to verify the gene function of genes related to cuticular wax of endophyte-symbiotic plants.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof8070725/s1, Figure S1: The carbon chain length distribution detected in the cuticular wax of Achnatherum inebrians under the status of Epichloë gansuensis endophyte and different soil moisture content: alcohols (a), aldehydes (b), amines (c), esters (d), ethers (e), fatty acids (f), hydrocarbons (g) and phenols (h). Values are mean, with standard error bars (n = 3, D: drought, N: normal, W: well-watered, EI: endophyte-infected and EF: endophyte-free); Table S1: Qualitative GC-MS analysis of the leaf extract of endophyte-infected Achnatherum inebrians under 15% soil moisture content, elucidation of empirical formulas and putative identification (where possible) of the compounds; Table S2: Qualitative GC-MS analysis of the leaf extract of endophyte-free Achnatherum inebrians under 15% soil moisture content, elucidation of empirical formulas and putative identification (where possible) of the compounds; Table S3: Qualitative GC-MS analysis of the leaf extract of endophyte-infected Achnatherum inebrians under 30% soil moisture content, elucidation of empirical formulas and putative identification (where possible) of the compounds; Table S4: Qualitative GC-MS analysis of the leaf extract of endophyte-free Achnatherum inebrians under 30% soil moisture content, elucidation of empirical formulas and putative identification (where possible) of the compounds; Table S5: Qualitative GC-MS analysis of the leaf extract of endophyte-infected Achnatherum inebrians under 60% soil moisture content, elucidation of empirical formulas and putative identification (where possible) of the compounds; Table S6: Qualitative GC-MS analysis of the leaf extract of endophyte-free Achnatherum inebrians under 60% soil moisture content, elucidation of empirical formulas and putative identification (where possible) of the compounds; Table S7: Selected genes associated with cuticular wax biosynthesis in Achnatherum inebrians identified in the RNA-seq analysis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.Z. and Z.N.; Methodology, M.K. and M.T.; Investigation, Y.J., M.K. and Z.Z.; Writing—Original Draft, Z.Z.; Writing—Review and Editing, M.J.C. and Z.Z.; Funding Acquisition, X.Z. and M.T.; Resources, Y.J., M.K. and Z.Z.; Supervision, M.T., X.Z. and Z.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (32061123004 and 31772665), and National Basic Research Program of China (2014CB138702), and the Leading Fund Project of Science and Technology Innovation of Ningxia Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences (NKYG-22-03).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and within its supplementary materials published online. The RNA-seq used in this study have been deposited in the Sequence Read Achieve (SRA) of the NCBI database under the accession number PRJNA748183.

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

  1. Gupta, A.; Rico-Medina, A.; Caño-Delgado, A.I. The physiology of plant responses to drought. Science 2020, 368, 266–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ault, T.R. On the essentials of drought in a changing climate. Science 2020, 368, 256–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bastías, D.A.; Martinez-Ghersa, M.A.; Ballaré, C.L.; Gundel, P.E. Epichloë Fungal Endophytes and Plant Defenses: Not Just Alkaloids. Trends Plant Sci. 2017, 22, 939–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Brundrett, M.C. Coevolution of roots and mycorrhizas of land plants. New Phytol. 2002, 154, 275–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lowman, S.; Dura, S.; Mei, C.S.; Nowak, J. Strategies for enhancement of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) performance under limited nitrogen supply based on utilization of N-fixing bacterial endophytes. Plant Soil 2016, 405, 47–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Johnson, L.J.; de Bonth, A.C.M.; Briggs, L.R.; Caradus, J.R.; Finch, S.C.; Fleetwood, D.J.; Fletcher, L.R.; Hume, D.E.; Johnson, R.D.; Popay, A.J.; et al. The exploitation of epichloae endophytes for agricultural benefit. Fungal Divers. 2013, 60, 171–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kuldau, G.; Bacon, C. Clavicipitaceous endophytes: Their ability to enhance resistance of grasses to multiple stresses. Biol. Control 2008, 46, 57–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Leuchtmann, A.; Bacon, C.W.; Schardl, C.L.; White, J.F.; Tadych, M. Nomenclatural realignment of Neotyphodium species with genus Epichloë. Mycologia 2014, 106, 202–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, C.J.; Nan, Z.B.; Paul, V.H.; Dapprich, P.D.; Liu, Y. A new Neotyphodium species symbiotic with drunken horse grass (Achnatherum inebrians) in China. Mycotaxon 2004, 90, 141–147. [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen, L.; Li, X.Z.; Li, C.J.; Swoboda, G.A.; Young, C.A.; Sugawara, K.; Leuchtmann, A.; Schardl, C.L. Two distinct Epichloë species symbiotic with Achnatherum inebrians, drunken horse grass. Mycologia 2015, 107, 863–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Xia, C.; Zhang, X.X.; Christensen, M.J.; Nan, Z.B.; Li, C.J. Epichloë endophyte affects the ability of powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis) to colonise drunken horse grass (Achnatherum inebrians). Fungal Ecol. 2015, 16, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, X.X.; Li, C.J.; Nan, Z.B.; Matthew, C. Neotyphodium endophyte increases Achnatherum inebrians (drunken horse grass) resistance to herbivores and seed predators. Weed Res. 2012, 52, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, N.; He, R.L.; Chai, Q.; Li, C.J.; Nan, Z.B. Transcriptomic analyses giving insights into molecular regulation mechanisms involved in cold tolerance by Epichloë endophyte in seed germination of Achnatherum inebrians. Plant Growth Regul. 2016, 80, 367–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, X.X.; Fan, X.M.; Li, C.J.; Nan, Z.B. Effects of cadmium stress on seed germination, seedling growth and antioxidative enzymes in Achnatherum inebrians plants infected with a Neotyphodium endophyte. Plant Growth Regul. 2010, 60, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xia, C.; Christensen, M.J.; Zhang, X.X.; Nan, Z.B. Effect of Epichloë gansuensis endophyte and transgenerational effects on the water use efficiency, nutrient and biomass accumulation of Achnatherum inebrians under soil water deficit. Plant Soil 2018, 424, 555–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cameron, K.D.; Teece, M.A.; Smart, L.B. Increased accumulation of cuticular wax and expression of lipid transfer protein in response to periodic drying events in leaves of tree tobacco. Plant Physiol. 2006, 140, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Post-Beittenmiller, D. Biochemistry and molecular biology of wax production in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1996, 47, 405–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kunst, L.; Samuels, A.L. Biosynthesis and secretion of plant cuticular wax. Prog. Lipid Res. 2003, 42, 51–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kunst, L.; Samuels, L. Plant cuticles shine: Advances in wax biosynthesis and export. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2009, 12, 721–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Koch, K.; Barthlott, W.; Koch, S.; Hommes, A.; Wandelt, K.; Mamdouh, W.; De-Feyter, S.; Broekmann, P. Structural analysis of wheat wax (Triticum aestivum, c.v. ‘Naturastar’ L.): From the molecular level to three dimensional crystals. Planta 2006, 223, 258–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Javelle, M.; Vernoud, V.; Depège-Fargeix, N.; Arnould, C.; Oursel, D.; Domergue, F.; Sarda, X.; Rogowsky, P.M. Overexpression of the epidermis-specific homeodomain-leucine zipper IV transcription factor OUTER CELL LAYER1 in maize identifies target genes involved in lipid metabolism and cuticle biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 2010, 154, 273–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Avato, P.; Mikkelsen, J.D.; Wettstein-knowles, P.V. Synthesis of epicuticular primary alcohols and intracellular fatty acids by tissue slices from cer-j59 barley leaves. Carlsberg Res. Commun. 1982, 47, 377–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, Y.T.; Sun, Y.L.; Wang, M.L.; Wang, Y.; Shi, X.; Li, C.L.; Quan, L.; Wang, Z.H.; Chen, Y.F. Composition and ultrastructure variation of leaf culticular wax at different developing stages of Aegilops Tauschii. J. Triticeae Crops 2014, 34, 1516–1521. [Google Scholar]
  24. Li, T.T.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Sun, Y.L.; Wang, Y.T.; Wang, M.L.; Hu, S.W.; Wang, Y.; Shi, X.; Quan, L.; Wang, Z.H. Cuticular Wax Composition and Microscopic Structure of Different Organs of Brachypodium distachyon. J. Triticeae Crops 2014, 34, 969–975. [Google Scholar]
  25. Yao, L.H.; Ni, Y.; Guo, N.; He, Y.J.; Gao, J.H.; Guo, Y.J. Leaf cuticular waxes in Poa pratensis and their responses to altitudes. Acta Prataculturae Sin. 2018, 27, 97–105. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhang, D.; Yang, H.F.; Wang, X.C.; Qiu, Y.J.; Tian, L.H.; Qi, X.Q.; Qu, L.Q. Cytochrome P450 family member CYP96B5 hydroxylates alkanes to primary alcohols and is involved in rice leaf cuticular wax synthesis. New Phytol. 2020, 225, 2094–2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, Z.F.; Rao, L.Q.; Xiang, Z.X.; Hu, X.M.; Wang, X.J. Epidermis wax content and drought resistance among different tall fescue (Festuca Arundinacea schreb.) varieties. Acta Bot. Boreali-Occident. Sin. 2007, 27, 1417–1421. [Google Scholar]
  28. Saneoka, H.; Ogata, S. Relationship between water use efficiency and cuticular wax deposition in warm season forage crops grown under water deficit conditions. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 1987, 33, 439–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Wang, Y.H.; Wan, L.Y.; Zhang, L.X.; Zhang, Z.J.; Zhang, H.W.; Quan, R.D.; Zhou, S.R.; Huang, R.F. An ethylene response factor OsWR1 responsive to drought stress transcriptionally activates wax synthesis related genes and increases wax production in rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 2012, 78, 275–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhao, D.B.; Zhang, H.L.; Wang, X.; Qi, J.C.; Hui, H.S.; Lin, L.H.; Wang, F.; Zheng, X.G. Relationship between epicuticular wax components and its content and drought resistance in barley leaf. Xinjiang Agric. Sci. 2017, 54, 43–50. [Google Scholar]
  31. Li, L.; Du, Y.C.; He, C.; Dietrich, C.R.; Li, J.K.; Ma, X.L.; Wang, R.; Liu, Q.; Liu, S.Z.; Wang, G.Y.; et al. Maize glossy6 is involved in cuticular wax deposition and drought tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 3089–3099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Neuffer, M.G.; Coe, E.H.; Wessler, S.R. Mutants of maize. Q. Rev. Biol. 1998, 73, 207. [Google Scholar]
  33. Yu, D.; Ranathunge, K.; Huang, H.; Pei, Z.; Franke, R.; Schreiber, L.; He, C. Wax Crystal-Sparse Leaf1 encodes a beta-ketoacyl CoA synthase involved in biosynthesis of cuticular waxes on rice leaf. Planta 2008, 228, 675–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhu, X.Y.; Xiong, L.Z. Putative megaenzyme DWA1 plays essential roles in drought resistance by regulating stress-induced wax deposition in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 17790–17795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Kou, M.Z. The Responses of Achnatherum inebrians-Epichloë Endophyte Symbiont to Blumeria graminis. Master’s Thesis, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  36. Alexa, A.; Rahnenfuhrer, J. topGO: Enrichment Analysis for Gene Ontology; R Package Version 2.18.0; Cranio: Saarbrücken, Germany, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  37. Xie, C.; Mao, X.Z.; Huang, J.K.; Ding, Y.; Wu, J.M.; Dong, S.; Kong, L.; Gao, G.; Li, C.Y.; Wei, L.P. KOBAS 2.0: A web server for annotation and identification of enriched pathways and diseases. Nucleic Acids Res 2011, 39, 316–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Lewandowska, M.; Keyl, A.; Feussner, I. Wax biosynthesis in response to danger: Its regulation upon abiotic and biotic stress. New Phytol. 2020, 227, 698–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Lee, S.B.; Suh, M.C. Advances in the understanding of cuticular waxes in Arabidopsis thaliana and crop species. Plant Cell Rep. 2015, 34, 557–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kosma, D.K.; Bourdenx, B.; Bernard, A.; Parsons, E.P.; Lü, S.; Joubès, J.; Jenks, M.A. The impact of water deficiency on leaf cuticle lipids of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2009, 151, 1918–1929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Bernard, A.; Domergue, F.; Pascal, S.; Jetter, R.; Renne, C.; Faure, J.D.; Haslam, R.P.; Napier, J.A.; Lessire, R.; Joubes, J. Reconstitution of plant alkane biosynthesis in yeast demonstrates that Arabidopsis ECERIFERUM1 and ECERIFERUM3 are core components of a very-long-chain alkane synthesis complex. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 3106–3118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Pascal, S.; Bernard, A.; Deslous, P.; Gronnier, J.; Fournier-Goss, A.; Domergue, F.; Rowland, O.; Joubes, J. Arabidopsis CER1-LIKE1 functions in a cuticular very-long-chain alkane-forming complex. Plant Physiol. 2019, 179, 415–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Pighin, J.A.; Zheng, H.Q.; Balakshin, L.J.; Goodman, I.P.; Western, T.L.; Jetter, R.; Kunst, L.; Samuels, A.L. Plant cuticular lipid export requires an ABC transporter. Science 2004, 306, 702–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Valente, M.A.; Faria, J.A.; Soares-Ramos, J.R.; Reis, P.A.; Pinheiro, G.L.; Piovesan, N.D.; Morais, A.T.; Menezes, C.C.; Cano, M.A.; Fietto, L.G.; et al. The ER luminal binding protein (BiP) mediates an increase in drought tolerance in soybean and delays drought-induced leaf senescence in soybean and tobacco. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 533–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhu, J.T.; Hao, P.C.; Chen, G.X.; Han, C.X.; Li, X.H. Molecular cloning, phylogenetic analysis, and expression profiling of endoplasmic reticulum molecular chaperone BiP genes from bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The proportion of alcohols (a), aldehydes (b), amines (c), esters (d), ethers (e), fatty acids (f), hydrocarbons (g), and phenols (h) of leaf cuticular wax in Achnatherum inebrians under the status of Epichloë gansuensis endophyte and different soil moisture content (D: drought, N: normal, W: well-watered, EI: endophyte-infected and EF: endophyte-free). Values are means, with standard error bars (n = 3). Columns with non-matching letters indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05.
Figure 1. The proportion of alcohols (a), aldehydes (b), amines (c), esters (d), ethers (e), fatty acids (f), hydrocarbons (g), and phenols (h) of leaf cuticular wax in Achnatherum inebrians under the status of Epichloë gansuensis endophyte and different soil moisture content (D: drought, N: normal, W: well-watered, EI: endophyte-infected and EF: endophyte-free). Values are means, with standard error bars (n = 3). Columns with non-matching letters indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05.
Jof 08 00725 g001
Figure 2. Venn diagrams comparing differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in Achnatherum inebrians under the status of Epichloë gansuensis endophyte (a,b) and different moisture content (c,d). KEGG pathway enrichment (e) of DEGs associated with A. inebrians under different moisture content and the status of Epichloë endophyte. The q-value ranges from 0 to 1, and a q-value closer to 0 indicates greater enrichment. Go class (f) of DEGs associated with A. inebrians under different moisture content and the status of Epichloë endophyte (D: drought, N: normal, W: well-watered, EI: endophyte-infected, and EF: endophyte-free).
Figure 2. Venn diagrams comparing differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in Achnatherum inebrians under the status of Epichloë gansuensis endophyte (a,b) and different moisture content (c,d). KEGG pathway enrichment (e) of DEGs associated with A. inebrians under different moisture content and the status of Epichloë endophyte. The q-value ranges from 0 to 1, and a q-value closer to 0 indicates greater enrichment. Go class (f) of DEGs associated with A. inebrians under different moisture content and the status of Epichloë endophyte (D: drought, N: normal, W: well-watered, EI: endophyte-infected, and EF: endophyte-free).
Jof 08 00725 g002
Figure 3. Proposed model for cuticular wax biosynthesis. Color bars ranging from purple to blue represent downregulation and upregulation in transcript expression. Gene ID is shown. Sectors of an equally divided circle represent comparisons between DEF and DEI, NEF and NEI, WEF and WEI, NEF and DEF, NEF and WEF, NEI and DEI, and NEI and WEI, respectively (D: drought, N: normal, W: well-watered, EI: endophyte-infected, and EF: endophyte-free).
Figure 3. Proposed model for cuticular wax biosynthesis. Color bars ranging from purple to blue represent downregulation and upregulation in transcript expression. Gene ID is shown. Sectors of an equally divided circle represent comparisons between DEF and DEI, NEF and NEI, WEF and WEI, NEF and DEF, NEF and WEF, NEI and DEI, and NEI and WEI, respectively (D: drought, N: normal, W: well-watered, EI: endophyte-infected, and EF: endophyte-free).
Jof 08 00725 g003
Table 1. Two-way ANOVA analysis showing the effects of the status of Epichloë gansuensis endophyte (E) and different soil moisture content (W) on the wax compositions of the leaves of Achnatherum inebrians (df: degree of freedom, F: F-value, and P: p-value).
Table 1. Two-way ANOVA analysis showing the effects of the status of Epichloë gansuensis endophyte (E) and different soil moisture content (W) on the wax compositions of the leaves of Achnatherum inebrians (df: degree of freedom, F: F-value, and P: p-value).
AlcoholsAldehydesAminesEstersEthersFatty AcidsHydrocarbonsPhenols
TreatmentdfFPFPFPFPFPFPFPFP
E16.520.0252.1040.1732.6910.1270.2910.59917.1710.0010.2720.6120.1540.7010.8090.386
W28.4420.0059.3090.0040.6740.5283.0250.0864.3810.0370.010.993.7760.0531.8930.193
E × W229.87302.9610.090.6740.5282.1850.1554.3810.0372.310.1421.3790.2892.9980.088
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, Z.; Ju, Y.; Kou, M.; Tian, M.; Christensen, M.J.; Zhang, X.; Nan, Z. Cuticular Wax Modification by Epichloë Endophyte in Achnatherum inebrians under Different Soil Moisture Availability. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 725. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8070725

AMA Style

Zhao Z, Ju Y, Kou M, Tian M, Christensen MJ, Zhang X, Nan Z. Cuticular Wax Modification by Epichloë Endophyte in Achnatherum inebrians under Different Soil Moisture Availability. Journal of Fungi. 2022; 8(7):725. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8070725

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Zhenrui, Yawen Ju, Mingzhu Kou, Mei Tian, Michael John Christensen, Xingxu Zhang, and Zhibiao Nan. 2022. "Cuticular Wax Modification by Epichloë Endophyte in Achnatherum inebrians under Different Soil Moisture Availability" Journal of Fungi 8, no. 7: 725. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8070725

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop