Next Article in Journal
Comprehensive Analysis of Transcriptome and Metabolome Elucidates the Molecular Regulatory Mechanism of Salt Resistance in Roots of Achnatherum inebrians Mediated by Epichloë gansuensis
Next Article in Special Issue
Fungal Whole-Genome Sequencing for Species Identification: From Test Development to Clinical Utilization
Previous Article in Journal
FgLEU1 Is Involved in Leucine Biosynthesis, Sexual Reproduction, and Full Virulence in Fusarium graminearum
Previous Article in Special Issue
Identification of Fungi Involved in Onychomycosis in Patients of a Spanish Rural Area
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Whole Genome Sequencing-Based Approach to Track down Genomic Variants in Itraconazole-Resistant Species of Aspergillus from Iran

1
Department of Medical Mycology, Faculty of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari 4815733971, Iran
2
Invasive Fungi Research Center, Communicable Diseases Institute, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari 4815733971, Iran
3
Department of Immunology/Molecular and Cell Biology Research Center (MCBRC), Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari 48175-1665, Iran
4
Department of Medical Biotechnology, School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan 4513956111, Iran
5
Cancer Gene Therapy Research Center, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan 4513956111, Iran
6
Fuller Laboratories, 1312 East Valencia Drive, Fullerton, CA 92831, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2022, 8(10), 1091; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8101091
Submission received: 9 June 2022 / Revised: 5 October 2022 / Accepted: 13 October 2022 / Published: 17 October 2022

Abstract

:
The antifungal resistance in non-fumigatus Aspergillus spp., as well as Aspergillus fumigatus, poses a major therapeutic challenge which affects the entire healthcare community. Mutation occurrence of cyp51 gene paralogs is the major cause of azole resistance in Aspergillus spp. To obtain a full map of genomic changes, an accurate scan of the entire length of the Aspergillus genome is necessary. In this study, using whole genome sequencing (WGS) technique, we evaluated the mutation in cyp51A, cyp51B, Cdr1B, AtrR, Hmg1, HapE and FfmA genes in different clinical isolates of Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus tubingensis, Aspergillus welwitschiae and Aspergillus terreus which responded to minimum inhibitory concentrations of itraconazole above 16 µg mL−1. We found different nonsynonymous mutations in the cyp51A, cyp51B, Cdr1B, AtrR, Hmg1, HapE and FfmA gene loci. According to our findings, Aspergillus species isolated from different parts of the world may represent different pattern of resistance mechanisms which may be revealed by WGS.

1. Introduction

The mycoses caused by Aspergillus spp. include a wide variety of pathophysiological disorders, ranging from allergic manifestations to systemic infections [1]. Among the invasive fungal diseases (IFD), invasive aspergillosis (IA) is one of the most severe clinical entities, with mortality rates up to 70% in more than 300,000 cases estimated worldwide [2]. Although several studies have been focused on the most common species of Aspergillus including A. fumigatus and A. flavus, using molecular taxonomic tools, cryptic/rare Aspergillus species have recently been identified [3]. Hence, there is a growing awareness about the clinical relevance of Aspergillus cryptic species in the development of IA [4,5]. According to clinical observations, the epidemiological distribution of cryptic Aspergillus species are associated with invasive infections and often falls into the sections Fumigati, Flavi, Nigri, and Terrei [6]. Azole derivatives are regarded as the first-line options for the prophylactic treatment of IA [7]. Among azole antifungals, itraconazole (ITC) is widely used in medicine and veterinary treatment. This antifungal agent was considered as the treatment of choice for chronic pulmonary aspergillosis [8], and have been proposed as an alternative treatment for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis and the management of patients with severe asthma [9] An unsettled dilemma in managing aspergillosis crisis is the emergence of azole-resistance in Aspergillus spp., a phenomenon that stems from intricate mechanisms [10]. Due to the global rampancy of A. fumigatus, major studies have been steered to scrutinize the mechanisms and understand the roots of resistance against triazoles derivatives including ITC in environmental and clinical isolates [11,12,13]. With trailing the function of genes, it is inferred that occurrence of point mutations in cyp51 gene paralogs (cyp51A and cyp51B) in A. fumigatus, A. niger and A. terreus are the most common genomic changes leading to azole resistance [14]. In response to triazoles acting on the locus of cyp51A and cyp51B genes, resulting mutation manifests as a non-synonymous substitution that alters the sequence of encoded proteins and thus resistant mutants are aroused [15,16]. However, mutation in non-cyp51 gene including ATP-binding cassette transporters (Cdr1B or abcG1), AtrR, Hmg1, HapE and FfmA gene loci have been recently reported [17,18,19,20,21]. In recent years, whole genome sequencing (WGS) and bioinformatics methodologies have gained traction in the diagnostic field as potent appliances for detecting antifungal resistance in medical mycology [22]. Using WGS with a high number of clinical and environmental isolates of A. fumigatus, Rhodes et al. [23] showed that a strong genetic structuring into different clades with little interclade recombination, high confidence documents to show that transmission of resistant isolates occurs from the environment to the infected patients. The selective sweeps across multiple regions indicate a polygenic basis to traits in some genetic backgrounds, and the genes related to the azole resistance with previously unknown resistance mechanisms. Since WGS is a high-throughput technology that reads out the whole genomic content, it provides high-resolution images of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at different points in the DNA of the target microorganism, which allows for wider genomic analysis as compared to primer design -based techniques [24]. In light of lack of information on WGS related to azole-resistant Aspergillus spp. and the importance of clinically relevant and cryptic species of Aspergillus, we evaluated the function of WGS to detect the genomic variations of cyp51A, cyp51B, Cdr1B, AtrR, Hmg1, HapE and FfmA genes in ITC-resistant isolates of A. fumigatus (section Fumigati), A. terreus (section Terrei), A. niger, A. tubingensis, and A. welwitschia (section Nigri).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Clinical Isolates

A total of seven identified (using molecular techniques by sequencing of the β-tubulin-encoding gene (benA)) Aspergillus isolates including A. fumigatus (AF), A. niger (AN) and A. welwitschiae (AW), and A. tubingensis (AT1 and AT2) and A. terreus (AR1 and AR2) that responded to minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ITC above 16 µg mL−1 were included in the study. Table 1 shows the clinical source and accession number of isolates.

2.2. Molecular Identification

DNA was extracted from fungal colonies grown for 5–7 days on malt extract agar (Difco, Detroit, MI, USA) using a previously described method [25]. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for partial amplification of the benA was performed using forward and reverse primers Bt2a (5′-GGTAACCAAATCGGTGCTGCTTTC-3′) and Bt2b (5′-ACCCTCAGTGTAGTGACCCTTGGC-3′), respectively [26]. PCR products were analyzed by gel electrophoresis using 1.5% agarose gels, and the amplified benA fragments were sequenced using the same primers with the ABI3730xL Genetic Analyzer platform (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). All sequences were subjected to nucleotide BLAST search of the NCBI database and the molecular database of the WI-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Center (Utrecht, The Netherlands), and isolates were identified up to the species level.

2.3. Antifungal Susceptibility Testing

Antifungal susceptibility test (AFST) was fulfilled as a 2× microdilution broth method based on the Clinical and Laboratory standards Institute (CLSI)-M38-A3 instructions [27]. The azole antifungals evaluated in this study were ITC, voriconazole (VOR), posaconazole (POS), and isavuconazole (ISV) that purchased from Merck Sharp and Dohme BV, Haarlem, The Netherlands. To test antifungal susceptibility, a suspension of each isolate was prepared in RPMI 1640 broth medium (absorbance reading, A530 of 0.09 to 0.13). Five azole derivatives mentioned above were also diluted in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Aspergillus suspensions in 96-well plates were exposed to azoles by 2× dilution (ranging from 0.016 to 16 μg mL−1) and incubated at 35 °C for 48 h. Candida parapsilosis (ATCC 22019) and Pichia kudriavzevii (ATCC 6258) were used as quality control strains. The MIC of the isolates was evaluated and after comparing with defined ECV values in CLSI supplement M59, non-wild type (NWT) isolates were identified.

2.4. Workflow of Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS)

DNA extraction was performed on each isolate after a three-day culture with the DNA extraction kit (SimBiolab, Mashhad, Iran). Genomic DNAs were quantified and assessed qualitatively using gel electrophoresis and NanoDrop spectrophotometer. The extracted gDNAs were transferred to Novogene (Tianjin, China) for genomic sequencing using GenTegra-DNA tubes (USA), which protect against degradation. Prior to starting the sequencing process, an RNAase treatment step was also considered to improve gDNAs purity. The DNAs were subjected to a 5400 fragment analyzer system, designed to meet the needs of ensuring their quantity, integrity and purity, as the preliminary assaying types. The libraries were prepared at Novogene Bioinformatics Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China) using TruSeq® DNA PCR-Free Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s recommendation. In brief the genomic DNA was randomly sheared into short fragments. Then, the obtained fragments were end repaired, A-tailed and further ligated with Illumina adapter. The fragments with adapters were PCR amplified, size selected, and purified. The quality of the prepared libraries was assessed using Qubit and real-time PCR. At that time, a library was prepared according to each of the targeted isolates. After going through all these steps, all DNA samples were sequenced using paired-end 150 based pair sequencing. As part of our whole-genome sequencing project, we used an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 system, and the sequencing depth for the isolates was 100×. To conclude, data generated by Illumina platform were processed via CLC genomics workbench 21 software (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany) according to following steps:
i.
The forward and reverse sequencing data were imported into the software using Illumina High-Throughput Sequencing import option (Illumina Pipeline 1.8) in which the data were paired-ended, de-multiplexed and trimmed. The failed reads were also discarded.
ii.
The quality of the sequencing data was assessed using quality control of the software which include a complete list of lengths and quality distribution, GC content, ambiguous base-content, nucleotide contributions, sequence duplication levels and the sequence of the duplicated reads.
iii.
The reference sequence of each species was downloaded from NCBI (Table 2) and used as a reference for data mapping and resequencing using the Map Reads to Reference option of the software, then the quality of the mappings was assessed using QC for Read mapping and Genome Coverage Analysis option of the software.
iv.
The variant calling of the assembled sequencing data was performed using Basic Variant Detection option of the software, then each variant was also annotated manually of the target genes for confirmation.
v.
Finally, the functional consequences of the variations was determined using Amino Acid Change option of the software by comparison of the variant tracks of the assembled sequence with the references.
All DNA sequence data were uploaded to NCBI SRA-submission portal (https://submit.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/subs/sra/ (accessed on 20 Novamber 2021)). In Figure 1, the steps from the research are depicted.

2.5. Homology Modeling and Mutation Mappings

The primary amino acid sequence for CYP51A of A. fumigatus (XP_752137.1), A.welwitschiae (XP_026629604.1), Aspergillus niger (XP_001394224.1), Aspergillus tubingensis (XP_035357535.1) and Aspergillus terreus (XP_001215095.1) were used to find appropriate template for homology modeling of the 3D structure of each protein using ICM-Pro software (Molsoft L.L.C., San Diego, CA, USA). Each template was imported into the software, refined and minimized then used for homology modeling as described previously [28].

3. Results

3.1. Determination of MIC

The MIC values for seven isolates tested with ITC, VOR, POS, and ISV are provided in chart 1. Due to the presence of an ECV definition in CLSI M59 supplement for A. fumigatus, A. niger, and A. terreus, the MIC profiles of the four isolates AF, AN, AR1, and AR2 were comparable. AF, AN, AT1 and AT2 response to ITC with MIC > 16, POS = 1, VOR = 2, 1, 1 and 0.5, ISV = 1, 2, 0.5 and 0.5, respectively. The four isolates with MIC > 16 to ITC were therefore identified as NWT isolates (Figure 2A). For the three isolates AW, AT1 and AT2, there was no standard ECV to comparison. AW, AT1 and AT2 isolates showed MIC > 16 to ITC, MIC = 1 to POS, MIC = 2, 2 and 0.25 to VOR and MIC = 2, 0.5 and 1 to ISV, respectively (Figure 2B).
The detailed information on the isolates is also accesible in our recent published paper [3].

3.2. DNA Quality Control (QC) Report

During quality control, all seven isolates passed the criteria for integrity, concentration, and purity. DNA concentrations were between 50 and 75 ng/μL, and integrity tests yielded satisfactory upshots.

3.3. Homology Modeling and Mutation Mappings

Conformational structure of A. welwitschiae was not shown as the V16L mutation is located on the signal peptide of CYP51A.
In the current study, different mutations were identified and mapped on the structure of the modeled CYP51A. As illustrated in Figure 3, some mutations were located near the channel entry especially in A. Fumigatus (Figure 3D) but far from the active site of the proteins. This could provide a potential mechanism for azole resistance by limiting the access of inhibitors to the active site.

3.4. Bioinformatics Analysis

Upon alignment of the sequences of cyp51A, cyp51B, Cdr1B, AtrR, Hmg1, HapE and FfmA as target genes confines of the seven isolates with the reference sequences deposited in NCBI, genomic variations were detected at different positions, which are depicted in Table 2. The intron sequences have been removed in the raw data processing process. The SNP positions in Table 2 are based on DNA coding sequences (CDS) that corresponds to the sequence of amino acids in a protein. Four nonsynonymous mutations have been identified in cyp51A sequence (T137A (F/Y), A514G (M/V), A743T (N/T) and C765G (D/E)) of A. niger isolate. Although the occurrence of the other four SNPs did not start off amino acid changes (G267A, A1047G, G1279A and T1362C). A. niger isolate contained three nonsynonymous substitutions (A169G (T/A), A683G (Q/R) and G1147C (V/L)) and eleven silent substitutions across the cyp51A gene. In cyp51B gene, variation at points A800T (N/I) and A1184C (N/T) also altered the protein sequence. A solitary A. welwitschiae (AW) isolate was consorted with one and three replacement mutations in cyp51A (G46C (V/L)) and cyp51B genes (A440G (E/G), T525A (N/K), and A2785G (I/V)), respectively. Two isolates of A. tubingensis with AT1 and AT2 codes revealed dissimilar genomic changes in the cyp51A and cyp51B genes. The former showed only one nonsynonymous mutation in the cyp51A target (C166T (L/F)) and the latter showed the same pattern as the reference genome in the cyp51A target. The amino acid sequences of isolates AT1 and AT2 were unaffected by point mutations in the cyp51A and cyp51B genetic codes. A. terreus isolates also gave different results. For AR1, replacement mutations at C662T (A/V) of the cyp51A gene, and at T1166G (T/S) of the cyp51B gene were unmask. In the second isolate of A. terreus, AR2, a silent mutation was spotted in the cyp51A gene, while no meaningful variance was stood up along the cyp51B gene as compared to reference sequence. It has been found that all seven AN, AF, AW, AT1, AT2, AR1 and AR2 isolates ultimately showed resistance to ITC following occurrence of substitution mutations at different loci of cyp51A and cyp51B and as target genes under study (Table 2). In non-cyp51 gene loci, nonsynonymous mutations have been identified in different isolates as follows:
A. welwitschiae in Cdr1B (one mutation), Hmg1 (five mutations) and HapE (one mutation).
A. fumigatus in AtrR and Hmg1 (two mutations, each).
A. niger in Cdr1B (four mutations), AtrR (two mutations) and Hmg1 (one mutation).
Isolate AT1 of A. tubingensis in Cdr1B (tow mutations), HapE (one mutation) and FfmA (two mutations). Isolate AT2 in AtrR and FfmA (two mutations, each).
Isolate AR1 of A. terreus showed one mutation in HapE locus and AR2 in Cdr1B (one mutation), and AtrR (tow mutations) (Table 2).
Our data is associated with an NCBI BioProject accession, PRJNA845900.
Table 2. The list of nonsynonymous substitutions along different gene loci in study Aspergillus isolates.
Table 2. The list of nonsynonymous substitutions along different gene loci in study Aspergillus isolates.
SpeciesBioSample AccessionsCyp51ACyp51BCdr1BAtrRHmg1HapEFfmAReference Accession Number
AWSAMN28864578G46C (V/L)A561G (E/GT646A (N/K) A4438G (I/V)C4755T (H/Y)-G219A (G/N)
G498A (G/E)
T1342C (V/A)
G1524C (V/L)
C1828G (T/S)
A133C (K/T)-GeneID:38137106 GeneID:38137970
GeneID:38143887
GeneID:38132489
GeneID:38143658
GeneID:38145110
GeneID:38137721
AFSAMN28864579A137T (Y/F) G514A (V/M) C743A (T/N)
G765C (E/D)
A1279G (K/E)
--G2092C (H/D)
C2272T (P/S)
T697C (S/P)
T1803C (Y/H)
--GeneID:3509526
GeneID:3506370
GeneID:3509814
GeneID:3506650
GeneID:3506671
GeneID:3505192
GeneID:3512958
ANSAMN28864580A267G (T/A) A838G (Q/R) G1302C (V/L)A1072T (N/I) A11456C (N/T)G1905T (A/S)
A1996G (D/G)
C2921A (D/E)
CT4987-8TC (Y/H)
T2417C (F/S)
G2794A (A/T)
T1605G (D/E)
--GeneID:4984452
GeneID:4986453
GeneID:4977469
GeneID:4981973
GeneID:4982097
GeneID:37104718
GeneID:4979089
AT1SAMN28864581C383T (L/F)
A1390G (T/A)
-G1069A (V/I)
T4554G (S/A)
--C756G (A/G)T1293C(S/P)
T1468C(F/S)
GeneID:56006014
GeneID:56008603
GeneID:56003599
GeneID:56007043
GeneID:56006955
GeneID:56001387
GeneID:56005349
AT2SAMN28864582---C2687A (T/N)
A2767G (T/A)
--T1293C(S/P)
T1468C(F/S)
GeneID:56006014
GeneID:56008603
GeneID:56003599
GeneID:56007043
GeneID:56006955
GeneID:56001387
GeneID:56005349
AR1SAMN28864583C706T (A/V)C1280G (T/S)---T1103C (F/S)-GeneID:4321797
GeneID:4317693
GeneID:4319285
GeneID:4318923
GeneID:4354193
GeneID:4321255
GeneID:4315909
AR2SAMN28864584--A3279T (E/D)A70C (N/H)
A2735C (Q/H)
---GeneID:4321797
GeneID:4317693
GeneID:4319285
GeneID:4318923
GeneID:4354193
GeneID:4321255
GeneID:4315909

4. Discussion

Among susceptible patients with impaired immune functions for a variety of reasons, such as solid organ transplant recipients and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, A. fumigatus, A. niger, A. terreus, and A. flavus are the most common isolated species of IA, but the role of cryptic species should not be overlooked [29]. Species that appear to be cryptic might be neglected because of misidentification and therefore, it would be difficult to assess their epidemiological distribution pattern and antifungal susceptibility profile [5]. Antifungal susceptibility pattern, and rate and mechanism of resistance in ITC as a main agent in management and prophylaxis of aspergillosis against different species of Aspergillus have been analyzed in different countries [30,31,32,33,34,35]. In vitro activity of azoles determined by CLSI method against different opportunistic filamentous fungal pathogens including Aspergillus species from the Asia and Western Pacific Region, the data from the SENTRY Antifungal Surveillance Program (2011–2019) showed the ITC MIC50/90 as 0.5/1 mg L−1 for A. fumigatus, A. flavus and A. terreus and 1/2 mg L−1 for A. niger. The overall frequency of NWT strains (MICs above the ECVs) of A. fumigatus, A. flavus, A. terreus and A. niger were 2.1%, 0, 0 and 2.2% for ITC, respectively [30]. The similar MIC50/90 results for A. fumigatus, Aspergillus section Flavi, Terri and Nigri were reported in another large-scale study which analyzed 1775 isolates of Aspergillus spp. collected from Europe, North America, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific region from 2010–2017 [31]. They also reported an overall frequency of NWT strains of A. fumigatus as 0.9% for ITC. In addition, Europe displayed the highest NWT rates for ITC (1.7%) when compared to other regions (0.0–0.7%). During 2015 to 2019, Guegan et al. [32] analyzed a total of 929 A. fumigatus isolates from patients with cystic fibrosis for azole resistance. The rate of ITC resistant A. fumigatus isolates was 14.5% (95/656); they were recovered from 44/308 (14.3%) patients. The median MIC of ITC-resistant isolates was 14 mg/L−1.
In a recently published study from Iran [33] MIC/MIC50/90 values of ITC were reported for Aspergillus section Fumigati and Nigri as 4/≥8 µg mL−1 (each) and 0.5/1 µg mL−1 for Aspergillus section Terrei. They also no NWT strains reported in 233 Aspergillus isolates collected from 11 university hospitals in Iran. In addition, in two other studies from Iran, none of the A. terreus isolates [34] and different species of aspergillus including A. tubingensis and A. niger [35] had a MIC of ≥ ECV for ITC. In contrast to these studies, Nargesi et al. [3] reported a rate of 7.3% of NWT strains of A. niger against ITC. They also reported MIC50/90 for A. niger and A. tubingensis against ITC as 0.25/0.5 and 0.5/16 µg mL−1, respectively. In this current study, all tested Aspergillus species represented MICs under ECV against VOR, ISV and POS but MIC > 16 to ITC.
Despite all the measures that have been taken in the field of diagnosis of IA, the increasing prevalence of azole resistance has been found as a barrier in controlling this disease [36]. Small whole genome sequencing is a powerful technique which is used to capture variants throughout the entire genomic content of fungi and it provides a large amount of information in a short period of time compared to the approach target (such as Sanger sequencing) [37]. In azole-resistant strains of Aspergillus spp., the cyp51A and cyp51B genes may be exposed to polymorphism occurrence [13] The evidences gleaned from whole genome sequencing of Aspergillus paved the way for a clear description of how these genes operate without efforts to design multiple primers [14]. In regard to A. fumigatus, the majority of the existing data on tracking the effects of SNPs concentrate on defined sequences, such as the promoter region, TR34/L98H, of the cyp51A gene [38,39]. A. niger and A. tubingensis are two closely related species in the section Nigri [40]. The antifungal susceptibility profiles of these two species have already been reported in Iran [41] and in other countries [42]. A. fumigatus is more clear-cut in mechanisms of azole resistance than black aspergilli. Howard et al. [43] study on cyp51A gene mutations in multiple A. niger isolates showed contradictions in the concerned clades. They reported no mutation-related azole resistance in cyp51A gene in one clade, while six replacement mutations occurred in A. niger isolates of the other clade. Despite that, in our work, which overshadowed a larger scale of the genome, A. niger, with the exception of 15 silent mutations detected in the cyp51A and cyp51B genes, 3 and 2 replacement mutations were detected in cyp51A and cyp51B genes, respectively. Additionally, we detected 20 and 21 silent mutations in the cyp51B gene in A. tubingensis (isolates AT1 and AT2), respectively, despite the lack of mutations in the cyp51B gene (Table 2). A. welwitschiae is another member of the section Nigri [44]. Recent research showed that among the A. niger complex species, A. welwitschiae has a high isolation rate from clinical cases [39]. On the other hand, the antifungal susceptibility trend of A. welwitschiae has also been shown a higher MIC to VOR [45]. However, there is no exact information on how azole resistance has developed in A. welwitschiae. Based on the evidence from the whole genome sequencing of A. welwitschiae, substitutions at cyp51A and cyp51B, the two major target genes in A. welwitschiae isolate, as well as polymorphisms at multiple sites of target loci may explain the mechanism of ITC-resistance in our study. Zoran et al. [46] conducted a wide-range study on the azole resistance mechanism in Aspergillus terreus. Analysis of cyp51A gene, SNPs on 26 A. terreus isolates revealed that substitution at positions T650C, A649G, G1030A, and A956G resulted in changes in amino acid sequences. In another study performed by Rivero-Menendez et al. [47] on 12 triazole-resistant isolates of A. terreus, substitutions in D344N were perceived in two isolates and M217I in one isolate. In this study, between two isolates of A. terreus, only AR2 isolate showed a non-synonymous point mutation in the cyp51A and cyp51B genes separately (Table 2).
According to our findings, Aspergillus species isolated from different parts of the world may represent different pattern of resistant mechanisms including mutation in cyp51A and cyp51B genes which is clearly revealed by WGS. To show this, we made a literature review on the reported mutation in Aspergillus fumigatus revealed by Sanger sequencing of cyp51A and cyp51B genes (Table 3).
In this present study, we also evaluated non-cyp51 gene loci for mutations to study Aspergillus isolates. This is the first report from Iran. According to our findings, many mutations were observed in different isolates. The most isolates showed simultaneously mutations in cyp51 and non-cyp51 gene loci. However, one isolate of A. tubingensis (AT1) and A. terreus (AR2) did not show cyp51 mutations but AT2 and AR2 isolates showed mutations in AtrR, and Cdr1B and AtrR, respectively. A. fumigatus and AT1 (A. tubingensis) showed no mutations in cyp51B. However, they revealed mutations in non-cyp51 genes including AtrR and Hmg1, and Cdr1B, HapE and FfmA, respectively. It is worth to note that mutations in cyp51A gene associated with azole resistance are well known. However, different studies have been recently reported that some other gene loci including ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters (Cdr1B), AtrR, Hmg1, HapE and FfmA are required for wild-type azole resistance in A. fumigatus as the most studied species in Aspergillus genus [17,18,19,20,21]. Likewise, it was suggested that the most common azole resistance allele currently described is a linked change corresponding to a change in the coding sequence of cyp51A and a duplication of a 34-bp region in the promoter leading to a tandem repeat [40,48]. Paul et al. [18] also identified a positively acting transcription factor called AtrR that binds to the promoter of cyp51A as well as that of an important membrane transporter protein gene called Cdr1B (abcG1). These evidences have shown that non-cyp51 gene loci such as Cdr1B, AtrR, Hmg1, HapE and FfmA are required for the synergistic increase in azole resistance and regulation of many different processes involved in drug resistance. Our finding on the homology modeling and mutation mappings of CYP51A of the selected Aspergillus species also suggest that the cyp51A may need other gene loci to cause azole resistance in Aspergillus species.
Table 3. An overview of the effects of point mutations on the emergence of azole resistance in Aspergillus spp. in the past decade.
Table 3. An overview of the effects of point mutations on the emergence of azole resistance in Aspergillus spp. in the past decade.
Aspergillus spp.Target GenesPoint MutationsMutation ResultsAuthors (Year) [Reference]
A. fumigatusCyp51ATR34/L98HObservation of ITC-Resistant isolates + Observation of VOR-resistant isolatesCamps et al. (2012) [49]
A. fumigatusCyp51ATR34/L98HObservation of Triazole-Resistant isolatesChowdhary et al. (2012) [50]
A. fumigatusCyp51ATR34/L98H
TR46/Y121F/T289A
Observation of ITC-Resistant isolates
Observation of VOR-Resistant isolates
Astvad et al. (2014) [51]
A. fumigatusCyp51ATR34/L98HObservation of ITC-Resistant isolatesAhmad et al. (2014) [52]
A. fumigatusCyp51ATR34/L98H
TR46/Y121F/T289A
Observation of Triazole-Resistant isolates
Observation of Triazole-Resistant isolates
van Ingen et al.
(2015) [53]
A. fumigatusCyp51ATR34/L98H
F46Y, D255E, and M172- G54E
Observation of Triazole-Resistant isolates
Observation of Triazole-Resistant isolates
-High MICs to both ITC and POS
Chowdhary et al. (2015) [54]
A. fumigatusCyp51ATR34/L98HObservation of ITC-Resistant isolates + Observation of VOR-resistant isolatesNabili et al. (2016) [55]
A. fumigatusCyp51ATR34/L98H
TR46/Y121F/T289A
Observation of ITC-Resistant isolates + Observation of VOR-resistant isolatesWiederhold et al. (2016) [56]
A. fumigatusCyp51ATR34/L98HObservation of ITC-Resistant isolates + Observation of VOR-resistant isolatesMohammadi et al. (2016) [57]
A. fumigatusCyp51ATR34/L98HObservation of ITC-Resistant isolatesHurst et al. (2017) [58]
A. fumigatusCyp51ATR34/L98H
TR34/L98H/S297T/F495I
G54V
Observation of ITC-Resistant isolatesDeng et al. (2017) [59]
A. fumigatusCyp51ATR34/L98H/S297T/F495IObservation of ITC-Resistant isolatesChen et al. (2018) [60]
A. fumigatusCyp51ATR34/L98HObservation of ITC-Resistant isolatesMorio et al. (2018) [61]
A. fumigatusCyp51ATR 34/L98HObservation isolates with high MICs for ITC, VOR and POSPaluch et al. (2019) [62]
A. fumigatusCyp51ATR34/L98H
G448S
M220I
Observation of ITC-Resistant isolatesTsuchido et al. (2019) [63]
A. fumigatusCyp51ATR34/L98H/S297T/F495IObservation isolates with high MICs for ITC, VOR and MCZPontes et al. (2020) [64]
A. fumigatusCyp51ATR34/L98HObservation of VOR-Resistant isolatesZhang et al. (2020) [65]
A. fumigatusCyp51ATR34/L98H
G448S
Observation of ITC-Resistant isolates
Observation of VOR-resistant isolates
Gonzalez-Jimenez et al. (2021) [38]
A. fumigatusCyp51BG457SObservation of ITC-Resistant isolates + Observation of VOR-resistant isolates+ Observation of POS-resistant isolates+ Observation of ISV-resistant isolatesGonzalez-Jimenez et al. (2020) [16]

5. Conclusions

Our study indicates that cryptic species not only have a spread in clinical cases but also a high proportion of point mutations leading to azole resistance in their genomic composition. There is a possibility to say that this volume of mutations did not occur all at once in cryptic species, but the techniques of identifying these species have entered a new era and with the correct identification of species, researchers have been able to observe and confront the mutations that occur continuously. Further studies on the effect of mutations in cyp51 and non-cyp51 gene loci to cause clinical resistance in Aspergillus isolates are warranted.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.T.H. and S.N.; methodology, S.N. and R.V.; software, R.V. and S.N.; validation, S.K. and M.T.H.; formal analysis, S.K.; investigation, M.A.; resources, M.T.H. and M.A.; data curation, M.A.; writing—original draft preparation, S.N.; writing—review and editing, M.T.H., SN. and J.T.; supervision, M.T.H. and J.T.; project administration, M.T.H.; funding acquisition, M.T.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Invasive Fungi Research Center of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran, grant number 7123. This study is a part of PhD thesis of Sanaz Nargesi (Code:2431).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences (protocol code: IR.MAZUMS.REC.1399.536).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vadlapudi, V.; Borah, N.; Yellusani, K.R.; Gade, S.; Reddy, P.; Rajamanikyam, M.; Vempati, L.N.S.; Gubbala, S.P.; Chopra, P.; Upadhyayula, S.M. Aspergillus secondary metabolite database, a resource to understand the secondary metabolome of Aspergillus genus. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Bongomin, F.; Gago, S.; Oladele, R.O.; Denning, D.W. Global and multi-national prevalence of fungal diseases—Estimate precision. J. Fungi 2017, 3, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Nargesi, S.; Jafarzadeh, J.; Najafzadeh, M.J.; Nouripour-Sisakht, S.; Haghani, I.; Abastabar, M.; Ilkit, M.; Hedayati, M.T. Molecular identification and antifungal susceptibility of clinically relevant and cryptic species of Aspergillus sections Flavi and Nigri. J. Med. Microbiol. 2022, 71, 001480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Tsang, C.C.; Tang, J.Y.; Ye, H.; Xing, F.; Lo, S.K.; Xiao, C.; Han, L.; Wu, A.K.; Ngan, A.H.; Law, K.C. Rare/cryptic Aspergillus species infections and importance of antifungal susceptibility testing. Mycoses 2020, 63, 1283–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Imbert, S.; Cassaing, S.; Bonnal, C.; Normand, A.C.; Gabriel, F.; Costa, D.; Blaize, M.; Lachaud, L.; Hasseine, L.; Kristensen, L. Invasive aspergillosis due to Aspergillus cryptic species: A prospective multicentre study. Mycoses 2021, 64, 1346–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sugui, J.A.; Kwon-Chung, K.J.; Juvvadi, P.R.; Latgé, J.-P.; Steinbach, W.J. Aspergillus fumigatus and related species. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2015, 5, a019786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Ullmann, A.J.; Aguado, J.M.; Arikan-Akdagli, S.; Denning, D.W.; Groll, A.H.; Lagrou, K.; Lass-Flörl, C.; Lewis, R.E.; Munoz, P.; Verweij, P.E. Diagnosis and management of Aspergillus diseases: Executive summary of the 2017 ESCMID-ECMM-ERS guideline. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2018, 24, e1–e38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Denning, D.W.; Cadranel, J.; Beigelman-Aubry, C.; Ader, F.; Chakrabarti, A.; Blot, S.; Ullmann, A.J.; Dimopoulos, G.; Lange, C. Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis: Rationale and clinical guidelines for diagnosis and management. Eur. Respir. J. 2016, 47, 45–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Rapeport, W.G.; Ito, K.; Denning, D.W. The role of antifungals in the management of patients with severe asthma. Clin. Transl. Allergy 2020, 10, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Garcia-Rubio, R.; Cuenca-Estrella, M.; Mellado, E. Triazole resistance in Aspergillus species: An emerging problem. Drugs 2017, 77, 599–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wiederhold, N.P.; Verweij, P.E. Aspergillus fumigatus and pan-azole resistance: Who should be concerned? Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 33, 290–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Fisher, M.C.; Hawkins, N.J.; Sanglard, D.; Gurr, S.J. Worldwide emergence of resistance to antifungal drugs challenges human health and food security. Science 2018, 360, 739–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Abdolrasouli, A.; Rhodes, J.; Beale, M.A.; Hagen, F.; Rogers, T.R.; Chowdhary, A.; Meis, J.F.; Armstrong-James, D.; Fisher, M.C. Genomic Context of Azole Resistance Mutations in Aspergillus fumigatus Determined Using Whole-Genome Sequencing. mBio 2015, 6, e00536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Hagiwara, D.; Watanabe, A.; Kamei, K.; Goldman, G.H. Epidemiological and Genomic Landscape of Azole Resistance Mechanisms in Aspergillus Fungi. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Macedo, D.; Brito Devoto, T.; Pola, S.; Finquelievich, J.L.; Cuestas, M.L.; Garcia-Effron, G. A novel combination of CYP51A mutations confers pan-azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e02501–e02519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gonzalez-Jimenez, I.; Lucio, J.; Amich, J.; Cuesta, I.; Sanchez Arroyo, R.; Alcazar-Fuoli, L.; Mellado, E. A Cyp51B mutation contributes to azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Paul, S.; Diekema, D.; Moye-Rowley, W.S. Contributions of both ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter and Cyp51A Proteins Are Essential for Azole Resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e02748-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Paul, S.; Stamnes, M.; Thomas, G.H.; Liu, H.; Hagiwara, D.; Gomi, K.; Filler, S.G.; Moye-Rowley, S.W. AtrR Is Essential Determinant of Azole Resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. mBio 2019, 10, e02563-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Resendiz-Sharpe, A.; Hokken, M.W.J.; Mercier, T.; Merckx, R.; Verhagen, K.; Dewitte, L.; Melchers, W.J.G.; Verweij, P.E.; Maertens, J.; Lagrou, K. Hmg1 Gene Mutation Prevalence in Triazole-Resistant Aspergillus fumigatus Clinical Isolates. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hortschansky, P.; Misslinger, M.; Mörl, J.; Gsaller, F.; Bromley, M.J.; Brakhage, A.A.; Groll, M.; Haas, H.; Huber, E.M. Structural basis of HapE P88L-linked antifungal triazole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. Life Sci. Alliance 2020, 3, e202000729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Paul, S.; Bowyer, P.; Bromley, M.; Moye-Rowley, W.S. Aspergillus fumigatus ffmA Encodes a C 2 H 2-Containing Transcriptional Regulator That Modulates Azole Resistance and Is Required for Normal Growth. mSphere 2022, 7, e0093821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Cuomo, C.A. Harnessing whole genome sequencing in medical mycology. Curr. Fungal Infect. Rep. 2017, 11, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Rhodes, J.; Abdolrasouli, A.; Dunne, K.; Sewell, T.R.; Zhang, Y.; Ballard, E.; Brackin, A.P.; van Rhijn, N.; Chown, H.; Tsitsopoulou, A.; et al. Population genomics confirms acquisition of drug-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus infection by humans from the environment. Nat. Microbiol. 2022, 7, 663–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chen, X.; He, G.; Wang, S.; Lin, S.; Chen, J.; Zhang, W. Evaluation of whole-genome sequence method to diagnose resistance of 13 anti-tuberculosis drugs and characterize resistance genes in clinical multi-drug resistance Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from China. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Jin, J.; Lee, Y.-K.; Wickes, B. Simple chemical extraction method for DNA isolation from Aspergillus fumigatus and other Aspergillus species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 4293–4296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Samson, R.; Visagie, C.; Houbraken, J.; Hong, S.; Hubka, V.; Klaassen, C.; Perrone, G.; Seifert, K.; Susca, A.; Tanney, J. Phylogeny, identification and nomenclature of the genus Aspergillus. Mycology 2014, 78, 141–173. [Google Scholar]
  27. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). CLSI Standard M38-A3; Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Filamentous Fungi. 3rd ed. CLSI: Wayne, PA, USA, 2017.
  28. Keighobadi, M.; Emami, S.; Lagzian, M.; Fakhar, M.; Rafiei, A.; Valadan, R. Molecular Modeling and Structural Stability of Wild-Type and Mutant CYP51 from Leishmania major: In Vitro and In Silico Analysis of a Laboratory Strain. Molecules 2018, 23, 696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Puerta-Alcalde, P.; Garcia-Vidal, C. Changing Epidemiology of Invasive Fungal Disease in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pfaller, M.A.; Carvalhaes, C.G.; Rhomberg, P.; Messer, S.A.; Castanheira, M. Antifungal susceptibilities of opportunistic filamentous fungal pathogens from the Asia and Western Pacific Region: Data from the SENTRY Antifungal Surveillance Program (2011–2019). J. Antibiot. 2021, 74, 519–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pfaller, M.A.; Carvalhaes, C.G.; Messer, S.A.; Rhomberg, P.R.; Castanheira, M. In vitro activity of posaconazole and comparators versus opportunistic filamentous fungal pathogens globally collected during 8 years. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2021, 101, 115473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Guegan, H.; Prat, E.; Robert-Gangneux, F.; Gangneux, J.P. Azole Resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus: A Five-Year Follow Up Experience in a Tertiary Hospital With a Special Focus on Cystic Fibrosis. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 10, 613774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Badiee, P.; Boekhout, T.; Zarei Mahmoudabadi, A.; Mohammadi, R.; Ayatollahi Mousavi, S.A.; Najafzadeh, M.J.; Soltani, J.; Hashemi, J.; Diba, K.; Ghadimi-Moghadam, A.; et al. Multicenter Study of Susceptibility of Aspergillus Species Isolated from Iranian University Hospitals to Seven Antifungal Agents. Microbiol Spectr. 2022, 10, e0253921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Vaezi, A.; Fakhim, H.; Arastehfar, A.; Shokohi, T.; Hedayati, M.T.; Khodavaisy, S.; Rezaei-Matehkolaei, A.; Badiee, P.; Hagen, F.; Lass-Flörl, C.; et al. In vitro antifungal activity of amphotericin B and 11 comparators against Aspergillus terreus species complex. Mycoses 2018, 61, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kiakojuri, K.; Mahdavi Omran, S.; Roodgari, S.; Taghizadeh Armaki, M.; Hedayati, M.T.; Shokohi, T.; Haghani, I.; Javidnia, J.; Kermani, F.; Badali, H.; et al. Molecular Identification and Antifungal Susceptibility of Yeasts and Molds Isolated from Patients with Otomycosis. Mycopathologia 2021, 186, 245–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Slavin, M.A.; Chen, Y.-C.; Cordonnier, C.; Cornely, O.A.; Cuenca-Estrella, M.; Donnelly, J.P.; Groll, A.H.; Lortholary, O.; Marty, F.M.; Nucci, M. When to change treatment of acute invasive aspergillosis: An expert viewpoint. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2022, 77, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tully, I. Clinical applications of next-generation sequencing. In Clinical Molecular Medicine; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 57–69. [Google Scholar]
  38. Gonzalez-Jimenez, I.; Lucio, J.; Menéndez-Fraga, M.D.; Mellado, E.; Peláez, T. Hospital Environment as a Source of Azole-Resistant Aspergillus fumigatus Strains with TR34/L98H and G448S Cyp51A Mutations. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fisher, M.C.; Alastruey-Izquierdo, A.; Berman, J.; Bicanic, T.; Bignell, E.M.; Bowyer, P.; Bromley, M.; Brüggemann, R.; Garber, G.; Cornely, O.A. Tackling the emerging threat of antifungal resistance to human health. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2022, 20, 557–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Varga, J.; Frisvad, J.C.; Kocsubé, S.; Brankovics, B.; Tóth, B.; Szigeti, G.; Samson, R. New and revisited species in Aspergillus section Nigri. Stud. Mycol. 2007, 58, 33–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Szigeti, G.; Sedaghati, E.; Mahmoudabadi, A.Z.; Naseri, A.; Kocsube, S.; Vágvölgyi, C.; Varga, J. Species assignment and antifungal susceptibilities of black aspergilli recovered from otomycosis cases in Iran. Mycoses 2012, 55, 333–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Vidal-Acuña, M.R.; Ruiz, M.; Torres, M.J.; Aznar, J. Prevalence and in vitro antifungal susceptibility of cryptic species of the genus Aspergillus isolated in clinical samples. Enferm. Infecc. Y Microbiol. Clin. Engl. Ed. 2019, 37, 296–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Howard, S.J.; Harrison, E.; Bowyer, P.; Varga, J.; Denning, D.W. Cryptic species and azole resistance in the Aspergillus niger complex. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 4802–4809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Massi, F.P.; Iamanaka, B.T.; Barbosa, R.L.; Sartori, D.; Ferrranti, L.; Taniwaki, M.H.; Fungaro, M.H.P. Molecular analysis of Aspergillus section Nigri isolated from onion samples reveals the prevalence of A. welwitschiae. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2021, 52, 387–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Jing, R.; Yang, W.-H.; Xiao, M.; Li, Y.; Zou, G.-L.; Wang, C.-Y.; Li, X.-W.; Xu, Y.-C.; Hsueh, P.-R. Species identification and antifungal susceptibility testing of Aspergillus strains isolated from patients with otomycosis in northern China. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2021, 55, 282–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Zoran, T.; Sartori, B.; Sappl, L.; Aigner, M.; Sánchez-Reus, F.; Rezusta, A.; Chowdhary, A.; Taj-Aldeen, S.J.; Arendrup, M.C.; Oliveri, S. Azole-resistance in Aspergillus terreus and related species: An emerging problem or a rare phenomenon? Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rivero-Menendez, O.; Soto-Debran, J.C.; Medina, N.; Lucio, J.; Mellado, E.; Alastruey-Izquierdo, A. Molecular identification, antifungal susceptibility testing, and mechanisms of azole resistance in Aspergillus species received within a surveillance program on antifungal resistance in Spain. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 63, e00865-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Nash, A.; Rhodes, J. Simulations of CYP51A from Aspergillus fumigatus in a model bilayer provide insights into triazole drug resistance. Med. Mycol. 2018, 56, 361–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Camps, S.M.; Rijs, A.J.; Klaassen, C.H.; Meis, J.F.; O’Gorman, C.M.; Dyer, P.S.; Melchers, W.J.; Verweij, P.E. Molecular epidemiology of Aspergillus fumigatus isolates harboring the TR34/L98H azole resistance mechanism. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012, 50, 2674–2680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Chowdhary, A.; Kathuria, S.; Xu, J.; Sharma, C.; Sundar, G.; Singh, P.K.; Gaur, S.N.; Hagen, F.; Klaassen, C.H.; Meis, J.F. Clonal expansion and emergence of environmental multiple-triazole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus strains carrying the TR34/L98H mutations in the cyp 51A gene in India. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e52871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Astvad, K.; Jensen, R.; Hassan, T.; Mathiasen, E.; Thomsen, G.; Pedersen, U.; Christensen, M.; Hilberg, O.; Arendrup, M. First detection of TR46/Y121F/T289A and TR34/L98H alterations in Aspergillus fumigatus isolates from azole-naive patients in Denmark despite negative findings in the environment. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 5096–5101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Ahmad, S.; Khan, Z.; Hagen, F.; Meis, J.F. Occurrence of triazole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus with TR34/L98H mutations in outdoor and hospital environment in Kuwait. Environ. Res. 2014, 133, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Van Ingen, J.; Van der Lee, H.A.; Rijs, T.A.; Zoll, J.; Leenstra, T.; Melchers, W.J.; Verweij, P.E. Azole, polyene and echinocandin MIC distributions for wild-type, TR34/L98H and TR46/Y121F/T289A Aspergillus fumigatus isolates in the Netherlands. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2015, 70, 178–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Chowdhary, A.; Sharma, C.; Kathuria, S.; Hagen, F.; Meis, J.F. Prevalence and mechanism of triazole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus in a referral chest hospital in Delhi, India and an update of the situation in Asia. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Nabili, M.; Shokohi, T.; Moazeni, M.; Khodavaisy, S.; Aliyali, M.; Badiee, P.; Zarrinfar, H.; Hagen, F.; Badali, H. High prevalence of clinical and environmental triazole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus in Iran: Is it a challenging issue? J. Med. Microbiol. 2016, 65, 468–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wiederhold, N.P.; Gil, V.G.; Gutierrez, F.; Lindner, J.R.; Albataineh, M.T.; McCarthy, D.I.; Sanders, C.; Fan, H.; Fothergill, A.W.; Sutton, D.A. First Detection of TR34 L98H and TR46 Y121F T289A Cyp51 Mutations in Aspergillus fumigatus Isolates in the United States. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2016, 54, 168–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Mohammadi, F.; Hashemi, S.J.; Zoll, J.; Melchers, W.J.; Rafati, H.; Dehghan, P.; Rezaie, S.; Tolooe, A.; Tamadon, Y.; van der Lee, H.A.; et al. Quantitative Analysis of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism for Rapid Detection of TR34/L98H- and TR46/Y121F/T289A-Positive Aspergillus fumigatus Isolates Obtained from Patients in Iran from 2010 to 2014. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 387–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Hurst, S.F.; Berkow, E.L.; Stevenson, K.L.; Litvintseva, A.P.; Lockhart, S.R. Isolation of azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus from the environment in the south-eastern USA. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2017, 72, 2443–2446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Deng, S.; Zhang, L.; Ji, Y.; Verweij, P.E.; Tsui, K.M.; Hagen, F.; Houbraken, J.; Meis, J.F.; Abliz, P.; Wang, X. Triazole phenotypes and genotypic characterization of clinical Aspergillus fumigatus isolates in China. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2017, 6, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Chen, Y.; Li, Z.; Han, X.; Tian, S.; Zhao, J.; Chen, F.; Su, X.; Zhao, J.; Zou, Z.; Gong, Y. Elevated MIC values of imidazole drugs against Aspergillus fumigatus isolates with TR34/L98H/S297T/F495I mutation. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e01549-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Morio, F.; Dannaoui, E.; Chouaki, T.; Cateau, E.; Malard, O.; Bonfils, P.; Page, C.; Dufour, X.; Cottrel, C.; Erwan, T. PCR-based detection of Aspergillus fumigatus and absence of azole resistance due to TR 34/L98H in a french multicenter cohort of 137 patients with fungal rhinosinusitis. Mycoses 2018, 61, 30–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Paluch, M.; Lejeune, S.; Hecquet, E.; Prévotat, A.; Deschildre, A.; Fréalle, E. High airborne level of Aspergillus fumigatus and presence of azole-resistant TR34/L98H isolates in the home of a cystic fibrosis patient harbouring chronic colonisation with azole-resistant H285Y A. fumigatus. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2019, 18, 364–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Tsuchido, Y.; Tanaka, M.; Nakano, S.; Yamamoto, M.; Matsumura, Y.; Nagao, M. Prospective multicenter surveillance of clinically isolated Aspergillus species revealed azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus isolates with TR34/L98H mutation in the Kyoto and Shiga regions of Japan. Med. Mycol. 2019, 57, 997–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Pontes, L.; Beraquet, C.A.G.; Arai, T.; Pigolli, G.L.; Lyra, L.; Watanabe, A.; Moretti, M.L.; Schreiber, A.Z. Aspergillus fumigatus Clinical Isolates Carrying CYP51A with TR34/L98H/S297T/F495I Substitutions Detected after Four-Year Retrospective Azole Resistance Screening in Brazil. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e02059-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Zhang, J.; Zoll, J.; Engel, T.; van den Heuvel, J.; Verweij, P.E.; Debets, A.J. The Medical Triazole Voriconazole Can Select for Tandem Repeat Variations in Azole-Resistant Aspergillus Fumigatus Harboring TR34/L98H via Asexual Reproduction. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The steps of project implementation, from sample collection to WGS. The estimated time to complete each of the key stages of the project indicates that after the sampling phase, which spans a period of one year, within two months, it is possible to analyze azole-resistant Aspergillus spp. through whole genome sequencing to identify all SNPs in the entire genomic content.
Figure 1. The steps of project implementation, from sample collection to WGS. The estimated time to complete each of the key stages of the project indicates that after the sampling phase, which spans a period of one year, within two months, it is possible to analyze azole-resistant Aspergillus spp. through whole genome sequencing to identify all SNPs in the entire genomic content.
Jof 08 01091 g001
Figure 2. (A) The distribution of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of different Aspergillus isolates against tested triazoles compared to epidemilogical Cutoff values (ECVs). (B) The MICs of different Aspergillus isolates without defined ECV against tested triazoles.
Figure 2. (A) The distribution of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of different Aspergillus isolates against tested triazoles compared to epidemilogical Cutoff values (ECVs). (B) The MICs of different Aspergillus isolates without defined ECV against tested triazoles.
Jof 08 01091 g002
Figure 3. Homology modeling of CYP51A of the selected Aspergillus species and mutation mapping on the structures. Each structure was shown in two different presentations. (A) (A. terreus), (B) (A. tubingensis), (C) (A. niger) (D) (A. fumigatus).
Figure 3. Homology modeling of CYP51A of the selected Aspergillus species and mutation mapping on the structures. Each structure was shown in two different presentations. (A) (A. terreus), (B) (A. tubingensis), (C) (A. niger) (D) (A. fumigatus).
Jof 08 01091 g003
Table 1. The clinical source and accession number of isolates.
Table 1. The clinical source and accession number of isolates.
Sample CodeSpeciesSectionAccession Number
(benA Gene)
Origin
AFA. fumigatusFumigatiMH208797Patients with ABPA
ANA. nigerNigriMH208734Nail (Onychomycosis)
AWA. welwitschiaeNigriMH208730Sputum (asthmatic patient)
AT1A. tubingensisNigriMH208733BAL (Patient with probable IA)
AT2A. tubingensisNigriMH208779Nail (Onychomycosis)
AR1A. terreusTerriMH208803Sputum (asthmatic patient)
AR2A. terreusTerriMH208818BAL (Patient with probable IA)
BAL: Broncho alveolar lavage fluid, IA: invasive aspergillosis, ABPA: Allergic Bronchopulmonary aspergillosis.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nargesi, S.; Valadan, R.; Abastabar, M.; Kaboli, S.; Thekkiniath, J.; Hedayati, M.T. A Whole Genome Sequencing-Based Approach to Track down Genomic Variants in Itraconazole-Resistant Species of Aspergillus from Iran. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 1091. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8101091

AMA Style

Nargesi S, Valadan R, Abastabar M, Kaboli S, Thekkiniath J, Hedayati MT. A Whole Genome Sequencing-Based Approach to Track down Genomic Variants in Itraconazole-Resistant Species of Aspergillus from Iran. Journal of Fungi. 2022; 8(10):1091. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8101091

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nargesi, Sanaz, Reza Valadan, Mahdi Abastabar, Saeed Kaboli, Jose Thekkiniath, and Mohammad Taghi Hedayati. 2022. "A Whole Genome Sequencing-Based Approach to Track down Genomic Variants in Itraconazole-Resistant Species of Aspergillus from Iran" Journal of Fungi 8, no. 10: 1091. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8101091

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop