Next Article in Journal
Virtual Reference Services through Web Search Engines: Study of Academic Libraries in Pakistan
Next Article in Special Issue
Transitioning from a Conventional to a ‘Mega’ Journal: A Bibliometric Case Study of the Journal Medicine
Previous Article in Journal
“Second Language Writing” Publications in Web of Science: A Bibliometric Analysis
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Publications 2017, 5(1), 5; doi:10.3390/publications5010005

Accountability and High Impact Journals in the Health Sciences

Department of Physiology, Medical Sciences Building, 1 King’s College Circle, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
Academic Editors: Barbara Meyers Ford and Jason Wilde
Received: 8 December 2016 / Accepted: 9 March 2017 / Published: 13 March 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Alternative Publication Metrics)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1240 KB, uploaded 14 March 2017]   |  

Abstract

As the requirement for accountability and demonstration of the impact of public and privately funded research increases, the practice of attributing impact to research published in high impact journals is on the rise. To investigate the relevance of existing bibliometrics laws to current health research practices, 57 research areas in Web of Science (WoS) representing the major and minor disciplines were studied. In the majority of cases, Garfield’s Law of Concentration is followed with 20% of journals in each area contributing 80% of the total citations. The major multidisciplinary journals formed an anomalous grouping with low overall citation rates, although those documents cited were at a level well above the norm. In all research areas studied, team science is the prevailing norm, single author publications were rarely present in the data sets. For researchers looking to maximize the uptake and recognition of their work, publication in the top journals in the appropriate research area would be the most effective strategy, which does not in many cases include the major multidisciplinary journals. View Full-Text
Keywords: evaluation; health-sciences research; bibliometrics evaluation; health-sciences research; bibliometrics
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Buchan, A.M.J. Accountability and High Impact Journals in the Health Sciences. Publications 2017, 5, 5.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Publications EISSN 2304-6775 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top