Open AccessThis article is
- freely available
A Novel Rubric for Rating the Quality of Retraction Notices
School for Science and Math at Vanderbilt, C-1320 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
These authors contributed equally to this work.
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 21 November 2013; in revised form: 15 January 2014 / Accepted: 20 January 2014 / Published: 24 January 2014
Abstract: When a scientific article is found to be either fraudulent or erroneous, one course of action available to both the authors and the publisher is to retract said article. Unfortunately, not all retraction notices properly inform the reader of the problems with a retracted article. This study developed a novel rubric for rating and standardizing the quality of retraction notices, and used it to assess the retraction notices of 171 retracted articles from 15 journals. Results suggest the rubric to be a robust, if preliminary, tool. Analysis of the retraction notices suggest that their quality has not improved over the last 50 years, that it varies both between and within journals, and that it is dependent on the field of science, the author of the retraction notice, and the reason for retraction. These results indicate a lack of uniformity in the retraction policies of individual journals and throughout the scientific literature. The rubric presented in this study could be adopted by journals to help standardize the writing of retraction notices.
Keywords: research ethics; scientific retraction; research misconduct
Citations to this Article
Cite This Article
MDPI and ACS Style
Bilbrey, E.; O'Dell, N.; Creamer, J. A Novel Rubric for Rating the Quality of Retraction Notices. Publications 2014, 2, 14-26.
Bilbrey E, O'Dell N, Creamer J. A Novel Rubric for Rating the Quality of Retraction Notices. Publications. 2014; 2(1):14-26.
Bilbrey, Emma; O'Dell, Natalie; Creamer, Jonathan. 2014. "A Novel Rubric for Rating the Quality of Retraction Notices." Publications 2, no. 1: 14-26.