Open AccessThis article is
- freely available
Publications 2013, 1(3), 113-139; doi:10.3390/publications1030113
The Open Access Divide
School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University, 755 W. Michigan St, UL 3100B, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
Received: 29 August 2013; in revised form: 9 October 2013 / Accepted: 12 October 2013 / Published: 17 October 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Open Access - A Review after 10 Years)
Download PDF Full-Text [322 KB, Updated Version, uploaded 18 October 2013 17:16 CEST]
The original version is still available [355 KB, uploaded 17 October 2013 16:27 CEST]
Abstract: This paper is an attempt to review various aspects of the open access divide regarding the difference between those academics who support free sharing of data and scholarly output and those academics who do not. It provides a structured description by adopting the Ws doctrines emphasizing such questions as who, what, when, where and why for information-gathering. Using measurable variables to define a common expression of the open access divide, this study collects aggregated data from existing open access as well as non-open access publications including journal articles and extensive reports. The definition of the open access divide is integrated into the discussion of scholarship on a larger scale.
Keywords: scholarly information sharing; self-archiving; data; publications; open access
Article StatisticsClick here to load and display the download statistics.
Notes: Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
MDPI and ACS Style
Xia, J. The Open Access Divide. Publications 2013, 1, 113-139.AMA Style
Xia J. The Open Access Divide. Publications. 2013; 1(3):113-139.Chicago/Turabian Style
Xia, Jingfeng. 2013. "The Open Access Divide." Publications 1, no. 3: 113-139.