Next Article in Journal
Photooxidative Dehydrogenation of Chiral Ir (III) Amino Acid Complexes Based on [Λ-Ir(ppy)2(MeCN)2](PF6)
Previous Article in Journal
A Computational Perspective on Carbon-Carbon Bond Formation by Single Cu Atom on Pd(111) Surface for CO Electrochemical Reduction
Previous Article in Special Issue
Electrodeposited PPy@TiO2 and PEDOT@TiO2 Counter Electrodes for [Co(bpy)3]2+/3+ Redox Mediator-Based Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Inorganics
Volume 11
Issue 10
10.3390/inorganics11100379
inorganics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis of a New Dinuclear Cu(I) Complex with a Triazine Ligand and Diphenylphosphine Methane: X-ray Structure, Optical Properties, DFT Calculations, and Application in DSSCs

by
Carlos A. Peñuelas
1,
José J. Campos-Gaxiola
1,*,
Rody Soto-Rojo
1,
Adriana Cruz-Enríquez
1,
Edgar A. Reynoso-Soto
2,
Valentín Miranda-Soto
2,
Juventino J. García
3,
Marcos Flores-Álamo
3,
Jesús Baldenebro-López
1 and
Daniel Glossman-Mitnik
4
1
Facultad de Ingeniería Mochis, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Fuente de Poseidón y Prol. A. Flores S/N, C.U., Los Mochis C.P. 81223, Mexico
2
Centro de Graduados e Investigación en Química, Instituto Tecnológico de Tijuana, Tecnológico Nacional de México, Apartado Postal 1166, Tijuana C.P. 22000, Mexico
3
Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cto. Exterior S/N, C.U., Ciudad de México C.P. 04510, Mexico
4
Centro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados, S. C., Miguel de Cervantes 120, Complejo Industrial Chihuahua, Chihuahua C.P. 31136, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Inorganics 2023, 11(10), 379; https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11100379
Submission received: 31 August 2023 / Revised: 17 September 2023 / Accepted: 21 September 2023 / Published: 25 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Collection Coordination Complexes for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells (DSCs))
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A new copper(I) complex, [Cu2(L)2dppm](PF6)2 (1) [L = 3-(2-Pyridyl)-5,6-diphenyl-1,2,4-triazine and dppm: Bis(diphenylphosphino)methane], was prepared and characterized by IR, 1H-NMR, 31P-NMR spectroscopy, elemental and thermogravimetric analysis, and a single-crystal X-ray diffraction technique. Complex 1 is a dinuclear compound, showing that L and dppm act as tridentate and bidentate chelating ligands, respectively. The two Cu(I) atoms exhibit a distorted tetrahedral coordination sphere embedded in N3P environments. The supramolecular interactions in the solid-state structure are characterized by C−H···N, C−H···F, C-H···π and π···π intermolecular interactions, which we studied using Hirshfeld surface and fingerprint tools. Additionally, the complex was studied experimentally using UV–Vis spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry, and theoretical studies with time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) were performed. Moreover, the optical and electrochemical properties were studied, focusing on the band gap. Compound 1 was used as a co-sensitizer in a dye-sensitized solar cell, showing a good photovoltaic performance of 2.03% (Jsc = 5.095 mAcm−2, Voc = 757 mV, and FF = 52.7%) under 100 mW cm−2 (AM 1.5G) solar irradiation, which is similar to that of DSSC, which was only sensitized by N719 (2.2%) under the same condition.

1. Introduction

With the acceleration of industrialization, the demand for energy in today’s society is increasing. Energy production has been largely based on fossil fuels, generating large quantities of carbon dioxide and being non-renewable. This pollution globally threatens the future of the planet [1,2]. Regarding energy and environmental issues, solar energy-to-electricity transformation technologies (photovoltaics) represent the priority alternative for green energy, triggering a speedy development of research within this area [3,4]. Photovoltaic systems are a relevant option since sunlight is the most abundant renewable resource [5,6], and photovoltaic devices can easily be integrated into buildings, providing high conversion efficiencies. In photovoltaic technology, of particular relevance are dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs), reported by Grätzel and O’Regan in 1991 [7]. There are two types of these devices based on a sensitizer: organic dyes (purely organic compound) [8] and inorganic dyes (organometallic or coordination complex [9,10]. The compounds in DSSCs are in charge of light capture and the transfer of electrons into the conduction band (CB) of a semiconductor device (typically TiO2), by which these compounds are supported [11]. The efficiency of the solar device also depends on the redox system, the electrolyte, and the corresponding dye properties [12]. Metal complexes possess some advantages over organic photosensitizers, and they usually exhibit higher stability. In this context, ruthenium (II) complexes such as N719 and N3 deserve particular attention due to their properties and possible applications [13,14]. Much effort has been dedicated to searching for materials to improve DSSCs’ overall efficiency [15,16]. Recent record efficiencies of over 11.9–20% [17,18] were documented using dye N719, which is usually used as a reference in the arena of dyes for DSSCs.
Nevertheless, using ruthenium compounds as photosensitizers might have been a disadvantage due to the low abundance of this metal on the Earth’s crust (ca. 0.001 ppm) [19] and the fact it is expensive, raising concerns about the technology’s sustainability and commercial viability. Consequently, several researchers directed their efforts to the search for photosensitizers based on other metal centers, which would be of lower cost [19,20]. The use of cheaper and low-toxicity metals, namely copper or zinc, as replacements for the abovementioned expensive ruthenium(II) complexes has incentivized research in this area [10].
Since copper is an abundant element (ca. 50 ppm) [19], copper(I) centers possess a d10 electron configuration and a favored tetracoordinate geometry [21]. Complexes with two ligands containing 2,2′-bipyridine or 1,10-phenanthroline metal-binding domains include similar photophysical properties to those of ruthenium(II) sensitizers. These properties triggered the use of Cu(I) compounds as suitable materials for DSSCs, e.g., as hole-transporting materials (HTM) [22], additives [23], and dyes [24].
Sauvage synthesized a series of homoleptic copper(I) complexes [25] of the type [Cu(N^N)2]+ with bpy ligands containing carboxylic acids as anchoring groups as well as dyes containing big band-gap semiconductors (TiO2 and ZnO) useful for DSSCs. He reported a PCE that corresponds to 23.7%, relative to a device regarding ruthenium(II) dye N719. Since, relevant improvements has been made in the development of homoleptic compounds of the type [Cu(N^N)2]+ and heteroleptic [Cu(N^N)(N^N)′]+ or [Cu(N^N)(P^P)]+ sensitizers (N^N = diimine chelating ligand; P^P = diphosphines chelating ligand) in dye-sensitized solar cells [26,27,28].
Our research groups reported previous theoretical and experimental studies of the photophysical and electrochemical properties of Cu(I) compounds containing tri-phenylphosphine (PPh3) as a bulky P-donor ligand along with cis-(±)-2,4,5-tris(2-pyridyl)imidazoline or 2,4,6-tris(2-pyridyl)triazine or pyridine-2,5-dicarboxylic acid as the anchoring ligand. We documented their performance as co-sensitizers in DSSCs, achieving an FF ranging from 27.9% to 57.9%, an efficiency of 0.50–2.92%, and an ηrel to N719 of 30.5–63.6% [29,30]. Optical and electrochemical studies suggest that co-adsorbents can be employed to capture light in the low-wavelength region of the visible region, overcoming the competition of light absorption by I−/I3−, reducing charge recombination, and increasing electron lifetime. Furthermore, these materials possess moderate adsorption in the low-wavelength region (300–450 nm) and are easier to produce in good yields, reducing the price of Ru-based dyes. Therefore, they are vital materials to be used as co-sensitizers for DSSCs, assisting in the fabrication of new DSSCs with significantly low cost and a higher availability of the Earth-abundant copper-based precursors. In this paper, we document the molecular and crystal structures of one new dinuclear complex of composition [Cu2(L)2dppm](PF6)2 (1) [L = 3-(2-Pyridyl)-5,6 di phe-nyl-1,2,4-triazine and dppm: Bis(diphenylphosphino)methane] (see Scheme 1). The compound exhibits relevant optical and electrochemical properties, assessed in solution by UV–Vis spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry, and further studied by quantum chemical calculations. In addition, their efficiency as co-sensitizers in DSSCs was also assessed.

2. Results and Discussion

A combination of 3-(2-Pyridyl)-5,6-diphenyl-1,2,4-triazine (L) and Bis(diphenylphosphino)methane (dppm) with Cu(MeCN)4PF6 provided a dinuclear Cu(I) complex of composition [Cu2(L)2dppm](PF6)2 (1) (see Supplementary Material). The phosphine ligands were relevant in stabilizing the molecular structure [31]. The compound was characterized by elemental analysis; IR, 1H NMR, 31P{1H} NMR (Figures S1–S3 in Supplementary Materials) and UV–Vis spectroscopy; thermogravimetric analysis (TGA); and single-crystal X-ray diffraction (scXRD) determinations. Additionally, the electrochemical properties of the compound were assessed with cyclovoltammetry.

2.1. IR and NMR Analysis

The infrared (IR) spectrum of the title compound is in good agreement with the results of the X-ray structure analyses. The spectrum exhibits characteristic C-H stretching vibrations of the aromatic rings in the range of 3055–3050 cm−1, and the stretching vibrations of the C=Nimino groups are C=Ntriazine 1600 cm−1 and C=Npy 1511 cm−1, which are shifted to higher frequencies (~15 cm−1) in comparison with free L due to the formation of the N→Cu bond (see Table 1 and Figure S1). The signal for the C=C stretching bands of the pyridyl and phenyl groups appear at 1481–1436 cm−1. The band around 1436 cm−1 is typical for the P-CAr vibration of the phosphine ligand, and other bands in the 1000 and 500 cm−1 regions are attributed to out-of-plane bending modes for the C-H, C-C, and C-N bonds. Complex 1 also exhibits a band corresponding to the asymmetric stretching vibration of the PF6¯ group at 838 cm−1 [32,33,34].
The 1H NMR study of the title complex (Figure S2, Supplementary Material) displays broadened signals for both coordinated L and dppm. The spectrum shows five signals at 8.80–7.31 ppm (48 H) assigned to the L and dppm ligands. The aliphatic hydrogens in the dppm were assigned at 3.93 ppm as a triplet (2H). The 31P NMR spectrum of the compound showed a broadened signal close to −7.42 ppm (see Figure S3), which was assigned to the dppm, in addition to a septet at −144.67 ppm arising from the PF6¯ anion [30,31,33].

2.2. X-ray Crystallography

Complex 1 was also characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. The molecular structure with atom labeling is represented in Figure 1. A few selected bond lengths and angles are included in Table 2. The corresponding hydrogen bonding geometries can be found in Table S1 (see Supplementary Material).
The crystallographic study revealed that [Cu2(L)2dppm](PF6)2 (1) crystallized in the monoclinic crystal system with space group P21/c. The asymmetric unit contains two copper(I) atoms as metal centers, two L ligands, one dppm molecule, and two PF6 ¯ anions. The central Cu(I) ions are embedded in a four-coordinate CuN3P environment, resulting from coordination by the auxiliary phosphine ligand and triazine L ligands, which adopts the k3-N,N,N-tridentate chelate bonding mode of binding via the pyridyl nitrogen and two nitrogen atoms from the triazine group. Thus, two five-membered Cu-N-C-C-N chelate rings, one six-membered Cu-N-N-Cu-N-N chelate ring, and one seven-membered Cu-N-N-Cu-P-C-P chelate ring are observed in the molecular structure (see Figure S4) with Cu-N and Cu-P bond lengths in the range of 2.0160(3)–2.1360(3) Å and 2.1831(11)–2.2102(11) Å, respectively (Table 2). The bond angles at Cu(I) vary from 77.67(12) to 130.45(10)°, with the smallest value corresponding to the N-Cu-N angle in the five-membered chelate rings formed in the title compound. The angle [N(5)-Cu(2)-P(2)] was the largest due to the sterically demanding dppm ligand chelate ring. A comparison of the bite angle (N-Cu-N) of the triazine ligands with the bond angle calculated (M06/6-31G(d)+DZVP level) agrees well for Cu(1) and Cu(2) ions (see Table 2).
The main distortion of the tetrahedral geometry originates from the small N(1)-Cu(1)-N(4) and N(6)-Cu(2)-N(8) bite angles of the chelating triazine ligands [77.67(12)° and 79.00(13)°, respectively]. The distortion of the tetrahedral geometry around the Cu(I) centers can also be seen from the dihedral angle formed between the two five-membered chelate rings at 74.18° (Figure 1). The coordination geometry is best described as distorted trigonal pyramidal, as indicated by the τ4-values of 0.74 for Cu(1) and 0.77 for Cu(2) [35]. The geometries are similar to those reported previously for [Cu2(N^N)2(dppm)2](BF4)2 (N^N=2-(2-tert-butyl-tetrazol-5-yl)pyridine) [36], [{Cu(pypzH)}2(μ-dppm)2](ClO4)2 (pypzH=3-(2′-pyridyl)pyrazole) [37] and [Cu(N^N)(PPh3)2]NO3 (N^N = 5,6-diphenyl-3-pyridin-2-yl-[1,2,4]triazine) [38]. In 1, the intramolecular Cu(1)···Cu(2) distance is 3.217 Å; this value is longer than the sum of van der Waals radii of Cu (2.8 Å), which does not favor metal–metal interaction. In this complex, two face-to-face intramolecular π-stacking interactions stabilize the structure further (Figure S5). The first π-contact is within one dppm ligand (angle between ring planes = 12.4°, centroid···ring plane = 3.62 Å, distance between ring centroids = 3.68 Å). The second is between the phenyl ring of the dppm ligand and the pyridine ring (angle between ring planes = 16.1°, centroid···ring plane = 3.69 Å, distance between ring centroids = 3.80 Å) [39,40].
A detailed analysis of the single-crystal structure of the complex reveals a 3D hydrogen bond array, where two different dimeric units are formed through C-H···π and π···π contacts [39,41] between two [Cu2(L)2dppm]+ cations (Figures S6 and S7). A series of additional C−H···N, C-H···F, C-H···π and π···π interactions between the components of the complex further stabilized the system. The details of these supramolecular interactions are summarized in Table S1. All distances and angles are in agreement with the data found for previously reported structures [29,30,33,42,43].

2.3. Hirshfeld Surface Analysis

Hirshfeld surface analysis detects different intermolecular interactions in crystal packing [44,45]. For this purpose, the CIF file was used to generate the Hirshfeld surfaces and fingerprint plots employing the CrystalExplorer program. The red–blue–white color scheme is utilized for quantifying the intermolecular interactions and provides a resource to analyze the zones of strong donor–acceptor interactions [44]. The Hirshfeld surface of the title complex is mapped over the dnorm (0.5 to 1.5), curvedness, and shape index (Figure 2). These reports point out the corresponding distances to the closest atom inside the surface (di) and to the closest atom outside the surface (de). The differences reveal alterations in the packing of the structures. Intermolecular π···π interactions between neighboring molecules in the structures of molecular crystals give rise to patches in the curvedness map [46]. The curvedness plots (−4.0 to +4.0) of the complex show only slightly flattened surface patches above either side of the aromatic rings from the L ligand, indicating that the π···π contacts are relatively weak and are significantly face-to-face displaced (Figure 2b). Maps of the shape index are more sensitive to subtle changes in the electron density surrounding the molecules [45,46]. The shape index curve exhibits a complementary red (pit)—blue (bump) color that corresponds to the negative and positive surface property value, respectively, with the former representing the location of an acceptor atom and the latter pointing towards a donor atom and being involved in C−H···N, C-H···F, C-H···π and π···π interactions, in agreement with the observations in the scXRD section (Figure 2c).
The dominant interactions observed in complex 1 are H···H (55.4%), H···C (19%), H···F (18%), and C···F (%), which appear as red spots on the dnorm surface in Figure 2a.
Furthermore, the intermolecular interactions in the complex are represented in the 2D plots shown in Figure 3 and Figure S8, respectively. The fingerprints around 1.6–1.8 (di, de) vary from a blue tone to a slightly green color associated with the C∙∙∙C contacts from π∙∙∙π interactions [47,48]. The H···F/F···H and H···N/N···H interactions appear as distinct spikes in the fingerprint plot and comprise 18% and 1.5%, respectively, of the total Hirshfeld surface for complex 1 (Figure 3 and Figure S8). The more dispersed zones in the blue color correspond mainly to H∙∙∙H (55.4%) van der Waals contacts. The significant contribution of H···H contacts indicates that aside from the hydrogen bonding interactions, van der Waals contacts are relevant for the molecular packing of the components in the crystal structure.

2.4. Analysis by DFT and UV–Vis

The complex’s molecular structures and electronic properties are calculated by DFT [49,50] and TD-DFT methods [51,52]. The calculations were carried out using the M06 hybrid-meta-GGA function in combination with the base sets 6–31G(d) (for C, H, N, and P atoms) and DZVP (Cu atom) with an IEF-PCM in ethanol [53,54,55]. X-ray crystallographic analysis determined the ground-state geometries from the experimental structure. Notably, the deviations between the simulated molecular structure in solution and the solid-state structure are less than 0.097 Å and 6.52°, respectively (see Table 2).
It is well known that frontier molecular orbital analysis is a potential tool for studying the molecular electronic charge mobility, chemical reactivity, kinetic stability of molecules, and electronic transitions in molecules. The energy difference between the HOMO and LUMO is an important parameter in establishing the photophysical and electrical properties of organic and inorganic materials [29,30,33].
Since the key absorption processes are HOMO→LUMO transitions, it is important to establish the corresponding separate states of charge with the HOMO located in a donor moiety and the LUMO in an acceptor unit. Thus, the isodensity plots of the frontier molecular orbitals (FMOs) for the asymmetric unit of [Cu2(L)2dppm]2+ at the M06/6-31G(d) + DZVP level of theory of calculation show charge transfer (HOMO→LUMO) over the entire π-system of the compound and the copper metal center. The energy of the highest occupied molecular orbital (EHOMO) is −6.656 eV, and the energy of the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (ELUMO) is −3.034 eV, giving ∆E(LUMO-HOMO) = 3.623 eV (Figure 4). As shown in Figure 4 and Figure S9, the HOMO orbital is mainly concentrated in the copper metal centers and the two P-atoms, while the LUMO electron density is mainly distributed in the L ligands. Furthermore, Figure S7 shows that HOMO—4, HOMO—5, and HOMO—6 orbitals are distributed over the L and dppm ligands, while LUMO + 1 and LUMO + orbitals are distributed only in the triazine ligands. The HOMO and LUMO energy levels of [Cu2(L)2dppm]2+ are shown in Figure 4. We found that the energy levels of the compound are appropriate for the DSSC system containing TiO2 because the LUMO levels lay above the conduction band of the TiO2 semiconductor (−4.40 eV). Therefore, there is an efficient electron donation, and the HOMO energy levels lay below that of the I−/I3 − redox electrolyte (−4.60 eV), which can be improved (about −0.3 V) by adding 4-tert-butyl pyridine (TBP) to the I−/I3− redox electrolyte, contributing to dye regeneration [56,57].
Finally, Figure 4 shows that the LUMO was delocalized in the entire chromophore (L ligands), which might enhance the electron coupling with TiO2 and the electron extraction pathways.
The experimental and calculated UV–Vis absorption spectra of the title compound are shown in Figure 5. The experimental spectrum was measured from a 2.0 × 10−5 M solution in EtOH at room temperature. The oscillator strength (f) is a parameter that quantifies the probability of electron transitions and is calculated based on the TD-DFT/M06/6-31G(d) + DZVP level of theory. The results of the TD-DFT calculation indicate three major transitions for complex [Cu2(L)2dppm]2+ (Figure 5 and Figure S10; Table 3, of which the most intense band at 446 nm (f = 0.0922) is due to the HOMO→LUMO transition having an MLCT/XLCT/LLCT character. This excitation is consistent with the experimental spectrum’s broad band centered at 410 nm (ε = 13,150 M−1 cm−1, see Figure 5 and Table 3).
The calculated spectrum displays two additional bands at 363 nm (f = 0.0565) and 359 nm (f = 0.0449), which are assigned to HOMO-3→LUMO+3/HOMO-6→LUMO and HOMO-10→LUMO/HOMO-6→LUMO transitions, respectively. These transitions imply that intramolecular charge transfer takes place [29,30,58]; the band at 363 nm can be related to the broad experimental absorption band found at 338 nm (ε = 26,700 M−1 cm−1, Figure 5 and Figure S10) and has an LLCT character. The experimental band centered at 286 nm (ε = 56,700 M−1 cm−1) was assigned to π→π* transitions, having an LLCT character. A detailed assignment of the TD-DFT calculations in terms of FMOs is included in Table 4.

2.5. Electrochemical Properties

The electrochemical properties of the dinuclear complex were assessed at 298 K for solutions in acetonitrile by cyclic voltammetry (CV), using 0.1 M of tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate (NBu4PF6) as a supporting electrolyte. The analyzed data are found in Table 4, and the CV is shown in Figure S11. The complex showed irreversible oxidation and reduction waves. The first oxidation (Epa = 0.97 V) corresponds to the Cu(I)/Cu(II) redox couple with a significant P^P character, indicating stronger structural rigidity [30,59]. The compound shows a second irreversible oxidation wave (Eox = 1.15 V) assigned to the oxidation of the second copper center, revealing the expected electronic communication between the two metals [59]. The oxidation potential (+0.97 V and +1.15 V) is within the range reported for copper(I)-pyridyl complexes [29,30,59,60]. The first reduction event (Ered1 = −0.81 V) is centered on the pyridine ring of the L ligand; a second reduction wave at −1.96 V is assigned to a second reduction of the L ligand [30,59]. Based on the reduction potentials, the HOMO and LUMO energy levels were calculated using Equation (1) [61,62]:
EHOMO (or ELUMO) = −4.8 − [(Epeak potential − E1/2 (ferrocene)]
where Epeak potential corresponds to the maximum and minimum peak potential and E1/2 is the half-wave potential of ferrocene (0.42 V), which was used as a reference. The resulting value for the HOMO orbital (−5.53 eV) agrees with the values obtained by the DFT calculations, with −6.65 eV. Due to the irreversibility of the redox process, it was not possible to obtain a good approach for the LUMO value.
The HOMO and LUMO energy levels in complex 1, estimated from cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements, are −5.53 and −2.77 eV, respectively. They are consistent with the DFT results in that the energy levels of the synthesized compound are suitable for electron injection and dye regeneration thermodynamically (see Scheme S1).

2.6. TGA Analysis

To investigate the thermal behavior of 1, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed over the temperature range of 30–800 °C under an N2 atmosphere for a crystalline sample with a heating rate of 20 °C min−1 (see Figure 6). The TGA graph indicates the first weight loss (found, 10.0%; theoretical, 10.2%), in the 300−350 °C range, attributed to the loss of one PF6 ion. The second step in the temperature range of 350 to 450 °C corresponds to the loss of two L ligands, one dppm molecule, and one PF6 ion. The observed weight loss of 80.3% agrees with the calculated value (80.9%). The residual framework starts to decompose beyond 450 °C with a series of complicated weight losses and does not stop until heating ends at 800 °C.

2.7. Application in DSSCs

When the crystal structure of the complex is considered, it is found that structural rigidity and molecular packing are critical factors for electrochemical properties because they facilitate electronic transfer [56]. In the complex, the center Cu(I) metal chelates with two N electron donors of the L ligand and forms two five-membered Cu-N-C-C-N chelate rings, which are adjacent to the triazine and benzene rings (see Figure S4). The five-membered chelate ring, triazine ring, and benzene ring are almost coplanar; thereby, the rigidity of the molecular structure is increased. Furthermore, complex 1 extends as supermolecules through C−H···N, C-H···F, C-H···π and π···π interactions (see Figures S6 and S7, and Hirshfeld surface analysis), which make the electron-donating ability of the title complex better when they are used in DSSCs as a co-sensitizer.
In addition, UV–Vis absorption spectra of ligand L, complex 1, and N719 were measured in ethanol at room temperature (Figure S10). The complex showed a metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) absorption band between 350 and 550 nm. Compared to the commercially available N719 ruthenium complex, which absorbs in the 330 to 600 nm range [63], the complex could achieve absorption at a low wavelength when used as a co-sensitizer in DSSCs. A higher molar extinction coefficient at 338 nm (ε = 26,700 M−1 cm−1) indicates that complex 1 possesses a higher light-harvesting ability in this wavelength region compared with N719 and I3− (25,000 M−1 cm−1) [56]. Hence, it can be predicted that the photon lost due to the light absorption by I3− will be suppressed by using 1 as a co-sensitizer and co-adsorbent due to the competition between 1 and I3− to absorb light. To evidence this hypothesis, two DSSC devices were developed; the first was sensitized with N719 alone and was used as a control, and the second was co-sensitized with a 1:1 (w/w) mixture of complex 1 and N719. Notably, the amount of N719 used in the co-sensitized device was only half (50%) that used in the control DSSC device.
The current–voltage (J–V) characteristics of the DSSC device based on the N719 and complex/N719 photoanodes are shown in Figure 7, and the efficiencies of the corresponding cells are summarized in Table 5. Under standard global AM1.5 solar irradiation conditions, the electrode performance (ηrel) of the complex/N719/TiO2 co-sensitized solar cell decreased by 7.63%, representing an acceptable value because the amount of N719 was lower. These results suggest that the co-sensitization of TiO2/N719 photoelectrodes with the Cu(I) complex is an option to reduce the amount of N719 dye, cutting costs while having a minor impact on the efficiency of DSSCs.

3. Conclusions

A new dinuclear copper(I) compound based on 3-(2-Pyridyl)-5,6-diphenyl-1,2,4-triazine as a chelating ligand and auxiliary phosphine Bis(diphenylphosphino)methane was prepared and characterized using a variety of analytic techniques. Additionally, computational studies were used to understand the electronic characteristics of the compound. The structural data revealed that the complex possesses a distorted trigonal pyramidal geometry and a variety of supramolecular interactions, such as C-H···N, C-H···π and π···π, which stabilize the crystalline structure. A comparison of experimental (SCXRD analysis) and calculated (DFT/M06/6-31G(d)+DZVP) bond lengths and bond angles showed excellent agreement, with variations less than 0.097 Å and 6.52°, respectively. Complexes 1 displays a low-intensity band at 410 nm, corresponding to MLCT transitions, consistent with the theoretical calculation realized with EtOH. According to the voltammetry analysis, the complex shows irreversible oxidation processes, which constitutes a drawback for the regeneration of dyes within DSSC devices. Devices based on TiO2/N719 and co-sensitized with the complex produce overall efficiencies of 92.27%, which is slightly lower than the reference device but employs only half the amount of the expensive and more toxic ruthenium dye (N719). The results of the current report shed some light on the design of co-sensitizers for the fabrication of new DSSCs with low prices and higher access to the Earth-abundant copper-based precursors.
Finally, the current findings suggest moving in two directions: (i) replacing the dppm ligand for a ligand that has anchoring functional groups, to seek an optimal balance between the efficiency of electron injection and the stability of the dye or (ii) replacing the diphenylphosphine ligand with a more suitable ligand to generate a beneficial impact on the absorption properties of the sensitizer.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/inorganics11100379/s1: Materials and Methods, Figures S1–S3, IR, 1H-NMR and 31P-NMR spectra of 1; Table S1, geometries of intermolecular hydrogen bonds and π···π contacts in complex 1. Figure S4, perspective views of [Cu2(L)2dppm]+ in the crystal structure of 1, showing (a) two five-membered Cu-N-C-C-N, (b) one six-membered Cu-N-N-Cu-N-N and (c) one seven-membered Cu-N-N-Cu-P-C-P chelate rings; Figure S5, intramolecular π···π interactions in the crystal structure of 1; Figure S6, intermolecular C-H···π and π-stacking interactions between pair of [Cu2(L)2dppm]+ cations; Figure S7, perspective view of the three-dimensional (3D) hydrogen-bonded network in the crystal structure of complex 1, formed through C-H···N, C-H···F, C-H···π and π···π interactions; Figure S8, percentages of intermolecular interactions in the fingerprint plot for complex 1; Figure S9, HOMO and LUMO frontier orbital plots of the title complex on TD-DFT calculations; Figure S10, UV–Vis absorption spectra of complex, free ligand L and N719 recorded in 2 × 10−5 mol/L solution in ethanol; Figure S11, cyclic voltammogram of [Cu2(L)2dppm](PF6)2 (5 × 10−3 M) in acetonitrile at T = 298 K using NBu4PF6 (0.1 M) as supporting electrolyte (scan rate = 20 mVs−1). Scheme S1. Schematic illustration of the operational principle of DSSC and energy diagram of HOMO and LUMO levels for dyes compared to the energy levels for TiO2. References [64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79] are cited in the supplementary materials.

Author Contributions

C.A.P., investigation, methodology, material analysis, and writing—original draft; J.J.C.-G., conceptualization, visualization, project administration, writing—original draft, and writing—review, and editing; E.A.R.-S., investigation, and methodology; A.C.-E., conceptualization, formal analysis, material analysis, and writing—original draft; R.S.-R., conceptualization, software and writing—original draft; J.B.-L., conceptualization and software; J.J.G., X-ray analysis, visualization, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing; M.F.-Á., X-ray and material analysis; V.M.-S., investigation, methodology; D.G.-M., software and validation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work received financial support from Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, México (DGIP-PRO-A2-023) and from Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT) in The form of a scholarship granted to C.A.P. (701513).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge access to the instrumental support in the USAII Facultad de Química. UNAM, México.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Caldeira, K.; Jain, A.K.; Hoffert, M.I. Climate Sensitivity Uncertainty and the Need for Energy without CO2 Emission. Science 2003, 299, 2052–2054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Olabi, A.G.; Abdelkareem, M.A. Renewable energy and climate change. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 158, 112111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Halkos, G.E.; Gkampoura, E.-C. Reviewing Usage, Potentials, and Limitations of Renewable Energy Sources. Energies 2020, 13, 2906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Eisenberg, R.; Nocera, D.G. Preface: Overview of the Forum on Solar and Renewable Energy. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 6799–6801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cho, A. Energy’s Tricky Tradeoffs. Science 2010, 329, 786–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mauri, L.; Colombo, A.; Dragonetti, C.; Fagnani, F. A Fascinating Trip into Iron and Copper Dyes for DSSCs. Inorganics 2022, 10, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. O’Regan, B.; Grätzel, M. A Low-Cost, High-Efficiency Solar Cell Based on Dye-Sensitized Colloidal TiO2 Films. Nature 1991, 353, 737–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Solak, E.K.; Irmak, E. Advances in organic photovoltaic cells: A comprehensive review of materials, technologies, and performance. RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 12244–12269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yahya, M.; Bouziani, A.; Ocak, C.; Seferoğlu, Z.; Sillanpää, M. Organic/metal-organic photosensitizers for dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSC): Recent developments, new trends, and future perceptions. Dye. Pigment. 2021, 192, 109227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Housecroft, C.E.; Constable, E.C. Solar energy conversion using first-row d-block metal coordination compound sensitizers and redox mediators. Chem. Sci. 2022, 13, 1225–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Muñoz-García, A.B.; Benesperi, I.; Boschloo, G.; Concepcion, J.J.; Delcamp, J.H.; Gibson, E.A.; Meyer, G.J.; Pavone, M.; Petters- son, H.; Hagfeldt, A.; et al. Dye-sensitized solar cells strike back. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 12450–12550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hagfeldt, A.; Boschloo, G.; Sun, L.; Kloo, L.; Pettersson, H. Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 6595–6663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Polo, A.S.; Itokazu, M.K.; Iha, N.Y.M. Metal complex sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem. Rev. 2004, 248, 1343–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Förster, C.; Heinze, K. Photophysics and photochemistry with Earth-abundant metals—Fundamentals and concepts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 1057–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kokkonen, M.; Talebi, P.; Zhou, J.; Asgari, S.; Soomro, S.A.; Elsehrawy, F.; Halme, J.; Ahmad, S.; Hagfeldt, A.; Hashmi, S.G. Advanced research trends in dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 10527–10545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Spinelli, G.; Freitag, M.; Benesperi, I. What is necessary to fill the technological gap to design sustainable dye-sensitized solar cells? Sustain. Energy Fuels 2023, 7, 916–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ozawa, H.; Sugiura, T.; Kuroda, T.; Nozawa, K.; Arakawa, H. Highly efficient dye-sensitized solar cells based on a ruthenium sensitizer bearing a hexylthiophene modified terpyridine ligand. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 1762–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mazloum-Ardakani, M.; Arazi, R. Improving the Effective Photovoltaic Performance in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Using an Azobenzenecarboxylic Acid-Based System. Heliyon 2019, 5, e01444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Emsley, J. The Elements, 3rd ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  20. Risi, G.; Devereux, M.; Prescimone, A.; Housecroft, C.E.; Constable, E.C. Back to the future: Asymmetrical DπA 2,2′-bipyridine ligands for homoleptic copper(I)-based dyes in dye-sensitized solar cells. RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 4122–4137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Beaudelot, J.; Oger, S.; Peruško, S.; Phan, T.-A.; Teunens, T.; Moucheron, C.; Evano, G. Photoactive Copper Complexes: Properties and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122, 16365–16609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cao, Y.; Saygili, Y.; Ummadisingu, A.; Teuscher, J.; Luo, J.; Pellet, N.; Giordano, F.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Moser, J.-E.; Freitag, M.; et al. 11% efficiency solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells with copper(II/I) hole transport materials. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Colombo, A.; Dragonetti, C.; Roberto, D.; Fagnani, F. Copper Complexes as Alternative Redox Mediators in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Molecules 2021, 26, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Franchi, D.; Leandri, V.; Pia Pizzichetti, A.R.; Xu, B.; Hao, Y.; Zhang, W.; Sloboda, T.; Svanström, S.; Cappel, U.B.; Kloo, L.; et al. Effect of the Ancillary Ligand on the Performance of Heteroleptic Cu(I) Diimine Complexes as Dyes in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2022, 5, 1460–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Alonso-Vante, N.; Nierengarten, J.F.; Sauvage, J.P. Spectral sensitization of large-band-gap semiconductors (thin films and ceramics) by a carboxylated bis(1,10-phenanthroline)copper(I) complex. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans 1994, 1649–1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Karpacheva, M.; Malzner, F.J.; Wobill, C.; Büttner, A.; Constable, E.C.; Housecroft, C.E. Cuprophilia: Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells with Copper(I) Dyes and Copper(I)/(II) Redox Shuttles. Dye. Pigment. 2018, 156, 410–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lennert, A.; Guldi, D.M. Homoleptic and Heteroleptic Copper Complexes as Redox Couples in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. ChemPhotoChem 2019, 3, 636–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Conradie, J. Polypyridyl copper complexes as dye sensitizer and redox mediator for dye-sensitized solar cells. Electrochem. Commun. 2022, 134, 107182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Báez-Castro, A.; Baldenebro-López, J.; Cruz-Enríquez, A.; Höpfl, H.; Glossman-Mitnik, D.; Miranda-Soto, V.; Parra-Hake, M.; Reynoso-Soto, E.; Campos-Gaxiola, J.J. Heteroleptic Cu(I) complexes containing polypyridyl ligands and triphenylphosphine: Synthesis, structure, photophysical properties, DFT studies and applications in co-sensitized solar cells. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2017, 466, 486–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Soto-Acosta, M.; Campos-Gaxiola, J.J.; Reynoso-Soto, E.; Cruz-Enríquez, A.; Baldenebro-López, J.; Höpfl, H.; García, J.J.; Flores-Álamo, M.; Miranda-Soto, V.; Glossman-Mitnik, D. Synthesis, Crystal Structure, DFT Studies and Optical/Electrochemical Properties of Two Novel Heteroleptic Copper(I) Complexes and Application in DSSC. Crystals 2022, 12, 1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Andrés-Tomé, I.; Fyson, J.; Dias, F.B.; Monkman, A.P.; Iacobellis, G.; Coppo, P. Copper(i) complexes with bipyridyl and phosphine ligands: A systematic study. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 8669–8674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pavia, D.; Lampman, G.; Kriz, G.; Vyvyan, J. Introduction to Spectroscopy; Cengage Learning: Belmont, CA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  33. Báez-Castro, A.; Baldenebro-López, J.; Cruz-Enríquez, A.; Höpfl, H.; Glossman-Mitnik, D.; Valentín, M.-S.; Parra-Hake, M.; Campos-Gaxiola, J.J. Synthesis, structure, characterization and photophysical properties of copper(i) complexes containing polypyridyl ligands. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 42624–42631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gusev, A.; Kiskin, M.; Braga, E.; Zamnius, E.; Kryukova, M.; Karaush-Karmazin, N.; Baryshnikov, G.; Minaev, B.; Linert, W. Structure and emission properties of dinuclear copper(I) complexes with pyridyltriazole. RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 3899–3909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yang, L.; Powell, D.R.; Houser, R.P. Structural variation in copper(i) complexes with pyridylmethylamide ligands: Structural analysis with a new four-coordinate geometry index, τ4. Dalton Trans. 2007, 955–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Femoni, C.; Muzzioli, S.; Palazzi, A.; Stagni, S.; Zacchini, S.; Monti, F.; Accorsi, G.; Bolognesi, M.; Armaroli, N.; Massi, M.; et al. New tetrazole-based Cu(I) homo- and heteroleptic complexes with various P^P ligands: Synthesis, characterization, redox and photophysical properties. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 997–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tong, Y.; Chen, X.-W.; He, L.-H.; Chen, J.-L.; Liu, S.-J.; Wen, H.-R. Reversible stimuli-responsive luminescence of bimetallic cuprous complexes based on NH-deprotonated 3-(2′-pyridyl)pyrazole. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9, 16664–16671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pathaw, L.; Khamrang, T.; Kathiravan, A.; Velusamy, M. Synthesis, crystal structure, bovine serum albumin binding studies of 1,2,4-triazine based copper(I) complexes. J. Mol. Struct. 2020, 1207, 127821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Janiak, C. A critical account on π–π stacking in metal complexes with aromatic nitrogen-containing ligands. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 2000, 3885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wöhler, J.; Meyer, M.; Prescimone, A.; Housecrof, C.E.; Constable, E.C. The effects of introducing terminal alkenyl substituents into the 2,2′-bipyridine domain in [Cu(N^N)(P^P)]+ coordination compounds. Dalton Trans. 2022, 51, 13094–13105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Nishio, M.; Umezawa, Y.; Honda, K.; Tsuboyama, S.; Suezawa, H. CH/π hydrogen bonds in organic and organometallic chemistry. CrystEngComm 2009, 11, 1757–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Keller, S.; Prescimone, A.; Constable, E.C.; Housecroft, C.E. Dinuclear [Cu2(N^N)(P^P)2][PF6]2 complexes containing bridging 2,3,5,6-tetra(pyridin-2-yl)pyrazine or 2,4,6-tri(pyridin-2-yl)-1,3,5-triazine ligands. Polyhedron 2016, 116, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Báez-Castro, A.; Baldenebro-López, J.; Ceballos-Mendivil, L.; Román-Bravo, P.P.; Höpfl, H.; Miranda-Soto, V.; Glossman-Mitnik, D.; Cruz-Enríquez, A.; Campos-Gaxiola, J.J. Synthesis, crystal structure, DFT studies and photophysical properties of a copper(I)–triphenylphosphane complex based on trans-(±)-2,4,5-tris-(pyridin-2-yl)-2-imidazoline. Acta Crystallogr. C Struct. Chem. 2017, 73, 280–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Spackman, M.A.; Jayatilaka, D. Hirshfeld surface analysis. CrystEngComm 2009, 11, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tan, S.L.; Jotani, M.M.; Tiekink, E.R.T. Utilizing Hirshfeld surface calculations, non-covalent interaction (NCI) plots and the calculation of interaction energies in the análisis of molecular packing. Acta Cryst. 2019, E75, 308–318. [Google Scholar]
  46. McKinnon, J.J.; Jayatilaka, D.; Spackman, M.A. Towards quantitative analysis of intermolecular interactions with Hirshfeld surfaces. Chem. Commun. 2007, 3814–3816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Spackman, M.A.; McKinnon, J.J. Fingerprinting intermolecular interactions in molecular crystals. CrystEngComm 2002, 4, 378–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. McKinnon, J.J.; Spackman, M.A.; Mitchell, A.S. Novel tools for visualizing and exploring intermolecular interactions in molecular crystals. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B Struct. Sci. 2004, B60, 627–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hohenberg, P.; Kohn, W. Inhomogeneous Electron Gas. Phys. Rev. 1964, 136, B864–B871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kohn, W.; Sham, L.J. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys. Rev. 1965, 140, A1133–A1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Stratmann, R.E.; Scuseria, G.E.; Frisch, M.J. An efficient implementation of time-dependent density-functional theory for the calculation of excitation energies of large molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 109, 8218–8224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Burke, K.; Werschnik, J.; Gross, E. Time-dependent density functional theory: Past, present, and future. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 123, 062206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhao, Y.; Truhlar, D.G. The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, non- covalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: Two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functionals. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2008, 120, 215–241. [Google Scholar]
  54. Rassolov, V.A.; Ratner, M.A.; Pople, J.A.; Redfern, P.C.; Curtiss, L.A. 6-31G* basis set for third-row atoms. J. Comput. Chem. 2001, 22, 976–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sosa, C.; Andzelm, J.; Elkin, B.C.; Wimmer, E.; Dobbs, K.D.; Dixon, D.A. A local density functional study of the structure and vibrational frequencies of molecular transition-metal compounds. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 6630–6636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wei, L.; Yang, Y.; Fan, R.; Na, Y.; Wang, P.; Dong, Y.; Yang, B.; Cao, W. N,N’-Bis((6-methoxylpyridin-2-yl)methylene)- p-phenylenediimine based d10 transition metal complexes and their utilization in co-sensitized solar cells. Dalton Trans. 2014, 43, 11361–11370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gao, S.; Fan, R.Q.; Wang, X.M.; Qiang, L.S.; Wei, L.G.; Wang, P.; Yang, Y.L.; Yu Lei Wang, Y.L.; Luan, T.Z. Multifunctional Zn(II)/Cd(II) metal complexes for tunable luminescence properties and highly efficient dye-sensitized solar cells. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 43705–43716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Baranova, K.F.; Titov, A.A.; Smol’yakov, A.; Chernyadyev, A.; Filippov, O.A.; Shubina, E. Mononuclear Copper(I) 3-(2-pyridyl)pyrazole Complexes: The Crucial Role of Phosphine on Photoluminescence. Molecules 2021, 26, 6869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Li, C.; Li, W.; Henwood, A.F.; Hall, D.; Cordes, B.D.; Slawin, A.M.Z.; Lemaur, V.; Olivier, Y.; Samuel, I.D.W.; Zysman-Colman, E. Luminescent Dinuclear Copper(I) Complexes Bearing an Imidazolylpyrimidine Bridging Ligand. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 59, 14772–14784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Peppas, A.; Sokalis, D.; Perganti, D.; Schnakenburg, G.; Falaras, P.; Philippopoulos, A.I. Sterically demanding pyridine-quinoline anchoring ligands as building blocks for copper(I)-based dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC) complexes. Dalton Trans. 2022, 51, 15049–15066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kumar, A.; Vashistha, V.K.; Tevatia, P.; Singh, R. Voltammetric Determination of Molecular Modeling Parameters for Pen- taazamacrocyclic Complexes of Mn(II) and Co(II). Anal. Bioanal. Electrochem. 2016, 8, 848–861. [Google Scholar]
  62. Al-horaibi, S.A.; Asiri, A.M.; El-Shishtawy, R.M.; Gaikwad, S.T.; Rajbhoj, A.S. Indoline, and benzothiazole-based squaraine dye-sensitized solar cells containing bis-pendent sulfonate groups: Synthesis, characterization and solar cell performance. J. Mol. Struct. 2019, 1195, 591–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Portillo-Cortez, K.; Martínez, A.; Dutt, A.; Santana, G. N719 Derivatives for Application in a Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell (DSSC): A Theoretical Study. J. Phys. Chem. A 2019, 123, 10930–10939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. CrysAlisPro, Version 1.171.37.35; Agilent Technologies: Yarnton, UK, 2014.
  65. Clark, R.C.; Reid, J.S. The analytical calculation of absorption in multifaceted crystals. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A Found. Crystal-logr. 1995, A51, 887–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sheldrick, G.M. ShelXT-Integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination. Acta Cryst. 2015, A71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sheldrick, G.M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C Struct. Chem. 2015, C71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Macrae, C.F.; Bruno, I.J.; Chisholm, J.A.; Edgington, P.R.; McCabe, P.; Pidcock, E.; Rodriguez-Monge, L.; Taylor, R.; van de Streek, J.; Wood, P.A. Mercury CSD 2.0—New features for the visualization and investigation of crystal structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2008, 41, 466–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Brandenburg, K. Diamond, version 4.3.2; Crystal Impact GbR: Bonn, Germany, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  70. Ito, S.; Chen, P.; Comte, P.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Liska, P.; Péchy, P.; Grätzel, M. Fabrication of screen-printing pastes from TiO2 powders for dye-sensitized solar cells. Prog. Photovoltaics 2007, 15, 603–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ito, S.; Murakami, T.N.; Comte, P.; Liska, P.; Grätzel, C.C.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Grätzel, M. Fabrication of Thin Film Dye Sensi-tized Solar Cells with Solar to Electric Power Conversion Efficiency over 10%. Thin Solid Film. 2008, 516, 4613–4619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Turner, M.J.; McKinnon, J.J.; Wolff, S.K.; Grimwood, D.J.; Spackman, P.R.; Jayatilaka, D.; Spackman, M.A. CrystalExplorer17; University of Western Australia: Crawley, WA, Australia, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  73. Luo, C.; He, X.; Zhong, A.; Liu, S.; Zhao, D. What dictates alkane isomerization? A combined density functional theory and information theoretic approach study. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2023, 142, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Guo, Z.A.; Xian, J.Y.; Rong, L.R.; Qin, H.; Jie, Z. Theoretical study of metal ion impact on geometric and electronic properties of terbutaline compounds. Monatsh Chem. 2019, 150, 1355–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Mennucci, V.B.; Petersson, G.A.; Nakatsuji, H.; et al. Gaussian 09, Revision A. 02; Gaussian Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  76. Dennington, R.; Keith, T.; Millam, J.; Eppinnett, K.; Hovell, W.L.; Gilliland, R. GaussView, Version 5.0.9; Semichem, Inc.: Shaw-nee Mission, KS, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  77. Gorelsky, S.I.; Lever, A.B.P. Electronic Structure and Spectra of Ruthenium Diimine Complexes by Density Functional Theory and INDO/S. Comparison of the Two Methods. J. Organomet. Chem. 2001, 635, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Scrocco, E.; Tomasi, J. Electronic Molecular Structure, Reactivity, and Intermolecular Forces: An Euristic Inter-pretation by Means of Electrostatic Molecular Potentials. Adv. Quantum Chem. 1978, 11, 115–193. [Google Scholar]
  79. Improta, R.; Barone, V.; Scalmani, G.; Frisch, M.J. A State-Specific Polarizable Continuum Model Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory Method for Excited State Calculations in Solution. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 125, 054103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Inorganics 11 00379 sch001
Scheme 1. Synthetic route for complex 1.
Scheme 1. Synthetic route for complex 1.
Inorganics 11 00379 sch001
Inorganics 11 00379 g001
Figure 1. Perspective view of the molecular structure and metal coordination polyhedra for [Cu2(L)2dppm]+ in the crystal structure of 1. Hydrogen atoms and counterions were omitted for clarity.
Figure 1. Perspective view of the molecular structure and metal coordination polyhedra for [Cu2(L)2dppm]+ in the crystal structure of 1. Hydrogen atoms and counterions were omitted for clarity.
Inorganics 11 00379 g001
Inorganics 11 00379 g002
Figure 2. Hirshfeld surface for the title complex mapped with dnorm (a), curvedness (b), and shape index (c).
Figure 2. Hirshfeld surface for the title complex mapped with dnorm (a), curvedness (b), and shape index (c).
Inorganics 11 00379 g002
Inorganics 11 00379 g003
Figure 3. 2D full fingerprint plot and percentage contributions of the Hirshfeld surface area for the complex.
Figure 3. 2D full fingerprint plot and percentage contributions of the Hirshfeld surface area for the complex.
Inorganics 11 00379 g003
Inorganics 11 00379 g004
Figure 4. A plot of the molecular orbitals involved in the lowest-lying electronic absorption transitions in the complex.
Figure 4. A plot of the molecular orbitals involved in the lowest-lying electronic absorption transitions in the complex.
Inorganics 11 00379 g004
Inorganics 11 00379 g005
Figure 5. Experimental and calculated absorption spectra of [Cu2(L)2dppm](PF6)2.
Figure 5. Experimental and calculated absorption spectra of [Cu2(L)2dppm](PF6)2.
Inorganics 11 00379 g005
Inorganics 11 00379 g006
Figure 6. TGA curve of complex 1.
Figure 6. TGA curve of complex 1.
Inorganics 11 00379 g006
Inorganics 11 00379 g007
Figure 7. J–V curves for DSSCs of N719 and complex/N719. Inset: Photo of the DSSC device containing dye complex/N719.
Figure 7. J–V curves for DSSCs of N719 and complex/N719. Inset: Photo of the DSSC device containing dye complex/N719.
Inorganics 11 00379 g007
Table 1. Main signals (cm−1) in the infrared spectra of ligand L, ppm, and complex [Cu2(L)2dppm](PF6)2 *.
Table 1. Main signals (cm−1) in the infrared spectra of ligand L, ppm, and complex [Cu2(L)2dppm](PF6)2 *.
Compoundν (C-H)ν (C=Nimino)ν (C=C)ν (P-C)ν (P-F)
L3050 (w)1579 (m)
1502 (s)		1483 (m)__
Dppm3055 (w)_1581 (w)
1479 (m)		1429 (m)_
[Cu2(L)2dppm](PF6)23054 (w)1600 (m),
1511 (s)		1481 (m) 1436 (m)838 (s)
* w = weak, m = medium, s = strong.
Table 2. Experimental (scXRD) and calculated (M06/6-31G(d)+DZVP) data of distances [Å] and angles [°] relevant to the coordination geometries of copper(I) atoms in the complex.
Table 2. Experimental (scXRD) and calculated (M06/6-31G(d)+DZVP) data of distances [Å] and angles [°] relevant to the coordination geometries of copper(I) atoms in the complex.
Distances (Å) and Angles (°)ExperimentalDFTΔd/Δ∠
Cu(1)-N(8)2.047(3)2.0940.0470
Cu(1)-N(2)2.063(3)2.1110.0480
Cu(1)-N(6)2.072(3)2.1690.0970
Cu(1)-P(1)2.183(11)2.2220.0389
Cu(2)-N(5)2.016(3)2.0620.0460
Cu(2)-N(4)2.101(3)2.1320.0310
Cu(2)-N(1)2.136(3)2.1630.0270
Cu(2)-P(2)2.210(11)2.2240.0138
N(8)-Cu(1)-N(2)111.85(13)112.260.41
N(8)-Cu(1)-N(6)79.00(13)77.071.92
N(2)-Cu(1)-N(6)95.50(13)94.650.84
N(8)-Cu(1)-P(1)129.33(10)130.130.80
N(2)-Cu(1)-P(1)108.25(9)112.304.05
N(6)-Cu(1)-P(1)126.45(9)119.926.52
N(5)-Cu(2)-N(4)120.54(13)117.23.30
N(5)-Cu(2)-N(1)96.31(12)95.530.78
N(4)-Cu(2)-N(1)77.67(12)76.121.54
N(5)-Cu(2)-P(2)130.45(10)129.221.22
N(4)-Cu(2)-P(2)106.72(9)111.544.81
N(1)-Cu(2)-P(2)108.05(9)109.191.14
Table 3. Principal electronic excited states calculated by time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) at M06/6-31G(d)+DZVP level of calculation, together with the experimental values *.
Table 3. Principal electronic excited states calculated by time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) at M06/6-31G(d)+DZVP level of calculation, together with the experimental values *.
λDFT (nm) E (eV)λExp (nm)Oscillator Strength Transition (CI Coef.)Character
446(2.77)4100.0922HOMO→LUMO (41%)
HOMO-2→LUMO (25%)		MLCT/XLCT/LLCT
428(2.89) 0.035HOMO→LUMO+1 (29%)
HOMO-2→LUMO+1 (21%)		MLCT/XLCT/LLCT
424(2.92) 0.037HOMO-1→LUMO+1 (29%)MLCT/XLCT/LLCT
363(2.41)3380.0565HOMO-3→LUMO+3 (34%)
HOMO-6→LUMO (21%)		LLCT
375(3.31) 0.0313HOMO-6→LUMO (26%)LLCT
359(3.45)2860.0449HOMO-10→LUMO (20%)
HOMO-6→LUMO (18%)		LLCT
352(3.51) 0.0367HOMO-5→LUMO+1 (36%)
HOMO-4→LUMO (21%)		MLCT/XLCT/LLCT
* Metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT); Ligand-to-ligand charge transfer (LLCT); Phosphine-to-ligand charge transfer (XLCT).
Table 4. Summary electrochemical data of the [Cu2(L)2dppm](PF6)2 complex in acetonitrile *.
Table 4. Summary electrochemical data of the [Cu2(L)2dppm](PF6)2 complex in acetonitrile *.
Eox [V]Ered [V]EHOMO [eV]ELUMO [eV]EHOMO/DFT [eV]ELUMO/DFT [eV]ΔE [eV]ΔE/DFT [eV]
Complex1.15−1.61−5.53−2.77−6.657−3.0342.763.623
* The CV was recorded in acetonitrile solution for the complex (5 × 10−3 M) with 0.1 M of NBu4PF6 (T = 298 K, scan rate = 25 mV s−1), ΔE [eV] = ELUMO − EHOMO.
Table 5. J–V performance of DSSCs based on different photoelectrodes.
Table 5. J–V performance of DSSCs based on different photoelectrodes.
DyesJsc (mA/cm2)Voc (V)FF (%)η (%)ηRelative (%)
a Complex/N719 (1:1)5.0950.75752.72.0392.27
N7196.0300.77047.32.2100
Jsc = short circuit current, VOC = open circuit potential, FF = fill factor, η = power conversion efficiency. a The electrode based on the dye combination 1/N719 contains only 50% of N719 compared to the control experiment with only N719.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Peñuelas, C.A.; Campos-Gaxiola, J.J.; Soto-Rojo, R.; Cruz-Enríquez, A.; Reynoso-Soto, E.A.; Miranda-Soto, V.; García, J.J.; Flores-Álamo, M.; Baldenebro-López, J.; Glossman-Mitnik, D. Synthesis of a New Dinuclear Cu(I) Complex with a Triazine Ligand and Diphenylphosphine Methane: X-ray Structure, Optical Properties, DFT Calculations, and Application in DSSCs. Inorganics 2023, 11, 379. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11100379

AMA Style

Peñuelas CA, Campos-Gaxiola JJ, Soto-Rojo R, Cruz-Enríquez A, Reynoso-Soto EA, Miranda-Soto V, García JJ, Flores-Álamo M, Baldenebro-López J, Glossman-Mitnik D. Synthesis of a New Dinuclear Cu(I) Complex with a Triazine Ligand and Diphenylphosphine Methane: X-ray Structure, Optical Properties, DFT Calculations, and Application in DSSCs. Inorganics. 2023; 11(10):379. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11100379

Chicago/Turabian Style

Peñuelas, Carlos A., José J. Campos-Gaxiola, Rody Soto-Rojo, Adriana Cruz-Enríquez, Edgar A. Reynoso-Soto, Valentín Miranda-Soto, Juventino J. García, Marcos Flores-Álamo, Jesús Baldenebro-López, and Daniel Glossman-Mitnik. 2023. "Synthesis of a New Dinuclear Cu(I) Complex with a Triazine Ligand and Diphenylphosphine Methane: X-ray Structure, Optical Properties, DFT Calculations, and Application in DSSCs" Inorganics 11, no. 10: 379. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11100379

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop