Bubbles, Blind-Spots and Brexit
AbstractIn this paper we develop a well-established financial model to investigate whether bubbles were present in opinion polls and betting markets prior to the UK’s vote on EU membership on 23 June 2016. The importance of our contribution is threefold. Firstly, our continuous-time model allows for irregularly spaced time series—a common feature of polling data. Secondly, we build on qualitative comparisons that are often made between market cycles and voting patterns. Thirdly, our approach is theoretically elegant. Thus, where bubbles are found we suggest a suitable adjustment. We find evidence of bubbles in polling data. This suggests they systematically over-estimate the proportion voting for remain. In contrast, bookmakers’ odds appear to show none of this bubble-like over-confidence. However, implied probabilities from bookmakers’ odds appear remarkably unresponsive to polling data that nonetheless indicates a close-fought vote. View Full-Text
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Fry, J.; Brint, A. Bubbles, Blind-Spots and Brexit. Risks 2017, 5, 37.
Fry J, Brint A. Bubbles, Blind-Spots and Brexit. Risks. 2017; 5(3):37.Chicago/Turabian Style
Fry, John; Brint, Andrew. 2017. "Bubbles, Blind-Spots and Brexit." Risks 5, no. 3: 37.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.