On Comparison of Stochastic Reserving Methods with Bootstrapping
AbstractWe consider the well-known stochastic reserve estimation methods on the basis of generalized linear models, such as the (over-dispersed) Poisson model, the gamma model and the log-normal model. For the likely variability of the claims reserve, bootstrap method is considered. In the bootstrapping framework, we discuss the choice of residuals, namely the Pearson residuals, the deviance residuals and the Anscombe residuals. In addition, several possible residual adjustments are discussed and compared in a case study. We carry out a practical implementation and comparison of methods using real-life insurance data to estimate reserves and their prediction errors. We propose to consider proper scoring rules for model validation, and the assessments will be drawn from an extensive case study. View Full-Text
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Tee, L.; Käärik, M.; Viin, R. On Comparison of Stochastic Reserving Methods with Bootstrapping. Risks 2017, 5, 2.
Tee L, Käärik M, Viin R. On Comparison of Stochastic Reserving Methods with Bootstrapping. Risks. 2017; 5(1):2.Chicago/Turabian Style
Tee, Liivika; Käärik, Meelis; Viin, Rauno. 2017. "On Comparison of Stochastic Reserving Methods with Bootstrapping." Risks 5, no. 1: 2.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.