Clinical Outcomes Used in Clinical Pharmacy Intervention Studies in Secondary Care
The Danish Research Unit for Hospital Pharmacy, Amgros I/S, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
The Hospital Pharmacy, Central Denmark Region, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
Statistics and Pharmacoepidemiology, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
Region Zealand Hospital Pharmacy, 4700 Næstved, Denmark
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Jeffrey Atkinson
Received: 10 March 2017 / Revised: 30 April 2017 / Accepted: 15 May 2017 / Published: 20 May 2017
The objective was to investigate type, frequency and result of clinical outcomes used in studies to assess the effect of clinical pharmacy interventions in inpatient care. The literature search using Pubmed.gov
was performed for the period up to 2013 using the search phrases: “Intervention(s)” and “pharmacist(s)” and “controlled” and “outcome(s)” or “effect(s)”. Primary research studies in English of controlled, clinical pharmacy intervention studies, including outcome evaluation, were selected. Titles, abstracts and full-text papers were assessed individually by two reviewers, and inclusion was determined by consensus. In total, 37 publications were included in the review. The publications presented similar intervention elements but differed in study design. A large variety of outcome measures (135) had been used to evaluate the effect of the interventions; most frequently clinical measures/assessments by physician and health care service use. No apparent pattern was established among primary outcome measures with significant effect in favour of the intervention, but positive effect was most frequently related to studies that included power calculations and sufficient inclusion of patients (73% vs. 25%). This review emphasizes the importance of considering the relevance of outcomes selected to assess clinical pharmacy interventions and the importance of conducting a proper power calculation.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
Scifeed alert for new publications
Never miss any articles
matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
Define your Scifeed now
Share & Cite This Article
MDPI and ACS Style
Kjeldsen, L.J.; Olesen, C.; Hansen, M.K.; Nielsen, T.R.H. Clinical Outcomes Used in Clinical Pharmacy Intervention Studies in Secondary Care. Pharmacy 2017, 5, 28.
Kjeldsen LJ, Olesen C, Hansen MK, Nielsen TRH. Clinical Outcomes Used in Clinical Pharmacy Intervention Studies in Secondary Care. Pharmacy. 2017; 5(2):28.
Kjeldsen, Lene J.; Olesen, Charlotte; Hansen, Merete K.; Nielsen, Trine R.H. 2017. "Clinical Outcomes Used in Clinical Pharmacy Intervention Studies in Secondary Care." Pharmacy 5, no. 2: 28.
Show more citation formats
Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
[Return to top]
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.