Next Article in Journal
Competence-Based Pharmacy Education in the University of Helsinki
Previous Article in Journal
Pharmacist Intervention Program at Different Rent Levels of Geriatric Healthcare
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Pharmacy 2017, 5(2), 28; doi:10.3390/pharmacy5020028

Clinical Outcomes Used in Clinical Pharmacy Intervention Studies in Secondary Care

1
The Danish Research Unit for Hospital Pharmacy, Amgros I/S, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
2
The Hospital Pharmacy, Central Denmark Region, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
3
Statistics and Pharmacoepidemiology, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
4
Region Zealand Hospital Pharmacy, 4700 Næstved, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Jeffrey Atkinson
Received: 10 March 2017 / Revised: 30 April 2017 / Accepted: 15 May 2017 / Published: 20 May 2017
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [674 KB, uploaded 20 May 2017]   |  

Abstract

The objective was to investigate type, frequency and result of clinical outcomes used in studies to assess the effect of clinical pharmacy interventions in inpatient care. The literature search using Pubmed.gov was performed for the period up to 2013 using the search phrases: “Intervention(s)” and “pharmacist(s)” and “controlled” and “outcome(s)” or “effect(s)”. Primary research studies in English of controlled, clinical pharmacy intervention studies, including outcome evaluation, were selected. Titles, abstracts and full-text papers were assessed individually by two reviewers, and inclusion was determined by consensus. In total, 37 publications were included in the review. The publications presented similar intervention elements but differed in study design. A large variety of outcome measures (135) had been used to evaluate the effect of the interventions; most frequently clinical measures/assessments by physician and health care service use. No apparent pattern was established among primary outcome measures with significant effect in favour of the intervention, but positive effect was most frequently related to studies that included power calculations and sufficient inclusion of patients (73% vs. 25%). This review emphasizes the importance of considering the relevance of outcomes selected to assess clinical pharmacy interventions and the importance of conducting a proper power calculation. View Full-Text
Keywords: outcomes; clinical pharmacy; hospital; effect; review outcomes; clinical pharmacy; hospital; effect; review
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Kjeldsen, L.J.; Olesen, C.; Hansen, M.K.; Nielsen, T.R.H. Clinical Outcomes Used in Clinical Pharmacy Intervention Studies in Secondary Care. Pharmacy 2017, 5, 28.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Pharmacy EISSN 2226-4787 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top