Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Damage Detection in a Composite T-Joint Using Guided Lamb Waves
Previous Article in Journal
Maintenance Model of Digital Avionics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mechanical and Non-Destructive Study of CFRP Adhesive Bonds Subjected to Pre-Bond Thermal Treatment and De-Icing Fluid Contamination
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Aerospace 2018, 5(2), 39; doi:10.3390/aerospace5020039

Transducer Placement Option of Lamb Wave SHM System for Hotspot Damage Monitoring

1
Aerospace Non-Destructive Testing Laboratory, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands
2
Chair of Structural Integrity and Composites, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 27 February 2018 / Revised: 24 March 2018 / Accepted: 28 March 2018 / Published: 4 April 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Selected Papers from IWSHM 2017)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [79142 KB, uploaded 4 April 2018]   |  

Abstract

In this paper, we investigated transducer placement strategies for detecting cracks in primary aircraft structures using ultrasonic Structural Health Monitoring (SHM). The approach developed is for an expected damage location based on fracture mechanics, for example fatigue crack growth in a high stress location. To assess the performance of the developed approach, finite-element (FE) modelling of a damage-tolerant aluminum fuselage has been performed by introducing an artificial crack at a rivet hole into the structural FE model and assessing its influence on the Lamb wave propagation, compared to a baseline measurement simulation. The efficient practical sensor position was determined from the largest change in area that is covered by reflected and missing wave scatter using an additive color model. Blob detection algorithms were employed to determine the boundaries of this area and to calculate the blob centroid. To demonstrate that the technique can be generalized, the results from different crack lengths and from tilted crack are also presented. View Full-Text
Keywords: sensor placement option; hotspot damage; Lamb wave; Structural Health Monitoring (SHM); finite element modelling; image processing; additive color model sensor placement option; hotspot damage; Lamb wave; Structural Health Monitoring (SHM); finite element modelling; image processing; additive color model
Figures

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Ewald, V.; Groves, R.M.; Benedictus, R. Transducer Placement Option of Lamb Wave SHM System for Hotspot Damage Monitoring. Aerospace 2018, 5, 39.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Aerospace EISSN 2226-4310 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top