Next Article in Journal
Winglet Geometry Impact on DLR-F4 Aerodynamics and an Analysis of a Hyperbolic Winglet Concept
Next Article in Special Issue
Discontinuous Galerkin Finite Element Investigation on the Fully-Compressible Navier–Stokes Equations for Microscale Shock-Channels
Previous Article in Journal
An Overview of Cube-Satellite Propulsion Technologies and Trends
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessing the Ability of the DDES Turbulence Modeling Approach to Simulate the Wake of a Bluff Body
Article Menu
Issue 4 (December) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Aerospace 2017, 4(4), 59; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace4040059

Investigation of Numerical Dissipation in Classical and Implicit Large Eddy Simulations

Centre for Computational Engineering Sciences, Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedfordshire MK43 0AL, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 21 November 2017 / Revised: 6 December 2017 / Accepted: 7 December 2017 / Published: 11 December 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Computational Aerodynamic Modeling of Aerospace Vehicles)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [5899 KB, uploaded 11 December 2017]   |  

Abstract

The quantitative measure of dissipative properties of different numerical schemes is crucial to computational methods in the field of aerospace applications. Therefore, the objective of the present study is to examine the resolving power of Monotonic Upwind Scheme for Conservation Laws (MUSCL) scheme with three different slope limiters: one second-order and two third-order used within the framework of Implicit Large Eddy Simulations (ILES). The performance of the dynamic Smagorinsky subgrid-scale model used in the classical Large Eddy Simulation (LES) approach is examined. The assessment of these schemes is of significant importance to understand the numerical dissipation that could affect the accuracy of the numerical solution. A modified equation analysis has been employed to the convective term of the fully-compressible Navier–Stokes equations to formulate an analytical expression of truncation error for the second-order upwind scheme. The contribution of second-order partial derivatives in the expression of truncation error showed that the effect of this numerical error could not be neglected compared to the total kinetic energy dissipation rate. Transitions from laminar to turbulent flow are visualized considering the inviscid Taylor–Green Vortex (TGV) test-case. The evolution in time of volumetrically-averaged kinetic energy and kinetic energy dissipation rate have been monitored for all numerical schemes and all grid levels. The dissipation mechanism has been compared to Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS) data found in the literature at different Reynolds numbers. We found that the resolving power and the symmetry breaking property are enhanced with finer grid resolutions. The production of vorticity has been observed in terms of enstrophy and effective viscosity. The instantaneous kinetic energy spectrum has been computed using a three-dimensional Fast Fourier Transform (FFT). All combinations of numerical methods produce a k 4 spectrum at t * = 4 , and near the dissipation peak, all methods were capable of predicting the k 5 / 3 slope accurately when refining the mesh. View Full-Text
Keywords: large eddy simulation; Taylor–Green vortex; numerical dissipation; modified equation analysis; truncation error; MUSCL; dynamic Smagorinsky subgrid-scale model; kinetic energy dissipation large eddy simulation; Taylor–Green vortex; numerical dissipation; modified equation analysis; truncation error; MUSCL; dynamic Smagorinsky subgrid-scale model; kinetic energy dissipation
Figures

Graphical abstract

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

El Rafei, M.; Könözsy, L.; Rana, Z. Investigation of Numerical Dissipation in Classical and Implicit Large Eddy Simulations. Aerospace 2017, 4, 59.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Aerospace EISSN 2226-4310 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top