Comparison of Power Requirements: Flapping vs. Fixed Wing Vehicles
AbstractThe power required by flapping and fixed wing vehicles in level flight is determined and compared. Based on a new modelling approach, the effects of flapping on the induced drag in flapping wing vehicles are mathematically described. It is shown that flapping causes a significant increase in the induced drag when compared with a non-flapping, fixed wing vehicle. There are two effects for that induced drag increase; one is due to tilting of the lift vector caused by flapping the wings and the other results from changes in the amount of the lift vector during flapping. The induced drag increase yields a significant contribution to the power required by flapping wing vehicles. Furthermore, the power characteristics of fixed wing vehicles are dealt with. It is shown that, for this vehicle type, the propeller efficiency plays a major role. This is because there are considerable differences in the propeller efficiency when taking the size of vehicles into account. Comparing flapping and fixed wing vehicles, the conditions are shown where flapping wing vehicles have a lower power demand and where fixed wing vehicles are superior regarding the required power. There is a tendency such that fixed wing vehicles have an advantage in the case of larger size vehicles and flapping wing vehicles have an advantage in the case of smaller size ones. View Full-Text
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Sachs, G. Comparison of Power Requirements: Flapping vs. Fixed Wing Vehicles. Aerospace 2016, 3, 31.
Sachs G. Comparison of Power Requirements: Flapping vs. Fixed Wing Vehicles. Aerospace. 2016; 3(4):31.Chicago/Turabian Style
Sachs, Gottfried. 2016. "Comparison of Power Requirements: Flapping vs. Fixed Wing Vehicles." Aerospace 3, no. 4: 31.