Next Article in Journal
Employing Search Engine Optimization (SEO) Techniques for Improving the Discovery of Geospatial Resources on the Web
Next Article in Special Issue
An Interactive Planning Support Tool for Addressing Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy Projects in The Netherlands
Previous Article in Journal
Mapping Parallels between Outdoor Urban Environments and Indoor Manufacturing Environments
Previous Article in Special Issue
Closing Data Gaps with Citizen Science? Findings from the Danube Region
Article Menu
Issue 9 (September) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2017, 6(9), 282; doi:10.3390/ijgi6090282

The Governance Landscape of Geospatial E-Services—The Belgian Case

1
KU Leuven Public Governance Institute, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
2
School for Science and Technology, International Hellenic University, 57001 Thermi, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 14 July 2017 / Revised: 9 August 2017 / Accepted: 21 August 2017 / Published: 7 September 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovative Geo-Information Tools for Governance)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [306 KB, uploaded 7 September 2017]

Abstract

Geospatial data and geospatial e-services require governance and coordination between different governmental organisations. This article aims to understand what governance, and specifically what coordination, is used in Belgium for geospatial e-services and data. The Belgian case, with a focus on the regions and federal administration, is researched by making use of a document analysis, interviews with key stakeholders and an online survey. In contrast to the federal and Walloon administration, the Flemish administration and the Brussels Capital Region administration have a clearly developed governance model. Flanders combines hierarchy with network governance, whereas the Brussels administration is known for its hierarchical way of working. The transposition of the INSPIRE Directive had a strong influence: The Brussels Capital Region became more network-oriented, and the Walloon Region developed a form of network governance. The federal level, however, struggles to make the connection between geospatial data and e-services. From an inter-organisational perspective, the coordination can be labelled as a weak form of network governance: Cooperation exists, but only in a few areas. Nevertheless, geospatial data are exchanged within and between regions and the federal level. Geospatial e-services are also developed but there is a clear influence of the degree of organisational coordination on the development of geospatial e-services. View Full-Text
Keywords: e-services; geospatial data; governance; coordination; Belgium e-services; geospatial data; governance; coordination; Belgium
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Chantillon, M.; Crompvoets, J.; Peristeras, V. The Governance Landscape of Geospatial E-Services—The Belgian Case. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2017, 6, 282.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. EISSN 2220-9964 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top