Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Urban Public Transport on Residential Transaction Prices: A Case Study of Poznań, Poland
Previous Article in Journal
Building-Level Urban Functional Area Identification Based on Multi-Attribute Aggregated Data from Cell Phones—A Method Combining Multidimensional Time Series with a SOM Neural Network
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Park, G. A Comprehensive Analysis of Hurricane Damage across the U.S. Gulf and Atlantic Coasts Using Geospatial Big Data. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2021, 10, 781

Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies (CURDS), School of Geography, Politics and Sociology, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2022, 11(2), 73; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11020073
Submission received: 21 December 2021 / Accepted: 27 December 2021 / Published: 19 January 2022
Text Correction
There was an error in the original publication [1]. The number of counties was incorrect (the number should be 775 instead of 777).
A correction has been made to Abstract:
Original:
(3) Results: A total of 777 counties were found to comprise the “hurricane-prone coastal counties” that have experienced at least one instance of hurricane damage over the study period.
Corrected:
(3) Results: A total of 775 counties were found to comprise the “hurricane-prone coastal counties” that have experienced at least one instance of hurricane damage over the study period.
A correction has been made to Section 3.2. At-Risk Populations in the Hurricane-Prone Coastal Counties, Paragraph 1:
Original:
Combining the spatial extent of hurricane-damaged areas of F0, F1, F2, and F3 winds (Figure 10a) and storm surges (Figure 10b), the spatial coverage of this study area consists of 777 counties over 22 states (Figure 10c). The list of coastal counties defined in this study is set out in Appendix A.
Corrected:
Combining the spatial extent of hurricane-damaged areas of F0, F1, F2, and F3 winds (Figure 10a) and storm surges (Figure 10b), the spatial coverage of this study area consists of 775 counties over 22 states (Figure 10c). The list of coastal counties defined in this study is set out in Appendix A.
A correction has been made to Section 3.2. At-Risk Populations in the Hurricane-Prone Coastal Counties, Figure 10 (Caption):
Original:
Figure 10. (a) The coastal counties affected by wind damage according to the Fujita scale (F0, F1, F2, and F3); (b) the coastal counties affected by storm surges; (c) the 777 hurricane-prone coastal counties defined in this study.
Corrected:
Figure 10. (a) The coastal counties affected by wind damage according to the Fujita scale (F0, F1, F2, and F3); (b) the coastal counties affected by storm surges; (c) the 775 hurricane-prone coastal counties defined in this study.
A correction has been made to Section 4. Discussion, Paragraph 1 and Paragraph 2:
Original:
As a result, 777 counties were found to comprise the hurricane at-risk zones that have experienced at least one instance of hurricane damage over the last six decades.
Corrected:
As a result, 775 counties were found to comprise the hurricane at-risk zones that have experienced at least one instance of hurricane damage over the last six decades.
Original:
The current study proposed the geographical extent of 777 hurricane-prone coastal counties that border the Gulf of Mexico and the eastern Atlantic Coast of the United States, excluding the Pacific Coast (Appendix A).
Corrected:
The current study proposed the geographical extent of 775 hurricane-prone coastal counties that border the Gulf of Mexico and the eastern Atlantic Coast of the United States, excluding the Pacific Coast (Appendix A).
A correction has been made to Appendix A (title):
Original:
Appendix A. Hurricane-prone coastal counties (n = 777) along the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf Coasts defined in this study.
Corrected:
Appendix A. Hurricane-prone coastal counties (n = 775) along the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf Coasts defined in this study.
The authors apologise for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Park, G. A Comprehensive Analysis of Hurricane Damage across the U.S. Gulf and Atlantic Coasts Using Geospatial Big Data. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2021, 10, 781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Park, G. Correction: Park, G. A Comprehensive Analysis of Hurricane Damage across the U.S. Gulf and Atlantic Coasts Using Geospatial Big Data. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2021, 10, 781. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2022, 11, 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11020073

AMA Style

Park G. Correction: Park, G. A Comprehensive Analysis of Hurricane Damage across the U.S. Gulf and Atlantic Coasts Using Geospatial Big Data. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2021, 10, 781. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2022; 11(2):73. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11020073

Chicago/Turabian Style

Park, Gainbi. 2022. "Correction: Park, G. A Comprehensive Analysis of Hurricane Damage across the U.S. Gulf and Atlantic Coasts Using Geospatial Big Data. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2021, 10, 781" ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 11, no. 2: 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11020073

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop