Next Article in Journal
Shadow and Weak Deflection Angle of a Black Hole in Nonlocal Gravity
Next Article in Special Issue
Using Neutrino Oscillations to Measure H0?
Previous Article in Journal
Cluster Membership of Galaxies Using Multi-Layer Perceptron Neural Network
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Note on Proton Stability in the Standard Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Accelerated Universe from Modified Chaplygin Gas and Tachyonic Fluid

Department of Applied Physics and Astronomy, University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 27272, United Arab Emirates
Universe 2022, 8(7), 340; https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8070340
Submission received: 10 June 2022 / Revised: 10 June 2022 / Accepted: 16 June 2022 / Published: 21 June 2022

Abstract

:
A cosmological model with an exotic fluid is investigated. We show that the equation of state of this “modified Chaplygin” gas can describe the current accelerated expansion of the universe. We then reexpress it as FRW cosmological model containing a scalar field ϕ and find its self-interacting potential. Moreover motivated by recent works on tachyon field theory, a map for this exotic fluid as a normal scalar field ϕ with Lagrangian L ϕ = ϕ ˙ 2 2 U ( ϕ ) to the tachyonic field T with Lagrangian L T = V ( T ) 1 T ˙ 2 is obtained.

1. Introduction

Recent measurements of redshift and luminosity-distance relations of type Ia supernovae indicate that the expansion of the universe is accelerating [1,2,3,4,5]. This appears to be in strong disagreement with the standard picture of a matter dominated universe. These observations can be accommodated theoretically by postulating that certain exotic matter with negative pressure dominates the present epoch of our universe. Such exotic matter has been called Quintessence and behaves like a vacuum field energy with a repulsive (anti-gravitational) character arising from the negative pressure.
Negative pressure leading to an accelerating universe can also be obtained in a Chaplygin gas cosmology [6], in which the matter is taken to be a perfect fluid obeying an exotic equation of state. This cosmological model has some interesting properties. In particular, the Chaplygin gas behaves as pressureless fluid for small values of the scale factor and as a cosmological constant for large values of the scale factor which tends to accelerate the expansion.
Another interesting feature of the Chaplygin gas equation of state is its connection to string theory via a brane interpretation. It was shown in [7,8,9,10,11] that this kind of exotic equation of state can be obtained from the Nambu–Goto action for a D-brane moving in a ( D + 2 ) -dimensional spacetime in light-cone parametrization.
In this paper, we consider a class of equations of state that interpolate between standard fluids at high energy densities and Chaplygin gas fluids at low energy densities. We call this type of equation of state the “modified” Chaplygin gas. In the next section, we study the behavior of this modified Chaplygin gas and show that at large cosmological scales it could account for the current observations of the acceleration of the universe. In Section 3, we investigate the possibility of using Sen’s [12,13,14] idea of a rolling tachyon to describe the current acceleration of the present epoch where the tachyon fluid is considered as a candidate for the modified Chaplygin gas equation of state.

2. Modified Chaplygin Gas

Within the framework of FRW, we study a model based on (modified) Chaplygin gas where our principal assumption is that the energy density ρ and pressure p are related by the following equation of state:
p = A ρ B ρ n , n 1
where A and B positive constants.
We see that when B = 0 , it reduces to the standard equation of state of perfect fluid,
p = A ρ
whereas when A = 0 , it corresponds to an exotic background fluid, Chaplygin gas, described by an equation of state:
p = B ρ , for n = 1
In (1), the two terms start to be of the same order when the pressure vanishes (i.e., p = 0 ). In this case, the fluid has pressureless density ρ 0 , corresponding to some cosmological scale a 0 ,
ρ 0 = ρ n + 1 ( a 0 ) = B A
Now we consider a D-dimensional FRW spacetime with scale factor a ( t ) and metric:
d s 2 = d t 2 + a 2 ( t ) d Ω k 2
where d Ω k 2 is the metric of the maximally symmetric ( D 1 ) -space with curvature k, for k = 1 , 0 , + 1 .
If this space time is filled with a fluid of energy density ρ and pressure p, then conservation of energy momentum tensor μ T μ ν = 0 , gives,
ρ ˙ + ( D 1 ) H ( ρ + p ) = 0
The Friedmann equation for the scale factor a is,
H 2 = a ˙ a 2 = 2 ρ ( D 1 ) ( D 2 ) k a 2
These two equations imply that:
a ¨ a = H ˙ + H 2 = ( D 1 ) p + ( D 3 ) ρ ( D 1 ) ( D 2 )
A solution to this equation is obtained as follows. We define W = a ( D 1 ) ( A + 1 ) and a rescaled density ρ ¯ = ρ W , then (6) becomes,
ρ ¯ ˙ B A + 1 W n W ˙ ρ ¯ n = 0
The latter has a solution of the form:
ρ ¯ n + 1 n + 1 = B A + 1 W n + 1 n + 1 + C n + 1
where C is a constant of integration.
The density will be:
ρ = B A + 1 + C W n + 1 1 n + 1
The constant of integration C can be expressed in terms of the cosmological scale a 0 , (i.e., W 0 = a 0 ( D 1 ) ( A + 1 ) ) where the fluid has vanishing pressure:
C = B A + 1 W 0 n + 1 A
The energy density ρ will be:
ρ = B A + 1 1 n + 1 1 + 1 A W 0 W n + 1 1 n + 1
We see that for a large values of the scale factor a, i.e., W > > W 0 , we get:
ρ B A + 1 1 n + 1 p B A + 1 1 n + 1 = ρ
which correspond to an empty universe with a cosmological constant B A + 1 1 n + 1 (i.e., a de Sitter space).
On the other hand, for small scale factor a, i.e., W < < W 0 , we get:
ρ C n + 1 W p A C n + 1 W = A ρ
which correspond to universe dominated by an equation of state p = A ρ . This shows that this model interpolates between a universe dominated by matter phase with equation of state p = A ρ and a de Sitter phase p ρ .
Moreover, expanding Equations (1) and (11) to the subleading terms at large cosmological constant, we obtain the following expressions for the energy and the pressure:
ρ B A + 1 1 n + 1 1 + 1 ( n + 1 ) A W 0 W n + 1 p B A + 1 1 n + 1 1 + A + n ( A + 1 ) ( n + 1 ) A W 0 W n + 1
These correspond to the mixture of a cosmological constant B A + 1 1 n + 1 and a type of matter described by an equation of state:
p = n + A ( n + 1 ) ρ
The equation of state parameter takes the form:
ω = p ρ = 1 W 0 W n + 1 1 + 1 A W 0 W n + 1
which ranges over 1 < ω < A , depending on the cosmological scale a,
ω = 1 for W W 0 ω = 0 for W = W 0 ω = A for W W 0
The speed of sound c s is defined as,
c s 2 = δ p δ ρ = p ˙ ρ ˙
Now by computing ω ˙ , we obtain:
ω ˙ = c s 2 ω ρ ˙ ρ
It gives the following expression for the speed of sound:
c s 2 = ω + ρ d ω d ρ = n + A ( n + 1 ) + W 0 W n + 1 1 + 1 A W 0 W n + 1
which implies that c s 2 is always positive and hence there is no concern about imaginary speed of sound.
Moreover it has the following asymptotic limit,
c s 2 = n + A ( n + 1 ) for W W 0 c s 2 = A ( n + 1 ) for W = W 0 c s 2 = A for W W 0
The speed of sound never exceeds that of light for smaller scale a (i.e., W) or of the order of the scale a 0 where the pressure vanishes, provided that A < 1 n + 1 and will exceed it for large scale compared to a 0 .
A way to describe this cosmological model from field theoretical point of view is to introduce a scalar field ϕ and self-interacting potential U ( ϕ ) with the following Lagrangian [15,16]:
L ϕ = ϕ ˙ 2 2 U ( ϕ ) .
The energy momentum tensor contributed by the scalar field ϕ is identical to a fluid with energy density ρ ϕ and pressure p ϕ given by:
ρ ϕ = ϕ ˙ 2 2 + U ( ϕ ) = ρ p ϕ = ϕ ˙ 2 2 U ( ϕ ) = A ρ B ρ n .
It follows that:
ϕ ˙ 2 = ( 1 + ω ϕ ) ρ ϕ U ( ϕ ) = 1 2 ( 1 ω ϕ ) ρ ϕ
Now since ϕ ˙ = ϕ W ˙ where the prime denotes derivation with respect to W and W ˙ = ( D 1 ) ( A + 1 ) H W , we get:
ϕ 2 = D 2 2 ( D 1 ) ( A + 1 ) 2 1 + ω W 2
Here we have used (7) for the Hubble constant and guided by the cosmic microwave background CMB data which is strongly consistent with a flat universe, we have restricted ourselves to the flat case k = 0 .
A use of (18) for n = 1 , gives:
ϕ = D 2 2 ( D 1 ) A ( A + 1 ) W 0 W 2 1 + 1 A W 0 W 2 U ϕ = 1 2 B A + 1 1 2 2 + 1 A A W 0 W 2 1 + 1 A W 0 W 2
The first equation can be integrated easily which gives:
A W W 0 2 = 4 e 2 α ϕ 1 e 2 α ϕ 2 = 1 s h 2 ( α ϕ )
where α = 2 ( A + 1 ) ( D 1 ) D 2 .
We note that for larger scales (i.e., W W 0 ), the scalar vanishes (i.e., ϕ = 0 ) and becomes infinite (i.e., ϕ + ) for small scales ( W W 0 ).
Finally, by substituting the latter expression in our previous equations, we can write all our physical quantities ρ ϕ , p ϕ and ω ϕ in terms of the scalar field ϕ as,
ρ ϕ = B A + 1 1 2 cosh ( α ϕ ) p ϕ = B A + 1 1 2 A cosh ( α ϕ ) A + 1 cosh ( α ϕ ) ω ϕ = 1 A sinh 2 ( α ϕ ) cosh 2 ( α ϕ )
Notice that these physical quantities do not depend on the intermediate constant W 0 (i.e., constant of integration C).
Finally, we get the following potential which has a simple form:
U ( ϕ ) = 1 2 B A + 1 1 / 2 1 + A cosh ( α ϕ ) + ( 1 A ) cosh ( α ϕ )

3. Rolling Tachyon

Recently, some works have appeared in the literature which study the tachyon field cosmology [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. These follow from Sen’s [12,13] idea which suggests that the tachyon condensate of string theory in a gravitational background may be described by an effective field theory with an action of the form:
S = d D x g R V ( T ) 1 + g μ ν μ T ν T
where T is the tachyon field, V ( T ) is the tachyon potential and g μ ν is the FRW metric spacetime. The tachyon potential V ( T ) has two extremal points. The extremal point T = 0 is a maximum with V ( T = 0 ) = V 0 as the tension of some unstable bosonic D-brane and the extremal point T T 0 is a minimum where the potential vanishes.
The energy momentum tensor is:
T μ ν = 2 δ S g δ g μ ν = V ( T ) 1 + g μ ν μ T ν T g μ ν + V ( T ) μ T ν T 1 + g μ ν μ T ν T = p T g μ ν + p T + ρ T u μ u ν
where the 4-velocity u μ is:
u μ = μ T g μ ν μ T ν T
with u μ u μ = 1 .
Then the energy density ρ T and the pressure p T of the tachyon field which we consider homogeneous but time dependent is (i.e., i T = 0 ),
ρ T = V ( T ) 1 T ˙ 2 p T = V ( T ) 1 T ˙ 2
The condition of accelerating universe (i.e., a ¨ a > 0 ) requires that:
T ˙ 2 < 2 D 1
Then the equation of state parameter is:
ω T = p T ρ T = 1 T ˙ 2
Now consider the pressure p ϕ = ϕ ˙ 2 2 U ( ϕ ) and the energy density ρ ϕ = ϕ ˙ 2 2 + U ( ϕ ) for the scalar field that describes the modified Chaplygin gas for the case n = 1 and rewrite them as:
p ϕ = U ( ϕ ) 1 ϕ ˙ 2 2 U ( ϕ ) ρ ϕ = U ( ϕ ) 1 + ϕ ˙ 2 2 U ( ϕ )
In the approximation ϕ ˙ 2 U ( ϕ ) 1 , the above pressure and energy density can expressed in the following form:
p ϕ U ( ϕ ) 1 ϕ ˙ 2 U ( ϕ ) ρ ϕ U ( ϕ ) 1 ϕ ˙ 2 U ( ϕ )
Mapping the pressure p ϕ and energy density ρ ϕ for the scalar field in this approximation with the corresponding tachyon field p T and ρ T (35), we obtain that:
T ˙ 2 = ϕ ˙ 2 U ( ϕ ) = 2 p ϕ + ρ ϕ ρ ϕ p ϕ V ( T ) = U ( ϕ ) = 1 2 ρ ϕ p ϕ
It follows then that:
T ˙ = 2 p ϕ + ρ ϕ ρ ϕ p ϕ = 2 1 + ω ϕ 1 ω ϕ
We see that the above approximation ϕ ˙ 2 U ( ϕ ) 1 is valid only when ω ϕ 1 3 . It implies that the fluid with pressure p ϕ and energy density ρ ϕ has an equation of state p ϕ 1 3 ρ ϕ which can describe the current observations of accelerating universe. Moreover for large values of the scale factor W W 0 (i.e., ϕ 0 ), T ˙ = 0 which corresponds to ω T = 1 .
Equation (41) can be rewritten as:
T ˙ = D 2 ( D 1 ) ( 1 ω ϕ 2 ) ρ ϕ ˙ ρ ϕ 3 / 2
where we have used Equations (6) and (7).
Then the tachyon field T can be found in terms of the energy density ρ ϕ for the scalar field as:
T = D 2 D 1 d ρ ϕ 1 ω ϕ 2 ρ ϕ 3 / 2
An approximate solution to this integral can be found by replacing ω ϕ with its mean value < ω ϕ >,
T D 2 ( D 1 ) ( 1 < ω ϕ > 2 ) d ρ ϕ ρ ϕ 3 / 2 = 2 D 2 ( D 1 ) ( 1 < ω ϕ > 2 ) 1 ρ ϕ
This means that:
ρ ϕ 4 D 2 ( D 1 ) ( 1 < ω ϕ > 2 ) 1 T 2
and the potential V ( T ) for the tachyon field can be expressed as,
V ( T ) = 1 2 ρ ϕ p ϕ = 1 2 ( 1 A ) ρ ϕ + B ρ ϕ 1 2 4 ( 1 A ) ( D 2 ) ( D 1 ) ( 1 < ω ϕ > 2 ) 1 T 2 + B ( D 1 ) ( 1 < ω ϕ > 2 ) 4 ( D 2 ) T 2
Even though the tachyonic potential V ( T ) has different form than the scalar potential U ( ϕ ) . They lead to the same cosmological evolution that is: an accelerated expansion for the universe.
This was made possible because of the mapping that exists between normal scalar field ϕ with potential U ( ϕ ) and tachyonic field T with potential V ( T ) .
Before we close, we remark that the mapping between scalar field ϕ and tachyon field T which is valid for small gradient T ˙ 2 = ϕ ˙ 2 U ( ϕ ) 1 , suggests that the tachyonic Lagrangian (which is the pressure in this case),
p T = V ( T ) 1 T ˙ 2 V ( T ) ( 1 T ˙ 2 2 )
is identical to the k–essence Lagrangian [26,27,28], p k ( T , T ˙ 2 2 ) = V ( T ) p ˜ ( T ˙ 2 2 ) .
This implies that the mapping between ϕ and T can be reinterpreted now as a mapping between normal scalar field ϕ and k–essence field.

4. Conclusions

We have considered an exotic fluid and studied its cosmological implications. Such an exotic fluid obeys an equation of state, we called it “modified Chaplygin” equation of state, which has some interesting properties.
It has been shown here that this “modified Chaplygin” gas of state describes the evolution of a universe from a phase dominated by an equation of state p = A ρ for small values of the scale cosmological factor to a phase dominated by a cosmological constant B A + 1 1 n + 1 for large values of the scale factor.
We have then described this “modified Chaplygin” gas as FRW cosmological model having a scalar field and found its self-interacting potential.
Furthermore, we have discussed the cosmological evolution of the tachyon field in gravitational background to drive the accelerated expansion of the universe and obtained a mapping between a normal scalar field with its potential and a tachyonic field with its corresponding potential.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Perlmutter, S.; Aldering, G.; Deustua, S.; Fabbro, S.; Goldhaber, G.; Groom, D.E.; Kim, A.G.; Kim, M.Y.; Knop, R.A.; Nugent, P.; et al. Cosmology from Type Ia Supernovae. Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 1997, 29, 1351. [Google Scholar]
  2. Perlmutter, S.; Aldering, G.; Goldhaber, G.; Gerson, K.; Knop, R.A.; Nugent, P.; Castro, P.G.; Deustua, S.; Fabbro, S.; Goobar, A.; et al. Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae. Astrophys. J. 1999, 517, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Riess, A.G.; Filippenko, A.V.; Challis, P.; Clocchiatti, A.; Diercks, A.; Garnavich, P.M.; Gillil, R.L.; Hogan, C.J.; Jha, S.; Kirshner, R.P.; et al. Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant. Astron. J. 1998, 116, 1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Garnavich, P.M.; Kirshner, R.P.; Challis, P.; Tonry, J.; Gillil, R.L.; Smith, R.C.; Clocchiatti, A.; Diercks, A.; Filippenko, A.V.; Hamuy, M.; et al. Constraints on cosmological models from Hubble Space Telescope observations of high-z supernovae. Astrophys. J. 1998, 493, L53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Schmidt, B.P.; Suntzeff, N.B.; Phillips, M.M.; Schommer, R.A.; Clocchiatti, A.; Kirshner, R.P.; Garnavich, P.; Challis, P.; Leibundgut, B.; Spyromilio, J.; et al. The High-Z Supernova Search: Measuring Cosmic Deceleration and Global Curvature of the Universe Using Type Ia Supernovae. Astrophys. J. 1998, 507, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kamenshchik, A.Y.; Moschella, U.; Pasquier, V. An alternative to quintessence. Phys. Lett. 2001, B511, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Ogawa, N. Remark on the classical solution of the Chaplygin gas as d-branes. Phys. Rev. 2000, D62, 085023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Kamenshchik, A.Y.; Moschella, U.; Pasquier, V. Chaplygin-like gas and branes in black hole bulks. Phys. Lett. 2000, B487, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Bilić, N.; Tupper, G.B.; Viollier, R.D. Unification of dark matter and dark energy: The inhomogeneous Chaplygin gas. Phys. Lett. 2002, B535, 17–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Bento, M.C.; Bertolami, O.; Sen, A.A. Generalized Chaplygin Gas, Accelerated Expansion and Dark Energy-Matter Unification. Phys. Rev. 2002, D66, 043507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Fabris, J.C.; Goncalves, S.V.B.; De Souza, P.E. Mass Power Spectrum in a Universe Dominated by the Chaplygin Gas. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 2002, 43, 2111–2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Sen, A. Rolling Tachyon. J. High Energy Phys. 2002, 2002, 048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sen, A. Tachyon Matter. J. High Energy Phys. 2002, 2002, 056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Sen, A. Field Theory of Tachyon Matter. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 2002, 17, 1797–1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Barrow, J.D. Graduated inflationary universes. Phys. Lett. 1990, B235, 40–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Barrow, J.D.; Saich, P. Scalar-field cosmologies. Class. Quantum Grav. 1993, 10, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Padmanabhan, T. Accelerated expansion of the universe driven by tachyonic matter. Phys. Rev. 2002, D66, 021301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Gibbons, A.W. Cosmological Evolution of the Rolling Tachyon. Phys. Lett. 2002, B537, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Fairbian, M.; Tytgat, M.H.G. Inflation from a Tachyon Fluid? Phys. Lett. 2002, B546, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Mukhoyama, S. Brane cosmological driven by the rolling tachyon. Phys. Rev. 2002, D66, 024009. [Google Scholar]
  21. Feinstein, A. Power-Law Inflation from the Rolling Tachyon. Phys. Rev. 2002, D66, 063511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Frolov, A.; Kofman, L.; Starobinsky, A.A. Prospects and problems of tachyon matter cosmology. Phys. Lett. 2002, B545, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Choudhury, D.; Ghoshal, D.; Jatkar, D.P.; Panda, S. On the cosmological relevance of the tachyon. Phys. Lett. 2002, B544, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Li, X.; Hao, J.; Liu, D. Can quintessence be the rolling tachyon? Chin. Phys. Lett. 2002, 19, 1584. [Google Scholar]
  25. Shiu, G.; Wasserman, I. Cosmological constraints on tachyon matter. Phys. Lett. 2002, B541, 6–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Armendariz-Picon, C.; Mukhanov, V.; Steinhardt, P.J. Essentials of k-essence. Phys. Rev. 2001, 63, 103510. [Google Scholar]
  27. Armendariz-Picon, C.; Damour, T.; Mukhanov, V. k-Inflation. Phys. Lett. 1999, B458, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Chiba, T.; Okabe, T.; Yamaguchi, M. Kinetically driven quintessence. Phys. Rev. 2000, D62, 023511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Benaoum, H. Accelerated Universe from Modified Chaplygin Gas and Tachyonic Fluid. Universe 2022, 8, 340. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8070340

AMA Style

Benaoum H. Accelerated Universe from Modified Chaplygin Gas and Tachyonic Fluid. Universe. 2022; 8(7):340. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8070340

Chicago/Turabian Style

Benaoum, Hachemi. 2022. "Accelerated Universe from Modified Chaplygin Gas and Tachyonic Fluid" Universe 8, no. 7: 340. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8070340

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop