Modeling a Logistics Hub Using the Digital Footprint Method—The Implication for Open Innovation Engineering
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Foundations and Methodology
2.1. Literature Review
2.2. Problem Statement
2.3. Method of Research
2.4. Mathematical Modeling of Goods and Cargo Flows
3. Results
3.1. Experience-Oriented Solutions. Huawei History
3.2. Huawei Business Status
3.3. Huawei Perspective, Mission and Strategy
3.4. Company Management System
- constant innovations, consumer-oriented and based on their needs and technological leadership, for creation of sure-fire ecosystem;
- risk control for business continuity;
- maintaining corporate social responsibility and achieving sustainable social development.
3.5. Mathematical Model of DC Operation
3.6. Calculation Example
3.7. Practical Calculation on a Computer Using Mathematical Modeling
4. Discussion
4.1. Discussion: A logistics Hub Using the Digital Footprint Method
4.2. Discussion: Open Innovation Engineering from the Digital Footprint Method
- -
- Open innovation engineering: Preliminary study on new entrance of technology to market;
- -
- Open R&D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon;
- -
- Open innovation and serial entrepreneurs;
- -
- The fit between firms’ open innovation and business model for new product development speed: a contingency perspective;
- -
- Bringing open innovation to services;
- -
- Open innovation in value networks.
- (a)
- how central firms choose between different governance modes when they establish relations with partners;
- (b)
- studying value constellations being a nexus for the integration of different theoretical perspectives since they are a nexus where value creation, non-arm’s-length transactions, external resource sourcing and inter-organizational networking are welded together;
- (c)
- analyzing Open Innovation at different levels and that interorganizational networks.
5. Conclusions
- -
- Formalize the characteristics of the stochastic flow of goods and cargo through the logistics hub.
- -
- Assess the parameters of the two main cross-docking and pick-by-line technologies in cargo handling.
5.1. Advantages of the Enterprise
5.2. Disadvantages of the Enterprise
5.3. Model Implementation
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Provotorov, V.V.; Sergeev, S.M.; Part, A.A. Solvability of hyperbolic systems with distributed parameters on the graph in the weak formulation. Vestn. St. Peterbg. Univ. Prikl. Mat. Inform. Protsessy Upr. 2019, 15, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- de Palma, A.; Picard, N.; de Lapparent, M. Risk and Uncertainty in Urban and Transport Economics. Math. Popul. Stud. 2015, 22, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borisoglebskaya, L.N.; Provotorov, V.V.; Sergeev, S.M.; Kosinov, E.S. Mathematical aspects of optimal control of transference processes in spatial networks. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 537, 042025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lukashevich, N.; Svirina, A.; Garanin, D. Multilevel prognosis of logistics chains in case of uncertainty: Information and statistical technologies implementation. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2018, 4, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ali, M.; Miller, L. ERP system implementation in large enterprises—A systematic literature review. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 2017, 30, 666–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krasnov, S.; Sergeev, S.; Titov, A.; Zotova, Y. Modelling of digital communication surfaces for products and services promotion. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 497, 012032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faber, N.; De Koster, R.B.M.; Smidts, A. Survival of the fittest: The impact of fit between warehouse management structure and warehouse context on warehouse performance. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 56, 120–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borisoglebskaya, L.N.; Provotorova, E.N.; Sergeev, S.M.; Khudyakov, A.P. Automated storage and retrieval system for Industry 4.0 concept. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 537, 032036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yun, J.J.; Kim, D.; Yan, M.R. Open innovation engineering—Preliminary study on new entrance of technology to market. Electronics 2020, 9, 791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vohra, R.V. Mechanism Design: A Linear Programming Approach; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2011; ISBN 9781107004368. [Google Scholar]
- Williams, K.C. The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Edited by John H. Kagel and Alvin E. Roth. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995. 721p. $55.00. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 1996, 90, 632–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, V.L. Experimental Economics: Induced Value Theory. Pap. Exp. Econ. 2010, 100–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yun, J.J. Introduction BT—Business Model Design Compass: Open Innovation Funnel to Schumpeterian New Combination Business Model Developing Circle; Yun, J.J., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2017; pp. 3–14. ISBN 978-981-10-4128-0. [Google Scholar]
- Christensen, J.F.; Olesen, M.H.; Kjær, J.S. The industrial dynamics of Open Innovation—Evidence from the transformation of consumer electronics. Res. Policy 2005, 34, 1533–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borisoglebskaya, L.N.; Provotorova, E.N.; Sergeev, S.M. Promotion based on digital interaction algorithm. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 537, 042032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maganha, I.; Silva, C.; Ferreira, L.M.D.F. The layout design in reconfigurable manufacturing systems: A literature review. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 105, 683–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sergeev, S.; Kirillova, T.; Krasyuk, I. Modelling of sustainable development of megacities under limited resources. E3S Web Conf. 2019, 91, 5007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baruffaldi, G.; Accorsi, R.; Manzini, R. Warehouse management system customization and information availability in 3pl companies. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2019, 119, 251–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, G.; Gunasekaran, A.; Ngai, E.W.T. Distribution network design with big data: Model and analysis. Ann. Oper. Res. 2018, 270, 539–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, K.W.; Inman, R.A.; Sower, V.E.; Zelbst, P.J. Comprehensive supply chain management model. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2019, 24, 590–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alcaraz, J.L.G.; Macías, A.A.M.; Luevano, D.J.P.; Fernández, J.B.; López, A.D.J.G.; Macías, E.J. Main benefits obtained from a successful JIT implementation. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2016, 86, 2711–2722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krasnov, S.; Sergeev, S.; Zotova, E.; Grashchenko, N. Algorithm of optimal management for the efficient use of energy resources. E3S Web Conf. 2019, 110, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benrqya, Y. Costs and benefits of using cross-docking in the retail supply chain. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag. 2019, 47, 412–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krasnov, S.; Zotova, E.; Sergeev, S.; Krasnov, A.; Draganov, M. Stochastic algorithms in multimodal 3PL segment for the digital environment. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 618, 012069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rybakov, D.S. Total cost optimisation model for logistics systems of trading companies. Int. J. Logist. Syst. Manag. 2017, 27, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shcherbakov, V.V.; Silkina, G.Y. Information Toolkit for Digital Transformation of Economy and Management. Econ. Entrep. 2017, 5–1, 1090–1096. [Google Scholar]
- Silkina, G.Y. ICT Markets: Innovative Activity and Susceptibility to Innovation. Econ. Entrep. 2016, 7, 55–61. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, H.; Dong, Z.; Li, G.; Zhao, H. Joint Advertisement and Trade-In Marketing Strategy in Closed-Loop Supply Chain. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Silkina, G. From analogue to digital tools of business control: Succession and transformation. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 497, 012018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stein Dani, V.; Dal Sasso Freitas, C.M.; Thom, L.H. Ten years of visualization of business process models: A systematic literature review. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 2019, 66, 103347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geissdoerfer, M.; Morioka, S.N.; de Carvalho, M.M.; Evans, S. Business models and supply chains for the circular economy. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 190, 712–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shvetsova, O.A.; Rodionova, E.A.; Epstein, M.Z. Evaluation of investment projects under uncertainty: Multi-criteria approach using interval data. Entrep. Sustain. Issues 2018, 5, 914–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schislyaeva, E.; Saychenko, O.; Barykin, S.; Kapustina, I. International Energy Strategies Projects of Magnetic Levitation Transport. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing; Springer: Cham, Germany, 2019; Volume 983, pp. 313–320. ISBN 9783030198671. [Google Scholar]
- Ilin, I.; Kalinina, O.; Barykin, S. Financial logistics innovations in IT Project Management. Matec Web Conf. 2018, 193, 5062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vilken, V.; Kalinina, O.; Barykin, S.; Zotova, E. Logistic methodology of development of the regional digital economy. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 497, 12037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bril, A.; Kalinina, O.; Levina, A. Two-stage commercial evaluation of engineering systems production projects for high-rise buildings. E3S Web Conf. 2018, 33, 3004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bril, A.; Kalinina, O.; Valebnikova, O. Innovation Venture Financing Projects in Information Technology. In Internet of Things, Smart Spaces, and Next Generation Networks and Systems; Galinina, O., Balandin, S., Koucheryavy, Y., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switherlands, 2016; Volume 9870, pp. 766–775, ISBN 9783319463001; ISBN 9783319463018. [Google Scholar]
- Carayannis, E.G.; Campbell, D.F.J. “Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 2009, 46, 201–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Etzkowitz, H.; Leydesdorff, L. The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Res. Policy 2000, 29, 109–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leydesdorff, L. The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix,..., and an N-Tuple of Helices: Explanatory Models for Analyzing the Knowledge-Based Economy? J. Knowl. Econ. 2012, 3, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Carayannis, E.G.; Barth, T.D.; Campbell, D.F. The Quintuple Helix innovation model: Global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. J. Innov. Entrep. 2012, 1, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Park, H.W. Transition from the Triple Helix to N-Tuple Helices? An interview with Elias, G. Carayannis and David, F.J. Campbell. Scientometrics 2014, 99, 203–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Global 500. Available online: https://fortune.com/global500/2017/search/?hqcountry=China (accessed on 27 October 2013).
- Nikolaeva, I.G.; Rudakova, E.N.; Dmitrieva, O.A.; Vlasov, A.V.; Morkovkin, D.E. Digitalization of the EAEU Transport and Logistics Sector and Its Role in Improving the Euro-Asian Cargo Transportation. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Culture, Education and Economic Development of Modern Society (ICCESE 2020), Moscow, Russia, 13–14 March 2020; Volume 416, pp. 1296–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koroleva, E.; Sokolov, S.; Filatova, E. Digitalization as a method of implementation EEU transit potential. E3S Web Conf. 2019, 138, 02003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barykin, S.Y.; Kapustina, I.V.; Kirillova, T.V.; Yadykin, V.K.; Konnikov, Y.A. Economics of Digital Ecosystems. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex 2020, 6, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barykin, S.Y.; Kapustina, I.V.; Sergeev, S.M.; Yadykin, V.K. Algorithmic foundations of economic and mathematical modeling of network logistics processes. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2020, 6, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Litvinenko, V.S. Digital Economy as a Factor in the Technological Development of the Mineral Sector. Nat. Resour. Res. 2020, 29, 1521–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agrawal, V.V.; Atasu, A.; Van Wassenhove, L.N. New opportunities for operations management research in sustainability. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 2019, 21, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayaganova, M.; Pritvorova, T.; Mamrayeva, D.; Tashenova, L. Social entrepreneurship: Business models and strategies for their development. Econ. Ann. Xxi 2019, 178, 96–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vynaryk, V.; Hanley, A. Effects of the QMS ISO 9000 Certification on Russian Manufacturing Companies. SSRN Electron. J. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- ISO. The ISO Survey of Management System Standard Certifications—2012. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/54534.html (accessed on 27 October 2013).
- Snihur, Y.; Wiklund, J. Searching for innovation: Product, process, and business model innovations and search behavior in established firms. Long Range Plan. 2019, 52, 305–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laureani, A.; Antony, J. Leadership and Lean Six Sigma: A systematic literature review. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 2019, 30, 53–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erkut, B. The emergence of the ERP software market between product innovation and market shaping. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2018, 4, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Torkkeli, M.T.; Kock, C.J.; Salmi, P.A.S. The “open innovation” paradigm: A contingency perspective. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. 2009, 2, 176–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teece, D.J. Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Plan. 2010, 43, 172–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Souto, J.E. Business model innovation and business concept innovation as the context of incremental innovation and radical innovation. Tour. Manag. 2015, 51, 142–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chesbrough, H.; Vanhaverbeke, W.; West, J. Chapter 13 Open Innovation in Value Networks. In Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm; Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., West, J., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Gay, B. Open innovation, networking, and business model dynamics: The two sides. J. Innov. Entrep. 2014, 3, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sales revenue | 239,025 | 288,197 | 395,009 | 521,574 | 609,621 |
Operating revenue | 239,025 | 288,197 | 395,009 | 47,515 | 5638 |
Operating margin | 12.2% | 11.9% | 11.6% | 9.1% | 9.3% |
Margin of profit | 21,003 | 27,866 | 36,910 | 37,052 | 47,455 |
Operating cash flow | 22,554 | 41,755 | 52,300 | 49,218 | 96,336 |
Financial resources and short-range investments | 81,944 | 106,036 | 125,208 | 145,653 | 199,943 |
Operative expenses | 75,180 | 78,566 | 89,019 | 116,231 | 137,576 |
Total assets | 244,091 | 309,773 | 372,155 | 443,634 | 505,225 |
Total borrowings | 23,033 | 28,108 | 28,986 | 44,799 | 39,925 |
Owned capital | 86,266 | 99,985 | 119,069 | 140,133 | 175,616 |
Assets and liabilities | 64.7% | 67.7% | 68.0% | 68.4% | 65.2% |
Penalty | A1 | A2 | A3 | A4 | A5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Limitation on stocks held in DC | r = 0 | 0 | 27.5 | 55 | 110 | 137.5 |
r = 1 | 0.42 | 23.3 | 46.2 | 92.1 | 115.1 | |
r = 2 | 1.2 | 20 | 38.7 | 76.2 | 95.2 | |
r = 3 | 2.5 | 17.55 | 32.51 | 62.53 | 77.6 | |
r = 4 | 4.19 | 15.8 | 27.51 | 50.83 | 62.55 | |
r = 5 | 6.25 | 15.3 | 23.75 | 41.25 | 50.1 | |
r = 6 | 8.75 | 15.1 | 21.29 | 33.71 | 40.3 | |
r = 7 | 11.67 | 15.83 | 20.21 | 28.33 | 32.50 | |
r = 8 | 15 | 17.5 | 20.7 | 25.3 | 27.51 | |
r = 9 | 18.75 | 20.1 | 21.2 | 23.7 | 25.4 | |
r = 10 | 22.92 | 23.33 | 23.75 | 24.58 | 25.02 | |
r = 11 | 27.51 | 27.51 | 27.51 | 27.51 | 27.51 | |
r = 12 | 32.54 | 32.54 | 32.54 | 32.54 | 32.54 | |
min expenses | 0 | 14.2 | 18.6 | 21.1 | 22.3 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Shmatko, A.; Barykin, S.; Sergeev, S.; Thirakulwanich, A. Modeling a Logistics Hub Using the Digital Footprint Method—The Implication for Open Innovation Engineering. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010059
Shmatko A, Barykin S, Sergeev S, Thirakulwanich A. Modeling a Logistics Hub Using the Digital Footprint Method—The Implication for Open Innovation Engineering. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2021; 7(1):59. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010059
Chicago/Turabian StyleShmatko, Alexey, Sergey Barykin, Sergey Sergeev, and Anuphat Thirakulwanich. 2021. "Modeling a Logistics Hub Using the Digital Footprint Method—The Implication for Open Innovation Engineering" Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 7, no. 1: 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010059