Next Article in Journal
Arts catalyst of creative organisations for the fourth industrial revolution
Previous Article in Journal
Implementing open innovation concept in social business
 
 
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity is published by MDPI from Volume 4 Issue 2 (2018). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Springer.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A case study on the improvement of institution of “High-Risk High-Return R&D” in Korea

by
Byung Yong Hwang
1,*,
Hee Ju Jun
1,
Mee Hyang Chang
2 and
Dae Cheol Kim
3
1
Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning, Seoul, Republic of Korea
2
Sejong University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
3
School of Business, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2017, 3(3), 19; https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-017-0069-9
Submission received: 17 August 2017 / Accepted: 5 September 2017 / Published: 29 September 2017

Abstract

Despite the increase of government spending on R&D in South Korea, there have been limits in enhancing the challenging trait and creativity of research outcomes. A new approach to the current mode of R&D is considered necessary to tackle this problem. In 2015, South Korea operated fifteen programs, namely “High-risk Highreturn R&D,” from seven government ministries. The purpose of this study is to examine the actual conditions for adoption and to further promote early establishment and wide implementation of the new “High-risk High-return policy” in National R&D, and to suggest ways to improve it. In this study, we have approached the case with a life-cycle perspective of planmanagement- evaluation of R&D by carrying out a survey and unstandardized interviews with key staff from R&D management agencies. Based on the results of the analysis, we suggest improvements in three aspects: 1) flexible system operation, 2) government ministries’ autonomy and accountability, 3) effective incentives. Finally, we discuss possible improvements, future directions, and the limits of this study.
Keywords: National R&D program, High-risk high-return R&D, Life-cycle perspective, R&D performance National R&D program, High-risk high-return R&D, Life-cycle perspective, R&D performance

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hwang, B.Y.; Jun, H.J.; Chang, M.H.; Kim, D.C. A case study on the improvement of institution of “High-Risk High-Return R&D” in Korea. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2017, 3, 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-017-0069-9

AMA Style

Hwang BY, Jun HJ, Chang MH, Kim DC. A case study on the improvement of institution of “High-Risk High-Return R&D” in Korea. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2017; 3(3):19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-017-0069-9

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hwang, Byung Yong, Hee Ju Jun, Mee Hyang Chang, and Dae Cheol Kim. 2017. "A case study on the improvement of institution of “High-Risk High-Return R&D” in Korea" Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 3, no. 3: 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-017-0069-9

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop