Next Article in Journal
Application of System Dynamics to Evaluate the Social and Economic Benefits of Infrastructure Projects
Next Article in Special Issue
On the Complexity of the Universal Order in Vico’s Establishing Principles
Previous Article in Journal
Assessing the Regional Innovation System’s Absorptive Capacity: The Approach of a Smart Region in a Small Country
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mongolia, Modernity, Systems + Solutions: Questing Holistic Design + Planning Strategies for a Brighter Tomorrow
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Systems 2017, 5(2), 28; doi:10.3390/systems5020028

Structure and Superstructures in Complex Social Systems

1
Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain
2
Institute of Education, Dublin City University, Dublin 9, Ireland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 9 December 2016 / Revised: 13 March 2017 / Accepted: 23 March 2017 / Published: 26 March 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Complex Social Systems: Theory And Practice)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [2271 KB, uploaded 29 March 2017]   |  

Abstract

In classical sociology, there is a sharp separation between the superstructure reflecting cultural ideals and the concrete Structural Base (SB). The authors hypothesize a Doxical Superstructure (DS) in its own space at a higher level, containing concepts such as completeness, necessity and possibility associated with abstract concepts like beliefs, ethics, knowledge, relations and science. The DS or image (DS-image) is defined as the “explanation” (for the Subject-agent) of the Structural Base. A Mythical Superstructure (MS) is defined as a third superstructure. An analysis is carried out on the Structural Base. Concepts or denotative significances (d-significances) are defined for SB deontic relations. Alethic properties (existence, completeness, possibility and necessity) and deontic properties (permission, obligation and choice) of deontic relations are introduced, defined, and examined in relation to the Ideological Doxical Superstructure (IDS), including Meinong objects (thoughts, feelings and desires). View Full-Text
Keywords: alethic components; belief; connotation; denotation; deontical components; ideology; image; projection; significance alethic components; belief; connotation; denotation; deontical components; ideology; image; projection; significance
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Nescolarde-Selva, J.A.; Usó-Doménech, J.L.; Gash, H. Structure and Superstructures in Complex Social Systems. Systems 2017, 5, 28.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Systems EISSN 2079-8954 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top