Apithology Systems Inquiry: Evaluation from a Generativist Ontology
AbstractThe ontological premise of a systems research philosophy raises some unique questions about research efficacy. The study of the relations between abstract objects in bounded contexts places systems inquiry into a specific research category. Different systems research paradigms deal with the question of research evaluation distinctively. This article examines the defining criteria for the evaluation of systems research within a generativist systems ontology. Three criteria to inform the design of generativist systems research are proposed. Their use is illustrated for the generativist systems research discipline of apithology. The proposed criteria of research validity, credibility and reliability generate a fourth criterion: systems research veracity. A heuristic for discerning the results of a generativist research design prior to its commencement is provided by an apithology triptych. The benefit of this approach is to enable the design of research of relevance, significance and importance that leads naturally to apithology systems research of consequence. View Full-Text
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Varey, W. Apithology Systems Inquiry: Evaluation from a Generativist Ontology. Systems 2017, 5, 22.
Varey W. Apithology Systems Inquiry: Evaluation from a Generativist Ontology. Systems. 2017; 5(1):22.Chicago/Turabian Style
Varey, Will. 2017. "Apithology Systems Inquiry: Evaluation from a Generativist Ontology." Systems 5, no. 1: 22.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.