Next Article in Journal
Gluconobacter Oxydans-Based MFC with PEDOT:PSS/Graphene/Nafion Bioanode for Wastewater Treatment
Next Article in Special Issue
Threonine Phosphorylation of an Electrochemical Peptide-Based Sensor to Achieve Improved Uranyl Ion Binding Affinity
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Progress of Triboelectric Nanogenerators for Biomedical Sensors: From Design to Application
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ratiometric Fluorescence Detection of Colorectal Cancer-Associated Exosomal miR-92a-3p with DSN-Assisted Signal Amplification by a MWCNTs@Au NCs Nanoplatform
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Disposable Electrochemical Biosensor Based on the Inhibition of Alkaline Phosphatase Encapsulated in Acrylamide Hydrogels

by
Yolanda Alacid
1,
Andrés F. Quintero Jaime
2,
María José Martínez-Tomé
1,
C. Reyes Mateo
1 and
Francisco Montilla
2,*
1
Instituto de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación en Biotecnología Sanitaria de Elche (IDiBE), Universidad Miguel Hernández, Avenida de la Universidad s/n, 03202 Elche, Spain
2
Departamento de Química Física and Instituto Universitario de Materiales de Alicante (IUMA), Universidad de Alicante, Carretera San Vicente s/n, 03690 Alicante, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biosensors 2022, 12(9), 698; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12090698
Submission received: 30 June 2022 / Revised: 9 August 2022 / Accepted: 26 August 2022 / Published: 29 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Electrochemistry and Spectroscopy-Based Biosensors)

Abstract

:
The present work describes the development of an easy-to-use portable electrochemical biosensor based on alkaline phosphatase (ALP) as a recognition element, which has been immobilized in acrylamide-based hydrogels prepared through a green protocol over disposable screen-printed electrodes. To carry out the electrochemical transduction, an electroinactive substrate (hydroquinone diphosphate) was used in the presence of the enzyme and then it was hydrolyzed to an electroactive species (hydroquinone). The activity of the protein within the matrix was determined voltammetrically. Due to the adhesive properties of the hydrogel, this was easily deposited on the surface of the electrodes, greatly increasing the sensitivity of the biosensor. The device was optimized to allow the determination of phosphate ion, a competitive inhibitor of ALP, in aqueous media. Our study provides a proof-of-concept demonstrating the potential use of the developed biosensor for in situ, real-time measurement of water pollutants that act as ALP inhibitors.

1. Introduction

Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) is a superfamily of very stable and inexpensive metalloenzymes abundantly present in nature. ALP belongs to the group of hydrolases and catalyses the cleavage of phosphoric acid esters releasing the corresponding alcohol and inorganic phosphate. Its active site is electrostatically flexible, with large polar surfaces, which satisfy the requirements for hydrolysis of a wide range of substrates [1]. This promiscuity in substrate recognition and consequently low biocatalytic selectivity, together with its abundance in nature and its physiological role of dephosphorylating compounds, have made ALP activity assessments one of the most widely performed enzyme assays today [2].
ALP is applied in chemical analysis for solving a wide variety of analytical problems. It can be used as a clinical biomarker, since changes in its catalytic activity can be related to pathological situations such as hepatitis, different bone diseases, prostate cancer, etc. It is also widely used in the design of immunosensors and biosensors, either for direct monitoring of analytes (substrates) or for indirect monitoring of inorganic and organic compounds (i.e., heavy metals, herbicides, pesticides, and different biologically active metabolites) which act as inhibitors [3,4,5,6,7]. This second approach is particularly suitable for the screening of drugs or for environmental applications when there is a need for rapid assessment of water quality and real-time warning of water quality decline.
The selection of the substrate for these analytical applications depends mainly on the type of transducer used. Examples of ALP substrates and ALP bioassays strategies include colorimetric, fluorometric, chemiluminescent, and electrochemical techniques among others [8]. Many of these sensing schemes often involve high economic and time costs, as they include several steps and the use of reactants, which can sometimes be very expensive and must be used in a laboratory by specialized personnel. However, for many of the above applications, simpler, cheaper, faster, and more portable devices are needed to enable urgent decisions to be made in real time.
The immobilization of ALP in these sensing devices has the advantage of ease of handling and the possibility of miniaturization, allowing in situ measurements. Silica matrices prepared by the sol–gel process are most often used to immobilize enzymes with very satisfactory results, especially in electrochemical and optical biosensor development [9,10,11]. This methodology has been used in the past to immobilize ALP to develop fluorescent biosensors capable of detecting enzyme inhibitors such as pesticides and phosphate [12,13]. Although the sol–gel process provides a versatile technology, with high biocompatibility and protective properties, one of its main limitations is the low flexibility and extreme fragility (easy breakage) of the matrices, which limits their manipulation, possible miniaturization, and their ability to adapt to any situation and application.
The use of organic hydrogels based on polyimide or methacrylate among other “soft materials” is presented as a very interesting alternative for the manufacture of sensory devices [14,15,16]. These polymeric materials are mechanically stronger and more flexible than sol–gel matrices and can easily accommodate a great number of enzymes, providing a highly aqueous and natural mimicking microenvironment that increases the stability of biomolecules and preserves their functionality [17,18]. In addition, depending on their composition, it is possible to modulate properties such as adhesion, permeability, transparency, degree of swelling, hydrophobicity, conductivity, etc., which makes them easily coupled to different transducers.
Disposable screen-printed electrodes (SPEs) are a convenient research platform for biosensing allowing rapid in situ detection [19,20]. They are usually made by covering a plastic or ceramic support with a conductive paste layer and are often modified with nanomaterials and biomolecules to enhance sensitivity and selectivity. Different electrochemical detection techniques such as chronoamperometry or cyclic voltammetry can be used for analysis; the latter allowing determination of the stability range of the biosensor and the redox processes present on the surface of the modified electrode. Despite the multiple applications of ALP, especially for detecting inhibitors, the modification of SPEs with this enzyme, compared to other enzymes and biomolecules, has been described much less frequently.
In the present work, we have developed an easy-to-use portable electrochemical biosensor based on ALP as a recognition element that can serve as a platform to detect water pollutants that act as ALP inhibitors. Using a green protocol, we have prepared an acrylate-based cationic hydrogel incorporating ALP (ALP@AETAC) that was synthesized directly on a disposable screen-printed carbon electrode. The working principle of the biosensor is based on the detection of hydroquinone, an electroactive species, the product of the hydrolysis reaction of hydroquinone diphosphate (that is non-electroactive) catalysed by ALP. The presence of ALP inhibitors, such as the phosphate ion, reduces the enzymatic activity resulting in a lower production of hydroquinone that can be detected with this device. The device was optimized to detect phosphate in water, a competitive inhibitor of ALP. The determination of this analyte is of great interest, both from a clinical and environmental point of view since variations in its concentrations can be associated with different pathologies and water qualities.

2. Experimental Part

2.1. Materials and Reagents

Enzyme alkaline phosphatase (ALP, E.C. 232-631-4 from bovine intestinal mucosa, lyophilized powder, ≥10 DEA units mg−1, PM 140 kDa), hydroquinone (HQ, ≥97%), [2-(acryloyloxy)ethyl]trimethyl-ammonium chloride (AETAC, 80% wt., 600 ppm monomethyl-ether hydroquinone as a stabilizer), N-N’-methylene-bis(acrylamide) (MBA, ≥99%), lithium phenyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphosphinate (LiTPO, ≥95%), and sodium phosphate dibasic (puriss. p.a.) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Merck Life Science, Madrid, Spain). Nitric acid (HNO3, 67–70%) from VMR, potassium nitrate (KNO3, ≥99%), and tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Trizma, 99.9%) were used to prepare the buffer solution (0.1 M Trizma, the pH was adjusted to 8.4 by adding nitric acid). Hydroquinone diphosphate (HQ2P), used as enzymatic substrate for the alkaline phosphatase and screen-printed carbon electrodes (SPE, Ref: DRP-C110, geometric area of the working electrode 0.126 cm2), were obtained from Metrohm DropSens. All the solutions were prepared using ultrapure water (18 MΩ cm, Merck Millipore® Milli-Q® water, Spain).

2.2. Synthesis of ALP@AETAC Hydrogels-Based Electrochemical Biosensor

AETAC hydrogels were synthesized following the slightly modified protocol previously described by Martín-Pacheco et al. [21]. In a typical experiment, 5.66 mL of AETAC (26.4 mmol) and 0.1 g of the crosslinking agent MBA (0.06 mmol) were added to 5 mL of ultrapure water. Finally, the photoinitiator LiTPO (0.02 g, 0.06 mmol) was added to the monomer mixture and the sample was homogenized by gentle agitation in dark conditions for 1 min. For the immobilization of the ALP into the hydrogel, a buffer solution containing the enzyme was mixed with the hydrogel solution in a volume ratio of 1:1 before the crosslinking. For this study, a different concentration of ALP was evaluated, being 6 µM as the optimal enzyme concentration [13].
Before the preparation of the biosensor, the SPE electrode was sonicated in a mixture of ethanol: water (1:1 volume ratio) for 30 min and let dry. Then, a 5 µL-drop of the hydrogel precursor solution (in the absence or presence of the protein) was deposited onto the carbon working electrode of the SPE. Then, the modified electrode was irradiated for 1 min under UV light (λ = 335 nm) to initiate the photopolymerization. Scheme 1 depicts the stepwise biosensor fabrication.
Therefore, the hydrogel layer is generated in situ on the working electrode, coating it. The adhesion of the matrix to the support is evidenced in the images shown in the Supplementary Information (Figure S1) and in that included in Scheme 1.

2.3. Electrochemical Measurements

Electrochemical measurements were carried out using an eDAQ Potentiostat (EA163 model) coupled to a wave generator (EG&G Parc Model 175) and the data acquisition was performed with an eDAQ e-corder 410 unit (eDAQ Chart and Scope Software, ES500, Denistone East, Australia). For the electroanalytical and ALP activity measurements, the carbon working-electrode was modified with the 5 µL of the mixture ALP and hydrogel. On top of the hydrogel, a drop volume of 100 µL of trizma buffer solution was added to the electrode surface. Before the addition of the substrate, all the ALP@AETAC-modified electrodes were stabilized by voltammetric cycling between −0.6 and 0.6 V in the buffer solution. Then, an aliquot of the substrate, HQ2P, was added to the drop cell to attain a final concentration of 0.5 mM. For phosphate sensing, the ALP@AETAC-modified electrodes were stabilized in a 100 μL drop in absence of the substrate, followed by continuous addition of different concentrations of phosphate ions up to 10 mM.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Electrochemical Characterization of AETAC and ALP@AETAC-Modified Electrode

Figure 1 shows the stabilized cyclic voltammograms of a bare SPE electrode and an AETAC-modified electrode in 0.1 M trizma buffer solution (pH = 8.4) in the absence and presence of 1 mM HQ at a scan rate of 100 mV s−1. A stabilized voltammogram was obtained after 8 cycles between the upper and lower potential limits.
A cyclic voltammogram of the modified electrode in the blank solution, Figure 1A, shows an important increase in the double-layer charge contribution as well as the presence of a redox couple at E1/2 = 0.0 V once the hydrogel is immobilized onto the SPE electrode surface. These peaks are indicative of the presence of electroactive species within the hydrogel, probably due to the presence of stabilizer (hydroquinone species) in the precursor reactant. Considering that the enzymatic reaction of the ALP with the substrate (hydroquinone diphosphate) produces its hydrolysis to hydroquinone (HQ), the electrochemical response of the AETAC-modified electrode has been evaluated in presence of the product HQ.
Figure 1B shows the cyclic voltammogram of 1 mM HQ in solution with the AETAC-modified electrode in trizma buffer. In the scan to positive potentials, an oxidation peak appears at about +0.13 V with a faradaic current intensity of +40 μA, while the counter process appears in the reverse scan at −0.13 V. Peak current values of the oxidation and reduction processes are higher for the modified electrode than the current in the bare SPE electrode, which might suggest a higher electroactive surface area. In addition, the peak separation between the anodic and the cathodic features (∆E = 264 mV) shows a more reversible behaviour in the modified electrode than in the bare SPE (∆E = 442 mV). The latter could be a result of the ionic conductivity provided by the hydrogel, facilitating the current flow and electron transfer process [22].
Figure 2A shows cyclic voltammograms recorded for an ALP@AETAC-modified electrode in trizma buffer containing the substrate, 0.5 mM HQ2P.
In the initial scan, no clear oxidation or reduction peaks appear related to the presence of HQ, indicating that the substrate lacks intrinsic electrochemical response. In the successive potential cycling, well-defined cathodic and anodic peaks develop located at around −0.02 V and 0.04 V, respectively, in agreement with the formation of HQ species in solution, coming from the substrate hydrolysis catalysed by the encapsulated ALP. These redox peaks grow with the continued cycling reaching a current peak of 37.1 μA for the oxidation process after 152 cycles.
The oxidation peak intensity is directly related to the concentration of product generated (HQ) by the enzymatic reaction. Figure 2B shows the intensity of the oxidation peak as a function of the time, in which a linear correlation between 0 and 20 min can be observed. Considering that initial period, we can determine the activity of the enzyme from the slope of the linear region. Assuming a relation of the HQ concentration with the oxidation peak of 0.025 mM µA−1 (as determined in Figure 1B), the hydrolysis rate was calculated to be 0.0235 mM min−1 in these conditions. This result suggests that the designed device could be applied to monitor ALP activity in an aqueous environment.
Additional experiments were performed to check the effect of the presence of different anions, other than phosphate, in the biosensor response. We added to the trizma buffer solution chloride, nitrate, and sulfate (sodium salts) anions in concentration 0.05 M in an experiment performed in similar conditions to that shown in Figure 2. The cyclic voltammogram was recorded initially and after 20 min of experiment (see Supplementary Information, Figure S2). From this voltammogram the hydrolysis rate of the substrate reached was 0.027 mM min−1. This rate is very similar to the value in trizma, indicating that these species do not interfere in the response of the biosensor.

3.2. Biosensing Assays for Phosphate Detection

To validate the potential application of the ALP@AETAC-modified electrodes as a biosensor platform, the electrodes were tested in the presence of phosphate ions in solution. Figure 3A shows the cyclic voltammograms for the ALP@AETAC-modified electrode in a trizma buffer solution containing 5 mM PO43− + 0.5 mM HQ2P.
The voltammograms show the redox processes associated with the formation of HQ by the enzymatic reaction of the substrate. The current intensity for redox processes grows more slowly in comparison with the same experiments performed in absence of the phosphate (See Figure 2A) Therefore, the presence of PO43− in solution, a well-known inhibitor, induces a decrease in the enzymatic activity.
Figure 3B shows the evolution of the intensity of the oxidation peak related to the presence of HQ as a function of the time for experiments performed at different concentrations of phosphate ion. For the case of the 1 mM phosphate concentration, the hydrolysis rate reaches a value of 0.0198 mM min−1, which is a value 15% lower than the hydrolysis rate in the absence of this ion. Higher concentrations of phosphate ions lead to a lower hydrolysis rate, reaching 0.0128 mM min−1 and 0.00707 mM min−1 for 3.3 mM and 5 mM of phosphate, respectively. The decreasing production rate of the hydroquinone evidences the inhibiting effect and allows the use of this platform as a biosensor to detect this inhibitor molecule in solution.
To optimize the operating conditions for phosphate sensing, a kinetic study of the ALP@AETAC-modified electrode has been carried out in the absence and presence of the inhibitor. We defined a parameter called inhibition current (IC) as:
I C ( t ) = I p 0 ( t ) I p [ PO 4 3 ] ( t )
with I p 0 ( t ) being the peak current detected at time t in the blank solution and I p [ P O 4 3 ] ( t ) the peak current detected at time t in the experiment performed in the presence of phosphate. Figure 4A shows the evolution of the peak current related to the oxidation of the product in an experiment performed in the blank solution + 0.5 mM HQ2P and a parallel experiment performed after the addition of 10 mM PO43− blank solution difference of the peak current detected.
The values of IC(t) are marked as bars for different times, t = 10 min and t = 30 min. As can be observed, the IC values increase with the time of reaction, reaching ~1/3 of the current intensity in absence of the inhibitor after 25 min of measurement.
Figure 4B plots the IC(t) values as a function of the time of measurement for two experiments performed at different concentrations of phosphate inhibitor (1 and 10 mM). We can observe that the inhibition current increases linearly in both cases for the range time from 0 to 20 min, indicating that the measurement is more sensitive the more time is employed for detection. Measurements performed over 25 min do not produce further enhancement in the IC values. In this regard, the sensitivity of the biosensor improves with the time of measurement, thus 25 min is considered an acceptable and optimum time for the use of the biosensor.
Figure 5 shows the evolution of the inhibition current measured after 25 min of incubation—IC(25)—for different concentrations of phosphate in the drop electrode.
The addition of PO43− produces a continual increase in the IC(25) values due to the rising in the inhibition of the HQ production. The limit of detection for the ALP@AETAC-modified electrode was found to be 0.5 mM of PO43−. This value was determined as LOD = 3σ/S, where S = 2.827 µA mM−1 is the sensitivity of the sensor, which is the slope of the calibration straight in Figure 5, and σ = 0.5 µA is the standard deviation of the blank (hydrogel matrix in the absence of substrate). The developed biosensor showed a broad linear response for phosphate ions in the range of 0–5.0 mM, which together with its detection limit makes this sensor adequate to analyze phosphate in biological fluids or environmental samples [23] with high sensitivity for disposable screen-printed electrodes (22.5 µA mM−1 cm−2, calculated from the geometric area of the working electrode). In this sense, the proposed biosensor shows competitive performance compared to previously reported work, as is shown in Table 1, offering a portable platform for phosphate detection with a short time of analysis.
It is interesting to highlight that, although enzymatic biosensors with higher sensitivity to phosphate than the one described in this work have been published in the literature, as inferred from Table 1, one of the main advantages of the present biosensor is the voltammetric transduction. Voltammetry makes it possible to detect the presence of other electroactive species that could interfere with the measurements and that can be distinguished from the analyte of interest during the voltammetric sweep. This property is an advantage compared to the usual chronoamperometric responses obtained at a fixed potential, where the measured current can come from different species. This also opens the opportunity to obtain reusable biosensors, one of the objectives we intend to achieve in future work since, after a suitable cleaning procedure, the current related to the entrapped products can be considered as a background current, which can be discarded in subsequent experiments.

4. Conclusions

We have developed an easy-to-use portable electrochemical biosensor to measure the activity in situ and in real-time of the enzyme ALP to identify the presence of inhibitors. The biosensor is based on the voltammetry measurement of the electroactive compound hydroquinone, which is the hydrolysis product of the electroinactive substrate hydroquinone diphosphate as catalyzed by the ALP.
AETAC hydrogel containing the enzyme has been directly generated on disposable screen-printed carbon electrodes. The detection of HQ in the hydrogel is more sensitive than the bare SPE electrode. The biosensor was able to quantify the presence of the phosphate ion inhibitor in an aqueous sample with an optimum time of measurement of over 25 min and a LOD of 500 µM. These biosensors can be used to detect and quantify potential ALP inhibitors as potential marine pollutants.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/bios12090698/s1, Figure S1: Photographic images of the AETAC hydrogels adhered to the working electrode of the SPE and Figure S2: Cyclic voltammograms recorded with ALP@AETAC-modified electrode in a solution of 0.5 mM HQ2P in trizma buffer solution containing sodium chloride (50 mM), sodium sulphate (50 mM) and sodium nitrate (50 mM).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.M. and C.R.M..; methodology, Y.A. and A.F.Q.J.; investigation, Y.A. and A.F.Q.J.; resources, F.M.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.A. and A.F.Q.J.; writing—review and editing, Y.A., A.F.Q.J., M.J.M.-T., C.R.M. and F.M.; visualization M.J.M.-T.; supervision, C.R.M. and F.M.; funding acquisition, C.R.M. and F.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (projects PID2019-105923RB-I00, PDC2021-120884-I00, European Union NextGenerationEU PRTR-C17.I1) and Generalitat Valenciana (project GVA-THINKINAZUL/2021/015 and PROMETEO/2018/087).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pabis, A.; Kamerlin, S.C.L. Promiscuity and electrostatic flexibility in the alkaline phosphatase superfamily. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2016, 37, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Rankin, S.A.; Christiansen, A.; Lee, W.; Banavara, D.S.; Lopez-Hernandez, A. Invited review: The application of alkaline phosphatase assays for the validation of milk product pasteurization. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93, 5538–5551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Nsabimana, A.; Lan, Y.; Du, F.; Wang, C.; Zhang, W.; Xu, G. Alkaline phosphatase-based electrochemical sensors for health applications. Anal. Methods 2019, 11, 1996–2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mazzei, F.; Botrè, F.; Montilla, S.; Pilloton, R.; Podestà, E.; Botrè, C. Alkaline phosphatase inhibition based electrochemical sensors for the detection of pesticides. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2004, 574, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Arduini, F.; Cinti, S.; Caratelli, V.; Amendola, L.; Palleschi, G.; Moscone, D. Origami multiple paper-based electrochemical biosensors for pesticide detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 126, 346–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Islam, M.S.; Sazawa, K.; Hata, N.; Sugawara, K.; Kuramitz, H. Determination of heavy metal toxicity by using a micro-droplet hydrodynamic voltammetry for microalgal bioassay based on alkaline phosphatase. Chemosphere 2017, 188, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rashida, M.; Iqbal, J. Inhibition of alkaline phosphatase: An emerging new drug target. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2015, 15, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shaban, S.M.; Jo, S.B.; Hafez, E.; Cho, J.H.; Kim, D.H. A comprehensive overview on alkaline phosphatase targeting and reporting assays. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2022, 465, 214567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Casero, E.; Petit-Domínguez, M.D.; Vázquez, L. Handbook of Sol-Gel Science and Technology: Processing, Characterization and Applications; Klein, L., Aparicio, M., Jitianu, A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 3705–3743. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kandimalla, V.; Tripathi, V.S.; Ju, H. Immobilization of biomolecules in sol–gels: Biological and analytical applications. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2006, 36, 73–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Alacid, Y.; Martínez-Tomé, M.J.; Mateo, C.R. Reusable fluorescent nanobiosensor integrated in a multiwell plate for screening and quantification of antidiabetic drugs. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 25624–25634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sánchez, F.G.; Díaz, A.N.; Peinado, M.C.R.; Belledone, C. Free and sol–gel immobilized alkaline phosphatase-based biosensor for the determination of pesticides and inorganic compounds. Anal. Chim. Acta 2003, 484, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kahveci, Z.; Martínez-Tomé, M.J.; Mallavia, R.; Mateo, C.R. Fluorescent biosensor for phosphate determination based on immobilized polyfluorene–liposomal nanoparticles coupled with alkaline phosphatase. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 136–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bobinger, M.R.; Romero, F.J.; Salinas-Castillo, A.; Becherer, M.; Lugli, P.; Morales, D.P.; Rodríguez, N.; Rivadeneyra, A. Flexible and robust laser-induced graphene heaters photothermally scribed on bare polyimide substrates. Carbon N. Y. 2019, 144, 116–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Toral, V.; Loghin, F.C.; Rodríguez-Diéguez, A.; Lapresta-Fernández, A.; Morales, D.P.; Rivadeneyra, A.; Salinas-Castillo, A. Optimization of Cost-Effective and Reproducible Flexible Humidity Sensors Based on Metal-Organic Frameworks. Sensors 2020, 20, 6981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lapresta-Fernández, A.; Salinas-Castillo, A.; Capitán-Vallvey, L.F. Synthesis of a thermoresponsive crosslinked MEO2MA polymer coating on microclusters of iron oxide nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 3947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Meyer, J.; Meyer, L.E.; Kara, S. Enzyme immobilization in hydrogels: A perfect liaison for efficient and sustainable biocatalysis. Eng. Life Sci. 2022, 22, 165–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Herrmann, A.; Haag, R.; Schedler, U. Hydrogels and Their Role in Biosensing Applications. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2021, 10, 2100062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hughes, G.; Westmacott, K.; Honeychurch, K.C.; Crew, A.; Pemberton, R.M.; Hart, J.P. Recent Advances in the Fabrication and Application of Screen-Printed Electrochemical (Bio)Sensors Based on Carbon Materials for Biomedical, Agri-Food and Environmental Analyses. Biosensors 2016, 6, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ahmed, M.U.; Hossain, M.M.; Safavieh, M.; Wong, Y.L.; Rahman, I.A.; Zourob, M.; Tamiya, E. Toward the development of smart and low cost point-of-care biosensors based on screen printed electrodes. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2016, 36, 495–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Martín-Pacheco, A.; Del Río Castillo, A.E.; Martín, C.; Herrero, M.A.; Merino, S.; Fierro, J.L.G.; Díez-Barra, E.; Vázquez, E. Graphene Quantum Dot–Aerogel: From Nanoscopic to Macroscopic Fluorescent Materials. Sensing Polyaromatic Compounds in Water. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 18192–18201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Gamero-Quijano, A.; Huerta, F.; Salinas-Torres, D.; Morallón, E.; Montilla, F. Electrocatalytic Performance of SiO2-SWCNT Nanocomposites Prepared by Electroassisted Deposition. Electrocatalysis 2013, 4, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Upadhyay, L.S.B.; Verma, N. Alkaline phosphatase inhibition based conductometric biosensor for phosphate estimation in biological fluids. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 68, 611–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cui, J.; Ogabiela, E.E.; Hui, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Tong, L.; Zhang, J.; Adeloju, S.B.; Zhang, X.; Wu, Y. Numerical Simulation and Experimental Verification of Additive Distribution in Through-Silicon via during Copper Filling Process. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2014, 162, D62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Karthikeyan, R.; Berchmans, S. Inorganic-Organic Composite Matrix for the Enzymatic Detection of Phosphate in Food Samples. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2013, 160, D73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yao, T.; Takashima, K.; Nanjyo, Y. Simultaneous determination of orthophosphate and total phosphates (inorganic phosphates plus purine nucleotides) using a bioamperometric flow-injection system made up by a 16-way switching valve. Talanta 2003, 60, 845–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Stepwise preparation of the ALP@AETAC-modified electrode.
Scheme 1. Stepwise preparation of the ALP@AETAC-modified electrode.
Biosensors 12 00698 sch001
Figure 1. Stabilized cyclic voltammogram of pristine SPE carbon electrode (dashed lines) and AETAC-modified electrode in 0.1 M trizma buffer solution (pH = 8.4) in the absence (A) and presence (B) of 1 mM HQ at 100 mV s−1 and room atmosphere. Potentials are referred to the Ag pseudoreference electrode of the SPE.
Figure 1. Stabilized cyclic voltammogram of pristine SPE carbon electrode (dashed lines) and AETAC-modified electrode in 0.1 M trizma buffer solution (pH = 8.4) in the absence (A) and presence (B) of 1 mM HQ at 100 mV s−1 and room atmosphere. Potentials are referred to the Ag pseudoreference electrode of the SPE.
Biosensors 12 00698 g001
Figure 2. (A) Cyclic voltammograms recorded with ALP@AETAC-modified electrode in trizma buffer solution containing 0.5 mM HQ2P at 100 mV s−1 under room atmosphere. Number of cycles: 1 (dashed black line), 19 (black line); 38 (red line); 76 (blue line); 114 (magenta line); 152 (orange line). (B) Evolution of the oxidation peak intensity as a function of the time.
Figure 2. (A) Cyclic voltammograms recorded with ALP@AETAC-modified electrode in trizma buffer solution containing 0.5 mM HQ2P at 100 mV s−1 under room atmosphere. Number of cycles: 1 (dashed black line), 19 (black line); 38 (red line); 76 (blue line); 114 (magenta line); 152 (orange line). (B) Evolution of the oxidation peak intensity as a function of the time.
Biosensors 12 00698 g002
Figure 3. (A) Cyclic voltammograms recorded with ALP@AETAC-modified electrode in 0.5 mM HQ2P + 5 mM PO43− + 0.1 M trizma buffer solution (pH = 8.4) at 100 mV s−1 under room atmosphere. Number of cycles: 19 (black line); 38 (red line); 76 (blue line); 114 (magenta line); 152 (orange line). (B) Current intensity of the oxidation peak as function of time obtained at different concentration of PO43− in solution 0.5 mM HQ2P + 0.1 M trizma buffer solution (pH = 8.4): 1 mM (blue triangles), 3.3 mM (black squares), and 5 mM (red circles).
Figure 3. (A) Cyclic voltammograms recorded with ALP@AETAC-modified electrode in 0.5 mM HQ2P + 5 mM PO43− + 0.1 M trizma buffer solution (pH = 8.4) at 100 mV s−1 under room atmosphere. Number of cycles: 19 (black line); 38 (red line); 76 (blue line); 114 (magenta line); 152 (orange line). (B) Current intensity of the oxidation peak as function of time obtained at different concentration of PO43− in solution 0.5 mM HQ2P + 0.1 M trizma buffer solution (pH = 8.4): 1 mM (blue triangles), 3.3 mM (black squares), and 5 mM (red circles).
Biosensors 12 00698 g003
Figure 4. (A) Evolution of the oxidation peak current intensity recorded during the cyclic voltammetry in trizma buffer solution (pH = 8.4) + 0.5 mM HQ2P in the absence of (blue squares) and presence of PO43− 10 mM (red circles). (B) Inhibition current (IC) obtained at different times of measurement for different concentrations of phosphate: 10 mM PO43− (red circles) and 1 mM PO43− (black squares).
Figure 4. (A) Evolution of the oxidation peak current intensity recorded during the cyclic voltammetry in trizma buffer solution (pH = 8.4) + 0.5 mM HQ2P in the absence of (blue squares) and presence of PO43− 10 mM (red circles). (B) Inhibition current (IC) obtained at different times of measurement for different concentrations of phosphate: 10 mM PO43− (red circles) and 1 mM PO43− (black squares).
Biosensors 12 00698 g004aBiosensors 12 00698 g004b
Figure 5. Calibration curve for the determination of phosphate obtained for the ALP@AETAC-modified electrochemical biosensor. The value of the coefficient of determination of the linear zone is R2 = 0.9993.
Figure 5. Calibration curve for the determination of phosphate obtained for the ALP@AETAC-modified electrochemical biosensor. The value of the coefficient of determination of the linear zone is R2 = 0.9993.
Biosensors 12 00698 g005
Table 1. Comparison of the figures of merit for the ALP@AETAC-modified electrode in the detection of phosphates with other biosensors reported in the literature.
Table 1. Comparison of the figures of merit for the ALP@AETAC-modified electrode in the detection of phosphates with other biosensors reported in the literature.
Composition of the BiosensorLinear Range
[mM]
Sensitivity
[µA mM−1]
LOD
[µM]
Method of DetectionReference
SiO2-AgNPs-EDC/NHS-ALP0.5–550conductimetric[23]
Pyruvate oxidase/Pt/Au nanowires0.25–1.50.07250Chronoamperometric[24]
Pyruvate oxidase/CuNPs/MBA/Au0.25–21.81100Chronoamperometric[25]
MP-Mut-GOD (trienzymatic)/poly(1,2-diaminobenzene)/Pt0.005–0.80.004550.00245Amperometric[26]
ALP@AETAC0.5–52.82500VoltammetricThis work
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alacid, Y.; Quintero Jaime, A.F.; Martínez-Tomé, M.J.; Mateo, C.R.; Montilla, F. Disposable Electrochemical Biosensor Based on the Inhibition of Alkaline Phosphatase Encapsulated in Acrylamide Hydrogels. Biosensors 2022, 12, 698. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12090698

AMA Style

Alacid Y, Quintero Jaime AF, Martínez-Tomé MJ, Mateo CR, Montilla F. Disposable Electrochemical Biosensor Based on the Inhibition of Alkaline Phosphatase Encapsulated in Acrylamide Hydrogels. Biosensors. 2022; 12(9):698. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12090698

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alacid, Yolanda, Andrés F. Quintero Jaime, María José Martínez-Tomé, C. Reyes Mateo, and Francisco Montilla. 2022. "Disposable Electrochemical Biosensor Based on the Inhibition of Alkaline Phosphatase Encapsulated in Acrylamide Hydrogels" Biosensors 12, no. 9: 698. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12090698

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop