Next Article in Journal
CryptoKnight: Generating and Modelling Compiled Cryptographic Primitives
Previous Article in Journal
Perceptual Hashing Based Forensics Scheme for the Integrity Authentication of High Resolution Remote Sensing Image
Previous Article in Special Issue
Getting Ready for the Next Step: Merging Information Ethics and Roboethics—A Project in the Context of Marketing Ethics
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessFeature PaperArticle
Information 2018, 9(9), 230; https://doi.org/10.3390/info9090230

Vital, Sophia, and Co.—The Quest for the Legal Personhood of Robots

Law School, University of Turin, Lungo Dora Siena 100, 10153 Turin, Italy
Received: 26 July 2018 / Revised: 5 September 2018 / Accepted: 7 September 2018 / Published: 10 September 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue ROBOETHICS)
Full-Text   |   PDF [206 KB, uploaded 10 September 2018]

Abstract

The paper examines today’s debate on the legal status of AI robots, and how often scholars and policy makers confuse the legal agenthood of these artificial agents with the status of legal personhood. By taking into account current trends in the field, the paper suggests a twofold stance. First, policy makers shall seriously mull over the possibility of establishing novel forms of accountability and liability for the activities of AI robots in contracts and business law, e.g., new forms of legal agenthood in cases of complex distributed responsibility. Second, any hypothesis of granting AI robots full legal personhood has to be discarded in the foreseeable future. However, how should we deal with Sophia, which became the first AI application to receive citizenship of any country, namely, Saudi Arabia, in October 2017? Admittedly, granting someone, or something, legal personhood is—as always has been—a highly sensitive political issue that does not simply hinge on rational choices and empirical evidence. Discretion, arbitrariness, and even bizarre decisions play a role in this context. However, the normative reasons why legal systems grant human and artificial entities, such as corporations, their status, help us taking sides in today’s quest for the legal personhood of AI robots. Is citizen Sophia really conscious, or capable of suffering the slings and arrows of outrageous scholars? View Full-Text
Keywords: artificial intelligence; legal agent; liability; personhood; responsibility; robotics artificial intelligence; legal agent; liability; personhood; responsibility; robotics
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Pagallo, U. Vital, Sophia, and Co.—The Quest for the Legal Personhood of Robots. Information 2018, 9, 230.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Information EISSN 2078-2489 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top