Open AccessThis article is
- freely available
If Physics Is an Information Science, What Is an Observer?
21 Rue des Lavandières, Caunes Minervois, 11160 France
Received: 9 January 2012; in revised form: 23 January 2012 / Accepted: 10 February 2012 / Published: 16 February 2012
Abstract: Interpretations of quantum theory have traditionally assumed a “Galilean” observer, a bare “point of view” implemented physically by a quantum system. This paper investigates the consequences of replacing such an informationally-impoverished observer with an observer that satisfies the requirements of classical automata theory, i.e., an observer that encodes sufficient prior information to identify the system being observed and recognize its acceptable states. It shows that with reasonable assumptions about the physical dynamics of information channels, the observations recorded by such an observer will display the typical characteristics predicted by quantum theory, without requiring any specific assumptions about the observer’s physical implementation.
Keywords: measurement; system identification; pragmatic information; decoherence; virtual machine; quantum Darwinism; quantum Bayesianism; emergence
Article StatisticsClick here to load and display the download statistics.
Notes: Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
Cite This Article
MDPI and ACS Style
Fields, C. If Physics Is an Information Science, What Is an Observer? Information 2012, 3, 92-123.
Fields C. If Physics Is an Information Science, What Is an Observer? Information. 2012; 3(1):92-123.
Fields, Chris. 2012. "If Physics Is an Information Science, What Is an Observer?" Information 3, no. 1: 92-123.