Next Article in Journal
Next Article in Special Issue
Previous Article in Journal
Information 2011, 2(3), 560-578; doi:10.3390/info2030560
Article

On Representation in Information Theory

Received: 22 June 2011; in revised form: 23 August 2011 / Accepted: 26 August 2011 / Published: 19 September 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Information and Energy/Matter)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [167 KB, uploaded 19 September 2011]
Abstract: Semiotics is widely applied in theories of information. Following the original triadic characterization of reality by Peirce, the linguistic processes involved in information—production, transmission, reception, and understanding—would all appear to be interpretable in terms of signs and their relations to their objects. Perhaps the most important of these relations is that of the representation-one, entity, standing for or representing some other. For example, an index—one of the three major kinds of signs—is said to represent something by being directly related to its object. My position, however, is that the concept of symbolic representations having such roles in information, as intermediaries, is fraught with the same difficulties as in representational theories of mind. I have proposed an extension of logic to complex real phenomena, including mind and information (Logic in Reality; LIR), most recently at the 4th International Conference on the Foundations of Information Science (Beijing, August, 2010). LIR provides explanations for the evolution of complex processes, including information, that do not require any entities other than the processes themselves. In this paper, I discuss the limitations of the standard relation of representation. I argue that more realistic pictures of informational systems can be provided by reference to information as an energetic process, following the categorial ontology of LIR. This approach enables naïve, anti-realist conceptions of anti-representationalism to be avoided, and enables an approach to both information and meaning in the same novel logical framework.
Keywords: dynamic opposition; interaction; logic, process; reality; representation dynamic opposition; interaction; logic, process; reality; representation
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Brenner, J.E. On Representation in Information Theory. Information 2011, 2, 560-578.

AMA Style

Brenner JE. On Representation in Information Theory. Information. 2011; 2(3):560-578.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Brenner, Joseph E. 2011. "On Representation in Information Theory." Information 2, no. 3: 560-578.

Information EISSN 2078-2489 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert