Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Assessing the Possibility of Biological Complexity on Other Worlds, with an Estimate of the Occurrence of Complex Life in the Milky Way Galaxy
Previous Article in Journal
Changes in Acid Herbicide Concentrations in Urban Streams after a Cosmetic Pesticides Ban
Article Menu

Export Article

Challenges 2014, 5(1), 152-158; doi:10.3390/challe5010152

CO Self-Shielding as a Mechanism to Make 16O-Enriched Solids in the Solar Nebula
Joseph A. Nuth III 1,*, Natasha M. Johnson 2 and Hugh G. M. Hill 3
Solar System Exploration Division, NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA
Astrochemistry Laboratory, NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA
International Space University, Strasbourg Central Campus, 1 Rue Jean-Dominique Cassini, 67400 Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; Tel.: +1-301-286-9467; Fax: +1-301-286-1683.
Received: 1 April 2014; in revised form: 8 May 2014 / Accepted: 13 May 2014 / Published: 21 May 2014


: Photochemical self-shielding of CO has been proposed as a mechanism to produce solids observed in the modern, 16O-depleted solar system. This is distinct from the relatively 16O-enriched composition of the solar nebula, as demonstrated by the oxygen isotopic composition of the contemporary sun. While supporting the idea that self-shielding can produce local enhancements in 16O-depleted solids, we argue that complementary enhancements of 16O-enriched solids can also be produced via C16O-based, Fischer-Tropsch type (FTT) catalytic processes that could produce much of the carbonaceous feedstock incorporated into accreting planetesimals. Local enhancements could explain observed 16O enrichment in calcium-aluminum-rich inclusions (CAIs), such as those from the meteorite, Isheyevo (CH/CHb), as well as in chondrules from the meteorite, Acfer 214 (CH3). CO self-shielding results in an overall increase in the 17O and 18O content of nebular solids only to the extent that there is a net loss of C16O from the solar nebula. In contrast, if C16O reacts in the nebula to produce organics and water then the net effect of the self-shielding process will be negligible for the average oxygen isotopic content of nebular solids and other mechanisms must be sought to produce the observed dichotomy between oxygen in the Sun and that in meteorites and the terrestrial planets. This illustrates that the formation and metamorphism of rocks and organics need to be considered in tandem rather than as isolated reaction networks.
Fischer-Tropsch reaction; oxygen isotopic fractionation; nebular chemistry; protostellar nebulae; primitive solar nebula

1. Introduction

Oxygen in minerals found in chondrules and calcium-aluminum-rich inclusions (CAIs) displays a remarkable range in isotopic composition: from rare material that is enriched in 16O by a few percent [1] to grains well above the terrestrial fractionation line [2]. The original problem after discovery [3] was not only to find a process to distribute oxygen isotopes along a “slope 1” line, but also to find a mechanism that simultaneously increased the 16O concentration of the dust. This assumed that the oxygen isotopic composition of the Earth, Mars, and most meteorites was representative of the composition of the dust in the protosolar nebula. However, the oxygen isotopic composition of the Sun, as measured by the Genesis mission [4], is considerably enriched in 16O relative to the composition of Standard Mean Ocean Water (SMOW), a proxy for the oxygen isotopic composition of the Earth. The general consensus is that, as the Sun represents the largest oxygen reservoir in the solar system, then it must also represent the average isotopic composition of the dust and gas in the solar nebula. The problem has therefore been stood on its head and has become one of producing 16O-depleted oxygen isotopic minerals starting from solar composition [5,6,7,8]. Intriguingly, there are some meteoritic materials that are even more enriched in 16O than the Sun [9,10,11]. We will show that a combination of CO self-shielding and Fischer-Tropsch type (FTT) organic synthesis reactions could explain such extreme observations.

Before proceeding however, we must take time to explain the nomenclature of oxygen isotopic measurements found in the literature. Oxygen naturally fractionates during chemical reactions along the Terrestrial Fractionation (TF) line, a line of slope 0.52 in a plot of 17O/16O versus 18O/16O as shown in Figure 1. To anchor this line, the composition of oxygen contained in SMOW is defined as the origin (0.0). Deviations from SMOW along the TF line are due to chemical partitioning of oxygen isotopes during chemical reactions, and can be predicted based on chemical thermodynamics. Deviations from SMOW that do not lie on the TF line were once considered to be possible only as the result of the addition of oxygen from an extra-solar source, such as the addition of pure 16O from a supernova.

There are thus two different ways to express differences from SMOW. One can simply report the deviation from SMOW in terms of the absolute ratios of (17O/16O, 18O/16O) reported as (δ17O, δ18O). The problem with this method is that since normal chemical reactions produce isotopic fractionation, there will always be a range of (δ17O, δ18O) values for any natural sample and it will not be obvious which samples might contain admixtures of extra-solar materials. The solution to this dilemma is to report oxygen isotopic compositions as Δ17O; this is the deviation of the sample from the TF line in units of δ17O at the sample’s δ18O coordinate. Any terrestrial sample will therefore have a Δ17O value of 0 anywhere along the TF line. Meteoritic samples and samples of other planetary bodies were expected to have slightly different Δ17O values depending on the chemical partitioning of the constituents from which they formed and this is seen in the data shown in Figure 1. In this paper we will generally use the (δ17O, δ18O) notation, though we will occasionally refer to the Δ17O values if necessary to avoid misunderstandings.

In FTT reactions, CO reacts with hydrogen on grain surfaces to produce methane and water in the idealized case. In reality, the products produced in the solar nebula will include water and a host of organic molecules [12,13,14]. We have previously argued [15] that FTT reactions could seriously decrease the efficiency of the CO self-shielding mechanism for the production of 16O-depleted solids in the solar nebula. Specifically, if the isotopically-heavy water and 16O-rich CO do not separate completely and the CO undergoes FTT reactions that release 16O-rich water back into the system, then the effects of the self-shielding reactions will be diminished. If separation occurs, then isotopically-heavy water can react to produce 16O-depleted silicates. However, the converse can also occur when 16O-rich CO is separated from the heavier water and is not lost from the nebula, but instead undergoes FTT reactions that release 16O-rich water into the nebula.

For nearly three decades following discovery of the mass independent fractionation of oxygen in solids from the early history of the solar system, the Reservoir Mixing Model [2] dominated alternative explanations for this phenomenon. This model assumed that nearly pure 16O-rich solids, derived from a nearby supernova, seeded the early nebula and formed a mixing line with “normal” nebular solids. The model predicted the existence of extremely 16O-enriched presolar grains, possibly corundum (Al2O3) or hibonite (CaAl12O19) dust synthesized in the supernova that had survived processing in the nebula. While many other presolar grains have been observed in meteorites [16], 16O-rich presolar grains are rare and are not present in sufficient numbers to validate this prediction.

As an alternative to the Reservoir Mixing Model, and still under the prevailing assumption that an oxygen isotopic composition near that of Standard Mean Ocean Water (SMOW) constituted the average composition of nebular materials, Marcus [17] proposed a quantum chemical model for the condensation of solids with mass-independent oxygen isotopic fractionation that drove solids to more 16O-rich compositions while the surrounding gas became depleted in 16O. To date, this is the only published mechanism for processing solids which results in a more 16O-rich solid end product. The modern versions of the Chemical Self-Shielding Model [5,6,7,8] all result in 16O-depleted solids compared to the starting compositions in keeping with the assumed necessity of going from a solar oxygen isotopic composition [4] near (−40, −40) up to SMOW, defined to be at (0,0).

However, the oxygen isotopic composition of the sun is not an end-member on the mixing line that runs from SMOW through the anomalous CAI and chondrule compositions towards the pure 16O-rich solid compositions once predicted by the Reservoir Mixing Model. In fact, there are CAIs from the meteorite Isheyevo (CH/CBb) [11], as well as chondrules from the meteorite Acfer 214 (CH3) [9], that plot nearly as far below the sun (at −70, −70) as SMOW is above the solar oxygen isotopic composition (Note that in Δ17O notation the composition of the sun is at −28 per mil while Acfer and Isheyevo are at −34). These meteoritic components are much too large to represent the average composition of an early population of nebular dust [18] injected by a nearby supernova. Furthermore, if nebular solids gradually migrated towards more 16O-depleted compositions with time, then these solids must have been produced very early in nebular history in order to buck the prevailing trend towards 16O-depletion. Are these the 16O-enriched condensates that were predicted by Marcus [17]?

Figure 1. A typical three-isotope plot of oxygen isotopes in calcium-aluminum-rich inclusions (CAIs) and chondrules, and in various meteorite types (note that the label “O chondrules” refers to chondrules from ordinary chondrites, “E chondrules” from enstatite chondrites, “C chondrules” from carbonaceous chondrites and TF is the Terrestrial Fractionation line). The CAI line delineates the evolution of oxygen in solids either by evaporation + exchange + recondensation or by photodissociation. Any mineral phase on the CAI line can react and fractionate along slope 0.52 lines to broaden the CAI line. Finally, if the oxygen isotopic composition of the gas and dust were originally the same, then cometary water (representing the nebular gas) would evolve to more negative values as processing proceeded to increase the dust in 17O and 18O. However, since there is 20–30 times more gas than dust, the effect on the isotopic composition of the gas is much less dramatic than on the composition of the solids.
Figure 1. A typical three-isotope plot of oxygen isotopes in calcium-aluminum-rich inclusions (CAIs) and chondrules, and in various meteorite types (note that the label “O chondrules” refers to chondrules from ordinary chondrites, “E chondrules” from enstatite chondrites, “C chondrules” from carbonaceous chondrites and TF is the Terrestrial Fractionation line). The CAI line delineates the evolution of oxygen in solids either by evaporation + exchange + recondensation or by photodissociation. Any mineral phase on the CAI line can react and fractionate along slope 0.52 lines to broaden the CAI line. Finally, if the oxygen isotopic composition of the gas and dust were originally the same, then cometary water (representing the nebular gas) would evolve to more negative values as processing proceeded to increase the dust in 17O and 18O. However, since there is 20–30 times more gas than dust, the effect on the isotopic composition of the gas is much less dramatic than on the composition of the solids.
Challenges 05 00152 g001 1024

2. Interactions between Organic Synthesis and Oxygen Isotopic Fractionation

Most modelers assume that the 17O and 18O isotopes freed by CO self-shielding are incorporated into ice grains, but that the left over C16O remains in the gas phase until it is lost from the nebula or the protosolar cloud from which it collapsed. To preserve the full effect of this fractionation process, the icy grains must become completely separated from the C16O gas or the C16O must remain forever inert. Unfortunately, nebular CO is far from inert. Both Fischer-Tropsch type reactions [13] as well as radiation-induced icy grain chemistry [19] can convert CO into organic materials, freeing 16O back into the nebula, typically as water. This leads to three possible long-term outcomes for the CO self-shielding models depending upon the degree of separation of the 16O-rich CO and 16O-depleted water produced in the model.

In Scenario 1, the CO remains inert and is eventually lost from the nebula. In Scenario 2, the CO remains with the water as it descends to higher temperature environments and reacts with silicates, while those silicates act as catalysts for the FTT process and release water from the CO. In Scenario 3, 16O-depleted water separates from 16O-enriched CO, but both remain in the nebula and participate in subsequent chemical reactions, though in different, localized, nebular regions. Scenario 1 is the typical self-shielding model producing 16O-depleted water that is eventually transferred into increasingly 16O-depleted nebular solids. Scenario 2 is the antithesis of Scenario 1, as nebular chemistry converts the 16O-rich CO into organics releasing the 16O back into the nebula as water and largely cancels the effects of the self-shielding process. Scenario 3 has an interesting and complicated outcome depending on whether it is examined on a local scale or on a global scale.

On a global scale, the outcome for the average oxygen isotopic composition of nebular dust in Scenario 3 is exactly the same as for Scenario 2: there is no net effect on the average oxygen isotopic composition of nebular dust. The 16O-depleted water reacts to form 16O-depleted dust in one region while the 16O-rich CO reacts via FTT processes or radiation-induced chemistry within icy grains to form 16O-enriched solids. The net global average oxygen isotopic composition of nebular dust remains unchanged as, proportionally, just as much 16O-rich water was released from the CO via FTT or other processes as was required to compensate for the 16O-depleted water produced via self-shielding earlier. Of course, there is an entire spectrum of possibilities between Scenarios 1 and 2, depending on the degree to which C16O is actually lost from the nebula (or incorporated into organic compounds) rather than just spatially separated from the 16O-depleted water produced via the self-shielding process.

On a local scale, the results can be much more varied. FTT-produced, 16O-enriched water could react during either the CAI or chondrule formation process to produce CAIs or chondrules that are more 16O-rich than the average dust composition at that time in the nebula. If this occurs late in nebular history, after the oxygen isotopic composition of the dust has become more 16O-depleted than the sun, it will be difficult to tell such CAIs and chondrules from those produced earlier in nebular history when the dust was more 16O-rich. However, if such processes occur quite early in nebular history it may be possible to drive the composition of temporarily isolated nebular regions to significantly 16O-enriched levels compared to solar [4] and to leave a record of such extraordinary regions as relatively durable CAIs and chondrules such as those found in Isheyevo (CH/CBb) [11] and Acfer 214 (CH3) [9]. Such materials will be exceedingly rare given that they must survive all further nebular events as well as processing that might occur in a meteorite parent body and they should represent some of the oldest surviving materials produced in the formation of our solar system. It might be possible that this hypothesis could be tested by measurements of the absolute ages of these unique materials.

3. Conclusions

We have argued that chemical processes in the solar nebula that result in non-mass-dependent oxygen isotopic fractionation could be intimately coupled to processes that form organic materials: processes that have previously been considered to be completely independent of one another. Not only can organic synthesis totally erase the oxygen isotopic signature of self-shielding on nebular dust globally, but the combination of organic synthesis releasing CO back into the nebula as water, with the isotopic fractionation due to self-shielding, can potentially lead to separate regions that are respectively enriched and depleted in 16O in a complementary fashion. Furthermore, given the large degree of mixing that can occur in the solar nebula, it is possible that the oxygen isotopic composition of specific dust populations does not change monotonically from solar towards SMOW. Unfortunately, it might be very difficult to distinguish solids that have become more 16O-rich from those that may have become 16O depleted less rapidly than average, except at the very earliest times in nebular history when these processes would result in solids that are more 16O-rich than the Sun, such as those measured in Isheyevo and Acfer 214.


JAN and NMJ acknowledge the support of NASA’s Exobiology R&A program as well as the Goddard Center for Astrobiology for supporting this research.

Author Contributions

The ideas in this manuscript arose as the result of many conversations among the authors and have been presented and discussed at several scientific meetings. JAN wrote the first draft of the manuscript that was then extensively improved by the co-authors and as the result of comments from our reviewers.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. MacPherson, G.J.; Simon, S.B.; Davis, A.M.; Grossman, L.; Krot, A.N. Calcium-Aluminium-rich inclusions: major unanswered questions. In Chondrules and the Protoplanetary Disk; Krot, A.N., Scott, E.R.D., Reipurth, B., Eds.; Astron. Soc. Pacific Conference Series: San Francisco, NC, USA, 2005; Volume 341, pp. 225–250. [Google Scholar]
  2. Clayton, R.N. Oxygen isotopes in meteorites. Ann. Rev. Plan. Sci. 1993, 21, 115–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Clayton, R.; Grossman, L.; Mayeda, T. A component of primitive nuclear composition in carbonaceous meteorites. Science 1973, 182, 485–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. McKeegan, K.D.; Kallio, A.P.A.; Heber, V.S.; Jarzebinski, G.; Mao, P.H.; Coath, C.D.; Kunihiro, T.; Wiens, R.C.; Nordholt, J.E.; Moses, R.W., Jr.; et al. The oxygen isotopic composition of the Sun inferred from captured solar wind. Science 2011, 332, 1528–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Clayton, R.N. Solar system: Self-shielding in the solar nebula. Nature 2002, 415, 860–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yurimoto, H.; Kuramoto, K. Molecular cloud origin for the oxygen isotope heterogeneity in the solar system. Science 2004, 305, 1763–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lyons, J.R.; Young, E.D. CO self-shielding as the origin of oxygen isotope anomalies in the early Solar nebula. Nature 2005, 435, 317–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dominguez, G. A heterogeneous chemical origin for the 16O-enriched and 16O-depleted reservoirs of the early solar system. Astrophys. J. 2010, 713, L59–L63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kobayashi, S.; Imai, H.; Yurimoto, H. New extreme 16O-rich reservoir in the early solar system. Geochem. J. 2003, 37, 663–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yoshitake, M.; Koide, Y.; Yurimoto, H. Correlations between oxygen-isotopic composition and petrologic setting in a coarse-grained Ca, Al–rich inclusion. GCA 2005, 69, 2663–2674. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gounelle, M.; Krot, A.N.; Nagashima, K.; Kearsley, A. Extreme 16O-enrichment in refractory Inclusions from the Isheyevo meteorite: Implication for oxygen isotope composition of the Sun. Astrophys. J. 2009, 698, L18–L22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hayatsu, R.; Anders, E.V. Organic compounds in meteorites and their origins. Top. Curr. Chem. 1981, 99, 1–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hill, H.G.M.; Nuth, J.A. The catalytic potential of cosmic dust: Implications for prebiotic chemistry in the solar nebula and other protoplanetary systems. Astrobiology 2003, 3, 291–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nuth, J.A.; Johnson, N.M.; Manning, S. A self perpetuating catalyst for the production of complex organic molecules in protostellar nebulae. Astrophys. J. 2008, 673, L225–L228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nuth, J.A.; Paquette, J.A.; Farquhar, A. Can lightning produce significant levels of mass-independent oxygen isotopic fractionation in nebular dust? Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 2012, 47, 2056–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Davis, A.M. Stardust in meteorites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2011, 108, 19142–19146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Marcus, R.A. Mass independent isotope effect in the earliest processed solids in the solar system: A possible chemical mechanism. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 121, 8201–8211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nuth, J.A.; Hill, H.G.M. Planetary accretion, oxygen isotopes and the central limit theorem. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 2004, 39, 1957–1965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ciesla, F.J.; Sandford, S.A. Organic synthesis via irradiation and warming of ice grains in the solar nebula. Science 2012, 336, 452–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Challenges EISSN 2078-1547 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top