Next Article in Journal
Balanced Intense Exercise Training Induces Atrial Oxidative Stress Counterbalanced by the Antioxidant System and Atrial Hypertrophy That Is Not Associated with Pathological Remodeling or Arrhythmogenicity
Next Article in Special Issue
Role of Natural Antioxidants on Neuroprotection and Neuroinflammation
Previous Article in Journal
β-Carotene-Induced Alterations in Haemoglobin Affinity to O2
Previous Article in Special Issue
Memory-Enhancing Effects of Mangosteen Pericarp Water Extract through Antioxidative Neuroprotection and Anti-Apoptotic Action
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antioxidants
Volume 10
Issue 3
10.3390/antiox10030453
antioxidants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Antioxidant Therapeutics in Parkinson’s Disease: Current Challenges and Opportunities

by
Ana Patricia Duarte-Jurado
1,
Yareth Gopar-Cuevas
1,
Odila Saucedo-Cardenas
1,2,
Maria de Jesus Loera-Arias
1,
Roberto Montes-de-Oca-Luna
1,
Aracely Garcia-Garcia
1,* and
Humberto Rodriguez-Rocha
1,*
1
Departamento de Histología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey 64460, Mexico
2
Centro de Investigación Biomédica del Noreste, Departamento de Genética Molecular, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Delegación Nuevo León 40080, Mexico
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2021, 10(3), 453; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10030453
Submission received: 29 January 2021 / Revised: 8 March 2021 / Accepted: 11 March 2021 / Published: 15 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Role of Natural Antioxidants on Neuroprotection and Neuroinflammation)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Oxidative stress is considered one of the pathological mechanisms that cause Parkinson’s disease (PD), which has led to the investigation of several antioxidants molecules as a potential therapeutic treatment against the disease. Although preclinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy of these compounds to maintain neuronal survival and activity in PD models, these results have not been reflected in clinical trials, antioxidants have not been able to act as disease modifiers in terms of clinical symptoms. Translational medicine currently faces the challenge of redesigning clinical trials to standardize criteria when testing molecules to reduce responses’ variability. Herein, we discuss current challenges and opportunities regarding several non-enzymatic antioxidants’ therapeutic molecules for PD patients’ potential treatment.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive, chronic, and degenerative neurological disorder. It manifests as a movement disorder, tremor, bradykinesia, and rigidity. PD is the second most common neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer’s disease [1,2]. The estimated prevalence in industrialized countries is 0.3% in the general population, and older than 60 years is around 1% [1]. The incidence seems to increase with age, reaching 0.3 patients for every 1000 people between 55 and 65, and 4.4 patients for every 1000 people older than 85 years [3].
The main pathological characteristic of PD is the progressive degeneration of dopaminergic neurons [4]. Dopaminergic neurons are susceptible to oxidative damage due to dopamine’s inherent metabolism, which is oxidized and generates reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to cellular oxidative stress, where ROS have different macromolecular targets [5]. Furthermore, oxidative stress and neuroinflammation exert a synergistic effect on PD pathogenesis [6]. In situ or peripheral neuroinflammation, including glial cell activity [7,8], and pro-inflammatory cytokines [9], has been observed in post-mortem brain samples from PD patients, which might contribute to the cascade of events that lead to neurodegeneration. Once activated, glial cells are capable of regulating various enzymatic systems, such as NADPH oxidase, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and myeloperoxidase [10], with the subsequent production of cytotoxic factors like superoxide anion (O2•−) and nitric oxide (NO•).
Substantial evidence suggests that oxidative stress is involved in the etiology and pathogenesis of neurodegenerative disorders. The brain is rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids. Therefore, it is highly susceptible to lipid peroxidation, which is a complex process that involves the interaction of fatty acids with free radicals generating reactive electrophilic aldehydes. Lipid peroxidation occurs in many neurodegenerative diseases [11]. Evidence of oxidative stress in these diseases is further supported by increased oxidation of DNA and RNA as well as oxidative protein damage in some brain areas [12]. In addition to lipids, DNA, and RNA, proteins are the main targets of oxidative stress, and their oxidated forms and byproducts are potential biomarkers in neurodegenerative diseases. Increased lipid peroxidation (evidenced by decreased polyunsaturated fatty acids and increased malondialdehyde and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal) elevated 8-hydroxyguanosine (8OHG) as an indicator of nucleic acid oxidation, and high protein carbonylation and nitration (3-nitrotyrosine) have been detected in PD patients [13,14,15,16]. The destruction of some cellular components induces a diversity of responses through the generation of secondary reactive species (RS) and ultimately leads to cell death by apoptosis or necrosis [17,18,19].
The most conclusive association between PD and oxidative stress is supported by post-mortem studies of PD patients’ brains, where increased oxidative activity and macromolecules damage were found in dopaminergic neurons [20,21].
Antioxidants are enzymes, molecules, ions, or even very stable radicals capable of delaying or preventing another molecule’s oxidation. According to their activity, antioxidants can be classified into enzymatic and non-enzymatic. Enzymatic antioxidants break down and remove free radicals in a multistep process accompanied by cofactors, while non-enzymatic antioxidants interrupt free radical chain reactions [22]. Although molecules known as non-enzymatic antioxidants have shown neuroprotective effects in PD experimental models, they have failed to reproduce this protection in clinical trials. This review will discuss the current challenges and opportunities regarding several non-enzymatic antioxidants and their potential as a therapeutic treatment for PD patients.

2. Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Defense

An imbalance of RS production and reactive intermediates detoxification generates oxidative stress. Oxidative stress affects cellular function by targeting nucleic acids, lipids, and proteins, all of which are constituents of cell organelles [23]. RS comprises not only ROS, and reactive nitrogen species (RNS), but also reactive sulfur species (RSN), reactive carbonyl species (RCS), reactive halogen species (RHS), reactive selenium species (RSeS), and reactive nucleophilic species [24], generated by biological processes within the cell in normal and stressful conditions. Biomolecules are highly susceptible to oxidation by one or more ROS and RNS present in the environment, generated as by-products of normal metabolism, or during exposure to X, λ, or UV irradiation. In some cases, ROS are used against infectious pathogens or signaling pathways [25]. RS have a double and opposed function on cell fate. Under physiological conditions, a moderate RS increase plays an essential role in promoting cell proliferation and survival. However, when RS exceeds baseline levels, surpassing the cells’ antioxidant capacity, cell metabolic processes are affected. Usually, antioxidant defenses counteract oxidative stress and antioxidants along with the turnover of oxidated macromolecules and organelles, leading to cell survival. If oxidative stress persists, it can trigger cell death, including neuronal cell death or permanent cell damage producing cellular transformation [26]. ROS include many species, such as O2•−, hydroxyl radical (OH•), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), while RNS comprise NO• and peroxynitrite (ONOO−). The primary source of ROS production within the cell are mitochondria (Figure 1). There, O2•− is generated by electron leakage in the electron transport chain (ETC) and released to the mitochondrial matrix [27]. Another source is the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase family (NOX enzymes), which uses NADPH to reduce molecular oxygen to produce O2•− and release it to the cytoplasmic and extracellular compartments [28]. Usually, O2•− is enzymatically dismuted to H2O2 by the superoxide dismutases MnSOD in the mitochondrial matrix, by Cu/ZnSOD in the IMS or cytosol [29], or EcSOD in the extracellular space [30]. Subsequently, H2O2 is detoxified in the cytoplasm and mitochondrial matrix by catalase [31], peroxiredoxins (Prx) [32], or the glutathione (GSH) peroxidase system (GPx) [33]. Although O2•− cannot cross biological membranes [34], H2O2 freely diffuses through membranes [35] and reacts with metal ions mediating the highly reactive OH• formation by the Fenton’s reaction [36]. The formation of NO• is induced by NOS enzyme [37]. The reaction between NO• and O2•− is faster (0.7–1.9 × 1010 M−1s−1) than that with SOD (1–2 × 109 M−1s−1). Therefore, NO• overcomes the SOD reaction for O2•− [38]. Consequently, every collision between NO• and O2•− results in the formation of ONOO−. The small hydrophobic NO• molecule freely diffuses across membranes. Therefore, it is feasible that ONOO− forms close to the O2•− generation sites with the incoming NO• molecules produced at a farther distance [39]. At physiological pH, ONOO− crosses membranes and affects surrounding cells, reacting with thiol groups and transition metals. When ONOOH undergoes decomposition, it generates one-electron oxidants OH• and (nitrogen dioxide) NO2• [40]. In addition, the antioxidant scavenging system includes several non-enzymatic antioxidants (Figure 2), which are easy to obtain and modify the administration dose, including mitochondria-targeted antioxidant (MitoQ) [41], coenzyme Q10 [42], and carnosine [43], which are targeted to the mitochondria, the main source of free radicals; some endogenous antioxidants precursors like inosine, which is metabolized into uric acid (UA) [44], and N-acetylcysteine (NAC) [45], a glutathione (GSH) precursor; GSH itself [46], known as “the master antioxidant”; and vitamins C and E [47], whose effects on PD, from experimental to clinical, have been explored and will be discussed below.

3. Mitochondria-Targeted Antioxidants Therapeutic Effect on PD

3.1. Coenzyme Q10

Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) is a parabenzoquinone (also known as ubiquinone) ubiquitous in virtually all cells; it is a crucial component of the oxidative phosphorylation process in the mitochondria but is not just an agent for energy transduction. It is also well located close to the membranes unsaturated lipids, acting as a primary scavenger of free radicals to avoid lipid peroxidation [42], protecting biological membranes and DNA from oxidative damage [48].
The chemical structure of CoQ10 is very similar to vitamins; however, it is not considered one of them because it is the only lipid-soluble antioxidant that can be synthesized de novo by animal cells [49].
Ubiquinone endogenous levels depend on the production and consumption rates within the organism. The dietary intake of CoQ10 is minimal with daily contributions of around 3–5 mg [50], which explains why supplementation with CoQ10 has been recommended in cases of deficiency. Despite this, oral administration of CoQ10 has a poor absorption efficiency due to its hydrophobic nature. Therefore, various formulations have been created to improve its bioavailability [51]. Normal plasma CoQ10 levels are 0.5 to 1.5 μg/mL. Solubilized formulations administration increases the CoQ10 plasmatic concentration from doses of 100 mg [52], reaching levels of 3.25 μg/mL [53]. However, these concentrations need to be higher to promote its uptake by peripheral tissues and even cross the blood–brain barrier [54]. The highest CoQ10 plasmatic concentration is reached approximately 6 h after administration, and once no CoQ10 is free in circulation, it is mainly carried by LDL and VLDL lipoproteins. CoQ10′s half-life is 33 h, and it takes 1–2 weeks to reach a pharmacological steady-state [55]. Moreover, CoQ10 chronic oral administration increases mitochondrial CoQ10 concentration in the cerebral cortex attenuating striatal lesions and increasing life span in mice models [56].
Ubiquinone endogenous levels depend on the production and consumption rates within the organism. Ubiquinone levels are altered in some diseases associated with oxidative stress, including PD [57,58,59,60].
A significant CoQ10 concentration reduction was found in the cortex of PD post-mortem brain samples [61], while patients’ total CoQ10 plasma levels were decreased, in addition to an increased percentage of the oxidized form of ubiquinone, compared to healthy subjects [62]. More specifically, mitochondrial CoQ10 levels in PD patients’ platelets were lower than in age- and sex-matched control [63].
The effectiveness of CoQ10 as a protector against cell toxicity has been demonstrated in in vitro PD models. When striatal sections of adult mice were cultivated and treated with MPP+, the co-incubation with CoQ10 achieved a significantly reduced dopaminergic cell loss [64]. In addition, a CoQ10 pre-treatment reduced rotenone-induced cell death in human neuroblastoma cells [65]. These beneficial effects were reproducible in more complex experimental models. In African green monkeys, oral supplementation of 15 to 22 mg/kg per day for ten days before MPTP administration attenuated the loss of nigral dopaminergic neurons [66].
Clinical trials for CoQ10 in PD patients began more than two decades ago, initially with short studies and a few patients, finding that oral doses of 200 mg daily for three months were safe. However, no beneficial effect was obtained [67,68] (Table 1). After that, a more extensive study was performed with early PD-diagnosed patients, who were treated with doses up to 1200 mg per day, showing that CoQ10 was safe and well-tolerated and delayed the progressive function deterioration [69]. From these studies, doses and number of patients have been modified; however, the effects of preclinical trials have not been reproduced [70,71,72,73].

3.2. Mitochondria-Targeted Antioxidant (MitoQ)

An orally available derivative of mitochondrial-targeted coenzyme Q10 is a therapeutic compound termed Mitoquinone (MitoQ), which is an ubiquinone synthesized from the union of its oxidized (mitoquinone) and reduced (mitoquinol) form and a covalent bond to a lipophilic thriphenylphosphonium cation through an aliphatic carbon chain [41].
The MitoQ oral formulations have shown suitable pharmacokinetics behavior; doses of 1 mg/kg reach a maximum plasma concentration of 33.15 ng/mL after one hour of administration [74]. MitoQ is rapidly cleared from plasma and accumulates in the heart, skeletal muscle, liver, and brain; its accumulation came to a steady-state after 7 to 10 days of administration [75].
MitoQ quickly crosses the blood–brain barrier and cell membranes and concentrates on mitochondria because of its high membrane potential across the inner mitochondrial membrane [76]. Once inside, almost all the accumulated MitoQ is adsorbed to the inner membrane’s matrix surface, where it is reduced to the active antioxidant ubiquinol by complex II in the respiratory chain. MitoQ scavenges peroxyl radicals (ROO•), ONOO− and O2•− and protects mitochondria against lipid peroxidation. It is also a poor substrate for complex I and has no reactivity with complex III, so MitoQ remains in its reduced form ubiquinol, being more efficient than CoQ10 [77].
MitoQ proved to be protective in cellular and animal models of diseases related to oxidative stress. In a cellular PD model, MitoQ markedly inhibited 6-OHDA-induced mitochondrial fragmentation [78]. To support these findings, MitoQ treatment achieved an attenuation of both the loss of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and mitochondrial respiratory chain dysfunction induced by MPP+ in dopaminergic cells. In addition, the same effects were obtained from the PD animal model [79].
Despite these remarkable results, clinical interventions have not achieved the same impact. To determine whether MitoQ slows down or stops PD progression, different doses were tested in newly diagnosed PD patients in a double-blind clinical trial (Table 1). However, no difference was found between MitoQ treatments and the placebo group [80].

3.3. Carnosine

Carnosine (β-alanyine-l-histidine) is an endogenous dipeptide of excitable tissues (skeletal muscle, heart, and brain); it is highly hydrophilic, penetrates the blood–brain barrier easily, and has significant antioxidant properties. Carnosine is electrochemically active as a reducing agent; it shows peroxyl radical-trapping activity; inhibits deoxyguanosine oxidative hydroxylation induced by copper ions; and acts as a metal ion chelator, quenching singlet oxygen and binding hydroperoxides [43].
Carnosine concentration in the human brain is currently lacking in the literature. Homocarnosine (γ-aminobutyryl-l-histidine) is a novel alternative imidazole peptide with structural similarity to carnosine. Homocarnosine concentration in the human brain is quite high (0.4–1.0 µM). Both carnosine and homocarnosine are synthesized by carnosine synthase and degraded by carnosinase [81]
Carnosine restored intracellular ATP depleted by a 6-OHDA toxic effect in vitro and significantly suppressed the induction of stress-related genes activated by 6-OHDA [82]. An animal model with accelerated senescence under carnosine diet administration showed an increase in the average lifespan. This effect was accompanied by a decrease in mitochondrial MAO and Na/K-ATPase activity in synaptosome [83]. On the other hand, intranasal carnosine administration in a transgenic αSyn mice PD model decreased αSyn deposition in the olfactory epithelium [84].
In addition, a pilot study where PD patients with trembling-rigid manifestations received basic therapy for the disease (Levodopa and dopamine receptors agonist) and daily dietary supplementation with carnosine via oral showed increased efficiency of PD basic therapy, with neurological symptom improvement and pronounced SOD restoration, which is suppressed in PD [85]. Even with these promising results, carnosine’s efficacy has not currently been reassessed, either alone or in combination with the basic disease therapy or other antioxidants.
Although mitochondria as a target for antioxidants seems ideal because they are the main compartment where oxidative stress is produced, targeting oxidative molecules only in this subcellular compartment has been insufficient in patient’s therapy.
Table
Table 1. Summary of mitochondrial antioxidants effect on PD clinical trials.
Table 1. Summary of mitochondrial antioxidants effect on PD clinical trials.
AntioxidantStudy DesignClinical TrialSubjects (n)Primary OutcomesReference
Coenzyme Q10Pilot studyNot applicable10Safe and well-tolerated
No significant effect on the clinical ratings		[67]
Pilot StudyNot applicable15Safe and well-tolerated
No significant effect on the clinical ratings (UPDRS)		[68]
Multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dosage-rangingPhase II80Safe and well-tolerated at dosages of up to 1200 mg/d ↓ Disability developed, and the benefit was most significant in subjects receiving the highest dosage
Slow the progressive deterioration of function in PD		[69]
Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trialPhase III397 + 201safe and well-tolerated
No evidence of clinical benefit		[70]
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group pilot trialsPhase II28 + 20↓ UPDRS score[71]
Meta-AnalysisPhase III Does not slow functional decline or provide any symptomatic benefits[72]
Double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlledPhase IITotal predict number: 84This study focuses on genetically stratified subgroups of Parkinson’s disease patients (PD) with enrichment of risk variants in mitochondrial genes, who might benefit from treatment with the “mitochondrial enhancer” coenzyme Q10[73]
MitoQDouble-blind, placebo-controlled studyPhase II128Did not slow the progression of PD[80]
CarnosinePilot comparative clinical trialPhase I36 + 20↑ The efficiency of PD patients’ primary therapy.
↓ UPDRS score
Restoration of SOD		[85]

4. Inosine Therapeutic Effect on PD

Inosine, also known as hypoxanthosine or panholic-L, belongs to the organic compounds known as purine nucleosides. It is an intermediate in the degradation of purines and purine nucleosides to UA and purine salvage pathways.
Inosine is a urate precursor, which has an antioxidant effect in vitro [44] and in vivo [86]. UA represents about 60% of total plasma antioxidant capacity [87]; it scavenges singlet oxygen (1O2), OH•, H2O2, and ONOO− [88]. However, its effect is not limited to eliminating free radicals. UA-mediated neuroprotection has been improved by high K+-induced depolarization through a mechanism involving Ca2+ increasing and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) activation, which is involved in neuronal survival [89]. UA also interacts and stabilizes other antioxidant systems, including SOD [90]. UA has metal-complexing properties, too; it chelates iron by forming stable complexes with Fe3+ and blocking iron-dependent oxidation reactions [91].
Despite being the most abundant antioxidant in plasma, its concentration is ten times lower in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Its distribution is caudo-rostral gradient, at the highest concentration in the lumbar region and 50 times less at the brain stem level [92].
UA’s decreased concentration has been related to a higher susceptibility to oxidative damage [93] and a high-risk prediction for developing PD [94]. Interestingly, PD patients with higher UA plasma levels had a slow disease progression [95].
In neuron-like cells (PC12 cells), UA prevented oxidative damage induced by 6-OHDA by decreasing the levels of the lipid peroxidation biomarker malondialdehyde (MDA) as well as consumption of other antioxidants such as GSH and SOD [96]. This effect was also observed in a PD animal model induced by 6-OHDA, where GSH depletion, SOD activity decrease, and dopaminergic neuronal damage resulting from the 6-OHDA injury were reversed by intraperitoneal treatment with UA [86].
The previous evidence led to clinical trials to assess inosine’s effect on neurodegenerative diseases. Initially, clinical studies showed that, although inosine can increase plasma antioxidants, there is a lack of apparent inosine effect on CSF (Table 2). This may suggest that inosine’s antioxidant actions do not extend to the central nervous system, or at least to its CSF compartment [97]. Later, in the SURE-PD trial, it was observed that inosine produced more significant increases in serum and CSF urate in women compared to men [98]. Currently, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study is being completed, where 298 subjects were enrolled. Its main objective is to determine the urate precursor inosine’s early PD capability as a disease modifier.
Despite being widely studied as a biomarker and a risk predictor of PD, the specific mechanism of urate and its interaction with other antioxidants systems is not clearly defined, which is essential to achieve the preclinical effects when administered to patients.
Table
Table 2. Summary of inosine antioxidant effect on PD clinical trials.
Table 2. Summary of inosine antioxidant effect on PD clinical trials.
AntioxidantStudy DesignClinical TrialSubjects (n)Primary OutcomesReference
InosineProspective cohort studyNA4695↑ serum levels of UA ↓ risk of PD[94]
Double-blind randomizedNA800↑ serum and CSF UA
↓ clinical decline in PD		[95]
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-rangingPhase II75↑serum and CSF urate levels in early PD[98]
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlledPhase II75Dose-dependent and persistent elevation of plasma antioxidant capacity form oral inosine[97]
Placebo-controlled double-blind dose-rangingPhase II b75↑ serum and CSF urate in women compared to men[98]

5. Cysteine-Based Antioxidants Therapeutic Effect on PD

5.1. Glutathione

GSH is a tripeptide (cysteine, glycine, and glutamic acid) found in high concentrations in most cells’ mitochondrial and cytoplasmatic compartments. It is synthesized in the cytoplasm by the sequential addition of cysteine to glutamic acid, followed by glycine addition. GSH functions as an antioxidant, a free radical scavenger, and a detoxifying agent; it is a GSH peroxidase cofactor, acts as a substrate for GSH S-transferase, and maintains exogenous antioxidants, such as vitamins C and E, in their reduced (active) forms [99,100,101]. The cysteine’s sulfhydryl group is essential for GSH function as it participates in the reduction, oxidation, and conjugation reactions [102]. This antioxidant exists in two states: reduced (GSH) and oxidized (GSSG); in the reduced state, the cysteine’s thiol group can donate an electron to unstable molecules such as ROS; by donating this electron, the GSH oxidizes and reacts with another GSH to form GSH disulfide (GSSG). Therefore, the ratio of GSH/GSSG determines the cells’ redox status [103].
One of the biochemical alterations that had been detected in post-mortem brains of PD patients is the selective GSH reduction in the substantia nigra. In addition, the GSH/GSSG ratio was altered in favor of the oxidized form [104]. A similar pattern of GSH depletion has been found in incidental Lewy body diseases, which is considered a presymptomatic form of PD [105]. Additionally, under significant oxidative stress conditions as normal aging, decreased GSH leads to dopaminergic cell loss [106].
The reduction of GSH (by an irreversible inhibitor of g-glutamylcysteine synthase) potentiated the glutamate and NO cytotoxicity in rat mesencephalic dopaminergic cells [107]. Similarly, in mice, GSH depletion increased MPTP/MPP+ toxic effects, suggesting that an insufficient GSH pool may contribute to dopaminergic cell death in PD [108].
In vivo and in vitro experiments have shown that replenishing intracellular GSH levels can prevent oxidative damage and maintain mitochondrial function in dopaminergic cells [109], suggesting that restoring GSH levels in PD patients’ brains is a promising strategy to modify the disease’s progression.
Unfortunately, these effects have not been reproduced in clinical trials. Oral GSH supplementation with 500 mg twice daily for four weeks showed no changes in oxidative stress biomarkers, including GSH itself [110]. However, administering 1000 mg of GSH for six months increased plasma GSH levels by 35% [111]. Despite this, the restoration of the GSH pool remains challenging because of its physicochemical properties. Its high degradation rate in the gastrointestinal tract by γ-glutamyltransferase [112] reduces the probability to reach significant blood levels, and therefore enough concentration in CSF.
To avoid GSH first-pass loss in the digestive tract, it was administered intravenously to PD patients in two separate clinical trials. The first one showed symptomatic efficacy with two daily GSH doses of 600 mg for 30 days in a small group of newly diagnosed and untreated PD patients (Table 3) [113]. In the second study, PD patients whose motor symptoms were not well controlled with their medication regimen were subjected to GSH doses of 1400 mg three times a week for four weeks [114], finding that GSH was well-tolerated and safe and suggesting the possibility of a slight symptomatic effect. However, both studies’ symptomatic improvements should be verified in a more extensive study with more subjects to detect significant differences.
Alternative routes of GSH administration have been tested, including noninvasive intranasal delivery. A safety survey showed that 62% of the subjects experienced health benefits from GSH, while 12% reported adverse effects [115]. A phase I/IIa clinical study in PD patients showed that intranasal GSH was safe and well-tolerable over a three-month intervention period [116]. Phase IIb of the study reported predicted improvements in PD total and motor scores, although they were not significantly different from the placebo group. In addition, one participant developed cardiomyopathy [117], which may delay future studies.

5.2. N-Acetylcysteine (NAC)

Acetylcysteine is a synthetic N-acetyl derivative of the endogenous amino acid l-cysteine, a GSH precursor (PubChem). NAC has been used for more than 50 years in the clinic to replenish hepatic GSH after acetaminophen overdose [118], as a mucolytic in lung diseases [119], and as a disease modifier in infectious diseases [120]. NAC’s antioxidant activity is attributed to its rapid reaction with OH•, NO2•, CO3, and thiyl radicals, as well as to the detoxification of semiquinones, hypochlorous acid (HOCl), nitroxyl (HNO), and heavy metals [45].
NAC is a membrane-permeable cysteine precursor. Since neurons cannot take up GSH itself, NAC is a potential cysteine source necessary to stimulate enzymes involved in the brain’s GSH generation, representing a promising therapeutic molecule in treating PD. NAC’s beneficial effect has been shown in human cortical cells exposed to toxic agents and inducers of neuronal death, where mitochondrial homeostasis, and consequently apoptosis inhibition, was observed [121]. Additionally, several beneficial effects have been observed in vivo, including increased endogenous GSH levels in cortical synaptosome, which are sites of increased oxidative stress in neurodegeneration [122]; increased Complex I activity in aged mice synaptic mitochondria [123]; improved cytochrome C oxidase in young and old mice [124]; and even GSH oral administration protected from the loss of dopaminergic cells in α-synuclein (αSyn) overexpressing mice [125].
However, NAC has a low oral bioavailability estimated at 6–10% due to extensive first-pass metabolism [126]. After an hour, a single oral dose of NAC 200 to 400 mg reaches the peak plasma concentration of 0.35 to 4 mg/L and has a half-life of 6.25 h after administration [126]. When administered intravenously, systemically, NAC binds to plasma proteins, and about 30% undergoes renal elimination resulting in a short half-life [45,126]. Importantly, increasing systemic doses of NAC to raise its transport across the brain-blood barrier may increase blood pressure [127].
Nevertheless, preclinical studies suggest NAC’s potential effectiveness as a PD modifier and have led to performing some clinical trials (Table 3). In a trial with Parkinson’s and Gaucher’s disease patients, brain GSH levels were quantified by magnetic resonance spectroscopy after a single intravenous infusion of 150 mg/kg NAC; although GSH was increased in all subjects, it returned to basal levels after 120 min [128]. A pilot study was performed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of NAC intravenous and oral administration; the data obtained suggested that NAC might be positively impacting dopamine function and potentially clinical symptoms [129]. Each subject was provided with 3000 mg NAC twice a day (6000 mg total) for four weeks in a prospective study. The results of this study showed that, although repeated oral doses of NAC increased the antioxidants (GSH/GSSG) peripherical levels, the indicators of oxidative damage (lipid peroxidation) remained unchanged, and the GSH brain levels did not increase significantly [130]. The most recent clinical trial recruited PD patients, who received a combined oral and intravenous NAC administration for three months. Afterward, patients were evaluated by SPECT imaging and UPRDS (Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale) score, which showed that NAC improved dopamine transporter (DAT) binding in PD patients, correlating with improvement symptoms [131].
Table
Table 3. Summary of Glutathione and NAC antioxidants effect on PD clinical trials.
Table 3. Summary of Glutathione and NAC antioxidants effect on PD clinical trials.
AntioxidantStudy DesignClinical TrialSubjects (n)Primary OutcomesReferences
GlutathionePilot evaluationPhase I9GSH has symptomatic effects and possibly retards the progression of the disease[113]
Randomized, Double-Blind, Pilot EvaluationPhase I11 + 10Safe and well-tolerated[114]
Randomized, double-blindPhase I/IIa15 + 15These data support the safety and tolerability of intranasal GSH in this population
Pharmacokinetic and dose-finding studies are warranted		[115,116]
Double-blind placebo-controlledPhase IIb45All cohorts improved over the intervention period, although neither treatment group was superior to the placebo
N-AcetylcysteineInterventional Open labelPhase I6 + 2↑GSH redox ratios
↑ Brain GSH		[128]
Single-centerPhase I12Orally ↑ CSF NAC concentrations[132]
Randomized open-labelNA (preliminary)65↑ DAT binding in the caudate and putamen[129]
Randomized controlled trialNA65↑ DAT binding in patients with PD
↓ UPDRS score		[131]

6. Vitamin Therapeutic Effect on PD

6.1. Vitamin C

Vitamin C (Vit C), also known as ascorbic acid, ascorbate, or L-ascorbate, is a natural water-soluble vitamin that plays significant roles as a free radical scavenger and as a cofactor of several enzymes reactions, including catecholamine synthesis [133]. Its effect as an antioxidant comes from its actions as a non-enzymatic reducer of O2•−, hydroxyl (HO•), alkoxyl (RO•), peroxyl (ROO•), and other radicals [134]. Vit C also reacts with the radical tocopheroxyl, which results from Vitamin E oxidation when it scavenges free radicals in lipid membranes, regenerating Vitamin E (Vit E) [135].
Unlike most molecular low-weight compounds, the absorption, distribution, and metabolism of Vit C are complex. Its uptake in tissues and distribution mainly occurs through the sodium-dependent vitamin C transporter family of proteins [136]. These transporters’ differential expression between tissues leads to nonlinear pharmacokinetics of Vit C under physiological conditions, and its distribution is highly compartmentalized [137]. Vit C distribution pattern has a wide range of concentrations in the different tissues ranging from 0.2 mM in muscle and heart to 10 mM in the adrenal glands and brain [138].
The brain is one of the organs with the highest Vit C concentration [139]. However, it has a variable distribution in different brain regions, and the motor circuit-related sites receive the least Vit C concentration [140]. The brain has specific transporters for its reduced (SVCT2, sodium-dependent vitamin C transporter-2) and oxidized form (GLUT family) [136].
Low plasma levels of exogenous antioxidants (including Vit C) have been reported in patients with neurodegenerative diseases such as PD [141]. A higher prevalence of PD with subclinical Vit C deficiencies has also been received [142]. The monitoring of Vit C levels in lymphocytes has been suggested as a potential biomarker of PD progression [143].
The above suggests that Vit C supplementation is a potential therapeutic adjuvant in PD treatment. Positive results in PD experimental models have supported this theory. The supplementation with Vit C had a neuroprotective effect against levodopa’s neurotoxicity in vitro [144]. Vit C high doses and long treatments induced neuroprotection but physiological side effects in a fly model [145]. Vit C supplementation in 6-OHDA-lesioned rats showed an increase in dopaminergic neurons [146].
However, when Vit C was tested in the clinical trials, its effects were not reproduced. Vit C’s dietary intakes were related to a decreased PD risk in two large cohort prospective studies; however, this effect was not substantial in a 4-year lag analysis [147,148] (Table 4). A pilot clinical trial showed that a high dosage of Vit C and α-tocopherol, which is the most prevalent form of Vit E, delayed the start of levodopa therapy up to 2.5 years in newly diagnosed PD patients [149]; Vit C intake also modified the levodopa pharmacological kinetics in PD patients, increasing its absorption and bioavailability [150]. However, Vit C did not significantly reduce the risk of developing PD [29].

6.2. Vitamin E

Vit E is the generic term for eight substances or trocochromanols, four tocopherols, four tocotrienols [123], and the major lipid-soluble antioxidant [151]. As this vitamin cannot be synthesized in the human body, it must be supplied by the diet. The antioxidant effects exerted by each Vit E isoform are complicated, and their mechanisms are still not well understood. However, researchers theorize that Vit E may protect key cell components by reducing free radicals and breaking lipid peroxidation chain reaction. Thus, cell membranes are protected by lipid repair and replacement [152].
As mentioned above, the antioxidant effects of Vit E and its mechanism of action are not well understood. Vit E absorption efficiency varies from 10 to 33% [153] and is affected by several factors including the food matrix, genetic factors, and metabolic fate, altering its bioavailability [154].
Preclinical studies of PD have yielded controversial results regarding Vit E’s usefulness as a disease modifier. Vit E deficiency increased MPTP toxicity in the substantia nigra, while partially protected from neurotransmitter and metabolite depletion induced by MPTP in the striatum [155]. However, systemic administration of Vit E did not protect mice against MPTP toxicity [156]. Even α-tocopherol treatment before MPTP administration was unable to attenuate dopamine depletion [157]. Other studies support the theory that high Vit E doses partially protect dopaminergic neurons against MPTP-mediated toxicity; however, this protective effect ended once the antioxidant administration was stopped [158].
The multicenter controlled clinical trial Deprenyl and Tocopherol Antioxidative Therapy of Parkinsonism (DATATOP) recruited early and untreated PD patients (Table 4), who received deprenyl (10 mg per day) and tocopherol (2000 UI per day). Deprenyl (monoamine oxidase inhibitor) delayed for almost nine months the development of disability requiring levodopa therapy. However, the slight motor performance improvement became slightly worse upon deprenyl withdrawal. Nevertheless, there was no beneficial effect of tocopherol or any interaction between tocopherol and deprenyl [159].
Vit C and α-tocopherol combined administration delayed the start of levodopa therapy by 2.5 years in newly diagnosed PD patients [149].
Table
Table 4. Summary of vitamins antioxidant effects on PD clinical trials.
Table 4. Summary of vitamins antioxidant effects on PD clinical trials.
AntioxidantStudy DesignClinical TrialSubjects (n)Primary OutcomesReference
Vitamin CProspective cohort study 76,890Do not reduce the risk of PD[147]
Comparative studyPhase I67↑ Absorption and bioavailability of levodopa[150]
Randomized Double-blind Controlled TrialPhase II76Extend the time necessary to start levodopa therapy to 2.5 years[149]
Deprenyl and TocopherolPlacebo-ControlledPhase I800There was no beneficial effect of tocopherol or any interaction between tocopherol and deprenyl[159]
Double-blind, randomized clinicalPhase II199 + 191↓ UPDRS score[160]
Prospective cohort study 1032↓ Parkinson’s disease risk (this result was not significant in a 4-y lag analysis)[148]

7. Conclusions

Oxidative stress has long been considered one of the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in PD, which has led to the investigation of the antioxidant systems as a promising therapy more than two decades ago. A useful antioxidant must meet specific characteristics; it must be capable of interacting with biologically relevant oxidants and free radicals; its reaction by-products should be harmless; and, finally, it must reach a sufficiently high concentration in the tissue and cell compartments to ensure that its activity is quantitatively relevant.
Various antioxidants’ administration has successfully maintained neuronal survival and preserved and improved the neurons’ antioxidant system’s activity in preclinical PD models. Unfortunately, when the experimental models are translated into clinical trials, these therapies have been less effective. However, the failed non-enzymatic antioxidants’ clinical trials in PD do not necessarily rule out the possibility of success in the future. What are the current challenges and opportunities? Despite the mechanistic evolutionary similarities between humans and rodents, which are the primary choice for research, lab rodents are syngeneic and are maintained under control conditions, while the heterogeneous human nature of PD complicates the outcome. In addition, the promising antioxidant effects observed in animal PD models cannot be translated into clinical trials because preclinical studies usually use young animals. Aged animal models are more suitable to analyze the antioxidant effect on PD. In addition, 25% of the cases diagnosed as PD are incorrect [161]. Since no objective molecular or biochemical tests exist for PD, its diagnosis is based on clinical criteria, mainly cardinal motor symptoms [162], which manifest when patients have lost about 60–80% of dopaminergic neurons [163]. Clinical trials usually include patients in advanced PD stages, with a considerable dopaminergic neuronal loss, and antioxidant therapy hardly made a significant difference. Until an accurate diagnosis method is available to discern between early, moderated, and advanced PD stages, antioxidant therapy’s real effectiveness will be determined. Current challenges for translational medicine include short antioxidant half-life, subcellular compartment-specific targeting delivery (Figure 3), suitable antioxidant bioavailability, high redox reaction rate, and specificity between antioxidants and oxidants. Antioxidant bioavailability is related to the antioxidant structure, interaction with other molecules, half-life, and delivery efficiency into the brain. Increasing the antioxidant dosage would not necessarily increase its tissue-specific concentration; it actually may produce adverse effects. To improve the antioxidant half-life, tissue-specific delivery, and bioavailability, antioxidants can be incorporated into a biocompatible substrate to surpass the administration limitations and increase its therapeutic effect.
Recently, antioxidant delivery and transportation systems were developed for specific subcellular targeting [164] by encapsulation into liposomes or linkage to nanoparticles including nanovesicles, solid lipid nanoparticles, nanostructured lipid carriers, nanoemulsions, and polymeric nanoparticles to make them more stable [165,166] or encapsulate them into liposomes. These are up-and-coming systems to be evaluated in preclinical and clinical studies to obtain the most significant antioxidants benefits, with the least toxicity and side effects.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

A.P.D.-J. (No. CVU: 708195) and Y.G.C. (No. CVU: 856246) received a scholarship from the National Council of Science and Technology (Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, CONACYT).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. de Rijk, M.C.; Launer, L.J.; Berger, K.; Breteler, M.M.; Dartigues, J.F.; Baldereschi, M.; Fratiglioni, L.; Lobo, A.; Martinez-Lage, J.; Trenkwalder, C.; et al. Prevalence of Parkinson’s disease in Europe: A collaborative study of population-based cohorts. Neurologic Diseases in the Elderly Research Group. Neurology 2000, 54, S21–S23. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Rajput, A.H. Frequency and cause of Parkinson’s disease. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 1992, 19, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Darweesh, S.K.; Koudstaal, P.J.; Stricker, B.H.; Hofman, A.; Ikram, M.A. Trends in the Incidence of Parkinson Disease in the General Population: The Rotterdam Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2016, 183, 1018–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Braak, H.; Del Tredici, K.; Rüb, U.; de Vos, R.A.; Jansen Steur, E.N.; Braak, E. Staging of brain pathology related to sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 2003, 24, 197–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Przedborski, S. Pathogenesis of nigral cell death in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 2005, 11 (Suppl. 1), S3–S7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. He, J.; Zhu, G.; Wang, G.; Zhang, F. Oxidative Stress and Neuroinflammation Potentiate Each Other to Promote Progression of Dopamine Neurodegeneration. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2020, 2020, 6137521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Banati, R.B.; Daniel, S.E.; Blunt, S.B. Glial pathology but absence of apoptotic nigral neurons in long-standing Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 1998, 13, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Damier, P.; Hirsch, E.C.; Zhang, P.; Agid, Y.; Javoy-Agid, F. Glutathione peroxidase, glial cells and Parkinson’s disease. Neuroscience 1993, 52, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mogi, M.; Harada, M.; Riederer, P.; Narabayashi, H.; Fujita, K.; Nagatsu, T. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) increases both in the brain and in the cerebrospinal fluid from parkinsonian patients. Neurosci. Lett. 1994, 165, 208–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Knott, C.; Stern, G.; Wilkin, G.P. Inflammatory regulators in Parkinson’s disease: iNOS, lipocortin-1, and cyclooxygenases-1 and -2. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2000, 16, 724–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Reed, T.T. Lipid peroxidation and neurodegenerative disease. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2011, 51, 1302–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ramalingam, M.; Kim, S.J. Reactive oxygen/nitrogen species and their functional correlations in neurodegenerative diseases. J. Neural Transm. 2012, 119, 891–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yoritaka, A.; Hattori, N.; Uchida, K.; Tanaka, M.; Stadtman, E.R.; Mizuno, Y. Immunohistochemical detection of 4-hydroxynonenal protein adducts in Parkinson disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 2696–2701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Khan, Z.; Ali, S.A. Oxidative stress-related biomarkers in Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Iran. J. Neurol. 2018, 17, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Alam, Z.I.; Daniel, S.E.; Lees, A.J.; Marsden, D.C.; Jenner, P.; Halliwell, B. A generalised increase in protein carbonyls in the brain in Parkinson’s but not incidental Lewy body disease. J. Neurochem. 1997, 69, 1326–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Good, P.F.; Hsu, A.; Werner, P.; Perl, D.P.; Olanow, C.W. Protein nitration in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 1998, 57, 338–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Klein, J.A.; Ackerman, S.L. Oxidative stress, cell cycle, and neurodegeneration. J. Clin. Investig. 2003, 111, 785–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Du, H.; Yan, S.S. Mitochondrial medicine for neurodegenerative diseases. Int. J. Biochem. Cell. Biol. 2010, 42, 560–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Kannan, K.; Jain, S.K. Oxidative stress and apoptosis. Pathophysiology 2000, 7, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Giasson, B.I.; Duda, J.E.; Murray, I.V.; Chen, Q.; Souza, J.M.; Hurtig, H.I.; Ischiropoulos, H.; Trojanowski, J.Q.; Lee, V.M. Oxidative damage linked to neurodegeneration by selective alpha-synuclein nitration in synucleinopathy lesions. Science 2000, 290, 985–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jenner, P.; Olanow, C.W. The pathogenesis of cell death in Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 2006, 66, S24–S36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nimse, S.B.; Pal, D. Free radicals, natural antioxidants, and their reaction mechanisms. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 27986–28006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Swallow, A.J. Radiation Chemistry of Organic Compounds. In Radiation Chemistry of Organic Compounds; Thomson, S., Ed.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK, 1960. [Google Scholar]
  24. Tanaka, M.; Vécsei, L. Monitoring the Redox Status in Multiple Sclerosis. Biomedicines 2020, 8, 406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Quinn, M.T.; Ammons, M.C.; Deleo, F.R. The expanding role of NADPH oxidases in health and disease: No longer just agents of death and destruction. Clin. Sci. 2006, 111, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Cairns, R.A.; Harris, I.S.; Mak, T.W. Regulation of cancer cell metabolism. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2011, 11, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Brookes, P.S.; Yoon, Y.; Robotham, J.L.; Anders, M.W.; Sheu, S.S. Calcium, ATP, and ROS: A mitochondrial love-hate triangle. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2004, 287, C817–C833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Lambeth, J.D. NOX enzymes and the biology of reactive oxygen. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2004, 4, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. McCord, J.M.; Fridovich, I. The utility of superoxide dismutase in studying free radical reactions. I. Radicals generated by the interaction of sulfite, dimethyl sulfoxide, and oxygen. J. Biol. Chem. 1969, 244, 6056–6063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hjalmarsson, K.; Marklund, S.L.; Engström, A.; Edlund, T. Isolation and sequence of complementary DNA encoding human extracellular superoxide dismutase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1987, 84, 6340–6344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Salvi, M.; Battaglia, V.; Brunati, A.M.; La Rocca, N.; Tibaldi, E.; Pietrangeli, P.; Marcocci, L.; Mondovì, B.; Rossi, C.A.; Toninello, A. Catalase takes part in rat liver mitochondria oxidative stress defense. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 24407–24415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Netto, L.E.S.; Chae, H.Z.; Kang, S.W.; Rhee, S.G.; Stadtman, E.R. Removal of hydrogen peroxide by thiol-specific antioxidant enzyme (TSA) is involved with its antioxidant properties. TSA possesses thiol peroxidase activity. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 15315–15321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Flohe, L.; Günzler, W.A.; Schock, H.H. Glutathione peroxidase: A selenoenzyme. FEBS Lett. 1973, 32, 132–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Lynch, R.E.; Fridovich, I. Permeation of the erythrocyte stroma by superoxide radical. J. Biol. Chem. 1978, 253, 4697–4699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ramasarma, T. Generation of H2O in biomembranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1982, 694, 69–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zigler, J.S.; Jernigan, H.M.; Garland, D.; Reddy, V.N. The effects of “oxygen radicals” generated in the medium on lenses in organ culture: Inhibition of damage by chelated iron. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1985, 241, 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Radi, R. Nitric oxide, oxidants, and protein tyrosine nitration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 4003–4008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Huie, R.E.; Padmaja, S. The reaction of no with superoxide. Free Radic. Res. Commun. 1993, 18, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Radi, R.; Rodriguez, M.; Castro, L.; Telleri, R. Inhibition of mitochondrial electron transport by peroxynitrite. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1994, 308, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Botti, H.; Batthyány, C.; Trostchansky, A.; Radi, R.; Freeman, B.A.; Rubbo, H. Peroxynitrite-mediated alpha-tocopherol oxidation in low-density lipoprotein: A mechanistic approach. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2004, 36, 152–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Kelso, G.F.; Porteous, C.M.; Coulter, C.V.; Hughes, G.; Porteous, W.K.; Ledgerwood, E.C.; Smith, R.A.; Murphy, M.P. Selective targeting of a redox-active ubiquinone to mitochondria within cells: Antioxidant and antiapoptotic properties. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 4588–4596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Crane, F.L. Biochemical functions of coenzyme Q10. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2001, 20, 591–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kohen, R.; Yamamoto, Y.; Cundy, K.C.; Ames, B.N. Antioxidant activity of carnosine, homocarnosine, and anserine present in muscle and brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1988, 85, 3175–3179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Zhang, N.; Shu, H.Y.; Huang, T.; Zhang, Q.L.; Li, D.; Zhang, G.Q.; Peng, X.Y.; Liu, C.F.; Luo, W.F.; Hu, L.F. Nrf2 signaling contributes to the neuroprotective effects of urate against 6-OHDA toxicity. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e100286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Samuni, Y.; Goldstein, S.; Dean, O.M.; Berk, M. The chemistry and biological activities of N-acetylcysteine. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1830, 4117–4129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Beutler, E. Nutritional and metabolic aspects of glutathione. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 1989, 9, 287–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Sies, H.; Stahl, W. Vitamins E and C, beta-carotene, and other carotenoids as antioxidants. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1995, 62, 1315S–1321S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ernster, L.; Dallner, G. Biochemical, physiological and medical aspects of ubiquinone function. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1995, 1271, 195–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Bhagavan, H.N.; Chopra, R.K. Coenzyme Q10: Absorption, tissue uptake, metabolism and pharmacokinetics. Free Radic. Res. 2006, 40, 445–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kaikkonen, J.; Nyyssönen, K.; Tuomainen, T.P.; Ristonmaa, U.; Salonen, J.T. Determinants of plasma coenzyme Q10 in humans. FEBS Lett. 1999, 443, 163–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Chopra, R.K.; Goldman, R.; Sinatra, S.T.; Bhagavan, H.N. Relative bioavailability of coenzyme Q10 formulations in human subjects. Int. J. Vitam. Nutr. Res. 1998, 68, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  52. López-Lluch, G.; Del Pozo-Cruz, J.; Sánchez-Cuesta, A.; Cortés-Rodríguez, A.B.; Navas, P. Bioavailability of coenzyme Q10 supplements depends on carrier lipids and solubilization. Nutrition 2019, 57, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Weis, M.; Mortensen, S.A.; Rassing, M.R.; Møller-Sonnergaard, J.; Poulsen, G.; Rasmussen, S.N. Bioavailability of four oral coenzyme Q10 formulations in healthy volunteers. Mol. Asp. Med. 1994, 15, s273–s280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bhagavan, H.N.; Chopra, R.K. Plasma coenzyme Q10 response to oral ingestion of coenzyme Q10 formulations. Mitochondrion 2007, 7, S78–S88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mantle, D.; Hargreaves, I. Coenzyme Q10 and Degenerative Disorders Affecting Longevity: An Overview. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Matthews, R.T.; Yang, L.; Browne, S.; Baik, M.; Beal, M.F. Coenzyme Q10 administration increases brain mitochondrial concentrations and exerts neuroprotective effects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 8892–8897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Eggens, I.; Elmberger, P.G.; Löw, P. Polyisoprenoid, cholesterol and ubiquinone levels in human hepatocellular carcinomas. Br. J. Exp. Pathol. 1989, 70, 83–92. [Google Scholar]
  58. Alkholy, U.M.; Abdalmonem, N.; Zaki, A.; Elkoumi, M.A.; Hashim, M.I.A.; Basset, M.A.A.; Salah, H.E. The antioxidant status of coenzyme Q10 and vitamin E in children with type 1 diabetes. J. Pediatr. 2019, 95, 224–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Compta, Y.; Giraldo, D.M.; Muñoz, E.; Antonelli, F.; Fernández, M.; Bravo, P.; Soto, M.; Cámara, A.; Torres, F.; Martí, M.J.; et al. Cerebrospinal fluid levels of coenzyme Q10 are reduced in multiple system atrophy. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 2018, 46, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Mischley, L.K.; Allen, J.; Bradley, R. Coenzyme Q10 deficiency in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurol. Sci. 2012, 318, 72–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Hargreaves, I.P.; Lane, A.; Sleiman, P.M. The coenzyme Q10 status of the brain regions of Parkinson’s disease patients. Neurosci. Lett. 2008, 447, 17–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Sohmiya, M.; Tanaka, M.; Tak, N.W.; Yanagisawa, M.; Tanino, Y.; Suzuki, Y.; Okamoto, K.; Yamamoto, Y. Redox status of plasma coenzyme Q10 indicates elevated systemic oxidative stress in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurol. Sci. 2004, 223, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Shults, C.W.; Haas, R.H.; Passov, D.; Beal, M.F. Coenzyme Q10 levels correlate with the activities of complexes I and II/III in mitochondria from parkinsonian and nonparkinsonian subjects. Ann. Neurol. 1997, 42, 261–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Gille, G.; Hung, S.T.; Reichmann, H.; Rausch, W.D. Oxidative stress to dopaminergic neurons as models of Parkinson’s disease. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2004, 1018, 533–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Sherer, T.B.; Betarbet, R.; Testa, C.M.; Seo, B.B.; Richardson, J.R.; Kim, J.H.; Miller, G.W.; Yagi, T.; Matsuno-Yagi, A.; Greenamyre, J.T. Mechanism of toxicity in rotenone models of Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23, 10756–10764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Horvath, T.L.; Diano, S.; Leranth, C.; Garcia-Segura, L.M.; Cowley, M.A.; Shanabrough, M.; Elsworth, J.D.; Sotonyi, P.; Roth, R.H.; Dietrich, E.H.; et al. Coenzyme Q induces nigral mitochondrial uncoupling and prevents dopamine cell loss in a primate model of Parkinson’s disease. Endocrinology 2003, 144, 2757–2760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Strijks, E.; Kremer, H.P.; Horstink, M.W. Q10 therapy in patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Mol. Asp. Med. 1997, 18, S237–S240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Shults, C.W.; Beal, M.F.; Fontaine, D.; Nakano, K.; Haas, R.H. Absorption, tolerability, and effects on mitochondrial activity of oral coenzyme Q10 in parkinsonian patients. Neurology 1998, 50, 793–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Shults, C.W.; Oakes, D.; Kieburtz, K.; Beal, M.F.; Haas, R.; Plumb, S.; Juncos, J.L.; Nutt, J.; Shoulson, I.; Carter, J.; et al. Effects of coenzyme Q10 in early Parkinson disease: Evidence of slowing of the functional decline. Arch. Neurol. 2002, 59, 1541–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Beal, M.F.; Oakes, D.; Shoulson, I.; Henchcliffe, C.; Galpern, W.R.; Haas, R.; Juncos, J.L.; Nutt, J.G.; Voss, T.S.; Ravina, B.; et al. A randomized clinical trial of high-dosage coenzyme Q10 in early Parkinson disease: No evidence of benefit. JAMA Neurol. 2014, 71, 543–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Yoritaka, A.; Kawajiri, S.; Yamamoto, Y.; Nakahara, T.; Ando, M.; Hashimoto, K.; Nagase, M.; Saito, Y.; Hattori, N. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial of reduced coenzyme Q10 for Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 2015, 21, 911–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Negida, A.; Menshawy, A.; El Ashal, G.; Elfouly, Y.; Hani, Y.; Hegazy, Y.; El Ghonimy, S.; Fouda, S.; Rashad, Y. Coenzyme Q10 for Patients with Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets 2016, 15, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Prasuhn, J.; Brüggemann, N.; Hessler, N.; Berg, D.; Gasser, T.; Brockmann, K.; Olbrich, D.; Ziegler, A.; König, I.R.; Klein, C.; et al. An omics-based strategy using coenzyme Q10 in patients with Parkinson’s disease: Concept evaluation in a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled parallel group trial. Neurol. Res. Pract. 2019, 1, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Li, Y.; Zhang, H.; Fawcett, J.P.; Tucker, I.G. Quantitation and metabolism of mitoquinone, a mitochondria-targeted antioxidant, in rat by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2007, 21, 1958–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Smith, R.A.; Porteous, C.M.; Gane, A.M.; Murphy, M.P. Delivery of bioactive molecules to mitochondria in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 5407–5412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Murphy, M.P.; Smith, R.A. Targeting antioxidants to mitochondria by conjugation to lipophilic cations. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2007, 47, 629–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. James, A.M.; Cochemé, H.M.; Smith, R.A.; Murphy, M.P. Interactions of mitochondria-targeted and untargeted ubiquinones with the mitochondrial respiratory chain and reactive oxygen species. Implications for the use of exogenous ubiquinones as therapies and experimental tools. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 21295–21312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Solesio, M.E.; Prime, T.A.; Logan, A.; Murphy, M.P.; Del Mar Arroyo-Jimenez, M.; Jordán, J.; Galindo, M.F. The mitochondria-targeted anti-oxidant MitoQ reduces aspects of mitochondrial fission in the 6-OHDA cell model of Parkinson’s disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1832, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Ghosh, A.; Chandran, K.; Kalivendi, S.V.; Joseph, J.; Antholine, W.E.; Hillard, C.J.; Kanthasamy, A.; Kalyanaraman, B. Neuroprotection by a mitochondria-targeted drug in a Parkinson’s disease model. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2010, 49, 1674–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Snow, B.J.; Rolfe, F.L.; Lockhart, M.M.; Frampton, C.M.; O’Sullivan, J.D.; Fung, V.; Smith, R.A.; Murphy, M.P.; Taylor, K.M.; Group, P.S. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the mitochondria-targeted antioxidant MitoQ as a disease-modifying therapy in Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 2010, 25, 1670–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Boldyrev, A.A.; Aldini, G.; Derave, W. Physiology and pathophysiology of carnosine. Physiol. Rev. 2013, 93, 1803–1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Kubota, M.; Kobayashi, N.; Sugizaki, T.; Shimoda, M.; Kawahara, M.; Tanaka, K.I. Carnosine suppresses neuronal cell death and inflammation induced by 6-hydroxydopamine in an in vitro model of Parkinson’s disease. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0240448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Yuneva, A.O.; Kramarenko, G.G.; Vetreshchak, T.V.; Gallant, S.; Boldyrev, A.A. Effect of carnosine on Drosophila melanogaster lifespan. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 2002, 133, 559–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Bermúdez, M.L.; Seroogy, K.B.; Genter, M.B. Evaluation of Carnosine Intervention in the Thy1-aSyn Mouse Model of Parkinson’s Disease. Neuroscience 2019, 411, 270–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Boldyrev, A.; Fedorova, T.; Stepanova, M.; Dobrotvorskaya, I.; Kozlova, E.; Boldanova, N.; Bagyeva, G.; Ivanova-Smolenskaya, I.; Illarioshkin, S. Carnosine increases efficiency of DOPA therapy of Parkinson’s disease: A pilot study. Rejuvenation Res. 2008, 11, 821–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Gong, L.; Zhang, Q.L.; Zhang, N.; Hua, W.Y.; Huang, Y.X.; Di, P.W.; Huang, T.; Xu, X.S.; Liu, C.F.; Hu, L.F.; et al. Neuroprotection by urate on 6-OHDA-lesioned rat model of Parkinson’s disease: Linking to Akt/GSK3β signaling pathway. J. Neurochem. 2012, 123, 876–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Yeum, K.J.; Russell, R.M.; Krinsky, N.I.; Aldini, G. Biomarkers of antioxidant capacity in the hydrophilic and lipophilic compartments of human plasma. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2004, 430, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Becker, B.F. Towards the physiological function of uric acid. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1993, 14, 615–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Guerreiro, S.; Ponceau, A.; Toulorge, D.; Martin, E.; Alvarez-Fischer, D.; Hirsch, E.C.; Michel, P.P. Protection of midbrain dopaminergic neurons by the end-product of purine metabolism uric acid: Potentiation by low-level depolarization. J. Neurochem. 2009, 109, 1118–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hink, H.U.; Santanam, N.; Dikalov, S.; McCann, L.; Nguyen, A.D.; Parthasarathy, S.; Harrison, D.G.; Fukai, T. Peroxidase properties of extracellular superoxide dismutase: Role of uric acid in modulating in vivo activity. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2002, 22, 1402–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Davies, K.J.; Sevanian, A.; Muakkassah-Kelly, S.F.; Hochstein, P. Uric acid-iron ion complexes. A new aspect of the antioxidant functions of uric acid. Biochem. J. 1986, 235, 747–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Niklasson, F.; Hetta, J.; Degrell, I. Hypoxanthine, xanthine, urate and creatinine concentration gradients in cerebrospinal fluid. Ups. J. Med. Sci. 1988, 93, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Cipriani, S.; Desjardins, C.A.; Burdett, T.C.; Xu, Y.; Xu, K.; Schwarzschild, M.A. Urate and its transgenic depletion modulate neuronal vulnerability in a cellular model of Parkinson’s disease. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e37331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. de Lau, L.M.; Koudstaal, P.J.; Hofman, A.; Breteler, M.M. Serum uric acid levels and the risk of Parkinson disease. Ann. Neurol. 2005, 58, 797–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Ascherio, A.; LeWitt, P.A.; Xu, K.; Eberly, S.; Watts, A.; Matson, W.R.; Marras, C.; Kieburtz, K.; Rudolph, A.; Bogdanov, M.B.; et al. Urate as a predictor of the rate of clinical decline in Parkinson disease. Arch. Neurol. 2009, 66, 1460–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Zhu, T.G.; Wang, X.X.; Luo, W.F.; Zhang, Q.L.; Huang, T.T.; Xu, X.S.; Liu, C.F. Protective effects of urate against 6-OHDA-induced cell injury in PC12 cells through antioxidant action. Neurosci. Lett. 2012, 506, 175–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Bhattacharyya, S.; Bakshi, R.; Logan, R.; Ascherio, A.; Macklin, E.A.; Schwarzschild, M.A. Oral Inosine Persistently Elevates Plasma antioxidant capacity in Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 2016, 31, 417–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Schwarzschild, M.A.; Macklin, E.A.; Bakshi, R.; Battacharyya, S.; Logan, R.; Espay, A.J.; Hung, A.Y.; Bwala, G.; Goetz, C.G.; Russell, D.S.; et al. Sex differences by design and outcome in the Safety of Urate Elevation in PD (SURE-PD) trial. Neurology 2019, 93, e1328–e1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Fernández-Checa, J.C.; Kaplowitz, N.; García-Ruiz, C.; Colell, A. Mitochondrial glutathione: Importance and transport. Semin. Liver Dis. 1998, 18, 389–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Ursini, F.; Bindoli, A. The role of selenium peroxidases in the protection against oxidative damage of membranes. Chem. Phys. Lipids 1987, 44, 255–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Pompella, A.; Visvikis, A.; Paolicchi, A.; De Tata, V.; Casini, A.F. The changing faces of glutathione, a cellular protagonist. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2003, 66, 1499–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Meister, A. Biosynthesis and functions of glutathione, an essential biofactor. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 1992, 38, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Pizzorno, J. Glutathione! Integr. Med. 2014, 13, 8–12. [Google Scholar]
  104. Sian, J.; Dexter, D.T.; Lees, A.J.; Daniel, S.; Agid, Y.; Javoy-Agid, F.; Jenner, P.; Marsden, C.D. Alterations in glutathione levels in Parkinson’s disease and other neurodegenerative disorders affecting basal ganglia. Ann. Neurol. 1994, 36, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Dexter, D.T.; Sian, J.; Rose, S.; Hindmarsh, J.G.; Mann, V.M.; Cooper, J.M.; Wells, F.R.; Daniel, S.E.; Lees, A.J.; Schapira, A.H. Indices of oxidative stress and mitochondrial function in individuals with incidental Lewy body disease. Ann. Neurol. 1994, 35, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Chinta, S.J.; Kumar, M.J.; Hsu, M.; Rajagopalan, S.; Kaur, D.; Rane, A.; Nicholls, D.G.; Choi, J.; Andersen, J.K. Inducible alterations of glutathione levels in adult dopaminergic midbrain neurons result in nigrostriatal degeneration. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27, 13997–14006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Ibi, M.; Sawada, H.; Kume, T.; Katsuki, H.; Kaneko, S.; Shimohama, S.; Akaike, A. Depletion of intracellular glutathione increases susceptibility to nitric oxide in mesencephalic dopaminergic neurons. J. Neurochem. 1999, 73, 1696–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Wüllner, U.; Löschmann, P.A.; Schulz, J.B.; Schmid, A.; Dringen, R.; Eblen, F.; Turski, L.; Klockgether, T. Glutathione depletion potentiates MPTP and MPP+ toxicity in nigral dopaminergic neurones. Neuroreport 1996, 7, 921–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Pradhan, P.; Majhi, O.; Biswas, A.; Joshi, V.K.; Sinha, D. Enhanced accumulation of reduced glutathione by Scopoletin improves survivability of dopaminergic neurons in Parkinson’s model. Cell Death Dis. 2020, 11, 739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Allen, J.; Bradley, R.D. Effects of oral glutathione supplementation on systemic oxidative stress biomarkers in human volunteers. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2011, 17, 827–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Richie, J.P.; Nichenametla, S.; Neidig, W.; Calcagnotto, A.; Haley, J.S.; Schell, T.D.; Muscat, J.E. Randomized controlled trial of oral glutathione supplementation on body stores of glutathione. Eur. J. Nutr. 2015, 54, 251–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Witschi, A.; Reddy, S.; Stofer, B.; Lauterburg, B.H. The systemic availability of oral glutathione. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 1992, 43, 667–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Sechi, G.; Deledda, M.G.; Bua, G.; Satta, W.M.; Deiana, G.A.; Pes, G.M.; Rosati, G. Reduced intravenous glutathione in the treatment of early Parkinson’s disease. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 1996, 20, 1159–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Hauser, R.A.; Lyons, K.E.; McClain, T.; Carter, S.; Perlmutter, D. Randomized, double-blind, pilot evaluation of intravenous glutathione in Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 2009, 24, 979–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Mischley, L.K.; Vespignani, M.F.; Finnell, J.S. Safety survey of intranasal glutathione. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2013, 19, 459–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Mischley, L.K.; Leverenz, J.B.; Lau, R.C.; Polissar, N.L.; Neradilek, M.B.; Samii, A.; Standish, L.J. A randomized, double-blind phase I/IIa study of intranasal glutathione in Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 2015, 30, 1696–1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Mischley, L.K.; Lau, R.C.; Shankland, E.G.; Wilbur, T.K.; Padowski, J.M. Phase IIb Study of Intranasal Glutathione in Parkinson’s Disease. J. Parkinsons Dis. 2017, 7, 289–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Smilkstein, M.J.; Knapp, G.L.; Kulig, K.W.; Rumack, B.H. Efficacy of oral N-acetylcysteine in the treatment of acetaminophen overdose. Analysis of the national multicenter study (1976 to 1985). N. Engl. J. Med. 1988, 319, 1557–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Moldéus, P.; Cotgreave, I.A.; Berggren, M. Lung protection by a thiol-containing antioxidant: N-acetylcysteine. Respiration 1986, 50 (Suppl. 1), 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Staal, F.J.; Ela, S.W.; Roederer, M.; Anderson, M.T.; Herzenberg, L.A. Glutathione deficiency and human immunodeficiency virus infection. Lancet 1992, 339, 909–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Medina, S.; Martínez, M.; Hernanz, A. Antioxidants inhibit the human cortical neuron apoptosis induced by hydrogen peroxide, tumor necrosis factor alpha, dopamine and beta-amyloid peptide 1–42. Free Radic. Res. 2002, 36, 1179–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Pocernich, C.B.; La Fontaine, M.; Butterfield, D.A. In-vivo glutathione elevation protects against hydroxyl free radical-induced protein oxidation in rat brain. Neurochem. Int. 2000, 36, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Martínez Banaclocha, M. N-acetylcysteine elicited increase in complex I activity in synaptic mitochondria from aged mice: Implications for treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Brain Res. 2000, 859, 173–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Martínez Banaclocha, M.; Martínez, N. N-acetylcysteine elicited increase in cytochrome c oxidase activity in mice synaptic mitochondria. Brain Res. 1999, 842, 249–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Clark, J.; Clore, E.L.; Zheng, K.; Adame, A.; Masliah, E.; Simon, D.K. Oral N-acetyl-cysteine attenuates loss of dopaminergic terminals in alpha-synuclein overexpressing mice. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e12333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Holdiness, M.R. Clinical pharmacokinetics of N-acetylcysteine. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 1991, 20, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Mahumane, G.D.; Kumar, P.; Pillay, V.; Choonara, Y.E. Repositioning. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Holmay, M.J.; Terpstra, M.; Coles, L.D.; Mishra, U.; Ahlskog, M.; Öz, G.; Cloyd, J.C.; Tuite, P.J. N-Acetylcysteine boosts brain and blood glutathione in Gaucher and Parkinson diseases. Clin. Neuropharmacol. 2013, 36, 103–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  129. Monti, D.A.; Zabrecky, G.; Kremens, D.; Liang, T.W.; Wintering, N.A.; Cai, J.; Wei, X.; Bazzan, A.J.; Zhong, L.; Bowen, B.; et al. N-Acetyl Cysteine May Support Dopamine Neurons in Parkinson’s Disease: Preliminary Clinical and Cell Line Data. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0157602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Coles, L.D.; Tuite, P.J.; Öz, G.; Mishra, U.R.; Kartha, R.V.; Sullivan, K.M.; Cloyd, J.C.; Terpstra, M. Repeated-Dose Oral N-Acetylcysteine in Parkinson’s Disease: Pharmacokinetics and Effect on Brain Glutathione and Oxidative Stress. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2018, 58, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Monti, D.A.; Zabrecky, G.; Kremens, D.; Liang, T.W.; Wintering, N.A.; Bazzan, A.J.; Zhong, L.; Bowens, B.K.; Chervoneva, I.; Intenzo, C.; et al. N-Acetyl Cysteine Is Associated With Dopaminergic Improvement in Parkinson’s Disease. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2019, 106, 884–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Katz, M.; Won, S.J.; Park, Y.; Orr, A.; Jones, D.P.; Swanson, R.A.; Glass, G.A. Cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of N-acetylcysteine after oral administration in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 2015, 21, 500–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Linster, C.L.; Van Schaftingen, E.; Vitamin, C. Biosynthesis, recycling and degradation in mammals. FEBS J. 2007, 274, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Njus, D.; Kelley, P.M.; Tu, Y.J.; Schlegel, H.B. Ascorbic acid: The chemistry underlying its antioxidant properties. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2020, 159, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Packer, J.E.; Slater, T.F.; Willson, R.L. Direct observation of a free radical interaction between vitamin E and vitamin C. Nature 1979, 278, 737–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Tsukaguchi, H.; Tokui, T.; Mackenzie, B.; Berger, U.V.; Chen, X.Z.; Wang, Y.; Brubaker, R.F.; Hediger, M.A. A family of mammalian Na+-dependent L-ascorbic acid transporters. Nature 1999, 399, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Frei, B.; Birlouez-Aragon, I.; Lykkesfeldt, J. Authors’ perspective: What is the optimum intake of vitamin C in humans? Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2012, 52, 815–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Hasselholt, S.; Tveden-Nyborg, P.; Lykkesfeldt, J. Distribution of vitamin C is tissue specific with early saturation of the brain and adrenal glands following differential oral dose regimens in guinea pigs. Br. J. Nutr. 2015, 113, 1539–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Figueroa-Méndez, R.; Rivas-Arancibia, S. Vitamin C in Health and Disease: Its Role in the Metabolism of Cells and Redox State in the Brain. Front. Physiol. 2015, 6, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  140. Stamford, J.A.; Kruk, Z.L.; Millar, J. Regional differences in extracellular ascorbic acid levels in the rat brain determined by high speed cyclic voltammetry. Brain Res. 1984, 299, 289–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Foy, C.J.; Passmore, A.P.; Vahidassr, M.D.; Young, I.S.; Lawson, J.T. Plasma chain-breaking antioxidants in Alzheimer’s disease, vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease. QJM 1999, 92, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  142. Yapa, S.C. Detection of subclinical ascorbate deficiency in early Parkinson’s disease. Public Health 1992, 106, 393–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Ide, K.; Yamada, H.; Umegaki, K.; Mizuno, K.; Kawakami, N.; Hagiwara, Y.; Matsumoto, M.; Yoshida, H.; Kim, K.; Shiosaki, E.; et al. Lymphocyte vitamin C levels as potential biomarker for progression of Parkinson’s disease. Nutrition 2015, 31, 406–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Pardo, B.; Mena, M.A.; Fahn, S.; García de Yébenes, J. Ascorbic acid protects against levodopa-induced neurotoxicity on a catecholamine-rich human neuroblastoma cell line. Mov. Disord. 1993, 8, 278–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Man Anh, H.; Linh, D.M.; My Dung, V.; Thi Phuong Thao, D. Evaluating Dose- and Time-Dependent Effects of Vitamin C Treatment on a Parkinson’s Disease Fly Model. Parkinsons Dis. 2019, 2019, 9720546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Bagga, V.; Dunnett, S.B.; Fricker-Gates, R.A. Ascorbic acid increases the number of dopamine neurons in vitro and in transplants to the 6-OHDA-lesioned rat brain. Cell Transplant. 2008, 17, 763–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Zhang, S.M.; Hernán, M.A.; Chen, H.; Spiegelman, D.; Willett, W.C.; Ascherio, A. Intakes of vitamins E and C, carotenoids, vitamin supplements, and PD risk. Neurology 2002, 59, 1161–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Hughes, K.C.; Gao, X.; Kim, I.Y.; Rimm, E.B.; Wang, M.; Weisskopf, M.G.; Schwarzschild, M.A.; Ascherio, A. Intake of antioxidant vitamins and risk of Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 2016, 31, 1909–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Fahn, S. A pilot trial of high-dose alpha-tocopherol and ascorbate in early Parkinson’s disease. Ann. Neurol. 1992, 32, S128–S132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Nagayama, H.; Hamamoto, M.; Ueda, M.; Nito, C.; Yamaguchi, H.; Katayama, Y. The effect of ascorbic acid on the pharmacokinetics of levodopa in elderly patients with Parkinson disease. Clin. Neuropharmacol. 2004, 27, 270–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Burton, G.W.; Joyce, A.; Ingold, K.U. First proof that vitamin E is major lipid-soluble, chain-breaking antioxidant in human blood plasma. Lancet 1982, 2, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Colombo, M.L. An update on vitamin E, tocopherol and tocotrienol-perspectives. Molecules 2010, 15, 2103–2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  153. Bruno, R.S.; Leonard, S.W.; Park, S.I.; Zhao, Y.; Traber, M.G. Human vitamin E requirements assessed with the use of apples fortified with deuterium-labeled alpha-tocopheryl acetate. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2006, 83, 299–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Borel, P.; Preveraud, D.; Desmarchelier, C. Bioavailability of vitamin E in humans: An update. Nutr. Rev. 2013, 71, 319–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Odunze, I.N.; Klaidman, L.K.; Adams, J.D. MPTP toxicity in the mouse brain and vitamin E. Neurosci. Lett. 1990, 108, 346–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Martinovits, G.; Melamed, E.; Cohen, O.; Rosenthal, J.; Uzzan, A. Systemic administration of antioxidants does not protect mice against the dopaminergic neurotoxicity of 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP). Neurosci. Lett. 1986, 69, 192–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Gong, L.; Daigneault, E.A.; Acuff, R.V.; Kostrzewa, R.M. Vitamin E supplements fail to protect mice from acute MPTP neurotoxicity. Neuroreport 1991, 2, 544–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Barc, S.; Page, G.; Barrier, L.; Huguet, F.; Fauconneau, B. Progressive alteration of neuronal dopamine transporter activity in a rat injured by an intranigral injection of MPP+. Brain Res. 2002, 941, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Group, P.S. Effects of tocopherol and deprenyl on the progression of disability in early Parkinson’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 1993, 328, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Marras, C.; Lang, A.E.; Eberly, S.W.; Oakes, D.; Fahn, S.; Schwid, S.R.; Hyson, C.; Shoulson, I. A comparison of treatment thresholds in two large Parkinson’s disease clinical trial cohorts. Mov. Disord. 2009, 24, 2370–2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Joutsa, J.; Gardberg, M.; Röyttä, M.; Kaasinen, V. Diagnostic accuracy of parkinsonism syndromes by general neurologists. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 2014, 20, 840–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Jankovic, J. Parkinson’s disease: Clinical features and diagnosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2008, 79, 368–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  163. Wu, Y.; Yao, Q.; Jiang, G.X.; Wang, G.; Cheng, Q. Identification of distinct blood-based biomarkers in early stage of Parkinson’s disease. Neurol. Sci. 2020, 41, 893–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Jin, H.; Kanthasamy, A.; Ghosh, A.; Anantharam, V.; Kalyanaraman, B.; Kanthasamy, A.G. Mitochondria-targeted antioxidants for treatment of Parkinson’s disease: Preclinical and clinical outcomes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1842, 1282–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  165. Khalil, I.; Yehye, W.A.; Etxeberria, A.E.; Alhadi, A.A.; Dezfooli, S.M.; Julkapli, N.B.M.; Basirun, W.J.; Seyfoddin, A. Nanoantioxidants: Recent Trends in Antioxidant Delivery Applications. Antioxidants 2019, 9, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  166. Mohd Zaffarin, A.S.; Ng, S.F.; Ng, M.H.; Hassan, H.; Alias, E. Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics of Vitamin E: Nanoformulations to Enhance Bioavailability. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020, 15, 9961–9974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Antioxidants 10 00453 g001 550
Figure 1. ROS and RNS generation. (A) The mitochondria are the main source of free radicals within the cell. The electron leakage in the electron transport chain (ETC) generates superoxide anion (O2•−) in the mitochondrial matrix, where it is scavenged by MnSOD producing H2O2 that, in turn, is detoxified by catalase, Prx, and GPx. (B) Another source of O2•− is the NOX enzyme family, which uses NADPH to reduce molecular oxygen to produce O2•−. The O2•− cannot cross membranes, but H2O2 easily diffuses through them. (C) If H2O2 concentration overcomes the enzymatic antioxidants activity, it reacts with transition metal ions such as iron, mediating the OH• formation by the Fenton’s reaction. (D) Nitric oxide synthases (NOS) catalyze the L-arginine oxidation producing L-citrulline and NO•. The latter can diffuse through membranes and react with mitochondrial O2•− producing peroxynitrite (ONOO−), which diffuses to different cellular compartments causing RNS-mediated damage (figure created in BioRender.com accessed on 29 January 2021).
Figure 1. ROS and RNS generation. (A) The mitochondria are the main source of free radicals within the cell. The electron leakage in the electron transport chain (ETC) generates superoxide anion (O2•−) in the mitochondrial matrix, where it is scavenged by MnSOD producing H2O2 that, in turn, is detoxified by catalase, Prx, and GPx. (B) Another source of O2•− is the NOX enzyme family, which uses NADPH to reduce molecular oxygen to produce O2•−. The O2•− cannot cross membranes, but H2O2 easily diffuses through them. (C) If H2O2 concentration overcomes the enzymatic antioxidants activity, it reacts with transition metal ions such as iron, mediating the OH• formation by the Fenton’s reaction. (D) Nitric oxide synthases (NOS) catalyze the L-arginine oxidation producing L-citrulline and NO•. The latter can diffuse through membranes and react with mitochondrial O2•− producing peroxynitrite (ONOO−), which diffuses to different cellular compartments causing RNS-mediated damage (figure created in BioRender.com accessed on 29 January 2021).
Antioxidants 10 00453 g001
Antioxidants 10 00453 g002 550
Figure 2. Molecular structures of non-enzymatic antioxidants.
Figure 2. Molecular structures of non-enzymatic antioxidants.
Antioxidants 10 00453 g002
Antioxidants 10 00453 g003 550
Figure 3. Subcellular non-enzymatic antioxidants targets. Within the cell, non-enzymatic antioxidants are distributed according to their subcellular target. The mitochondria are protected from oxidative stress by CoQ10, MitoQ, carnosine, and Vit C. In the cytoplasm, the antioxidant system includes GSH, NAC, and UA. Vit E is found in cytoplasmic, ERR, and mitochondrial membranes, as well as in lysosomes.
Figure 3. Subcellular non-enzymatic antioxidants targets. Within the cell, non-enzymatic antioxidants are distributed according to their subcellular target. The mitochondria are protected from oxidative stress by CoQ10, MitoQ, carnosine, and Vit C. In the cytoplasm, the antioxidant system includes GSH, NAC, and UA. Vit E is found in cytoplasmic, ERR, and mitochondrial membranes, as well as in lysosomes.
Antioxidants 10 00453 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Duarte-Jurado, A.P.; Gopar-Cuevas, Y.; Saucedo-Cardenas, O.; Loera-Arias, M.d.J.; Montes-de-Oca-Luna, R.; Garcia-Garcia, A.; Rodriguez-Rocha, H. Antioxidant Therapeutics in Parkinson’s Disease: Current Challenges and Opportunities. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 453. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10030453

AMA Style

Duarte-Jurado AP, Gopar-Cuevas Y, Saucedo-Cardenas O, Loera-Arias MdJ, Montes-de-Oca-Luna R, Garcia-Garcia A, Rodriguez-Rocha H. Antioxidant Therapeutics in Parkinson’s Disease: Current Challenges and Opportunities. Antioxidants. 2021; 10(3):453. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10030453

Chicago/Turabian Style

Duarte-Jurado, Ana Patricia, Yareth Gopar-Cuevas, Odila Saucedo-Cardenas, Maria de Jesus Loera-Arias, Roberto Montes-de-Oca-Luna, Aracely Garcia-Garcia, and Humberto Rodriguez-Rocha. 2021. "Antioxidant Therapeutics in Parkinson’s Disease: Current Challenges and Opportunities" Antioxidants 10, no. 3: 453. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10030453

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop