Next Article in Journal
Estimating the Probability of Vegetation to Be Groundwater Dependent Based on the Evaluation of Tree Models
Previous Article in Journal
Mercury Accumulation, and the Mercury-PCB-Sex Interaction, in Lake Whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis)
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Environments 2016, 3(1), 8; doi:10.3390/environments3010008

Consumer Perception of Environmental Harm and Willingness to Pay Environmental Handling Fees

Department of Geography, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, N2L3C5, Canada
Academic Editor: Theodore R. Alter
Received: 29 January 2016 / Revised: 7 March 2016 / Accepted: 10 March 2016 / Published: 18 March 2016
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1526 KB, uploaded 18 March 2016]   |  

Abstract

This study undertook a critical examination of the relationship between perception of environmental harm and consumer willingness to pay for environmental handling fees (EHF). This analysis was supplemented by asking study participants to indicate under what circumstances (and for what materials) they believe a visible fee is appropriate. This study found that there is a statistically significant correlation between willingness to pay environmental handling fees and the perceived environmental harm of the product on which the fee is applied. For items that respondents viewed as “innocuous to the environment” (i.e., “keyboards and mice”), they were relatively unwilling to pay an environmental handling fee. Conversely, for the full range of hazardous waste materials, consumers expressed a willingness to pay EHFs. With respect to fee visibility, respondents indicated that they preferred visible fees (at the sticker) for products that they perceived to be dangerous. There is a strong correlation between perceived environmental harm and whether fees should be visible. Consumers are not necessarily averse to paying an eco fee on products (be they hazardous waste, electronic waste, etc.), but their willingness to do so is almost entirely a function of whether they believe the product is environmentally burdensome. It is the recommendation of this study that promotion and education campaigns for environmental handling fees, particularly those surrounding waste electronics, place greater emphasis on environmental consequences of improper disposal. View Full-Text
Keywords: recycling; extended producer responsibility; environmental harm; eco-fees; diversion; Ontario recycling; extended producer responsibility; environmental harm; eco-fees; diversion; Ontario
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Lakhan, C. Consumer Perception of Environmental Harm and Willingness to Pay Environmental Handling Fees. Environments 2016, 3, 8.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Environments EISSN 2076-3298 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top