Next Article in Journal
Retrospective Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the Beef Sector in Greece and Potential Mitigation Scenarios
Previous Article in Journal
Maceration of Waste Cork in Binary Hydrophilic Solvents for the Production of Functional Extracts
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Environments
Volume 10
Issue 8
10.3390/environments10080143
environments-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Prediction of Cyanotoxin Episodes in Freshwater: A Case Study on Microcystin and Saxitoxin in the Lobo Reservoir, São Paulo State, Brazil

by
Munique de Almeida Bispo Moraes
1,
Raphaella de Abreu Magalhães Rodrigues
1,
Raju Podduturi
2,
Niels Ole Gerslev Jørgensen
2,* and
Maria do Carmo Calijuri
1
1
Department of Hydraulics and Sanitation, São Carlos School of Engineering, University of São Paulo, 400 Trabalhador São Carlense Avenue, São Carlos 13566-590, Brazil
2
Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, 1871 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Environments 2023, 10(8), 143; https://doi.org/10.3390/environments10080143
Submission received: 20 July 2023 / Revised: 9 August 2023 / Accepted: 10 August 2023 / Published: 13 August 2023
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Freshwater reservoirs constitute an important source of drinking water, but eutrophication and higher temperatures increase the risk of more frequent blooms of cyanobacteria, including species that produce toxins. To improve the prediction of cyanotoxin episodes, we studied the annual occurrence of potential microcystin (MC) and saxitoxin (STX)-producing cyanobacteria in the Lobo reservoir, São Paulo State, Brazil. Relationships among environmental variables, cyanobacterial biomass, numbers of the mcyE and sxtA genotypes (genes encoding production of MC and STX, respectively), and concentrations of MC and STX were determined to address variables applicable for monitoring and predicting the dynamics of cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins in the reservoir. Microscopy confirmed the presence of potentially toxin-producing cyanobacteria at all sampling times, and qPCR detection showed the occurrence of both mcyE and sxtA in most samples. Concentrations of MC and STX were generally low (MC 0–1.54 µg L−1; STX 0.03–0.21 µg L−1). The highest MC level exceeded the recommended limit for human intake of 1 µg L−1. The abundance of the mcyE and sxtA genes, as well as the toxin concentrations, were positively correlated with the biomass of Phormidium and Raphidiopsis. Among environmental variables, the abundance of potential toxic cyanobacteria was mainly affected by P limitation (high TN:TP ratios). Our data show that detection of the mcyE and sxtA genotypes serves as a useful and reliable predictor of toxin episodes but might be combined with chemical toxin detection to form an environmental toolbox for cyanotoxin monitoring.

1. Introduction

Globally, eutrophication and climate change have caused an increased occurrence of cyanobacteria in many freshwaters [1]. Several species of cyanobacteria produce toxins that cause threats to water quality and pose risks to human and animal health [1,2]. To minimize these negative effects, monitoring and adequate management of cyanobacterial abundance are essential measures, particularly in freshwater systems used as sources of drinking water and for recreation. In natural environments, the conditions that promote the development of cyanobacterial blooms and induce toxin production are usually an interaction of a variety of factors [3], such as nutrient inputs [4,5], temperature [6,7], light intensities [8,9], pH [10,11], and hydrodynamics (i.e., water level, wind-driven currents, and stratification) [12,13]. For example, higher nutrient levels and higher temperatures may interact simultaneously with cyanobacterial growth and cyanotoxin production [14]. In this context, some studies suggest that climate change can intensify the effects of eutrophication in aquatic environments [15,16]. Therefore, the identification of major environmental drivers and their consequences on the dominance of cyanobacteria and cyanotoxin production is important when deciding which management strategies should be applied, aiming to reduce the impacts of eutrophication and higher temperatures [1].
Among the toxins produced by cyanobacteria, microcystin (hepatotoxin) and saxitoxin (neurotoxin) are the most commonly reported worldwide [17]. Microcystin (MC) and saxitoxin (STX) are synthesized by gene clusters known as mcy and sxt, respectively [18,19,20,21]. Molecular characterization of the two gene clusters has enabled the application of selected mcy and sxt genes as targets for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and later also for quantitative PCR (qPCR). Various mcy and sxt genes have been targeted by qPCR to quantify the abundance of specific MC and STX producers in natural environments [22]. For example, Al-Tebrineh et al. [23,24] developed a specific quantitative PCR method based on the sxtA gene to quantify saxitoxin-producing Anabaena circinalis among cyanobacteria in several Australian water bodies. In another study, the mcyE gene was targeted to quantify potential MC producers in Missisquoi Bay (QC, Canada), which is an area that supports important economic and recreational activities and serves as water intake for the drinking water treatment plant of surrounding towns [25]. Thus, the abundance of potentially toxic cyanobacteria in natural environments can be quantified by the amplification of genetic markers by qPCR, allowing differentiation between toxic and non-toxic but morphologically similar strains, e.g., within a species [22].
Lobo is a subtropical reservoir located in São Paulo State, Brazil. The main uses of water in the reservoir are the generation of hydroelectric energy, the supply of drinking water, the irrigation of plantations, and recreation, which contribute to the social and economic development of the surrounding area [26]. One episode of a major cyanobacterial bloom and an accompanying production of cyanotoxins occurred in July 2014 in the reservoir [27] and was caused by Raphidiopsis raciborskii (basionym Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii) [28]. During the bloom, the toxins saxitoxin and microcystin were detected in the reservoir. Reoccurring episodes of undesirable cyanotoxin concentrations may be expected since the reservoir is experiencing water quality deterioration due to the release of high loads of nutrients into the system [27,29].
Cyanobacterial genera with potential for the production of cyanotoxins have previously been identified in the phytoplankton community in Lobo reservoir [27,29,30], but molecular techniques for detection and quantification of microcystin- and saxitoxin-producing cyanobacteria in the reservoir have not been applied. Therefore, we examined the cyanobacterial community in the Lobo reservoir between May 2017 and January 2018 for the abundance of the mcyE and sxtA genes and quantified the MC and STX concentrations in the water. Aiming to assess the variables that might be applicable for monitoring the dynamics of potentially toxin-producing cyanobacteria in the reservoir, we examined correlations between environmental variables and cyanobacterial biomass, mcyE and sxtA genotypes, and concentrations of MC and STX.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Study Sites and Sampling

Water samples were collected in the Lobo reservoir, located in São Paulo State, Brazil (Figure 1). The main characteristics of the reservoir and sampling sites are shown in Table S1. Samplings were carried out at riverine and dam zones in May, August, October 2017, and January 2018 at two depths (100% = surface; 1% = lower limit of the euphotic zone) determined by the photosynthetically active radiation (PAR, µmol photons m−2 s−1, Table S2) using a light sensor (LI-1400 DataLogger, sensitivity of 400–700 nm, LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA) (n = 16).

2.2. Physicochemical Variables

The profiles of pH, dissolved oxygen (DO, mg L−1), electrical conductivity (EC, µS cm−1), turbidity (NTU), and water temperature (°C) were determined on-site using a HANNA probe (HANNA HI9829, Limena, Italy). Water transparency (m) was determined using a Secchi disk, and the lower limit of the euphotic zone (Zeu, m) was determined as 1% of PAR. Water samples were filtered through 0.7 µm-pore-size glass fiber filters (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Whatman, MA, USA). Chlorophyll a (chl a) in the material on the filters was extracted with ethanol 80% (v/v) and the extracts were analyzed as described by Nusch [31]. The filtrates were kept frozen at −20 °C until analysis of dissolved nutrients (soluble reactive phosphorus—SRP, nitrate—NO3−-N, nitrite—NO2-N, and ammonium—NH4+-N). For unfiltered water, we quantified total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) and total phosphorus (TP). Total nitrogen (TN) concentrations were estimated as the sum of TKN, NO2−-N, and NO3−-N. TN:TP molar ratios were also calculated. The nutrient analyses were carried out using spectrophotometric methods in triplicate (APHA) [32]. The trophic state index (TSI) of the sampling sites (riverine and dam zones) was calculated considering the annual geometric means of chl a and TP [33].

2.3. Microscopic Identification and Enumeration

For phytoplankton analysis, untreated water samples were Lugol-fixed for subsequent identification and quantification in sedimentation chambers using an inverted microscope (Olympus CK2) at 400× magnification following the Utermöhl (1958) [34] method. Phytoplankton taxa were identified according to specialized literature [35,36,37,38,39,40]. A counting limit was established through the species–rarefying curve until reaching 100 individuals (cell, filament, colony, and coenobium) of the most common species. Twenty organisms of each taxon with a relative abundance > 10% were measured to estimate the mean cell volume based on the geometric models [41,42]. For taxa with a relative abundance < 10%, mean cell volumes were obtained from specialized literature. Cell densities were converted to biovolume (mm3 L−1) by multiplying cell densities by the average taxa-specific cell volume. Phytoplankton biomass was estimated according to Wetzel and Likens [43], where 1 mm3 L−1 = 1 mg L−1.

2.4. DNA Extraction and Quantitative Real-Time PCR

For the DNA extraction, water samples (volume of 500 mL) were immediately filtered through 0.22 µm-pore-size mixed cellulose ester membranes (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Whatman, MA, USA), and the filters were kept frozen at −20 °C until processing. Total genomic DNA was extracted from the filters using the DNeasy PowerWater Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA concentrations were quantified using a NanoDrop 2000c spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, NC, USA) [44]. The DNA purity was determined by the ratio of absorbance at 260 nm to absorbance at 280 nm. Further, the DNA quality was visualized on a 1% agarose gel stained with GelRedTM Nucleic Acid Gel Stain (Biotium Inc., Fremont, CA, USA) using a Bio-Rad Gel Doc™ 2000 gel documentation system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA).
Quantification of the mcyE gene was carried out using the CyanoDTec Toxin Gene Kit (Phytoxigene Inc., Akron, OH, USA). This kit is based upon molecular (DNA) technology (quantitative real-time PCR), which includes standards for the toxin gene target and validated primers and probes for the quantification of the toxin-producing genes in aquatic environments. A standard of known toxin gene copy was assayed in serial dilutions spanning four orders of magnitude (from 1 × 105 to 1 × 102 copies per reaction volume) to generate a standard curve for the MC target gene mcyE with an amplification efficiency of 96% (R2 = 0.99; slope = −3.43). The analysis was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions using an AriaMx Real-Time PCR System (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) in a total volume of 20 µL per reaction. Each sample was run in duplicate. PCR was initiated with preheating at 95 °C for 2 min, followed by 40 PCR cycles, each consisting of 15 s at 95 °C and 45 s at 60 °C. Fluorescence measurement of the generated products was obtained at the end of each cycle at 60 °C. Gene copies in each reaction were calculated using the AriaMx Software version (1.3) (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and back-calculated to copies mL−1.
A qPCR assay for the sxtA gene using SYBR® Green was adopted for use in this study [45]. The qPCR assay was performed using the primer set sxtA-cyano-F (5′-TTATGAAGCGTGCTGTCTGG-3′) and sxtA-cyano-R (5′-TCTGCCGACATGGAATACAC-3′). The qPCR product was a 153 bp fragment. The qPCR reactions were run in triplicate in an AriaMx Real-Time PCR System (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The final volume for each qPCR reaction was 20 µL, containing 2 µL of template DNA from a standard or environmental sample, 0.4 µL of the sxtA-cyano-F and sxtA-cyano-R primers (10 pmol µL−1), 10 µL of Brilliant III Ultra-Fast SYBR® Green qPCR Master Mix (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), and 7.2 µL of nuclease-free water (Sigma-Aldrich, San Luis, MO, USA). The qPCR assays were performed under the following cycling conditions: preheating at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles, each consisting of 30 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 65 °C, 30 s at 72 °C and 10 s at 77.5 °C, and a melt cycle of 30 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 65 °C, and 30 s at 95 °C. Fluorescence measurement of the generated products was obtained at the end of each cycle at 77.5 °C. Data analysis was performed by the AriaMx Software version (1.3) (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

2.5. Cyanotoxin Analyses

Cyanotoxins were extracted from 50 mL unfiltered water samples by triplicate freeze-thaw cycles, including freezing at −80 °C for a minimum of 1 h and sonication at 37 °C for 5–10 min to lyse the cyanobacteria cells. Total saxitoxin (STX) and total microcystin (MC) concentrations were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using commercial kits (Beacon Analytical Systems Inc., Saco, ME, USA) using procedures provided by the manufacturer.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The obtained data were tested for normality using the Shapiro–Wilk test. A Mann–Whitney test was carried out to evaluate the differences between sites (riverine and dam zones) and depths (100% and 1% of PAR) considering the environmental variables and the biomass of cyanobacteria. To evaluate the differences between months, a Kruskal–Wallis test was conducted considering the environmental variables and the biomass of cyanobacteria, and a Dunn’s post hoc multiple comparison test was performed if significant differences were observed in the Kruskal–Wallis test (p < 0.05). A principal components analysis (PCA) with a correlation matrix was performed to summarize the environmental variability of the reservoir according to abiotic conditions registered during the studied period, characterizing the sampling sites, months, and depths, and identifying the variables that best differentiate them (strong correlations were those with r ≥ 0.5 with the ordination axes 1 or 2). The relationships between cyanotoxins genes, cyanotoxins production, cyanobacteria biomass, and environmental variables were assessed by Spearman’s rank-order correlations (p < 0.05). To obtain the significant factors that explained the occurrence of microcystin and saxitoxin in the reservoir, a simple linear regression analysis was conducted. Environmental variables were log(x + 1) transformed before analysis to meet the conditions of normality and homogeneity of variance in the residuals. Data were analyzed using STATISTICA version (13.5) (TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) and PAST version (4.06) [46].

3. Results

3.1. Environmental Variables

Among environmental variables, significant seasonal changes were found for pH, electrical conductivity (EC), dissolved oxygen (DO), and water temperature (months; p < 0.05). As for spatial changes (riverine vs. dam zones), EC, turbidity, total phosphorus (TP), total nitrogen (TN), nitrate, and nitrite showed significant variations (p < 0.05). None of the environmental variables differed between depths (p > 0.05). Mean values, ranges, and statistical results are presented in Table S3.
The difference in environmental variables between the riverine and dam zones in the reservoir suggests an effect of the discharge of untreated wastewater in the riverine zone. In the riverine zone, mean values of EC (20.38 µS cm−1), water turbidity (6.06 NTU), TP (25.92 µg L−1), and soluble reactive P (2.36 µg L−1), as well as TN (0.80 mg L−1), were higher than in the dam zone. The high TN:TP ratio in both zones (64 in the riverine zone and 87 in the dam zone) indicates a general limitation by P in the reservoir. Concentrations of chl a (range 3.95 to 27.3 µg L−1 in the reservoir) were occasionally higher in the dam zone, but no differences between the two zones were found during the studied period (p > 0.05). The trophic state index indicates that both zones can be characterized as mesotrophic.

3.2. Phytoplankton Community

Cyanobacteria were commonly occurring in the Lobo reservoir, but they did not make up the dominant phytoplankton group (Figure 2a). Dinoflagellates and cryptophytes were the most abundant groups of phytoplankton, followed by diatoms and green algae (Figure 2b). The highest biomass of cyanobacteria was observed in May 2017 in the dam zone (0.24 mg L−1), corresponding to 12% of the total phytoplankton biomass. At the other sampling times, cyanobacteria made up less than 7% of the biomass (Figure 2b). Phytoplankton taxa identified in the reservoir by microscopy are listed in Table S4.
Fourteen species of cyanobacteria belonging to 10 genera were identified. Although in low proportion, potential microcystin (MC) and saxitoxin (STX)-producing organisms were detected in all samples by microscopic analysis (Figure 3), including Aphanocapsa spp., Chroococcus spp., Microcystis protocystis, Pseudanabaena spp., and Synechocystis aquatilis (all known as MC producers), Aphanizomenon gracile, Geitlerinema amphibium, Raphidiopsis raciborskii (known as STX producers), and Phormidium sp. (known as MC and STX producers) [47,48,49,50,51].
The occurrence of the cyanobacteria showed seasonal changes in some genera, but none of the cyanobacteria had significant vertical (surface vs. depth) or horizontal (riverine vs. dam) variations of their biomasses (p > 0.05). Cyanobacteria with a permanent occurrence included Aphanocapsa spp. and S. aquatilis, as well as Chroococcus spp. and R. raciborskii, but Chroococcus spp. and R. raciborskii both had a rather variable occurrence. The highest biomass of R. raciborskii was observed in May and October 2017 in the dam zone. Among cyanobacteria with a seasonal variation in biomass were Anathece sp. (maximum biomass in October 2017 and January 2018) and Aphanocapsa spp. and Pseudanabaena spp. (highest biomasses in May 2017; p < 0.05). Microcystis protocystis was observed only in May and August 2017 in the dam zone. Phormidium sp. occurred only in May 2017 in both zones, while A. gracile was detected in August and October 2017 in the riverine zone and in May 2017 in the dam zone. G. amphibium was observed in May 2017 in both zones and in January 2018 in the dam zone (Figure 3, Table S4).

3.3. Abundance of mcyE and sxtA Genes and Toxin Concentrations

The qPCR assay confirmed the presence of mcyE genotypes in the Lobo reservoir in May 2017 (riverine and dam zones) and in August 2017 (dam zone only). The number of the mcyE gene ranged from undetectable to 4.25 × 103 copies mL−1 and total MC concentrations ranged from undetectable to 1.54 µg L−1 (Figure 4) and correlated positively with the mcyE gene (rho = 0.75, p < 0.001) (Table 1). Microcystin concentrations in the Lobo reservoir were positively correlated with the biomass of Phormidium sp. (rho = 0.66, p = 0.005). Although no correlations between concentrations of MC and biomass of the potential MC producers Aphanocapsa spp., Chroococcus spp., M. protocystis, Pseudanabaena spp., and S. aquatilis were observed, the possibility that these cyanobacteria were also producing MC in the Lobo reservoir should not be ruled out since they were present in the reservoir when MC was detected.
The sxtA gene was detected by qPCR in all samples but showed a temporal variation in abundance (p = 0.017). The number of copies of the sxtA gene in the reservoir during the studied period ranged from 8.79 × 101 to 2.34 × 104 copies mL−1. The highest and lowest numbers were measured in May 2017 in the dam zone and in January 2018 in the riverine zone, respectively (Figure 5). Saxitoxin (STX) concentrations varied significantly between months (p = 0.022). When STX was detected in the water, the concentrations varied between 0.03 and 0.21 µg L−1 (Figure 5) and correlated positively with the sxtA gene abundance (rho = 0.74, p < 0.001) (Table 1). The presence of STX correlated positively with the biomasses of Phormidium sp. (rho = 0.64, p = 0.008) and R. raciborskii (rho = 0.58, p = 0.02). No correlations were observed between concentrations of STX and biomasses of A. gracile and G. amphibium, but it cannot be excluded that these potential STX producers were also responsible for the saxitoxin production in the reservoir.

3.4. Relationship between Environmental Variables, Cyanobacteria and Cyanotoxins

A principal component analysis (PCA) showed that the 19 initial environmental variables could be reduced to only 9 variables that accounted for 72.81% of the total variance of the two first components (PC 1 = 53.80% and PC 2 = 19.01%) (Figure 6). The main variables that positively correlated to the PC 1 axis were MC (r = 0.98), mcyE gene (r = 0.89), saxitoxin (r = 0.80), sxtA gene (r = 0.97), and chl a (r = 0.89). For the PC 2 axis, electrical conductivity (EC; r = 0.63), TP (r = 0.69), and soluble reactive P (r = 0.86) showed positive correlations. Riverine samples from October and January appear to be similar for high nutrient concentrations (TP and nitrite) and EC. In May 2017, the riverine and dam zones were characterized by high levels of STX, sxtA, MC, mcyE, and chl a.
The correlation analyses in Table 1 indicated that different variables influenced the abundance of the mcyE and sxtA genotypes as well as concentrations of MC and STX. MC concentrations and mcyE gene numbers were positively correlated with chl a but negatively correlated with nitrite. The mcyE gene number was negatively correlated with EC and TP. STX concentrations and sxtA gene numbers were positively correlated with cyanobacterial biomass. STX concentrations were also positively correlated with soluble reactive P, while the sxtA gene was negatively correlated with nitrite.
A linear regression analysis suggested an acceptable estimate of the MC concentration by both chl a (R2 = 0.80, p < 0.001) and mcyE gene number (R2 = 0.86, p < 0.001). Regarding STX, the best predictor was the sxtA gene number (R2 = 0.68, p < 0.001). Despite the moderate correlation observed between cyanobacterial biomass and STX, regression analysis indicated that cyanobacterial biomass was not a good fit for the prediction of STX (Table 2).

4. Discussion

4.1. Cyanobacteria and Cyanotoxins in the Reservoir

The water quality in the Lobo reservoir has been characterized as “compromised” due to the discharge of nutrients from agriculture, livestock, residential areas, and various diffuse sources [29]. The effects of this eutrophication were studied in July 2014, when a cyanobacterial bloom dominated by Raphidiopsis raciborskii was observed in the reservoir [27]. During the bloom, MC and STX were detected in the water, but no concentrations were reported [27]. The authors emphasized the need for future monitoring of cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins due to the continuous discharge of phosphorus and nitrogen. In the present study, both the riverine and the dam sampling sites were classified as mesotrophic (TP < 37.85 µg L−1 and chl a < 27.30 µg L−1), and the average TN:TP ratios (64:1 in the riverine zone and 87:1 in the dam zone) indicate a limitation by phosphorus at both sites. During our study, the phytoplankton community was mainly characterized by the presence of dinoflagellates, diatoms, cryptophytes, and chlorophytes. Cyanobacteria occurred at all sampling times, but at a low biomass. However, among the ten cyanobacterial genera observed in the reservoir, nine are known as potentially cyanotoxin-producing organisms.
Variations in concentrations of MC and STX in the lower stratum of the euphotic zone and at the surface of the reservoir did not show clear trends. Possibly, wind action and the shallow depth at the sampling sites (max. 2.5 m and 11.5 m depths in the riverine and dam zones, respectively) (Table S1) resulted in the mixing of the water column. Statistical analyses indicated that MC production could be related to the genus Phormidium and that STX production could be associated with the genera Phormidium and Raphidiopsis in the reservoir. However, since other potential toxin-producing genera of cyanobacteria also occurred in the water (Figure 3, Table S4), it cannot be confirmed that these genera actually produced toxins in the reservoir.
Although the cyanobacterial biomass was low and no bloom episodes occurred in the reservoir during the studied period, this does not exclude the production and release of cyanotoxins in the water. In a study on microcystin in Lake Vancouver, where the abundance of Microcystis sp. rarely exceeded one percent of the cyanobacteria, Lee et al. [4] observed that the majority of the Microcystis population contained the mcyE gene, and concentrations of MC above the WHO guidelines for drinking water were repeatedly measured. In our study, concentrations of MC exceeded the allowed limit of 1.0 µg L−1 for human consumption (Brazilian Ministry of Health; Ordinance 2914/2011) [52] in May 2017 in the dam zone. STX was detected in half of the Lobo water samples, but the concentrations were below the level indicated for drinking water (3.00 μg L−1), as also reported for the reservoir by Tundisi et al. [27].
According to current Brazilian legislation [52], concentrations of MC and STX should be quantified weekly, but only if the cyanobacterial density exceeds 20,000 cells mL−1. However, the density of cyanobacteria should not be the only parameter for verifying the potential for cyanotoxin production, since the abundance of cyanobacteria does not identify the toxic potential of a cyanobacterial community, as our results indicate. Further, microscopic analyses are time-consuming and therefore microscopic counts may not be immediately available during bloom episodes. According to our results, the abundance of the mcyE and sxtA genes correlated significantly with concentrations of MC and STX, respectively, and mcyE and MC also correlated with chl a concentrations. Therefore, to improve fast monitoring for toxin production and to better assess the actual situation of a water body with respect to the occurrence of cyanotoxins, we suggest the application of quantitative molecular methods targeting toxin-encoding genes, such as the qPCR procedure. By combining this approach with quantification of chl a concentration, this would allow faster estimates of potential toxin episodes than time-consuming microscopy. If possible, it is also important to determine the toxin concentration using analytical methods to verify the actual toxicity of the water.

4.2. Environmental Variables and Cyanotoxins

In the Lobo reservoir, our results showed that concentrations of MC and numbers of the mcyE and sxtA genes were negatively correlated with nitrite concentrations. Concentrations of STX correlated positively with soluble reactive P, while the sxtA gene abundance was negatively related to total P. Previous studies demonstrated that concentrations of N and P are significant parameters affecting microcystin and saxitoxin production, as well as the abundance of toxic genotypes [4,5,53]. However, the importance of each of these parameters appears to vary strongly between different environments. Nutrient control of MC production was demonstrated in laboratory experiments by Pimentel and Giani [48], who observed that deprivation of N and P promoted the mcyD gene transcription, possibly due to oxidative stress during the nutrient limitation. Supporting this, an increased transcription of the mcy gene was also measured during nitrate starvation by Ginn et al. [54]. For STX, Cirés et al. [7] measured an increased production by Aphanizomenon gracile when dissolved inorganic N was depleted. Similar results on the influence of N on the production of STX have been reported in other studies [55,56].
In the Lobo reservoir, the low availability of soluble reactive P (< 3.70 µg L−1) may have affected the positive correlation between this source of P and concentrations of STX. Vargas et al. [5] observed that low levels of P (≤ 3.30 µg L−1) stimulated the production of STX by R. raciborskii, and this might indicate a survival strategy and adaptation to P-limited environments. Considering that the soluble reactive P level in our study was similar to that used by Vargas et al. [5], we tend to conclude that the low availability of P in the Lobo reservoir may have affected STX production by cyanobacteria. Furthermore, although R. raciborskii can dominate at both low and high TN:TP ratios, the production of saxitoxin is enhanced at high TN:TP ratios (> 40:1) [57]. In the Lobo reservoir, the TN:TP ratios varied between 30:1 (riverine zone) and 124:1 (dam zone), which may explain the occurrence of STX despite the low cyanobacterial biomass observed in the reservoir.
The abundance of the mcyE gene was significantly and negatively related to electrical conductivity (EC) in the reservoir. Tao et al. [58] examined key factors affecting the cell-specific content of MC in Microcystis sp. in Lake Taihu (China), and they concluded that EC explained 21% of the variation in MC content and was the highest weighted parameter in the applied model. Since the EC parameter reflects the ability of water to conduct electricity, including the concentration of inorganic ions, e.g., nutrients, the authors explained that low values of EC can be an indication of suboptimal conditions for growth (due to fewer nutrients), which may promote MC production as a response to the nutrient limitation.

4.3. Monitoring of Toxic Cyanobacteria

Although concentrations of MC and STX covaried with the abundance of the respective functional genes, mcyE and sxtA, an unexpected observation was found in January 2018 when MC was measured in the water, while no copies of mcyE were detected. Considering that microcystins can remain in the water for several weeks [59,60], this discrepancy was probably caused by the persistence of MC in the reservoir, even after the disappearance of the MC-producing cyanobacteria, as also reported by Nimptsch et al. [61]. Regarding STX, the detection of the sxtA gene in all samples indicated the presence of potentially saxitoxin-producing cyanobacteria during the entire studied period, yet no STX was measured in half of the water samples. This might be due to either down-regulation of the sxt gene expression [62] or that the sxtA-carrying cells detected by qPCR did not produce sufficient saxitoxin to be measured by the ELISA method (detection limit of 0.02 µg L−1).
The direct relationship between cyanotoxin concentrations and gene copy numbers found in most cases in the reservoir agrees with reports from other studies [4,23,24,25]. However, in other cases, no correlations were found in natural waters [63,64,65]. This inconsistency may be attributed to several methodological variations, e.g., DNA extraction methods, target genes and primers for qPCR, and the method applied for cyanotoxin quantification, e.g., ELISA, HPLC, and LC-MS/MS, but also whether intra-or extracellular fractions are measured, as reported by Guedes et al. [64] and Pacheco et al. [22]. These authors raised concern regarding the estimation of cyanotoxin concentration in environmental samples from the quantification of toxic positive genotypes since the factors stated above can contribute to discrepancies.
The present finding of a positive correlation between concentrations of chl a and MC concentrations and mcyE gene copy numbers agrees with observations from other studies, suggesting that monitoring of chl a could serve as a first warning sign for the presence of microcystin in water bodies [3,15,66]. Cunha et al. [67] used a 5-year time series of MC concentrations in six subtropical reservoirs to investigate the main factors related to MC concentrations and estimate thresholds for predicting toxin production. The authors found that for MC ≥ 0.10 μg L−1, the chl a threshold was 13.00 μg L−1, while the threshold for MC ≥ 1.00 μg L−1 was 39.80 μg chl a L−1. In the Lobo reservoir, the maximum MC concentration (1.54 μg L−1) occurred when chl a was below 28.00 μg L−1. Since the study of Cunha et al. [67] included a larger set of samples, and considering the limitations of our study (a relatively small number of samples, one reservoir, and low cyanobacterial biomass), the difference between our result and these authors’ chl a thresholds for prediction of toxin production may be expected. Thus, long-term monitoring appears needed to establish an MC vs. chl a relationship. Although chl a might be used as an indirect indicator of potentially harmful blooms, correlations between toxic cyanobacteria and chl a may vary since cyanobacteria have photosynthetic active pigments other than chl a, and other phytoplankton groups might also contribute chl a [67]. Therefore, although chl a was strongly associated with MC production in the Lobo reservoir (R2 = 0.80, p < 0.001), caution must be taken when using this variable alone for the prediction of the toxic MC genotypes.
Indicators for the prediction of MC production may vary between field sites with changeable conditions and controllable laboratory conditions. This was examined by Ngwa et al. [25], who observed that for laboratory cultures of Microcystis and Planktothrix, the chl a concentration was the best predictor of MC concentrations, followed closely by mcyE gene copy numbers and microscopic cell counts, whereas in environmental samples, mcyE gene copy numbers were the best indicators of MC concentrations, especially in water bodies with mixed populations of toxic and non-toxic cyanobacteria. Similarly, Davis et al. [6] reported that the abundance of the mcyD gene in Microcystis was significantly correlated with microcystin concentrations in three lakes and one pond in the USA, and this gene was a better predictor of MC concentrations than total cell counts or chl a concentrations. These findings reinforce the results found in our study since the mcyE abundance appeared to be the best predictor of potentially microcystin-producing cyanobacteria in the Lobo reservoir (R2 = 0.86, p < 0.001). Thus, our results support the observations by Ngwa et al. [25] and Davis et al. [6] that the application of qPCR may serve as a valuable early monitoring tool that can reliably detect the presence of potentially toxic strains in natural waters. As stated above, chl a can be useful as a complementary tool to the qPCR approach since it is a fast estimate, but caution must be taken when using only this variable for the prediction of toxin production.
As for STX, a moderate but significant correlation was observed between STX concentrations and cyanobacterial biomass (rho = 0.55, p < 0.05). However, a linear regression model calculation indicated that cyanobacterial biomass was not a good fit for the estimation of total STX in the reservoir (R2 = 0.23, p = 0.04). The best predictor of potentially saxitoxin-producing cyanobacteria was the abundance of the sxtA gene (R2 = 0.68, p < 0.001). Therefore, we argue that an estimate of the sxtA gene abundance does not only detect the occurrence of potentially saxitoxin-producing cyanobacteria; it can also serve as an early warning tool for STX concentrations in the water, as stated in other studies [23,24]. However, although the qPCR data from the Lobo reservoir showed that the mcyE and sxtA genes can be used as indicators of microcystin and saxitoxin concentrations, this relationship may not be universal since local environmental factors may affect the toxin’s production. Hence, to confirm the presence of cyanotoxins, chemical analytical methods, such as ELISA and LC-MS, are still needed.

5. Conclusions

Potentially toxin-producing cyanobacteria were permanently present in the Lobo reservoir, but their biomasses varied due to changes in environmental conditions. The abundance of these cyanobacterial strains implies the risk of a persistent occurrence of cyanotoxins in the water. Concentrations of MC and STX varied temporally, but the highest concentrations occurred during the dry winter season. The toxin concentrations were typically low, but in May 2017 in the dam zone, the MC concentrations exceeded the limit for human health of 1.00 µg L−1, despite the occurrence of low cyanobacterial biomass. These results stress the importance of establishing improved monitoring of the quality of water used for human consumption since even low concentrations of MC may threaten human health [68].
In the Lobo reservoir, the presence of MC, STX, and toxic genotypes was influenced by several environmental variables, but their occurrence appeared to be mainly affected by the phosphorus limitation (high TN:TP ratios). Although nutrient limitation may restrict cyanobacterial growth, our results show that nutrient limitation may also cause an increase in toxin production. To better understand mechanisms between nutrient availability, cyanobacterial growth, and toxin production, we recommend that more studies with regular sampling over a longer period and in several water bodies (including this one) be conducted to determine relations between the growth of toxic cyanobacteria and their toxin production under different environmental conditions.
The current Brazilian legislation requires that concentrations of cyanotoxins be quantified weekly, but only if the cyanobacterial density exceeds 20,000 cells mL−1, e.g., during cyanobacterial blooms. However, cyanobacterial density should not be the only criterion for verifying the potential for cyanotoxins production in freshwater systems, since cell counts cannot identify toxic vs. non-toxic species. Therefore, and considering the results from our study, we recommend using the qPCR approach to estimate the presence of potentially toxin-producing cyanobacteria in freshwaters. This will contribute to a reliable and fast risk evaluation to protect water users from hazards associated with toxic cyanobacteria. However, the actual presence of specific cyanotoxins and their concentrations still depend on analytical methods. Therefore, an environmental toolbox for monitoring cyanotoxins, such as MC or STX, should include qPCR detection of the functional genes in conjunction with ELISA or LC-MS analysis to provide better early warning as well as actual toxicity risk.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/environments10080143/s1, Table S1: Main characteristics of the Lobo reservoir; Table S2: Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR, µmol photons m−2 s−1) at surface (100% PAR) and at lower limit of euphotic zone (1% PAR) in the Lobo reservoir; Table S3: Environmental variables summarized as the mean values and ranges, and statistical results (p values) of non-parametric Mann-Whitney test for spatial differences (riverine and dam zone) and non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis for temporal differences (months) of the environmental variables in Lobo reservoir; Table S4: List of the phytoplankton taxa identified in Lobo reservoir.

Author Contributions

M.d.A.B.M. conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, visualization; R.d.A.M.R. investigation, writing—review and editing; R.P. methodology, investigation, writing—review and editing; N.O.G.J. writing—review and editing; M.d.C.C. conceptualization, methodology, writing—review and editing, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)—Brazil, grant number 2016/09405-1. M.d.A.B.M. was funded by FAPESP, grant numbers 2015/21191-4 and 2018/00394-2. R.d.A.M.R. was funded by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)—Brazil, grant number (finance number) 001, and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)—Brazil, grant number 142176/2016-8.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study will be made available upon request to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Paerl, H.W. Mitigating Toxic Planktonic Cyanobacterial Blooms in Aquatic Ecosystems Facing Increasing Anthropogenic and Climatic Pressures. Toxins 2018, 10, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Subbiah, S.; Karnjanapiboonwong, A.; Maul, J.D.; Wang, D.; Anderson, T.A. Monitoring Cyanobacterial Toxins in a Large Reservoir: Relationships with Water Quality Parameters. PeerJ 2019, 2019, e7305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Rinta-Kanto, J.M.; Konopko, E.A.; DeBruyn, J.M.; Bourbonniere, R.A.; Boyer, G.L.; Wilhelm, S.W. Lake Erie Microcystis: Relationship between Microcystin Production, Dynamics of Genotypes and Environmental Parameters in a Large Lake. Harmful Algae 2009, 8, 665–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lee, T.A.; Rollwagen-Bollens, G.; Bollens, S.M.; Faber-Hammond, J.J. Environmental Influence on Cyanobacteria Abundance and Microcystin Toxin Production in a Shallow Temperate Lake. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 114, 318–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Vargas, S.R.; dos Santos, P.V.; Bottino, F.; Calijuri, M.D.C. Effect of Nutrient Concentration on Growth and Saxitoxin Production of Raphidiopsis raciborskii (Cyanophyta) Interacting with Monoraphidium contortum (Chlorophyceae). J. Appl. Phycol. 2019, 32, 421–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Davis, T.W.; Berry, D.L.; Boyer, G.L.; Gobler, C.J. The Effects of Temperature and Nutrients on the Growth and Dynamics of Toxic and Non-Toxic Strains of Microcystis during Cyanobacteria Blooms. Harmful Algae 2009, 8, 715–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cirés, S.; Delgado, A.; González-Pleiter, M.; Quesada, A. Temperature Influences the Production and Transport of Saxitoxin and the Expression of Sxt Genes in the Cyanobacterium Aphanizomenon gracile. Toxins 2017, 9, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Renaud, S.L.B.; Pick, F.R.; Fortin, N. Effect of Light Intensity on the Relative Dominance of Toxigenic and Nontoxigenic Strains of Microcystis aeruginosa. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 7016–7022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Long, S.; Hamilton, P.B.; Yang, Y.; Ma, J.; Chobet, O.C.; Chen, C.; Liu, Z.; Dong, X.; Dang, A.; Chen, J. Multi-Year Succession of Cyanobacteria Blooms in a Highland Reservoir with Changing Nutrient Status, Guizhou Province, China. J. Limnol. 2018, 77, 232–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Li, X.; Huo, S.; Zhang, J.; Xiao, Z.; Xi, B.; Li, R. Factors Related to Aggravated Cylindrospermopsis (Cyanobacteria) Bloom Following Sediment Dredging in an Eutrophic Shallow Lake. Environ. Sci. Ecotechnol. 2020, 2, 100014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, Z.; Fan, X.; Peijnenburg, W.J.G.M.; Zhang, M.; Sun, L.; Zhai, Y.; Yu, Q.; Wu, J.; Lu, T.; Qian, H. Alteration of Dominant Cyanobacteria in Different Bloom Periods Caused by Abiotic Factors and Species Interactions. J. Environ. Sci. 2021, 99, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fortin, N.; Aranda-Rodriguez, R.; Jing, H.; Pick, F.; Bird, D.; Greer, C.W. Detection of Microcystin-Producing Cyanobacteria in Missisquoi Bay, Quebec, Canada, Using Quantitative PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 5105–5112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Yang, J.; Lv, H.; Yang, J.; Liu, L.; Yu, X.; Chen, H. Decline in Water Level Boosts Cyanobacteria Dominance in Subtropical Reservoirs. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 557–558, 445–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kosten, S.; Huszar, V.L.M.; Bécares, E.; Costa, L.S.; Van Donk, E.; Hansson, L.-A.; Jeppesen, E.; Kruk, C.; Lacerot, G.; Mazzeo, N.; et al. Warmer Climates Boost Cyanobacterial Dominance in Shallow Lakes. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2012, 18, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gkelis, S.; Papadimitriou, T.; Zaoutsos, N.; Leonardos, I. Anthropogenic and Climate-Induced Change Favors Toxic Cyanobacteria Blooms: Evidence from Monitoring a Highly Eutrophic, Urban Mediterranean Lake. Harmful Algae 2014, 39, 322–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rigosi, A.; Carey, C.C.; Ibelings, B.W.; Brookes, J.D. The Interaction between Climate Warming and Eutrophication to Promote Cyanobacteria Is Dependent on Trophic State and Varies among Taxa. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2014, 59, 99–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Merel, S.; Walker, D.; Chicana, R.; Snyder, S.; Baurès, E.; Thomas, O. State of Knowledge and Concerns on Cyanobacterial Blooms and Cyanotoxins. Environ. Int. 2013, 59, 303–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tillett, D.; Dittmann, E.; Erhard, M.; Von Do, H.; Bo, T.; Neilan, B.A. Structural Organization of Microcystin Biosynthesis in Microcystis aeruginosa PCC7806: An Integrated Peptide-Polyketide Synthetase System. Chem. Biol. 2000, 7, 753–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Rouhiainen, L.; Vakkilainen, T.; Siemer, B.L.; Buikema, W.; Haselkorn, R.; Sivonen, K. Genes Coding for Hepatotoxic Heptapeptides (Microcystins) in the Cyanobacterium Anabaena Strain 90. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 686–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Kellmann, R.; Mihali, T.K.; Young, J.J.; Pickford, R.; Pomati, F.; Neilan, B.A. Biosynthetic Intermediate Analysis and Functional Homology Reveal a Saxitoxin Gene Cluster in Cyanobacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 4044–4053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Mihali, T.K.; Kellmann, R.; Neilan, B.A. Characterisation of the Paralytic Shellfish Toxin Biosynthesis Gene Clusters in Anabaena circinalis AWQC131C and Aphanizomenon Sp. NH-5. BMC Biochem. 2009, 10, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Pacheco, A.B.F.; Guedes, I.A.; Azevedo, S.M.F.O. Is QPCR a Reliable Indicator of Cyanotoxin Risk in Freshwater? Toxins 2016, 8, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Al-Tebrineh, J.; Mihali, T.K.; Pomati, F.; Neilan, B.A. Detection of Saxitoxin-Producing Cyanobacteria and Anabaena circinalis in Environmental Water Blooms by Quantitative PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 7836–7842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Al-Tebrineh, J.; Merrick, C.; Ryan, D.; Humpage, A.; Bowling, L.; Neilan, B.A. Community Composition, Toxigenicity, and Environmental Conditions during a Cyanobacterial Bloom Occurring along 1,100 Kilometers of the Murray River. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Ngwa, F.F.; Madramootoo, C.A.; Jabaji, S. Comparison of Cyanobacterial Microcystin Synthetase (mcy) E Gene Transcript Levels, mcy E Gene Copies, and Biomass as Indicators of Microcystin Risk under Laboratory and Field Conditions. Microbiologyopen 2014, 3, 411–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Periotto, N.A.; Tundisi, J.G. Ecosystem Services of UHE Carlos Botelho (Lobo/Broa): A New Approach for Management and Planning of Dams Multiple-Uses. Braz. J. Biol. 2013, 73, 471–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Aguilera, A.; Gómez, E.B.; Kaštovský, J.; Echenique, R.O.; Salerno, G.L. The Polyphasic Analysis of Two Native Raphidiopsis Isolates Supports the Unification of the Genera Raphidiopsis and Cylindrospermopsis (Nostocales, Cyanobacteria). Phycologia 2018, 57, 130–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tundisi, J.G.; Matsumura-Tundisi, T.; Tundisi, J.E.M.; Blanco, F.P.; Abe, D.S.; Contri Campanelli, L.; Sidagis Galli, G.; Silva, V.T.; Lima, C.P.P. A Bloom of Cyanobacteria (Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii) in UHE Carlos Botelho (Lobo/Broa) Reservoir: A Consequence of Global Change? Braz. J. Biol. 2015, 75, 507–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Vicentin, A.M.; Rodrigues, E.H.C.; Moschini-Carlos, V.; Pompêo, M.L.M. Is It Possible to Evaluate the Ecological Status of a Reservoir Using the Phytoplankton Community? Acta Limnol. Bras. 2018, 30, e306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Rodrigues, E.H.C.; Vicentin, A.M.; Machado, L.d.S.; Pompêo, M.L.M.; Moschini-Carlos, V. Phytoplankton, Trophic State and Ecological Potential in Reservoirs in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. Rev. Ambiente Agua 2019, 14, e2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nusch, E.A. Comparison of Different Methods for Chlorophyll and Pheopigment Determination. Arch. Hydrobiol. 1980, 14, 14–36. [Google Scholar]
  32. APHA; AWWA; WPCF. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 25th ed.; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA; American Water Works Association: Washington, DC, USA; Water Pollution Control Federation: Washington, DC, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  33. Cunha, D.G.F.; Calijuri, M.d.C.; Lamparelli, M.C. A Trophic State Index for Tropical/Subtropical Reservoirs (TSItsr). Ecol. Eng. 2013, 60, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Utermöhl, H. Zur Vervollkommnung Der Quantitativen Phytoplankton-Methodik. Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol. Mitteilungen 1958, 9, 1–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Komárek, J.; Anagnostidis, K. Cyanoprokaryota 1. Chroococcales. In Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa 19/1; Ettl, H., Gärtner, G., Heynig, H., Mollenhauer, D., Eds.; Gustav Fischer, Jena-Stuttgart Lübeck-Ulm: Berlin, Germany, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  36. Wehr, J.; Sheath, R.G. Freshwater Algae of North America: Ecology and Classification; Academic Press: Cambridge, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  37. Sant’Anna, C.L.; Azevedo, M.T.P.; Senna, P.A.C.; Komárek, J.; Komárková, J. Planktic Cyanobacteria from São Paulo State, Brazil: Chroococcales. Rev. Bras. Botânica 2004, 27, 213–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Komárek, J.; Anagnostidis, K. Cyanoprokaryota. 2. Oscillatoriales. In Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa 19/2; Büdel, B., Krienitz, L., Gärtner, G., Schagerl, M., Eds.; Elsevier/Spektrum: Heidelberg, Germany, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  39. Komárek, J. Cyanoprokaryota. 3. Heterocytous Genera. In Süswasserflora von Mitteleuropa/Freshwater Flora of Central Europe; Büdel, B., Gärtner, G., Krienitz, L., Schagerl, M., Eds.; Springer Spektrum: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  40. Bicudo, C.E.M.; Menezes, M. Gêneros de Algas de Águas Continentais Do Brasil: Chave Para Identificação e Descrições; RiMa Editoras: São Carlos, Brazil, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  41. Hillebrand, H.; Dürselen, C.D.; Kirschtel, D.; Pollingher, U.; Zohary, T. Biovolume Calculation for Pelagic and Benthic Microalgae. J. Phycol. 1999, 35, 403–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sun, J.; Liu, D. Geometric Models for Calculating Cell Biovolume and Surface Area for Phytoplankton. J. Plankton Res. 2003, 25, 1331–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Wetzel, R.G.; Likens, G.E. Composition and Biomass of Phytoplankton. In Limnological Analyses; Wetzel, R.G., Likens, G.E., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2000; pp. 147–174. [Google Scholar]
  44. Desjardins, P.; Conklin, D. NanoDrop Microvolume Quantitation of Nucleic Acids. J. Vis. Exp. 2010, 45, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Moraes, M.A.B.; Rodrigues, R.A.M.; Schlüter, L.; Podduturi, R.; Jørgensen, N.O.G.; Calijuri, M.C. Influence of Environmental Factors on Occurrence of Cyanobacteria and Abundance of Saxitoxin-Producing Cyanobacteria in a Subtropical Drinking Water Reservoir in Brazil. Water 2021, 13, 1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hammer, Ø.; Harper, D.A.T.; Ryan, P.D. Past: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education. Palaeontol. Electron. 2001, 4, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  47. Pearson, L.; Mihali, T.; Moffitt, M.; Kellmann, R.; Neilan, B. On the Chemistry, Toxicology and Genetics of the Cyanobacterial Toxins, Microcystin, Nodularin, Saxitoxin and Cylindrospermopsin. Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 1650–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Paerl, H.W.; Otten, T.G. Harmful Cyanobacterial Blooms: Causes, Consequences, and Controls. Microb. Ecol. 2013, 65, 995–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Borges, H.L.F.; Branco, L.H.Z.; Martins, M.D.; Lima, C.S.; Barbosa, P.T.; Lira, G.A.S.T.; Bittencourt-Oliveira, M.C.; Molica, R.J.R. Cyanotoxin Production and Phylogeny of Benthic Cyanobacterial Strains Isolated from the Northeast of Brazil. Harmful Algae 2015, 43, 46–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Barboza, G.; Gorlach-Lira, K.; Sassi, C.; Sassi, R. Microcystins Production and Antibacterial Activity of Cyanobacterial Strains of Synechocystis, Synechococcus and Romeria Isolated from Water and Coral Reef Organisms of Brazilian Coast. Rev. Biol. Trop. 2017, 65, 890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Cordeiro, R.; Azevedo, J.; Luz, R.; Vasconcelos, V.; Gonçalves, V.; Fonseca, A. Cyanotoxin Screening in BACA Culture Collection: Identification of New Cylindrospermopsin Producing Cyanobacteria. Toxins 2021, 13, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ministério da Saúde do Brasil. Portaria MS 2914 de 12 de Dezembro de 2011. Dispõe Sobre Os Procedimentos de Controle e de Vigilância Da Qualidade Da Água Para Consumo Humano e Seu Padrão de Potabilidade; Ministério da Saúde do Brasil: Brasília, Brasil, 2011; 38p. [Google Scholar]
  53. Brandenburg, K.; Siebers, L.; Keuskamp, J.; Jephcott, T.G.; van de Waal, D.B. Effects of Nutrient Limitation on the Synthesis of N-Rich Phytoplankton Toxins: A Meta-Analysis. Toxins 2020, 12, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Ginn, H.P.; Pearson, L.A.; Neilan, B.A. NtcA from Microcystis aeruginosa PCC 7806 Is Autoregulatory and Binds to the Microcystin Promoter. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 4362–4368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Dias, E.; Pereira, P.; Franca, S. Production of Paralytic Shellfish Toxins by Aphanizomenon Sp. LMECYA 31 (Cyanobacteria) 1. J. Phycol. 2002, 38, 705–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Casero, M.C.; Ballot, A.; Agha, R.; Quesada, A.; Cirés, S. Characterization of Saxitoxin Production and Release and Phylogeny of sxt Genes in Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning Toxin-Producing Aphanizomenon gracile. Harmful Algae 2014, 37, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chislock, M.F.; Sharp, K.L.; Wilson, A.E. Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii Dominates under Very Low and High Nitrogen-to-Phosphorus Ratios. Water Res. 2014, 49, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tao, M.; Xie, P.; Chen, J.; Qin, B.; Zhang, D.; Niu, Y.; Zhang, M.; Wang, Q.; Wu, L. Use of a Generalized Additive Model to Investigate Key Abiotic Factors Affecting Microcystin Cellular Quotas in Heavy Bloom Areas of Lake Taihu. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e32020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lahti, K.; Rapala, J.; Färdig, M.; Niemelä, M.; Sivonen, K. Persistence of Cyanobacterial Hepatoxin, Microcystin-LR in Particulate Material and Dissolved in Lake Water. Wat. Res. 1997, 31, 1005–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zastepa, A.; Pick, F.R.; Blais, J.M. Fate and Persistence of Particulate and Dissolved Microcystin-LA from Microcystis Blooms. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 2014, 20, 1670–1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Nimptsch, J.; Woelfl, S.; Osorio, S.; Valenzuela, J.; Moreira, C.; Ramos, V.; Castelo-Branco, R.; Leão, P.N.; Vasconcelos, V. First Record of Toxins Associated with Cyanobacterial Blooms in Oligotrophic North Patagonian Lakes of Chile—A Genomic Approach. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. 2016, 101, 57–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Savela, H.; Spoof, L.; Perälä, N.; Preede, M.; Lamminmäki, U.; Nybom, S.; Häggqvist, K.; Meriluoto, J.; Vehniäinen, M. Detection of Cyanobacterial sxt Genes and Paralytic Shellfish Toxins in Freshwater Lakes and Brackish Waters on Åland Islands, Finland. Harmful Algae 2015, 46, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Oh, K.H.; Jeong, D.H.; Cho, Y.C. Quantification of Toxigenic Microcystis Spp. in Freshwaters by Quantitative Real-Time PCR Based on the Microcystin Synthetase a Gene. J. Microbiol. 2013, 51, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Guedes, I.A.; da Costa Leite, D.M.; Manhães, L.A.; Bisch, P.M.; Azevedo, S.M.F.O.; Pacheco, A.B.F. Fluctuations in Microcystin Concentrations, Potentially Toxic Microcystis and Genotype Diversity in a Cyanobacterial Community from a Tropical Reservoir. Harmful Algae 2014, 39, 303–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Gao, Y.; Yu, R.C.; Murray, S.A.; Chen, J.H.; Kang, Z.J.; Zhang, Q.C.; Kong, F.Z.; Zhou, M.J. High Specificity of a Quantitative PCR Assay Targeting a Saxitoxin Gene for Monitoring Toxic Algae Associated with Paralytic Shellfish Toxins in the Yellow Sea. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 6973–6981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Shang, L.; Feng, M.; Liu, F.; Xu, X.; Ke, F.; Chen, X.; Li, W. The Establishment of Preliminary Safety Threshold Values for Cyanobacteria Based on Periodic Variations in Different Microcystin Congeners in Lake Chaohu, China. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 2015, 17, 728–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Cunha, D.G.F.; Dodds, W.K.; Loiselle, S.A. Factors Related to Water Quality and Thresholds for Microcystin Concentrations in Subtropical Brazilian Reservoirs. Inland Waters 2018, 8, 368–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Falconer, I.; Bartram, J.; Chorus, I.; Kuiper-Goodman, T.; Utkilen, H.; Burch, M.; Codd, G.A. Safe Levels and Safe Practices. In Toxic Cyanobacteria in Water: A Guide to Their Public Health Consequences, Monitoring and Management; Chorus, I., Bartram, J., Eds.; E & FN Spon: London, UK, 1999; pp. 162–183. [Google Scholar]
Environments 10 00143 g001
Figure 1. Sampling sites in Lobo reservoir, São Paulo State, Brazil: riverine zone (22°12′36.9″ S, 47°52′52.8″ W) and dam zone (22°10′18.5″ S, 47°54′11.2″ W).
Figure 1. Sampling sites in Lobo reservoir, São Paulo State, Brazil: riverine zone (22°12′36.9″ S, 47°52′52.8″ W) and dam zone (22°10′18.5″ S, 47°54′11.2″ W).
Environments 10 00143 g001
Environments 10 00143 g002
Figure 2. (a) Biomass (mg L−1) of the total phytoplankton community and cyanobacteria and (b) relative biomass (%) of phytoplankton groups in the Lobo reservoir; 100 = surface; 1 = lower limit of euphotic zone.
Figure 2. (a) Biomass (mg L−1) of the total phytoplankton community and cyanobacteria and (b) relative biomass (%) of phytoplankton groups in the Lobo reservoir; 100 = surface; 1 = lower limit of euphotic zone.
Environments 10 00143 g002
Environments 10 00143 g003
Figure 3. Biomass (mg L−1) of cyanobacteria identified in the Lobo reservoir; 100 = surface; 1 = lower limit of euphotic zone.
Figure 3. Biomass (mg L−1) of cyanobacteria identified in the Lobo reservoir; 100 = surface; 1 = lower limit of euphotic zone.
Environments 10 00143 g003
Environments 10 00143 g004
Figure 4. Abundance of mcyE gene (copies mL−1) and microcystin concentration (MC, µg L−1) in the Lobo reservoir. Error bars indicate standard deviations of triplicate samples; 100 = surface; 1 = lower limit of euphotic zone.
Figure 4. Abundance of mcyE gene (copies mL−1) and microcystin concentration (MC, µg L−1) in the Lobo reservoir. Error bars indicate standard deviations of triplicate samples; 100 = surface; 1 = lower limit of euphotic zone.
Environments 10 00143 g004
Environments 10 00143 g005
Figure 5. Abundance of the sxtA gene (cells mL−1) and saxitoxin concentration (STX, µg L−1) in the Lobo reservoir. Error bars show standard deviations of triplicate samples; 100 = surface; 1 = lower limit of euphotic zone.
Figure 5. Abundance of the sxtA gene (cells mL−1) and saxitoxin concentration (STX, µg L−1) in the Lobo reservoir. Error bars show standard deviations of triplicate samples; 100 = surface; 1 = lower limit of euphotic zone.
Environments 10 00143 g005
Environments 10 00143 g006
Figure 6. Ordination biplot by principal component analysis (PCA) of sample units generated from nine environmental variables in the Lobo reservoir. The sampling times were May 2017 (black), August 2017 (red), October 2017 (orange) and January 2018 (green). The riverine zone is represented by circles (●○), and dam zone is represented by squares (■□). Filled dots (●) or squares (■) represent the depth 100 (surface), while empty (○) dots and squares (□) represent the depth 1 (lower limit of euphotic zone). TP = total phosphorus; EC = electrical conductivity; SRP = soluble reactive phosphorus; STX = saxitoxin; MC = microcystin; Chl a = chlorophyll a.
Figure 6. Ordination biplot by principal component analysis (PCA) of sample units generated from nine environmental variables in the Lobo reservoir. The sampling times were May 2017 (black), August 2017 (red), October 2017 (orange) and January 2018 (green). The riverine zone is represented by circles (●○), and dam zone is represented by squares (■□). Filled dots (●) or squares (■) represent the depth 100 (surface), while empty (○) dots and squares (□) represent the depth 1 (lower limit of euphotic zone). TP = total phosphorus; EC = electrical conductivity; SRP = soluble reactive phosphorus; STX = saxitoxin; MC = microcystin; Chl a = chlorophyll a.
Environments 10 00143 g006
Table 1. Spearman rank correlation coefficients (rho) between environmental variables, cyanobacterial biomass, microcystin concentration, mcyE gene numbers, saxitoxin concentrations, and sxtA gene numbers in Lobo reservoir (n = 16). Significant correlations (p < 0.05) are highlighted in bold.
Table 1. Spearman rank correlation coefficients (rho) between environmental variables, cyanobacterial biomass, microcystin concentration, mcyE gene numbers, saxitoxin concentrations, and sxtA gene numbers in Lobo reservoir (n = 16). Significant correlations (p < 0.05) are highlighted in bold.
ECNO2−-NTPSRPChl aMCmcyESTXsxtA
Cyanobacterial biomass−0.59−0.53−0.55−0.080.270.320.490.550.69
MC−0.11−0.62−0.360.330.71-0.75--
mcyE−0.62−0.51−0.650.140.750.75---
STX−0.13−0.37−0.270.510.20---0.78
sxtA−0.40−0.52−0.360.280.21--0.78-
EC = electrical conductivity; NO2−-N = nitrite; TP = total phosphorus; SRP = soluble reactive phosphorus; Chl a = chlorophyll a; MC = microcystin; STX = saxitoxin.
Table 2. Linear regression of microcystin and saxitoxin concentrations to other measured variables (n = 16).
Table 2. Linear regression of microcystin and saxitoxin concentrations to other measured variables (n = 16).
VariablesMicrocystinSaxitoxin
R2 Adjp ValueR2 Adjp Value
Chlorophyll a0.80< 0.001--
mcyE0.86< 0.001--
Cyanobacterial biomass--0.230.04
sxtA--0.68< 0.001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Moraes, M.d.A.B.; Rodrigues, R.d.A.M.; Podduturi, R.; Jørgensen, N.O.G.; Calijuri, M.d.C. Prediction of Cyanotoxin Episodes in Freshwater: A Case Study on Microcystin and Saxitoxin in the Lobo Reservoir, São Paulo State, Brazil. Environments 2023, 10, 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments10080143

AMA Style

Moraes MdAB, Rodrigues RdAM, Podduturi R, Jørgensen NOG, Calijuri MdC. Prediction of Cyanotoxin Episodes in Freshwater: A Case Study on Microcystin and Saxitoxin in the Lobo Reservoir, São Paulo State, Brazil. Environments. 2023; 10(8):143. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments10080143

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moraes, Munique de Almeida Bispo, Raphaella de Abreu Magalhães Rodrigues, Raju Podduturi, Niels Ole Gerslev Jørgensen, and Maria do Carmo Calijuri. 2023. "Prediction of Cyanotoxin Episodes in Freshwater: A Case Study on Microcystin and Saxitoxin in the Lobo Reservoir, São Paulo State, Brazil" Environments 10, no. 8: 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments10080143

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop