Next Article in Journal
Oxidative Stress Response of Aspergillus oryzae Induced by Hydrogen Peroxide and Menadione Sodium Bisulfite
Next Article in Special Issue
Horizontal Gene Transfer and Its Association with Antibiotic Resistance in the Genus Aeromonas spp.
Previous Article in Journal
Inhibition and Interactions of Campylobacter jejuni from Broiler Chicken Houses with Organic Acids
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Significance of Mesophilic Aeromonas spp. in Minimally Processed Ready-to-Eat Seafood
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 7
Issue 8
10.3390/microorganisms7080224
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Wild Nutria (Myocastor coypus) Is a Potential Reservoir of Carbapenem-Resistant and Zoonotic Aeromonas spp. in Korea

by
Se Ra Lim
1,2,†,
Do-Hun Lee
3,†,
Seon Young Park
1,
Seungki Lee
4,
Hyo Yeon Kim
1,
Moo-Seung Lee
5,
Jung Ro Lee
3,
Jee Eun Han
6,
Hye Kwon Kim
7 and
Ji Hyung Kim
1,2,*,†
1
Infectious Disease Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon 34141, Korea
2
Department of Biomolecular Science, KRIBB School of Bioscience, Korea University of Science and Technology (UST), Daejeon 34113, Korea
3
Division of Ecological Conservation Research, National Institute of Ecology, Seocheon 33657, Korea
4
Biological and Genetic Resources Assessment Division, National Institute of Biological Resources, Incheon 22689, Korea
5
Environmental Diseases Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, 125 Gwahak-ro, Daejeon 34141, Korea
6
Laboratory of Aquatic Biomedicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea
7
Department of Microbiology, College of Natural Sciences, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Microorganisms 2019, 7(8), 224; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7080224
Submission received: 2 July 2019 / Revised: 26 July 2019 / Accepted: 29 July 2019 / Published: 30 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue An Update on Aeromonas)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The emergence and spread of antibiotic-resistant Aeromonas spp. is a serious public and animal health concern. Wild animals serve as reservoirs, vectors, and sentinels of these bacteria and can facilitate their transmission to humans and livestock. The nutria (Myocastor coypus), a semi-aquatic rodent, currently is globally considered an invasive alien species that has harmful impacts on natural ecosystems and carries various zoonotic aquatic pathogens. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant zoonotic Aeromonas spp. in wild invasive nutrias captured in Korea during governmental eradication program. Three potential zoonotic Aeromonas spp. (A. hydrophila, A. caviae, and A. dhakensis) were identified among isolates from nutria. Some strains showed unexpected resistance to fluoroquinolones, third-generation cephalosporins, and carbapenems. In carbapenem-resistant isolates, the cphA gene, which is related to intrinsic resistance of Aeromonas to carbapenems, was identified, and phylogenetic analysis based on this gene revealed the presence of two major groups represented by A. hydrophila (including A. dhakensis) and other Aeromonas spp. These results indicate that wild nutrias in Korea are a potential reservoir of zoonotic and antibiotic-resistant Aeromonas spp. that can cause infection and treatment failure in humans. Thus, measures to prevent contact of wild nutrias with livestock and humans are needed.

1. Introduction

The genus Aeromonas, which belongs to the family Aeromonadaceae, comprises ubiquitous Gram-negative bacilli found in various aquatic environments and organisms [1]. Among 36 recently described species of the genus (http://www.bacterio.net/), several are known as pathogens of cold-blooded animals, including fish and amphibians, and interest in this genus has increased because of its zoonotic potential [2]. In particular, some aeromonads have been recognized as causative agents of human diseases, including gastroenteritis, skin infections, septicemia, peritonitis, pneumonia, and diarrhea [3,4,5]. Of the currently recognized Aeromonas species, A. hydrophila, A. caviae, and A. veronii biovar. sobria are the most common species known to cause the majority of human infections [6]. Recently, A. dhakensis has been considered the principal species causing bacteremia and soft tissue infection [7]. Although the mode of transmission of these pathogens is not clearly understood, recreational or occupational activities in water (e.g., fishing or swimming) and consumption of contaminated food or water are considered potential transmission routes [5]. Recent studies have indicated that domestic and wild animals also can be sources of transmission to humans [8,9,10,11,12,13].
Interest in Aeromonas has increased owing to the emergence of strains that are resistant to commercial antibiotics commonly used in aquaculture and veterinary practice [3,14]. The acquisition of antibiotic-resistance genes of diverse environmental origins in this genus poses a serious potential public health risk [15,16]. Although aeromonads resistant to tetracyclines and quinolones have been reported [17,18,19], their intrinsic resistance against β-lactam antibiotics is of great concern [16,20]. Most aeromonads produce chromosomally encoded β-lactamases, including three principal Ambler classes: class C cephalosporinases, class D penicillinases, and class B metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) [21,22]. Several MBLs, including ImiS [23], ImiH [24], AsbM1 [25], IMP-19 [26], VIM [27], and CphA [28], have been identified in Aeromonas, and clinically relevant Aeromonas species harboring MBLs are considered a severe public health risk [20]. The best studied MBL gene in the genus Aeromonas is cphA [28], which encodes a carbapenem-hydrolyzing MBL that has very specific activity towards carbapenems, the last-resort antibiotics selectively applied to treat severe clinical infections [29,30].
The nutria (or coypu, Myocastor coypus) is semi-aquatic rodent native to South America. The International Union for Conservation of Nature and the European Union currently consider this animal to be one of the worst invasive alien species globally because it has harmful impacts on native plant biodiversity and natural ecosystems [31,32]. Nutrias were introduced in Korea in 1985 for fur and meat production, but some of the animals escaped into natural habitats and successfully established wild populations [33,34]. Recently, the Korean government has also designated nutria as an alien species and implemented a control and eradication program [35]. The nutria is known as a carrier of various zoonotic aquatic pathogens that can transmit diseases to livestock and humans [36,37,38].
The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence of zoonotic Aeromonas spp. in wild invasive nutrias captured in Korea between 2016 and 2017. Additionally, we aimed to identify potential virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance mechanisms in Aeromonas isolates. Our study findings emphasize the need for predicting and preventing the spread of antibiotic-resistant pathogenic aeromonads and to implement the “One Health” approach to emerging public health threats. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to assess the potential virulence and antibiotic resistance in Aeromonas spp. isolated from wild nutrias.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Isolation and Culture Conditions

Between 2016 and 2017, fresh carcasses of 26 wild nutria (Myocastor coypus), which were captured throughout the tributary of Nakdong River (35°19′16.7″N 128°48′25.0″E), were supplied by a network of hunters in Gimhae (Gyeongnam province, South Korea) in the context of an eradication program of the Korean government. Sterile swabs were used to collect specimens from the external wounds, nasal, and rectal cavities of the animals. Bacteria were isolated using a standard dilution plating technique on 5% sheep blood agar (BA; Synergy Innovation, Seongnam, Korea) by incubating them at 37 °C for 24 h. To assess strain purity, single colonies were selected and subcultured three times, and then, the isolated bacteria were identified by 16S rDNA sequencing (Macrogen Inc., Seoul, Korea). Biochemical characteristics of isolates identified as members of the genus Aeromonas (Table 1) were analyzed using the API 20E system (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Étoile, France) following the manufacturer’s protocol. All confirmed Aeromonas isolates were stored in tryptic soy broth (Difco, Detroit, MI) with 10% glycerol at −80 °C until use.

2.2. Species Discrimination

Aeromonas isolates were cultured overnight on BA at 37 °C. Bacterial genomic DNA was isolated using a DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit (Qiagen Korea Ltd., Seoul, Korea) following the manufacturer’s protocol. For species discrimination, first, the gyrB gene, which encodes DNA gyrase subunit B, was amplified and sequenced using the primers gyrB3F/gyrB14R [39]. Second, the rpoB gene, which encodes the β-subunit of DNA-dependent RNA polymerase, was amplified and sequenced using the primers Pasrpob-L/Rpob-R [40]. The sets of primers used for amplification and sequencing of gyrB and rpoB are listed in Table S1. The gyrB and rpoB sequences of the isolates were, respectively, compared with representative sequences from each type strain of Aeromonas species in the GenBank database by BLAST searches (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST). In addition, the gyrB sequences of the isolates were aligned with representative sequences from each type strain of Aeromonas species using ClustalX (version 2.1) [41] and BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor (version 7.1.0.3) [42]. Then, the datasets were phylogenetically analyzed using the MEGA ver. 7.0 [43]. A neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree was constructed using a Jukes–Cantor distances matrix, and the reliability of the tree was assessed using 1,000 bootstrap replicates. Finally, 14 Aeromonas isolates were identified to the species level.

2.3. Determination of Virulence-Associated Genes

To evaluate the pathogenic potential of the Aeromonas isolates, several PCR-based methods were used to determine the distribution of the genes coding for cytotoxic heat-labile enterotoxin (act, also known as aerolysin/hemolysin), serine protease (aspA), heat-labile (alt) and heat-stable (ast) cytotoxins, components of the type 3 (aexT and ascV) and type 6 (vasH) secretion systems, lateral (lafA) and polar (flaA) flagella, bundle-forming pilus (BfpA and BfpG) and Shiga-like toxin (stx-1 and stx-2), as previously described [15]. The sets of primers used for amplification and sequencing of these genes are listed in Table S1. PCR conditions for gene amplification were based on previous studied referenced in Table S1. Strains yielding amplicons of the expected size were sequenced and the sequences were compared to the GenBank database.

2.4. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolated aeromonads was evaluated by the disk diffusion method according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [44,45]. In total, 20 antimicrobial agents (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, UK) of nine classes were used: penicillins and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (ampicillin/sulbactam (10/10 μg), amoxycillin/clavulanic acid (20/10 μg), and piperacillin/tazobactam (100/10 μg)), cephems (cephalothin (30 μg), cephazolin (30 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), cefuroxime (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), and cefepime (30 μg)), carbapenems (imipenem (10 μg) and meropenem (10 μg)), a monobactam (aztreonam (30 μg)), aminoglycosides (amikacin (30 μg) and gentamicin (10 μg)), a tetracycline (tetracycline (30 μg)), fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin (5 μg) and levofloxacin (5 μg)), folate pathway inhibitors (trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg)), and a phenicol (chloramphenicol (30 μg)). The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of six selected antimicrobial agents (amoxicillin (256–0.015 μg), amoxycillin/clavulanic acid (256–0.015 μg), ampicillin (256–0.015 μg), cefotaxime (256–0.015 μg), imipenem (32–0.002 μg), and meropenem (32–0.002 μg)) were determined using MIC Evaluator Strips (Oxoid Ltd.). Inhibition zones and MICs were interpreted based on CLSI guidelines [44,45]. For quality control, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and ATCC 35218 were used.

2.5. Determination of Antibiotic Resistance Genes and Phylogenetic Analysis of the cphA Gene

The genetic determinants associated with resistance to tetracycline, quinolones, β-lactams, cephalosporins, and carbapenems in the 14 Aeromonas isolates were investigated by PCR analyses. In addition, the isolates were screened for the existence of class 1 integrons, which are gene cassettes encoding resistance to various antimicrobials. The sets of primers used for amplification and sequencing of these genes are listed in Table S1. Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences of the cphA genes of the Aeromonas isolates were compared and aligned with representative cphA variants in Aeromonadaceae available from GenBank, including cphA (GenBank accession no. X57102), cphA2 (U60294), cphA3 (AY112998), cphA4 (KM609958), cphA5 (KP771880), cphA6 (AY227052), cphA7 (AY227053), and cphA8 (AY261375). The deduced amino acid sequences of the cphA genes were phylogenetically analyzed using the maximum-likelihood (ML) method with 1,000 bootstrap replicates in MEGA ver. 7.0 [43]. An ML tree was constructed using the suggested WAG+G model with the option of complete deletion of gaps and missing data.

2.6. Nucleotide Sequence and Strain Deposition

All gyrB and cphA nucleotide sequences of the Aeromonas isolates in this study have been deposited in GenBank database under accession numbers MK495855–MK495868 and MK415746–MK415756, respectively. A living axenic culture of each of the 14 Aeromonas isolates has been deposited in the Korean Culture Center of Microorganisms (KCCM); the accession numbers are provided in Table 1.

3. Results and Discussion

Several Aeromonas spp. have been reported as important zoonotic pathogens based on their virulence and antibiotic resistance profiles [2]. Although the mode of transmission is not completely understood, recent studies have indicated that domestic and wild animals are potential sources of transmission to humans [8,9,10,11,12,13]. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the incidence of potential zoonotic Aeromonas spp. in wild invasive nutria thriving in Korea and to investigate their virulence and antibiotic resistance to allow the development of measures to effectively control dissemination to humans.

3.1. Wild Nutria Is a Potential Reservoir of Zoonotic Aeromonas spp.

Twenty-six fresh carcasses of wild nutria captured in a tributary of Nakdong River (Gyeongnam province, Korea) in the context of an eradication program of the Korean government between 2016 and 2017 were supplied by a network of hunters. Bacterial strains isolated from external wounds, nasal, and rectal cavities of the animals were analyzed by biochemical tests (Table S2) and 16S rDNA sequencing. In total, 14 β-hemolytic isolates were identified as members of the genus Aeromonas. Although several studies on Aeromonas in wild and domestic animals have revealed its ecological importance as a potential zoonotic pathogen, the identification of the genus in those studies was mainly based on phenotypic traits and 16S rDNAs of the isolates [8,9,46,47] and did not fully reflect its recent taxonomy based on housekeeping genes [48]. Therefore, we further sequenced the housekeeping genes (gyrB and rpoB) of Aeromonas isolates to clarify its taxonomical positions. Based on species discrimination of the aeromonads on the basis of gyrB and rpoB sequence comparisons, four Aeromonas species (A. hydrophila (n = 10), A. caviae (n = 2), A. dhakensis (n = 1), and A. rivipollensis (n = 1)) were identified (Table 1 and Figure 1). Several wild animals, including fish, amphibians, waterfowls, terrestrial mammals, and various aquatic invertebrates have been reported as potential reservoirs of zoonotic Aeromonas spp. [8,9,10,11,12,13]. However, research on their occurrence in wild aquatic or semi-aquatic mammals is relatively scarce.
Although little is known about the microbial flora of nutria, these species have aquatic habitats in both freshwater and marine environments and in fact, several bacterial species normally found in fresh and seawater including Aeromonas spp. (e.g., A. veronii) have been isolated from frozen and fresh nutria carcasses processed in the USA [46]. Moreover, A. hydrophila has been identified as the cause of death in reared nutrias in German nutria farms [49]. Additionally, several Aeromonas spp. have been reported as bacterial flora that can cause opportunistic infections in other semi-aquatic mammals, such as the Canadian beaver (Castor canadensis) [50] and Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra) [47]. In this study, we isolated several Aeromonas species that are known to cause human infections from wild nutria in Korea, and especially, A. hydrophila was isolated from all swab sample types (rectal and nasal cavities and external wounds). Based on these results, Aeromonas spp. could be considered as bacterial flora of wild nutria, similar to other semi-aquatic mammals, and are a potential reservoir of pathogenic Aeromonas spp. that can cause opportunistic zoonotic infections in livestock and humans.
Next, we investigated the presence of 13 virulence-related genes in the 14 Aeromonas isolates (Table 2 and Figure S1). Overall, A. hydrophila and A. dhakensis were found to be more virulent than the two other Aeromonas spp. in our study. The most prevalent virulence genes were ast (14/14), flaA (14/14), and alt (13/14), whereas aexT (3/14) was the least prevalent. Genes encoding the type 3 secretion system (ascV), bundle-forming pilus (BfpA and BfpG), and Shiga-like toxin (stx-1 and stx-2) were not detected in any strain. Exotoxins, including cytotoxic heat-labile enterotoxin (act) [51], cytotonic heat-labile enterotoxin (alt) [52], and cytotonic heat-stable enterotoxin (ast) [53], are major virulence factors of Aeromonas spp. In this study, ten strains (9 A. hydrophila and 1 A. dhakensis) encoded all three enterotoxins, and A. caviae and the other one A. hydrophila strains possessed alt and ast genes. The detection of multiple enterotoxin genes, which are significantly associated with gastroenteritis and diarrheal disease [54], may imply that these Aeromonas strains can affect humans as an enteropathogen. Moreover, the high prevalence of flaA, which is involved in lateral flagella production and biofilm formation in Aeromonas [55], in our isolates strongly suggests that they would be able form biofilms in animals and humans. Biofilm formation is associated with difficult-to-treat persistent infection and chronic inflammation [56]. The strain KN-Mc-11N1, which was previously reported as A. rivipollensis [57], possessed the least number of virulence genes among the Aeromonas strains examined in this study.

3.2. Wild Nutria Is a Potential Reservoir of Antimicrobial-Resistant Aeromonas spp.

The significance of antibiotic-resistant Aeromonas spp. in disease outbreaks in aquaculture has been relatively well investigated because of the emergence of resistance to commercial antibiotics, such as tetracyclines and quinolones [17,18,19]. However, the intrinsic resistance of non-aquaculture-originated pathogenic aeromonads against β-lactam antibiotics such as cephalosporines and carbapenems remains a great concern because of the potential public health risk [20,21]. Therexfore, we investigated the resistance phenotypes of the 14 Aeromonas isolates to several antibiotic classes and were attempted to uncover the genetic determinants. Antimicrobial susceptibility was evaluated by the disc diffusion method (Table 3) and MIC determination (Table 4). According to the results of the disc diffusion assay, most isolates were not resistant to monobactams, aminoglycosides, tetracyclines, fluoroquinolones, folate pathway inhibitors, and phenicols. We did detect isolates resistant to β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, and first- and second-generation cephalosporins and carbapenems. Only A. hydrophila strains KN-Mc-5R1 and KN-Mc-6U22 showed resistance to monobactam (aztreonam) and fluoroquinolone (levofloxacin), respectively. Interestingly, A. hydrophila strains KN-Mc-4N1 and KN-Mc-5R1 were resistant to ceftazidime, a third-generation cephalosporin (Table 3). Third-generation cephalosporins have demonstrated excellent antimicrobial activity against Aeromonas species in clinical infections [58,59,60,61]; however, the emergence of resistance against those antibiotics in human isolates has been recently reported [62].
Unexpectedly, regardless of the low rates, the emergence of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant zoonotic bacteria has been recorded in terrestrial wild animals from Italy [63] and the USA [64]. Aeromonas is not the exception, and actually, third-generation cephalosporin-resistance was also recorded in some isolates from Eurasian otters in Portugal [65]. Similarly, two Aeromonas isolates in this study showed resistance to third-generation cephalosporin. These findings clearly indicate that environmental- or wild animal-originating Aeromonas spp. have already acquired resistance to these antibiotics and might pose a serious public health risk in different regions including Korea. Moreover, all A. hydrophila strains, except strain KN-Mc-6U2, were completely or intermediately resistant to imipenem, one of the carbapenems that are selectively used as last-resort antibiotics in humans, and particularly, A. dhakensis strain KN-Mc-6U21 was strongly resistant to both imipenem and meropenem (Table 3 and Table 4). Overall, A. hydrophila and A. dhakensis were more resistant to β-lactam antibiotics than the other Aeromonas species investigated in this study, and most strains were multi-drug resistant.
The occurrence of antibiotic-resistance genes associated with tetracycline, quinolone, β-lactam, cephalosporin, and carbapenem resistance, as well as class 1 integrons, in all 14 Aeromonas isolates was investigated by PCR and no positive amplicons were detected in this study. Although some A. hydrophila strains (KN-Mc-4N1 and KN-Mc-5R1) were phenotypically resistant to third-generation cephalosporin, we were not able to detect several chromosome- and plasmid-mediated extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL)-related genetic determinants, which are mainly disseminated in livestock and humans [66]. Several studies have reported that Aeromonas spp. are uniformly and intrinsically resistant to β-lactam antibiotics due to the production of multiple inducible, chromosomally-encoded β-lactamases [67,68]. Based on these results, we assume that the third-generation cephalosporin resistance of our isolates might be associated with another unveiled chromosomal AmpC β-lactamase in Aeromonas, which can hydrolyze third-generation cephalosporins, and further studies are warranted in our future analysis.
The cphA gene, related to carbapenem resistance [28], was detected in 11 out of 14 isolates (78.5%), but it was not detected in A. caviae and A. rivipollensis. Carbapenem resistance due to CphA, encoded by cphA, is known to be prevalent, but species-related in Aeromonas [69]. To date, the cphA gene has been found in A. dhakensis, A. hydrophila, A. veronii, A. jandaei, and A. salmonicida, but not in A. caviae [70,71]. In accordance with these previous reports, none of our A. caviae isolates (KN-Mc-1R3 and KN-Mc-3R1) showed phenotypical resistance to carbapenems or possessed the cphA gene. One of the cphA-encoding A. hydrophila isolates, KN-Mc-6U2, also did not show phenotypical resistance to carbapenems. The cphA genes of the 11 isolates showed 96–98% identity to the reported A. hydrophila cphA gene (X57102). Deduced amino acid sequences were phylogenetically analyzed in comparison with eight representative cphA variants found in Aeromonadaceae available from GenBank. The phylogenetic tree revealed two major groups (Figure 2). The cphA genes of all A. hydrophila isolates were clustered together with the cphA genes from other A. hydrophila strains (cphA, X57102; cphA2, U60294; cphA5, KP771880). The nucleotide sequence of cphA of A. dhakensis KN-Mc-6U21 was very similar (97.0%) to that of the type strain A. dhakensis MDC67T (AB765398), and interestingly, was clustered with the A. hydrophila cphA genes, different from those of the other Aeromonas species. Unlike the carbapenem-resistant A. hydrophila isolates in this study and despite the high cphA sequence similarity, A. dhakensis KN-Mc-6U21 showed extended resistance to imipenem and meropenem. Based on these results, it can be assumed that the cphA genes of A. hydrophila and A. dhakensis are distinct from those of other Aeromonas species; however, given the limited number of A. dhakensis isolates in this study, further studies on the genetic characteristics and diversity related to phenotypical carbapenem resistance are needed.
A. dhakensis reportedly has caused fatal animal and human infections in Korea [72,73,74]; however, the emergence of carbapenem resistance had not been reported to date. In this study, we detected a virulent A. dhakensis isolate (act+/alt+/ast+) that was simultaneously resistant to imipenem (32 μg/mL) and meropenem (8 μg/ml). This finding suggest that wild nutrias in Korea can carry potential pathogenic Aeromonas spp. including A. dhakensis that can cause potential zoonotic infections and might lead to treatment failure when using carbapenems in humans. Nutrias are known as carriers of various zoonotic aquatic pathogens that can cause diseases in livestock and humans, and Aeromonas spp. can be considered one of these potential zoonotic pathogens based on our findings. Although wild nutria are regarded an alien invasive species in Korea and the Korean government has implemented a control and eradication program [75], additional measures to prevent contact with livestock and humans will have to be developed as wild nutria meat and byproducts are currently still improperly consumed in Korea.
In conclusion, the results of this study support earlier findings that wild nutria can serve as a reservoir of various zoonotic aquatic pathogens that can transmit diseases to livestock and humans. Several potential zoonotic Aeromonas strains that showed unexpected resistance to antibiotics used in human and veterinary medicine were isolated from wild nutria captured in Korea. The intrinsic carbapenem resistance gene, cphA, was identified in most isolates, and phylogenetic analysis revealed the presence of two major groups of the genetic determinants. These results indicate that wild nutrias in Korea are a potential reservoir of zoonotic and antibiotic-resistant Aeromonas spp. that can cause infection and treatment failure in humans. Thus, additional measures to prevent contact of these wild animals with livestock and humans will have to be developed.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/7/8/224/s1. Table S1. List of PCR primers used in this study. Table S2. Biochemical characterization of Aeromonas spp. isolated in this study. Figure S1. Gel electropherogram of virulence-related gene amplicons from the 14 Aeromonas isolates used in this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.-H.L. and J.H.K.; data curation, S.R.L. and D.-H.L.; formal analysis, D.-H.L. and J.H.K.; funding acquisition, D.-H.L. and J.H.K.; investigation, S.R.L., S.Y.P., H.Y.K., and J.H.K.; methodology, S.Y.P., H.Y.K., and J.E.H.; project administration, J.H.K.; resources, S.L., M.-S.L., and J.R.L.; supervision, J.H.K.; writing—original draft, S.R.L., S.Y.P., S.L., and J.H.K.; writing—review and editing, J.E.H., H.K.K., and J.H.K.

Funding

This research was supported by the KRIBB Research Initiative Program and grants from the Korea Environment Industry & Technology Institute [201800227001] funded by Ministry of Environment, and the Collaborative Genome Program of the Korea Institute of Marine Science and Technology Promotion [20180430] funded by the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries in Republic of Korea.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Colwell, R.R.; MacDonell, M.T.; De Ley, J. Proposal to recognize the family Aeromonadaceae fam. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 1986, 36, 473–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Janda, J.M.; Abbott, S.L. The genus Aeromonas: taxonomy, pathogenicity, and infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2010, 23, 35–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Igbinosa, I.H.; Igumbor, E.U.; Aghdasi, F.; Tom, M.; Okoh, A.I. Emerging Aeromonas species infections and their significance in public health. Sci. World J. 2012, 2012, 625023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Piotrowska, M.; Przygodzińska, D.; Matyjewicz, K.; Popowska, M. Occurrence and variety of β-lactamase genes among Aeromonas spp. isolated from urban wastewater treatment plant. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Khajanchi, B.K.; Fadl, A.A.; Borchardt, M.A.; Berg, R.L.; Horneman, A.J.; Stemper, M.E.; Joseph, S.W.; Moyer, N.P.; Sha, J.; Chopra, A.K. Distribution of virulence factors and molecular fingerprinting of Aeromonas species isolates from water and clinical samples: suggestive evidence of water-to-human transmission. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 2313–2325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Janda, J.M. Recent advances in the study of the taxonomy, pathogenicity, and infectious syndromes associated with the genus Aeromonas. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1991, 4, 397–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chen, P.L.; Lamy, B.; Ko, W.C. Aeromonas dhakensis, an increasingly recognized human pathogen. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ceylan, E.; Berktas, M.; Ağaoğlu, Z. The occurrence and antibiotic resistance of motile Aeromonas in livestock. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2009, 41, 199–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gowda, T.K.; Reddy, V.R.; Devleesschauwer, B.; Zade, N.N.; Chaudhari, S.P.; Khan, W.A.; Shinde, S.V.; Patil, A.R. Isolation and seroprevalence of Aeromonas spp. among common food animals slaughtered in Nagpur, Central India. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2015, 12, 626–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dias, C.; Borges, A.; Saavedra, M.J.; Simões, M. Biofilm formation and multidrug resistant Aeromonas spp. from wild animals. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2018, 12, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jindal, N.; Garg, S.R.; Kumar, A. Comparison of Aeromonas spp. isolated from human, livestock and poultry faeces. Israel J. Vet. Med. 1993, 48, 80. [Google Scholar]
  12. Dias, C.; Serra, C.R.; Simões, L.C.; Simões, M.; Martinez-Murcia, A.; Saavedra, M.J. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase and carbapenemase-producing Aeromonas species in wild animals from Portugal. Vet. Rec. 2014, 174, 532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Laviad-Shitrit, S.; Izhaki, I.; Arakawa, E.; Halpern, M. Wild waterfowl as potential vectors of Vibrio cholerae and Aeromonas species. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2018, 23, 758–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Parker, J.L.; Shaw, J.G. Aeromonas spp. clinical microbiology and disease. J. Infect. 2011, 62, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Aravena-Román, M.; Inglis, T.J.; Henderson, B.; Riley, T.V.; Chang, B.J. Distribution of 13 virulence genes among clinical and environmental Aeromonas spp. in Western Australia. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2014, 33, 1889–1895. [Google Scholar]
  16. Figueira, V.; Vaz-Moreira, I.; Silva, M.; Manaia, C.M. Diversity and antibiotic resistance of Aeromonas spp. in drinking and waste water treatment plants. Water Res. 2011, 45, 5599–5611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Skwor, T.; Shinko, J.; Augustyniak, A.; Gee, C.; Andraso, G. Aeromonas hydrophila and Aeromonas veronii predominate among potentially pathogenic ciprofloxacin- and tetracycline-resistant Aeromonas isolates from Lake Erie. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 841–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Giraud, E.; Blanc, G.; Bouju-Albert, A.; Weill, F.X.; Donnay-Moreno, C. Mechanisms of quinolone resistance and clonal relationship among Aeromonas salmonicida strains isolated from reared fish with furunculosis. J. Med. Microbiol. 2004, 53, 895–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kim, J.H.; Hwang, S.Y.; Son, J.S.; Han, J.E.; Jun, J.W.; Shin, S.P.; Choresca, C., Jr.; Choi, Y.J.; Park, Y.H.; Park, S.C. Molecular characterization of tetracycline- and quinolone-resistant Aeromonas salmonicida isolated in Korea. J. Vet. Sci. 2011, 12, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, P.L.; Ko, W.C.; Wu, C.J. Complexity of β-lactamases among clinical Aeromonas isolates and its clinical implications. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2012, 45, 398–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fosse, T.; Giraud-Morin, C.; Madinier, I. Phénotypes de résistance aux β-lactamines dans le genre Aeromonas β-lactam-resistance phenotypes in the genus Aeromonas. Pathol. Biol. 2003, 51, 290–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Girlich, D.; Poirel, L.; Nordmann, P. Diversity of clavulanic acid-inhibited extended-spectrum β-lactamases in Aeromonas spp. from the Seine River, Paris, France. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 55, 1256–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Walsh, T.R.; Neville, W.A.; Haran, M.H.; Tolson, D.; Payne, D.J.; Bateson, J.H.; MacGowan, A.P.; Bennett, P.M. Nucleotide and amino acid sequences of the metallo-β-lactamase, ImiS, from Aeromonas veronii bv. sobria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1998, 42, 436–439. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Niumsup, P.; Simm, A.M.; Nurmahomed, K.; Walsh, T.R.; Bennett, P.M.; Avison, M.B. Genetic linkage of the penicillinase gene, amp, and blrAB, encoding the regulator of beta-lactamase expression in Aeromonas spp. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2003, 51, 1351–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Alksne, L.E.; Rasmussen, B.A. Expression of the AsbA1, OXA-12, and AsbM1 beta-lactamases in Aeromonas jandaei AER 14 is coordinated by a two-component regulon. J. Bacteriol. 1997, 179, 2006–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Neuwirth, C.; Siebor, E.; Robin, F.; Bonnet, R. First occurrence of an IMP metallo-β-lactamase in Aeromonas caviae: IMP-19 in an isolate from France. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007, 51, 4486–4488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Libisch, B.; Giske, C.G.; Kovács, B.; Tóth, T.G.; Füzi, M. Identification of the first VIM metallo-beta-lactamase-producing multiresistant Aeromonas hydrophila strain. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008, 46, 1878–1880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Massidda, O.; Rossolini, G.M.; Satta, G. The Aeromonas hydrophila cphA gene: molecular heterogeneity among class B metallo-β-lactamases. J. Bacteriol. 1991, 173, 4611–4617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lupo, A.; Coyne, S.; Berendonk, T.U. Origin and evolution of antibiotic resistance: the common mechanisms of emergence and spread in water bodies. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Patel, G.; Bonomo, R.A. ‘‘Stormy waters ahead’’: global emergence of carbapenemases. Front. Microbiol. 2013, 4, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kopf, R.K.; Nimmo, D.G.; Humphries, P.; Baumgartner, L.J.; Bode, M.; Bond, N.R.; Byrom, A.E.; Cucherousset, J.; Keller, R.P.; King, A.J.; et al. Confronting the risks of large-scale invasive species control. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2017, 1, 172–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Lowe, S.; Browne, M.; Boudjelas, S.; De Poorter, M. 100 of the World’s Worst Invasive Alien Species. A Selection from the Global Invasive Species Database; The World Conservation Union (IUCN): Gland, Switzerland, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hong, S.; Do, Y.; Kim, J.Y.; Kim, D.; Joo, G. Distribution, spread and habitat preferences of nutria (Myocastor coypus) invading the lower Nakdong River, South Korea. Biol. Invasions 2015, 17, 1485–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bertolino, S.; Genovesi, P. Semiaquatic mammals introduced into Italy: case studies in biological invasion. In Biological Invaders in Inland Waters: Profiles, Distribution, and Threats; Gherardi, F., Ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2007; pp. 175–191. [Google Scholar]
  35. Lee, D.H.; Lee, M.S.; Kim, Y.C.; Kim, I.R.; Kim, H.K.; Jeong, D.G.; Lee, J.R.; Kim, J.H. Complete mitochondrial genome of the invasive semi-aquatic mammal, nutria Myocastor coypus (Rodentia; Myocastoridae). Conserv. Genet. Resour. 2018, 10, 613–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Martino, P.E.; Stanchi, N.O.; Silvestrini, M.; Brihuega, B.; Samartino, L.; Parrado, E. Seroprevalence for selected pathogens of zoonotic importance in wild nutria (Myocastor coypus). Eur. J. Wildl. 2014, 60, 551–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bollo, E.; Pregel, P.; Gennero, S.; Pizzoni, E.; Rosati, S.; Nebbia, P.; Biolatti, B. Health status of a population of nutria (Myocastor coypus) living in a protected area in Italy. Res. Vet. Sci. 2003, 75, 21–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zanzani, S.A.; Cerbo, A.D.; Gazzonis, A.L.; Epis, S.; Invernizzi, A.; Tagliabue, S.; Manfredi, M.T. Parasitic and bacterial infections of Myocastor coypus in a metropolitan area of northwestern Italy. J. Wildl. Dis. 2016, 52, 126–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Yanez, M.A.; Catalán, V.; Apraiz, D.; Figueras, M.J.; Martinez-Murcia, A.J. Phylogenetic analysis of members of the genus Aeromonas based on gyrB gene sequences. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2003, 53, 875–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Korczak, B.; Christensen, H.; Emler, S.; Frey, J.; Kuhnert, P. Phylogeny of the family Pasteurellaceae based on rpoB sequences. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2004, 54, 1393–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Larkin, M.A.; Blackshields, G.; Brown, N.P.; Chenna, R.; McGettigan, P.A.; McWilliam, H.; Valentin, F.; Wallace, I.M.; Wilm, A.; Lopez, R.; et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 2947–2948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  43. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for Antimicrobial Dilution and Disk Susceptibility Testing of Infrequently Isolated or Fastidious Bacteria; Approved Guideline M45-A CLSI; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  45. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for Antimicrobial Dilution and Disk Susceptibility Testing of Infrequently Isolated or Fastidious Bacteria-Third Edition; Approved Guideline M45, 3rd ed.; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  46. Lyon, W.J.; Milliet, J.B. Microbial flora associated with Louisiana processed frozen and fresh nutria (Myocastor coypus) carcasses. J. Food Sci. 2000, 65, 1041–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Oliveira, M.; Sales-Luís, T.; Duarte, A.; Nunes, S.F.; Carneiro, C.; Tenreiro, T.; Tenreiro, R.; Santos-Reis, M.; Tavares, L.; Vilela, C.L. First assessment of microbial diversity in faecal microflora of Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra Linnaeus, 1758) in Portugal. Eur. J. Wildl. 2008, 54, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Navarro, A.; Martínez-Murcia, A. Phylogenetic analyses of the genus Aeromonas based on housekeeping gene sequencing and its influence on systematics. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 125, 622–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Köhler, B.; Wendland, B.; Winkler, M.; Kunter, E.; Horn, G. Occurrence of bacterial infectious diseases in coypu. 3. Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, Aeromonas and Actinobacillus infections. Arch. Exp. Veterinarmed. 1988, 42, 877–889. [Google Scholar]
  50. Cullen, C.L. Normal ocular features, conjunctival microflora and intraocular pressure in the Canadian beaver (Castor canadensis). Vet. Ophthalmol. 2003, 6, 279–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Chopra, A.K.; Houston, C.W.; Peterson, J.W.; Jin, J.F. Cloning, expression, and sequence analysis of a cytolytic enterotoxin gene from Aeromonas hydrophila. Can. J. Microbiol. 1993, 39, 513–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sha, J.; Kozlova, E.V.; Chopra, A.K. Role of various enterotoxins in Aeromonas hydrophila-induced gastroenteritis: Generation of enterotoxin gene-deficient mutants and evaluation of their enterotoxin activity. Infect. Immun. 2002, 70, 1924–1935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chopra, A.K.; Pham, R.; Houston, C.W. Cloning and expression of putative cytotonic enterotoxin-encoding genes from Aeromonas hydrophila. Gene 1994, 139, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Albert, M.J.; Ansaruzzaman, M.; Talukder, K.A.; Chopra, A.K.; Kuhn, I.; Rahman, M.; Faruque, A.S.; Islam, M.S.; Sack, R.B.; Mollby, R. Prevalence of enterotoxin genes in Aeromonas spp. isolated from children with diarrhea, healthy controls, and the environment. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2000, 38, 3785–3790. [Google Scholar]
  55. Kirov, S.M.; Castrisios, M.; Shaw, J.G. Aeromonas flagella (polar and lateral) are enterocyte adhesins that contribute to biofilm formation on surfaces. Infect. Immun. 2004, 72, 1939–1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Chen, L.; Wen, Y.M. The role of bacterial biofilm in persistent infections and control strategies. Int. J. Oral Sci. 2011, 3, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Park, S.Y.; Lim, S.R.; Son, J.S.; Kim, H.K.; Yoon, S.W.; Jeong, D.G.; Lee, M.; Lee, J.R.; Lee, D.; Kim, J.H. Complete genome sequence of Aeromonas rivipollensis KN-Mc-11N1, isolated from a wild nutria (Myocastor coypus) in South Korea. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2018, 7, e00907–e00918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Li, F.; Wang, W.; Zhu, Z.; Chen, A.; Du, P.; Wang, R.; Chen, H.; Hu, Y.; Li, J.; Kan, B.; et al. Distribution, virulence-associated genes and antimicrobial resistance of Aeromonas isolates from diarrheal patients and water, China. J. Inf. Secur. 2015, 70, 600–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Vila, J.; Marco, F.; Soler, L.; Chacon, M.; Figueras, M.J. In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of clinical isolates of Aeromonas caviae, Aeromonas hydrophila and Aeromonas veronii biotype sobria. J Antimicrob. Chemother. 2002, 49, 701–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tena, D.; Gonzalez-Praetorius, A.; Gimeno, C.; Pérez-Pomata, M.T.; Bisquert, J. Extraintestinal infection due to Aeromonas spp.: review of 38 cases. Enferm. Infecc. Microbiol. Clin. 2007, 25, 235–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ghenghesh, K.S.; Rahouma, A.; Zorgani, A.; Tawil, K.; Al Tomi, A.; Franka, E. Aeromonas in Arab countries: 1995–2014. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2015, 42, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhou, Y.; Yu, L.; Nan, Z.; Zhang, P.; Kan, B.; Yan, D.; Su, J. Taxonomy, virulence genes and antimicrobial resistance of Aeromonas isolated from extra-intestinal and intestinal infections. BMC Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zottola, T.; Montagnaro, S.; Magnapera, C.; Sasso, S.; De Martino, L.; Bragagnolo, A.; D’Amici, L.; Condoleo, R.; Pisanelli, G.; Iovane, G.; et al. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella in European wild boar (Sus scrofa); Latium Region–Italy. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2013, 36, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Jijón, S.; Wetzel, A.; LeJeune, J. Salmonella enterica isolated from wildlife at two Ohio rehabilitation centers. J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 2007, 38, 409–414. [Google Scholar]
  65. Oliveira, M.; Sales-Luís, T.; Semedo-Lemsaddek, T.; Ribeiro, T.; Pedroso, N.M.; Tavares, L.; Vilela, C.L. Antimicrobial resistant Aeromonas isolated from Eurasian Otters (Lutra lutra Linnaeus, 1758) in Portugal. In Perspectives in animal ecology and reproduction, 2nd ed.; Verma, A.K., Singh, G.D., Eds.; Daya Publishing House: Delhi, India, 2010; Volume 6, pp. 123–144. [Google Scholar]
  66. De Been, M.; Lanza, V.F.; de Toro, M.; Scharringa, J.; Dohmen, W.; Du, Y.; Hu, J.; Lei, Y.; Li, N.; Tooming-Klunderud, A.; et al. Dissemination of cephalosporin resistance genes between Escherichia coli strains from farm animals and humans by specific plasmid lineages. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10, e1004776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Goñi-Urriza, M.; Pineau, L.; Capdepuy, M.; Roques, C.; Caumette, P.; Quentin, C. Antimicrobial resistance of mesophilic Aeromonas spp. isolated from two European rivers. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2000, 46, 297–301. [Google Scholar]
  68. Penders, J.; Stobberingh, E.E. Antibiotic resistance of motile aeromonads in indoor catfish and eel farms in the southern part of The Netherlands. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2008, 31, 261–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Wu, C.J.; Chen, P.L.; Wu, J.J.; Yan, J.J.; Lee, C.C.; Lee, H.C.; Lee, N.Y.; Chang, C.M.; Lin, Y.T.; Chiu, Y.C.; et al. Distribution and phenotypic and genotypic detection of a metallo-β-lactamase, CphA, among bacteraemic Aeromonas isolates. J. Med. Microbiol. 2012, 61, 712–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Rossolini, G.M.; Zanchi, A.; Chiesurin, A.; Amicosante, G.; Satta, G.; Guglielmetti, P. Distribution of cphA or related carbapenemase-encoding genes and production of carbapenemase activity in members of the genus Aeromonas. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1995, 39, 346–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sinclair, H.A.; Heney, C.; Sidjabat, H.E.; George, N.M.; Bergh, H.; Anuj, S.N.; Nimmo, G.R.; Paterson, D.L. Genotypic and phenotypic identification of Aeromonas species and CphA-mediated carbapenem resistance in Queensland, Australia. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2016, 85, 98–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yi, S.W.; You, M.J.; Cho, H.S.; Lee, C.S.; Kwon, J.K.; Shin, G.W. Molecular characterization of Aeromonas species isolated from farmed eels (Anguilla japonica). Vet. Microbiol. 2013, 164, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Yi, S.W.; Chung, T.H.; Joh, S.J.; Park, C.; Park, B.Y.; Shin, G.W. High prevalence of blaCTX-M group genes in Aeromonas dhakensis isolated from aquaculture fish species in South Korea. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2014, 14, 0274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Shin, G.W.; You, M.J.; Cho, H.S.; Yi, S.W.; Lee, C.S. Severe sepsis due to Aeromonas aquariorum in a patient with liver cirrhosis. Jpn. J. Infect. Dis. 2013, 66, 519–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Jo, Y.S.; Derbridge, J.J.; Baccus, J.T. History and current status of invasive nutria and common muskrat in Korea. Wetlands 2017, 37, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Microorganisms 07 00224 g001 550
Figure 1. Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree based on gyrB nucleotide sequences showing the relationships of all Aeromonas isolates reported in this study to some representative type strains of Aeromonas spp. and the outgroup Vibrio cholerae CECT 514T. The scale bar represents 0.05 nucleotide substitutions per site.
Figure 1. Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree based on gyrB nucleotide sequences showing the relationships of all Aeromonas isolates reported in this study to some representative type strains of Aeromonas spp. and the outgroup Vibrio cholerae CECT 514T. The scale bar represents 0.05 nucleotide substitutions per site.
Microorganisms 07 00224 g001
Microorganisms 07 00224 g002 550
Figure 2. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on cphA amino acid sequences showing the relationships of the deduced amino acid sequences of 11 cphA genes reported in this study to eight representative cphA variants in Aeromonadaceae. The scale bar represents 0.01 amino acid substitutions per site.
Figure 2. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on cphA amino acid sequences showing the relationships of the deduced amino acid sequences of 11 cphA genes reported in this study to eight representative cphA variants in Aeromonadaceae. The scale bar represents 0.01 amino acid substitutions per site.
Microorganisms 07 00224 g002
Table
Table 1. Aeromonas isolates identified in this study.
Table 1. Aeromonas isolates identified in this study.
No.Bacterial StrainsHemolysisIsolated YearSourceDeposition Number **
1Aeromonas hydrophila KN-Mc-1R1β2016Rectal cavityKCCM 90327
2Aeromonas hydrophila KN-Mc-1R2 *β2016Rectal cavityKCCM 90286
3Aeromonas cavieae KN-Mc-1R3β2016Rectal cavityKCCM 90328
4Aeromonas hydrophila KN-Mc-2R1β2016Rectal cavityKCCM 90329
5Aeromonas cavieae KN-Mc-3R1β2016Rectal cavityKCCM 90330
6Aeromonas hydrophila KN-Mc-4N1β2016Nasal cavityKCCM 90331
7Aeromonas hydrophila KN-Mc-4N3β2016Nasal cavityKCCM 90332
8Aeromonas hydrophila KN-Mc-5R1β2016Rectal cavityKCCM 90333
9Aeromonas hydrophila KN-Mc-5R2β2016Rectal cavityKCCM 90334
10Aeromonas hydrophila KN-Mc-6U2β2016External woundKCCM 90335
11Aeromonas dhakensis KN-Mc-6U21 *β2016External woundKCCM 90283
12Aeromonas hydrophila KN-Mc-6U22β2016External woundKCCM 90336
13Aeromonas hydrophila KN-Mc-10N1β2017Nasal cavityKCCM 90337
14Aeromonas rivipollensis KN-Mc-11N1 *β2017Nasal cavityKCCM 90285
15Aeromonas hydrophila ATCC 7966–––
* The genomes of strains KN-Mc-1R2, KN-Mc-6U21, and KN-Mc-11N1 have been deposited in GenBank under accession nos. CP027804.1, CP023141.1, and CP027856.1, respectively. ** KCCM, Korean Culture Center of Microorganisms.
Table
Table 2. Presence of the virulence-related genes of 14 Aeromonas strains.
Table 2. Presence of the virulence-related genes of 14 Aeromonas strains.
StrainsVirulence-Related Genes
actaspAaltastaexTascVvasHlafAflaABfpABfpGstx-1stx-2
KN-Mc-1R1++++−−+++−−−−
KN-Mc-1R2++++−−+++−−−−
KN-Mc-1R3−−++−−+++−−−−
KN-Mc-2R1−++++−+++−−−−
KN-Mc-3R1−−++−−−++−−−−
KN-Mc-4N1++++−−+++−−−−
KN-Mc-4N3++++−−+++−−−−
KN-Mc-5R1++++−−+++−−−−
KN-Mc-5R2++++−−+++−−−−
KN-Mc-6U2++++−−+−+−−−−
KN-Mc-6U21+−+++−+−+−−−−
KN-Mc-6U22++++−−+−+−−−−
KN-Mc-10N1++++−−+++−−−−
KN-Mc-11N1−−−++−−−+−−−−
Table
Table 3. Antibiotic resistance profile of the 14 Aeromonas isolates as determined by disk diffusion testing.
Table 3. Antibiotic resistance profile of the 14 Aeromonas isolates as determined by disk diffusion testing.
StrainsAntimicrobial agent [disk content (μg)]
β-lactamsCephCarbMoAmTetFqFP
SAM
(20)		AMC
(30)		TZP
(110)		KF
(30)		KZ
(30)		FOX
(30)		CXM
(30)		CAZ
(30)		CTX
(30)		FEP
(30)		IPM
(10)		MEM
(10)		ATM
(30)		AK
(30)		CN
(10)		TE
(30)		CIP
(5)		LEV
(5)		STX
(25)		C
(30)
KN-Mc-1R1
KN-Mc-1R2
KN-Mc-1R3
KN-Mc-2R1
KN-Mc-3R1
KN-Mc-4N1
KN-Mc-4N3
KN-Mc-5R1
KN-Mc-5R2
KN-Mc-6U2
KN-Mc-6U21
KN-Mc-6U22
KN-Mc-10N1
KN-Mc-11N1
A category of antibiotic susceptibility is dark gray, resistant; light gray, intermediate; white, susceptible. β-lactams, β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations; Ceph, Cephalosporins; Carb, Carbapenems; Mo, Monobactams; Am, Aminoglycosides; Tet, Tetracyclines; Fq, Fluoroquinolones; F, Folate pathway inhibitors; P, Phenicols. SAM, Ampicillin-Sulbactam; AMC, Amoxycillin-Clavulanic acid; TZP, Piperacillin-Tazobactam; KF, Cephalothin; KZ, Cephazolin; FOX, Cefoxitin; CXM, Cefuroxime; CAZ, Ceftazidime; CTX, Cefotaxime; FEP, Cefepime; IPM, Imipenem; MEM, Meropenem; ATM, Aztreonam; AK, Amikacin; CN, Gentamicin; TE, Tetracycline; CIP, Ciprofloxacin; LEV, Levofloxacin; STX, Trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole; C, Chloramphenicol.
Table
Table 4. MICs of six selected antimicrobial agents for the 14 Aeromonas isolates.
Table 4. MICs of six selected antimicrobial agents for the 14 Aeromonas isolates.
StrainsAntimicrobial Agent (MIC (μg/mL))
β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor CombinationsCephalo-SporinsCarbapenems
AMAMCAMPCTXIPMMEM
KN-Mc-1R1128 (R)16 (I)>256 (R)0.122 (I)0.06
KN-Mc-1R2256 (R)64 (R)>256 (R)0.068 (R)1
KN-Mc-1R3128 (R)16 (I)>256 (R)0.250.50.015
KN-Mc-2R1>256 (R)32 (R)>256 (R)0.068 (R)0.5
KN-Mc-3R1128 (R)16 (I)>256 (R)0.120.50.03
KN-Mc-4N1128 (R)16 (I)>256 (R)0.122 (I)0.12
KN-Mc-4N364 (R)32 (R)>256 (R)0.062 (I)0.12
KN-Mc-5R1256 (R)32 (R)>256 (R)0.128 (R)0.25
KN-Mc-5R2256 (R)32 (R)>256 (R)0.064 (R)0.03
KN-Mc-6U264 (R)16 (I)>256 (R)0.060.50.03
KN-Mc-6U21128 (R)16 (I)>256 (R)0.532 (R)8 (R)
KN-Mc-6U2232 (R)16 (I)>256 (R)0.062 (I)0.06
KN-Mc-10N164 (R)16 (I)>256 (R)0.064 (R)0.06
KN-Mc-11N1128 (R)32 (R)>256 (R)0.250.120.03
R, resistant; I, intermediate. AM, Amoxycillin; AMC, Amoxycillin-Clavulanic acid; AMP, Ampicillin; CTX, Cefotaxime; IPM, Imipenem; MEM, Meropenem.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lim, S.R.; Lee, D.-H.; Park, S.Y.; Lee, S.; Kim, H.Y.; Lee, M.-S.; Lee, J.R.; Han, J.E.; Kim, H.K.; Kim, J.H. Wild Nutria (Myocastor coypus) Is a Potential Reservoir of Carbapenem-Resistant and Zoonotic Aeromonas spp. in Korea. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 224. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7080224

AMA Style

Lim SR, Lee D-H, Park SY, Lee S, Kim HY, Lee M-S, Lee JR, Han JE, Kim HK, Kim JH. Wild Nutria (Myocastor coypus) Is a Potential Reservoir of Carbapenem-Resistant and Zoonotic Aeromonas spp. in Korea. Microorganisms. 2019; 7(8):224. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7080224

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lim, Se Ra, Do-Hun Lee, Seon Young Park, Seungki Lee, Hyo Yeon Kim, Moo-Seung Lee, Jung Ro Lee, Jee Eun Han, Hye Kwon Kim, and Ji Hyung Kim. 2019. "Wild Nutria (Myocastor coypus) Is a Potential Reservoir of Carbapenem-Resistant and Zoonotic Aeromonas spp. in Korea" Microorganisms 7, no. 8: 224. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7080224

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop