Next Article in Journal
Indigenous Yeasts from Rose Oil Distillation Wastewater and Their Capacity for Biotransformation of Phenolics
Next Article in Special Issue
The AxBioTick Study: Borrelia Species and Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus in Ticks, and Clinical Responses in Tick-Bitten Individuals on the Aland Islands, Finland
Previous Article in Journal
Sphingomonas sediminicola Is an Endosymbiotic Bacterium Able to Induce the Formation of Root Nodules in Pea (Pisum sativum L.) and to Enhance Plant Biomass Production
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hyalomma spp. in Austria—The Tick, the Climate, the Diseases and the Risk for Humans and Animals
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Detection of Old and New World Relapsing Fever Borreliae in Ornithodoros Ticks Collected from Warthog Burrows in Zambia

1
Division of International Research Promotion, International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, North 20 West 10, Kita-ku, Sapporo 001-0020, Japan
2
Division of Molecular Pathobiology, International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, North 20 West 10, Kita-ku, Sapporo 001-0020, Japan
3
Virology Unit, Central Veterinary Research Institute, Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock, P.O. Box 33980, Lusaka 10101, Zambia
4
Department of Bacteriology-I, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Toyama 1-23-1, Shinjuku, Tokyo 162-8640, Japan
5
FQM Trident Wildlife and Forestry Programs, P.O. Box 230022, Kalumbila 10101, Zambia
6
Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH25 9RG, UK
7
Department of Diseases Control, School of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Zambia, P.O. Box 32379, Lusaka 10101, Zambia
8
Macha Research Trust, Macha 10101, Zambia
9
Division of Global Epidemiology, International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, North 20 West 10, Kita-ku, Sapporo 001-0020, Japan
10
Department of Paraclinical Studies, School of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Zambia, P.O. Box 32379, Lusaka 10101, Zambia
11
Laboratory of Parasitology, Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, North 18 West 9, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan
12
One Health Research Center, Hokkaido University, North 20 West 10, Kita-ku, Sapporo 001-0020, Japan
13
International Collaboration Unit, International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, North 20 West 10, Kita-ku, Sapporo 001-0020, Japan
14
Global Virus Network, 725 West Lombard St, Room S413, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
15
Institute for Vaccine Research and Development, Hokkaido University, North 21 West 11, Kita-Ku, Sapporo 001-0021, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Current address: Management Department of Biosafety, Laboratory Animal, and Pathogen Bank, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Toyama 1-23-1, Shinjuku, Tokyo 162-8640, Japan.
Concurrent address: Department of Virology-I, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Toyama 1-23-1, Shinjuku, Tokyo 162-8640, Japan.
§
Current address: Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Saiwai-cho 3-5-8, Fuchu, Tokyo 183-8509, Japan.
Microorganisms 2023, 11(1), 200; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010200
Submission received: 12 December 2022 / Revised: 9 January 2023 / Accepted: 10 January 2023 / Published: 12 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Ticks and Tick-Borne Pathogens)

Abstract

:
Relapsing fever (RF) is an arthropod-borne disease caused by Borrelia spirochete, which is one of the major public health concerns in endemic regions including Africa. However, information on Borrelia spirochetes is limited in Zambia. Here, we investigate the Borrelia spirochetes harbored by Ornithodoros ticks in Zambian National Parks. We analyzed 182 DNA samples pooled from 886 Ornithodoros ticks. Of these, 43 tested positive, and their sequence revealed that the ticks harbored both Old and New World RF borreliae. This research presents the first evidence of Old-World RF borreliae in Zambia. The New World RF borreliae detected herein differed from the Candidatus Borrelia fainii previously reported in Zambia and were closely related to the pathogenic Borrelia sp. VS4 identified in Tanzania. Additionally, Borrelia theileri was recently reported in Zambia. Hence, at least four different Borrelia species occur in Zambia, and the organisms causing relapsing fever there might be more complex than previously thought. We empirically confirmed that real-time PCR with TaqMan minor groove binder probes accurately and simultaneously detected both Old and New World RF. In this manner, they could facilitate quantitative analyses of both types of RF borreliae. Subsequent investigations should endeavor to isolate the aforementioned Borrelia spp. and perform serosurveys on patients with RF.

1. Introduction

The vector-borne spirochetes of the family Borreliaceae currently comprise 42 named species [1]. Their natural transmission cycle is maintained between vertebrate reservoir hosts such as rodents and humans and vector arthropods such as ticks and lice. The Borrelia phylogenetic groups include Lyme disease (LD) borreliae, relapsing fever (RF) borreliae, monotreme-associated borreliae, and reptile-associated borreliae [2,3,4]. LD borreliae, monotreme-associated borreliae, and reptile-associated borreliae are transmitted by Ixodid (hard-bodied) ticks. RF borreliae are transmitted mainly by lice and Argasid (soft-bodied) ticks [5]. RF borreliae are further categorized into Old World (Afrotropic-Palearctic Ecozones) RF borreliae, New World (Nearctic Ecozone) RF borreliae, and hard tick-borne RF borreliae. They are distinguished by their endemic regions and/or the genetic lineages of the causative agents [5,6].
Northern, central, and eastern African countries are endemic regions of Old World RF borreliae, such as Borrelia hispanica, B. duttonii, and B. crocidurae. Studies on Borrelia spirochetes have been conducted in Ethiopia, Mali, Morocco, Senegal, and Tanzania [7,8,9,10]. However, only two investigations of Borrelia spirochetes have been reported from Zambia, a country in southern Africa. We previously reported that Candidatus Borrelia fainii closely related to New World RF borreliae was isolated from a patient bitten by a tick in a cave in Zambia [11]. Candidatus B. fainii was also detected in Egyptian fruit bats (Rousettus aegyptiacus) and soft ticks (Reticulinasus (Ornithodoros) faini) collected from the cave [11]. We also reported that Borrelia theileri, the causative agent of bovine borreliosis transmitted by hard ticks, was detected in wild impalas and domestic cattle in the Kafue ecosystem in Zambia [12]. On the other hand, there has been no evidence of the presence of Old-World RF borreliae in Zambia to date, whereas Borrelia duttonii, which is a member of the Old-World RF borreliae, is endemic in Tanzania and the Democratic Republic of the Congo neighboring Zambia [10,13].
Relapsing fever is a major public health concern in several African countries. Countermeasures against RF are urgently needed. Many cases of infection involve both adults and children, and vertical transmission of the spirochetes during the perinatal period has been reported [14]. Moreover, RF is often misdiagnosed as malaria based on its clinical symptoms. Consequently, the appropriate therapy may not be administered in these cases [15]. Therefore, it is necessary to develop and distribute appropriate diagnostic systems for the detection of RF in Africa.
Relapsing fever pathogens have broad genetic diversity. Hence, laboratory diagnoses of RF in African countries require a testing system that can detect both Old World and New World RF borreliae. Countries in the Northern Hemisphere such as the United States represent the non-endemic area of Old-World RF borreliae. Researchers there have developed a modified TaqMan minor groove binder (MGB) probe-based real-time PCR system that detects New World and hard tick-borne RF borreliae [16]. Nevertheless, it is necessary to confirm that this methodology can also detect Old World RF borreliae before it is introduced to African countries.
In the present study, we detected and genetically characterized both Old and New World RF borreliae in the soft ticks that infested warthog burrows in Zambian national parks. We also verified a modified MGB probe-based real-time PCR system initially developed by Barbour et al. (2009) [16] for the simultaneous detection of Old and New World RF borreliae.

2. Materials and Methods

Tick collections in the national parks were approved by the Department of National Parks and Wildlife, Ministry of Tourism and Arts, Zambia (Permission No. DNPW/8/27/1) as previously described [17,18].
A total of 724 Ornithodoros moubata ticks were recovered from African warthog (Phacochoerus africanus) burrows and culverts in Mosi-oa-Tunya National Park (MTNP) in April 2019 (Figure 1). Another 75 and 87 O. porcinus ticks were collected from African warthog burrows and culverts in Kafue National Park (KNP) and South Luangwa National Park (SLNP), respectively, in December 2019 (Figure 1). Tick species were confirmed by morphological and molecular identification in the previous studies [17,18] before being pooled for DNA extraction. Each tick pool consisted of either two or three adult ticks or six to eight nymph ticks from the same infested burrow and culvert, but the feeding status and sex of the ticks were not considered. The DNA was extracted with a 100 μL elution buffer using DNeasy® Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. In total, 124 O. moubata and 24 and 34 O. porcinus DNA samples were obtained from MTNP, KNP, and SLNP, respectively. These samples have been used in previous studies on African swine fever and Rickettsia spp. [12,17,18].
All samples were screened for Borrelia spp. via nested-PCR of the flagellin gene (flaB) [3]. The first PCR was performed using the BflaPAD and BflaPDU primers and the nested-PCR using the BflaPCR and BflaPBU primers, which yielded 345 bp. The composition of the reaction mixture was the same for the first- and nested-PCRs, except that 1 μL of the first PCR product was added in place of 2 μL of template DNA in the nested-PCR. The 20 μL reaction mixture contained 0.1 μL Ex Taq HS (Takara Bio Inc., Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan), 2 μL of 10 × Ex Taq buffer, 1.6 μL of 2.5 mM deoxynucleotide triphosphate (dNTP) mixture, and 200 nM of each primer. The PCR conditions were as follows: 98°C for 1 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 50°C for 30 s, 72°C for 60 s, and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. The positive samples were used in the subsequent PCR with the BF1 and BR1 primers targeting Borrelia spp. 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) and amplifying approximately 1.3 kbp [19]. For further characterization, positive samples from the 16S rDNA PCR were used in the subsequent PCRs targeting the glycerophosphodiester-phosphodiesterase gene (glpQ) and the hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase gene (hpt). Two PCRs were conducted to obtain longer glpQ sequences and the first and second PCR sequences were assembled. As previously described, the glpQf1F + glpQf1R and the glpQf2F + glpQf2R primer sets were used to amplify fragments 1 (559 bp) and 2 (453 bp), respectively [20]. For hpt, the hptdegF and hptdegR primers were used to amplify 433 bp fragments [21]. The PCR conditions for 16S rDNA, glpQ, and hpt PCRs were the same as described above except for the annealing temperature (55°C). The sizes of all PCR products were checked by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis in Gel-Red™ (Biotium, Hayward, CA, USA) and visualized with a UV-transilluminator. The primers used in the PCRs are listed in Table S1.
NucleoSpin Gel and PCR clean-up kit (Takara Bio Inc., Kusatsu, Siga, Japan) or ExoSAP-IT™ Express PCR clean-up reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Auburn, AL, USA) were used to purify the PCR products. BigDye Terminator Chemistry v. 3.1 (Applied Biosystems Inc (ABI), Foster City, CA, USA) was used for cycle sequencing of all amplicons in both forward and reverse directions. The sequencing products were run on a 3130xl Genetic Analyzer (ABI) or a 3500 Genetic Analyzer (ABI) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The 5′ and 3′ ends of the sequences were trimmed with GENETYX v. 9.1 (GENETYX Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The sequences obtained herein were compared with those in public databases with BLASTn. Phylogenetic analysis was conducted with MEGA X [22], and ClustalW was used to align the sequences with those of closely related organisms deposited in the database (DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank). The maximum likelihood (ML) method and the Kimura-2 parameter model were used to generate phylogenetic trees based on each gene. The representative Borrelia spp. DNA sequences obtained in the present study are available in the GenBank database and their accession numbers are listed in Table S2 (Accession nos. LC741320- LC741337).
To verify MGB probe-based real-time PCR for simultaneous detection of different RF borreliae, multiplex real-time PCR was performed on the positive samples according to the method of Barbour et al. (2009) [16] with the modification of probes [23]. The real-time PCR conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 10 s followed by 45 cycles at 95 °C for 5 s and 60 °C for 35 s. Amplification was performed in an Applied Biosystems 7500 Real-Time PCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The 25 µL reaction mixture was prepared by adding 1 µM of each PCR primer (16SRT-F and 16SRT-R; Table S3) and 0.24 µM of each MGB probe (NWB_VIC_1794 and OWB_FAM_1795; Table S3) to Luna Universal probe qPCR Master Mix (New England Biolabs (NEB), Ipswich, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. MGB probes were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific. For the analysis of the PCR results, the threshold line was set to 0.2 to avoid detecting nonspecific fluorescence.
The plasmids pBDrrs and pBFrrs were used as control DNA sources to evaluate the copy number via 16S rRNA gene-based real-time PCR. Regions of the 16S rRNA gene of B. duttonii strain Ly and Ca. B. fainii strain Qtaro were amplified by PCR using 16SRT-F and 16SRT-R primer set (Table S3). The 70 bp DNA amplicons were independently cloned into the pCR4-TOPO plasmid vector (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The plasmid DNA was amplified in Escherichia coli strain DH5α (Nippon Gene, Tokyo, Japan), as previously described [24]. The aforementioned plasmids were purified using the PureYield Plasmid Miniprep System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The plasmid concentration was measured with NanoDrop Lite (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The plasmids containing partial 16S rDNA sequence of B. duttonii strain Ly and Ca. B. fainii strain Qtaro were labeled as pBDrrs and pBFrrs, respectively. Each plasmid was serially diluted and used as a control DNA source for the qPCR assay.

3. Results

3.1. Screening of Borrelia with flaB Nested-PCR

In total, 39 of the 124 O. moubata pools from MTNP and 4 of the 34 O. porcinus pools from SLNP showed positive by flaB nested-PCR. None of the samples from KNP was positive for flaB nested-PCR (Table 1). The total pool prevalence in Ornithodoros ticks was 23.6% (43/182). The pool prevalences were 31.6% (39/124) and 11.8% (4/34) in the O. moubata at MTNP and the O. porcinus at SLNP, respectively (Table 1).
The sequences from O. moubata pools had six variations labeled flaB_Types 1–6, and those from the O. porcinus pools had two variations labeled flaB_Types 1 and 7 (Table 2). The flaB_Type 1 sequences were obtained from the 30 O. moubata pools and the 3 O. porcinus pools. The flaB_Type 2, 4, 5, and 6 sequences were obtained from O. moubata pools (Sample IDs: MTNP-7, MTNP-32, MTNP-45, and MTNP-95). The flaB_Type 7 sequence was obtained from one O. porcinus pool (Sample ID: SLNP-19) (Table 2).
In the phylogenetic tree based on the partial flaB sequence, the flaB_Type 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7 sequences were clustered together with Borrelia sp. VS4 (accession No. AB057547) and located in the clade of the New World RF borreliae (Figure 2). The flaB_Type 4 sequence was clustered together with B. duttonii, which is a member of the Old-World RF borreliae (Figure 2).

3.2. Analysis of 16S Ribosomal DNA

The 16S rDNA sequences were obtained from 25 and 4 positive samples of O. moubata in MTNP and O. porcinus in SLNP, respectively (Table 3). There were seven sequence variants (16S_Type 1 to 7). The 16S_Type 1 sequence was obtained from 18 and 3 of O. moubata and O. porcinus pools, respectively. The 16S_Type 2–4 and 6 sequences were from O. moubata pools. The 16S_Type 7 sequence from O. porcinus pool. The 16S_Type 5 sequence from one O. moubata pool (Sample ID: MTNP-32) (Table 3).
In the phylogenetic tree based on the nearly full length of the 16S rDNA sequences, the sequences from all ticks in MTNP and SLNP except single MTNP-32 were clustered together with Borrelia sp. VS4 and located in the clade of the New-World RF borreliae (Figure 3). The sequence from MTNP-32 was located in the clade of the Old-World RF borreliae (Figure 3).

3.3. Analysis of glpQ and hpt Genes

The glpQ and hpt sequences were obtained exclusively from MTNP-32. For glpQ, the sequence showed 97.4% (818/840 bp) identity with B. crocidurae (accession No. JX292930). In the phylogenetic tree based on the partial glpQ sequence, the sequence from MTNP-32 clustered together with the Old-World RF borreliae (Figure 4a). However, the hpt sequence showed 95.1% (369/388 bp) identity with B. crocidurae DOU (accession No. CP004267) and B. duttonii Ly (accession No. CP000976). In the phylogenetic tree based on the partial hpt sequences, the sequence from MTNP-32 clustered together with the Old-World RF borreliae (Figure 4b).

3.4. Real-Time PCR

The 42 samples identified as positive for the flaB nested-PCR were used in the real-time PCR. Of these, 23 were also positive for the 16S rDNA PCR. Out of the 42 samples, 38 (90.5%) were positive for the real-time PCR (Figure 5). Four negative samples on real-time PCR were also negative for the 16S rDNA PCR. The Borrelia sp. from MTNP-32 was closely related to B. duttonii and was successfully detected only by the OWB_FAM_1795 probe designed for Old World RF borreliae. In contrast, the other 37 samples containing New World RF borrelia were detected only by the NWB_VIC_1794 probe designed for New World RF borreliae and B. miyamotoi. The Borrelia copy number was in the range of 4.3–5835 (Table S2). When flaB nested-PCR was set as the gold standard, the real-time PCR method used herein had 90.5% (38/42 samples) sensitivity and 100% (38/38 samples) specificity.

4. Discussion

In the present study, we investigated Borrelia spirochetes in soft ticks collected from African warthog burrows and culverts in three National Parks in Zambia. Two different Borrelia spp. harbored by Ornithodoros ticks were characterized by multiple genes and were found to belong to Old World and New World RF borreliae. We tested the sensitivity and specificity of a multiplex real-time PCR in detecting both Old World and New World RF borreliae with the newly designed probes. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to report Old World RF borreliae in Zambia.
Borrelia duttonii causes RF and is transmitted by Ornithodoros moubata complex ticks, such as O. moubata and O. porcinus in East African countries. In endemic areas in Tanzania, the rate of house infestation with O. moubata complex ticks is very high (up to 88%) [25]. RF caused by B. duttonii is one of the diseases with the highest fatality among children and pregnant women in endemic areas [26]. In the present study, a Borrelia sp. closely related to B. duttonii was detected in an O. moubata pool (MTNP-32) in MTNP. This Borrelia sp. showed high identity with B. duttonii on the 16S rDNA sequence. Its flaB, glpQ, and hpt sequences only showed 92.6 to 97.4% identity with those invalidated Borrelia species. Hence, it is difficult to conclude whether Borrelia sp., closely related to B. duttonii, is likely to be pathogenic to humans. Therefore, Borrelia sp. needs to be characterized in detail, and it is of interest to evaluate its pathogenicity in further research.
Here, New World RF borreliae were detected from O. moubata and O. porcinus ticks collected in MTNP and SLNP, respectively. Their flaB and 16S rDNA sequences were similar or identical to those of Borrelia sp. VS4. The latter was first detected in O. porcinus isolated in Mvumi, central Tanzania [27]. It was then found in the blood of a febrile child living in the aforementioned area [28]. Hence, these Borrelia spp. belonging to the New World RF borreliae might be pathogenic to humans. Only one case of human borreliosis has been reported in Zambia [11]; however, it was caused by Ca. B. fainii. Therefore, the agents of human borreliosis in Zambia might be more divergent. To reveal the actual situation of human borreliosis in Zambia, further investigations such as serological surveys and screening of Borrelia in patients with a fever of unknown origin are warranted.
In a study conducted in central Tanzania, the total prevalence of Borrelia spp. in O. porcinus was 50% (60/120), while the prevalences of B. duttonii and New World RF borrelia in the Ornithodoros ticks were 42.5% (51/120) and 7.5% (9/120), respectively [29]. In the present study, the total pool prevalence of Borrelia spp. in Ornithodoros ticks was 23.6% (43/182). Further, Borrelia sp. closely related to B. duttonii and New World RF borreliae in Ornithodoros ticks had a pool prevalence of 0.5% (1/182) and 23.1% (42/182), respectively. Since ticks were pooled in the present study, directly comparing the prevalence with that in central Tanzania would not be possible. Furthermore, in the previous study in central Tanzania, the tick specimens were collected in homes, and humans were considered the major hosts. By contrast, our tick specimens were collected from warthog burrows, and warthogs were considered the hosts. Therefore, to evaluate the risk of human borreliosis in Zambian national parks, further research is required to account for the usage of the parks and the prevalence of borrelia in ticks.
Mitani et al. (2004) attempted to isolate the New World RF borreliae designated Borrelia sp. VS4 from O. porcinus in Tanzania by using a BSK-II culture medium. However, the isolation was unsuccessful [29]. There have been several reports of New World RF borreliae in Africa and Eurasia. For instance, Ca. B. kalaharica was detected in a febrile patient returning from southern Africa in 2016 and in Ornithodoros savignyi ticks in Nigeria in 2018 [30,31,32]. The Ca. Borrelia fainii was detected in a febrile patient and cave habituating bats and soft ticks in Zambia, and it was also detected in bats in China [11,33,34]. Only our previous study successfully isolated Borrelia sp. belonging to New-World RF borreliae in the Old World [11]. Thus, the isolation of other New World RF borreliae distributed in the Old World, such as Borrelia sp. VS4 is strongly needed to better characterize this unique borrelia group.
Here, the glpQ sequence was obtained only from the Borrelia sp. from the MTNP-32 sample. This Borrelia sp. belonged to the Old-World RF borreliae. The same sample was positive by PCR targeting hpt. By contrast, all samples containing the New World RF borreliae were negative for both glpQ and hpt PCRs. Therefore, the current primer sets targeting glpQ and hpt might be unsuitable for use on the New World RF borreliae detected herein. Real-time PCR with modified probes successfully detected both Old and New World RF borreliae with high specificity. Ten copies per reaction were sufficient for the detection. Therefore, this method might be useful for quantitative analysis of Borrelia spirochete in regions where both Old and New World RF are endemic.
In the present study, we detected Borrelia sp. belonging to the New World RF borreliae, a species different from the ones previously reported in Zambia, from Ornithodoros ticks. We also detected Borrelia sp. closely related to B. duttonii from the ticks. To date, only two Borrelia species, namely, Ca. B. fainii and B. theileri, have been reported in Zambia [11,35].
To the best of our knowledge, at least four Borrelia species are currently present in Zambia. The causative agents of RF in Zambia might be more complex than previously thought. Further investigations, such as isolation of the detected Borrelia spp., nationwide surveillance of Borrelia spirochetes, and serological survey in humans, are required for a better understanding of the Borrelia spp. and public health in the country.

Supplementary Materials

The supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms11010200/s1, Table S1: The primers used for PCRs in the present study, Table S2: List of positive samples with the accession number and the real-time PCR results, Table S3: Oligonucleotides used for real-time PCR in the present study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Q. and H.K.; methodology, Y.Q., H.M.C., E.S. and H.K.; formal analysis, Y.Q. and K.S.; investigation, Y.Q., K.S. and H.K.; resources, Y.Q., H.M.C., D.S., E.S., M.K., K.C., M.S., H.H., J.N. and L.M.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Q. and H.K.; writing—review and editing, all authors; supervision, Y.Q., R.N., B.M.H. and H.K.; funding acquisition, Y.Q., A.T., H.S. and H.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The present study was supported in part by the Japan Initiative for Global Research Network of Infectious Diseases (J-GRID) and the Japan Program for Infectious Diseases Research and Infrastructure (JIDRI) from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) (Nos. JP19fm0108008, JP21wm0125008, and JP21wm0225016), and KAKENHI from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan (MEXT)/Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) (Nos. 19K15992 and 20KK0151). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are provided in the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the staff and students at the International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Japan, the staff of the Department of National Parks and Wildlife of the Ministry of Tourism and Arts of Zambia, and the technicians at the School of Veterinary Medicine of the University of Zambia for their assistance. The authors also thank Alice C.C. Lau for English language editing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Margos, G.; Fingerle, V.; Cutler, S.; Gofton, A.; Stevenson, B.; Estrada-Peña, A. Controversies in bacterial taxonomy: The example of the genus Borrelia. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2020, 11, 101335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Takano, A.; Goka, K.; Une, Y.; Shimada, Y.; Fujita, H.; Shiino, T.; Watanabe, H.; Kawabata, H. Isolation and characterization of a novel Borrelia group of tick-borne borreliae from imported reptiles and their associated ticks. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 12, 134–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Takano, A.; Fujita, H.; Kadosaka, T.; Konnai, S.; Tajima, T.; Watanabe, H.; Ohnishi, M.; Kawabata, H. Characterization of reptile-associated Borrelia sp. in the vector tick, Amblyomma geoemydae, and its association with Lyme disease and relapsing fever Borrelia spp. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2011, 3, 632–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Loh, S.-M.; Gillett, A.; Ryan, U.; Irwin, P.; Oskam, C. Molecular characterization of ‘Candidatus Borrelia tachyglossi’ (family Spirochaetaceae) in echidna ticks, Bothriocroton concolor. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 1075–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Barbour, A.G. Relapsing fever. In Tick-Borne Diseases of Humans; Jesse, L., Goodman, D.T.D., Sonenshine, D.E., Eds.; ASM Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2005; pp. 268–291. [Google Scholar]
  6. Trevisan, G.; Cinco, M.; Trevisini, S.; Di Meo, N.; Ruscio, M.; Forgione, P.; Bonin, S. Borreliae Part 2: Borrelia Relapsing Fever Group and Unclassified Borrelia. Biology 2021, 10, 1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Schwan, T.G.; Anderson, J.M.; Lopez, J.E.; Fischer, R.J.; Raffel, S.J.; McCoy, B.N.; Safronetz, D.; Sogoba, N.; Maïga, O.; Traoré, S.F. Endemic Foci of the Tick-Borne Relapsing Fever Spirochete Borrelia crocidurae in Mali, West Africa, and the Potential for Human Infection. PLoS Neg. Trop. Dis. 2012, 6, e1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mediannikov, O.; Socolovschi, C.; Bassene, H.; Diatta, G.; Ratmanov, P.; Fenollar, F.; Sokhna, C.; Raoult, D. Borrelia crocidurae Infection in Acutely Febrile Patients, Senegal. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014, 20, 1335–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sarih, M.H.; Garnier, M.; Boudebouch, N.; Bouattour, A.; Rihani, A.; Hassar, M.; Gern, L.; Postic, D.; Cornet, M. Borrelia hispanica Relapsing Fever, Morocco. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2009, 15, 1626–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cutler, S.J.; Bonilla, E.M.; Singh, R.J. Population Structure of East African Relapsing Fever Borrelia spp. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2010, 16, 1076–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Qiu, Y.; Nakao, R.; Hang’ombe, B.M.; Sato, K.; Kajihara, M.; Kanchela, S.; Changula, K.; Eto, Y.; Ndebe, J.; Sasaki, M.; et al. Human Borreliosis Caused by a New World Relapsing Fever Borrelia-like Organism in the Old World. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2019, 69, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Qiu, Y.; Simuunza, M.; Kajihara, M.; Chambaro, H.; Harima, H.; Eto, Y.; Simulundu, E.; Squarre, D.; Torii, S.; Takada, A.; et al. Screening of tick-borne pathogens in argasid ticks in Zambia: Expansion of the geographic distribution of Rickettsia lusitaniae and Rickettsia hoogstraalii and detection of putative novel Anaplasma species. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2021, 12, 101720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dupont, H.T.; La Scola, B.; Williams, R.; Raoult, D. A focus of tick-borne relapsing fever in southern Zaire. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1997, 25, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kahlig, P.; Paris, D.H.; Neumayr, A. Louse-borne relapsing fever—A systematic review and analysis of the literature: Part 1—Epidemiology and diagnostic aspects. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2021, 15, e0008564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Nordstrand, A.; Bunikis, I.; Larsson, C.; Tsogbe, K.; Schwan, T.G.; Nilsson, M.; Bergström, S. Tickborne Relapsing Fever Diagnosis Obscured by Malaria, Togo. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2007, 13, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Barbour, A.G.; Fish, D.; Hoen, A.G.; Tsao, J.I.; Diuk-Wasser, M.A.; Bunikis, J.; Travinsky, B. Niche Partitioning of Borrelia burgdorferi and Borrelia miyamotoi in the Same Tick Vector and Mammalian Reservoir Species. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2009, 81, 1120–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Chambaro, H.M.; Sasaki, M.; Sinkala, Y.; Gonzalez, G.; Squarre, D.; Fandamu, P.; Lubaba, C.; Mataa, L.; Shawa, M.; Mwape, K.E.; et al. Evidence for exposure of asymptomatic domestic pigs to African swine fever virus during an inter-epidemic period in Zambia. Transbound Emerg. Dis. 2020, 67, 2741–2752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chitanga, S.; Chambaro, H.M.; Moonga, L.C.; Hayashida, K.; Yamagishi, J.; Muleya, W.; Changula, K.; Mubemba, B.; Simbotwe, M.; Squarre, D.; et al. Rickettsia lusitaniae in Ornithodoros Porcinus Ticks, Zambia. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Roux, V.; Raoult, D. Body Lice as Tools for Diagnosis and Surveillance of Reemerging Diseases. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1999, 37, 596–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Toledo, A.; Anda, P.; Escudero, R.; Larsson, C.; Bergstrom, S.; Benach, J.L. Phylogenetic analysis of a virulent Borrelia species isolated from patients with relapsing fever. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010, 48, 2484–2489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. McCoy, B.N.; Maiga, O.; Schwan, T.G. Detection of Borrelia theileri in Rhipicephalus geigyi from Mali. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2014, 5, 401–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Takano, A.; Toyomane, K.; Konnai, S.; Ohashi, K.; Nakao, M.; Ito, T.; Andoh, M.; Maeda, K.; Watarai, M.; Sato, K.; et al. Tick surveillance for relapsing fever spirochete Borrelia miyamotoi in Hokkaido, Japan. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e104532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lee, K.; Takano, A.; Taylor, K.; Sashika, M.; Shimozuru, M.; Konnai, S.; Kawabata, H.; Tsubota, T. A relapsing fever group Borrelia sp. similar to Borrelia lonestari found among wild sika deer (Cervus nippon yesoensis) and Haemaphysalis spp. ticks in Hokkaido, Japan. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2014, 5, 841–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Talbert, A.; Nyange, A.; Molteni, F. Spraying tick-infested houses with lambda-cyhalothrin reduces the incidence of tick-borne relapsing fever in children under five years old. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1998, 92, 251–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Barclay, A.J.; Coulter, J.B. Tick-borne relapsing fever in central Tanzania. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1990, 84, 852–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fukunaga, M.; Ushijima, Y.; Aoki, L.Y.; Talbert, A. Detection of Borrelia duttonii, a tick-borne relapsing fever agent in central Tanzania, within ticks by flagellin gene-based nested polymerase chain reaction. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2001, 1, 331–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kisinza, W.N.; McCall, P.J.; Mitani, H.; Talbert, A.; Fukunaga, M. A newly identified tick-borne Borrelia species and relapsing fever in Tanzania. Lancet 2003, 362, 1283–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mitani, H.; Talbert, A.; Fukunaga, M. New World relapsing fever Borrelia found in Ornithodoros porcinus ticks in central Tanzania. Microbiol. Immunol. 2004, 48, 501–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fingerle, V.; Pritsch, M.; Wächtler, M.; Margos, G.; Ruske, S.; Jung, J.; Löscher, T.; Wendtner, C.; Wieser, A. “Candidatus Borrelia kalaharica” Detected from a Febrile Traveller Returning to Germany from Vacation in Southern Africa. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016, 10, e0004559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Stete, K.; Rieg, S.; Margos, G.; Häcker, G.; Wagner, D.; Kern, W.V.; Fingerle, V. Case Report and Genetic Sequence Analysis of Candidatus Borrelia kalaharica, Southern Africa. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2018, 24, 1659–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cutler, S.J.; Idris, J.M.; Ahmed, A.O.; Elelu, N. Ornithodoros savignyi, the Tick Vector of “Candidatus Borrelia kalaharica” in Nigeria. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2018, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Han, H.-J.; Liu, J.-W.; Wen, H.-L.; Li, Z.-M.; Lei, S.-C.; Qin, X.-R.; Zhou, C.-M.; Yu, H.; Xiao, X.; Yu, X.-J. Pathogenic New World Relapsing Fever Borrelia in a Myotis Bat, Eastern China, 2015. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2020, 26, 3083–3085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Li, Z.-M.; Xiao, X.; Zhou, C.-M.; Liu, J.-X.; Gu, X.-L.; Fang, L.-Z.; Liu, B.-Y.; Wang, L.-R.; Yu, X.-J.; Han, H.-J. Human-pathogenic relapsing fever Borrelia found in bats from Central China phylogenetically clustered together with relapsing fever borreliae reported in the New World. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2021, 15, e0009113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Qiu, Y.; Squarre, D.; Nakamura, Y.; Lau, A.C.C.; Moonga, L.C.; Kawai, N.; Ohnuma, A.; Hayashida, K.; Nakao, R.; Yamagishi, J.; et al. Evidence of Borrelia theileri in Wild and Domestic Animals in the Kafue Ecosystem of Zambia. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Map of sample collection sites. Capital city and sampling sites are displayed in black and red points. MTNP: Mosi-oa-Tunya National Park, KNP: Kafue National Park, SLNP: South Luangwa National Park.
Figure 1. Map of sample collection sites. Capital city and sampling sites are displayed in black and red points. MTNP: Mosi-oa-Tunya National Park, KNP: Kafue National Park, SLNP: South Luangwa National Park.
Microorganisms 11 00200 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of the Borrelia spp. based on the partial sequence of the flagellin gene flaB. Analyses were performed by the maximum likelihood (ML) method with the Kimura-2 parameter. The sequences generated herein are displayed in bold and red font. The flagellin sequence variations and the numbers of the samples with the same sequence are enclosed in brackets. OM and OP refer to Ornithodoros moubata and O. porcinus, respectively. Bootstrap values > 70% are based on 1000 replications and are shown beside the branches.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of the Borrelia spp. based on the partial sequence of the flagellin gene flaB. Analyses were performed by the maximum likelihood (ML) method with the Kimura-2 parameter. The sequences generated herein are displayed in bold and red font. The flagellin sequence variations and the numbers of the samples with the same sequence are enclosed in brackets. OM and OP refer to Ornithodoros moubata and O. porcinus, respectively. Bootstrap values > 70% are based on 1000 replications and are shown beside the branches.
Microorganisms 11 00200 g002
Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree of the Borrelia spp. based on 1355 bp of 16S ribosomal DNA sequences. The analyses were performed by the ML method with the Kimura-2 parameter. The sequences generated herein are displayed in bold and red font. The 16S rDNA sequence types and the numbers of samples with the same sequence are enclosed in brackets. OM and OP refer to Ornithodoros moubata and O. porcinus, respectively. Bootstrap values > 70% are based on 1000 replications and are shown beside the branches.
Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree of the Borrelia spp. based on 1355 bp of 16S ribosomal DNA sequences. The analyses were performed by the ML method with the Kimura-2 parameter. The sequences generated herein are displayed in bold and red font. The 16S rDNA sequence types and the numbers of samples with the same sequence are enclosed in brackets. OM and OP refer to Ornithodoros moubata and O. porcinus, respectively. Bootstrap values > 70% are based on 1000 replications and are shown beside the branches.
Microorganisms 11 00200 g003
Figure 4.  Phylogenetic trees of Borrelia sp. from MTNP-32. The analyses were performed by the ML method with the Kimura-2 parameter. Bootstrap values > 70% are based on 1000 replications and are shown beside the branches. (a) The tree based on 840 bp of the glpQ sequence; (b) the tree based on 388 bp of the hpt sequence. The sample in this study is in bold and red.
Figure 4.  Phylogenetic trees of Borrelia sp. from MTNP-32. The analyses were performed by the ML method with the Kimura-2 parameter. Bootstrap values > 70% are based on 1000 replications and are shown beside the branches. (a) The tree based on 840 bp of the glpQ sequence; (b) the tree based on 388 bp of the hpt sequence. The sample in this study is in bold and red.
Microorganisms 11 00200 g004
Figure 5.  Detection of Borrelia DNA from tick specimens by real-time PCR. PCR positive by NWB_VIC_1794 (red line) and OWB_FAM_1795 (black line) probes were shown in (A,B), respectively. Each tick specimen was examined in duplicate in this study.
Figure 5.  Detection of Borrelia DNA from tick specimens by real-time PCR. PCR positive by NWB_VIC_1794 (red line) and OWB_FAM_1795 (black line) probes were shown in (A,B), respectively. Each tick specimen was examined in duplicate in this study.
Microorganisms 11 00200 g005
Table 1.  Results of borrelia screening using flaB nested-PCR.
Table 1.  Results of borrelia screening using flaB nested-PCR.
Tick SpeciesSampling LocationNo. Tick CollectedNo. Positive (Tested Pools)Pool Prevalence
Ornithodoros moubataMosi-oa-Tunya National Park72439 (124)31.6%
Ornithodoros porcinusKafue National Park750 (24)NA
Ornithodoros porcinusSouth Luangwa National Park874 (34)11.8%
Total 88643 (182)23.6%
NA: Not applicable.
Table 2.  Results of BLASTn search of flaB sequences.
Table 2.  Results of BLASTn search of flaB sequences.
VariantsSample IDsIdentitySpecies
flaB_Type 1MTNP-6, MTNP-8, MTNP-9, MTNP-10, MTNP-14, MTNP-20, MTNP-22, MTNP-24, MTNP-28, MTNP-29, MTNP-30, MTNP-31, MTNP-33, MTNP-34, MTNP-36, MTNP-37, MTNP-40, MTNP-41, MTNP-42, MTNP-43, MTNP-44, MTNP-49, MTNP-80, MTNP-87, MTNP-88, MTNP-93, MTNP-117, MTNP-118, MTNP-120, MTNP-122, SLNP-13, SLNP-27, SLNP-34100% (294/294 bp)Borrelia sp. VS4 (AB057547) *
flaB_Type 2MTNP-799.7% (293/294 bp)Borrelia sp. VS4 (AB057547) *
flaB_Type 3MTNP-13, MTNP-89, MTNP-96, MTNP-100, MTNP-10399.7% (293/294 bp)Borrelia sp. VS4 (AB057547) *
flaB_Type 4MTNP-3292.6% (275/297 bp)B. duttonii (AB105117)
flaB_Type 5MTNP-4593.9% (276/294 bp)Borrelia sp. VS4 (AB057547) *
flaB_Type 6MTNP-9599.3% (292/294 bp)Borrelia sp. VS4 (AB057547) *
flaB_Type 7SLNP-1999.7% (293/294 bp)Borrelia sp. VS4 (AB057547) *
* Borrelia sp. VS4 was registered as B. duttonii strain TnB. However, the reference papers labeled it as Borrelia sp. op Type C or Borrelia sp. VS4, and it was detected in O. porcinus in the Mvumi region of Tanzania.
Table 3. Results of BLASTn search of 16S ribosomal DNA sequences.
Table 3. Results of BLASTn search of 16S ribosomal DNA sequences.
VariantsSample IDsIdentitySpecies
16S_Type 1MTNP-7, MTNP-8, MTNP-9, MTNP-13, MTNP-14, MTNP-22, MTNP-24, MTNP-29, MTNP-31, MTNP-33, MTNP-41, MTNP-42, MTNP-43, MTNP-45, MTNP-80, MTNP-88, MTNP-100, MTNP-122, SLNP-13, SLNP-27, SLNP-34100% (1348/1348 bp)Borrelia sp. VS4 (AB113315) *
16S_Type 2MTNP-1099.9% (1347/1348 bp)Borrelia sp. VS4 (AB113315) *
16S_Type 3MTNP-28, MTNP-3799.7% (1344/1348 bp)Borrelia sp. VS4 (AB113315) *
16S_Type 4MTNP-30, MTNP-3699.9% (1347/1348 bp)Borrelia sp. VS4 (AB113315) *
16S_Type 5MTNP-3299.8% (1352/1355 bp)B. duttonii strain Ly (CP000976) and B. crocidurae strain Achema (CP003426).
16S_Type 6MTNP-3499.8% (1345/1348 bp)Borrelia sp. VS4 (AB113315) *
16S_Type 7SLNP-1999.9% (1347/1348 bp)Borrelia sp. VS4 (AB113315) *
*: Borrelia sp. VS4 was registered as B. duttonii strain TnB. However, the reference papers labeled it as Borrelia sp. op Type C or Borrelia sp. VS4, and it was detected in O. porcinus in the Mvumi region of Tanzania.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qiu, Y.; Chambaro, H.M.; Sato, K.; Squarre, D.; Simulundu, E.; Kajihara, M.; Changula, K.; Simbotwe, M.; Harima, H.; Ndebe, J.; et al. Detection of Old and New World Relapsing Fever Borreliae in Ornithodoros Ticks Collected from Warthog Burrows in Zambia. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010200

AMA Style

Qiu Y, Chambaro HM, Sato K, Squarre D, Simulundu E, Kajihara M, Changula K, Simbotwe M, Harima H, Ndebe J, et al. Detection of Old and New World Relapsing Fever Borreliae in Ornithodoros Ticks Collected from Warthog Burrows in Zambia. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(1):200. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010200

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qiu, Yongjin, Herman M. Chambaro, Kozue Sato, David Squarre, Edgar Simulundu, Masahiro Kajihara, Katendi Changula, Manyando Simbotwe, Hayato Harima, Joseph Ndebe, and et al. 2023. "Detection of Old and New World Relapsing Fever Borreliae in Ornithodoros Ticks Collected from Warthog Burrows in Zambia" Microorganisms 11, no. 1: 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010200

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop